public company

Amazon

Industry Retail

A public retail, logistics, cloud, advertising, and marketplace platform with antitrust, warehouse labor, seller-dependence, and dark-pattern enforcement concerns. Amazon scores low because of documented human harm, subscription capture, and youth capture, with weak accountability reinforcing the negative evaluation.

Why this matters: A company can be operationally useful while structurally extracting from sellers, workers, and customers.

Letter grade F Malignant High confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1 Last reviewed May 6, 2026

Final Score -15* F - Malignant

FMALIGNANT-15 pts

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material20

Bonus+0

Cap35Ownership <= 2 and Governance <= 2

After Cap20

Penalties-35

Private Government badge

Amazon receives the Private Government badge because it combines large-scale private rule-setting over customers, workers, users, members, or counterparties with OpenLobby-documented lobbying of about $2.1M on public policy issues.

Evidence: [19]

Policy Capture: L for Lobbying

The L badge appears when the Policy Capture penalty is severe. Here, L stands for Lobbying: the policy-capture value is -9, meaning the evidence indicates major private-interest lobbying or policy pressure against workers, customers, citizens, affected communities, democratic accountability, or ecological life.

Evidence: [17]

!Not Verified

Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Evaluation Overview

F - Malignant

The score turns mainly on Extraction, with the largest penalty coming from Human Harm.

Strengths

Extraction5/10
Product Integrity3/5
Ownership2/10

Penalties

Human Harm-10
Policy Capture-9
Subscription Capture-5
Youth Capture-4

Evidence state

ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Linked claims19
Direct axis claims18
Coverage18/18

Scoring Axes

Axis	Score	Why this score
Ownership ? Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.	2 / 10	Amazon is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 78 scored entries below, 21 tied, 127 above on Ownership. Linked evidence Amazon is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. [1]
Governance ? Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.	2 / 10	Amazon is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 71 scored entries below, 22 tied, 133 above on Governance. Linked evidence context Amazon is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. [1] context The FTC and state attorneys general sued Amazon in 2023 alleging unlawful monopoly maintenance and anticompetitive marketplace conduct. [2] context OSHA cited Amazon for workplace safety hazards at warehouse facilities, including ergonomic hazards tied to injury risk. [3] Amazon’s investor and governance materials show public-company control by board, executives, and shareholders rather than workers, sellers, warehouse communities, Prime members, or AWS customers. [4]
Extraction ? Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.	5 / 10	Amazon is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. Amazon is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. That places Amazon in the middle of Extraction: the institution creates real value but still leaves room for rent extraction, unequal bargaining, or surplus capture. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 95 scored entries below, 19 tied, 112 above on Extraction. Linked evidence context Amazon is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. [1] context The FTC and state attorneys general sued Amazon in 2023 alleging unlawful monopoly maintenance and anticompetitive marketplace conduct. [2] context OSHA cited Amazon for workplace safety hazards at warehouse facilities, including ergonomic hazards tied to injury risk. [3] Amazon’s marketplace, Prime, logistics, advertising, and AWS businesses create real consumer and infrastructure value while also enabling rent extraction from sellers, workers, and dependent customers. [5]
Labor Sovereignty ? Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.	2 / 7	Amazon is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 8 scored entries below, 36 tied, 182 above on Labor Sovereignty. Linked evidence context Amazon is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. [1] context The FTC and state attorneys general sued Amazon in 2023 alleging unlawful monopoly maintenance and anticompetitive marketplace conduct. [2] context OSHA cited Amazon for workplace safety hazards at warehouse facilities, including ergonomic hazards tied to injury risk. [3] OSHA citations over warehouse hazards and Amazon’s managerial logistics model show workers lack enough control to prevent pace, safety, and ergonomic risks from being imposed on them. [6]
Solidarity with the Unemployed ? Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.	2 / 7	Amazon is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. Amazon is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. That keeps Amazon low on Solidarity with the Unemployed: the model provides little protection for people who leave, are excluded, or cannot bargain from employment. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 31 scored entries below, 49 tied, 146 above on Solidarity with the Unemployed. Linked evidence context Amazon is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. [1] context The FTC and state attorneys general sued Amazon in 2023 alleging unlawful monopoly maintenance and anticompetitive marketplace conduct. [2] context OSHA cited Amazon for workplace safety hazards at warehouse facilities, including ergonomic hazards tied to injury risk. [3] Amazon provides broad retail access and some small-business selling infrastructure, but its model gives little protection to workers, sellers, or consumers who lose income or bargaining power. [7]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity ? Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.	2 / 7	Amazon's labor-safety and workforce-conduct claims provides evidence for the relevant scoring judgment operational efficiency and scale have repeatedly shifted risk and injury concerns onto workers. Amazon's labor-safety and workforce-conduct claims provides evidence for the relevant scoring judgment operational efficiency and scale have repeatedly shifted risk and injury concerns onto workers. That keeps Amazon low on Loss-Bearing Fidelity: losses, hazards, or adjustment costs are routinely pushed onto workers, customers, suppliers, communities, or the public. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 33 scored entries below, 14 tied, 179 above on Loss-Bearing Fidelity. Linked evidence context Amazon is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. [1] context The FTC and state attorneys general sued Amazon in 2023 alleging unlawful monopoly maintenance and anticompetitive marketplace conduct. [2] context OSHA cited Amazon for workplace safety hazards at warehouse facilities, including ergonomic hazards tied to injury risk. [3] Amazon's labor-safety and workforce-conduct claims provides evidence for the relevant scoring judgment operational efficiency and scale have repeatedly shifted risk and injury concerns onto workers. [8]
Market Conduct ? Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.	1 / 5	The FTC and state attorneys general sued Amazon in 2023 alleging unlawful monopoly maintenance and anticompetitive marketplace conduct. The FTC and state attorneys general sued Amazon in 2023 alleging unlawful monopoly maintenance and anticompetitive marketplace conduct. That keeps Amazon low on Market Conduct: market power, lock-in, coercive pricing, or exclusionary conduct is a major part of the institution's position. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 15 scored entries below, 15 tied, 196 above on Market Conduct. Linked evidence The FTC and state attorneys general sued Amazon in 2023 alleging unlawful monopoly maintenance and anticompetitive marketplace conduct. [2]
Product Integrity ? Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.	3 / 5	Amazon is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. Amazon is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. That places Amazon in the middle of Product Integrity: the product has real use value but is compromised by incentives, monetization, lock-in, quality degradation, or risk. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 37 scored entries below, 23 tied, 166 above on Product Integrity. Linked evidence context Amazon is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. [1] context The FTC and state attorneys general sued Amazon in 2023 alleging unlawful monopoly maintenance and anticompetitive marketplace conduct. [2] context OSHA cited Amazon for workplace safety hazards at warehouse facilities, including ergonomic hazards tied to injury risk. [3] Amazon’s retail marketplace, delivery, Prime Video, Kindle, devices, and AWS services are useful, but marketplace quality, dark-pattern, safety, and monopoly allegations compromise product integrity. [9]
Scale Integrity ? Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.	1 / 5	Amazon is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 14 scored entries below, 16 tied, 196 above on Scale Integrity. Linked evidence context Amazon is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. [1] context The FTC and state attorneys general sued Amazon in 2023 alleging unlawful monopoly maintenance and anticompetitive marketplace conduct. [2] context OSHA cited Amazon for workplace safety hazards at warehouse facilities, including ergonomic hazards tied to injury risk. [3] Amazon reports huge scale across retail, marketplace, logistics, Prime media, advertising, and AWS, and FTC and OSHA actions show that scale can magnify gatekeeping and labor harm rather than accountability. [10]

Penalties

Penalty	Applied	Why this penalty
Human Harm ? Severity, scale, culpability, vulnerable targets, willful reoffense, reputation laundering, pattern escalation, and time decay. Range: -20 to 0.	-10	OSHA cited Amazon for workplace safety hazards at warehouse facilities, including ergonomic hazards tied to injury risk. OSHA cited Amazon for workplace safety hazards at warehouse facilities, including ergonomic hazards tied to injury risk. That warrants a substantial Human Harm penalty because ordinary operation, documented misconduct, or institutional power creates serious injury, deprivation, abuse, or foreseeable human damage. The value is substantial but not at the floor because the linked record shows serious conduct without the strongest aggravating factors on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 24 scored entries below, 6 tied, 196 above on Human Harm. Linked evidence OSHA cited Amazon for workplace safety hazards at warehouse facilities, including ergonomic hazards tied to injury risk. [3]
Policy Capture ? Private-interest attempts to bend law, regulation, subsidies, taxes, enforcement, trade, labor, safety, competition, environmental, healthcare, housing, surveillance, civil-liberties, or consumer policy against workers, customers, citizens, affected communities, or ecological life. Public-interest advocacy is not penalized merely because it is lobbying. Range: -15 to 0.	-9	OpenLobby records AMAZON.COM lobbying on transportation, tax, government issues, trade, labor, small-business policy, and other issues with about $2.1M in spending across 31 filings; the… OpenLobby records AMAZON.COM lobbying on transportation, tax, government issues, trade, labor, small-business policy, and other issues with about $2.1M in spending across 31 filings; the reviewed filings document private institutional lobbying over public rules rather than a public-interest advocacy role. That warrants a substantial Policy Capture penalty because private institutional pressure is being applied to public rules while affected people cannot democratically govern that agenda. The value is substantial but not at the floor because the linked record shows serious conduct without the strongest aggravating factors on this axis. Linked evidence OpenLobby records AMAZON.COM lobbying on transportation, tax, government issues, trade, labor, small-business policy, and other issues with about $2.1M in spending across 31 filings; the reviewed filings document private institutional lobbying over public rules rather than a public-interest advocacy role. [17]
Toxic Products ? Current sale of products whose ordinary use, exposure, ingredients, residues, packaging, or formulation creates toxic, addictive, or consumer-safety risk. Food products receive at least light scrutiny for artificial colors, artificial flavors, petro-derived additives, pesticide residues, contaminants, endocrine-disrupting packaging, and ultra-processed formulation. Ordinary adult nightlife or alcohol service is not penalized by itself without evidence of predatory marketing, youth targeting, addiction-extractive design, or unusual product-safety misconduct. Range: -5 to 0.	-1	Amazon currently operates a broad retail marketplace where toxic-product screening includes pesticides, chemical products, and other high-risk categories; the product category creates… Amazon currently operates a broad retail marketplace where toxic-product screening includes pesticides, chemical products, and other high-risk categories; the product category creates ordinary toxic, addictive, or consumer-safety exposure under the directory's toxic-products screen. That warrants a limited Toxic Products penalty because ordinary use, exposure, ingredients, residues, packaging, or formulation creates material toxic, addictive, or consumer-safety risk. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 24 scored entries below, 14 tied, 188 above on Toxic Products. Linked evidence Amazon currently operates a broad retail marketplace where toxic-product screening includes pesticides, chemical products, and other high-risk categories; the product category creates ordinary toxic, addictive, or consumer-safety exposure under the directory's toxic-products screen. [13]
Youth Capture ? Manipulative youth-directed marketing, youth-data or attention monetization, collectible/add-on traps, parasocial or identity capture, surprise mechanics, or treating young people as lower-disclosure consumers. Making useful toys or welcoming children is not itself penalized. Range: -5 to 0.	-4	The FTC and DOJ charged Amazon with violating children’s privacy law by retaining kids’ Alexa voice recordings and undermining deletion requests, and the FTC separately alleged Amazon billed parents for children’s unauthorized in-app charges. The FTC and DOJ charged Amazon with violating children’s privacy law by retaining kids’ Alexa voice recordings and undermining deletion requests, and the FTC separately alleged Amazon billed parents for children’s unauthorized in-app charges. That warrants a severe Youth Capture penalty because young people are treated as manipulable consumers, data sources, attention targets, or culture markets. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 3 scored entries below, 3 tied, 220 above on Youth Capture. Linked evidence The FTC and DOJ charged Amazon with violating children’s privacy law by retaining kids’ Alexa voice recordings and undermining deletion requests, and the FTC separately alleged Amazon billed parents for children’s unauthorized in-app charges. [14]
Subscription Capture ? Manipulative recurring-payment, automatic-renewal, cancellation-friction, bundling, trial-conversion, or refund designs that profit from inertia or confusion. Range: -5 to 0.	-5	The FTC alleged that Amazon enrolled consumers in Prime without consent and knowingly made cancellation difficult through manipulative enrollment and cancellation flows. The FTC alleged that Amazon enrolled consumers in Prime without consent and knowingly made cancellation difficult through manipulative enrollment and cancellation flows. That warrants a severe Subscription Capture penalty because recurring-payment design profits from inertia, confusion, bundling, renewal friction, or cancellation difficulty. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Subscription Capture calibration: -5 anchor because the FTC alleged nonconsensual enrollment plus deliberately obstructed cancellation in a massive recurring-membership product. Uncertainty Later review should compare current Prime sign-up and cancellation UX against the alleged practices and any final case outcome. Linked evidence The FTC alleged that Amazon enrolled consumers in Prime without consent and knowingly made cancellation difficult through manipulative enrollment and cancellation flows. [16]
Price Manipulation ? Opaque, personalized, dynamic, urgency-based, algorithmic, hidden-fee, or market-power pricing that prevents customers from knowing the real price or exploits dependency, scarcity, or information asymmetry. Transparent posted pricing and genuinely public rate cards are not penalized here. Range: -5 to 0.	-2	Amazon's Price Manipulation penalty is limited but real because the linked record concerns the presentation and renewal economics of Prime rather than individualized product prices. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Price Manipulation rollout; full column calibration should be revisited as pricing-practice evidence is added. Linked evidence The FTC alleged Amazon used dark patterns in Prime enrollment and cancellation, making the price and renewal consequences of Prime harder for consumers to refuse or escape. [18]
Accountability Opacity ? Material opacity, reputation laundering, or hidden accountability structures that prevent public accountability. Range: -2 to 0.	-2	The FTC Prime dark-pattern case is relevant to the accountability-opacity penalty because the agency alleged manipulative enrollment and cancellation flows that hid or obscured consumer choice. The FTC Prime dark-pattern case is relevant to the accountability-opacity penalty because the agency alleged manipulative enrollment and cancellation flows that hid or obscured consumer choice. That warrants a severe Accountability Opacity penalty because material facts, risks, conflicts, ownership, or accountability information are obscured from the public. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 0 scored entries below, 52 tied, 174 above on Accountability Opacity. Linked evidence The FTC Prime dark-pattern case is relevant to the accountability-opacity penalty because the agency alleged manipulative enrollment and cancellation flows that hid or obscured consumer choice. [11]
Identity Capture ? Customer pressure, employee pressure, and pervasive identity saturation. Range: -3 to 0.	-1	The FTC alleged Amazon used manipulative Prime enrollment and cancellation flows that enrolled consumers without consent and impeded cancellation. The FTC alleged Amazon used manipulative Prime enrollment and cancellation flows that enrolled consumers without consent and impeded cancellation. That warrants a limited Identity Capture penalty because users, workers, customers, or publics are pressured into identity attachment that protects institutional power. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 24 scored entries below, 6 tied, 196 above on Identity Capture. Linked evidence The FTC alleged Amazon used manipulative Prime enrollment and cancellation flows that enrolled consumers without consent and impeded cancellation. [12]
Ideological Disavowal ? Concealed ideology presented as neutrality, expertise, professional necessity, public-service administration, market inevitability, or non-ideological common sense while exercising power. Range: -3 to 0.	-1	Amazon's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Amazon shows bounded neutrality theater: some contested choices are softened through expertise,… Amazon's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Amazon shows bounded neutrality theater: some contested choices are softened through expertise, public-interest, professional, market, safety, or institutional language, but the record does not show dominant concealment of standpoint. That warrants a limited Ideological Disavowal penalty because the institution presents situated, contested choices as neutrality, expertise, inevitability, safety, or common sense. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Ideological Disavowal 0 to -3 recalibration: 0 for explicit standpoint or no penalty-level neutrality theater; -1 for bounded softening of contested choices; -2 for strong neutrality theater by a powerful institution; -3 for major gatekeeping or coercive power presented as neutral, necessary, objective, or non-ideological. Uncertainty This recalibration uses public self-presentation and profile evidence; later review should add direct language-analysis evidence for high-impact institutions. Linked evidence Amazon's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Amazon shows bounded neutrality theater: some contested choices are softened through expertise, public-interest, professional, market, safety, or institutional language, but the record does not show dominant concealment of standpoint. [15]

Bonus Credits

No bonus credits applied in this version.

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

High 85/100

18 verified linked claims 18 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 18/18 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 15/20

18 verified linked claims

Source quality 17/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 14/18

18 direct claims across 18 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 10/10

18/18 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending

VerificationUnverified

ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)

ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)

Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.

Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

1Amazon is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures.

Ownership Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 4, 2026

Amazon investor relationsOfficial self-description · 68%

2The FTC and state attorneys general sued Amazon in 2023 alleging unlawful monopoly maintenance and anticompetitive marketplace conduct.

Market Conduct Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 4, 2026

FTC sues Amazon for illegally maintaining monopoly powerPrimary public record · 100%

3OSHA cited Amazon for workplace safety hazards at warehouse facilities, including ergonomic hazards tied to injury risk.

Human Harm Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 4, 2026

OSHA Amazon warehouse citationsPrimary public record · 100%

4Amazon’s investor and governance materials show public-company control by board, executives, and shareholders rather than workers, sellers, warehouse communities, Prime members, or AWS customers.

Governance Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Amazon reportsOfficial self-description · 68%
Amazon 2024 shareholder letterOfficial self-description · 68%
FTC Amazon monopoly actionPrimary public record · 100%
OSHA Amazon warehouse citationsPrimary public record · 100%

5Amazon’s marketplace, Prime, logistics, advertising, and AWS businesses create real consumer and infrastructure value while also enabling rent extraction from sellers, workers, and dependent customers.

Extraction Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Amazon reportsOfficial self-description · 68%
Amazon 2024 shareholder letterOfficial self-description · 68%
FTC Amazon monopoly actionPrimary public record · 100%
OSHA Amazon warehouse citationsPrimary public record · 100%

6OSHA citations over warehouse hazards and Amazon’s managerial logistics model show workers lack enough control to prevent pace, safety, and ergonomic risks from being imposed on them.

Labor Sovereignty Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Amazon reportsOfficial self-description · 68%
Amazon 2024 shareholder letterOfficial self-description · 68%
FTC Amazon monopoly actionPrimary public record · 100%
OSHA Amazon warehouse citationsPrimary public record · 100%

7Amazon provides broad retail access and some small-business selling infrastructure, but its model gives little protection to workers, sellers, or consumers who lose income or bargaining power.

Solidarity Unemployed Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Amazon reportsOfficial self-description · 68%
Amazon 2024 shareholder letterOfficial self-description · 68%
FTC Amazon monopoly actionPrimary public record · 100%
OSHA Amazon warehouse citationsPrimary public record · 100%

8Amazon's labor-safety and workforce-conduct claims provides evidence for the relevant scoring judgment operational efficiency and scale have repeatedly shifted risk and injury concerns onto workers.

Loss Bearing Fidelity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 5, 2026

OSHA Amazon warehouse safety citationsPrimary public record · 100%
FTC Amazon Prime dark patterns casePrimary public record · 100%

9Amazon’s retail marketplace, delivery, Prime Video, Kindle, devices, and AWS services are useful, but marketplace quality, dark-pattern, safety, and monopoly allegations compromise product integrity.

Product Integrity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Amazon reportsOfficial self-description · 68%
Amazon 2024 shareholder letterOfficial self-description · 68%
FTC Amazon monopoly actionPrimary public record · 100%
OSHA Amazon warehouse citationsPrimary public record · 100%

10Amazon reports huge scale across retail, marketplace, logistics, Prime media, advertising, and AWS, and FTC and OSHA actions show that scale can magnify gatekeeping and labor harm rather than accountability.

Scale Integrity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Amazon reportsOfficial self-description · 68%
Amazon 2024 shareholder letterOfficial self-description · 68%
FTC Amazon monopoly actionPrimary public record · 100%
OSHA Amazon warehouse citationsPrimary public record · 100%

11The FTC Prime dark-pattern case is relevant to the accountability-opacity penalty because the agency alleged manipulative enrollment and cancellation flows that hid or obscured consumer choice.

Accountability Opacity Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 5, 2026

FTC Amazon Prime dark patterns actionPrimary public record · 100%

12The FTC alleged Amazon used manipulative Prime enrollment and cancellation flows that enrolled consumers without consent and impeded cancellation.

Identity Capture Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 4, 2026

FTC Amazon Prime dark patterns actionPrimary public record · 100%

13Amazon currently operates a broad retail marketplace where toxic-product screening includes pesticides, chemical products, and other high-risk categories; the product category creates ordinary toxic, addictive, or consumer-safety exposure under the directory's toxic-products screen.

Toxic Products Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 6, 2026

AI scaffold

Amazon investor relationsOfficial self-description · 68%
EPA: human health issues related to pesticidesPrimary public record · 100%
CDC: Sugar-sweetened beverages and healthPrimary public record · 100%

14The FTC and DOJ charged Amazon with violating children’s privacy law by retaining kids’ Alexa voice recordings and undermining deletion requests, and the FTC separately alleged Amazon billed parents for children’s unauthorized in-app charges.

Youth Capture Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 7, 2026

FTC: Amazon Alexa children privacy chargesPrimary public record · 100%
FTC: Amazon children in-app purchase chargesPrimary public record · 100%

15Amazon's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Amazon shows bounded neutrality theater: some contested choices are softened through expertise, public-interest, professional, market, safety, or institutional language, but the record does not show dominant concealment of standpoint.

Ideological Disavowal Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 9, 2026

AI scaffold

Amazon official siteOfficial self-description · 68%
FTC sues Amazon for illegally maintaining monopoly powerPrimary public record · 100%
OSHA Amazon warehouse citationsPrimary public record · 100%

16The FTC alleged that Amazon enrolled consumers in Prime without consent and knowingly made cancellation difficult through manipulative enrollment and cancellation flows.

Subscription Capture Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 9, 2026

AI scaffold

FTC Amazon Prime dark patterns actionPrimary public record · 100%

17OpenLobby records AMAZON.COM lobbying on transportation, tax, government issues, trade, labor, small-business policy, and other issues with about $2.1M in spending across 31 filings; the reviewed filings document private institutional lobbying over public rules rather than a public-interest advocacy role.

Policy Capture Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

OpenLobby — AMAZON.COM lobbying profileGeneral web source · 58%

18The FTC alleged Amazon used dark patterns in Prime enrollment and cancellation, making the price and renewal consequences of Prime harder for consumers to refuse or escape.

Price Manipulation Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 13, 2026

AI scaffold

FTC: Amazon Prime dark-pattern enrollment and cancellation actionPrimary public record · 100%

19Amazon receives the Private Government badge because it combines large-scale private rule-setting over customers, workers, users, members, or counterparties with OpenLobby-documented lobbying of about $2.1M on public policy issues.

Private Government Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

OpenLobby — AMAZON.COM lobbying profileGeneral web source · 58%

Alternatives

BQUALIFIED44 Ace Hardware retailer-owned hardware cooperative · same market BQUALIFIED43 Do it Best member-owned hardware cooperative · same market BQUALIFIED42 Dr. Bronner's private benefit corporation · same market BQUALIFIED47 John Lewis Partnership employee-owned retailer · United Kingdom BQUALIFIED45 Second Use Building Materials employee-owned building-material salvage business · Washington, Pacific Northwest

Competitors

BQUALIFIED44 Ace Hardware retailer-owned hardware cooperative · same market BQUALIFIED43 Do it Best member-owned hardware cooperative · same market BQUALIFIED42 Dr. Bronner's private benefit corporation · same market CPERFORMATIVE41 Patagonia private company · same market CPERFORMATIVE38 REI Co-op consumer cooperative · same market CPERFORMATIVE37 Taylor Guitars private instrument maker · same market DEXTRACTIVE34 Framework Computer private repairable-electronics company · same market DEXTRACTIVE34 Grove Collaborative public benefit household-products company · same market

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for Amazon Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

May 7, 2026 at 12:00 AM UTC ai-scaffolding youth-capture-assessment

Added source-backed Youth Capture penalty -4 based on evidence specific to youth data, child-directed marketing, loot-box/gambling-like monetization, or youth-culture manipulation.

May 6, 2026 at 12:00 AM UTC ai-scaffolding toxic-products-assessment

Added tentative AI-generated Toxic Products penalty -1 and directory value for current toxic, addictive, pesticide, livestock, chemical, or consumer-safety product exposure.

May 5, 2026 at 12:00 AM UTC ai_scaffolding score

Published tentative AI-generated scaffolding score 7 for initial human review under gcd-rubric-v1.

May 4, 2026 at 10:31 PM UTC founder score

Published featured launch score based on antitrust, labor safety, dark-pattern, and shareholder-governance claims.

View Full Audit Log