C.G. Jung Institute of San Francisco

Jungian institute, referral service, clinic, library, and journal publisher

C.G. Jung Institute of San Francisco

Industry Mental Health

A San Francisco Jungian institute with a low-fee psychotherapy center, free referral service, member analysts, public programs, library, ARAS access, and Jung Journal. It scores strongly because the public service stack makes certified Jungian work easier to inspect and access, while the profile still depends mostly on the institute’s own public descriptions.

Why this matters: Regional Jungian institutes can either protect a costly professional guild or make depth psychology more available; this one has unusually visible access, referral, and public-education infrastructure.

Letter grade A Good Medium confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1

Final Score 55* A - Good

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material51
Bonus+4
Cap66No structure cap
After Cap55
Penalties0
!Not Verified
Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Evaluation Overview

A - Good

The score turns mainly on Extraction; no penalty currently dominates the evaluation.

Strengths

  • Extraction7/10
  • Ownership6/10
  • Governance6/10

Penalties

  • No penalties applied in this version.

Evidence state

  • ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)
  • ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
  • Linked claims12
  • Direct axis claims12
  • Coverage12/12

Scoring Axes

Axis Score Why this score
Ownership
?
Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.
6 / 10

The institute presents itself as a regional institute with member analysts, a clinic, library, journal, public programs, and donation-supported institute infrastructure rather than private-equity ownership.

Calibration notes

Comparative anchor: Jungian analysis US/Canada pass: regional accredited analyst organizations and low-fee/referral institutes are evaluated against professional standards, access, fee clarity, and platform-extraction risk rather than corporate scale alone.

Uncertainty
  • This pass relies mostly on official organization pages and directory records; later review should add regulator, client-contract, fee, labor, and complaint-record evidence where available.
Linked evidence
  • The institute presents itself as a regional institute with member analysts, a clinic, library, journal, public programs, and donation-supported institute infrastructure rather than private-equity ownership. [1]
Governance
?
Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.
6 / 10

The institute says its analysts are licensed, trained, certified in analytical work, and members of the International Association for Analytical Psychology.

Calibration notes

Comparative anchor: Jungian analysis US/Canada pass: regional accredited analyst organizations and low-fee/referral institutes are evaluated against professional standards, access, fee clarity, and platform-extraction risk rather than corporate scale alone.

Uncertainty
  • This pass relies mostly on official organization pages and directory records; later review should add regulator, client-contract, fee, labor, and complaint-record evidence where available.
Linked evidence
  • The institute says its analysts are licensed, trained, certified in analytical work, and members of the International Association for Analytical Psychology. [2]
Extraction
?
Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.
7 / 10

The Whitney Center is described as low-fee care for adults unable to afford private fees, and referral services are described as free and confidential.

Calibration notes

Comparative anchor: Jungian analysis US/Canada pass: regional accredited analyst organizations and low-fee/referral institutes are evaluated against professional standards, access, fee clarity, and platform-extraction risk rather than corporate scale alone.

Uncertainty
  • This pass relies mostly on official organization pages and directory records; later review should add regulator, client-contract, fee, labor, and complaint-record evidence where available.
Linked evidence
  • The Whitney Center is described as low-fee care for adults unable to afford private fees, and referral services are described as free and confidential. [3]
Labor Sovereignty
?
Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.
5 / 7

The institute relies on licensed analysts, candidates, training programs, and professional development rather than treating clinicians as anonymous lead-generation inventory.

Calibration notes

Comparative anchor: Jungian analysis US/Canada pass: regional accredited analyst organizations and low-fee/referral institutes are evaluated against professional standards, access, fee clarity, and platform-extraction risk rather than corporate scale alone.

Uncertainty
  • This pass relies mostly on official organization pages and directory records; later review should add regulator, client-contract, fee, labor, and complaint-record evidence where available.
Linked evidence
  • The institute relies on licensed analysts, candidates, training programs, and professional development rather than treating clinicians as anonymous lead-generation inventory. [4]
Solidarity with the Unemployed
?
Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.
6 / 7

The low-fee center specifically serves people unable to afford private fees and says its clientele includes students, artists, LGBTQ+ clients, and racially diverse Bay Area clients.

Calibration notes

Comparative anchor: Jungian analysis US/Canada pass: regional accredited analyst organizations and low-fee/referral institutes are evaluated against professional standards, access, fee clarity, and platform-extraction risk rather than corporate scale alone.

Uncertainty
  • This pass relies mostly on official organization pages and directory records; later review should add regulator, client-contract, fee, labor, and complaint-record evidence where available.
Linked evidence
  • The low-fee center specifically serves people unable to afford private fees and says its clientele includes students, artists, LGBTQ+ clients, and racially diverse Bay Area clients. [5]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity
?
Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.
6 / 7

The institute supports low-fee clinic access, a free referral service, a research library, and public programs, which points to mission costs beyond private-session revenue.

Calibration notes

Comparative anchor: Jungian analysis US/Canada pass: regional accredited analyst organizations and low-fee/referral institutes are evaluated against professional standards, access, fee clarity, and platform-extraction risk rather than corporate scale alone.

Uncertainty
  • This pass relies mostly on official organization pages and directory records; later review should add regulator, client-contract, fee, labor, and complaint-record evidence where available.
Linked evidence
  • The institute supports low-fee clinic access, a free referral service, a research library, and public programs, which points to mission costs beyond private-session revenue. [6]
Market Conduct
?
Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.
5 / 5

The service page discloses free referral access and a clinic contact path before a client enters private therapy matching.

Calibration notes

Comparative anchor: Jungian analysis US/Canada pass: regional accredited analyst organizations and low-fee/referral institutes are evaluated against professional standards, access, fee clarity, and platform-extraction risk rather than corporate scale alone.

Uncertainty
  • This pass relies mostly on official organization pages and directory records; later review should add regulator, client-contract, fee, labor, and complaint-record evidence where available.
Linked evidence
  • The service page discloses free referral access and a clinic contact path before a client enters private therapy matching. [7]
Product Integrity
?
Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.
5 / 5

The service mix keeps Jungian analysis connected to licensed analysts, candidates, library resources, a peer-reviewed journal, and continuing education.

Calibration notes

Comparative anchor: Jungian analysis US/Canada pass: regional accredited analyst organizations and low-fee/referral institutes are evaluated against professional standards, access, fee clarity, and platform-extraction risk rather than corporate scale alone.

Uncertainty
  • This pass relies mostly on official organization pages and directory records; later review should add regulator, client-contract, fee, labor, and complaint-record evidence where available.
Linked evidence
  • The service mix keeps Jungian analysis connected to licensed analysts, candidates, library resources, a peer-reviewed journal, and continuing education. [8]
Scale Integrity
?
Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.
5 / 5

The organization remains regional and institution-centered, so expansion appears tied to training, referral, clinic, and education capacity rather than national therapy-platform scale.

Calibration notes

Comparative anchor: Jungian analysis US/Canada pass: regional accredited analyst organizations and low-fee/referral institutes are evaluated against professional standards, access, fee clarity, and platform-extraction risk rather than corporate scale alone.

Uncertainty
  • This pass relies mostly on official organization pages and directory records; later review should add regulator, client-contract, fee, labor, and complaint-record evidence where available.
Linked evidence
  • The organization remains regional and institution-centered, so expansion appears tied to training, referral, clinic, and education capacity rather than national therapy-platform scale. [9]

Penalties

No penalties applied in this version.

Bonus Credits

Bonus Credit Why this credit
Openness to Dissent
?
Credit for tolerating internal, user, customer, worker, and public dissent without retaliation, capture, or viewpoint laundering.
1 / 3

The public record for C.G.

Calibration notes

Comparative anchor: Jungian analysis US/Canada pass: regional accredited analyst organizations and low-fee/referral institutes are evaluated against professional standards, access, fee clarity, and platform-extraction risk rather than corporate scale alone.

Uncertainty
  • This pass relies mostly on official organization pages and directory records; later review should add regulator, client-contract, fee, labor, and complaint-record evidence where available.
Linked evidence
  • C.G. Jung Institute of San Francisco publishes public education, referral, or professional-society information that lets clients and clinicians inspect the field rather than relying only on private word-of-mouth. [10]
Good Deal
?
Credit for unusually fair value: durable quality, fair pricing, low lock-in, and clear customer surplus.
2 / 3

The public record for C.G.

Calibration notes

Comparative anchor: Jungian analysis US/Canada pass: regional accredited analyst organizations and low-fee/referral institutes are evaluated against professional standards, access, fee clarity, and platform-extraction risk rather than corporate scale alone.

Uncertainty
  • This pass relies mostly on official organization pages and directory records; later review should add regulator, client-contract, fee, labor, and complaint-record evidence where available.
Linked evidence
  • C.G. Jung Institute of San Francisco offers a low-fee or affordable therapy route in a field where private Jungian analysis is often difficult and expensive to access. [11]
Cost Transparency
?
Credit for clear posted prices, all-in fees, unit costs, public rate cards, margin/cost visibility, or surplus-allocation transparency, especially in markets where opaque quotes, hidden fees, or individualized pricing are normal.
1 / 3

The public record for C.G.

Calibration notes

Comparative anchor: Jungian analysis US/Canada pass: regional accredited analyst organizations and low-fee/referral institutes are evaluated against professional standards, access, fee clarity, and platform-extraction risk rather than corporate scale alone.

Uncertainty
  • This pass relies mostly on official organization pages and directory records; later review should add regulator, client-contract, fee, labor, and complaint-record evidence where available.
Linked evidence
  • C.G. Jung Institute of San Francisco publishes practical intake and fee-setting information for its affordable or referral service, giving clients more price visibility than ordinary private-practice search. [12]

Confidence Basis

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

Medium 76/100

12 verified linked claims 12 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 12/12 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 13/20

12 verified linked claims

Source quality 10/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 14/18

12 direct claims across 12 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 16, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 10/10

12/12 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending
VerificationUnverified
ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.
Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.
1The institute presents itself as a regional institute with member analysts, a clinic, library, journal, public programs, and donation-supported institute infrastructure rather than private-equity ownership.

Ownership Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

2The institute says its analysts are licensed, trained, certified in analytical work, and members of the International Association for Analytical Psychology.

Governance Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

3The Whitney Center is described as low-fee care for adults unable to afford private fees, and referral services are described as free and confidential.

Extraction Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

4The institute relies on licensed analysts, candidates, training programs, and professional development rather than treating clinicians as anonymous lead-generation inventory.

Labor Sovereignty Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

5The low-fee center specifically serves people unable to afford private fees and says its clientele includes students, artists, LGBTQ+ clients, and racially diverse Bay Area clients.

Solidarity Unemployed Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

6The institute supports low-fee clinic access, a free referral service, a research library, and public programs, which points to mission costs beyond private-session revenue.

Loss Bearing Fidelity Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

7The service page discloses free referral access and a clinic contact path before a client enters private therapy matching.

Market Conduct Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

8The service mix keeps Jungian analysis connected to licensed analysts, candidates, library resources, a peer-reviewed journal, and continuing education.

Product Integrity Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

9The organization remains regional and institution-centered, so expansion appears tied to training, referral, clinic, and education capacity rather than national therapy-platform scale.

Scale Integrity Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

10C.G. Jung Institute of San Francisco publishes public education, referral, or professional-society information that lets clients and clinicians inspect the field rather than relying only on private word-of-mouth.

Openness To Dissent Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

11C.G. Jung Institute of San Francisco offers a low-fee or affordable therapy route in a field where private Jungian analysis is often difficult and expensive to access.

Good Deal Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

12C.G. Jung Institute of San Francisco publishes practical intake and fee-setting information for its affordable or referral service, giving clients more price visibility than ordinary private-practice search.

Cost Transparency Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

Alternatives

Competitors

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for C.G. Jung Institute of San Francisco Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.

View Full Audit Log