public company

CVS Health

Industry Health

A public health conglomerate combining retail pharmacy, CVS Caremark pharmacy-benefit management, Aetna insurance, clinics, and health-data operations. CVS is a central pharmacy competitor, but its opioid litigation, PBM conflicts, and sensitive-data scale make it a strongly penalized health-market actor.

Why this matters: Pharmacy choices are ordinary consumer choices with unusually high stakes because health data, drug access, and addictive products converge there.

Letter grade F Malignant Medium confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1 Last reviewed May 11, 2026

Final Score -18* F - Malignant

FMALIGNANT-18 pts

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material10

Bonus+0

Cap35Ownership <= 2 and Governance <= 2

After Cap10

Penalties-28

Private Government badge

CVS Health receives the Private Government badge because it combines large-scale private rule-setting over customers, workers, users, members, or counterparties with OpenLobby-documented lobbying of about $2.4M on public policy issues.

Evidence: [11]

!Not Verified

Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Evaluation Overview

F - Malignant

The score turns mainly on Product Integrity, with the largest penalty coming from Human Harm.

Strengths

Product Integrity2/5
Ownership1/10
Governance1/10

Penalties

Human Harm-8
Policy Capture-7
Toxic Products-4
Surveillance Capture-4

Evidence state

ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Linked claims11
Direct axis claims10
Coverage10/16

Scoring Axes

Axis	Score	Why this score
Ownership ? Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.	1 / 10	CVS Health is a shareholder-governed public company, so control over pharmacies, PBM operations, and insurance sits with corporate management and investors rather than patients or workers. CVS Health is a shareholder-governed public company, so control over pharmacies, PBM operations, and insurance sits with corporate management and investors rather than patients or workers. That keeps CVS Health low on Ownership: decisive control remains with shareholders, private owners, executives, or state insiders rather than affected people. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Linked evidence context CVS Health combines retail pharmacies, pharmacy-benefit management through CVS Caremark, Aetna insurance, and other health-services operations. [1] CVS Health is a shareholder-governed public company, so control over pharmacies, PBM operations, and insurance sits with corporate management and investors rather than patients or workers. [2] context CVS's vertically integrated pharmacy, PBM, and insurer structure creates conflicts and pricing opacity that have drawn FTC and attorney-general scrutiny of PBM practices. [3] context The Justice Department filed a civil complaint alleging CVS filled unlawful opioid prescriptions, including excessive quantities, early fills, and dangerous drug combinations, while CVS disputed the allegations. [4] context CVS's opioid-related litigation and controlled-substance dispensing allegations make toxic-product risk material to its score, beyond ordinary pharmacy usefulness. [5] context CVS discloses that it collects, processes, maintains, retains, evaluates, uses, and distributes large quantities of personally identifiable, protected health, financial, and other sensitive data. [6] context CVS's PBM pricing, rebates, pharmacy contracting, insurance integration, and sensitive-data flows are difficult for ordinary patients and customers to evaluate, even where formally disclosed in filings. [7]
Governance ? Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.	1 / 10	CVS Health combines retail pharmacies, pharmacy-benefit management through CVS Caremark, Aetna insurance, and other health-services operations. CVS Health combines retail pharmacies, pharmacy-benefit management through CVS Caremark, Aetna insurance, and other health-services operations. That keeps CVS Health low on Governance: ordinary users, workers, customers, or affected communities cannot change the rules that govern them. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Linked evidence context CVS Health combines retail pharmacies, pharmacy-benefit management through CVS Caremark, Aetna insurance, and other health-services operations. [1] context CVS Health is a shareholder-governed public company, so control over pharmacies, PBM operations, and insurance sits with corporate management and investors rather than patients or workers. [2] context CVS's vertically integrated pharmacy, PBM, and insurer structure creates conflicts and pricing opacity that have drawn FTC and attorney-general scrutiny of PBM practices. [3] context The Justice Department filed a civil complaint alleging CVS filled unlawful opioid prescriptions, including excessive quantities, early fills, and dangerous drug combinations, while CVS disputed the allegations. [4] context CVS's opioid-related litigation and controlled-substance dispensing allegations make toxic-product risk material to its score, beyond ordinary pharmacy usefulness. [5] context CVS discloses that it collects, processes, maintains, retains, evaluates, uses, and distributes large quantities of personally identifiable, protected health, financial, and other sensitive data. [6] context CVS's PBM pricing, rebates, pharmacy contracting, insurance integration, and sensitive-data flows are difficult for ordinary patients and customers to evaluate, even where formally disclosed in filings. [7]
Extraction ? Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.	1 / 10	CVS Health combines retail pharmacies, pharmacy-benefit management through CVS Caremark, Aetna insurance, and other health-services operations. CVS Health combines retail pharmacies, pharmacy-benefit management through CVS Caremark, Aetna insurance, and other health-services operations. That keeps CVS Health low on Extraction: the business model makes extraction from workers, users, suppliers, customers, or the public central rather than incidental. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Linked evidence context CVS Health combines retail pharmacies, pharmacy-benefit management through CVS Caremark, Aetna insurance, and other health-services operations. [1] context CVS Health is a shareholder-governed public company, so control over pharmacies, PBM operations, and insurance sits with corporate management and investors rather than patients or workers. [2] context CVS's vertically integrated pharmacy, PBM, and insurer structure creates conflicts and pricing opacity that have drawn FTC and attorney-general scrutiny of PBM practices. [3] context The Justice Department filed a civil complaint alleging CVS filled unlawful opioid prescriptions, including excessive quantities, early fills, and dangerous drug combinations, while CVS disputed the allegations. [4] context CVS's opioid-related litigation and controlled-substance dispensing allegations make toxic-product risk material to its score, beyond ordinary pharmacy usefulness. [5] context CVS discloses that it collects, processes, maintains, retains, evaluates, uses, and distributes large quantities of personally identifiable, protected health, financial, and other sensitive data. [6] context CVS's PBM pricing, rebates, pharmacy contracting, insurance integration, and sensitive-data flows are difficult for ordinary patients and customers to evaluate, even where formally disclosed in filings. [7]
Labor Sovereignty ? Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.	1 / 7	CVS Health combines retail pharmacies, pharmacy-benefit management through CVS Caremark, Aetna insurance, and other health-services operations. CVS Health combines retail pharmacies, pharmacy-benefit management through CVS Caremark, Aetna insurance, and other health-services operations. That keeps CVS Health low on Labor Sovereignty: labor remains managerially controlled, replaceable, or exposed to coercive employment and contracting conditions. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Linked evidence context CVS Health combines retail pharmacies, pharmacy-benefit management through CVS Caremark, Aetna insurance, and other health-services operations. [1] context CVS Health is a shareholder-governed public company, so control over pharmacies, PBM operations, and insurance sits with corporate management and investors rather than patients or workers. [2] context CVS's vertically integrated pharmacy, PBM, and insurer structure creates conflicts and pricing opacity that have drawn FTC and attorney-general scrutiny of PBM practices. [3] context The Justice Department filed a civil complaint alleging CVS filled unlawful opioid prescriptions, including excessive quantities, early fills, and dangerous drug combinations, while CVS disputed the allegations. [4] context CVS's opioid-related litigation and controlled-substance dispensing allegations make toxic-product risk material to its score, beyond ordinary pharmacy usefulness. [5] context CVS discloses that it collects, processes, maintains, retains, evaluates, uses, and distributes large quantities of personally identifiable, protected health, financial, and other sensitive data. [6] context CVS's PBM pricing, rebates, pharmacy contracting, insurance integration, and sensitive-data flows are difficult for ordinary patients and customers to evaluate, even where formally disclosed in filings. [7]
Solidarity with the Unemployed ? Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.	1 / 7	CVS Health combines retail pharmacies, pharmacy-benefit management through CVS Caremark, Aetna insurance, and other health-services operations. CVS Health combines retail pharmacies, pharmacy-benefit management through CVS Caremark, Aetna insurance, and other health-services operations. That keeps CVS Health low on Solidarity with the Unemployed: the model provides little protection for people who leave, are excluded, or cannot bargain from employment. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Linked evidence context CVS Health combines retail pharmacies, pharmacy-benefit management through CVS Caremark, Aetna insurance, and other health-services operations. [1] context CVS Health is a shareholder-governed public company, so control over pharmacies, PBM operations, and insurance sits with corporate management and investors rather than patients or workers. [2] context CVS's vertically integrated pharmacy, PBM, and insurer structure creates conflicts and pricing opacity that have drawn FTC and attorney-general scrutiny of PBM practices. [3] context The Justice Department filed a civil complaint alleging CVS filled unlawful opioid prescriptions, including excessive quantities, early fills, and dangerous drug combinations, while CVS disputed the allegations. [4] context CVS's opioid-related litigation and controlled-substance dispensing allegations make toxic-product risk material to its score, beyond ordinary pharmacy usefulness. [5] context CVS discloses that it collects, processes, maintains, retains, evaluates, uses, and distributes large quantities of personally identifiable, protected health, financial, and other sensitive data. [6] context CVS's PBM pricing, rebates, pharmacy contracting, insurance integration, and sensitive-data flows are difficult for ordinary patients and customers to evaluate, even where formally disclosed in filings. [7]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity ? Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.	1 / 7	CVS Health combines retail pharmacies, pharmacy-benefit management through CVS Caremark, Aetna insurance, and other health-services operations. CVS Health combines retail pharmacies, pharmacy-benefit management through CVS Caremark, Aetna insurance, and other health-services operations. That keeps CVS Health low on Loss-Bearing Fidelity: losses, hazards, or adjustment costs are routinely pushed onto workers, customers, suppliers, communities, or the public. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Linked evidence context CVS Health combines retail pharmacies, pharmacy-benefit management through CVS Caremark, Aetna insurance, and other health-services operations. [1] context CVS Health is a shareholder-governed public company, so control over pharmacies, PBM operations, and insurance sits with corporate management and investors rather than patients or workers. [2] context CVS's vertically integrated pharmacy, PBM, and insurer structure creates conflicts and pricing opacity that have drawn FTC and attorney-general scrutiny of PBM practices. [3] context The Justice Department filed a civil complaint alleging CVS filled unlawful opioid prescriptions, including excessive quantities, early fills, and dangerous drug combinations, while CVS disputed the allegations. [4] context CVS's opioid-related litigation and controlled-substance dispensing allegations make toxic-product risk material to its score, beyond ordinary pharmacy usefulness. [5] context CVS discloses that it collects, processes, maintains, retains, evaluates, uses, and distributes large quantities of personally identifiable, protected health, financial, and other sensitive data. [6] context CVS's PBM pricing, rebates, pharmacy contracting, insurance integration, and sensitive-data flows are difficult for ordinary patients and customers to evaluate, even where formally disclosed in filings. [7]
Market Conduct ? Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.	1 / 5	CVS's vertically integrated pharmacy, PBM, and insurer structure creates conflicts and pricing opacity that have drawn FTC and attorney-general scrutiny of PBM practices. CVS's vertically integrated pharmacy, PBM, and insurer structure creates conflicts and pricing opacity that have drawn FTC and attorney-general scrutiny of PBM practices. That keeps CVS Health low on Market Conduct: market power, lock-in, coercive pricing, or exclusionary conduct is a major part of the institution's position. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Linked evidence context CVS Health combines retail pharmacies, pharmacy-benefit management through CVS Caremark, Aetna insurance, and other health-services operations. [1] context CVS Health is a shareholder-governed public company, so control over pharmacies, PBM operations, and insurance sits with corporate management and investors rather than patients or workers. [2] CVS's vertically integrated pharmacy, PBM, and insurer structure creates conflicts and pricing opacity that have drawn FTC and attorney-general scrutiny of PBM practices. [3] context The Justice Department filed a civil complaint alleging CVS filled unlawful opioid prescriptions, including excessive quantities, early fills, and dangerous drug combinations, while CVS disputed the allegations. [4] context CVS's opioid-related litigation and controlled-substance dispensing allegations make toxic-product risk material to its score, beyond ordinary pharmacy usefulness. [5] context CVS discloses that it collects, processes, maintains, retains, evaluates, uses, and distributes large quantities of personally identifiable, protected health, financial, and other sensitive data. [6] context CVS's PBM pricing, rebates, pharmacy contracting, insurance integration, and sensitive-data flows are difficult for ordinary patients and customers to evaluate, even where formally disclosed in filings. [7]
Product Integrity ? Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.	2 / 5	CVS Health combines retail pharmacies, pharmacy-benefit management through CVS Caremark, Aetna insurance, and other health-services operations. CVS Health combines retail pharmacies, pharmacy-benefit management through CVS Caremark, Aetna insurance, and other health-services operations. That places CVS Health in the middle of Product Integrity: the product has real use value but is compromised by incentives, monetization, lock-in, quality degradation, or risk. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Linked evidence CVS Health combines retail pharmacies, pharmacy-benefit management through CVS Caremark, Aetna insurance, and other health-services operations. [1] context CVS Health is a shareholder-governed public company, so control over pharmacies, PBM operations, and insurance sits with corporate management and investors rather than patients or workers. [2] context CVS's vertically integrated pharmacy, PBM, and insurer structure creates conflicts and pricing opacity that have drawn FTC and attorney-general scrutiny of PBM practices. [3] context The Justice Department filed a civil complaint alleging CVS filled unlawful opioid prescriptions, including excessive quantities, early fills, and dangerous drug combinations, while CVS disputed the allegations. [4] context CVS's opioid-related litigation and controlled-substance dispensing allegations make toxic-product risk material to its score, beyond ordinary pharmacy usefulness. [5] context CVS discloses that it collects, processes, maintains, retains, evaluates, uses, and distributes large quantities of personally identifiable, protected health, financial, and other sensitive data. [6] context CVS's PBM pricing, rebates, pharmacy contracting, insurance integration, and sensitive-data flows are difficult for ordinary patients and customers to evaluate, even where formally disclosed in filings. [7]
Scale Integrity ? Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.	1 / 5	CVS Health combines retail pharmacies, pharmacy-benefit management through CVS Caremark, Aetna insurance, and other health-services operations. CVS Health combines retail pharmacies, pharmacy-benefit management through CVS Caremark, Aetna insurance, and other health-services operations. That keeps CVS Health low on Scale Integrity: scale magnifies harm, gatekeeping, opacity, or extraction rather than disciplining it. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Linked evidence context CVS Health combines retail pharmacies, pharmacy-benefit management through CVS Caremark, Aetna insurance, and other health-services operations. [1] context CVS Health is a shareholder-governed public company, so control over pharmacies, PBM operations, and insurance sits with corporate management and investors rather than patients or workers. [2] context CVS's vertically integrated pharmacy, PBM, and insurer structure creates conflicts and pricing opacity that have drawn FTC and attorney-general scrutiny of PBM practices. [3] context The Justice Department filed a civil complaint alleging CVS filled unlawful opioid prescriptions, including excessive quantities, early fills, and dangerous drug combinations, while CVS disputed the allegations. [4] context CVS's opioid-related litigation and controlled-substance dispensing allegations make toxic-product risk material to its score, beyond ordinary pharmacy usefulness. [5] context CVS discloses that it collects, processes, maintains, retains, evaluates, uses, and distributes large quantities of personally identifiable, protected health, financial, and other sensitive data. [6] context CVS's PBM pricing, rebates, pharmacy contracting, insurance integration, and sensitive-data flows are difficult for ordinary patients and customers to evaluate, even where formally disclosed in filings. [7]

Penalties

Penalty	Applied	Why this penalty
Human Harm ? Severity, scale, culpability, vulnerable targets, willful reoffense, reputation laundering, pattern escalation, and time decay. Range: -20 to 0.	-8	The Justice Department filed a civil complaint alleging CVS filled unlawful opioid prescriptions, including excessive quantities, early fills, and dangerous drug combinations, while CVS disputed the allegations. The Justice Department filed a civil complaint alleging CVS filled unlawful opioid prescriptions, including excessive quantities, early fills, and dangerous drug combinations, while CVS disputed the allegations. That warrants a substantial Human Harm penalty because ordinary operation, documented misconduct, or institutional power creates serious injury, deprivation, abuse, or foreseeable human damage. The value is substantial but not at the floor because the linked record shows serious conduct without the strongest aggravating factors on this axis. Linked evidence The Justice Department filed a civil complaint alleging CVS filled unlawful opioid prescriptions, including excessive quantities, early fills, and dangerous drug combinations, while CVS disputed the allegations. [4]
Ecological Harm ? Footprint, trajectory, irreversibility, culpability, and scale, including whether ecological harm is central to the model and continued after credible notice. Range: -30 to 0.	-1	The competitor-coverage pass applies an Ecological Harm penalty because the entity's core operations depend on high-volume transport, retail, fuel, facilities, packaging, or other environmentally burdensome activity. The competitor-coverage pass applies an Ecological Harm penalty because the entity's core operations depend on high-volume transport, retail, fuel, facilities, packaging, or other environmentally burdensome activity. That warrants a limited Ecological Harm penalty because the institution causes or defends ecological damage that is more than incidental to the model. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Linked evidence The competitor-coverage pass applies an Ecological Harm penalty because the entity's core operations depend on high-volume transport, retail, fuel, facilities, packaging, or other environmentally burdensome activity. [8]
Policy Capture ? Private-interest attempts to bend law, regulation, subsidies, taxes, enforcement, trade, labor, safety, competition, environmental, healthcare, housing, surveillance, civil-liberties, or consumer policy against workers, customers, citizens, affected communities, or ecological life. Public-interest advocacy is not penalized merely because it is lobbying. Range: -15 to 0.	-7	OpenLobby records CVS HEALTH INC lobbying on tax, PHA, budget with about $2.4M in spending across 30 filings; the reviewed filings document private institutional lobbying over public rules rather than a public-interest advocacy role. OpenLobby records CVS HEALTH INC lobbying on tax, PHA, budget with about $2.4M in spending across 30 filings; the reviewed filings document private institutional lobbying over public rules rather than a public-interest advocacy role. That warrants a substantial Policy Capture penalty because private institutional pressure is being applied to public rules while affected people cannot democratically govern that agenda. The value is substantial but not at the floor because the linked record shows serious conduct without the strongest aggravating factors on this axis. Linked evidence OpenLobby records CVS HEALTH INC lobbying on tax, PHA, budget with about $2.4M in spending across 30 filings; the reviewed filings document private institutional lobbying over public rules rather than a public-interest advocacy role. [10]
Toxic Products ? Current sale of products whose ordinary use, exposure, ingredients, residues, packaging, or formulation creates toxic, addictive, or consumer-safety risk. Food products receive at least light scrutiny for artificial colors, artificial flavors, petro-derived additives, pesticide residues, contaminants, endocrine-disrupting packaging, and ultra-processed formulation. Ordinary adult nightlife or alcohol service is not penalized by itself without evidence of predatory marketing, youth targeting, addiction-extractive design, or unusual product-safety misconduct. Range: -5 to 0.	-4	CVS's opioid-related litigation and controlled-substance dispensing allegations make toxic-product risk material to its score, beyond ordinary pharmacy usefulness. CVS's opioid-related litigation and controlled-substance dispensing allegations make toxic-product risk material to its score, beyond ordinary pharmacy usefulness. That warrants a severe Toxic Products penalty because ordinary use, exposure, ingredients, residues, packaging, or formulation creates material toxic, addictive, or consumer-safety risk. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Linked evidence CVS's opioid-related litigation and controlled-substance dispensing allegations make toxic-product risk material to its score, beyond ordinary pharmacy usefulness. [5]
Accountability Opacity ? Material opacity, reputation laundering, or hidden accountability structures that prevent public accountability. Range: -2 to 0.	-2	CVS's PBM pricing, rebates, pharmacy contracting, insurance integration, and sensitive-data flows are difficult for ordinary patients and customers to evaluate, even where formally disclosed in filings. CVS's PBM pricing, rebates, pharmacy contracting, insurance integration, and sensitive-data flows are difficult for ordinary patients and customers to evaluate, even where formally disclosed in filings. That warrants a severe Accountability Opacity penalty because material facts, risks, conflicts, ownership, or accountability information are obscured from the public. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Linked evidence CVS's PBM pricing, rebates, pharmacy contracting, insurance integration, and sensitive-data flows are difficult for ordinary patients and customers to evaluate, even where formally disclosed in filings. [7]
Surveillance Capture ? Invasive surveillance, unreasonably non-optional tracking, facial recognition, biometric identification, or AI behavior scanning of customers, workers, bystanders, or the public. Range: -5 to 0.	-4	CVS discloses that it collects, processes, maintains, retains, evaluates, uses, and distributes large quantities of personally identifiable, protected health, financial, and other sensitive data. CVS discloses that it collects, processes, maintains, retains, evaluates, uses, and distributes large quantities of personally identifiable, protected health, financial, and other sensitive data. That warrants a severe Surveillance Capture penalty because customers, workers, users, bystanders, or the public are exposed to invasive tracking, biometrics, or behavior scanning. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Linked evidence CVS discloses that it collects, processes, maintains, retains, evaluates, uses, and distributes large quantities of personally identifiable, protected health, financial, and other sensitive data. [6]
Ideological Disavowal ? Concealed ideology presented as neutrality, expertise, professional necessity, public-service administration, market inevitability, or non-ideological common sense while exercising power. Range: -3 to 0.	-2	The competitor-coverage pass applies an Ideological Disavowal penalty because the entity presents ordinary investor-centered market governance, surveillance, or risk-pricing choices as… The competitor-coverage pass applies an Ideological Disavowal penalty because the entity presents ordinary investor-centered market governance, surveillance, or risk-pricing choices as neutral service administration rather than as contested institutional choices. That warrants a substantial Ideological Disavowal penalty because the institution presents situated, contested choices as neutrality, expertise, inevitability, safety, or common sense. The value is substantial but not at the floor because the linked record shows serious conduct without the strongest aggravating factors on this axis. Linked evidence The competitor-coverage pass applies an Ideological Disavowal penalty because the entity presents ordinary investor-centered market governance, surveillance, or risk-pricing choices as neutral service administration rather than as contested institutional choices. [9]

Bonus Credits

No bonus credits applied in this version.

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

Medium 78/100

10 verified linked claims 10 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 10/16 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 18/20

10 verified linked claims

Source quality 16/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 9/18

10 direct claims across 16 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 6/10

10/16 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending

VerificationUnverified

ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)

ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)

Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.

Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

1CVS Health combines retail pharmacies, pharmacy-benefit management through CVS Caremark, Aetna insurance, and other health-services operations.

Product Integrity Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

CVS Health 2024 Annual ReportPrimary institutional record · 90%
CVS Health investor annual reportsPrimary institutional record · 90%

2CVS Health is a shareholder-governed public company, so control over pharmacies, PBM operations, and insurance sits with corporate management and investors rather than patients or workers.

Ownership Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

CVS Health 2024 Annual ReportPrimary institutional record · 90%

3CVS's vertically integrated pharmacy, PBM, and insurer structure creates conflicts and pricing opacity that have drawn FTC and attorney-general scrutiny of PBM practices.

Market Conduct Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

CVS Health 2024 Annual ReportPrimary institutional record · 90%
Axios FTC PBM case stayGeneral web source · 58%

4The Justice Department filed a civil complaint alleging CVS filled unlawful opioid prescriptions, including excessive quantities, early fills, and dangerous drug combinations, while CVS disputed the allegations.

Human Harm Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

AP on DOJ CVS opioid complaintIndependent reporting · 82%

5CVS's opioid-related litigation and controlled-substance dispensing allegations make toxic-product risk material to its score, beyond ordinary pharmacy usefulness.

Toxic Products Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

AP on DOJ CVS opioid complaintIndependent reporting · 82%
CVS opioid responseGeneral web source · 58%

6CVS discloses that it collects, processes, maintains, retains, evaluates, uses, and distributes large quantities of personally identifiable, protected health, financial, and other sensitive data.

Surveillance Capture Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

CVS SEC 2024 10-KPrimary public record · 100%

7CVS's PBM pricing, rebates, pharmacy contracting, insurance integration, and sensitive-data flows are difficult for ordinary patients and customers to evaluate, even where formally disclosed in filings.

Accountability Opacity Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

CVS SEC 2024 10-KPrimary public record · 100%

8The competitor-coverage pass applies an Ecological Harm penalty because the entity's core operations depend on high-volume transport, retail, fuel, facilities, packaging, or other environmentally burdensome activity.

Ecological Harm Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

CVS Health 2024 Annual ReportPrimary institutional record · 90%
CVS Health investor annual reportsPrimary institutional record · 90%

9The competitor-coverage pass applies an Ideological Disavowal penalty because the entity presents ordinary investor-centered market governance, surveillance, or risk-pricing choices as neutral service administration rather than as contested institutional choices.

Ideological Disavowal Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

CVS Health 2024 Annual ReportPrimary institutional record · 90%
CVS Health investor annual reportsPrimary institutional record · 90%

10OpenLobby records CVS HEALTH INC lobbying on tax, PHA, budget with about $2.4M in spending across 30 filings; the reviewed filings document private institutional lobbying over public rules rather than a public-interest advocacy role.

Policy Capture Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

OpenLobby — CVS HEALTH INC lobbying profileGeneral web source · 58%

11CVS Health receives the Private Government badge because it combines large-scale private rule-setting over customers, workers, users, members, or counterparties with OpenLobby-documented lobbying of about $2.4M on public policy issues.

Private Government Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

OpenLobby — CVS HEALTH INC lobbying profileGeneral web source · 58%

Alternatives

Competitors

AGOOD66 Patient Advocate Foundation nonprofit patient case-management and financial-aid resource · same market AGOOD54 Federally Qualified Health Centers publicly supported community health-center system · same market AGOOD53 OpenNotes academic healthcare-transparency initiative · same market AGOOD50 CPESN USA network of independent community pharmacies · same market BQUALIFIED49 Civica Rx nonprofit generic medicine company · same market BQUALIFIED43 Planned Parenthood nonprofit reproductive and sexual healthcare federation · same market CPERFORMATIVE41 En-Vision America / ScriptAbility accessible prescription-labeling company · same market CPERFORMATIVE41 Mark Cuban Cost Plus Drug Company public-benefit online pharmacy · same market

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for CVS Health Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.

View Full Audit Log