education fundraising nonprofit

DonorsChoose

Industry Aid

A nonprofit classroom-funding platform where public-school teachers request materials and donors fund specific projects with published financials. DonorsChoose scores well because ownership is comparatively aligned and the model leaves more value with stakeholders, though person-dependent governance still limits the evaluation.

Why this matters: Fundraising infrastructure can either extract from need or make concrete help easier and more transparent.

Letter grade A Good Medium confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1 Last reviewed May 7, 2026

Final Score 60* A - Good

AGOOD60 pts

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material55

Bonus+10

Cap66No structure cap

After Cap65

Penalties-5

!Not Verified

Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Evaluation Overview

A - Good

The score turns mainly on Ownership, with the largest penalty coming from Reversibility.

Strengths

Ownership8/10
Extraction8/10
Governance7/10

Penalties

Reversibility-5

Evidence state

ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Linked claims8
Direct axis claims7
Coverage7/14

Scoring Axes

Axis	Score	Why this score
Ownership ? Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.	8 / 10	DonorsChoose is a nonprofit platform where public-school teachers request classroom materials and donors fund specific projects. DonorsChoose is a nonprofit platform where public-school teachers request classroom materials and donors fund specific projects. That places DonorsChoose high on Ownership: decisive control is held by workers, users, members, or another stakeholder class rather than outside capital. A still-higher or maximum value requires stronger proof that this structure is durable, broad, and not merely discretionary. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 168 scored entries below, 32 tied, 26 above on Ownership. Linked evidence context DonorsChoose is a nonprofit platform where public-school teachers request classroom materials and donors fund specific projects. [1] context DonorsChoose publishes financial and annual-report information and routes funded projects through a structured procurement model. [2]
Governance ? Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.	7 / 10	DonorsChoose is a nonprofit platform where public-school teachers request classroom materials and donors fund specific projects. DonorsChoose is a nonprofit platform where public-school teachers request classroom materials and donors fund specific projects. That places DonorsChoose in the middle of Governance: there are accountability mechanisms, but they stop short of broad democratic control. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 163 scored entries below, 28 tied, 35 above on Governance. Linked evidence DonorsChoose is a nonprofit platform where public-school teachers request classroom materials and donors fund specific projects. [1] context DonorsChoose publishes financial and annual-report information and routes funded projects through a structured procurement model. [2]
Extraction ? Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.	8 / 10	DonorsChoose is a nonprofit platform where public-school teachers request classroom materials and donors fund specific projects. DonorsChoose is a nonprofit platform where public-school teachers request classroom materials and donors fund specific projects. That places DonorsChoose high on Extraction: surplus is structurally routed toward workers, producers, users, or public benefit instead of being primarily captured upward. A still-higher or maximum value requires stronger proof that this structure is durable, broad, and not merely discretionary. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 173 scored entries below, 34 tied, 19 above on Extraction. Linked evidence context DonorsChoose is a nonprofit platform where public-school teachers request classroom materials and donors fund specific projects. [1] context DonorsChoose publishes financial and annual-report information and routes funded projects through a structured procurement model. [2]
Labor Sovereignty ? Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.	4 / 7	DonorsChoose is a nonprofit platform where public-school teachers request classroom materials and donors fund specific projects. DonorsChoose is a nonprofit platform where public-school teachers request classroom materials and donors fund specific projects. That places DonorsChoose in the middle of Labor Sovereignty: workers or participants have some protection or agency, but not enough binding power to control the relationship. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 112 scored entries below, 39 tied, 75 above on Labor Sovereignty. Linked evidence context DonorsChoose is a nonprofit platform where public-school teachers request classroom materials and donors fund specific projects. [1] context DonorsChoose publishes financial and annual-report information and routes funded projects through a structured procurement model. [2]
Solidarity with the Unemployed ? Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.	6 / 7	DonorsChoose is a nonprofit platform where public-school teachers request classroom materials and donors fund specific projects. DonorsChoose is a nonprofit platform where public-school teachers request classroom materials and donors fund specific projects. That places DonorsChoose high on Solidarity with the Unemployed: the institution materially supports people outside ordinary employment rather than treating exit as abandonment. A still-higher or maximum value requires stronger proof that this structure is durable, broad, and not merely discretionary. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 197 scored entries below, 22 tied, 7 above on Solidarity with the Unemployed. Linked evidence context DonorsChoose is a nonprofit platform where public-school teachers request classroom materials and donors fund specific projects. [1] context DonorsChoose publishes financial and annual-report information and routes funded projects through a structured procurement model. [2]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity ? Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.	7 / 7	DonorsChoose is a nonprofit platform where public-school teachers request classroom materials and donors fund specific projects. DonorsChoose is a nonprofit platform where public-school teachers request classroom materials and donors fund specific projects. That places DonorsChoose high on Loss-Bearing Fidelity: the institution is structured to absorb real costs rather than shifting losses onto weaker parties. A still-higher or maximum value requires stronger proof that this structure is durable, broad, and not merely discretionary. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 218 scored entries below, 8 tied, 0 above on Loss-Bearing Fidelity. Linked evidence context DonorsChoose is a nonprofit platform where public-school teachers request classroom materials and donors fund specific projects. [1] context DonorsChoose publishes financial and annual-report information and routes funded projects through a structured procurement model. [2]
Market Conduct ? Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.	5 / 5	DonorsChoose is a nonprofit platform where public-school teachers request classroom materials and donors fund specific projects. DonorsChoose is a nonprofit platform where public-school teachers request classroom materials and donors fund specific projects. That places DonorsChoose high on Market Conduct: pricing, access, switching, and bargaining practices show restraint compared with ordinary rent-seeking competitors. A still-higher or maximum value requires stronger proof that this structure is durable, broad, and not merely discretionary. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 180 scored entries below, 46 tied, 0 above on Market Conduct. Linked evidence context DonorsChoose is a nonprofit platform where public-school teachers request classroom materials and donors fund specific projects. [1] context DonorsChoose publishes financial and annual-report information and routes funded projects through a structured procurement model. [2]
Product Integrity ? Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.	5 / 5	DonorsChoose publishes financial and annual-report information and routes funded projects through a structured procurement model. DonorsChoose publishes financial and annual-report information and routes funded projects through a structured procurement model. That places DonorsChoose high on Product Integrity: the core offering is genuinely useful and comparatively less dependent on traps, degradation, or harmful dependencies. A still-higher or maximum value requires stronger proof that this structure is durable, broad, and not merely discretionary. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 134 scored entries below, 92 tied, 0 above on Product Integrity. Linked evidence context DonorsChoose is a nonprofit platform where public-school teachers request classroom materials and donors fund specific projects. [1] DonorsChoose publishes financial and annual-report information and routes funded projects through a structured procurement model. [2]
Scale Integrity ? Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.	5 / 5	DonorsChoose is a nonprofit platform where public-school teachers request classroom materials and donors fund specific projects. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 191 scored entries below, 35 tied, 0 above on Scale Integrity. Linked evidence context DonorsChoose is a nonprofit platform where public-school teachers request classroom materials and donors fund specific projects. [1] context DonorsChoose publishes financial and annual-report information and routes funded projects through a structured procurement model. [2]

Penalties

Penalty	Applied	Why this penalty
Reversibility ? Applied when positive conduct depends on current living leaders, founders, family owners, or other person-contingent governance rather than durable structure. Range: -5 to 0.	-5	The organization’s positive conduct depends materially on current leadership, nonprofit or platform policy, accreditation rules, religious culture, or discretionary operating practice rather than on locked worker or affected-stakeholder control. The organization’s positive conduct depends materially on current leadership, nonprofit or platform policy, accreditation rules, religious culture, or discretionary operating practice rather than on locked worker or affected-stakeholder control. That warrants a severe Reversibility penalty because favorable conduct depends on current people or discretionary leadership rather than locked stakeholder structure. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 0 scored entries below, 95 tied, 131 above on Reversibility. Linked evidence The organization’s positive conduct depends materially on current leadership, nonprofit or platform policy, accreditation rules, religious culture, or discretionary operating practice rather than on locked worker or affected-stakeholder control. [7]

Bonus Credits

Bonus	Credit	Why this credit
Openness to Dissent ? Credit for tolerating internal, user, customer, worker, and public dissent without retaliation, capture, or viewpoint laundering.	2 / 3	Teacher-initiated projects give frontline educators agenda-setting power inside the platform’s constraints. Teacher-initiated projects give frontline educators agenda-setting power inside the platform’s constraints. That supports partial Openness to Dissent credit because people can criticize, dissent, or challenge the institution without being managed into silence. The value remains partial because the linked record does not show the practice as comprehensive, durable, or central enough for full credit. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 200 scored entries below, 15 tied, 11 above on Openness to Dissent. Linked evidence Teacher-initiated projects give frontline educators agenda-setting power inside the platform’s constraints. [3]
Constitutional Spirit ? Credit for respecting constitutional rights and civil-liberties norms even where private law does not strictly require it.	2 / 3	DonorsChoose supports public-school classrooms without making aid contingent on ideology, belief, or membership. DonorsChoose supports public-school classrooms without making aid contingent on ideology, belief, or membership. That supports partial Constitutional Spirit credit because the institution respects speech, privacy, due process, conscience, or civil-liberties norms beyond bare legal compulsion. The value remains partial because the linked record does not show the practice as comprehensive, durable, or central enough for full credit. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 188 scored entries below, 23 tied, 15 above on Constitutional Spirit. Linked evidence DonorsChoose supports public-school classrooms without making aid contingent on ideology, belief, or membership. [4]
Good Deal ? Credit for unusually fair value: durable quality, fair pricing, low lock-in, and clear customer surplus.	3 / 3	The platform creates direct value by letting donors fund concrete classroom materials requested by teachers. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 200 scored entries below, 26 tied, 0 above on Good Deal. Linked evidence The platform creates direct value by letting donors fund concrete classroom materials requested by teachers. [5]
Cost Transparency ? Credit for clear posted prices, all-in fees, unit costs, public rate cards, margin/cost visibility, or surplus-allocation transparency, especially in markets where opaque quotes, hidden fees, or individualized pricing are normal.	3 / 3	DonorsChoose publishes financial information, project-level requests, and fulfillment information that make donor outcomes concrete. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 214 scored entries below, 12 tied, 0 above on Cost Transparency. Linked evidence DonorsChoose publishes financial information, project-level requests, and fulfillment information that make donor outcomes concrete. [6]

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

Medium 68/100

8 verified linked claims 7 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 7/14 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 13/20

8 verified linked claims

Source quality 12/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 9/18

7 direct claims across 14 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 5/10

7/14 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending

VerificationUnverified

ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)

ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)

Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.

Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

1DonorsChoose is a nonprofit platform where public-school teachers request classroom materials and donors fund specific projects.

Governance Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 7, 2026

DonorsChoose AboutOfficial self-description · 68%

2DonorsChoose publishes financial and annual-report information and routes funded projects through a structured procurement model.

Product Integrity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 7, 2026

DonorsChoose FinancialsGeneral web source · 58%

3Teacher-initiated projects give frontline educators agenda-setting power inside the platform’s constraints.

Openness To Dissent Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 7, 2026

DonorsChoose AboutOfficial self-description · 68%

4DonorsChoose supports public-school classrooms without making aid contingent on ideology, belief, or membership.

Constitutional Spirit Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 7, 2026

DonorsChoose AboutOfficial self-description · 68%

5The platform creates direct value by letting donors fund concrete classroom materials requested by teachers.

Good Deal Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 7, 2026

DonorsChoose AboutOfficial self-description · 68%

6DonorsChoose publishes financial information, project-level requests, and fulfillment information that make donor outcomes concrete.

Cost Transparency Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 7, 2026

DonorsChoose FinancialsGeneral web source · 58%

7The organization’s positive conduct depends materially on current leadership, nonprofit or platform policy, accreditation rules, religious culture, or discretionary operating practice rather than on locked worker or affected-stakeholder control.

Reversibility Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 7, 2026

DonorsChoose AboutOfficial self-description · 68%

8DonorsChoose's public materials state a mission, values, ownership model, advocacy role, or institutional standpoint plainly enough that this record does not identify penalty-level neutrality theater.

Ideological Disavowal Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 9, 2026

AI scaffold

DonorsChoose official siteGeneral web source · 58%
DonorsChoose AboutOfficial self-description · 68%
DonorsChoose FinancialsGeneral web source · 58%

Alternatives

Competitors

AGOOD65 FoodFinder national food pantry locator nonprofit · same market AGOOD65 National Runaway Safeline 24/7 youth crisis and runaway support line · same market AGOOD65 RAINN national sexual assault hotline and survivor-support nonprofit · same market AGOOD64 StrongHearts Native Helpline Native domestic and sexual violence helpline · same market AGOOD62 National Domestic Violence Hotline 24/7 domestic violence support hotline and resource directory · same market AGOOD61 GiveDirectly humanitarian cash-transfer nonprofit · same market AGOOD59 Undue Medical Debt nonprofit medical-debt relief organization · same market AGOOD58 Dollar For nonprofit hospital charity-care assistance organization · same market

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for DonorsChoose Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

May 7, 2026 at 12:00 AM UTC ai-scaffolding directory-expansion

Added source-backed evaluation during accreditation/watchdog, charity/humanitarian, fundraising-platform, and religious-institution expansion pass.

View Full Audit Log