Greenpeace USA is a nonprofit environmental advocacy organization rather than a shareholder-owned company. That places Greenpeace USA in the middle of Ownership: there is some mission, member, producer, or public-interest constraint, but decisive control is not fully democratic. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis.

Greenpeace USA publishes organizational and financial materials for a campaign nonprofit. That places Greenpeace USA in the middle of Governance: there are accountability mechanisms, but they stop short of broad democratic control. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis.

Greenpeace USA directs resources toward environmental campaigns and public mobilization rather than investor returns. That places Greenpeace USA high on Extraction: surplus is structurally routed toward workers, producers, users, or public benefit instead of being primarily captured upward. A still-higher or maximum value requires stronger proof that this structure is durable, broad, and not merely discretionary.

Greenpeace USA combines staff, supporters, and activists; participant agency is real but not equivalent to worker control. That places Greenpeace USA in the middle of Labor Sovereignty: workers or participants have some protection or agency, but not enough binding power to control the relationship. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis.

Greenpeace USA campaigns on climate, oceans, forests, democracy, and community harms that affect people beyond formal employment. That places Greenpeace USA high on Solidarity with the Unemployed: the institution materially supports people outside ordinary employment rather than treating exit as abandonment. A still-higher or maximum value requires stronger proof that this structure is durable, broad, and not merely discretionary.

Greenpeace USA takes on campaign, investigation, legal, and reputational costs to challenge powerful polluters. That places Greenpeace USA high on Loss-Bearing Fidelity: the institution is structured to absorb real costs rather than shifting losses onto weaker parties. A still-higher or maximum value requires stronger proof that this structure is durable, broad, and not merely discretionary.

Greenpeace USA is not a consumer-lock-in business model. That places Greenpeace USA high on Market Conduct: pricing, access, switching, and bargaining practices show restraint compared with ordinary rent-seeking competitors. A still-higher or maximum value requires stronger proof that this structure is durable, broad, and not merely discretionary.

Greenpeace USA core output is advocacy, investigation, and mobilization against ecological harm. That places Greenpeace USA high on Product Integrity: the core offering is genuinely useful and comparatively less dependent on traps, degradation, or harmful dependencies. A still-higher or maximum value requires stronger proof that this structure is durable, broad, and not merely discretionary.

Greenpeace USA scale increases campaign pressure but also increases movement-culture and identity-pressure risks. That places Greenpeace USA high on Scale Integrity: growth appears compatible with accountability, quality, and stakeholder benefit. A still-higher or maximum value requires stronger proof that this structure is durable, broad, and not merely discretionary.

Greenpeace USA the organization creates or protects dissent against concentrated institutional or industrial power. That supports partial Openness to Dissent credit because people can criticize, dissent, or challenge the institution without being managed into silence. The value remains partial because the linked record does not show the practice as comprehensive, durable, or central enough for full credit.

Greenpeace USA the organization uses rights, courts, public process, or civil-society advocacy to constrain stronger institutions. That supports full Constitutional Spirit credit because the institution respects speech, privacy, due process, conscience, or civil-liberties norms beyond bare legal compulsion. Full credit is reserved for unusually clear, profile-specific evidence rather than ordinary compliance language.

Greenpeace USA the organization publishes meaningful financial, annual-report, or accountability materials. That supports partial Cost Transparency credit because pricing, margins, fees, funding, or surplus allocation are made meaningfully legible. The value remains partial because the linked record does not show the practice as comprehensive, durable, or central enough for full credit.