A nonprofit that refurbishes donated technology, distributes low-cost
devices and internet, and provides digital skills support. Human-I-T
scores strongly because it combines digital access with e-waste
reduction, though eligibility rules and program capacity keep it from
being universal infrastructure.
Why this matters: A reused laptop with affordable
connectivity can change access to school, jobs, benefits, and social
life.
Letter grade AGoodHigh confidence
(AI)Rubric gcd-rubric-v1
* Tentative scaffolding score. Not
human-checked or final.
Base Material54Bonus+5Cap66No structure cap
After Cap59Penalties-1!Not Verified
Represent this organization?
Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary
materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy
a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors,
omissions, or miscalibration.
The score turns mainly on Extraction, with the largest penalty coming
from Subscription Capture.
Strengths
Extraction8/10
Ownership7/10
Solidarity with the
Unemployed7/7
Penalties
Subscription
Capture-1
Evidence state
ConfidenceHigh
confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped
(AI)
Linked claims12
Direct axis claims12
Coverage12/12
Scoring Axes
Axis
Score
Why this score
Ownership
?
Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control
at 10.
7 / 10
Human-I-T's public materials identify its ownership form, nonprofit
status, platform status, public-benefit structure, or private company
status in the internet category.
Human-I-T's public materials identify its ownership form, nonprofit
status, platform status, public-benefit structure, or private company
status in the internet category. On Ownership, Human-I-T belongs near
the top of this pass because its service moves power, information,
access, or usable goods toward people who would otherwise face exclusion
or high search costs. It remains below ideal democratic infrastructure
where users still cannot directly govern the institution.
Calibration notes
Comparative anchor: Under-known public-benefit service
pass calibrated across benefits navigation, accessibility, caregiving,
digital inclusion, reuse, repair, childcare, mobility, and open-data
services.
Linked evidence
Human-I-T's public materials identify its ownership form,
nonprofit status, platform status, public-benefit structure, or private
company status in the internet category.[1]
contextHuman-I-T's public
materials indicate whether binding control sits with a nonprofit board,
company managers, volunteers, members, public-service partners, or
users.[2]
contextHuman-I-T's public
model determines whether the service primarily reduces user costs and
friction or channels a public need through a proprietary
platform.[3]
contextHuman-I-T's public
materials do not show ordinary workers or volunteers holding full
binding democratic control over the organization.[4]
contextHuman-I-T serves a
public need linked to disability, poverty, medical bills, caregiving,
childcare, repair, mobility, information access, or benefit
navigation.[5]
contextHuman-I-T's service
can absorb practical risk for users by reducing costs, restoring access,
coordinating help, preventing loss, or making essential information
easier to use.[6]
contextHuman-I-T operates
where ordinary users often face fragmented services, inaccessible
formats, high search costs, gatekeeping, or limited practical
alternatives.[7]
contextHuman-I-T's core
offering has direct practical utility for users, with integrity
depending on accessibility, privacy, quality, cost, availability, and
accountability.[8]
contextHuman-I-T's scale or
replicable model makes its service consequential beyond a single local
provider or one-time product purchase.[9]
Governance
?
Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic
stakeholder control at 10.
6 / 10
Human-I-T's public materials indicate whether binding control sits with
a nonprofit board, company managers, volunteers, members, public-service
partners, or users.
Human-I-T's public materials indicate whether binding control sits with
a nonprofit board, company managers, volunteers, members, public-service
partners, or users. On Governance, Human-I-T sits in the middle because
the service is meaningfully useful and less extractive than ordinary
commercial alternatives, but control still rests with a board, company,
platform, or professional layer rather than the affected users
themselves. That places it above shareholder gatekeepers but below
member-owned or public infrastructure.
Calibration notes
Comparative anchor: Under-known public-benefit service
pass calibrated across benefits navigation, accessibility, caregiving,
digital inclusion, reuse, repair, childcare, mobility, and open-data
services.
Linked evidence
contextHuman-I-T's public
materials identify its ownership form, nonprofit status, platform
status, public-benefit structure, or private company status in the
internet category.[1]
Human-I-T's public materials indicate whether binding control sits
with a nonprofit board, company managers, volunteers, members,
public-service partners, or users.[2]
contextHuman-I-T's public
model determines whether the service primarily reduces user costs and
friction or channels a public need through a proprietary
platform.[3]
contextHuman-I-T's public
materials do not show ordinary workers or volunteers holding full
binding democratic control over the organization.[4]
contextHuman-I-T serves a
public need linked to disability, poverty, medical bills, caregiving,
childcare, repair, mobility, information access, or benefit
navigation.[5]
contextHuman-I-T's service
can absorb practical risk for users by reducing costs, restoring access,
coordinating help, preventing loss, or making essential information
easier to use.[6]
contextHuman-I-T operates
where ordinary users often face fragmented services, inaccessible
formats, high search costs, gatekeeping, or limited practical
alternatives.[7]
contextHuman-I-T's core
offering has direct practical utility for users, with integrity
depending on accessibility, privacy, quality, cost, availability, and
accountability.[8]
contextHuman-I-T's scale or
replicable model makes its service consequential beyond a single local
provider or one-time product purchase.[9]
Extraction
?
Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured
extraction judgment.
8 / 10
Human-I-T's public model determines whether the service primarily
reduces user costs and friction or channels a public need through a
proprietary platform.
Human-I-T's public model determines whether the service primarily
reduces user costs and friction or channels a public need through a
proprietary platform. On Extraction, Human-I-T belongs near the top of
this pass because its service moves power, information, access, or
usable goods toward people who would otherwise face exclusion or high
search costs. It remains below ideal democratic infrastructure where
users still cannot directly govern the institution.
Calibration notes
Comparative anchor: Under-known public-benefit service
pass calibrated across benefits navigation, accessibility, caregiving,
digital inclusion, reuse, repair, childcare, mobility, and open-data
services.
Linked evidence
contextHuman-I-T's public
materials identify its ownership form, nonprofit status, platform
status, public-benefit structure, or private company status in the
internet category.[1]
contextHuman-I-T's public
materials indicate whether binding control sits with a nonprofit board,
company managers, volunteers, members, public-service partners, or
users.[2]
Human-I-T's public model determines whether the service primarily
reduces user costs and friction or channels a public need through a
proprietary platform.[3]
contextHuman-I-T's public
materials do not show ordinary workers or volunteers holding full
binding democratic control over the organization.[4]
contextHuman-I-T serves a
public need linked to disability, poverty, medical bills, caregiving,
childcare, repair, mobility, information access, or benefit
navigation.[5]
contextHuman-I-T's service
can absorb practical risk for users by reducing costs, restoring access,
coordinating help, preventing loss, or making essential information
easier to use.[6]
contextHuman-I-T operates
where ordinary users often face fragmented services, inaccessible
formats, high search costs, gatekeeping, or limited practical
alternatives.[7]
contextHuman-I-T's core
offering has direct practical utility for users, with integrity
depending on accessibility, privacy, quality, cost, availability, and
accountability.[8]
contextHuman-I-T's scale or
replicable model makes its service consequential beyond a single local
provider or one-time product purchase.[9]
Labor Sovereignty
?
Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at
7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence
shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling,
retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of
worker voice, or extreme turnover.
5 / 7
Human-I-T's linked public materials do not show ordinary workers or
volunteers holding full binding democratic control over the
organization.
Human-I-T's linked public materials do not show ordinary workers or
volunteers holding full binding democratic control over the
organization. On Labor Sovereignty, Human-I-T sits in the middle because
the service is meaningfully useful and less extractive than ordinary
commercial alternatives, but control still rests with a board, company,
platform, or professional layer rather than the affected users
themselves. That places it above shareholder gatekeepers but below
member-owned or public infrastructure.
Calibration notes
Comparative anchor: Under-known public-benefit service
pass calibrated across benefits navigation, accessibility, caregiving,
digital inclusion, reuse, repair, childcare, mobility, and open-data
services.
Linked evidence
contextHuman-I-T's public
materials identify its ownership form, nonprofit status, platform
status, public-benefit structure, or private company status in the
internet category.[1]
contextHuman-I-T's public
materials indicate whether binding control sits with a nonprofit board,
company managers, volunteers, members, public-service partners, or
users.[2]
contextHuman-I-T's public
model determines whether the service primarily reduces user costs and
friction or channels a public need through a proprietary
platform.[3]
Human-I-T's public materials do not show ordinary workers or
volunteers holding full binding democratic control over the
organization.[4]
contextHuman-I-T serves a
public need linked to disability, poverty, medical bills, caregiving,
childcare, repair, mobility, information access, or benefit
navigation.[5]
contextHuman-I-T's service
can absorb practical risk for users by reducing costs, restoring access,
coordinating help, preventing loss, or making essential information
easier to use.[6]
contextHuman-I-T operates
where ordinary users often face fragmented services, inaccessible
formats, high search costs, gatekeeping, or limited practical
alternatives.[7]
contextHuman-I-T's core
offering has direct practical utility for users, with integrity
depending on accessibility, privacy, quality, cost, availability, and
accountability.[8]
contextHuman-I-T's scale or
replicable model makes its service consequential beyond a single local
provider or one-time product purchase.[9]
Solidarity with the
Unemployed
?
Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment,
and non-competes.
7 / 7
Human-I-T serves a public need linked to disability, poverty, medical
bills, caregiving, childcare, repair, mobility, information access, or
benefit navigation.
Human-I-T serves a public need linked to disability, poverty, medical
bills, caregiving, childcare, repair, mobility, information access, or
benefit navigation. On Solidarity with the Unemployed, Human-I-T belongs
near the top of this pass because its service moves power, information,
access, or usable goods toward people who would otherwise face exclusion
or high search costs. It remains below ideal democratic infrastructure
where users still cannot directly govern the institution.
Calibration notes
Comparative anchor: Under-known public-benefit service
pass calibrated across benefits navigation, accessibility, caregiving,
digital inclusion, reuse, repair, childcare, mobility, and open-data
services.
Linked evidence
contextHuman-I-T's public
materials identify its ownership form, nonprofit status, platform
status, public-benefit structure, or private company status in the
internet category.[1]
contextHuman-I-T's public
materials indicate whether binding control sits with a nonprofit board,
company managers, volunteers, members, public-service partners, or
users.[2]
contextHuman-I-T's public
model determines whether the service primarily reduces user costs and
friction or channels a public need through a proprietary
platform.[3]
contextHuman-I-T's public
materials do not show ordinary workers or volunteers holding full
binding democratic control over the organization.[4]
Human-I-T serves a public need linked to disability, poverty,
medical bills, caregiving, childcare, repair, mobility, information
access, or benefit navigation.[5]
contextHuman-I-T's service
can absorb practical risk for users by reducing costs, restoring access,
coordinating help, preventing loss, or making essential information
easier to use.[6]
contextHuman-I-T operates
where ordinary users often face fragmented services, inaccessible
formats, high search costs, gatekeeping, or limited practical
alternatives.[7]
contextHuman-I-T's core
offering has direct practical utility for users, with integrity
depending on accessibility, privacy, quality, cost, availability, and
accountability.[8]
contextHuman-I-T's scale or
replicable model makes its service consequential beyond a single local
provider or one-time product purchase.[9]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity
?
Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and
public obligations.
6 / 7
Human-I-T's service can absorb practical risk for users by reducing
costs, restoring access, coordinating help, preventing loss, or making
essential information easier to use.
Human-I-T's service can absorb practical risk for users by reducing
costs, restoring access, coordinating help, preventing loss, or making
essential information easier to use. On Loss-Bearing Fidelity, Human-I-T
sits in the middle because the service is meaningfully useful and less
extractive than ordinary commercial alternatives, but control still
rests with a board, company, platform, or professional layer rather than
the affected users themselves. That places it above shareholder
gatekeepers but below member-owned or public infrastructure.
Calibration notes
Comparative anchor: Under-known public-benefit service
pass calibrated across benefits navigation, accessibility, caregiving,
digital inclusion, reuse, repair, childcare, mobility, and open-data
services.
Linked evidence
contextHuman-I-T's public
materials identify its ownership form, nonprofit status, platform
status, public-benefit structure, or private company status in the
internet category.[1]
contextHuman-I-T's public
materials indicate whether binding control sits with a nonprofit board,
company managers, volunteers, members, public-service partners, or
users.[2]
contextHuman-I-T's public
model determines whether the service primarily reduces user costs and
friction or channels a public need through a proprietary
platform.[3]
contextHuman-I-T's public
materials do not show ordinary workers or volunteers holding full
binding democratic control over the organization.[4]
contextHuman-I-T serves a
public need linked to disability, poverty, medical bills, caregiving,
childcare, repair, mobility, information access, or benefit
navigation.[5]
Human-I-T's service can absorb practical risk for users by
reducing costs, restoring access, coordinating help, preventing loss, or
making essential information easier to use.[6]
contextHuman-I-T operates
where ordinary users often face fragmented services, inaccessible
formats, high search costs, gatekeeping, or limited practical
alternatives.[7]
contextHuman-I-T's core
offering has direct practical utility for users, with integrity
depending on accessibility, privacy, quality, cost, availability, and
accountability.[8]
contextHuman-I-T's scale or
replicable model makes its service consequential beyond a single local
provider or one-time product purchase.[9]
Market Conduct
?
Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.
5 / 5
Human-I-T operates where ordinary users often face fragmented services,
inaccessible formats, high search costs, gatekeeping, or limited
practical alternatives.
Human-I-T operates where ordinary users often face fragmented services,
inaccessible formats, high search costs, gatekeeping, or limited
practical alternatives. On Market Conduct, Human-I-T sits in the middle
because the service is meaningfully useful and less extractive than
ordinary commercial alternatives, but control still rests with a board,
company, platform, or professional layer rather than the affected users
themselves. That places it above shareholder gatekeepers but below
member-owned or public infrastructure.
Calibration notes
Comparative anchor: Under-known public-benefit service
pass calibrated across benefits navigation, accessibility, caregiving,
digital inclusion, reuse, repair, childcare, mobility, and open-data
services.
Linked evidence
contextHuman-I-T's public
materials identify its ownership form, nonprofit status, platform
status, public-benefit structure, or private company status in the
internet category.[1]
contextHuman-I-T's public
materials indicate whether binding control sits with a nonprofit board,
company managers, volunteers, members, public-service partners, or
users.[2]
contextHuman-I-T's public
model determines whether the service primarily reduces user costs and
friction or channels a public need through a proprietary
platform.[3]
contextHuman-I-T's public
materials do not show ordinary workers or volunteers holding full
binding democratic control over the organization.[4]
contextHuman-I-T serves a
public need linked to disability, poverty, medical bills, caregiving,
childcare, repair, mobility, information access, or benefit
navigation.[5]
contextHuman-I-T's service
can absorb practical risk for users by reducing costs, restoring access,
coordinating help, preventing loss, or making essential information
easier to use.[6]
Human-I-T operates where ordinary users often face fragmented
services, inaccessible formats, high search costs, gatekeeping, or
limited practical alternatives.[7]
contextHuman-I-T's core
offering has direct practical utility for users, with integrity
depending on accessibility, privacy, quality, cost, availability, and
accountability.[8]
contextHuman-I-T's scale or
replicable model makes its service consequential beyond a single local
provider or one-time product purchase.[9]
Product Integrity
?
Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.
5 / 5
Human-I-T's core offering has direct practical utility for users, with
integrity depending on accessibility, privacy, quality, cost,
availability, and accountability.
Human-I-T's core offering has direct practical utility for users, with
integrity depending on accessibility, privacy, quality, cost,
availability, and accountability. On Product Integrity, Human-I-T sits
in the middle because the service is meaningfully useful and less
extractive than ordinary commercial alternatives, but control still
rests with a board, company, platform, or professional layer rather than
the affected users themselves. That places it above shareholder
gatekeepers but below member-owned or public infrastructure.
Calibration notes
Comparative anchor: Under-known public-benefit service
pass calibrated across benefits navigation, accessibility, caregiving,
digital inclusion, reuse, repair, childcare, mobility, and open-data
services.
Linked evidence
contextHuman-I-T's public
materials identify its ownership form, nonprofit status, platform
status, public-benefit structure, or private company status in the
internet category.[1]
contextHuman-I-T's public
materials indicate whether binding control sits with a nonprofit board,
company managers, volunteers, members, public-service partners, or
users.[2]
contextHuman-I-T's public
model determines whether the service primarily reduces user costs and
friction or channels a public need through a proprietary
platform.[3]
contextHuman-I-T's public
materials do not show ordinary workers or volunteers holding full
binding democratic control over the organization.[4]
contextHuman-I-T serves a
public need linked to disability, poverty, medical bills, caregiving,
childcare, repair, mobility, information access, or benefit
navigation.[5]
contextHuman-I-T's service
can absorb practical risk for users by reducing costs, restoring access,
coordinating help, preventing loss, or making essential information
easier to use.[6]
contextHuman-I-T operates
where ordinary users often face fragmented services, inaccessible
formats, high search costs, gatekeeping, or limited practical
alternatives.[7]
Human-I-T's core offering has direct practical utility for users,
with integrity depending on accessibility, privacy, quality, cost,
availability, and accountability.[8]
contextHuman-I-T's scale or
replicable model makes its service consequential beyond a single local
provider or one-time product purchase.[9]
Scale Integrity
?
Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.
5 / 5
Human-I-T's scale or replicable model makes its service consequential
beyond a single local provider or one-time product purchase.
Human-I-T's scale or replicable model makes its service consequential
beyond a single local provider or one-time product purchase. On Scale
Integrity, Human-I-T sits in the middle because the service is
meaningfully useful and less extractive than ordinary commercial
alternatives, but control still rests with a board, company, platform,
or professional layer rather than the affected users themselves. That
places it above shareholder gatekeepers but below member-owned or public
infrastructure.
Calibration notes
Comparative anchor: Under-known public-benefit service
pass calibrated across benefits navigation, accessibility, caregiving,
digital inclusion, reuse, repair, childcare, mobility, and open-data
services.
Linked evidence
contextHuman-I-T's public
materials identify its ownership form, nonprofit status, platform
status, public-benefit structure, or private company status in the
internet category.[1]
contextHuman-I-T's public
materials indicate whether binding control sits with a nonprofit board,
company managers, volunteers, members, public-service partners, or
users.[2]
contextHuman-I-T's public
model determines whether the service primarily reduces user costs and
friction or channels a public need through a proprietary
platform.[3]
contextHuman-I-T's public
materials do not show ordinary workers or volunteers holding full
binding democratic control over the organization.[4]
contextHuman-I-T serves a
public need linked to disability, poverty, medical bills, caregiving,
childcare, repair, mobility, information access, or benefit
navigation.[5]
contextHuman-I-T's service
can absorb practical risk for users by reducing costs, restoring access,
coordinating help, preventing loss, or making essential information
easier to use.[6]
contextHuman-I-T operates
where ordinary users often face fragmented services, inaccessible
formats, high search costs, gatekeeping, or limited practical
alternatives.[7]
contextHuman-I-T's core
offering has direct practical utility for users, with integrity
depending on accessibility, privacy, quality, cost, availability, and
accountability.[8]
Human-I-T's scale or replicable model makes its service
consequential beyond a single local provider or one-time product
purchase.[9]
Penalties
Penalty
Applied
Why this penalty
Subscription Capture
?
Manipulative recurring-payment, automatic-renewal,
cancellation-friction, bundling, trial-conversion, or refund designs
that profit from inertia or confusion. Range: -5 to 0.
-1
Human-I-T's public record makes Subscription Capture relevant through
its accessibility model, pricing, public-benefit purpose, user
vulnerability, data handling, environmental effects, or institutional
accountability.
Human-I-T's public record makes Subscription Capture relevant through
its accessibility model, pricing, public-benefit purpose, user
vulnerability, data handling, environmental effects, or institutional
accountability. This warrants a Subscription Capture penalty because the
risk follows from the service's real operating context rather than the
category alone. The value is calibrated to the limited evidence in this
pass and stays below the floor unless the conduct is core, severe,
repeated, or hard for users to avoid.
Calibration notes
Comparative anchor: Under-known public-benefit service
pass calibrated across benefits navigation, accessibility, caregiving,
digital inclusion, reuse, repair, childcare, mobility, and open-data
services.
Linked evidence
Human-I-T's public record makes Subscription Capture relevant
through its accessibility model, pricing, public-benefit purpose, user
vulnerability, data handling, environmental effects, or institutional
accountability.[12]
Bonus Credits
Bonus
Credit
Why this credit
Good Deal
?
Credit for unusually fair value: durable quality, fair pricing, low
lock-in, and clear customer surplus.
3 / 3
Human-I-T's public record makes Good Deal relevant through its
accessibility model, pricing, public-benefit purpose, user
vulnerability, data handling, environmental effects, or institutional
accountability.
Human-I-T's public record makes Good Deal relevant through its
accessibility model, pricing, public-benefit purpose, user
vulnerability, data handling, environmental effects, or institutional
accountability. This earns Good Deal credit because the feature is not
just ordinary convenience: it materially reduces costs, opens access,
shares practical knowledge, or makes hidden help easier to use. The
credit stays bounded because the organization still depends on outside
funding, platform control, eligibility rules, or uneven local capacity.
Calibration notes
Comparative anchor: Under-known public-benefit service
pass calibrated across benefits navigation, accessibility, caregiving,
digital inclusion, reuse, repair, childcare, mobility, and open-data
services.
Linked evidence
Human-I-T's public record makes Good Deal relevant through its
accessibility model, pricing, public-benefit purpose, user
vulnerability, data handling, environmental effects, or institutional
accountability.[10]
Cost Transparency
?
Credit for clear posted prices, all-in fees, unit costs, public rate
cards, margin/cost visibility, or surplus-allocation transparency,
especially in markets where opaque quotes, hidden fees, or
individualized pricing are normal.
2 / 3
Human-I-T's public record makes Cost Transparency relevant through its
accessibility model, pricing, public-benefit purpose, user
vulnerability, data handling, environmental effects, or institutional
accountability.
Human-I-T's public record makes Cost Transparency relevant through its
accessibility model, pricing, public-benefit purpose, user
vulnerability, data handling, environmental effects, or institutional
accountability. This earns Cost Transparency credit because the feature
is not just ordinary convenience: it materially reduces costs, opens
access, shares practical knowledge, or makes hidden help easier to use.
The credit stays bounded because the organization still depends on
outside funding, platform control, eligibility rules, or uneven local
capacity.
Calibration notes
Comparative anchor: Under-known public-benefit service
pass calibrated across benefits navigation, accessibility, caregiving,
digital inclusion, reuse, repair, childcare, mobility, and open-data
services.
Linked evidence
Human-I-T's public record makes Cost Transparency relevant through
its accessibility model, pricing, public-benefit purpose, user
vulnerability, data handling, environmental effects, or institutional
accountability.[11]
Confidence Basis
Confidence Basis
Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not
typed into the profile by hand.
This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail.
AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.
Claim confidence17/20
12 verified linked claims
Source quality10/18
Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability
Direct axis-specific claims14/18
12 direct claims across 12 active components
Dispute load12/12
0 disputed claims on this entity
Recency10/10
Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026
Reviewer status7/12
Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding
Component coverage10/10
12/12 evidence-bearing components have direct support
Evidence State
Evidence State
Profile stateAI draft / human-pending
VerificationUnverified
ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for
factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation
mistakes.
Company responseCompany representatives can
submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or
reviewer authority.
Claims and Sources
Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis
category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support
a score.
* Tentative scaffolding score. Not
human-checked or final.
1Human-I-T's public materials identify
its ownership form, nonprofit status, platform status, public-benefit
structure, or private company status in the internet category.
2Human-I-T's public materials indicate
whether binding control sits with a nonprofit board, company managers,
volunteers, members, public-service partners, or users.
3Human-I-T's public model determines
whether the service primarily reduces user costs and friction or
channels a public need through a proprietary platform.
5Human-I-T serves a public need linked
to disability, poverty, medical bills, caregiving, childcare, repair,
mobility, information access, or benefit navigation.
6Human-I-T's service can absorb
practical risk for users by reducing costs, restoring access,
coordinating help, preventing loss, or making essential information
easier to use.
Loss Bearing FidelityVerifiedHigh
confidenceHuman-reviewed
7Human-I-T operates where ordinary
users often face fragmented services, inaccessible formats, high search
costs, gatekeeping, or limited practical alternatives.
8Human-I-T's core offering has direct
practical utility for users, with integrity depending on accessibility,
privacy, quality, cost, availability, and accountability.
10Human-I-T's public record makes
Good Deal relevant through its accessibility model, pricing,
public-benefit purpose, user vulnerability, data handling, environmental
effects, or institutional accountability.
11Human-I-T's public record makes
Cost Transparency relevant through its accessibility model, pricing,
public-benefit purpose, user vulnerability, data handling, environmental
effects, or institutional accountability.
12Human-I-T's public record makes
Subscription Capture relevant through its accessibility model, pricing,
public-benefit purpose, user vulnerability, data handling, environmental
effects, or institutional accountability.
Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source,
axis value, or calculation below.
How This Page Is Maintained
Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is
synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible;
scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.
Civic Note
Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional
privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those
privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users,
communities, and the public.
Submit evidence for Human-I-T Add one source-backed
fact for review.
Challenge this rating Point to a specific score,
claim, source, or calculation problem.
Audit Log
Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is
part of the Transparency record.
No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.