Jungian psychoanalytic training institute and affordable therapy center
C.G. Jung Institute of New York
Industry Mental Health
A New York Jungian psychoanalytic institute offering training, scholarship, and an affordable therapy center with in-person analyst-in-training treatment. It scores well because sliding-scale access, supervised training, and a clear institutional referral path make depth therapy less purely private, though the evidence remains institution-self-reported and not a labor or ownership audit.
Why this matters: Jungian analysis is often hard to find, expensive, and opaque; referral and low-fee institute clinics can make the field more accountable to ordinary clients.
Letter grade A Good Medium confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1
* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.
Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.
Evaluation Overview
A - Good
The score turns mainly on Extraction; no penalty currently dominates the evaluation.
Strengths
- Extraction7/10
- Ownership6/10
- Governance6/10
Penalties
- No penalties applied in this version.
Evidence state
- ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)
- ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
- Linked claims12
- Direct axis claims12
- Coverage12/12
Scoring Axes
| Axis | Score | Why this score |
|---|---|---|
Ownership
?
Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control
at 10.
|
6 / 10 |
The institute presents itself as an institute rather than a venture-backed therapy platform, with a public address, office contact, and donation-supported institutional presence. Linked evidence
|
Governance
?
Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic
stakeholder control at 10.
|
6 / 10 |
The institute describes a training process using experienced analysts, supervision, personal analysis, and professional formation rather than casual self-labeling. Linked evidence
|
Extraction
?
Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured
extraction judgment.
|
7 / 10 |
The affordable therapy center says it keeps depth work accessible through sliding-scale fees and analyst-in-training treatment, reducing the extraction risk common in private-pay therapy. Linked evidence
|
Labor Sovereignty
?
Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at
7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence
shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling,
retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of
worker voice, or extreme turnover.
|
5 / 7 |
The program places clinical work under supervision and professional formation, which gives practitioners a defined training structure rather than a gig-platform labor relation. Linked evidence
|
Solidarity with the
Unemployed
?
Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment,
and non-competes.
|
6 / 7 |
The affordable therapy center uses income documentation and fee setting to connect lower-income clients with analysis instead of serving only high-income private-pay clients. Linked evidence
|
Loss-Bearing Fidelity
?
Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and
public obligations.
|
6 / 7 |
The institute maintains an affordable therapy path with intake, matching, and supervised treatment, which is a real institutional cost-bearing choice compared with referral-only private practice. Linked evidence
|
Market Conduct
?
Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.
|
5 / 5 |
The application path discloses a non-refundable application fee, income-based fee setting, and in-person treatment requirements before matching. Linked evidence
|
Product Integrity
?
Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.
|
5 / 5 |
The public material ties the clinical product to Jungian analysis, personal analysis, clinical supervision, and analyst training rather than generic wellness branding. Linked evidence
|
Scale Integrity
?
Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.
|
5 / 5 |
The work is anchored to one institute location and an institutional training program, so growth appears bounded by supervision and formation rather than mass platform expansion. Linked evidence
|
Penalties
No penalties applied in this version.
Bonus Credits
| Bonus | Credit | Why this credit |
|---|---|---|
Openness to Dissent
?
Credit for tolerating internal, user, customer, worker, and public
dissent without retaliation, capture, or viewpoint laundering.
|
1 / 3 |
The public record for C.G. Linked evidence
|
Good Deal
?
Credit for unusually fair value: durable quality, fair pricing, low
lock-in, and clear customer surplus.
|
2 / 3 |
The public record for C.G. Linked evidence
|
Cost Transparency
?
Credit for clear posted prices, all-in fees, unit costs, public rate
cards, margin/cost visibility, or surplus-allocation transparency,
especially in markets where opaque quotes, hidden fees, or
individualized pricing are normal.
|
1 / 3 |
The public record for C.G. Linked evidence
|
Confidence Basis
Confidence Basis
Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.
Medium 76/100
12 verified linked claims 12 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 12/12 components covered
This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.
Claim confidence 13/20
12 verified linked claims
Source quality 10/18
Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability
Direct axis-specific claims 14/18
12 direct claims across 12 active components
Dispute load 12/12
0 disputed claims on this entity
Recency 10/10
Newest accepted timestamp: May 16, 2026
Reviewer status 7/12
Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding
Component coverage 10/10
12/12 evidence-bearing components have direct support
Evidence State
Evidence State
Claims and Sources
Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.
* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.1The institute presents itself as an institute rather than a venture-backed therapy platform, with a public address, office contact, and donation-supported institutional presence.
- C.G. Jung Institute of New YorkGeneral web source · 58%
- C.G. Jung Institute of New York Affordable Therapy CenterGeneral web source · 58%
- Jungian.Directory: Jungian Analysts DirectoryGeneral web source · 58%
2The institute describes a training process using experienced analysts, supervision, personal analysis, and professional formation rather than casual self-labeling.
- C.G. Jung Institute of New YorkGeneral web source · 58%
- C.G. Jung Institute of New York Affordable Therapy CenterGeneral web source · 58%
- Jungian.Directory: Jungian Analysts DirectoryGeneral web source · 58%
3The affordable therapy center says it keeps depth work accessible through sliding-scale fees and analyst-in-training treatment, reducing the extraction risk common in private-pay therapy.
- C.G. Jung Institute of New YorkGeneral web source · 58%
- C.G. Jung Institute of New York Affordable Therapy CenterGeneral web source · 58%
- Jungian.Directory: Jungian Analysts DirectoryGeneral web source · 58%
4The program places clinical work under supervision and professional formation, which gives practitioners a defined training structure rather than a gig-platform labor relation.
- C.G. Jung Institute of New YorkGeneral web source · 58%
- C.G. Jung Institute of New York Affordable Therapy CenterGeneral web source · 58%
- Jungian.Directory: Jungian Analysts DirectoryGeneral web source · 58%
5The affordable therapy center uses income documentation and fee setting to connect lower-income clients with analysis instead of serving only high-income private-pay clients.
- C.G. Jung Institute of New YorkGeneral web source · 58%
- C.G. Jung Institute of New York Affordable Therapy CenterGeneral web source · 58%
- Jungian.Directory: Jungian Analysts DirectoryGeneral web source · 58%
6The institute maintains an affordable therapy path with intake, matching, and supervised treatment, which is a real institutional cost-bearing choice compared with referral-only private practice.
- C.G. Jung Institute of New YorkGeneral web source · 58%
- C.G. Jung Institute of New York Affordable Therapy CenterGeneral web source · 58%
- Jungian.Directory: Jungian Analysts DirectoryGeneral web source · 58%
7The application path discloses a non-refundable application fee, income-based fee setting, and in-person treatment requirements before matching.
- C.G. Jung Institute of New YorkGeneral web source · 58%
- C.G. Jung Institute of New York Affordable Therapy CenterGeneral web source · 58%
- Jungian.Directory: Jungian Analysts DirectoryGeneral web source · 58%
8The public material ties the clinical product to Jungian analysis, personal analysis, clinical supervision, and analyst training rather than generic wellness branding.
- C.G. Jung Institute of New YorkGeneral web source · 58%
- C.G. Jung Institute of New York Affordable Therapy CenterGeneral web source · 58%
- Jungian.Directory: Jungian Analysts DirectoryGeneral web source · 58%
9The work is anchored to one institute location and an institutional training program, so growth appears bounded by supervision and formation rather than mass platform expansion.
- C.G. Jung Institute of New YorkGeneral web source · 58%
- C.G. Jung Institute of New York Affordable Therapy CenterGeneral web source · 58%
- Jungian.Directory: Jungian Analysts DirectoryGeneral web source · 58%
10C.G. Jung Institute of New York publishes public education, referral, or professional-society information that lets clients and clinicians inspect the field rather than relying only on private word-of-mouth.
- C.G. Jung Institute of New YorkGeneral web source · 58%
- C.G. Jung Institute of New York Affordable Therapy CenterGeneral web source · 58%
- Jungian.Directory: Jungian Analysts DirectoryGeneral web source · 58%
11C.G. Jung Institute of New York offers a low-fee or affordable therapy route in a field where private Jungian analysis is often difficult and expensive to access.
- C.G. Jung Institute of New YorkGeneral web source · 58%
- C.G. Jung Institute of New York Affordable Therapy CenterGeneral web source · 58%
- Jungian.Directory: Jungian Analysts DirectoryGeneral web source · 58%
12C.G. Jung Institute of New York publishes practical intake and fee-setting information for its affordable or referral service, giving clients more price visibility than ordinary private-practice search.
- C.G. Jung Institute of New YorkGeneral web source · 58%
- C.G. Jung Institute of New York Affordable Therapy CenterGeneral web source · 58%
- Jungian.Directory: Jungian Analysts DirectoryGeneral web source · 58%
Help Improve This Profile
Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.
How This Page Is Maintained
Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.
Civic Note
Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.
Submit evidence for C.G. Jung Institute of New York Add one source-backed fact for review.
Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.
Audit Log
Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.
No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.
View Full Audit Log