C.G. Jung Institute of New York

Jungian psychoanalytic training institute and affordable therapy center

C.G. Jung Institute of New York

Industry Mental Health

A New York Jungian psychoanalytic institute offering training, scholarship, and an affordable therapy center with in-person analyst-in-training treatment. It scores well because sliding-scale access, supervised training, and a clear institutional referral path make depth therapy less purely private, though the evidence remains institution-self-reported and not a labor or ownership audit.

Why this matters: Jungian analysis is often hard to find, expensive, and opaque; referral and low-fee institute clinics can make the field more accountable to ordinary clients.

Letter grade A Good Medium confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1

Final Score 55* A - Good

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material51
Bonus+4
Cap66No structure cap
After Cap55
Penalties0
!Not Verified
Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Evaluation Overview

A - Good

The score turns mainly on Extraction; no penalty currently dominates the evaluation.

Strengths

  • Extraction7/10
  • Ownership6/10
  • Governance6/10

Penalties

  • No penalties applied in this version.

Evidence state

  • ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)
  • ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
  • Linked claims12
  • Direct axis claims12
  • Coverage12/12

Scoring Axes

Axis Score Why this score
Ownership
?
Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.
6 / 10

The institute presents itself as an institute rather than a venture-backed therapy platform, with a public address, office contact, and donation-supported institutional presence.

Calibration notes

Comparative anchor: Jungian analysis US/Canada pass: regional accredited analyst organizations and low-fee/referral institutes are evaluated against professional standards, access, fee clarity, and platform-extraction risk rather than corporate scale alone.

Uncertainty
  • This pass relies mostly on official organization pages and directory records; later review should add regulator, client-contract, fee, labor, and complaint-record evidence where available.
Linked evidence
  • The institute presents itself as an institute rather than a venture-backed therapy platform, with a public address, office contact, and donation-supported institutional presence. [1]
Governance
?
Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.
6 / 10

The institute describes a training process using experienced analysts, supervision, personal analysis, and professional formation rather than casual self-labeling.

Calibration notes

Comparative anchor: Jungian analysis US/Canada pass: regional accredited analyst organizations and low-fee/referral institutes are evaluated against professional standards, access, fee clarity, and platform-extraction risk rather than corporate scale alone.

Uncertainty
  • This pass relies mostly on official organization pages and directory records; later review should add regulator, client-contract, fee, labor, and complaint-record evidence where available.
Linked evidence
  • The institute describes a training process using experienced analysts, supervision, personal analysis, and professional formation rather than casual self-labeling. [2]
Extraction
?
Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.
7 / 10

The affordable therapy center says it keeps depth work accessible through sliding-scale fees and analyst-in-training treatment, reducing the extraction risk common in private-pay therapy.

Calibration notes

Comparative anchor: Jungian analysis US/Canada pass: regional accredited analyst organizations and low-fee/referral institutes are evaluated against professional standards, access, fee clarity, and platform-extraction risk rather than corporate scale alone.

Uncertainty
  • This pass relies mostly on official organization pages and directory records; later review should add regulator, client-contract, fee, labor, and complaint-record evidence where available.
Linked evidence
  • The affordable therapy center says it keeps depth work accessible through sliding-scale fees and analyst-in-training treatment, reducing the extraction risk common in private-pay therapy. [3]
Labor Sovereignty
?
Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.
5 / 7

The program places clinical work under supervision and professional formation, which gives practitioners a defined training structure rather than a gig-platform labor relation.

Calibration notes

Comparative anchor: Jungian analysis US/Canada pass: regional accredited analyst organizations and low-fee/referral institutes are evaluated against professional standards, access, fee clarity, and platform-extraction risk rather than corporate scale alone.

Uncertainty
  • This pass relies mostly on official organization pages and directory records; later review should add regulator, client-contract, fee, labor, and complaint-record evidence where available.
Linked evidence
  • The program places clinical work under supervision and professional formation, which gives practitioners a defined training structure rather than a gig-platform labor relation. [4]
Solidarity with the Unemployed
?
Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.
6 / 7

The affordable therapy center uses income documentation and fee setting to connect lower-income clients with analysis instead of serving only high-income private-pay clients.

Calibration notes

Comparative anchor: Jungian analysis US/Canada pass: regional accredited analyst organizations and low-fee/referral institutes are evaluated against professional standards, access, fee clarity, and platform-extraction risk rather than corporate scale alone.

Uncertainty
  • This pass relies mostly on official organization pages and directory records; later review should add regulator, client-contract, fee, labor, and complaint-record evidence where available.
Linked evidence
  • The affordable therapy center uses income documentation and fee setting to connect lower-income clients with analysis instead of serving only high-income private-pay clients. [5]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity
?
Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.
6 / 7

The institute maintains an affordable therapy path with intake, matching, and supervised treatment, which is a real institutional cost-bearing choice compared with referral-only private practice.

Calibration notes

Comparative anchor: Jungian analysis US/Canada pass: regional accredited analyst organizations and low-fee/referral institutes are evaluated against professional standards, access, fee clarity, and platform-extraction risk rather than corporate scale alone.

Uncertainty
  • This pass relies mostly on official organization pages and directory records; later review should add regulator, client-contract, fee, labor, and complaint-record evidence where available.
Linked evidence
  • The institute maintains an affordable therapy path with intake, matching, and supervised treatment, which is a real institutional cost-bearing choice compared with referral-only private practice. [6]
Market Conduct
?
Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.
5 / 5

The application path discloses a non-refundable application fee, income-based fee setting, and in-person treatment requirements before matching.

Calibration notes

Comparative anchor: Jungian analysis US/Canada pass: regional accredited analyst organizations and low-fee/referral institutes are evaluated against professional standards, access, fee clarity, and platform-extraction risk rather than corporate scale alone.

Uncertainty
  • This pass relies mostly on official organization pages and directory records; later review should add regulator, client-contract, fee, labor, and complaint-record evidence where available.
Linked evidence
  • The application path discloses a non-refundable application fee, income-based fee setting, and in-person treatment requirements before matching. [7]
Product Integrity
?
Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.
5 / 5

The public material ties the clinical product to Jungian analysis, personal analysis, clinical supervision, and analyst training rather than generic wellness branding.

Calibration notes

Comparative anchor: Jungian analysis US/Canada pass: regional accredited analyst organizations and low-fee/referral institutes are evaluated against professional standards, access, fee clarity, and platform-extraction risk rather than corporate scale alone.

Uncertainty
  • This pass relies mostly on official organization pages and directory records; later review should add regulator, client-contract, fee, labor, and complaint-record evidence where available.
Linked evidence
  • The public material ties the clinical product to Jungian analysis, personal analysis, clinical supervision, and analyst training rather than generic wellness branding. [8]
Scale Integrity
?
Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.
5 / 5

The work is anchored to one institute location and an institutional training program, so growth appears bounded by supervision and formation rather than mass platform expansion.

Calibration notes

Comparative anchor: Jungian analysis US/Canada pass: regional accredited analyst organizations and low-fee/referral institutes are evaluated against professional standards, access, fee clarity, and platform-extraction risk rather than corporate scale alone.

Uncertainty
  • This pass relies mostly on official organization pages and directory records; later review should add regulator, client-contract, fee, labor, and complaint-record evidence where available.
Linked evidence
  • The work is anchored to one institute location and an institutional training program, so growth appears bounded by supervision and formation rather than mass platform expansion. [9]

Penalties

No penalties applied in this version.

Bonus Credits

Bonus Credit Why this credit
Openness to Dissent
?
Credit for tolerating internal, user, customer, worker, and public dissent without retaliation, capture, or viewpoint laundering.
1 / 3

The public record for C.G.

Calibration notes

Comparative anchor: Jungian analysis US/Canada pass: regional accredited analyst organizations and low-fee/referral institutes are evaluated against professional standards, access, fee clarity, and platform-extraction risk rather than corporate scale alone.

Uncertainty
  • This pass relies mostly on official organization pages and directory records; later review should add regulator, client-contract, fee, labor, and complaint-record evidence where available.
Linked evidence
  • C.G. Jung Institute of New York publishes public education, referral, or professional-society information that lets clients and clinicians inspect the field rather than relying only on private word-of-mouth. [10]
Good Deal
?
Credit for unusually fair value: durable quality, fair pricing, low lock-in, and clear customer surplus.
2 / 3

The public record for C.G.

Calibration notes

Comparative anchor: Jungian analysis US/Canada pass: regional accredited analyst organizations and low-fee/referral institutes are evaluated against professional standards, access, fee clarity, and platform-extraction risk rather than corporate scale alone.

Uncertainty
  • This pass relies mostly on official organization pages and directory records; later review should add regulator, client-contract, fee, labor, and complaint-record evidence where available.
Linked evidence
  • C.G. Jung Institute of New York offers a low-fee or affordable therapy route in a field where private Jungian analysis is often difficult and expensive to access. [11]
Cost Transparency
?
Credit for clear posted prices, all-in fees, unit costs, public rate cards, margin/cost visibility, or surplus-allocation transparency, especially in markets where opaque quotes, hidden fees, or individualized pricing are normal.
1 / 3

The public record for C.G.

Calibration notes

Comparative anchor: Jungian analysis US/Canada pass: regional accredited analyst organizations and low-fee/referral institutes are evaluated against professional standards, access, fee clarity, and platform-extraction risk rather than corporate scale alone.

Uncertainty
  • This pass relies mostly on official organization pages and directory records; later review should add regulator, client-contract, fee, labor, and complaint-record evidence where available.
Linked evidence
  • C.G. Jung Institute of New York publishes practical intake and fee-setting information for its affordable or referral service, giving clients more price visibility than ordinary private-practice search. [12]

Confidence Basis

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

Medium 76/100

12 verified linked claims 12 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 12/12 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 13/20

12 verified linked claims

Source quality 10/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 14/18

12 direct claims across 12 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 16, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 10/10

12/12 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending
VerificationUnverified
ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.
Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.
1The institute presents itself as an institute rather than a venture-backed therapy platform, with a public address, office contact, and donation-supported institutional presence.

Ownership Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

2The institute describes a training process using experienced analysts, supervision, personal analysis, and professional formation rather than casual self-labeling.

Governance Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

3The affordable therapy center says it keeps depth work accessible through sliding-scale fees and analyst-in-training treatment, reducing the extraction risk common in private-pay therapy.

Extraction Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

4The program places clinical work under supervision and professional formation, which gives practitioners a defined training structure rather than a gig-platform labor relation.

Labor Sovereignty Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

5The affordable therapy center uses income documentation and fee setting to connect lower-income clients with analysis instead of serving only high-income private-pay clients.

Solidarity Unemployed Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

6The institute maintains an affordable therapy path with intake, matching, and supervised treatment, which is a real institutional cost-bearing choice compared with referral-only private practice.

Loss Bearing Fidelity Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

7The application path discloses a non-refundable application fee, income-based fee setting, and in-person treatment requirements before matching.

Market Conduct Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

8The public material ties the clinical product to Jungian analysis, personal analysis, clinical supervision, and analyst training rather than generic wellness branding.

Product Integrity Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

9The work is anchored to one institute location and an institutional training program, so growth appears bounded by supervision and formation rather than mass platform expansion.

Scale Integrity Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

10C.G. Jung Institute of New York publishes public education, referral, or professional-society information that lets clients and clinicians inspect the field rather than relying only on private word-of-mouth.

Openness To Dissent Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

11C.G. Jung Institute of New York offers a low-fee or affordable therapy route in a field where private Jungian analysis is often difficult and expensive to access.

Good Deal Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

12C.G. Jung Institute of New York publishes practical intake and fee-setting information for its affordable or referral service, giving clients more price visibility than ordinary private-practice search.

Cost Transparency Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

Alternatives

Competitors

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for C.G. Jung Institute of New York Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.

View Full Audit Log