business newspaper and digital news organization

Financial Times

Industry News

A global business newspaper and digital news organization owned by Nikkei. It is serious and useful journalism, but its elite paywall and market orientation mean it serves power more readily than the general public.

Why this matters: The Financial Times has high information value and relatively serious journalism, but elite paywall economics and corporate ownership keep it mid-spectrum.

Letter grade D Extractive Medium confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1 Parent / owner: Nikkei Last reviewed May 8, 2026

The Financial Times is owned by Nikkei, which is now listed separately.

Final Score 33* D - Extractive

DEXTRACTIVE33 pts

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material39

Bonus+3

Cap41Ownership <= 4 and Governance <= 4

After Cap41

Penalties-8

!Not Verified

Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Owned by Nikkei

The parent profile is currently rated D (Extractive, 26*). This subsidiary is not mechanically capped at the parent score, but parent control is part of the ownership, governance, policy, accountability opacity, reversibility, and harm analysis.

Evaluation Overview

D - Extractive

The score turns mainly on Extraction, with the largest penalty coming from Accountability Opacity.

Strengths

Extraction6/10
Loss-Bearing Fidelity5/7
Product Integrity5/5

Penalties

Accountability Opacity-2
Identity Capture-2
Human Harm-1
Ecological Harm-1

Evidence state

ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Linked claims12
Direct axis claims11
Coverage11/18

Scoring Axes

Axis	Score	Why this score
Ownership ? Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.	3 / 10	Financial Times is structured as private-company subsidiary, not as a worker-, reader-, author-, or public cooperative. Financial Times is structured as private-company subsidiary, not as a worker-, reader-, author-, or public cooperative. That keeps Financial Times low on Ownership: decisive control remains with shareholders, private owners, executives, or state insiders rather than affected people. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Second-layer publishing/news pass; calibrated against major academic publishers, technical publishers, global news brands, magazines, and media conglomerates. Uncertainty Focused second-layer category pass; later review should add more labor, pricing, ownership, editorial, and user-data evidence. Linked evidence Financial Times is structured as private-company subsidiary, not as a worker-, reader-, author-, or public cooperative. [1] context A global business newspaper and digital news organization owned by Nikkei. [2] context The Financial Times has high information value and relatively serious journalism, but elite paywall economics and corporate ownership keep it mid-spectrum. [3]
Governance ? Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.	4 / 10	Financial Times is structured as private-company subsidiary, not as a worker-, reader-, author-, or public cooperative. Financial Times is structured as private-company subsidiary, not as a worker-, reader-, author-, or public cooperative. That places Financial Times in the middle of Governance: there are accountability mechanisms, but they stop short of broad democratic control. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Second-layer publishing/news pass; calibrated against major academic publishers, technical publishers, global news brands, magazines, and media conglomerates. Uncertainty Focused second-layer category pass; later review should add more labor, pricing, ownership, editorial, and user-data evidence. Linked evidence context Financial Times is structured as private-company subsidiary, not as a worker-, reader-, author-, or public cooperative. [1] context A global business newspaper and digital news organization owned by Nikkei. [2] context The Financial Times has high information value and relatively serious journalism, but elite paywall economics and corporate ownership keep it mid-spectrum. [3]
Extraction ? Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.	6 / 10	Financial Times is structured as private-company subsidiary, not as a worker-, reader-, author-, or public cooperative. Financial Times is structured as private-company subsidiary, not as a worker-, reader-, author-, or public cooperative. That places Financial Times in the middle of Extraction: the institution creates real value but still leaves room for rent extraction, unequal bargaining, or surplus capture. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Second-layer publishing/news pass; calibrated against major academic publishers, technical publishers, global news brands, magazines, and media conglomerates. Uncertainty Focused second-layer category pass; later review should add more labor, pricing, ownership, editorial, and user-data evidence. Linked evidence context Financial Times is structured as private-company subsidiary, not as a worker-, reader-, author-, or public cooperative. [1] context A global business newspaper and digital news organization owned by Nikkei. [2] context The Financial Times has high information value and relatively serious journalism, but elite paywall economics and corporate ownership keep it mid-spectrum. [3]
Labor Sovereignty ? Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.	4 / 7	Financial Times is structured as private-company subsidiary, not as a worker-, reader-, author-, or public cooperative. Financial Times is structured as private-company subsidiary, not as a worker-, reader-, author-, or public cooperative. That places Financial Times in the middle of Labor Sovereignty: workers or participants have some protection or agency, but not enough binding power to control the relationship. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Second-layer publishing/news pass; calibrated against major academic publishers, technical publishers, global news brands, magazines, and media conglomerates. Uncertainty Focused second-layer category pass; later review should add more labor, pricing, ownership, editorial, and user-data evidence. Linked evidence context Financial Times is structured as private-company subsidiary, not as a worker-, reader-, author-, or public cooperative. [1] context A global business newspaper and digital news organization owned by Nikkei. [2] context The Financial Times has high information value and relatively serious journalism, but elite paywall economics and corporate ownership keep it mid-spectrum. [3]
Solidarity with the Unemployed ? Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.	4 / 7	Financial Times is structured as private-company subsidiary, not as a worker-, reader-, author-, or public cooperative. Financial Times is structured as private-company subsidiary, not as a worker-, reader-, author-, or public cooperative. That places Financial Times in the middle of Solidarity with the Unemployed: some access, severance, retraining, openness, or mutual-aid value is present, but it is not central or durable. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Second-layer publishing/news pass; calibrated against major academic publishers, technical publishers, global news brands, magazines, and media conglomerates. Uncertainty Focused second-layer category pass; later review should add more labor, pricing, ownership, editorial, and user-data evidence. Linked evidence context Financial Times is structured as private-company subsidiary, not as a worker-, reader-, author-, or public cooperative. [1] context A global business newspaper and digital news organization owned by Nikkei. [2] context The Financial Times has high information value and relatively serious journalism, but elite paywall economics and corporate ownership keep it mid-spectrum. [3]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity ? Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.	5 / 7	Financial Times is structured as private-company subsidiary, not as a worker-, reader-, author-, or public cooperative. Financial Times is structured as private-company subsidiary, not as a worker-, reader-, author-, or public cooperative. That places Financial Times in the middle of Loss-Bearing Fidelity: there is some willingness to preserve obligations, but the record still leaves meaningful risk-shifting concerns. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Second-layer publishing/news pass; calibrated against major academic publishers, technical publishers, global news brands, magazines, and media conglomerates. Uncertainty Focused second-layer category pass; later review should add more labor, pricing, ownership, editorial, and user-data evidence. Linked evidence context Financial Times is structured as private-company subsidiary, not as a worker-, reader-, author-, or public cooperative. [1] context A global business newspaper and digital news organization owned by Nikkei. [2] context The Financial Times has high information value and relatively serious journalism, but elite paywall economics and corporate ownership keep it mid-spectrum. [3]
Market Conduct ? Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.	3 / 5	Financial Times is structured as private-company subsidiary, not as a worker-, reader-, author-, or public cooperative. Financial Times is structured as private-company subsidiary, not as a worker-, reader-, author-, or public cooperative. That places Financial Times in the middle of Market Conduct: the product has real value but still uses meaningful lock-in, gatekeeping, market power, or dependency. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Second-layer publishing/news pass; calibrated against major academic publishers, technical publishers, global news brands, magazines, and media conglomerates. Uncertainty Focused second-layer category pass; later review should add more labor, pricing, ownership, editorial, and user-data evidence. Linked evidence context Financial Times is structured as private-company subsidiary, not as a worker-, reader-, author-, or public cooperative. [1] context A global business newspaper and digital news organization owned by Nikkei. [2] context The Financial Times has high information value and relatively serious journalism, but elite paywall economics and corporate ownership keep it mid-spectrum. [3]
Product Integrity ? Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.	5 / 5	A global business newspaper and digital news organization owned by Nikkei. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Second-layer publishing/news pass; calibrated against major academic publishers, technical publishers, global news brands, magazines, and media conglomerates. Uncertainty Focused second-layer category pass; later review should add more labor, pricing, ownership, editorial, and user-data evidence. Linked evidence context Financial Times is structured as private-company subsidiary, not as a worker-, reader-, author-, or public cooperative. [1] A global business newspaper and digital news organization owned by Nikkei. [2] context The Financial Times has high information value and relatively serious journalism, but elite paywall economics and corporate ownership keep it mid-spectrum. [3]
Scale Integrity ? Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.	5 / 5	Financial Times is structured as private-company subsidiary, not as a worker-, reader-, author-, or public cooperative. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Second-layer publishing/news pass; calibrated against major academic publishers, technical publishers, global news brands, magazines, and media conglomerates. Uncertainty Focused second-layer category pass; later review should add more labor, pricing, ownership, editorial, and user-data evidence. Linked evidence context Financial Times is structured as private-company subsidiary, not as a worker-, reader-, author-, or public cooperative. [1] context A global business newspaper and digital news organization owned by Nikkei. [2] context The Financial Times has high information value and relatively serious journalism, but elite paywall economics and corporate ownership keep it mid-spectrum. [3]

Penalties

Penalty	Applied	Why this penalty
Human Harm ? Severity, scale, culpability, vulnerable targets, willful reoffense, reputation laundering, pattern escalation, and time decay. Range: -20 to 0.	-1	Financial Times retains conduct relevant to the human harm penalty: the record shows a concrete concern on that axis in this sector. Financial Times retains conduct relevant to the human harm penalty: the record shows a concrete concern on that axis in this sector. That warrants a limited Human Harm penalty because ordinary operation, documented misconduct, or institutional power creates serious injury, deprivation, abuse, or foreseeable human damage. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Second-layer publishing/news pass; calibrated against major academic publishers, technical publishers, global news brands, magazines, and media conglomerates. Uncertainty Focused second-layer category pass; later review should add more labor, pricing, ownership, editorial, and user-data evidence. Linked evidence Financial Times retains conduct relevant to the human harm penalty: the record shows a concrete concern on that axis in this sector. [7]
Ecological Harm ? Footprint, trajectory, irreversibility, culpability, and scale, including whether ecological harm is central to the model and continued after credible notice. Range: -30 to 0.	-1	Financial Times retains conduct relevant to the ecological harm penalty: the record shows a concrete concern on that axis in this sector. Financial Times retains conduct relevant to the ecological harm penalty: the record shows a concrete concern on that axis in this sector. That warrants a limited Ecological Harm penalty because the institution causes or defends ecological damage that is more than incidental to the model. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Second-layer publishing/news pass; calibrated against major academic publishers, technical publishers, global news brands, magazines, and media conglomerates. Uncertainty Focused second-layer category pass; later review should add more labor, pricing, ownership, editorial, and user-data evidence. Linked evidence Financial Times retains conduct relevant to the ecological harm penalty: the record shows a concrete concern on that axis in this sector. [8]
Accountability Opacity ? Material opacity, reputation laundering, or hidden accountability structures that prevent public accountability. Range: -2 to 0.	-2	Financial Times retains conduct relevant to the accountability-opacity penalty: the record shows a concrete concern on that axis in this sector. Financial Times retains conduct relevant to the accountability-opacity penalty: the record shows a concrete concern on that axis in this sector. That warrants a severe Accountability Opacity penalty because material facts, risks, conflicts, ownership, or accountability information are obscured from the public. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Second-layer publishing/news pass; calibrated against major academic publishers, technical publishers, global news brands, magazines, and media conglomerates. Uncertainty Focused second-layer category pass; later review should add more labor, pricing, ownership, editorial, and user-data evidence. Linked evidence Financial Times retains conduct relevant to the accountability-opacity penalty: the record shows a concrete concern on that axis in this sector. [9]
Identity Capture ? Customer pressure, employee pressure, and pervasive identity saturation. Range: -3 to 0.	-2	Financial Times retains conduct relevant to the identity capture penalty: the record shows a concrete concern on that axis in this sector. Financial Times retains conduct relevant to the identity capture penalty: the record shows a concrete concern on that axis in this sector. That warrants a substantial Identity Capture penalty because users, workers, customers, or publics are pressured into identity attachment that protects institutional power. The value is substantial but not at the floor because the linked record shows serious conduct without the strongest aggravating factors on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Second-layer publishing/news pass; calibrated against major academic publishers, technical publishers, global news brands, magazines, and media conglomerates. Uncertainty Focused second-layer category pass; later review should add more labor, pricing, ownership, editorial, and user-data evidence. Linked evidence Financial Times retains conduct relevant to the identity capture penalty: the record shows a concrete concern on that axis in this sector. [10]
Surveillance Capture ? Invasive surveillance, unreasonably non-optional tracking, facial recognition, biometric identification, or AI behavior scanning of customers, workers, bystanders, or the public. Range: -5 to 0.	-1	Financial Times retains conduct relevant to the surveillance capture penalty: the record shows a concrete concern on that axis in this sector. Financial Times retains conduct relevant to the surveillance capture penalty: the record shows a concrete concern on that axis in this sector. That warrants a limited Surveillance Capture penalty because customers, workers, users, bystanders, or the public are exposed to invasive tracking, biometrics, or behavior scanning. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Second-layer publishing/news pass; calibrated against major academic publishers, technical publishers, global news brands, magazines, and media conglomerates. Uncertainty Focused second-layer category pass; later review should add more labor, pricing, ownership, editorial, and user-data evidence. Linked evidence Financial Times retains conduct relevant to the surveillance capture penalty: the record shows a concrete concern on that axis in this sector. [11]
Ideological Disavowal ? Concealed ideology presented as neutrality, expertise, professional necessity, public-service administration, market inevitability, or non-ideological common sense while exercising power. Range: -3 to 0.	-1	Financial Times's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Financial Times shows bounded neutrality theater: some contested choices are softened through… Financial Times's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Financial Times shows bounded neutrality theater: some contested choices are softened through expertise, public-interest, professional, market, safety, or institutional language, but the record does not show dominant concealment of standpoint. That warrants a limited Ideological Disavowal penalty because the institution presents situated, contested choices as neutrality, expertise, inevitability, safety, or common sense. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Ideological Disavowal 0 to -3 recalibration: 0 for explicit standpoint or no penalty-level neutrality theater; -1 for bounded softening of contested choices; -2 for strong neutrality theater by a powerful institution; -3 for major gatekeeping or coercive power presented as neutral, necessary, objective, or non-ideological. Uncertainty This recalibration uses public self-presentation and profile evidence; later review should add direct language-analysis evidence for high-impact institutions. Linked evidence Financial Times's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Financial Times shows bounded neutrality theater: some contested choices are softened through expertise, public-interest, professional, market, safety, or institutional language, but the record does not show dominant concealment of standpoint. [12]

Bonus Credits

Bonus	Credit	Why this credit
Constitutional Spirit ? Credit for respecting constitutional rights and civil-liberties norms even where private law does not strictly require it.	1 / 3	Its publishing/news role provides durable public, reader, or author value beyond ordinary extraction. Its publishing/news role provides durable public, reader, or author value beyond ordinary extraction. That supports partial Constitutional Spirit credit because the institution respects speech, privacy, due process, conscience, or civil-liberties norms beyond bare legal compulsion. The value remains partial because the linked record does not show the practice as comprehensive, durable, or central enough for full credit. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Second-layer publishing/news pass; calibrated against major academic publishers, technical publishers, global news brands, magazines, and media conglomerates. Uncertainty Focused second-layer category pass; later review should add more labor, pricing, ownership, editorial, and user-data evidence. Linked evidence Financial Times receives constitutional spirit credit because its publishing/news role provides durable public, reader, or author value beyond ordinary extraction. [4]
Good Deal ? Credit for unusually fair value: durable quality, fair pricing, low lock-in, and clear customer surplus.	1 / 3	Its publishing/news role provides durable public, reader, or author value beyond ordinary extraction. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Second-layer publishing/news pass; calibrated against major academic publishers, technical publishers, global news brands, magazines, and media conglomerates. Uncertainty Focused second-layer category pass; later review should add more labor, pricing, ownership, editorial, and user-data evidence. Linked evidence Financial Times receives good deal credit because its publishing/news role provides durable public, reader, or author value beyond ordinary extraction. [5]
Cost Transparency ? Credit for clear posted prices, all-in fees, unit costs, public rate cards, margin/cost visibility, or surplus-allocation transparency, especially in markets where opaque quotes, hidden fees, or individualized pricing are normal.	1 / 3	Its publishing/news role provides durable public, reader, or author value beyond ordinary extraction. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Second-layer publishing/news pass; calibrated against major academic publishers, technical publishers, global news brands, magazines, and media conglomerates. Uncertainty Focused second-layer category pass; later review should add more labor, pricing, ownership, editorial, and user-data evidence. Linked evidence Financial Times receives cost transparency credit because its publishing/news role provides durable public, reader, or author value beyond ordinary extraction. [6]

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

Medium 72/100

12 verified linked claims 11 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 11/18 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 13/20

12 verified linked claims

Source quality 15/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 9/18

11 direct claims across 18 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 6/10

11/18 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending

VerificationUnverified

ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)

ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)

Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.

Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

1Financial Times is structured as private-company subsidiary, not as a worker-, reader-, author-, or public cooperative.

Ownership Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 8, 2026

AI scaffold

Financial TimesIndependent reporting · 82%
Nikkei FT acquisitionGeneral web source · 58%

2A global business newspaper and digital news organization owned by Nikkei.

Product Integrity Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 8, 2026

AI scaffold

Financial TimesIndependent reporting · 82%
Nikkei FT acquisitionGeneral web source · 58%

3The Financial Times has high information value and relatively serious journalism, but elite paywall economics and corporate ownership keep it mid-spectrum.

Calculation Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 8, 2026

AI scaffold

Financial TimesIndependent reporting · 82%
Nikkei FT acquisitionGeneral web source · 58%

4Financial Times receives constitutional spirit credit because its publishing/news role provides durable public, reader, or author value beyond ordinary extraction.

Constitutional Spirit Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 8, 2026

AI scaffold

Financial TimesIndependent reporting · 82%
Nikkei FT acquisitionGeneral web source · 58%

5Financial Times receives good deal credit because its publishing/news role provides durable public, reader, or author value beyond ordinary extraction.

Good Deal Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 8, 2026

AI scaffold

Financial TimesIndependent reporting · 82%
Nikkei FT acquisitionGeneral web source · 58%

6Financial Times receives cost transparency credit because its publishing/news role provides durable public, reader, or author value beyond ordinary extraction.

Cost Transparency Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 8, 2026

AI scaffold

Financial TimesIndependent reporting · 82%
Nikkei FT acquisitionGeneral web source · 58%

7Financial Times retains conduct relevant to the human harm penalty: the record shows a concrete concern on that axis in this sector.

Human Harm Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 8, 2026

AI scaffold

Financial TimesIndependent reporting · 82%
Nikkei FT acquisitionGeneral web source · 58%

8Financial Times retains conduct relevant to the ecological harm penalty: the record shows a concrete concern on that axis in this sector.

Ecological Harm Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 8, 2026

AI scaffold

Financial TimesIndependent reporting · 82%
Nikkei FT acquisitionGeneral web source · 58%

9Financial Times retains conduct relevant to the accountability-opacity penalty: the record shows a concrete concern on that axis in this sector.

Accountability Opacity Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 8, 2026

AI scaffold

Financial TimesIndependent reporting · 82%
Nikkei FT acquisitionGeneral web source · 58%

10Financial Times retains conduct relevant to the identity capture penalty: the record shows a concrete concern on that axis in this sector.

Identity Capture Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 8, 2026

AI scaffold

Financial TimesIndependent reporting · 82%
Nikkei FT acquisitionGeneral web source · 58%

11Financial Times retains conduct relevant to the surveillance capture penalty: the record shows a concrete concern on that axis in this sector.

Surveillance Capture Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 8, 2026

AI scaffold

Financial TimesIndependent reporting · 82%
Nikkei FT acquisitionGeneral web source · 58%

12Financial Times's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Financial Times shows bounded neutrality theater: some contested choices are softened through expertise, public-interest, professional, market, safety, or institutional language, but the record does not show dominant concealment of standpoint.

Ideological Disavowal Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 9, 2026

AI scaffold

Financial Times official siteIndependent reporting · 82%
Nikkei FT acquisitionGeneral web source · 58%

Alternatives

BQUALIFIED45 The Guardian trust-owned news organization · same market BQUALIFIED43 Associated Press nonprofit news cooperative · same market AGOOD56 Street Roots nonprofit street newspaper and resource guide · Oregon, Pacific Northwest AGOOD55 ProPublica nonprofit investigative newsroom · United States BQUALIFIED43 NPR nonprofit public-radio news network · United States

Competitors

BQUALIFIED45 The Guardian trust-owned news organization · same market BQUALIFIED43 Associated Press nonprofit news cooperative · same market CPERFORMATIVE40 BBC public-service broadcaster · same market DEXTRACTIVE34 Reuters global news agency · same market DEXTRACTIVE28 The Economist Group magazine and business-intelligence publisher · same market DEXTRACTIVE28 The New York Times Company public newspaper and digital subscription company · same market DEXTRACTIVE25 Bloomberg LP / Bloomberg News financial data and news company · same market DEXTRACTIVE25 Dow Jones / The Wall Street Journal business news and newspaper company · same market

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for Financial Times Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.

View Full Audit Log