public company

Acadia Healthcare

A large for-profit behavioral-health hospital operator whose inpatient model has faced federal settlement allegations involving medically unnecessary inpatient behavioral health services and public concern over patient detention and profit incentives. Acadia Healthcare scores low because of documented human harm, coercive violence, and person-dependent governance, with poor loss-bearing fidelity and extractive economics reinforcing the negative evaluation.

Why this matters: For-profit locked psychiatric care is a high-risk power relation: payment incentives, detention authority, medical vulnerability, and information asymmetry converge on people in crisis.

Letter grade F Malignant Medium confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1 Last reviewed May 7, 2026

Final Score -37* F - Malignant

FMALIGNANT-37 pts

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material6

Bonus+0

Cap35Ownership <= 2 and Governance <= 2

After Cap6

Penalties-43

Private Government badge

Acadia Healthcare receives the Private Government badge because it combines large-scale private rule-setting over customers, workers, users, members, or counterparties with OpenLobby-documented lobbying of about $840K on public policy issues.

Evidence: [10]

!Not Verified

Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Evaluation Overview

F - Malignant

The score turns mainly on Labor Sovereignty, with the largest penalty coming from Human Harm.

Strengths

Labor Sovereignty2/7
Ownership1/10
Governance1/10

Penalties

Human Harm-14
Coercive Violence-12
Reversibility-5
Policy Capture-4

Evidence state

ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Linked claims10
Direct axis claims9
Coverage9/17

Scoring Axes

Axis	Score	Why this score
Ownership ? Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.	1 / 10	Acadia identifies itself as a leading behavioral-health provider operating hundreds of facilities and thousands of beds, making scale and payment incentives central to the evaluation. Acadia identifies itself as a leading behavioral-health provider operating hundreds of facilities and thousands of beds, making scale and payment incentives central to the evaluation. That keeps Acadia Healthcare low on Ownership: decisive control remains with shareholders, private owners, executives, or state insiders rather than affected people. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 12 scored entries below, 65 tied, 149 above on Ownership. Linked evidence context Acadia identifies itself as a leading behavioral-health provider operating hundreds of facilities and thousands of beds, making scale and payment incentives central to the evaluation. [1] context HHS OIG and DOJ announced that Acadia agreed to pay $19.85 million to resolve allegations involving medically unnecessary inpatient behavioral health services or services failing federal and state requirements. [2] context Federal public materials and Senate oversight concerns describe Acadia as a large behavioral-health facility operator facing allegations tied to unnecessary inpatient care, detention-related concerns, inadequate staffing, and profit incentives in locked or residential treatment settings. [3]
Governance ? Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.	1 / 10	Acadia identifies itself as a leading behavioral-health provider operating hundreds of facilities and thousands of beds, making scale and payment incentives central to the evaluation. Acadia identifies itself as a leading behavioral-health provider operating hundreds of facilities and thousands of beds, making scale and payment incentives central to the evaluation. That keeps Acadia Healthcare low on Governance: ordinary users, workers, customers, or affected communities cannot change the rules that govern them. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 2 scored entries below, 68 tied, 156 above on Governance. Linked evidence context Acadia identifies itself as a leading behavioral-health provider operating hundreds of facilities and thousands of beds, making scale and payment incentives central to the evaluation. [1] context HHS OIG and DOJ announced that Acadia agreed to pay $19.85 million to resolve allegations involving medically unnecessary inpatient behavioral health services or services failing federal and state requirements. [2] context Federal public materials and Senate oversight concerns describe Acadia as a large behavioral-health facility operator facing allegations tied to unnecessary inpatient care, detention-related concerns, inadequate staffing, and profit incentives in locked or residential treatment settings. [3]
Extraction ? Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.	1 / 10	Acadia identifies itself as a leading behavioral-health provider operating hundreds of facilities and thousands of beds, making scale and payment incentives central to the evaluation. Acadia identifies itself as a leading behavioral-health provider operating hundreds of facilities and thousands of beds, making scale and payment incentives central to the evaluation. That keeps Acadia Healthcare low on Extraction: the business model makes extraction from workers, users, suppliers, customers, or the public central rather than incidental. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 2 scored entries below, 17 tied, 207 above on Extraction. Uncertainty Priority page: add more axis-specific research over time to make the comparative placement harder to dispute. Linked evidence Acadia identifies itself as a leading behavioral-health provider operating hundreds of facilities and thousands of beds, making scale and payment incentives central to the evaluation. [1] context HHS OIG and DOJ announced that Acadia agreed to pay $19.85 million to resolve allegations involving medically unnecessary inpatient behavioral health services or services failing federal and state requirements. [2] context Federal public materials and Senate oversight concerns describe Acadia as a large behavioral-health facility operator facing allegations tied to unnecessary inpatient care, detention-related concerns, inadequate staffing, and profit incentives in locked or residential treatment settings. [3]
Labor Sovereignty ? Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.	2 / 7	Acadia identifies itself as a leading behavioral-health provider operating hundreds of facilities and thousands of beds, making scale and payment incentives central to the evaluation. Acadia identifies itself as a leading behavioral-health provider operating hundreds of facilities and thousands of beds, making scale and payment incentives central to the evaluation. That keeps Acadia Healthcare low on Labor Sovereignty: labor remains managerially controlled, replaceable, or exposed to coercive employment and contracting conditions. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 8 scored entries below, 36 tied, 182 above on Labor Sovereignty. Linked evidence context Acadia identifies itself as a leading behavioral-health provider operating hundreds of facilities and thousands of beds, making scale and payment incentives central to the evaluation. [1] context HHS OIG and DOJ announced that Acadia agreed to pay $19.85 million to resolve allegations involving medically unnecessary inpatient behavioral health services or services failing federal and state requirements. [2] context Federal public materials and Senate oversight concerns describe Acadia as a large behavioral-health facility operator facing allegations tied to unnecessary inpatient care, detention-related concerns, inadequate staffing, and profit incentives in locked or residential treatment settings. [3]
Solidarity with the Unemployed ? Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.	0 / 7	Acadia identifies itself as a leading behavioral-health provider operating hundreds of facilities and thousands of beds, making scale and payment incentives central to the evaluation. Acadia identifies itself as a leading behavioral-health provider operating hundreds of facilities and thousands of beds, making scale and payment incentives central to the evaluation. That keeps Acadia Healthcare low on Solidarity with the Unemployed: the model provides little protection for people who leave, are excluded, or cannot bargain from employment. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 0 scored entries below, 2 tied, 224 above on Solidarity with the Unemployed. Linked evidence context Acadia identifies itself as a leading behavioral-health provider operating hundreds of facilities and thousands of beds, making scale and payment incentives central to the evaluation. [1] context HHS OIG and DOJ announced that Acadia agreed to pay $19.85 million to resolve allegations involving medically unnecessary inpatient behavioral health services or services failing federal and state requirements. [2] context Federal public materials and Senate oversight concerns describe Acadia as a large behavioral-health facility operator facing allegations tied to unnecessary inpatient care, detention-related concerns, inadequate staffing, and profit incentives in locked or residential treatment settings. [3]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity ? Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.	0 / 7	Acadia identifies itself as a leading behavioral-health provider operating hundreds of facilities and thousands of beds, making scale and payment incentives central to the evaluation. Acadia identifies itself as a leading behavioral-health provider operating hundreds of facilities and thousands of beds, making scale and payment incentives central to the evaluation. That keeps Acadia Healthcare low on Loss-Bearing Fidelity: losses, hazards, or adjustment costs are routinely pushed onto workers, customers, suppliers, communities, or the public. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 0 scored entries below, 11 tied, 215 above on Loss-Bearing Fidelity. Linked evidence context Acadia identifies itself as a leading behavioral-health provider operating hundreds of facilities and thousands of beds, making scale and payment incentives central to the evaluation. [1] context HHS OIG and DOJ announced that Acadia agreed to pay $19.85 million to resolve allegations involving medically unnecessary inpatient behavioral health services or services failing federal and state requirements. [2] context Federal public materials and Senate oversight concerns describe Acadia as a large behavioral-health facility operator facing allegations tied to unnecessary inpatient care, detention-related concerns, inadequate staffing, and profit incentives in locked or residential treatment settings. [3]
Market Conduct ? Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.	0 / 5	Acadia identifies itself as a leading behavioral-health provider operating hundreds of facilities and thousands of beds, making scale and payment incentives central to the evaluation. Acadia identifies itself as a leading behavioral-health provider operating hundreds of facilities and thousands of beds, making scale and payment incentives central to the evaluation. That keeps Acadia Healthcare low on Market Conduct: market power, lock-in, coercive pricing, or exclusionary conduct is a major part of the institution's position. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 0 scored entries below, 14 tied, 212 above on Market Conduct. Linked evidence context Acadia identifies itself as a leading behavioral-health provider operating hundreds of facilities and thousands of beds, making scale and payment incentives central to the evaluation. [1] context HHS OIG and DOJ announced that Acadia agreed to pay $19.85 million to resolve allegations involving medically unnecessary inpatient behavioral health services or services failing federal and state requirements. [2] context Federal public materials and Senate oversight concerns describe Acadia as a large behavioral-health facility operator facing allegations tied to unnecessary inpatient care, detention-related concerns, inadequate staffing, and profit incentives in locked or residential treatment settings. [3]
Product Integrity ? Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.	1 / 5	Acadia identifies itself as a leading behavioral-health provider operating hundreds of facilities and thousands of beds, making scale and payment incentives central to the evaluation. Acadia identifies itself as a leading behavioral-health provider operating hundreds of facilities and thousands of beds, making scale and payment incentives central to the evaluation. That keeps Acadia Healthcare low on Product Integrity: the core offering is closely tied to harmful, addictive, deceptive, degrading, or low-integrity product design. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 5 scored entries below, 17 tied, 204 above on Product Integrity. Linked evidence context Acadia identifies itself as a leading behavioral-health provider operating hundreds of facilities and thousands of beds, making scale and payment incentives central to the evaluation. [1] context HHS OIG and DOJ announced that Acadia agreed to pay $19.85 million to resolve allegations involving medically unnecessary inpatient behavioral health services or services failing federal and state requirements. [2] context Federal public materials and Senate oversight concerns describe Acadia as a large behavioral-health facility operator facing allegations tied to unnecessary inpatient care, detention-related concerns, inadequate staffing, and profit incentives in locked or residential treatment settings. [3]
Scale Integrity ? Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.	0 / 5	Acadia identifies itself as a leading behavioral-health provider operating hundreds of facilities and thousands of beds, making scale and payment incentives central to the evaluation. Acadia identifies itself as a leading behavioral-health provider operating hundreds of facilities and thousands of beds, making scale and payment incentives central to the evaluation. That keeps Acadia Healthcare low on Scale Integrity: scale magnifies harm, gatekeeping, opacity, or extraction rather than disciplining it. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 0 scored entries below, 13 tied, 213 above on Scale Integrity. Linked evidence context Acadia identifies itself as a leading behavioral-health provider operating hundreds of facilities and thousands of beds, making scale and payment incentives central to the evaluation. [1] context HHS OIG and DOJ announced that Acadia agreed to pay $19.85 million to resolve allegations involving medically unnecessary inpatient behavioral health services or services failing federal and state requirements. [2] context Federal public materials and Senate oversight concerns describe Acadia as a large behavioral-health facility operator facing allegations tied to unnecessary inpatient care, detention-related concerns, inadequate staffing, and profit incentives in locked or residential treatment settings. [3]

Penalties

Penalty	Applied	Why this penalty
Reversibility ? Applied when positive conduct depends on current living leaders, founders, family owners, or other person-contingent governance rather than durable structure. Range: -5 to 0.	-5	Acadia is a public company with shareholder governance, so any patient-protective reforms remain reversible by corporate management and capital-market pressure. Acadia is a public company with shareholder governance, so any patient-protective reforms remain reversible by corporate management and capital-market pressure. That warrants a severe Reversibility penalty because favorable conduct depends on current people or discretionary leadership rather than locked stakeholder structure. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 0 scored entries below, 95 tied, 131 above on Reversibility. Linked evidence Acadia is a public company with shareholder governance, so any patient-protective reforms remain reversible by corporate management and capital-market pressure. [4]
Human Harm ? Severity, scale, culpability, vulnerable targets, willful reoffense, reputation laundering, pattern escalation, and time decay. Range: -20 to 0.	-14	HHS OIG and DOJ announced that Acadia agreed to pay $19.85 million to resolve allegations involving medically unnecessary inpatient behavioral health services or services failing federal and state requirements. HHS OIG and DOJ announced that Acadia agreed to pay $19.85 million to resolve allegations involving medically unnecessary inpatient behavioral health services or services failing federal and state requirements. That warrants a severe Human Harm penalty because ordinary operation, documented misconduct, or institutional power creates serious injury, deprivation, abuse, or foreseeable human damage. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 16 scored entries below, 3 tied, 207 above on Human Harm. Linked evidence HHS OIG and DOJ announced that Acadia agreed to pay $19.85 million to resolve allegations involving medically unnecessary inpatient behavioral health services or services failing federal and state requirements. [2]
Coercive Violence ? Direct or institutionally enabled killing, torture, detention abuse, armed repression, forced displacement, violent domination, or nonconsensual crisis-line emergency escalation that exposes callers to confinement or force. Range: -30 to 0.	-12	Federal public materials and Senate oversight concerns describe Acadia as a large behavioral-health facility operator facing allegations tied to unnecessary inpatient care,… Federal public materials and Senate oversight concerns describe Acadia as a large behavioral-health facility operator facing allegations tied to unnecessary inpatient care, detention-related concerns, inadequate staffing, and profit incentives in locked or residential treatment settings. That warrants a substantial Coercive Violence penalty because the institution uses, enables, profits from, or materially supports violent domination, detention abuse, war, or armed coercion. The value is substantial but not at the floor because the linked record shows serious conduct without the strongest aggravating factors on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 7 scored entries below, 0 tied, 219 above on Coercive Violence. Linked evidence Federal public materials and Senate oversight concerns describe Acadia as a large behavioral-health facility operator facing allegations tied to unnecessary inpatient care, detention-related concerns, inadequate staffing, and profit incentives in locked or residential treatment settings. [3]
Policy Capture ? Private-interest attempts to bend law, regulation, subsidies, taxes, enforcement, trade, labor, safety, competition, environmental, healthcare, housing, surveillance, civil-liberties, or consumer policy against workers, customers, citizens, affected communities, or ecological life. Public-interest advocacy is not penalized merely because it is lobbying. Range: -15 to 0.	-4	OpenLobby records ACADIA HEALTHCARE lobbying on healthcare with about $840K in spending across 15 filings; the reviewed filings document private institutional lobbying over public rules rather than a public-interest advocacy role. OpenLobby records ACADIA HEALTHCARE lobbying on healthcare with about $840K in spending across 15 filings; the reviewed filings document private institutional lobbying over public rules rather than a public-interest advocacy role. That warrants a limited Policy Capture penalty because private institutional pressure is being applied to public rules while affected people cannot democratically govern that agenda. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Linked evidence OpenLobby records ACADIA HEALTHCARE lobbying on healthcare with about $840K in spending across 15 filings; the reviewed filings document private institutional lobbying over public rules rather than a public-interest advocacy role. [9]
Accountability Opacity ? Material opacity, reputation laundering, or hidden accountability structures that prevent public accountability. Range: -2 to 0.	-2	Acadia’s public record includes government investigations and settlement allegations over inpatient behavioral-health billing and care necessity, indicating accountability and… Acadia’s public record includes government investigations and settlement allegations over inpatient behavioral-health billing and care necessity, indicating accountability and accountability-opacity risk around what patients and payers were told about need for inpatient services. That warrants a severe Accountability Opacity penalty because material facts, risks, conflicts, ownership, or accountability information are obscured from the public. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 0 scored entries below, 52 tied, 174 above on Accountability Opacity. Linked evidence Acadia’s public record includes government investigations and settlement allegations over inpatient behavioral-health billing and care necessity, indicating accountability and accountability-opacity risk around what patients and payers were told about need for inpatient services. [5]
Identity Capture ? Customer pressure, employee pressure, and pervasive identity saturation. Range: -3 to 0.	-2	Acadia’s behavioral-health inpatient model depends on psychiatric and substance-use clinical classifications that can determine admission, retention, billing, and discharge authority over people in crisis. Acadia’s behavioral-health inpatient model depends on psychiatric and substance-use clinical classifications that can determine admission, retention, billing, and discharge authority over people in crisis. That warrants a substantial Identity Capture penalty because users, workers, customers, or publics are pressured into identity attachment that protects institutional power. The value is substantial but not at the floor because the linked record shows serious conduct without the strongest aggravating factors on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 13 scored entries below, 10 tied, 203 above on Identity Capture. Linked evidence Acadia’s behavioral-health inpatient model depends on psychiatric and substance-use clinical classifications that can determine admission, retention, billing, and discharge authority over people in crisis. [6]
Surveillance Capture ? Invasive surveillance, unreasonably non-optional tracking, facial recognition, biometric identification, or AI behavior scanning of customers, workers, bystanders, or the public. Range: -5 to 0.	-1	Locked and residential behavioral-health facilities ordinarily monitor patients’ movements, safety status, and clinical behavior; Acadia’s scale makes this surveillance relation material even without a separate biometric claim. Locked and residential behavioral-health facilities ordinarily monitor patients’ movements, safety status, and clinical behavior; Acadia’s scale makes this surveillance relation material even without a separate biometric claim. That warrants a limited Surveillance Capture penalty because customers, workers, users, bystanders, or the public are exposed to invasive tracking, biometrics, or behavior scanning. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 35 scored entries below, 2 tied, 189 above on Surveillance Capture. Linked evidence Locked and residential behavioral-health facilities ordinarily monitor patients’ movements, safety status, and clinical behavior; Acadia’s scale makes this surveillance relation material even without a separate biometric claim. [7]
Ideological Disavowal ? Concealed ideology presented as neutrality, expertise, professional necessity, public-service administration, market inevitability, or non-ideological common sense while exercising power. Range: -3 to 0.	-3	Acadia Healthcare's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Acadia Healthcare combines major gatekeeping, coercive, or infrastructural power with pronounced… Acadia Healthcare's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Acadia Healthcare combines major gatekeeping, coercive, or infrastructural power with pronounced claims of neutrality, administrative necessity, national legitimacy, safety, objectivity, or professional expertise. That warrants a severe Ideological Disavowal penalty because the institution presents situated, contested choices as neutrality, expertise, inevitability, safety, or common sense. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Ideological Disavowal 0 to -3 recalibration: 0 for explicit standpoint or no penalty-level neutrality theater; -1 for bounded softening of contested choices; -2 for strong neutrality theater by a powerful institution; -3 for major gatekeeping or coercive power presented as neutral, necessary, objective, or non-ideological. Uncertainty This recalibration uses public self-presentation and profile evidence; later review should add direct language-analysis evidence for high-impact institutions. Linked evidence Acadia Healthcare's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Acadia Healthcare combines major gatekeeping, coercive, or infrastructural power with pronounced claims of neutrality, administrative necessity, national legitimacy, safety, objectivity, or professional expertise. [8]

Bonus Credits

No bonus credits applied in this version.

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

Medium 76/100

9 verified linked claims 9 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 9/17 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 17/20

9 verified linked claims

Source quality 15/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 9/18

9 direct claims across 17 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 5/10

9/17 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending

VerificationUnverified

ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)

ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)

Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.

Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

1Acadia identifies itself as a leading behavioral-health provider operating hundreds of facilities and thousands of beds, making scale and payment incentives central to the evaluation.

Extraction Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 7, 2026

Acadia Healthcare statement on government investigationGeneral web source · 58%

2HHS OIG and DOJ announced that Acadia agreed to pay $19.85 million to resolve allegations involving medically unnecessary inpatient behavioral health services or services failing federal and state requirements.

Human Harm Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 7, 2026

HHS OIG: Acadia Healthcare settlement for medically unnecessary inpatient behavioral health servicesPrimary public record · 100%

3Federal public materials and Senate oversight concerns describe Acadia as a large behavioral-health facility operator facing allegations tied to unnecessary inpatient care, detention-related concerns, inadequate staffing, and profit incentives in locked or residential treatment settings.

Coercive Violence Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 7, 2026

HHS OIG: Acadia Healthcare settlement for medically unnecessary inpatient behavioral health servicesPrimary public record · 100%
Senator Markey letter regarding Acadia Healthcare patient-care concernsPrimary public record · 100%

4Acadia is a public company with shareholder governance, so any patient-protective reforms remain reversible by corporate management and capital-market pressure.

Reversibility Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 7, 2026

Acadia Healthcare statement on government investigationGeneral web source · 58%

5Acadia’s public record includes government investigations and settlement allegations over inpatient behavioral-health billing and care necessity, indicating accountability and accountability-opacity risk around what patients and payers were told about need for inpatient services.

Accountability Opacity Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 7, 2026

HHS OIG: Acadia Healthcare settlement for medically unnecessary inpatient behavioral health servicesPrimary public record · 100%
Acadia Healthcare statement on government investigationGeneral web source · 58%

6Acadia’s behavioral-health inpatient model depends on psychiatric and substance-use clinical classifications that can determine admission, retention, billing, and discharge authority over people in crisis.

Identity Capture Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 7, 2026

HHS OIG: Acadia Healthcare settlement for medically unnecessary inpatient behavioral health servicesPrimary public record · 100%
Acadia Healthcare statement on government investigationGeneral web source · 58%

7Locked and residential behavioral-health facilities ordinarily monitor patients’ movements, safety status, and clinical behavior; Acadia’s scale makes this surveillance relation material even without a separate biometric claim.

Surveillance Capture Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 7, 2026

Acadia Healthcare statement on government investigationGeneral web source · 58%
Senator Markey letter regarding Acadia Healthcare patient-care concernsPrimary public record · 100%

8Acadia Healthcare's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Acadia Healthcare combines major gatekeeping, coercive, or infrastructural power with pronounced claims of neutrality, administrative necessity, national legitimacy, safety, objectivity, or professional expertise.

Ideological Disavowal Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 9, 2026

AI scaffold

Acadia Healthcare official siteGeneral web source · 58%
Acadia Healthcare statement on government investigationGeneral web source · 58%
HHS OIG: Acadia Healthcare settlement for medically unnecessary inpatient behavioral health servicesPrimary public record · 100%

9OpenLobby records ACADIA HEALTHCARE lobbying on healthcare with about $840K in spending across 15 filings; the reviewed filings document private institutional lobbying over public rules rather than a public-interest advocacy role.

Policy Capture Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

OpenLobby — ACADIA HEALTHCARE lobbying profileGeneral web source · 58%

10Acadia Healthcare receives the Private Government badge because it combines large-scale private rule-setting over customers, workers, users, members, or counterparties with OpenLobby-documented lobbying of about $840K on public policy issues.

Private Government Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

OpenLobby — ACADIA HEALTHCARE lobbying profileGeneral web source · 58%

Alternatives

Competitors

AGOOD66 People USA Rose Houses peer respite network · same market AGOOD66 Promise Resource Network Retreat peer-run respite · same market AGOOD66 Wildflower Alliance Afiya Peer Respite peer-run respite · same market AGOOD63 Trans Lifeline trans peer-support hotline · same market AGOOD61 CSPNJ Wellness Respite Services peer-operated respite network · same market AGOOD61 Georgia Peer Support and Wellness Respite Centers peer respite network · same market AGOOD61 Juniper Peer-Run Respite peer-run respite · same market AGOOD61 Karaya Peer Respite peer-run respite · same market

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for Acadia Healthcare Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

May 7, 2026 at 12:00 AM UTC ai-scaffolding seed-added

Added psychiatric, professional-ethics, coercive psychiatric-system, peer-respite, or psychiatric-survivor alternative institution with source-backed claims and full score components.

View Full Audit Log