free text-based mental-health crisis support nonprofit

Crisis Text Line

A nonprofit crisis line offering free 24/7 text-based mental-health support. Crisis Text Line remains useful because text support is unusually accessible, but it is capped for crisis-line active-rescue risk because its FAQ says supervisors may contact emergency services for texters assessed as unable to plan for safety, and its past data-governance controversy already creates surveillance sensitivity.

Why this matters: Text-based help matters because many people cannot safely or practically make a voice call during a crisis, but the service is not a no-emergency-services support channel.

Letter grade C Performative Medium confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1 Last reviewed May 13, 2026

Final Score 39* C - Performative

CPERFORMATIVE39 pts

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material47

Bonus+7

Cap49Crisis-line active-rescue cap: nonconsensual emergency-services, law-enforcement, or involuntary psychiatric escalation risk keeps crisis hotlines below A unless consent-based safeguards are documented

After Cap49

Penalties-10

!Not Verified

Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Evaluation Overview

C - Performative

The score turns mainly on Extraction, with the largest penalty coming from Surveillance Capture.

Strengths

Extraction8/10
Solidarity with the Unemployed7/7
Loss-Bearing Fidelity6/7

Penalties

Surveillance Capture-4
Coercive Violence-3
Accountability Opacity-2
Ideological Disavowal-1

Evidence state

ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Linked claims17
Direct axis claims17
Coverage17/17

Scoring Axes

Axis	Score	Why this score
Ownership ? Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.	5 / 10	Crisis Text Line's public record identifies whether the resource is nonprofit, federal, peer-run, culturally specific, or otherwise structured outside ordinary commercial lead generation. Crisis Text Line's public record identifies whether the resource is nonprofit, federal, peer-run, culturally specific, or otherwise structured outside ordinary commercial lead generation. On Ownership, Crisis Text Line belongs in the positive middle because it provides real public utility and reduces a practical power imbalance. It remains below the strongest entries where federal bureaucracy, partner variation, limited hours, data sensitivity, or less direct governance weakens user control. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Public resources expansion calibrated across helplines, legal-aid portals, federal benefit and disaster systems, treatment locators, digital inclusion nonprofits, and direct aid navigation resources. Linked evidence Crisis Text Line's public record identifies whether the resource is nonprofit, federal, peer-run, culturally specific, or otherwise structured outside ordinary commercial lead generation. [1] context Crisis Text Line's public materials show the decision structure and accountability context behind the public-facing help resource. [2] context Crisis Text Line's reviewed model determines whether help is delivered as free public infrastructure, nonprofit service, federal portal, paid referral, or commercial capture of vulnerable users. [3] context Crisis Text Line's public record shows whether advocates, volunteers, peers, or staff provide help through a mission-oriented service rather than a purely extractive labor model. [4] context Crisis Text Line's resource helps people with crisis, abuse, legal, treatment, benefits, food, disaster, digital access, health-cost, or other practical needs that often fall outside normal paid consumer markets. [5] context Crisis Text Line's service absorbs navigation, search, information, referral, advocacy, emotional-support, or application burdens that would otherwise be pushed onto people in distress. [6] context Crisis Text Line operates in an area where commercial substitutes often monetize desperation, confusion, lead generation, recurring fees, or informational asymmetry. [7] context Crisis Text Line's core usefulness depends on accessible information, trained support, current referrals, confidentiality, eligibility clarity, and avoiding exploitative handoffs. [8] context Crisis Text Line's scale affects whether the resource remains accessible, noncommercial, culturally competent, and accountable as public need increases. [9]
Governance ? Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.	5 / 10	Crisis Text Line's linked public materials show the decision structure and accountability context behind the public-facing help resource. Crisis Text Line's linked public materials show the decision structure and accountability context behind the public-facing help resource. On Governance, Crisis Text Line belongs in the positive middle because it provides real public utility and reduces a practical power imbalance. It remains below the strongest entries where federal bureaucracy, partner variation, limited hours, data sensitivity, or less direct governance weakens user control. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Public resources expansion calibrated across helplines, legal-aid portals, federal benefit and disaster systems, treatment locators, digital inclusion nonprofits, and direct aid navigation resources. Linked evidence context Crisis Text Line's public record identifies whether the resource is nonprofit, federal, peer-run, culturally specific, or otherwise structured outside ordinary commercial lead generation. [1] Crisis Text Line's public materials show the decision structure and accountability context behind the public-facing help resource. [2] context Crisis Text Line's reviewed model determines whether help is delivered as free public infrastructure, nonprofit service, federal portal, paid referral, or commercial capture of vulnerable users. [3] context Crisis Text Line's public record shows whether advocates, volunteers, peers, or staff provide help through a mission-oriented service rather than a purely extractive labor model. [4] context Crisis Text Line's resource helps people with crisis, abuse, legal, treatment, benefits, food, disaster, digital access, health-cost, or other practical needs that often fall outside normal paid consumer markets. [5] context Crisis Text Line's service absorbs navigation, search, information, referral, advocacy, emotional-support, or application burdens that would otherwise be pushed onto people in distress. [6] context Crisis Text Line operates in an area where commercial substitutes often monetize desperation, confusion, lead generation, recurring fees, or informational asymmetry. [7] context Crisis Text Line's core usefulness depends on accessible information, trained support, current referrals, confidentiality, eligibility clarity, and avoiding exploitative handoffs. [8] context Crisis Text Line's scale affects whether the resource remains accessible, noncommercial, culturally competent, and accountable as public need increases. [9]
Extraction ? Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.	8 / 10	Crisis Text Line's reviewed model determines whether help is delivered as free public infrastructure, nonprofit service, federal portal, paid referral, or commercial capture of vulnerable users. Crisis Text Line's reviewed model determines whether help is delivered as free public infrastructure, nonprofit service, federal portal, paid referral, or commercial capture of vulnerable users. On Extraction, Crisis Text Line sits near the top of this resource category because the public-facing service directly reduces dependency, crisis exposure, legal confusion, medical bureaucracy, or access barriers without turning the user into a monetized lead. The value stops short of perfect where the resource depends on outside funding, partners, or uneven local implementation. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Public resources expansion calibrated across helplines, legal-aid portals, federal benefit and disaster systems, treatment locators, digital inclusion nonprofits, and direct aid navigation resources. Linked evidence context Crisis Text Line's public record identifies whether the resource is nonprofit, federal, peer-run, culturally specific, or otherwise structured outside ordinary commercial lead generation. [1] context Crisis Text Line's public materials show the decision structure and accountability context behind the public-facing help resource. [2] Crisis Text Line's reviewed model determines whether help is delivered as free public infrastructure, nonprofit service, federal portal, paid referral, or commercial capture of vulnerable users. [3] context Crisis Text Line's public record shows whether advocates, volunteers, peers, or staff provide help through a mission-oriented service rather than a purely extractive labor model. [4] context Crisis Text Line's resource helps people with crisis, abuse, legal, treatment, benefits, food, disaster, digital access, health-cost, or other practical needs that often fall outside normal paid consumer markets. [5] context Crisis Text Line's service absorbs navigation, search, information, referral, advocacy, emotional-support, or application burdens that would otherwise be pushed onto people in distress. [6] context Crisis Text Line operates in an area where commercial substitutes often monetize desperation, confusion, lead generation, recurring fees, or informational asymmetry. [7] context Crisis Text Line's core usefulness depends on accessible information, trained support, current referrals, confidentiality, eligibility clarity, and avoiding exploitative handoffs. [8] context Crisis Text Line's scale affects whether the resource remains accessible, noncommercial, culturally competent, and accountable as public need increases. [9]
Labor Sovereignty ? Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.	4 / 7	Crisis Text Line's public record gives limited direct evidence about whether advocates, volunteers, peers, or staff provide help through a mission-oriented service rather than a purely extractive labor model. Crisis Text Line's public record gives limited direct evidence about whether advocates, volunteers, peers, or staff provide help through a mission-oriented service rather than a purely extractive labor model. On Labor Sovereignty, Crisis Text Line belongs in the positive middle because it provides real public utility and reduces a practical power imbalance. It remains below the strongest entries where federal bureaucracy, partner variation, limited hours, data sensitivity, or less direct governance weakens user control. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Public resources expansion calibrated across helplines, legal-aid portals, federal benefit and disaster systems, treatment locators, digital inclusion nonprofits, and direct aid navigation resources. Linked evidence context Crisis Text Line's public record identifies whether the resource is nonprofit, federal, peer-run, culturally specific, or otherwise structured outside ordinary commercial lead generation. [1] context Crisis Text Line's public materials show the decision structure and accountability context behind the public-facing help resource. [2] context Crisis Text Line's reviewed model determines whether help is delivered as free public infrastructure, nonprofit service, federal portal, paid referral, or commercial capture of vulnerable users. [3] Crisis Text Line's public record shows whether advocates, volunteers, peers, or staff provide help through a mission-oriented service rather than a purely extractive labor model. [4] context Crisis Text Line's resource helps people with crisis, abuse, legal, treatment, benefits, food, disaster, digital access, health-cost, or other practical needs that often fall outside normal paid consumer markets. [5] context Crisis Text Line's service absorbs navigation, search, information, referral, advocacy, emotional-support, or application burdens that would otherwise be pushed onto people in distress. [6] context Crisis Text Line operates in an area where commercial substitutes often monetize desperation, confusion, lead generation, recurring fees, or informational asymmetry. [7] context Crisis Text Line's core usefulness depends on accessible information, trained support, current referrals, confidentiality, eligibility clarity, and avoiding exploitative handoffs. [8] context Crisis Text Line's scale affects whether the resource remains accessible, noncommercial, culturally competent, and accountable as public need increases. [9]
Solidarity with the Unemployed ? Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.	7 / 7	Crisis Text Line's resource helps people with crisis, abuse, legal, treatment, benefits, food, disaster, digital access, health-cost, or other practical needs that often fall outside normal paid consumer markets. Crisis Text Line's resource helps people with crisis, abuse, legal, treatment, benefits, food, disaster, digital access, health-cost, or other practical needs that often fall outside normal paid consumer markets. On Solidarity with the Unemployed, Crisis Text Line sits near the top of this resource category because the public-facing service directly reduces dependency, crisis exposure, legal confusion, medical bureaucracy, or access barriers without turning the user into a monetized lead. The value stops short of perfect where the resource depends on outside funding, partners, or uneven local implementation. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Public resources expansion calibrated across helplines, legal-aid portals, federal benefit and disaster systems, treatment locators, digital inclusion nonprofits, and direct aid navigation resources. Linked evidence context Crisis Text Line's public record identifies whether the resource is nonprofit, federal, peer-run, culturally specific, or otherwise structured outside ordinary commercial lead generation. [1] context Crisis Text Line's public materials show the decision structure and accountability context behind the public-facing help resource. [2] context Crisis Text Line's reviewed model determines whether help is delivered as free public infrastructure, nonprofit service, federal portal, paid referral, or commercial capture of vulnerable users. [3] context Crisis Text Line's public record shows whether advocates, volunteers, peers, or staff provide help through a mission-oriented service rather than a purely extractive labor model. [4] Crisis Text Line's resource helps people with crisis, abuse, legal, treatment, benefits, food, disaster, digital access, health-cost, or other practical needs that often fall outside normal paid consumer markets. [5] context Crisis Text Line's service absorbs navigation, search, information, referral, advocacy, emotional-support, or application burdens that would otherwise be pushed onto people in distress. [6] context Crisis Text Line operates in an area where commercial substitutes often monetize desperation, confusion, lead generation, recurring fees, or informational asymmetry. [7] context Crisis Text Line's core usefulness depends on accessible information, trained support, current referrals, confidentiality, eligibility clarity, and avoiding exploitative handoffs. [8] context Crisis Text Line's scale affects whether the resource remains accessible, noncommercial, culturally competent, and accountable as public need increases. [9]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity ? Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.	6 / 7	Crisis Text Line's service absorbs navigation, search, information, referral, advocacy, emotional-support, or application burdens that would otherwise be pushed onto people in distress. Crisis Text Line's service absorbs navigation, search, information, referral, advocacy, emotional-support, or application burdens that would otherwise be pushed onto people in distress. On Loss-Bearing Fidelity, Crisis Text Line belongs in the positive middle because it provides real public utility and reduces a practical power imbalance. It remains below the strongest entries where federal bureaucracy, partner variation, limited hours, data sensitivity, or less direct governance weakens user control. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Public resources expansion calibrated across helplines, legal-aid portals, federal benefit and disaster systems, treatment locators, digital inclusion nonprofits, and direct aid navigation resources. Linked evidence context Crisis Text Line's public record identifies whether the resource is nonprofit, federal, peer-run, culturally specific, or otherwise structured outside ordinary commercial lead generation. [1] context Crisis Text Line's public materials show the decision structure and accountability context behind the public-facing help resource. [2] context Crisis Text Line's reviewed model determines whether help is delivered as free public infrastructure, nonprofit service, federal portal, paid referral, or commercial capture of vulnerable users. [3] context Crisis Text Line's public record shows whether advocates, volunteers, peers, or staff provide help through a mission-oriented service rather than a purely extractive labor model. [4] context Crisis Text Line's resource helps people with crisis, abuse, legal, treatment, benefits, food, disaster, digital access, health-cost, or other practical needs that often fall outside normal paid consumer markets. [5] Crisis Text Line's service absorbs navigation, search, information, referral, advocacy, emotional-support, or application burdens that would otherwise be pushed onto people in distress. [6] context Crisis Text Line operates in an area where commercial substitutes often monetize desperation, confusion, lead generation, recurring fees, or informational asymmetry. [7] context Crisis Text Line's core usefulness depends on accessible information, trained support, current referrals, confidentiality, eligibility clarity, and avoiding exploitative handoffs. [8] context Crisis Text Line's scale affects whether the resource remains accessible, noncommercial, culturally competent, and accountable as public need increases. [9]
Market Conduct ? Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.	4 / 5	Crisis Text Line operates in an area where commercial substitutes often monetize desperation, confusion, lead generation, recurring fees, or informational asymmetry. Crisis Text Line operates in an area where commercial substitutes often monetize desperation, confusion, lead generation, recurring fees, or informational asymmetry. On Market Conduct, Crisis Text Line belongs in the positive middle because it provides real public utility and reduces a practical power imbalance. It remains below the strongest entries where federal bureaucracy, partner variation, limited hours, data sensitivity, or less direct governance weakens user control. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Public resources expansion calibrated across helplines, legal-aid portals, federal benefit and disaster systems, treatment locators, digital inclusion nonprofits, and direct aid navigation resources. Linked evidence context Crisis Text Line's public record identifies whether the resource is nonprofit, federal, peer-run, culturally specific, or otherwise structured outside ordinary commercial lead generation. [1] context Crisis Text Line's public materials show the decision structure and accountability context behind the public-facing help resource. [2] context Crisis Text Line's reviewed model determines whether help is delivered as free public infrastructure, nonprofit service, federal portal, paid referral, or commercial capture of vulnerable users. [3] context Crisis Text Line's public record shows whether advocates, volunteers, peers, or staff provide help through a mission-oriented service rather than a purely extractive labor model. [4] context Crisis Text Line's resource helps people with crisis, abuse, legal, treatment, benefits, food, disaster, digital access, health-cost, or other practical needs that often fall outside normal paid consumer markets. [5] context Crisis Text Line's service absorbs navigation, search, information, referral, advocacy, emotional-support, or application burdens that would otherwise be pushed onto people in distress. [6] Crisis Text Line operates in an area where commercial substitutes often monetize desperation, confusion, lead generation, recurring fees, or informational asymmetry. [7] context Crisis Text Line's core usefulness depends on accessible information, trained support, current referrals, confidentiality, eligibility clarity, and avoiding exploitative handoffs. [8] context Crisis Text Line's scale affects whether the resource remains accessible, noncommercial, culturally competent, and accountable as public need increases. [9]
Product Integrity ? Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.	4 / 5	Crisis Text Line's core usefulness depends on accessible information, trained support, current referrals, confidentiality, eligibility clarity, and avoiding exploitative handoffs. Crisis Text Line's core usefulness depends on accessible information, trained support, current referrals, confidentiality, eligibility clarity, and avoiding exploitative handoffs. On Product Integrity, Crisis Text Line belongs in the positive middle because it provides real public utility and reduces a practical power imbalance. It remains below the strongest entries where federal bureaucracy, partner variation, limited hours, data sensitivity, or less direct governance weakens user control. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Public resources expansion calibrated across helplines, legal-aid portals, federal benefit and disaster systems, treatment locators, digital inclusion nonprofits, and direct aid navigation resources. Linked evidence context Crisis Text Line's public record identifies whether the resource is nonprofit, federal, peer-run, culturally specific, or otherwise structured outside ordinary commercial lead generation. [1] context Crisis Text Line's public materials show the decision structure and accountability context behind the public-facing help resource. [2] context Crisis Text Line's reviewed model determines whether help is delivered as free public infrastructure, nonprofit service, federal portal, paid referral, or commercial capture of vulnerable users. [3] context Crisis Text Line's public record shows whether advocates, volunteers, peers, or staff provide help through a mission-oriented service rather than a purely extractive labor model. [4] context Crisis Text Line's resource helps people with crisis, abuse, legal, treatment, benefits, food, disaster, digital access, health-cost, or other practical needs that often fall outside normal paid consumer markets. [5] context Crisis Text Line's service absorbs navigation, search, information, referral, advocacy, emotional-support, or application burdens that would otherwise be pushed onto people in distress. [6] context Crisis Text Line operates in an area where commercial substitutes often monetize desperation, confusion, lead generation, recurring fees, or informational asymmetry. [7] Crisis Text Line's core usefulness depends on accessible information, trained support, current referrals, confidentiality, eligibility clarity, and avoiding exploitative handoffs. [8] context Crisis Text Line's scale affects whether the resource remains accessible, noncommercial, culturally competent, and accountable as public need increases. [9]
Scale Integrity ? Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.	4 / 5	Crisis Text Line's scale affects whether the resource remains accessible, noncommercial, culturally competent, and accountable as public need increases. Crisis Text Line's scale affects whether the resource remains accessible, noncommercial, culturally competent, and accountable as public need increases. On Scale Integrity, Crisis Text Line belongs in the positive middle because it provides real public utility and reduces a practical power imbalance. It remains below the strongest entries where federal bureaucracy, partner variation, limited hours, data sensitivity, or less direct governance weakens user control. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Public resources expansion calibrated across helplines, legal-aid portals, federal benefit and disaster systems, treatment locators, digital inclusion nonprofits, and direct aid navigation resources. Linked evidence context Crisis Text Line's public record identifies whether the resource is nonprofit, federal, peer-run, culturally specific, or otherwise structured outside ordinary commercial lead generation. [1] context Crisis Text Line's public materials show the decision structure and accountability context behind the public-facing help resource. [2] context Crisis Text Line's reviewed model determines whether help is delivered as free public infrastructure, nonprofit service, federal portal, paid referral, or commercial capture of vulnerable users. [3] context Crisis Text Line's public record shows whether advocates, volunteers, peers, or staff provide help through a mission-oriented service rather than a purely extractive labor model. [4] context Crisis Text Line's resource helps people with crisis, abuse, legal, treatment, benefits, food, disaster, digital access, health-cost, or other practical needs that often fall outside normal paid consumer markets. [5] context Crisis Text Line's service absorbs navigation, search, information, referral, advocacy, emotional-support, or application burdens that would otherwise be pushed onto people in distress. [6] context Crisis Text Line operates in an area where commercial substitutes often monetize desperation, confusion, lead generation, recurring fees, or informational asymmetry. [7] context Crisis Text Line's core usefulness depends on accessible information, trained support, current referrals, confidentiality, eligibility clarity, and avoiding exploitative handoffs. [8] Crisis Text Line's scale affects whether the resource remains accessible, noncommercial, culturally competent, and accountable as public need increases. [9]

Penalties

Penalty	Applied	Why this penalty
Coercive Violence ? Direct or institutionally enabled killing, torture, detention abuse, armed repression, forced displacement, violent domination, or nonconsensual crisis-line emergency escalation that exposes callers to confinement or force. Range: -30 to 0.	-3	Crisis Text Line warrants a Coercive Violence penalty because its FAQ permits supervisor contact with emergency services, who may dispatch a wellness check, when a texter is assessed as in immediate danger and unable to plan for safety. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Crisis-line active-rescue calibration: lines that reserve nonconsensual police, 911, emergency-service, or involuntary psychiatric escalation cannot score like consent-based peer support; deceptive or frequent escalation should be capped more severely. Linked evidence Crisis Text Line says supervisors may contact emergency services, who may dispatch a wellness check, when a texter is assessed as in immediate danger and unable to plan for safety. [14]
Accountability Opacity ? Material opacity, reputation laundering, or hidden accountability structures that prevent public accountability. Range: -2 to 0.	-2	Crisis Text Line's public record makes Accountability Opacity relevant through its crisis practices, privacy posture, public-service claims, free access, legal-rights work, or referral architecture. Crisis Text Line's public record makes Accountability Opacity relevant through its crisis practices, privacy posture, public-service claims, free access, legal-rights work, or referral architecture. This creates a Accountability Opacity penalty because the resource touches sensitive personal need, crisis information, government eligibility, or emergency response, where privacy, coercion, disclosure, and institutional framing matter. The penalty is limited where the evidence shows managed risk rather than a business model built around exploitation. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Public resources expansion calibrated across helplines, legal-aid portals, federal benefit and disaster systems, treatment locators, digital inclusion nonprofits, and direct aid navigation resources. Linked evidence Crisis Text Line's public record makes Accountability Opacity relevant through its crisis practices, privacy posture, public-service claims, free access, legal-rights work, or referral architecture. [15]
Surveillance Capture ? Invasive surveillance, unreasonably non-optional tracking, facial recognition, biometric identification, or AI behavior scanning of customers, workers, bystanders, or the public. Range: -5 to 0.	-4	Crisis Text Line's public record makes Surveillance Capture relevant through its crisis practices, privacy posture, public-service claims, free access, legal-rights work, or referral architecture. Crisis Text Line's public record makes Surveillance Capture relevant through its crisis practices, privacy posture, public-service claims, free access, legal-rights work, or referral architecture. This creates a Surveillance Capture penalty because the resource touches sensitive personal need, crisis information, government eligibility, or emergency response, where privacy, coercion, disclosure, and institutional framing matter. The penalty is limited where the evidence shows managed risk rather than a business model built around exploitation. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Public resources expansion calibrated across helplines, legal-aid portals, federal benefit and disaster systems, treatment locators, digital inclusion nonprofits, and direct aid navigation resources. Linked evidence Crisis Text Line's public record makes Surveillance Capture relevant through its crisis practices, privacy posture, public-service claims, free access, legal-rights work, or referral architecture. [16]
Ideological Disavowal ? Concealed ideology presented as neutrality, expertise, professional necessity, public-service administration, market inevitability, or non-ideological common sense while exercising power. Range: -3 to 0.	-1	Crisis Text Line's public record makes Ideological Disavowal relevant through its crisis practices, privacy posture, public-service claims, free access, legal-rights work, or referral architecture. Crisis Text Line's public record makes Ideological Disavowal relevant through its crisis practices, privacy posture, public-service claims, free access, legal-rights work, or referral architecture. This creates a Ideological Disavowal penalty because the resource touches sensitive personal need, crisis information, government eligibility, or emergency response, where privacy, coercion, disclosure, and institutional framing matter. The penalty is limited where the evidence shows managed risk rather than a business model built around exploitation. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Public resources expansion calibrated across helplines, legal-aid portals, federal benefit and disaster systems, treatment locators, digital inclusion nonprofits, and direct aid navigation resources. Linked evidence Crisis Text Line's public record makes Ideological Disavowal relevant through its crisis practices, privacy posture, public-service claims, free access, legal-rights work, or referral architecture. [17]

Bonus Credits

Bonus	Credit	Why this credit
Openness to Dissent ? Credit for tolerating internal, user, customer, worker, and public dissent without retaliation, capture, or viewpoint laundering.	1 / 3	Crisis Text Line's public record makes Openness to Dissent relevant through its crisis practices, privacy posture, public-service claims, free access, legal-rights work, or referral architecture. Crisis Text Line's public record makes Openness to Dissent relevant through its crisis practices, privacy posture, public-service claims, free access, legal-rights work, or referral architecture. This adds Openness to Dissent credit because the resource gives people unusually clear, free, rights-respecting, or dependency-reducing help in a domain where paid markets and bureaucracies often fail. The credit is limited where the practice is not fully peer-run, not universally available, or still depends on outside systems. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Public resources expansion calibrated across helplines, legal-aid portals, federal benefit and disaster systems, treatment locators, digital inclusion nonprofits, and direct aid navigation resources. Linked evidence Crisis Text Line's public record makes Openness to Dissent relevant through its crisis practices, privacy posture, public-service claims, free access, legal-rights work, or referral architecture. [10]
Constitutional Spirit ? Credit for respecting constitutional rights and civil-liberties norms even where private law does not strictly require it.	1 / 3	Crisis Text Line's public record makes Constitutional Spirit relevant through its crisis practices, privacy posture, public-service claims, free access, legal-rights work, or referral architecture. Crisis Text Line's public record makes Constitutional Spirit relevant through its crisis practices, privacy posture, public-service claims, free access, legal-rights work, or referral architecture. This adds Constitutional Spirit credit because the resource gives people unusually clear, free, rights-respecting, or dependency-reducing help in a domain where paid markets and bureaucracies often fail. The credit is limited where the practice is not fully peer-run, not universally available, or still depends on outside systems. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Public resources expansion calibrated across helplines, legal-aid portals, federal benefit and disaster systems, treatment locators, digital inclusion nonprofits, and direct aid navigation resources. Linked evidence Crisis Text Line's public record makes Constitutional Spirit relevant through its crisis practices, privacy posture, public-service claims, free access, legal-rights work, or referral architecture. [11]
Good Deal ? Credit for unusually fair value: durable quality, fair pricing, low lock-in, and clear customer surplus.	3 / 3	Crisis Text Line's public record makes Good Deal relevant through its crisis practices, privacy posture, public-service claims, free access, legal-rights work, or referral architecture. Crisis Text Line's public record makes Good Deal relevant through its crisis practices, privacy posture, public-service claims, free access, legal-rights work, or referral architecture. This adds Good Deal credit because the resource gives people unusually clear, free, rights-respecting, or dependency-reducing help in a domain where paid markets and bureaucracies often fail. The credit is limited where the practice is not fully peer-run, not universally available, or still depends on outside systems. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Public resources expansion calibrated across helplines, legal-aid portals, federal benefit and disaster systems, treatment locators, digital inclusion nonprofits, and direct aid navigation resources. Linked evidence Crisis Text Line's public record makes Good Deal relevant through its crisis practices, privacy posture, public-service claims, free access, legal-rights work, or referral architecture. [12]
Cost Transparency ? Credit for clear posted prices, all-in fees, unit costs, public rate cards, margin/cost visibility, or surplus-allocation transparency, especially in markets where opaque quotes, hidden fees, or individualized pricing are normal.	2 / 3	Crisis Text Line's public record makes Cost Transparency relevant through its crisis practices, privacy posture, public-service claims, free access, legal-rights work, or referral architecture. Crisis Text Line's public record makes Cost Transparency relevant through its crisis practices, privacy posture, public-service claims, free access, legal-rights work, or referral architecture. This adds Cost Transparency credit because the resource gives people unusually clear, free, rights-respecting, or dependency-reducing help in a domain where paid markets and bureaucracies often fail. The credit is limited where the practice is not fully peer-run, not universally available, or still depends on outside systems. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Public resources expansion calibrated across helplines, legal-aid portals, federal benefit and disaster systems, treatment locators, digital inclusion nonprofits, and direct aid navigation resources. Linked evidence Crisis Text Line's public record makes Cost Transparency relevant through its crisis practices, privacy posture, public-service claims, free access, legal-rights work, or referral architecture. [13]

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

Medium 79/100

17 verified linked claims 17 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 17/17 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 16/20

17 verified linked claims

Source quality 10/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 14/18

17 direct claims across 17 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 15, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 10/10

17/17 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending

VerificationUnverified

ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)

ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)

Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.

Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

1Crisis Text Line's public record identifies whether the resource is nonprofit, federal, peer-run, culturally specific, or otherwise structured outside ordinary commercial lead generation.

Ownership Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Crisis Text LineGeneral web source · 58%

2Crisis Text Line's public materials show the decision structure and accountability context behind the public-facing help resource.

Governance Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Crisis Text LineGeneral web source · 58%

3Crisis Text Line's reviewed model determines whether help is delivered as free public infrastructure, nonprofit service, federal portal, paid referral, or commercial capture of vulnerable users.

Extraction Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Crisis Text LineGeneral web source · 58%

4Crisis Text Line's public record shows whether advocates, volunteers, peers, or staff provide help through a mission-oriented service rather than a purely extractive labor model.

Labor Sovereignty Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Crisis Text Line corporate one-pagerGeneral web source · 58%

5Crisis Text Line's resource helps people with crisis, abuse, legal, treatment, benefits, food, disaster, digital access, health-cost, or other practical needs that often fall outside normal paid consumer markets.

Solidarity Unemployed Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Crisis Text Line corporate one-pagerGeneral web source · 58%

6Crisis Text Line's service absorbs navigation, search, information, referral, advocacy, emotional-support, or application burdens that would otherwise be pushed onto people in distress.

Loss Bearing Fidelity Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Crisis Text Line corporate one-pagerGeneral web source · 58%

7Crisis Text Line operates in an area where commercial substitutes often monetize desperation, confusion, lead generation, recurring fees, or informational asymmetry.

Market Conduct Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Crisis Text Line corporate one-pagerGeneral web source · 58%

8Crisis Text Line's core usefulness depends on accessible information, trained support, current referrals, confidentiality, eligibility clarity, and avoiding exploitative handoffs.

Product Integrity Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Crisis Text LineGeneral web source · 58%

9Crisis Text Line's scale affects whether the resource remains accessible, noncommercial, culturally competent, and accountable as public need increases.

Scale Integrity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Crisis Text Line corporate one-pagerGeneral web source · 58%

10Crisis Text Line's public record makes Openness to Dissent relevant through its crisis practices, privacy posture, public-service claims, free access, legal-rights work, or referral architecture.

Openness To Dissent Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Crisis Text Line corporate one-pagerGeneral web source · 58%

11Crisis Text Line's public record makes Constitutional Spirit relevant through its crisis practices, privacy posture, public-service claims, free access, legal-rights work, or referral architecture.

Constitutional Spirit Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Crisis Text Line corporate one-pagerGeneral web source · 58%

12Crisis Text Line's public record makes Good Deal relevant through its crisis practices, privacy posture, public-service claims, free access, legal-rights work, or referral architecture.

Good Deal Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Crisis Text Line corporate one-pagerGeneral web source · 58%

13Crisis Text Line's public record makes Cost Transparency relevant through its crisis practices, privacy posture, public-service claims, free access, legal-rights work, or referral architecture.

Cost Transparency Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Crisis Text Line corporate one-pagerGeneral web source · 58%

14Crisis Text Line says supervisors may contact emergency services, who may dispatch a wellness check, when a texter is assessed as in immediate danger and unable to plan for safety.

Coercive Violence Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 15, 2026

AI scaffold

Crisis Text Line FAQGeneral web source · 58%

15Crisis Text Line's public record makes Accountability Opacity relevant through its crisis practices, privacy posture, public-service claims, free access, legal-rights work, or referral architecture.

Accountability Opacity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Crisis Text Line corporate one-pagerGeneral web source · 58%

16Crisis Text Line's public record makes Surveillance Capture relevant through its crisis practices, privacy posture, public-service claims, free access, legal-rights work, or referral architecture.

Surveillance Capture Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Crisis Text Line corporate one-pagerGeneral web source · 58%

17Crisis Text Line's public record makes Ideological Disavowal relevant through its crisis practices, privacy posture, public-service claims, free access, legal-rights work, or referral architecture.

Ideological Disavowal Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Crisis Text Line corporate one-pagerGeneral web source · 58%

Alternatives

Competitors

AGOOD66 People USA Rose Houses peer respite network · same market AGOOD66 Promise Resource Network Retreat peer-run respite · same market AGOOD66 Wildflower Alliance Afiya Peer Respite peer-run respite · same market AGOOD63 Trans Lifeline trans peer-support hotline · same market AGOOD61 CSPNJ Wellness Respite Services peer-operated respite network · same market AGOOD61 Georgia Peer Support and Wellness Respite Centers peer respite network · same market AGOOD61 Juniper Peer-Run Respite peer-run respite · same market AGOOD61 Karaya Peer Respite peer-run respite · same market

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for Crisis Text Line Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.

View Full Audit Log