professional association

American Psychiatric Association

A national psychiatric professional association and DSM publisher that provides clinical, publishing, policy, and advocacy infrastructure for psychiatry, including formal support for involuntary outpatient commitment under specified conditions. American Psychiatric Association scores low because of documented human harm, coercive violence, and person-dependent governance, with weak accountability reinforcing the negative evaluation.

Why this matters: The psychiatric profession is not just a care field; its diagnostic and policy infrastructure helps decide when people can be labeled, detained, medicated, researched, or treated without consent.

Letter grade F Malignant High confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1 Last reviewed May 7, 2026

Final Score -11* F - Malignant

FMALIGNANT-11 pts

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material20

Bonus+0

Cap41Ownership <= 4 and Governance <= 4

After Cap20

Penalties-31

!Not Verified

Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Evaluation Overview

F - Malignant

The score turns mainly on Ownership, with the largest penalty coming from Human Harm.

Strengths

Ownership3/10
Governance3/10
Extraction3/10

Penalties

Human Harm-10
Coercive Violence-8
Reversibility-5
Policy Capture-3

Evidence state

ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessPartial (AI)
Linked claims15
Direct axis claims15
Coverage15/15

Scoring Axes

Axis	Score	Why this score
Ownership ? Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.	3 / 10	APA is a professional psychiatric association whose policy and DSM infrastructure is governed through professional association structures rather than direct control by affected patients or psychiatric survivors. APA is a professional psychiatric association whose policy and DSM infrastructure is governed through professional association structures rather than direct control by affected patients or psychiatric survivors. That keeps American Psychiatric Association low on Ownership: decisive control remains with shareholders, private owners, executives, or state insiders rather than affected people. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 100 scored entries below, 9 tied, 117 above on Ownership. Linked evidence context APA is a professional psychiatric association whose policy and DSM infrastructure is governed through professional association structures rather than direct control by affected patients or psychiatric survivors. [1] context APA publishes the DSM-5-TR, presented by APA as the standard U.S. classification used by mental-health professionals, giving the association substantial diagnostic-category authority over patient identity and institutional treatment pathways. [2] context APA official policy recognizes involuntary outpatient commitment and assisted outpatient treatment as useful tools for selected people with severe mental illness, while acknowledging the autonomy-beneficence tension of court-ordered treatment. [3] The American Psychiatric Association is a professional psychiatric association whose DSM and policy authority is governed by psychiatric professionals rather than psychiatric survivors or patients. [4]
Governance ? Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.	3 / 10	APA is a professional psychiatric association whose policy and DSM infrastructure is governed through professional association structures rather than direct control by affected patients or psychiatric survivors. APA is a professional psychiatric association whose policy and DSM infrastructure is governed through professional association structures rather than direct control by affected patients or psychiatric survivors. That keeps American Psychiatric Association low on Governance: ordinary users, workers, customers, or affected communities cannot change the rules that govern them. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 94 scored entries below, 13 tied, 119 above on Governance. Uncertainty Priority page: add more axis-specific research over time to make the comparative placement harder to dispute. Linked evidence APA is a professional psychiatric association whose policy and DSM infrastructure is governed through professional association structures rather than direct control by affected patients or psychiatric survivors. [1] context APA publishes the DSM-5-TR, presented by APA as the standard U.S. classification used by mental-health professionals, giving the association substantial diagnostic-category authority over patient identity and institutional treatment pathways. [2] context APA official policy recognizes involuntary outpatient commitment and assisted outpatient treatment as useful tools for selected people with severe mental illness, while acknowledging the autonomy-beneficence tension of court-ordered treatment. [3]
Extraction ? Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.	3 / 10	APA is a professional psychiatric association whose policy and DSM infrastructure is governed through professional association structures rather than direct control by affected patients or psychiatric survivors. APA is a professional psychiatric association whose policy and DSM infrastructure is governed through professional association structures rather than direct control by affected patients or psychiatric survivors. That keeps American Psychiatric Association low on Extraction: the business model makes extraction from workers, users, suppliers, customers, or the public central rather than incidental. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 39 scored entries below, 22 tied, 165 above on Extraction. Linked evidence context APA is a professional psychiatric association whose policy and DSM infrastructure is governed through professional association structures rather than direct control by affected patients or psychiatric survivors. [1] context APA publishes the DSM-5-TR, presented by APA as the standard U.S. classification used by mental-health professionals, giving the association substantial diagnostic-category authority over patient identity and institutional treatment pathways. [2] context APA official policy recognizes involuntary outpatient commitment and assisted outpatient treatment as useful tools for selected people with severe mental illness, while acknowledging the autonomy-beneficence tension of court-ordered treatment. [3] APA diagnostic and treatment-policy infrastructure creates professional value, but DSM authority and support for involuntary outpatient commitment allow professional systems to extract compliance from people subject to psychiatric power. [5]
Labor Sovereignty ? Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.	2 / 7	APA is a professional psychiatric association whose policy and DSM infrastructure is governed through professional association structures rather than direct control by affected patients or psychiatric survivors. APA is a professional psychiatric association whose policy and DSM infrastructure is governed through professional association structures rather than direct control by affected patients or psychiatric survivors. That keeps American Psychiatric Association low on Labor Sovereignty: labor remains managerially controlled, replaceable, or exposed to coercive employment and contracting conditions. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 8 scored entries below, 36 tied, 182 above on Labor Sovereignty. Linked evidence context APA is a professional psychiatric association whose policy and DSM infrastructure is governed through professional association structures rather than direct control by affected patients or psychiatric survivors. [1] context APA publishes the DSM-5-TR, presented by APA as the standard U.S. classification used by mental-health professionals, giving the association substantial diagnostic-category authority over patient identity and institutional treatment pathways. [2] context APA official policy recognizes involuntary outpatient commitment and assisted outpatient treatment as useful tools for selected people with severe mental illness, while acknowledging the autonomy-beneficence tension of court-ordered treatment. [3] APA public materials show professional control over psychiatric classification and treatment policy, not worker, patient, or survivor sovereignty over coercive clinical systems. [6]
Solidarity with the Unemployed ? Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.	1 / 7	APA is a professional psychiatric association whose policy and DSM infrastructure is governed through professional association structures rather than direct control by affected patients or psychiatric survivors. APA is a professional psychiatric association whose policy and DSM infrastructure is governed through professional association structures rather than direct control by affected patients or psychiatric survivors. That keeps American Psychiatric Association low on Solidarity with the Unemployed: the model provides little protection for people who leave, are excluded, or cannot bargain from employment. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 3 scored entries below, 27 tied, 196 above on Solidarity with the Unemployed. Linked evidence context APA is a professional psychiatric association whose policy and DSM infrastructure is governed through professional association structures rather than direct control by affected patients or psychiatric survivors. [1] context APA publishes the DSM-5-TR, presented by APA as the standard U.S. classification used by mental-health professionals, giving the association substantial diagnostic-category authority over patient identity and institutional treatment pathways. [2] context APA official policy recognizes involuntary outpatient commitment and assisted outpatient treatment as useful tools for selected people with severe mental illness, while acknowledging the autonomy-beneficence tension of court-ordered treatment. [3] APA resources can standardize psychiatric care, but the sourced record does not show structural solidarity with people made unemployed, unhoused, or excluded by psychiatric labeling and coercion. [7]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity ? Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.	2 / 7	APA is a professional psychiatric association whose policy and DSM infrastructure is governed through professional association structures rather than direct control by affected patients or psychiatric survivors. APA is a professional psychiatric association whose policy and DSM infrastructure is governed through professional association structures rather than direct control by affected patients or psychiatric survivors. That keeps American Psychiatric Association low on Loss-Bearing Fidelity: losses, hazards, or adjustment costs are routinely pushed onto workers, customers, suppliers, communities, or the public. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 33 scored entries below, 14 tied, 179 above on Loss-Bearing Fidelity. Linked evidence context APA is a professional psychiatric association whose policy and DSM infrastructure is governed through professional association structures rather than direct control by affected patients or psychiatric survivors. [1] context APA publishes the DSM-5-TR, presented by APA as the standard U.S. classification used by mental-health professionals, giving the association substantial diagnostic-category authority over patient identity and institutional treatment pathways. [2] context APA official policy recognizes involuntary outpatient commitment and assisted outpatient treatment as useful tools for selected people with severe mental illness, while acknowledging the autonomy-beneficence tension of court-ordered treatment. [3] APA support for involuntary outpatient commitment shifts heavy liberty and treatment risks onto patients while preserving professional authority to define the intervention as care. [8]
Market Conduct ? Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.	2 / 5	APA is a professional psychiatric association whose policy and DSM infrastructure is governed through professional association structures rather than direct control by affected patients or psychiatric survivors. APA is a professional psychiatric association whose policy and DSM infrastructure is governed through professional association structures rather than direct control by affected patients or psychiatric survivors. That places American Psychiatric Association in the middle of Market Conduct: the product has real value but still uses meaningful lock-in, gatekeeping, market power, or dependency. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 31 scored entries below, 22 tied, 173 above on Market Conduct. Linked evidence context APA is a professional psychiatric association whose policy and DSM infrastructure is governed through professional association structures rather than direct control by affected patients or psychiatric survivors. [1] context APA publishes the DSM-5-TR, presented by APA as the standard U.S. classification used by mental-health professionals, giving the association substantial diagnostic-category authority over patient identity and institutional treatment pathways. [2] context APA official policy recognizes involuntary outpatient commitment and assisted outpatient treatment as useful tools for selected people with severe mental illness, while acknowledging the autonomy-beneficence tension of court-ordered treatment. [3] APA’s DSM and policy infrastructure shape insurance, clinical, court, and treatment markets, so market conduct depends on professional categories that affected people cannot easily refuse. [9]
Product Integrity ? Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.	2 / 5	APA is a professional psychiatric association whose policy and DSM infrastructure is governed through professional association structures rather than direct control by affected patients or psychiatric survivors. APA is a professional psychiatric association whose policy and DSM infrastructure is governed through professional association structures rather than direct control by affected patients or psychiatric survivors. That places American Psychiatric Association in the middle of Product Integrity: the product has real use value but is compromised by incentives, monetization, lock-in, quality degradation, or risk. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 23 scored entries below, 13 tied, 190 above on Product Integrity. Linked evidence context APA is a professional psychiatric association whose policy and DSM infrastructure is governed through professional association structures rather than direct control by affected patients or psychiatric survivors. [1] context APA publishes the DSM-5-TR, presented by APA as the standard U.S. classification used by mental-health professionals, giving the association substantial diagnostic-category authority over patient identity and institutional treatment pathways. [2] context APA official policy recognizes involuntary outpatient commitment and assisted outpatient treatment as useful tools for selected people with severe mental illness, while acknowledging the autonomy-beneficence tension of court-ordered treatment. [3] APA diagnostic publishing and practice guidance are useful to clinicians, but product integrity is weakened by DSM identity power and policy support for coercive treatment. [10]
Scale Integrity ? Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.	2 / 5	APA is a professional psychiatric association whose policy and DSM infrastructure is governed through professional association structures rather than direct control by affected patients or psychiatric survivors. APA is a professional psychiatric association whose policy and DSM infrastructure is governed through professional association structures rather than direct control by affected patients or psychiatric survivors. That places American Psychiatric Association in the middle of Scale Integrity: scale brings useful reach but also weakens accountability, transparency, or local constraint. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 31 scored entries below, 18 tied, 177 above on Scale Integrity. Linked evidence context APA is a professional psychiatric association whose policy and DSM infrastructure is governed through professional association structures rather than direct control by affected patients or psychiatric survivors. [1] context APA publishes the DSM-5-TR, presented by APA as the standard U.S. classification used by mental-health professionals, giving the association substantial diagnostic-category authority over patient identity and institutional treatment pathways. [2] context APA official policy recognizes involuntary outpatient commitment and assisted outpatient treatment as useful tools for selected people with severe mental illness, while acknowledging the autonomy-beneficence tension of court-ordered treatment. [3] APA’s DSM and involuntary-treatment policy influence psychiatric systems nationally, so coercive or identity-capturing assumptions scale through hospitals, courts, insurers, and schools. [11]

Penalties

Penalty	Applied	Why this penalty
Reversibility ? Applied when positive conduct depends on current living leaders, founders, family owners, or other person-contingent governance rather than durable structure. Range: -5 to 0.	-5	APA evidence shows professional policy and publishing authority, not locked democratic control by psychiatric survivors or affected patients; any beneficial conduct remains reversible by professional governance. APA evidence shows professional policy and publishing authority, not locked democratic control by psychiatric survivors or affected patients; any beneficial conduct remains reversible by professional governance. That warrants a severe Reversibility penalty because favorable conduct depends on current people or discretionary leadership rather than locked stakeholder structure. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 0 scored entries below, 95 tied, 131 above on Reversibility. Linked evidence APA evidence shows professional policy and publishing authority, not locked democratic control by psychiatric survivors or affected patients; any beneficial conduct remains reversible by professional governance. [12]
Human Harm ? Severity, scale, culpability, vulnerable targets, willful reoffense, reputation laundering, pattern escalation, and time decay. Range: -20 to 0.	-10	APA provides evidence for the relevant scoring judgmentd against WHO and UN rights guidance that treats coercive mental-health practices as serious rights risks and calls for person-centred, rights-based alternatives. APA provides evidence for the relevant scoring judgmentd against WHO and UN rights guidance that treats coercive mental-health practices as serious rights risks and calls for person-centred, rights-based alternatives. That warrants a substantial Human Harm penalty because ordinary operation, documented misconduct, or institutional power creates serious injury, deprivation, abuse, or foreseeable human damage. The value is substantial but not at the floor because the linked record shows serious conduct without the strongest aggravating factors on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 24 scored entries below, 6 tied, 196 above on Human Harm. Linked evidence APA provides evidence for the relevant scoring judgmentd against WHO and UN rights guidance that treats coercive mental-health practices as serious rights risks and calls for person-centred, rights-based alternatives. [13]
Coercive Violence ? Direct or institutionally enabled killing, torture, detention abuse, armed repression, forced displacement, violent domination, or nonconsensual crisis-line emergency escalation that exposes callers to confinement or force. Range: -30 to 0.	-8	APA official policy recognizes involuntary outpatient commitment and assisted outpatient treatment as useful tools for selected people with severe mental illness, while acknowledging the autonomy-beneficence tension of court-ordered treatment. APA official policy recognizes involuntary outpatient commitment and assisted outpatient treatment as useful tools for selected people with severe mental illness, while acknowledging the autonomy-beneficence tension of court-ordered treatment. That warrants a limited Coercive Violence penalty because the institution uses, enables, profits from, or materially supports violent domination, detention abuse, war, or armed coercion. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 12 scored entries below, 1 tied, 213 above on Coercive Violence. Linked evidence APA official policy recognizes involuntary outpatient commitment and assisted outpatient treatment as useful tools for selected people with severe mental illness, while acknowledging the autonomy-beneficence tension of court-ordered treatment. [3]
Policy Capture ? Private-interest attempts to bend law, regulation, subsidies, taxes, enforcement, trade, labor, safety, competition, environmental, healthcare, housing, surveillance, civil-liberties, or consumer policy against workers, customers, citizens, affected communities, or ecological life. Public-interest advocacy is not penalized merely because it is lobbying. Range: -15 to 0.	-3	OpenLobby records AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION lobbying on healthcare with about $160K in spending across 6 filings; the reviewed filings document private institutional lobbying over public rules rather than a public-interest advocacy role. OpenLobby records AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION lobbying on healthcare with about $160K in spending across 6 filings; the reviewed filings document private institutional lobbying over public rules rather than a public-interest advocacy role. That warrants a limited Policy Capture penalty because private institutional pressure is being applied to public rules while affected people cannot democratically govern that agenda. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Linked evidence OpenLobby records AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION lobbying on healthcare with about $160K in spending across 6 filings; the reviewed filings document private institutional lobbying over public rules rather than a public-interest advocacy role. [15]
Identity Capture ? Customer pressure, employee pressure, and pervasive identity saturation. Range: -3 to 0.	-3	APA publishes the DSM-5-TR, presented by APA as the standard U.S. classification used by mental-health professionals, giving the association substantial diagnostic-category authority over patient identity and institutional treatment pathways. APA publishes the DSM-5-TR, presented by APA as the standard U.S. classification used by mental-health professionals, giving the association substantial diagnostic-category authority over patient identity and institutional treatment pathways. That warrants a severe Identity Capture penalty because users, workers, customers, or publics are pressured into identity attachment that protects institutional power. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 0 scored entries below, 12 tied, 214 above on Identity Capture. Linked evidence APA publishes the DSM-5-TR, presented by APA as the standard U.S. classification used by mental-health professionals, giving the association substantial diagnostic-category authority over patient identity and institutional treatment pathways. [2]
Ideological Disavowal ? Concealed ideology presented as neutrality, expertise, professional necessity, public-service administration, market inevitability, or non-ideological common sense while exercising power. Range: -3 to 0.	-2	American Psychiatric Association's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because American Psychiatric Association exercises meaningful institutional or cultural power… American Psychiatric Association's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because American Psychiatric Association exercises meaningful institutional or cultural power while strongly presenting contested choices as neutral expertise, safety, objectivity, professionalism, administrative necessity, or public. That warrants a substantial Ideological Disavowal penalty because the institution presents situated, contested choices as neutrality, expertise, inevitability, safety, or common sense. The value is substantial but not at the floor because the linked record shows serious conduct without the strongest aggravating factors on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Ideological Disavowal 0 to -3 recalibration: 0 for explicit standpoint or no penalty-level neutrality theater; -1 for bounded softening of contested choices; -2 for strong neutrality theater by a powerful institution; -3 for major gatekeeping or coercive power presented as neutral, necessary, objective, or non-ideological. Uncertainty This recalibration uses public self-presentation and profile evidence; later review should add direct language-analysis evidence for high-impact institutions. Linked evidence American Psychiatric Association's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because American Psychiatric Association exercises meaningful institutional or cultural power while strongly presenting contested choices as neutral expertise, safety, objectivity, professionalism, administrative necessity, or public service. [14]

Bonus Credits

No bonus credits applied in this version.

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

High 82/100

15 verified linked claims 15 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 15/15 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 14/20

15 verified linked claims

Source quality 15/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 14/18

15 direct claims across 15 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 10/10

15/15 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending

VerificationUnverified

ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)

ThoroughnessPartial (AI)

Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.

Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

1APA is a professional psychiatric association whose policy and DSM infrastructure is governed through professional association structures rather than direct control by affected patients or psychiatric survivors.

Governance Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 7, 2026

American Psychiatric Association DSM-5-TRGeneral web source · 58%
American Psychiatric Association position statement on involuntary outpatient commitmentGeneral web source · 58%

2APA publishes the DSM-5-TR, presented by APA as the standard U.S. classification used by mental-health professionals, giving the association substantial diagnostic-category authority over patient identity and institutional treatment pathways.

Identity Capture Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 7, 2026

American Psychiatric Association DSM-5-TRGeneral web source · 58%

3APA official policy recognizes involuntary outpatient commitment and assisted outpatient treatment as useful tools for selected people with severe mental illness, while acknowledging the autonomy-beneficence tension of court-ordered treatment.

Coercive Violence Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 7, 2026

American Psychiatric Association position statement on involuntary outpatient commitmentGeneral web source · 58%

4The American Psychiatric Association is a professional psychiatric association whose DSM and policy authority is governed by psychiatric professionals rather than psychiatric survivors or patients.

Ownership Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

American Psychiatric Association DSM-5-TRGeneral web source · 58%
American Psychiatric Association position statement on involuntary outpatient commitmentGeneral web source · 58%
WHO guidance on community mental health services: person-centred and rights-based approachesPrimary public record · 100%
UN Special Rapporteur report on torture and disability-related coercive practicesGeneral web source · 58%
American Psychiatric Association official siteGeneral web source · 58%
OpenLobby — AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION lobbying profileGeneral web source · 58%

5APA diagnostic and treatment-policy infrastructure creates professional value, but DSM authority and support for involuntary outpatient commitment allow professional systems to extract compliance from people subject to psychiatric power.

Extraction Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

American Psychiatric Association DSM-5-TRGeneral web source · 58%
American Psychiatric Association position statement on involuntary outpatient commitmentGeneral web source · 58%
WHO guidance on community mental health services: person-centred and rights-based approachesPrimary public record · 100%
UN Special Rapporteur report on torture and disability-related coercive practicesGeneral web source · 58%
American Psychiatric Association official siteGeneral web source · 58%
OpenLobby — AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION lobbying profileGeneral web source · 58%

6APA public materials show professional control over psychiatric classification and treatment policy, not worker, patient, or survivor sovereignty over coercive clinical systems.

Labor Sovereignty Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

American Psychiatric Association DSM-5-TRGeneral web source · 58%
American Psychiatric Association position statement on involuntary outpatient commitmentGeneral web source · 58%
WHO guidance on community mental health services: person-centred and rights-based approachesPrimary public record · 100%
UN Special Rapporteur report on torture and disability-related coercive practicesGeneral web source · 58%
American Psychiatric Association official siteGeneral web source · 58%
OpenLobby — AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION lobbying profileGeneral web source · 58%

7APA resources can standardize psychiatric care, but the sourced record does not show structural solidarity with people made unemployed, unhoused, or excluded by psychiatric labeling and coercion.

Solidarity Unemployed Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

American Psychiatric Association DSM-5-TRGeneral web source · 58%
American Psychiatric Association position statement on involuntary outpatient commitmentGeneral web source · 58%
WHO guidance on community mental health services: person-centred and rights-based approachesPrimary public record · 100%
UN Special Rapporteur report on torture and disability-related coercive practicesGeneral web source · 58%
American Psychiatric Association official siteGeneral web source · 58%
OpenLobby — AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION lobbying profileGeneral web source · 58%

8APA support for involuntary outpatient commitment shifts heavy liberty and treatment risks onto patients while preserving professional authority to define the intervention as care.

Loss Bearing Fidelity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

American Psychiatric Association DSM-5-TRGeneral web source · 58%
American Psychiatric Association position statement on involuntary outpatient commitmentGeneral web source · 58%
WHO guidance on community mental health services: person-centred and rights-based approachesPrimary public record · 100%
UN Special Rapporteur report on torture and disability-related coercive practicesGeneral web source · 58%
American Psychiatric Association official siteGeneral web source · 58%
OpenLobby — AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION lobbying profileGeneral web source · 58%

9APA’s DSM and policy infrastructure shape insurance, clinical, court, and treatment markets, so market conduct depends on professional categories that affected people cannot easily refuse.

Market Conduct Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

American Psychiatric Association DSM-5-TRGeneral web source · 58%
American Psychiatric Association position statement on involuntary outpatient commitmentGeneral web source · 58%
WHO guidance on community mental health services: person-centred and rights-based approachesPrimary public record · 100%
UN Special Rapporteur report on torture and disability-related coercive practicesGeneral web source · 58%
American Psychiatric Association official siteGeneral web source · 58%
OpenLobby — AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION lobbying profileGeneral web source · 58%

10APA diagnostic publishing and practice guidance are useful to clinicians, but product integrity is weakened by DSM identity power and policy support for coercive treatment.

Product Integrity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

American Psychiatric Association DSM-5-TRGeneral web source · 58%
American Psychiatric Association position statement on involuntary outpatient commitmentGeneral web source · 58%
WHO guidance on community mental health services: person-centred and rights-based approachesPrimary public record · 100%
UN Special Rapporteur report on torture and disability-related coercive practicesGeneral web source · 58%
American Psychiatric Association official siteGeneral web source · 58%
OpenLobby — AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION lobbying profileGeneral web source · 58%

11APA’s DSM and involuntary-treatment policy influence psychiatric systems nationally, so coercive or identity-capturing assumptions scale through hospitals, courts, insurers, and schools.

Scale Integrity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

American Psychiatric Association DSM-5-TRGeneral web source · 58%
American Psychiatric Association position statement on involuntary outpatient commitmentGeneral web source · 58%
WHO guidance on community mental health services: person-centred and rights-based approachesPrimary public record · 100%
UN Special Rapporteur report on torture and disability-related coercive practicesGeneral web source · 58%
American Psychiatric Association official siteGeneral web source · 58%
OpenLobby — AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION lobbying profileGeneral web source · 58%

12APA evidence shows professional policy and publishing authority, not locked democratic control by psychiatric survivors or affected patients; any beneficial conduct remains reversible by professional governance.

Reversibility Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 7, 2026

American Psychiatric Association position statement on involuntary outpatient commitmentGeneral web source · 58%
American Psychiatric Association DSM-5-TRGeneral web source · 58%

13APA provides evidence for the relevant scoring judgmentd against WHO and UN rights guidance that treats coercive mental-health practices as serious rights risks and calls for person-centred, rights-based alternatives.

Human Harm Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 7, 2026

American Psychiatric Association position statement on involuntary outpatient commitmentGeneral web source · 58%
WHO guidance on community mental health services: person-centred and rights-based approachesPrimary public record · 100%
UN Special Rapporteur report on torture and disability-related coercive practicesGeneral web source · 58%

14American Psychiatric Association's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because American Psychiatric Association exercises meaningful institutional or cultural power while strongly presenting contested choices as neutral expertise, safety, objectivity, professionalism, administrative necessity, or public service.

Ideological Disavowal Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 9, 2026

AI scaffold

American Psychiatric Association official siteGeneral web source · 58%
American Psychiatric Association DSM-5-TRGeneral web source · 58%
American Psychiatric Association position statement on involuntary outpatient commitmentGeneral web source · 58%

15OpenLobby records AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION lobbying on healthcare with about $160K in spending across 6 filings; the reviewed filings document private institutional lobbying over public rules rather than a public-interest advocacy role.

Policy Capture Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

OpenLobby — AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION lobbying profileGeneral web source · 58%

Alternatives

Competitors

AGOOD66 People USA Rose Houses peer respite network · same market AGOOD66 Promise Resource Network Retreat peer-run respite · same market AGOOD66 Wildflower Alliance Afiya Peer Respite peer-run respite · same market AGOOD63 Trans Lifeline trans peer-support hotline · same market AGOOD61 CSPNJ Wellness Respite Services peer-operated respite network · same market AGOOD61 Georgia Peer Support and Wellness Respite Centers peer respite network · same market AGOOD61 Juniper Peer-Run Respite peer-run respite · same market AGOOD61 Karaya Peer Respite peer-run respite · same market

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for American Psychiatric Association Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

May 7, 2026 at 12:00 AM UTC ai-scaffolding seed-added

Added psychiatric, professional-ethics, coercive psychiatric-system, peer-respite, or psychiatric-survivor alternative institution with source-backed claims and full score components.

View Full Audit Log