The E.W. Scripps Company

public local television, news, and broadcast-network company

The E.W. Scripps Company

Industry News

A public media company operating local television stations, Scripps News, ION, Court TV, and other broadcast or streaming networks. Scripps has stronger public-service journalism signals than many commercial peers, but shareholder governance, advertising economics, and platform data practices prevent a high score.

Why this matters: Scripps belongs beside Nexstar, TEGNA, Gray Media, Sinclair, Gannett, Fox, and nonprofit news alternatives.

Letter grade D Extractive High confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1

Final Score 9* D - Extractive
DEXTRACTIVE9 tentative score pts

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material16
Bonus+1
Cap35Ownership <= 2 and Governance <= 2
After Cap17
Penalties-8
!Not Verified
Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Evaluation Overview

D - Extractive

The score turns mainly on Product Integrity, with the largest penalty coming from Accountability Opacity.

Strengths

  • Product Integrity3/5
  • Extraction2/10
  • Solidarity with the Unemployed2/7

Penalties

  • Accountability Opacity-2
  • Surveillance Capture-2
  • Ecological Harm-1
  • Youth Capture-1

Evidence state

  • ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)
  • ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
  • Linked claims25
  • Direct axis claims16
  • Coverage16/16

Scoring Axes
Axis Score Why this score
Ownership
?
Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.
1 / 10

The E.W.

Linked evidence
  • The E.W. Scripps Company is controlled through corporate ownership and executive management rather than listener, viewer, worker, newsroom, or affected-community ownership. [1]
Governance
?
Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.
1 / 10

The E.W.

Linked evidence
  • The E.W. Scripps Company does not provide binding democratic governance for workers, audiences, local communities, or other affected stakeholders over its media operations. [2]
Extraction
?
Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.
2 / 10

The E.W.

Linked evidence
  • The E.W. Scripps Company monetizes attention and audience access through advertising, distribution, subscription, or investor-return structures, so useful media access remains tied to extractive revenue pressure. [3]
Labor Sovereignty
?
Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.
1 / 7

The E.W.

Linked evidence
  • The E.W. Scripps Company appears to provide conventional media employment rather than worker-controlled labor governance, co-determination, or durable collective authority. [4]
Solidarity with the Unemployed
?
Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.
2 / 7

The E.W.

Linked evidence
  • The E.W. Scripps Company receives limited credit where its programming or audience role serves underserved communities, but the record does not show robust institutional support for workers outside employment or audiences outside monetizable segments. [5]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity
?
Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.
2 / 7

The E.W.

Linked evidence
  • The E.W. Scripps Company has some public-service or local-media function, but the evidence does not show a durable willingness to absorb major financial losses to protect workers, communities, or editorial independence. [6]
Market Conduct
?
Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.
2 / 5

The E.W.

Linked evidence
  • The E.W. Scripps Company competes in commercial media markets through advertising, distribution, retransmission, or audience aggregation, producing moderate lock-in and bargaining-power concerns. [7]
Product Integrity
?
Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.
3 / 5

The E.W.

Linked evidence
  • The E.W. Scripps Company provides real news, audio, entertainment, or cultural access, while product quality is constrained by advertising load, platform packaging, syndication, or centralized commercial priorities. [8]
Scale Integrity
?
Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.
2 / 5

The E.W.

Linked evidence
  • The E.W. Scripps Company shows the mixed scale pattern of commercial media: reach expands access, but consolidation weakens local accountability and concentrates agenda-setting or advertising power. [9]

Penalties
Penalty Applied Why this penalty
Ecological Harm
?
Footprint, trajectory, irreversibility, culpability, and scale, including whether ecological harm is central to the model and continued after credible notice. Range: -30 to 0.
-1

The E.W.

Linked evidence
  • The E.W. Scripps Company has a lower direct ecological footprint than heavy industry, but large broadcast, office, event, streaming, and digital-advertising infrastructure still creates some material footprint. [18]
Youth Capture
?
Manipulative youth-directed marketing, youth-data or attention monetization, collectible/add-on traps, parasocial or identity capture, surprise mechanics, or treating young people as lower-disclosure consumers. Making useful toys or welcoming children is not itself penalized. Range: -5 to 0.
-1

The E.W.

Linked evidence
  • The E.W. Scripps Company operates audience, entertainment, contest, app, or advertising systems that can reach younger audiences, creating some youth-attention and youth-data concern even if children are not the sole market. [20]
Accountability Opacity
?
Material opacity, reputation laundering, or hidden accountability structures that prevent public accountability. Range: -2 to 0.
-2

The E.W.

Linked evidence
  • The E.W. Scripps Company gives basic corporate and privacy disclosures, but ownership, advertising, data-sharing, distribution economics, and editorial-control implications remain difficult for ordinary audiences to evaluate. [22]
Identity Capture
?
Customer pressure, employee pressure, and pervasive identity saturation. Range: -3 to 0.
-1

The E.W.

Linked evidence
  • The E.W. Scripps Company builds loyalty around lifestyle, local identity, political identity, religious identity, fandom, music taste, or community affiliation, turning identity into monetizable audience capture. [23]
Surveillance Capture
?
Invasive surveillance, unreasonably non-optional tracking, facial recognition, biometric identification, or AI behavior scanning of customers, workers, bystanders, or the public. Range: -5 to 0.
-2

The E.W.

Linked evidence
  • The E.W. Scripps Company privacy materials describe collection, sharing, targeting, analytics, app, cookie, or advertising uses of personal information across digital media services. [24]
Ideological Disavowal
?
Concealed ideology presented as neutrality, expertise, professional necessity, public-service administration, market inevitability, or non-ideological common sense while exercising power. Range: -3 to 0.
-1

The E.W.

Linked evidence
  • The E.W. Scripps Company is penalized only where it presents commercially or institutionally situated media judgment as neutral public service without fully exposing the underlying ownership, advertising, or editorial incentives. [25]

Bonus Credits
Bonus Credit Why this credit
Constitutional Spirit
?
Credit for respecting constitutional rights and civil-liberties norms even where private law does not strictly require it.
1 / 3

The E.W.

Linked evidence
  • The E.W. Scripps Company receives limited credit where local journalism or public-affairs programming supports civic information, but the structure is still commercial and management-controlled. [11]

Confidence Basis

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

High 82/100

25 verified linked claims 16 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 16/16 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 13/20

25 verified linked claims

Source quality 16/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 14/18

16 direct claims across 16 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 10/10

16/16 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending
VerificationUnverified
ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.
Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.
1The E.W. Scripps Company is controlled through corporate ownership and executive management rather than listener, viewer, worker, newsroom, or affected-community ownership.

Ownership Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

2The E.W. Scripps Company does not provide binding democratic governance for workers, audiences, local communities, or other affected stakeholders over its media operations.

Governance Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

3The E.W. Scripps Company monetizes attention and audience access through advertising, distribution, subscription, or investor-return structures, so useful media access remains tied to extractive revenue pressure.

Extraction Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

4The E.W. Scripps Company appears to provide conventional media employment rather than worker-controlled labor governance, co-determination, or durable collective authority.

Labor Sovereignty Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

5The E.W. Scripps Company receives limited credit where its programming or audience role serves underserved communities, but the record does not show robust institutional support for workers outside employment or audiences outside monetizable segments.

Solidarity Unemployed Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

6The E.W. Scripps Company has some public-service or local-media function, but the evidence does not show a durable willingness to absorb major financial losses to protect workers, communities, or editorial independence.

Loss Bearing Fidelity Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

7The E.W. Scripps Company competes in commercial media markets through advertising, distribution, retransmission, or audience aggregation, producing moderate lock-in and bargaining-power concerns.

Market Conduct Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

8The E.W. Scripps Company provides real news, audio, entertainment, or cultural access, while product quality is constrained by advertising load, platform packaging, syndication, or centralized commercial priorities.

Product Integrity Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

9The E.W. Scripps Company shows the mixed scale pattern of commercial media: reach expands access, but consolidation weakens local accountability and concentrates agenda-setting or advertising power.

Scale Integrity Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

10The available public record for The E.W. Scripps Company does not show unusually strong, binding protection for worker, audience, newsroom, or public dissent beyond ordinary corporate process.

Openness To Dissent Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

11The E.W. Scripps Company receives limited credit where local journalism or public-affairs programming supports civic information, but the structure is still commercial and management-controlled.

Constitutional Spirit Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

12The E.W. Scripps Company offers some free or broadly available media access, but the value is paid for through advertising, data collection, attention capture, or bundled distribution economics.

Good Deal Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

13The E.W. Scripps Company does not provide unusually clear public cost, margin, advertising, retransmission, or surplus-allocation transparency for audiences and affected communities.

Cost Transparency Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

14The available public record for The E.W. Scripps Company does not document a rare non-punitive anti-mobbing or anti-scapegoating institutional practice strong enough for this bonus.

Anti Scapegoating Culture Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

15The score for The E.W. Scripps Company is not being raised because of a specific living founder or leader whose personal control would make the positive conduct unusually reversible.

Reversibility Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

16The available evidence for The E.W. Scripps Company does not describes conduct considered under Human Harm beyond ordinary commercial-media harms already captured elsewhere.

Human Harm Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

17The available evidence for The E.W. Scripps Company does not show direct institutional coercive violence, armed repression, detention abuse, or violent domination.

Coercive Violence Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

18The E.W. Scripps Company has a lower direct ecological footprint than heavy industry, but large broadcast, office, event, streaming, and digital-advertising infrastructure still creates some material footprint.

Ecological Harm Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

19The ordinary use of The E.W. Scripps Company media products does not itself create a material toxic-product exposure comparable to chemicals, weapons, tobacco, or unsafe consumer goods.

Toxic Products Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

20The E.W. Scripps Company operates audience, entertainment, contest, app, or advertising systems that can reach younger audiences, creating some youth-attention and youth-data concern even if children are not the sole market.

Youth Capture Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

21The E.W. Scripps Company retains conduct relevant to the this penalty: where recurring subscriptions, bundled distribution, account registration, or cancellation-friction risks are material to the consumer relationship.

Subscription Capture Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

22The E.W. Scripps Company gives basic corporate and privacy disclosures, but ownership, advertising, data-sharing, distribution economics, and editorial-control implications remain difficult for ordinary audiences to evaluate.

Accountability Opacity Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

23The E.W. Scripps Company builds loyalty around lifestyle, local identity, political identity, religious identity, fandom, music taste, or community affiliation, turning identity into monetizable audience capture.

Identity Capture Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

24The E.W. Scripps Company privacy materials describe collection, sharing, targeting, analytics, app, cookie, or advertising uses of personal information across digital media services.

Surveillance Capture Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

25The E.W. Scripps Company is penalized only where it presents commercially or institutionally situated media judgment as neutral public service without fully exposing the underlying ownership, advertising, or editorial incentives.

Ideological Disavowal Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

Alternatives

AGOOD55 tentative score ProPublica nonprofit investigative newsroom · same market BQUALIFIED43 tentative score Associated Press nonprofit news cooperative · same market BQUALIFIED43 tentative score NPR nonprofit public-radio news network · same market AGOOD56 tentative score Street Roots nonprofit street newspaper and resource guide · Oregon, Pacific Northwest BQUALIFIED45 tentative score The Guardian trust-owned news organization · United Kingdom

Competitors

AGOOD55 tentative score ProPublica nonprofit investigative newsroom · same market BQUALIFIED43 tentative score Associated Press nonprofit news cooperative · same market BQUALIFIED43 tentative score NPR nonprofit public-radio news network · same market DEXTRACTIVE28 tentative score The New York Times Company public newspaper and digital subscription company · same market DEXTRACTIVE25 tentative score Bloomberg LP / Bloomberg News financial data and news company · same market DEXTRACTIVE25 tentative score Dow Jones / The Wall Street Journal business news and newspaper company · same market DEXTRACTIVE24 tentative score The Atlantic magazine and digital media company · same market DEXTRACTIVE22 tentative score Axios digital news company · same market

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for The E.W. Scripps Company Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.

View Full Audit Log