nonprofit

Mozilla Foundation

A nonprofit and taxable-subsidiary ecosystem behind Firefox and open-web work, still useful as a public-interest browser alternative but weakened by search/ad revenue dependence, centralized governance, product bloat, sponsored surfaces, and trust failures. Mozilla Foundation remains weak because of person-dependent governance, material opacity, and surveillance capture, even where the product or service has practical value.

Why this matters: Mozilla is a crucial calibration case: nonprofit branding and open-web values deserve credit, but a public-interest browser can still become bureaucratic, revenue-dependent, and paternalistic toward users.

Letter grade D Extractive High confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1 Last reviewed May 8, 2026

Final Score 32* D - Extractive

DEXTRACTIVE32 pts

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material36

Bonus+4

Cap66No structure cap

After Cap40

Penalties-8

!Not Verified

Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Evaluation Overview

D - Extractive

The score turns mainly on Ownership, with the largest penalty coming from Reversibility.

Strengths

Ownership6/10
Governance5/10
Extraction5/10

Penalties

Reversibility-5
Accountability Opacity-2
Surveillance Capture-1

Evidence state

ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessExhaustive (AI)
Linked claims18
Direct axis claims17
Coverage15/15

Scoring Axes

Axis	Score	Why this score
Ownership ? Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.	6 / 10	Mozilla presents itself as a portfolio of Mozilla Foundation, Mozilla Corporation, Mozilla Ventures, Mozilla.ai, and MZLA, with Mozilla Foundation as sole owner of Mozilla Corporation; this… Mozilla presents itself as a portfolio of Mozilla Foundation, Mozilla Corporation, Mozilla Ventures, Mozilla.ai, and MZLA, with Mozilla Foundation as sole owner of Mozilla Corporation; this protects the mission from public shareholders but does not give Firefox users, workers, or contributors binding democratic control over. That places Mozilla Foundation in the middle of Ownership: there is some mission, member, producer, or public-interest constraint, but decisive control is not fully democratic. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Targeted Mozilla recalibration: compare against public-interest tech projects, search-funded browsers, ad-supported platforms, and open-source foundations. Linked evidence context Mozilla presents itself as a portfolio of Mozilla Foundation, Mozilla Corporation, Mozilla Ventures, Mozilla.ai, and MZLA, with Mozilla Foundation as sole owner of Mozilla Corporation; this protects the mission from public shareholders but does not give Firefox users, workers, or contributors binding democratic control over product and revenue decisions. [1] context Mozilla Foundation describes itself as a nonprofit organization working to keep the internet open and accessible. [2] Mozilla presents a portfolio in which Mozilla Foundation owns Mozilla Corporation and related entities, creating mission-oriented nonprofit ownership rather than user, worker, or public democratic ownership. [3]
Governance ? Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.	5 / 10	Mozilla presents itself as a portfolio of Mozilla Foundation, Mozilla Corporation, Mozilla Ventures, Mozilla.ai, and MZLA, with Mozilla Foundation as sole owner of Mozilla Corporation; this… Mozilla presents itself as a portfolio of Mozilla Foundation, Mozilla Corporation, Mozilla Ventures, Mozilla.ai, and MZLA, with Mozilla Foundation as sole owner of Mozilla Corporation; this protects the mission from public shareholders but does not give Firefox users, workers, or contributors binding democratic control over. That places Mozilla Foundation in the middle of Governance: there are accountability mechanisms, but they stop short of broad democratic control. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Targeted Mozilla recalibration: compare against public-interest tech projects, search-funded browsers, ad-supported platforms, and open-source foundations. Linked evidence Mozilla presents itself as a portfolio of Mozilla Foundation, Mozilla Corporation, Mozilla Ventures, Mozilla.ai, and MZLA, with Mozilla Foundation as sole owner of Mozilla Corporation; this protects the mission from public shareholders but does not give Firefox users, workers, or contributors binding democratic control over product and revenue decisions. [1] context TechCrunch reported and Mozilla confirmed that Mozilla Foundation laid off about 30% of employees in 2024, and that advocacy and global programs were no longer separate parts of the Foundation structure after reorganization. [4]
Extraction ? Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.	5 / 10	Mozilla reports that recent majority revenue has come from commercial search partnerships, and its 2023 audited financials report $494.874 million in royalties tied to default or optional… Mozilla reports that recent majority revenue has come from commercial search partnerships, and its 2023 audited financials report $494.874 million in royalties tied to default or optional search-engine placement, alongside New Tab/Tiles, Pocket Hits, and web advertising revenue formats. That places Mozilla Foundation in the middle of Extraction: the institution creates real value but still leaves room for rent extraction, unequal bargaining, or surplus capture. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Targeted Mozilla recalibration: compare against public-interest tech projects, search-funded browsers, ad-supported platforms, and open-source foundations. Linked evidence Mozilla reports that recent majority revenue has come from commercial search partnerships, and its 2023 audited financials report $494.874 million in royalties tied to default or optional search-engine placement, alongside New Tab/Tiles, Pocket Hits, and web advertising revenue formats. [5] context Firefox Suggest can show sponsored address-bar suggestions from partners, and Mozilla says it receives revenue when users engage with those sponsored suggestions. [6]
Labor Sovereignty ? Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.	4 / 7	Mozilla presents itself as a portfolio of Mozilla Foundation, Mozilla Corporation, Mozilla Ventures, Mozilla.ai, and MZLA, with Mozilla Foundation as sole owner of Mozilla Corporation; this… Mozilla presents itself as a portfolio of Mozilla Foundation, Mozilla Corporation, Mozilla Ventures, Mozilla.ai, and MZLA, with Mozilla Foundation as sole owner of Mozilla Corporation; this protects the mission from public shareholders but does not give Firefox users, workers, or contributors binding democratic control over. That places Mozilla Foundation in the middle of Labor Sovereignty: workers or participants have some protection or agency, but not enough binding power to control the relationship. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Targeted Mozilla recalibration: compare against public-interest tech projects, search-funded browsers, ad-supported platforms, and open-source foundations. Linked evidence context Mozilla presents itself as a portfolio of Mozilla Foundation, Mozilla Corporation, Mozilla Ventures, Mozilla.ai, and MZLA, with Mozilla Foundation as sole owner of Mozilla Corporation; this protects the mission from public shareholders but does not give Firefox users, workers, or contributors binding democratic control over product and revenue decisions. [1] context TechCrunch reported and Mozilla confirmed that Mozilla Foundation laid off about 30% of employees in 2024, and that advocacy and global programs were no longer separate parts of the Foundation structure after reorganization. [4] Mozilla's public materials describe foundation and corporation structures but do not show worker ownership or democratic labor control over Firefox, search partnerships, or product strategy. [7]
Solidarity with the Unemployed ? Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.	4 / 7	The linked record identifies Mozilla Foundation as a nonprofit organization working to keep the internet open and accessible. The linked record identifies Mozilla Foundation as a nonprofit organization working to keep the internet open and accessible. That places Mozilla Foundation in the middle of Solidarity with the Unemployed: some access, severance, retraining, openness, or mutual-aid value is present, but it is not central or durable. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Targeted Mozilla recalibration: compare against public-interest tech projects, search-funded browsers, ad-supported platforms, and open-source foundations. Linked evidence context Mozilla Foundation describes itself as a nonprofit organization working to keep the internet open and accessible. [2] context TechCrunch reported and Mozilla confirmed that Mozilla Foundation laid off about 30% of employees in 2024, and that advocacy and global programs were no longer separate parts of the Foundation structure after reorganization. [4] Mozilla's manifesto and foundation materials frame internet openness, privacy, and user control as public-benefit commitments, extending some value to people outside Mozilla's workforce and customers. [8]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity ? Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.	3 / 7	TechCrunch reported and Mozilla confirmed that Mozilla Foundation laid off about 30% of employees in 2024, and that advocacy and global programs were no longer separate parts of the Foundation structure after reorganization. TechCrunch reported and Mozilla confirmed that Mozilla Foundation laid off about 30% of employees in 2024, and that advocacy and global programs were no longer separate parts of the Foundation structure after reorganization. That places Mozilla Foundation in the middle of Loss-Bearing Fidelity: there is some willingness to preserve obligations, but the record still leaves meaningful risk-shifting concerns. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Targeted Mozilla recalibration: compare against public-interest tech projects, search-funded browsers, ad-supported platforms, and open-source foundations. Linked evidence TechCrunch reported and Mozilla confirmed that Mozilla Foundation laid off about 30% of employees in 2024, and that advocacy and global programs were no longer separate parts of the Foundation structure after reorganization. [4] context Mozilla reports that recent majority revenue has come from commercial search partnerships, and its 2023 audited financials report $494.874 million in royalties tied to default or optional search-engine placement, alongside New Tab/Tiles, Pocket Hits, and web advertising revenue formats. [5]
Market Conduct ? Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.	3 / 5	The linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Targeted Mozilla recalibration: compare against public-interest tech projects, search-funded browsers, ad-supported platforms, and open-source foundations. Linked evidence Firefox Suggest can show sponsored address-bar suggestions from partners, and Mozilla says it receives revenue when users engage with those sponsored suggestions. [6] context Mozilla reports that recent majority revenue has come from commercial search partnerships, and its 2023 audited financials report $494.874 million in royalties tied to default or optional search-engine placement, alongside New Tab/Tiles, Pocket Hits, and web advertising revenue formats. [5] context Firefox privacy disclosures say search suggestions can send real-time queries to search providers, U.S. Firefox Suggestions route query and interaction data through Mozilla systems using OHTTP, New Tab advertising uses technical and interaction data, and some ad data may be shared with advertising partners in aggregated or de-identified form. [9]
Product Integrity ? Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.	3 / 5	The Mozilla Manifesto states principles including internet openness, individual security, privacy, and public benefit. The Mozilla Manifesto states principles including internet openness, individual security, privacy, and public benefit. That places Mozilla Foundation in the middle of Product Integrity: the product has real use value but is compromised by incentives, monetization, lock-in, quality degradation, or risk. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Targeted Mozilla recalibration: compare against public-interest tech projects, search-funded browsers, ad-supported platforms, and open-source foundations. Linked evidence The Mozilla Manifesto states principles including internet openness, individual security, privacy, and public benefit. [10] context Firefox Suggest can show sponsored address-bar suggestions from partners, and Mozilla says it receives revenue when users engage with those sponsored suggestions. [6] Mozilla has added or exposed AI-enhanced Firefox features, including third-party chatbot access in the sidebar and AI controls for blocking current and future AI-enhanced features; Mozilla also says it is investing in generative-AI products and a broader AI-era portfolio. [11] Mozilla Bugzilla includes serious Firefox Session Restore defects involving tabs not being restored or being lost, including an open P2/S3 defect for overwritten session data and a 2025 regression where tab groups were not restored and users could lose relied-on session state. [12]
Scale Integrity ? Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.	3 / 5	Mozilla presents itself as a portfolio of Mozilla Foundation, Mozilla Corporation, Mozilla Ventures, Mozilla.ai, and MZLA, with Mozilla Foundation as sole owner of Mozilla Corporation; this… Mozilla presents itself as a portfolio of Mozilla Foundation, Mozilla Corporation, Mozilla Ventures, Mozilla.ai, and MZLA, with Mozilla Foundation as sole owner of Mozilla Corporation; this protects the mission from public shareholders but does not give Firefox users, workers, or contributors binding democratic control over. That places Mozilla Foundation in the middle of Scale Integrity: scale brings useful reach but also weakens accountability, transparency, or local constraint. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Targeted Mozilla recalibration: compare against public-interest tech projects, search-funded browsers, ad-supported platforms, and open-source foundations. Linked evidence context Mozilla presents itself as a portfolio of Mozilla Foundation, Mozilla Corporation, Mozilla Ventures, Mozilla.ai, and MZLA, with Mozilla Foundation as sole owner of Mozilla Corporation; this protects the mission from public shareholders but does not give Firefox users, workers, or contributors binding democratic control over product and revenue decisions. [1] context Mozilla reports that recent majority revenue has come from commercial search partnerships, and its 2023 audited financials report $494.874 million in royalties tied to default or optional search-engine placement, alongside New Tab/Tiles, Pocket Hits, and web advertising revenue formats. [5] context Mozilla has added or exposed AI-enhanced Firefox features, including third-party chatbot access in the sidebar and AI controls for blocking current and future AI-enhanced features; Mozilla also says it is investing in generative-AI products and a broader AI-era portfolio. [11] Mozilla's public-benefit internet role has meaningful scale, while State of Mozilla materials describe financing and search-partnership dependence that constrain how independently that scale can operate. [13]

Penalties

Penalty	Applied	Why this penalty
Reversibility ? Applied when positive conduct depends on current living leaders, founders, family owners, or other person-contingent governance rather than durable structure. Range: -5 to 0.	-5	Mozilla Foundation's favorable conduct depends partly on current leaders, founders, family owners, executive discretion, or other person-contingent control rather than a fully locked democratic stakeholder-control structure. Mozilla Foundation's favorable conduct depends partly on current leaders, founders, family owners, executive discretion, or other person-contingent control rather than a fully locked democratic stakeholder-control structure. That warrants a severe Reversibility penalty because favorable conduct depends on current people or discretionary leadership rather than locked stakeholder structure. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Targeted Mozilla recalibration: compare against public-interest tech projects, search-funded browsers, ad-supported platforms, and open-source foundations. Linked evidence Mozilla Foundation's favorable conduct depends partly on current leaders, founders, family owners, executive discretion, or other person-contingent control rather than a fully locked democratic stakeholder-control structure. [14] context Mozilla presents itself as a portfolio of Mozilla Foundation, Mozilla Corporation, Mozilla Ventures, Mozilla.ai, and MZLA, with Mozilla Foundation as sole owner of Mozilla Corporation; this protects the mission from public shareholders but does not give Firefox users, workers, or contributors binding democratic control over product and revenue decisions. [1] context Mozilla reports that recent majority revenue has come from commercial search partnerships, and its 2023 audited financials report $494.874 million in royalties tied to default or optional search-engine placement, alongside New Tab/Tiles, Pocket Hits, and web advertising revenue formats. [5]
Accountability Opacity ? Material opacity, reputation laundering, or hidden accountability structures that prevent public accountability. Range: -2 to 0.	-2	In 2025 Mozilla introduced Firefox Terms of Use language that prompted community concern about licensing of user input, then updated the language after acknowledging confusion and concern about the scope of Mozilla interaction with user data. In 2025 Mozilla introduced Firefox Terms of Use language that prompted community concern about licensing of user input, then updated the language after acknowledging confusion and concern about the scope of Mozilla interaction with user data. That warrants a severe Accountability Opacity penalty because material facts, risks, conflicts, ownership, or accountability information are obscured from the public. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Targeted Mozilla recalibration: compare against public-interest tech projects, search-funded browsers, ad-supported platforms, and open-source foundations. Linked evidence In 2025 Mozilla introduced Firefox Terms of Use language that prompted community concern about licensing of user input, then updated the language after acknowledging confusion and concern about the scope of Mozilla interaction with user data. [15] context Firefox privacy disclosures say search suggestions can send real-time queries to search providers, U.S. Firefox Suggestions route query and interaction data through Mozilla systems using OHTTP, New Tab advertising uses technical and interaction data, and some ad data may be shared with advertising partners in aggregated or de-identified form. [9]
Surveillance Capture ? Invasive surveillance, unreasonably non-optional tracking, facial recognition, biometric identification, or AI behavior scanning of customers, workers, bystanders, or the public. Range: -5 to 0.	-1	Firefox privacy disclosures say search suggestions can send real-time queries to search providers, U.S. Firefox Suggestions route query and interaction data through Mozilla systems using… Firefox privacy disclosures say search suggestions can send real-time queries to search providers, U.S. Firefox Suggestions route query and interaction data through Mozilla systems using OHTTP, New Tab advertising uses technical and interaction data, and some ad data may be shared with advertising partners in aggregated or. That warrants a limited Surveillance Capture penalty because customers, workers, users, bystanders, or the public are exposed to invasive tracking, biometrics, or behavior scanning. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Targeted Mozilla recalibration: compare against public-interest tech projects, search-funded browsers, ad-supported platforms, and open-source foundations. Linked evidence Firefox privacy disclosures say search suggestions can send real-time queries to search providers, U.S. Firefox Suggestions route query and interaction data through Mozilla systems using OHTTP, New Tab advertising uses technical and interaction data, and some ad data may be shared with advertising partners in aggregated or de-identified form. [9] context Firefox Suggest can show sponsored address-bar suggestions from partners, and Mozilla says it receives revenue when users engage with those sponsored suggestions. [6]

Bonus Credits

Bonus	Credit	Why this credit
Openness to Dissent ? Credit for tolerating internal, user, customer, worker, and public dissent without retaliation, capture, or viewpoint laundering.	1 / 3	Mozilla frames its work around an open and accessible internet, supporting user participation and resistance to closed-platform control. Mozilla frames its work around an open and accessible internet, supporting user participation and resistance to closed-platform control. That supports partial Openness to Dissent credit because people can criticize, dissent, or challenge the institution without being managed into silence. The value remains partial because the linked record does not show the practice as comprehensive, durable, or central enough for full credit. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Targeted Mozilla recalibration: compare against public-interest tech projects, search-funded browsers, ad-supported platforms, and open-source foundations. Linked evidence Mozilla frames its work around an open and accessible internet, supporting user participation and resistance to closed-platform control. [16] context Mozilla presents itself as a portfolio of Mozilla Foundation, Mozilla Corporation, Mozilla Ventures, Mozilla.ai, and MZLA, with Mozilla Foundation as sole owner of Mozilla Corporation; this protects the mission from public shareholders but does not give Firefox users, workers, or contributors binding democratic control over product and revenue decisions. [1]
Constitutional Spirit ? Credit for respecting constitutional rights and civil-liberties norms even where private law does not strictly require it.	2 / 3	The Mozilla Manifesto emphasizes openness, individual security, privacy, public benefit, and user control on the internet. The Mozilla Manifesto emphasizes openness, individual security, privacy, public benefit, and user control on the internet. That supports partial Constitutional Spirit credit because the institution respects speech, privacy, due process, conscience, or civil-liberties norms beyond bare legal compulsion. The value remains partial because the linked record does not show the practice as comprehensive, durable, or central enough for full credit. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Targeted Mozilla recalibration: compare against public-interest tech projects, search-funded browsers, ad-supported platforms, and open-source foundations. Linked evidence The Mozilla Manifesto emphasizes openness, individual security, privacy, public benefit, and user control on the internet. [17] context Firefox privacy disclosures say search suggestions can send real-time queries to search providers, U.S. Firefox Suggestions route query and interaction data through Mozilla systems using OHTTP, New Tab advertising uses technical and interaction data, and some ad data may be shared with advertising partners in aggregated or de-identified form. [9] context In 2025 Mozilla introduced Firefox Terms of Use language that prompted community concern about licensing of user input, then updated the language after acknowledging confusion and concern about the scope of Mozilla interaction with user data. [15]
Good Deal ? Credit for unusually fair value: durable quality, fair pricing, low lock-in, and clear customer surplus.	1 / 3	Mozilla’s public-benefit internet mission and free browser ecosystem create meaningful user value, tempered by revenue and governance complications. Mozilla’s public-benefit internet mission and free browser ecosystem create meaningful user value, tempered by revenue and governance complications. That supports partial Good Deal credit because ordinary users receive unusually fair value, durability, access, or surplus. The value remains partial because the linked record does not show the practice as comprehensive, durable, or central enough for full credit. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Targeted Mozilla recalibration: compare against public-interest tech projects, search-funded browsers, ad-supported platforms, and open-source foundations. Linked evidence Mozilla’s public-benefit internet mission and free browser ecosystem create meaningful user value, tempered by revenue and governance complications. [18] context Firefox Suggest can show sponsored address-bar suggestions from partners, and Mozilla says it receives revenue when users engage with those sponsored suggestions. [6] context Mozilla Bugzilla includes serious Firefox Session Restore defects involving tabs not being restored or being lost, including an open P2/S3 defect for overwritten session data and a 2025 regression where tab groups were not restored and users could lose relied-on session state. [12]

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

High 81/100

18 verified linked claims 17 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 15/15 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 17/20

18 verified linked claims

Source quality 11/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 14/18

17 direct claims across 15 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 10/10

15/15 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending

VerificationUnverified

ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)

ThoroughnessExhaustive (AI)

Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.

Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

1Mozilla presents itself as a portfolio of Mozilla Foundation, Mozilla Corporation, Mozilla Ventures, Mozilla.ai, and MZLA, with Mozilla Foundation as sole owner of Mozilla Corporation; this protects the mission from public shareholders but does not give Firefox users, workers, or contributors binding democratic control over product and revenue decisions.

Governance Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 8, 2026

AI scaffold

State of Mozilla 2024 - Financing an Open InternetGeneral web source · 58%
State of Mozilla 2024General web source · 58%

2Mozilla Foundation describes itself as a nonprofit organization working to keep the internet open and accessible.

Governance Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 5, 2026

AI scaffold

Mozilla Foundation - Who we areGeneral web source · 58%

3Mozilla presents a portfolio in which Mozilla Foundation owns Mozilla Corporation and related entities, creating mission-oriented nonprofit ownership rather than user, worker, or public democratic ownership.

Ownership Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 13, 2026

AI scaffold

Mozilla Foundation who we areGeneral web source · 58%
State of Mozilla 2024General web source · 58%

4TechCrunch reported and Mozilla confirmed that Mozilla Foundation laid off about 30% of employees in 2024, and that advocacy and global programs were no longer separate parts of the Foundation structure after reorganization.

Loss Bearing Fidelity Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 8, 2026

AI scaffold

TechCrunch: Mozilla Foundation lays off 30% staff, drops advocacy divisionGeneral web source · 58%
State of Mozilla 2024 - Financing an Open InternetGeneral web source · 58%

5Mozilla reports that recent majority revenue has come from commercial search partnerships, and its 2023 audited financials report $494.874 million in royalties tied to default or optional search-engine placement, alongside New Tab/Tiles, Pocket Hits, and web advertising revenue formats.

Extraction Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 8, 2026

AI scaffold

State of Mozilla 2024 - Financing an Open InternetGeneral web source · 58%
Mozilla Foundation and Subsidiaries 2023 Audited Financial StatementPrimary institutional record · 90%

6Firefox Suggest can show sponsored address-bar suggestions from partners, and Mozilla says it receives revenue when users engage with those sponsored suggestions.

Market Conduct Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 8, 2026

AI scaffold

Customize Firefox Suggest settingsGeneral web source · 58%
Get where you are going faster, with Firefox SuggestGeneral web source · 58%

7Mozilla's public materials describe foundation and corporation structures but do not show worker ownership or democratic labor control over Firefox, search partnerships, or product strategy.

Labor Sovereignty Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 13, 2026

AI scaffold

Mozilla Foundation who we areGeneral web source · 58%
State of Mozilla 2024General web source · 58%

8Mozilla's manifesto and foundation materials frame internet openness, privacy, and user control as public-benefit commitments, extending some value to people outside Mozilla's workforce and customers.

Solidarity Unemployed Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 13, 2026

AI scaffold

Mozilla ManifestoGeneral web source · 58%
Mozilla Foundation who we areGeneral web source · 58%

9Firefox privacy disclosures say search suggestions can send real-time queries to search providers, U.S. Firefox Suggestions route query and interaction data through Mozilla systems using OHTTP, New Tab advertising uses technical and interaction data, and some ad data may be shared with advertising partners in aggregated or de-identified form.

Surveillance Capture Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 8, 2026

AI scaffold

Firefox Privacy NoticeGeneral web source · 58%
How Firefox Protects Your DataGeneral web source · 58%

10The Mozilla Manifesto states principles including internet openness, individual security, privacy, and public benefit.

Product Integrity Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 5, 2026

AI scaffold

Mozilla ManifestoGeneral web source · 58%

11Mozilla has added or exposed AI-enhanced Firefox features, including third-party chatbot access in the sidebar and AI controls for blocking current and future AI-enhanced features; Mozilla also says it is investing in generative-AI products and a broader AI-era portfolio.

Product Integrity Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 8, 2026

AI scaffold

Access AI chatbots in FirefoxGeneral web source · 58%
How to turn off AI features in Firefox, or choose the ones you wantGeneral web source · 58%
State of Mozilla 2024 - Financing an Open InternetGeneral web source · 58%

12Mozilla Bugzilla includes serious Firefox Session Restore defects involving tabs not being restored or being lost, including an open P2/S3 defect for overwritten session data and a 2025 regression where tab groups were not restored and users could lose relied-on session state.

Product Integrity Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 8, 2026

AI scaffold

Bugzilla 1808407 - Session restore, Data lossGeneral web source · 58%
Bugzilla 1951319 - Session restore fails to restore tabs in groupsGeneral web source · 58%
Bugzilla 1946853 - Firefox closes all tabs without any reasonGeneral web source · 58%

13Mozilla's public-benefit internet role has meaningful scale, while State of Mozilla materials describe financing and search-partnership dependence that constrain how independently that scale can operate.

Scale Integrity Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 13, 2026

AI scaffold

State of Mozilla 2024General web source · 58%
Mozilla ManifestoGeneral web source · 58%

14Mozilla Foundation's favorable conduct depends partly on current leaders, founders, family owners, executive discretion, or other person-contingent control rather than a fully locked democratic stakeholder-control structure.

Reversibility Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 5, 2026

Mozilla Foundation - Who we areGeneral web source · 58%

15In 2025 Mozilla introduced Firefox Terms of Use language that prompted community concern about licensing of user input, then updated the language after acknowledging confusion and concern about the scope of Mozilla interaction with user data.

Accountability Opacity Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 8, 2026

AI scaffold

Mozilla: An update on our terms of useGeneral web source · 58%
TechCrunch: Mozilla rewrites Firefox Terms of Use after backlashGeneral web source · 58%
Mozilla: Introducing a terms of use and updated privacy notice for FirefoxGeneral web source · 58%

16Mozilla frames its work around an open and accessible internet, supporting user participation and resistance to closed-platform control.

Openness To Dissent Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 7, 2026

Mozilla Foundation who we areGeneral web source · 58%
Mozilla ManifestoGeneral web source · 58%

17The Mozilla Manifesto emphasizes openness, individual security, privacy, public benefit, and user control on the internet.

Constitutional Spirit Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 7, 2026

Mozilla ManifestoGeneral web source · 58%

18Mozilla’s public-benefit internet mission and free browser ecosystem create meaningful user value, tempered by revenue and governance complications.

Good Deal Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 7, 2026

Mozilla Foundation who we areGeneral web source · 58%
Mozilla ManifestoGeneral web source · 58%

Alternatives

Competitors

AGOOD66 Lemmy open-source federated forum software · same market AGOOD66 Mastodon nonprofit open-source social network project · same market AGOOD64 Python Software Foundation open-source nonprofit foundation · same market AGOOD63 GNOME Foundation membership-based free-software foundation · same market AGOOD63 Tor Project nonprofit privacy-technology project · same market AGOOD60 Electronic Frontier Foundation nonprofit digital-rights organization · same market AGOOD58 Software Freedom Conservancy free-software nonprofit fiscal sponsor · same market CPERFORMATIVE41 Linux Foundation nonprofit consortium · same market

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for Mozilla Foundation Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

May 8, 2026 at 12:00 AM UTC ai-scaffolding research-backed-score-recalibration

Deep Mozilla review added source-backed claims on governance, search/ad revenue dependence, sponsored suggestions, privacy/data processing, Terms of Use confusion, layoffs, AI/product sprawl, and session-restore reliability; recalibrated Mozilla from the prior over-generous A score.

May 6, 2026 at 12:00 AM UTC ai-scaffolding toxic-products-assessment

Added tentative AI-generated Toxic Products penalty 0 and directory value for current toxic, addictive, pesticide, livestock, chemical, or consumer-safety product exposure.

May 5, 2026 at 12:00 AM UTC ai-scaffolding ai-scaffolding-score

Added tentative AI-generated claim-backed score components for a previously listed under-review company or group.

View Full Audit Log