A nonprofit association representing and supporting community health
centers. NACHC scores well because it advocates for safety-net primary
care and community-health infrastructure rather than extracting from
patients, while trade-association limits and policy dependence keep it
below direct democratic care.
Why this matters: NACHC is an institutional support
layer for one of the better healthcare access models in the U.S.
Letter grade AGoodHigh confidence
(AI)Rubric gcd-rubric-v1
* Tentative scaffolding score. Not
human-checked or final.
Base Material49Bonus+3Cap66No structure cap
After Cap52Penalties-1!Not Verified
Represent this organization?
Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary
materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy
a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors,
omissions, or miscalibration.
The score turns mainly on Extraction, with the largest penalty coming
from Policy Capture.
Strengths
Extraction7/10
Solidarity with the
Unemployed7/7
Ownership6/10
Penalties
Policy
Capture-1
Evidence state
ConfidenceHigh
confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped
(AI)
Linked claims13
Direct axis claims13
Coverage13/13
Scoring Axes
Axis
Score
Why this score
Ownership
?
Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control
at 10.
6 / 10
National Association of Community Health Centers's public record
identifies its ownership form, institutional type, or
public/private/nonprofit/cooperative structure in the watchdogs
category.
National Association of Community Health Centers's public record
identifies its ownership form, institutional type, or
public/private/nonprofit/cooperative structure in the watchdogs
category. On Ownership, National Association of Community Health Centers
sits in the middle because the structure has real public, nonprofit, or
service value, but users still do not hold decisive control over prices,
access rules, quality, or institutional priorities. That places it above
ordinary shareholder firms but below democratic or member-owned
alternatives.
Calibration notes
Comparative anchor: Coverage-gap batch calibrated
across tax filing, utilities, housing, storage, healthcare systems, and
childcare/youth institutions.
Linked evidence
National Association of Community Health Centers's public record
identifies its ownership form, institutional type, or
public/private/nonprofit/cooperative structure in the watchdogs
category.[1]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers's public record indicates whether binding
control sits with shareholders, executives, members, public officials,
nonprofit boards, residents, patients, or customers.[2]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers's model determines whether money flows
primarily to investors and owners or back toward users, members, public
value, community services, affordability, or mission delivery.[3]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers's public materials do not show ordinary
workers holding full binding democratic control over the
institution.[4]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers operates in an everyday-need category where
job loss, illness, rent pressure, family-care obligations, tax
compliance, utility dependence, or household instability affects
bargaining power.[5]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers's product or service can absorb real
household, civic, care, housing, energy, or tax-compliance risk, but the
record also shows who bears costs when the institution fails or prices
rise.[6]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers operates in a market where customers,
tenants, patients, taxpayers, utility users, parents, or community
members often face switching costs, asymmetric information, or limited
choice.[7]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers's core service has practical everyday
utility, but its integrity depends on pricing, safety, transparency,
access, quality, data handling, and accountability.[8]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers's scale or category makes its decisions
consequential for ordinary U.S. households, patients, tenants, parents,
taxpayers, utility customers, or communities.[9]
Governance
?
Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic
stakeholder control at 10.
6 / 10
National Association of Community Health Centers's public record
indicates whether binding control sits with shareholders, executives,
members, public officials, nonprofit boards, residents, patients, or
customers.
National Association of Community Health Centers's public record
indicates whether binding control sits with shareholders, executives,
members, public officials, nonprofit boards, residents, patients, or
customers. On Governance, National Association of Community Health
Centers sits in the middle because the structure has real public,
nonprofit, or service value, but users still do not hold decisive
control over prices, access rules, quality, or institutional priorities.
That places it above ordinary shareholder firms but below democratic or
member-owned alternatives.
Calibration notes
Comparative anchor: Coverage-gap batch calibrated
across tax filing, utilities, housing, storage, healthcare systems, and
childcare/youth institutions.
Linked evidence
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers's public record identifies its ownership
form, institutional type, or public/private/nonprofit/cooperative
structure in the watchdogs category.[1]
National Association of Community Health Centers's public record
indicates whether binding control sits with shareholders, executives,
members, public officials, nonprofit boards, residents, patients, or
customers.[2]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers's model determines whether money flows
primarily to investors and owners or back toward users, members, public
value, community services, affordability, or mission delivery.[3]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers's public materials do not show ordinary
workers holding full binding democratic control over the
institution.[4]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers operates in an everyday-need category where
job loss, illness, rent pressure, family-care obligations, tax
compliance, utility dependence, or household instability affects
bargaining power.[5]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers's product or service can absorb real
household, civic, care, housing, energy, or tax-compliance risk, but the
record also shows who bears costs when the institution fails or prices
rise.[6]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers operates in a market where customers,
tenants, patients, taxpayers, utility users, parents, or community
members often face switching costs, asymmetric information, or limited
choice.[7]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers's core service has practical everyday
utility, but its integrity depends on pricing, safety, transparency,
access, quality, data handling, and accountability.[8]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers's scale or category makes its decisions
consequential for ordinary U.S. households, patients, tenants, parents,
taxpayers, utility customers, or communities.[9]
Extraction
?
Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured
extraction judgment.
7 / 10
National Association of Community Health Centers's model determines
whether money flows primarily to investors and owners or back toward
users, members, public value, community services, affordability, or
mission delivery.
National Association of Community Health Centers's model determines
whether money flows primarily to investors and owners or back toward
users, members, public value, community services, affordability, or
mission delivery. On Extraction, National Association of Community
Health Centers belongs near the top of this pass because its
cooperative, public, volunteer, or nonprofit structure moves power and
value closer to the people the service exists to help. It remains below
the strongest directory entries where scale, bureaucracy, local
variation, utility dependence, or public-program limits still constrain
user power.
Calibration notes
Comparative anchor: Coverage-gap batch calibrated
across tax filing, utilities, housing, storage, healthcare systems, and
childcare/youth institutions.
Linked evidence
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers's public record identifies its ownership
form, institutional type, or public/private/nonprofit/cooperative
structure in the watchdogs category.[1]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers's public record indicates whether binding
control sits with shareholders, executives, members, public officials,
nonprofit boards, residents, patients, or customers.[2]
National Association of Community Health Centers's model
determines whether money flows primarily to investors and owners or back
toward users, members, public value, community services, affordability,
or mission delivery.[3]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers's public materials do not show ordinary
workers holding full binding democratic control over the
institution.[4]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers operates in an everyday-need category where
job loss, illness, rent pressure, family-care obligations, tax
compliance, utility dependence, or household instability affects
bargaining power.[5]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers's product or service can absorb real
household, civic, care, housing, energy, or tax-compliance risk, but the
record also shows who bears costs when the institution fails or prices
rise.[6]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers operates in a market where customers,
tenants, patients, taxpayers, utility users, parents, or community
members often face switching costs, asymmetric information, or limited
choice.[7]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers's core service has practical everyday
utility, but its integrity depends on pricing, safety, transparency,
access, quality, data handling, and accountability.[8]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers's scale or category makes its decisions
consequential for ordinary U.S. households, patients, tenants, parents,
taxpayers, utility customers, or communities.[9]
Labor Sovereignty
?
Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at
7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence
shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling,
retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of
worker voice, or extreme turnover.
4 / 7
National Association of Community Health Centers's linked public
materials do not show ordinary workers holding full binding democratic
control over the institution.
National Association of Community Health Centers's linked public
materials do not show ordinary workers holding full binding democratic
control over the institution. On Labor Sovereignty, National Association
of Community Health Centers sits in the middle because the structure has
real public, nonprofit, or service value, but users still do not hold
decisive control over prices, access rules, quality, or institutional
priorities. That places it above ordinary shareholder firms but below
democratic or member-owned alternatives.
Calibration notes
Comparative anchor: Coverage-gap batch calibrated
across tax filing, utilities, housing, storage, healthcare systems, and
childcare/youth institutions.
Linked evidence
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers's public record identifies its ownership
form, institutional type, or public/private/nonprofit/cooperative
structure in the watchdogs category.[1]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers's public record indicates whether binding
control sits with shareholders, executives, members, public officials,
nonprofit boards, residents, patients, or customers.[2]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers's model determines whether money flows
primarily to investors and owners or back toward users, members, public
value, community services, affordability, or mission delivery.[3]
National Association of Community Health Centers's public
materials do not show ordinary workers holding full binding democratic
control over the institution.[4]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers operates in an everyday-need category where
job loss, illness, rent pressure, family-care obligations, tax
compliance, utility dependence, or household instability affects
bargaining power.[5]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers's product or service can absorb real
household, civic, care, housing, energy, or tax-compliance risk, but the
record also shows who bears costs when the institution fails or prices
rise.[6]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers operates in a market where customers,
tenants, patients, taxpayers, utility users, parents, or community
members often face switching costs, asymmetric information, or limited
choice.[7]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers's core service has practical everyday
utility, but its integrity depends on pricing, safety, transparency,
access, quality, data handling, and accountability.[8]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers's scale or category makes its decisions
consequential for ordinary U.S. households, patients, tenants, parents,
taxpayers, utility customers, or communities.[9]
Solidarity with the
Unemployed
?
Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment,
and non-competes.
7 / 7
National Association of Community Health Centers operates in an
everyday-need category where job loss, illness, rent pressure,
family-care obligations, tax compliance, utility dependence, or
household instability affects bargaining power.
National Association of Community Health Centers operates in an
everyday-need category where job loss, illness, rent pressure,
family-care obligations, tax compliance, utility dependence, or
household instability affects bargaining power. On Solidarity with the
Unemployed, National Association of Community Health Centers belongs
near the top of this pass because its cooperative, public, volunteer, or
nonprofit structure moves power and value closer to the people the
service exists to help. It remains below the strongest directory entries
where scale, bureaucracy, local variation, utility dependence, or
public-program limits still constrain user power.
Calibration notes
Comparative anchor: Coverage-gap batch calibrated
across tax filing, utilities, housing, storage, healthcare systems, and
childcare/youth institutions.
Linked evidence
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers's public record identifies its ownership
form, institutional type, or public/private/nonprofit/cooperative
structure in the watchdogs category.[1]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers's public record indicates whether binding
control sits with shareholders, executives, members, public officials,
nonprofit boards, residents, patients, or customers.[2]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers's model determines whether money flows
primarily to investors and owners or back toward users, members, public
value, community services, affordability, or mission delivery.[3]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers's public materials do not show ordinary
workers holding full binding democratic control over the
institution.[4]
National Association of Community Health Centers operates in an
everyday-need category where job loss, illness, rent pressure,
family-care obligations, tax compliance, utility dependence, or
household instability affects bargaining power.[5]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers's product or service can absorb real
household, civic, care, housing, energy, or tax-compliance risk, but the
record also shows who bears costs when the institution fails or prices
rise.[6]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers operates in a market where customers,
tenants, patients, taxpayers, utility users, parents, or community
members often face switching costs, asymmetric information, or limited
choice.[7]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers's core service has practical everyday
utility, but its integrity depends on pricing, safety, transparency,
access, quality, data handling, and accountability.[8]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers's scale or category makes its decisions
consequential for ordinary U.S. households, patients, tenants, parents,
taxpayers, utility customers, or communities.[9]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity
?
Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and
public obligations.
5 / 7
National Association of Community Health Centers's product or service
can absorb real household, civic, care, housing, energy, or
tax-compliance risk, but the record also shows who bears costs when the
institution fails or prices rise.
National Association of Community Health Centers's product or service
can absorb real household, civic, care, housing, energy, or
tax-compliance risk, but the record also shows who bears costs when the
institution fails or prices rise. On Loss-Bearing Fidelity, National
Association of Community Health Centers sits in the middle because the
structure has real public, nonprofit, or service value, but users still
do not hold decisive control over prices, access rules, quality, or
institutional priorities. That places it above ordinary shareholder
firms but below democratic or member-owned alternatives.
Calibration notes
Comparative anchor: Coverage-gap batch calibrated
across tax filing, utilities, housing, storage, healthcare systems, and
childcare/youth institutions.
Linked evidence
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers's public record identifies its ownership
form, institutional type, or public/private/nonprofit/cooperative
structure in the watchdogs category.[1]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers's public record indicates whether binding
control sits with shareholders, executives, members, public officials,
nonprofit boards, residents, patients, or customers.[2]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers's model determines whether money flows
primarily to investors and owners or back toward users, members, public
value, community services, affordability, or mission delivery.[3]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers's public materials do not show ordinary
workers holding full binding democratic control over the
institution.[4]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers operates in an everyday-need category where
job loss, illness, rent pressure, family-care obligations, tax
compliance, utility dependence, or household instability affects
bargaining power.[5]
National Association of Community Health Centers's product or
service can absorb real household, civic, care, housing, energy, or
tax-compliance risk, but the record also shows who bears costs when the
institution fails or prices rise.[6]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers operates in a market where customers,
tenants, patients, taxpayers, utility users, parents, or community
members often face switching costs, asymmetric information, or limited
choice.[7]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers's core service has practical everyday
utility, but its integrity depends on pricing, safety, transparency,
access, quality, data handling, and accountability.[8]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers's scale or category makes its decisions
consequential for ordinary U.S. households, patients, tenants, parents,
taxpayers, utility customers, or communities.[9]
Market Conduct
?
Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.
5 / 5
National Association of Community Health Centers operates in a market
where customers, tenants, patients, taxpayers, utility users, parents,
or community members often face switching costs, asymmetric information,
or limited choice.
National Association of Community Health Centers operates in a market
where customers, tenants, patients, taxpayers, utility users, parents,
or community members often face switching costs, asymmetric information,
or limited choice. On Market Conduct, National Association of Community
Health Centers sits in the middle because the structure has real public,
nonprofit, or service value, but users still do not hold decisive
control over prices, access rules, quality, or institutional priorities.
That places it above ordinary shareholder firms but below democratic or
member-owned alternatives.
Calibration notes
Comparative anchor: Coverage-gap batch calibrated
across tax filing, utilities, housing, storage, healthcare systems, and
childcare/youth institutions.
Linked evidence
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers's public record identifies its ownership
form, institutional type, or public/private/nonprofit/cooperative
structure in the watchdogs category.[1]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers's public record indicates whether binding
control sits with shareholders, executives, members, public officials,
nonprofit boards, residents, patients, or customers.[2]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers's model determines whether money flows
primarily to investors and owners or back toward users, members, public
value, community services, affordability, or mission delivery.[3]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers's public materials do not show ordinary
workers holding full binding democratic control over the
institution.[4]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers operates in an everyday-need category where
job loss, illness, rent pressure, family-care obligations, tax
compliance, utility dependence, or household instability affects
bargaining power.[5]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers's product or service can absorb real
household, civic, care, housing, energy, or tax-compliance risk, but the
record also shows who bears costs when the institution fails or prices
rise.[6]
National Association of Community Health Centers operates in a
market where customers, tenants, patients, taxpayers, utility users,
parents, or community members often face switching costs, asymmetric
information, or limited choice.[7]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers's core service has practical everyday
utility, but its integrity depends on pricing, safety, transparency,
access, quality, data handling, and accountability.[8]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers's scale or category makes its decisions
consequential for ordinary U.S. households, patients, tenants, parents,
taxpayers, utility customers, or communities.[9]
Product Integrity
?
Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.
5 / 5
National Association of Community Health Centers's core service has
practical everyday utility, but its integrity depends on pricing,
safety, transparency, access, quality, data handling, and
accountability.
National Association of Community Health Centers's core service has
practical everyday utility, but its integrity depends on pricing,
safety, transparency, access, quality, data handling, and
accountability. On Product Integrity, National Association of Community
Health Centers sits in the middle because the structure has real public,
nonprofit, or service value, but users still do not hold decisive
control over prices, access rules, quality, or institutional priorities.
That places it above ordinary shareholder firms but below democratic or
member-owned alternatives.
Calibration notes
Comparative anchor: Coverage-gap batch calibrated
across tax filing, utilities, housing, storage, healthcare systems, and
childcare/youth institutions.
Linked evidence
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers's public record identifies its ownership
form, institutional type, or public/private/nonprofit/cooperative
structure in the watchdogs category.[1]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers's public record indicates whether binding
control sits with shareholders, executives, members, public officials,
nonprofit boards, residents, patients, or customers.[2]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers's model determines whether money flows
primarily to investors and owners or back toward users, members, public
value, community services, affordability, or mission delivery.[3]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers's public materials do not show ordinary
workers holding full binding democratic control over the
institution.[4]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers operates in an everyday-need category where
job loss, illness, rent pressure, family-care obligations, tax
compliance, utility dependence, or household instability affects
bargaining power.[5]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers's product or service can absorb real
household, civic, care, housing, energy, or tax-compliance risk, but the
record also shows who bears costs when the institution fails or prices
rise.[6]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers operates in a market where customers,
tenants, patients, taxpayers, utility users, parents, or community
members often face switching costs, asymmetric information, or limited
choice.[7]
National Association of Community Health Centers's core service
has practical everyday utility, but its integrity depends on pricing,
safety, transparency, access, quality, data handling, and
accountability.[8]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers's scale or category makes its decisions
consequential for ordinary U.S. households, patients, tenants, parents,
taxpayers, utility customers, or communities.[9]
Scale Integrity
?
Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.
4 / 5
National Association of Community Health Centers's scale or category
makes its decisions consequential for ordinary U.S. households,
patients, tenants, parents, taxpayers, utility customers, or
communities.
National Association of Community Health Centers's scale or category
makes its decisions consequential for ordinary U.S. households,
patients, tenants, parents, taxpayers, utility customers, or
communities. On Scale Integrity, National Association of Community
Health Centers sits in the middle because the structure has real public,
nonprofit, or service value, but users still do not hold decisive
control over prices, access rules, quality, or institutional priorities.
That places it above ordinary shareholder firms but below democratic or
member-owned alternatives.
Calibration notes
Comparative anchor: Coverage-gap batch calibrated
across tax filing, utilities, housing, storage, healthcare systems, and
childcare/youth institutions.
Linked evidence
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers's public record identifies its ownership
form, institutional type, or public/private/nonprofit/cooperative
structure in the watchdogs category.[1]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers's public record indicates whether binding
control sits with shareholders, executives, members, public officials,
nonprofit boards, residents, patients, or customers.[2]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers's model determines whether money flows
primarily to investors and owners or back toward users, members, public
value, community services, affordability, or mission delivery.[3]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers's public materials do not show ordinary
workers holding full binding democratic control over the
institution.[4]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers operates in an everyday-need category where
job loss, illness, rent pressure, family-care obligations, tax
compliance, utility dependence, or household instability affects
bargaining power.[5]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers's product or service can absorb real
household, civic, care, housing, energy, or tax-compliance risk, but the
record also shows who bears costs when the institution fails or prices
rise.[6]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers operates in a market where customers,
tenants, patients, taxpayers, utility users, parents, or community
members often face switching costs, asymmetric information, or limited
choice.[7]
contextNational Association
of Community Health Centers's core service has practical everyday
utility, but its integrity depends on pricing, safety, transparency,
access, quality, data handling, and accountability.[8]
National Association of Community Health Centers's scale or
category makes its decisions consequential for ordinary U.S. households,
patients, tenants, parents, taxpayers, utility customers, or
communities.[9]
Penalties
Penalty
Applied
Why this penalty
Policy Capture
?
Private-interest attempts to bend law, regulation, subsidies, taxes,
enforcement, trade, labor, safety, competition, environmental,
healthcare, housing, surveillance, civil-liberties, or consumer policy
against workers, customers, citizens, affected communities, or
ecological life. Public-interest advocacy is not penalized merely
because it is lobbying. Range: -15 to 0.
-1
National Association of Community Health Centers's public record makes
Policy Capture relevant through its ownership, pricing, safety,
lobbying, environmental burden, youth exposure, data practices, lock-in,
public mission, or community accountability.
National Association of Community Health Centers's public record makes
Policy Capture relevant through its ownership, pricing, safety,
lobbying, environmental burden, youth exposure, data practices, lock-in,
public mission, or community accountability. This warrants a Policy
Capture penalty because the evidence shows harm or risk tied to the
institution's actual role: housing, tax, utility, healthcare, storage,
or childcare power over people with limited alternatives. The penalty is
calibrated to this entity's severity rather than assigned automatically
to the whole category.
Calibration notes
Comparative anchor: Coverage-gap batch calibrated
across tax filing, utilities, housing, storage, healthcare systems, and
childcare/youth institutions.
Linked evidence
National Association of Community Health Centers's public record
makes Policy Capture relevant through its ownership, pricing, safety,
lobbying, environmental burden, youth exposure, data practices, lock-in,
public mission, or community accountability.[13]
Bonus Credits
Bonus
Credit
Why this credit
Openness to Dissent
?
Credit for tolerating internal, user, customer, worker, and public
dissent without retaliation, capture, or viewpoint laundering.
1 / 3
National Association of Community Health Centers's public record makes
Openness to Dissent relevant through its ownership, pricing, safety,
lobbying, environmental burden, youth exposure, data practices, lock-in,
public mission, or community accountability.
National Association of Community Health Centers's public record makes
Openness to Dissent relevant through its ownership, pricing, safety,
lobbying, environmental burden, youth exposure, data practices, lock-in,
public mission, or community accountability. This earns limited Openness
to Dissent credit because the record shows a concrete public,
cooperative, affordability, access, transparency, or
community-accountability feature beyond ordinary market service. The
credit stays limited unless affected users can reliably exercise durable
power over the institution.
Calibration notes
Comparative anchor: Coverage-gap batch calibrated
across tax filing, utilities, housing, storage, healthcare systems, and
childcare/youth institutions.
Linked evidence
National Association of Community Health Centers's public record
makes Openness to Dissent relevant through its ownership, pricing,
safety, lobbying, environmental burden, youth exposure, data practices,
lock-in, public mission, or community accountability.[10]
Constitutional Spirit
?
Credit for respecting constitutional rights and civil-liberties norms
even where private law does not strictly require it.
1 / 3
National Association of Community Health Centers's public record makes
Constitutional Spirit relevant through its ownership, pricing, safety,
lobbying, environmental burden, youth exposure, data practices, lock-in,
public mission, or community accountability.
National Association of Community Health Centers's public record makes
Constitutional Spirit relevant through its ownership, pricing, safety,
lobbying, environmental burden, youth exposure, data practices, lock-in,
public mission, or community accountability. This earns limited
Constitutional Spirit credit because the record shows a concrete public,
cooperative, affordability, access, transparency, or
community-accountability feature beyond ordinary market service. The
credit stays limited unless affected users can reliably exercise durable
power over the institution.
Calibration notes
Comparative anchor: Coverage-gap batch calibrated
across tax filing, utilities, housing, storage, healthcare systems, and
childcare/youth institutions.
Linked evidence
National Association of Community Health Centers's public record
makes Constitutional Spirit relevant through its ownership, pricing,
safety, lobbying, environmental burden, youth exposure, data practices,
lock-in, public mission, or community accountability.[11]
Good Deal
?
Credit for unusually fair value: durable quality, fair pricing, low
lock-in, and clear customer surplus.
1 / 3
National Association of Community Health Centers's public record makes
Good Deal relevant through its ownership, pricing, safety, lobbying,
environmental burden, youth exposure, data practices, lock-in, public
mission, or community accountability.
National Association of Community Health Centers's public record makes
Good Deal relevant through its ownership, pricing, safety, lobbying,
environmental burden, youth exposure, data practices, lock-in, public
mission, or community accountability. This earns limited Good Deal
credit because the record shows a concrete public, cooperative,
affordability, access, transparency, or community-accountability feature
beyond ordinary market service. The credit stays limited unless affected
users can reliably exercise durable power over the institution.
Calibration notes
Comparative anchor: Coverage-gap batch calibrated
across tax filing, utilities, housing, storage, healthcare systems, and
childcare/youth institutions.
Linked evidence
National Association of Community Health Centers's public record
makes Good Deal relevant through its ownership, pricing, safety,
lobbying, environmental burden, youth exposure, data practices, lock-in,
public mission, or community accountability.[12]
Confidence Basis
Confidence Basis
Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not
typed into the profile by hand.
This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail.
AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.
Claim confidence17/20
13 verified linked claims
Source quality10/18
Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability
Direct axis-specific claims14/18
13 direct claims across 13 active components
Dispute load12/12
0 disputed claims on this entity
Recency10/10
Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026
Reviewer status7/12
Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding
Component coverage10/10
13/13 evidence-bearing components have direct support
Evidence State
Evidence State
Profile stateAI draft / human-pending
VerificationUnverified
ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for
factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation
mistakes.
Company responseCompany representatives can
submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or
reviewer authority.
Claims and Sources
Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis
category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support
a score.
* Tentative scaffolding score. Not
human-checked or final.
1National Association of Community
Health Centers's public record identifies its ownership form,
institutional type, or public/private/nonprofit/cooperative structure in
the watchdogs category.
2National Association of Community
Health Centers's public record indicates whether binding control sits
with shareholders, executives, members, public officials, nonprofit
boards, residents, patients, or customers.
3National Association of Community
Health Centers's model determines whether money flows primarily to
investors and owners or back toward users, members, public value,
community services, affordability, or mission delivery.
4National Association of Community
Health Centers's public materials do not show ordinary workers holding
full binding democratic control over the institution.
5National Association of Community
Health Centers operates in an everyday-need category where job loss,
illness, rent pressure, family-care obligations, tax compliance, utility
dependence, or household instability affects bargaining power.
6National Association of Community
Health Centers's product or service can absorb real household, civic,
care, housing, energy, or tax-compliance risk, but the record also shows
who bears costs when the institution fails or prices rise.
Loss Bearing FidelityVerifiedHigh
confidenceHuman-reviewed
7National Association of Community
Health Centers operates in a market where customers, tenants, patients,
taxpayers, utility users, parents, or community members often face
switching costs, asymmetric information, or limited choice.
8National Association of Community
Health Centers's core service has practical everyday utility, but its
integrity depends on pricing, safety, transparency, access, quality,
data handling, and accountability.
9National Association of Community
Health Centers's scale or category makes its decisions consequential for
ordinary U.S. households, patients, tenants, parents, taxpayers, utility
customers, or communities.
10National Association of Community
Health Centers's public record makes Openness to Dissent relevant
through its ownership, pricing, safety, lobbying, environmental burden,
youth exposure, data practices, lock-in, public mission, or community
accountability.
Openness To DissentVerifiedMedium
confidenceHuman-reviewed
11National Association of Community
Health Centers's public record makes Constitutional Spirit relevant
through its ownership, pricing, safety, lobbying, environmental burden,
youth exposure, data practices, lock-in, public mission, or community
accountability.
12National Association of Community
Health Centers's public record makes Good Deal relevant through its
ownership, pricing, safety, lobbying, environmental burden, youth
exposure, data practices, lock-in, public mission, or community
accountability.
13National Association of Community
Health Centers's public record makes Policy Capture relevant through its
ownership, pricing, safety, lobbying, environmental burden, youth
exposure, data practices, lock-in, public mission, or community
accountability.
Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source,
axis value, or calculation below.
How This Page Is Maintained
Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is
synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible;
scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.
Civic Note
Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional
privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those
privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users,
communities, and the public.
Submit evidence for National Association of Community Health
Centers Add one source-backed fact for review.
Challenge this rating Point to a specific score,
claim, source, or calculation problem.
Audit Log
Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is
part of the Transparency record.
No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.