Jungian institute, referral service, clinic, library, and journal publisher
C.G. Jung Institute of San Francisco
Industry Mental Health
A San Francisco Jungian institute with a low-fee psychotherapy center, free referral service, member analysts, public programs, library, ARAS access, and Jung Journal. It scores strongly because the public service stack makes certified Jungian work easier to inspect and access, while the profile still depends mostly on the institute’s own public descriptions.
Why this matters: Regional Jungian institutes can either protect a costly professional guild or make depth psychology more available; this one has unusually visible access, referral, and public-education infrastructure.
Letter grade A Good Medium confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1
* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.
Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.
Evaluation Overview
A - Good
The score turns mainly on Extraction; no penalty currently dominates the evaluation.
Strengths
- Extraction7/10
- Ownership6/10
- Governance6/10
Penalties
- No penalties applied in this version.
Evidence state
- ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)
- ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
- Linked claims12
- Direct axis claims12
- Coverage12/12
Scoring Axes
| Axis | Score | Why this score |
|---|---|---|
Ownership
?
Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control
at 10.
|
6 / 10 |
The institute presents itself as a regional institute with member analysts, a clinic, library, journal, public programs, and donation-supported institute infrastructure rather than private-equity ownership. Linked evidence
|
Governance
?
Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic
stakeholder control at 10.
|
6 / 10 |
The institute says its analysts are licensed, trained, certified in analytical work, and members of the International Association for Analytical Psychology. Linked evidence
|
Extraction
?
Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured
extraction judgment.
|
7 / 10 |
The Whitney Center is described as low-fee care for adults unable to afford private fees, and referral services are described as free and confidential. Linked evidence
|
Labor Sovereignty
?
Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at
7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence
shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling,
retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of
worker voice, or extreme turnover.
|
5 / 7 |
The institute relies on licensed analysts, candidates, training programs, and professional development rather than treating clinicians as anonymous lead-generation inventory. Linked evidence
|
Solidarity with the
Unemployed
?
Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment,
and non-competes.
|
6 / 7 |
The low-fee center specifically serves people unable to afford private fees and says its clientele includes students, artists, LGBTQ+ clients, and racially diverse Bay Area clients. Linked evidence
|
Loss-Bearing Fidelity
?
Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and
public obligations.
|
6 / 7 |
The institute supports low-fee clinic access, a free referral service, a research library, and public programs, which points to mission costs beyond private-session revenue. Linked evidence
|
Market Conduct
?
Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.
|
5 / 5 |
The service page discloses free referral access and a clinic contact path before a client enters private therapy matching. Linked evidence
|
Product Integrity
?
Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.
|
5 / 5 |
The service mix keeps Jungian analysis connected to licensed analysts, candidates, library resources, a peer-reviewed journal, and continuing education. Linked evidence
|
Scale Integrity
?
Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.
|
5 / 5 |
The organization remains regional and institution-centered, so expansion appears tied to training, referral, clinic, and education capacity rather than national therapy-platform scale. Linked evidence
|
Penalties
No penalties applied in this version.
Bonus Credits
| Bonus | Credit | Why this credit |
|---|---|---|
Openness to Dissent
?
Credit for tolerating internal, user, customer, worker, and public
dissent without retaliation, capture, or viewpoint laundering.
|
1 / 3 |
The public record for C.G. Linked evidence
|
Good Deal
?
Credit for unusually fair value: durable quality, fair pricing, low
lock-in, and clear customer surplus.
|
2 / 3 |
The public record for C.G. Linked evidence
|
Cost Transparency
?
Credit for clear posted prices, all-in fees, unit costs, public rate
cards, margin/cost visibility, or surplus-allocation transparency,
especially in markets where opaque quotes, hidden fees, or
individualized pricing are normal.
|
1 / 3 |
The public record for C.G. Linked evidence
|
Confidence Basis
Confidence Basis
Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.
Medium 76/100
12 verified linked claims 12 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 12/12 components covered
This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.
Claim confidence 13/20
12 verified linked claims
Source quality 10/18
Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability
Direct axis-specific claims 14/18
12 direct claims across 12 active components
Dispute load 12/12
0 disputed claims on this entity
Recency 10/10
Newest accepted timestamp: May 16, 2026
Reviewer status 7/12
Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding
Component coverage 10/10
12/12 evidence-bearing components have direct support
Evidence State
Evidence State
Claims and Sources
Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.
* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.1The institute presents itself as a regional institute with member analysts, a clinic, library, journal, public programs, and donation-supported institute infrastructure rather than private-equity ownership.
- C.G. Jung Institute of San Francisco ServicesGeneral web source · 58%
- Jungian.Directory: Jungian Analysts DirectoryGeneral web source · 58%
2The institute says its analysts are licensed, trained, certified in analytical work, and members of the International Association for Analytical Psychology.
- C.G. Jung Institute of San Francisco ServicesGeneral web source · 58%
- Jungian.Directory: Jungian Analysts DirectoryGeneral web source · 58%
3The Whitney Center is described as low-fee care for adults unable to afford private fees, and referral services are described as free and confidential.
- C.G. Jung Institute of San Francisco ServicesGeneral web source · 58%
- Jungian.Directory: Jungian Analysts DirectoryGeneral web source · 58%
4The institute relies on licensed analysts, candidates, training programs, and professional development rather than treating clinicians as anonymous lead-generation inventory.
- C.G. Jung Institute of San Francisco ServicesGeneral web source · 58%
- Jungian.Directory: Jungian Analysts DirectoryGeneral web source · 58%
5The low-fee center specifically serves people unable to afford private fees and says its clientele includes students, artists, LGBTQ+ clients, and racially diverse Bay Area clients.
- C.G. Jung Institute of San Francisco ServicesGeneral web source · 58%
- Jungian.Directory: Jungian Analysts DirectoryGeneral web source · 58%
6The institute supports low-fee clinic access, a free referral service, a research library, and public programs, which points to mission costs beyond private-session revenue.
- C.G. Jung Institute of San Francisco ServicesGeneral web source · 58%
- Jungian.Directory: Jungian Analysts DirectoryGeneral web source · 58%
7The service page discloses free referral access and a clinic contact path before a client enters private therapy matching.
- C.G. Jung Institute of San Francisco ServicesGeneral web source · 58%
- Jungian.Directory: Jungian Analysts DirectoryGeneral web source · 58%
8The service mix keeps Jungian analysis connected to licensed analysts, candidates, library resources, a peer-reviewed journal, and continuing education.
- C.G. Jung Institute of San Francisco ServicesGeneral web source · 58%
- Jungian.Directory: Jungian Analysts DirectoryGeneral web source · 58%
9The organization remains regional and institution-centered, so expansion appears tied to training, referral, clinic, and education capacity rather than national therapy-platform scale.
- C.G. Jung Institute of San Francisco ServicesGeneral web source · 58%
- Jungian.Directory: Jungian Analysts DirectoryGeneral web source · 58%
10C.G. Jung Institute of San Francisco publishes public education, referral, or professional-society information that lets clients and clinicians inspect the field rather than relying only on private word-of-mouth.
- C.G. Jung Institute of San Francisco ServicesGeneral web source · 58%
- Jungian.Directory: Jungian Analysts DirectoryGeneral web source · 58%
11C.G. Jung Institute of San Francisco offers a low-fee or affordable therapy route in a field where private Jungian analysis is often difficult and expensive to access.
- C.G. Jung Institute of San Francisco ServicesGeneral web source · 58%
- Jungian.Directory: Jungian Analysts DirectoryGeneral web source · 58%
12C.G. Jung Institute of San Francisco publishes practical intake and fee-setting information for its affordable or referral service, giving clients more price visibility than ordinary private-practice search.
- C.G. Jung Institute of San Francisco ServicesGeneral web source · 58%
- Jungian.Directory: Jungian Analysts DirectoryGeneral web source · 58%
Help Improve This Profile
Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.
How This Page Is Maintained
Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.
Civic Note
Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.
Submit evidence for C.G. Jung Institute of San Francisco Add one source-backed fact for review.
Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.
Audit Log
Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.
No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.
View Full Audit Log