The Legal Aid Society is a nonprofit legal-services organization, provides evidence for the relevant scoring judgment compared with private legal-service markets. That places The Legal Aid Society in the middle of Ownership: there is some mission, member, producer, or public-interest constraint, but decisive control is not fully democratic. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis.

The Legal Aid Society is a nonprofit legal-services organization, provides evidence for the relevant scoring judgment compared with private legal-service markets. That places The Legal Aid Society in the middle of Governance: there are accountability mechanisms, but they stop short of broad democratic control. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis.

The Legal Aid Society is a nonprofit legal-services organization, provides evidence for the relevant scoring judgment compared with private legal-service markets. That places The Legal Aid Society high on Extraction: surplus is structurally routed toward workers, producers, users, or public benefit instead of being primarily captured upward. A still-higher or maximum value requires stronger proof that this structure is durable, broad, and not merely discretionary.

The Legal Aid Society is a nonprofit legal-services organization, provides evidence for the relevant scoring judgment compared with private legal-service markets. That places The Legal Aid Society in the middle of Labor Sovereignty: workers or participants have some protection or agency, but not enough binding power to control the relationship. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis.

The organization prioritizes legal help for people who otherwise lack power in courts and public systems, provides evidence for the relevant scoring judgment. That places The Legal Aid Society high on Solidarity with the Unemployed: the institution materially supports people outside ordinary employment rather than treating exit as abandonment. A still-higher or maximum value requires stronger proof that this structure is durable, broad, and not merely discretionary.

The Legal Aid Society is a nonprofit legal-services organization, provides evidence for the relevant scoring judgment compared with private legal-service markets. That places The Legal Aid Society high on Loss-Bearing Fidelity: the institution is structured to absorb real costs rather than shifting losses onto weaker parties. A still-higher or maximum value requires stronger proof that this structure is durable, broad, and not merely discretionary.

The Legal Aid Society is a nonprofit legal-services organization, provides evidence for the relevant scoring judgment compared with private legal-service markets. That places The Legal Aid Society high on Market Conduct: pricing, access, switching, and bargaining practices show restraint compared with ordinary rent-seeking competitors. A still-higher or maximum value requires stronger proof that this structure is durable, broad, and not merely discretionary.

The Legal Aid Society provides civil, criminal defense, and juvenile-rights legal services, supporting Product Integrity for ordinary and emergency legal needs. That places The Legal Aid Society high on Product Integrity: the core offering is genuinely useful and comparatively less dependent on traps, degradation, or harmful dependencies. A still-higher or maximum value requires stronger proof that this structure is durable, broad, and not merely discretionary.

The Legal Aid Society is a nonprofit legal-services organization, provides evidence for the relevant scoring judgment compared with private legal-service markets. That places The Legal Aid Society high on Scale Integrity: growth appears compatible with accountability, quality, and stakeholder benefit. A still-higher or maximum value requires stronger proof that this structure is durable, broad, and not merely discretionary.