nonprofit advocacy organization

National Alliance on Mental Illness

A large mental-health advocacy nonprofit that provides education, support, and policy advocacy while formally supporting involuntary civil commitment as a last-resort intervention. National Alliance on Mental Illness remains weak because of documented human harm, person-dependent governance, and coercive violence, even where the product or service has practical value.

Why this matters: NAMI is a calibration case for benevolent family-and-peer advocacy that still accepts nonconsensual psychiatric authority in some cases.

Letter grade D Extractive Medium confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1 Last reviewed May 7, 2026

Final Score 24* D - Extractive

DEXTRACTIVE24 pts

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material36

Bonus+4

Cap66No structure cap

After Cap40

Penalties-16

!Not Verified

Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Evaluation Overview

D - Extractive

The score turns mainly on Ownership, with the largest penalty coming from Reversibility.

Strengths

Ownership5/10
Extraction5/10
Governance4/10

Penalties

Reversibility-5
Human Harm-5
Coercive Violence-4
Identity Capture-1

Evidence state

ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Linked claims9
Direct axis claims9
Coverage9/17

Scoring Axes

Axis	Score	Why this score
Ownership ? Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.	5 / 10	NAMI provides support, education, helplines, advocacy, and policy resources for people and families affected by mental illness. NAMI provides support, education, helplines, advocacy, and policy resources for people and families affected by mental illness. That places National Alliance on Mental Illness in the middle of Ownership: there is some mission, member, producer, or public-interest constraint, but decisive control is not fully democratic. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 118 scored entries below, 6 tied, 102 above on Ownership. Linked evidence context NAMI provides support, education, helplines, advocacy, and policy resources for people and families affected by mental illness. [1] context NAMI says people should usually make their own treatment decisions but supports involuntary civil commitment as a last resort when voluntary engagement is not possible and the intervention is believed to be in the individual’s best interests. [2] context NAMI describes involuntary civil commitment as court-ordered inpatient or supervised outpatient psychiatric treatment without the individual’s consent, while acknowledging that involuntary commitment does not produce positive results for everyone. [3]
Governance ? Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.	4 / 10	NAMI provides support, education, helplines, advocacy, and policy resources for people and families affected by mental illness. NAMI provides support, education, helplines, advocacy, and policy resources for people and families affected by mental illness. That places National Alliance on Mental Illness in the middle of Governance: there are accountability mechanisms, but they stop short of broad democratic control. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 108 scored entries below, 18 tied, 100 above on Governance. Linked evidence context NAMI provides support, education, helplines, advocacy, and policy resources for people and families affected by mental illness. [1] context NAMI says people should usually make their own treatment decisions but supports involuntary civil commitment as a last resort when voluntary engagement is not possible and the intervention is believed to be in the individual’s best interests. [2] context NAMI describes involuntary civil commitment as court-ordered inpatient or supervised outpatient psychiatric treatment without the individual’s consent, while acknowledging that involuntary commitment does not produce positive results for everyone. [3]
Extraction ? Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.	5 / 10	NAMI provides support, education, helplines, advocacy, and policy resources for people and families affected by mental illness. NAMI provides support, education, helplines, advocacy, and policy resources for people and families affected by mental illness. That places National Alliance on Mental Illness in the middle of Extraction: the institution creates real value but still leaves room for rent extraction, unequal bargaining, or surplus capture. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 95 scored entries below, 19 tied, 112 above on Extraction. Linked evidence context NAMI provides support, education, helplines, advocacy, and policy resources for people and families affected by mental illness. [1] context NAMI says people should usually make their own treatment decisions but supports involuntary civil commitment as a last resort when voluntary engagement is not possible and the intervention is believed to be in the individual’s best interests. [2] context NAMI describes involuntary civil commitment as court-ordered inpatient or supervised outpatient psychiatric treatment without the individual’s consent, while acknowledging that involuntary commitment does not produce positive results for everyone. [3]
Labor Sovereignty ? Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.	3 / 7	NAMI provides support, education, helplines, advocacy, and policy resources for people and families affected by mental illness. NAMI provides support, education, helplines, advocacy, and policy resources for people and families affected by mental illness. That places National Alliance on Mental Illness in the middle of Labor Sovereignty: workers or participants have some protection or agency, but not enough binding power to control the relationship. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 45 scored entries below, 66 tied, 115 above on Labor Sovereignty. Linked evidence context NAMI provides support, education, helplines, advocacy, and policy resources for people and families affected by mental illness. [1] context NAMI says people should usually make their own treatment decisions but supports involuntary civil commitment as a last resort when voluntary engagement is not possible and the intervention is believed to be in the individual’s best interests. [2] context NAMI describes involuntary civil commitment as court-ordered inpatient or supervised outpatient psychiatric treatment without the individual’s consent, while acknowledging that involuntary commitment does not produce positive results for everyone. [3]
Solidarity with the Unemployed ? Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.	4 / 7	NAMI provides support, education, helplines, advocacy, and policy resources for people and families affected by mental illness. NAMI provides support, education, helplines, advocacy, and policy resources for people and families affected by mental illness. That places National Alliance on Mental Illness in the middle of Solidarity with the Unemployed: some access, severance, retraining, openness, or mutual-aid value is present, but it is not central or durable. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 127 scored entries below, 30 tied, 69 above on Solidarity with the Unemployed. Linked evidence context NAMI provides support, education, helplines, advocacy, and policy resources for people and families affected by mental illness. [1] context NAMI says people should usually make their own treatment decisions but supports involuntary civil commitment as a last resort when voluntary engagement is not possible and the intervention is believed to be in the individual’s best interests. [2] context NAMI describes involuntary civil commitment as court-ordered inpatient or supervised outpatient psychiatric treatment without the individual’s consent, while acknowledging that involuntary commitment does not produce positive results for everyone. [3]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity ? Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.	4 / 7	NAMI provides support, education, helplines, advocacy, and policy resources for people and families affected by mental illness. NAMI provides support, education, helplines, advocacy, and policy resources for people and families affected by mental illness. That places National Alliance on Mental Illness in the middle of Loss-Bearing Fidelity: there is some willingness to preserve obligations, but the record still leaves meaningful risk-shifting concerns. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 88 scored entries below, 30 tied, 108 above on Loss-Bearing Fidelity. Linked evidence context NAMI provides support, education, helplines, advocacy, and policy resources for people and families affected by mental illness. [1] context NAMI says people should usually make their own treatment decisions but supports involuntary civil commitment as a last resort when voluntary engagement is not possible and the intervention is believed to be in the individual’s best interests. [2] context NAMI describes involuntary civil commitment as court-ordered inpatient or supervised outpatient psychiatric treatment without the individual’s consent, while acknowledging that involuntary commitment does not produce positive results for everyone. [3]
Market Conduct ? Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.	4 / 5	NAMI provides support, education, helplines, advocacy, and policy resources for people and families affected by mental illness. NAMI provides support, education, helplines, advocacy, and policy resources for people and families affected by mental illness. That places National Alliance on Mental Illness high on Market Conduct: pricing, access, switching, and bargaining practices show restraint compared with ordinary rent-seeking competitors. A still-higher or maximum value requires stronger proof that this structure is durable, broad, and not merely discretionary. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 106 scored entries below, 73 tied, 47 above on Market Conduct. Linked evidence context NAMI provides support, education, helplines, advocacy, and policy resources for people and families affected by mental illness. [1] context NAMI says people should usually make their own treatment decisions but supports involuntary civil commitment as a last resort when voluntary engagement is not possible and the intervention is believed to be in the individual’s best interests. [2] context NAMI describes involuntary civil commitment as court-ordered inpatient or supervised outpatient psychiatric treatment without the individual’s consent, while acknowledging that involuntary commitment does not produce positive results for everyone. [3]
Product Integrity ? Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.	3 / 5	NAMI provides support, education, helplines, advocacy, and policy resources for people and families affected by mental illness. NAMI provides support, education, helplines, advocacy, and policy resources for people and families affected by mental illness. That places National Alliance on Mental Illness in the middle of Product Integrity: the product has real use value but is compromised by incentives, monetization, lock-in, quality degradation, or risk. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 37 scored entries below, 23 tied, 166 above on Product Integrity. Uncertainty Priority page: add more axis-specific research over time to make the comparative placement harder to dispute. Linked evidence NAMI provides support, education, helplines, advocacy, and policy resources for people and families affected by mental illness. [1] context NAMI says people should usually make their own treatment decisions but supports involuntary civil commitment as a last resort when voluntary engagement is not possible and the intervention is believed to be in the individual’s best interests. [2] context NAMI describes involuntary civil commitment as court-ordered inpatient or supervised outpatient psychiatric treatment without the individual’s consent, while acknowledging that involuntary commitment does not produce positive results for everyone. [3]
Scale Integrity ? Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.	4 / 5	NAMI provides support, education, helplines, advocacy, and policy resources for people and families affected by mental illness. NAMI provides support, education, helplines, advocacy, and policy resources for people and families affected by mental illness. That places National Alliance on Mental Illness high on Scale Integrity: growth appears compatible with accountability, quality, and stakeholder benefit. A still-higher or maximum value requires stronger proof that this structure is durable, broad, and not merely discretionary. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 109 scored entries below, 81 tied, 36 above on Scale Integrity. Linked evidence context NAMI provides support, education, helplines, advocacy, and policy resources for people and families affected by mental illness. [1] context NAMI says people should usually make their own treatment decisions but supports involuntary civil commitment as a last resort when voluntary engagement is not possible and the intervention is believed to be in the individual’s best interests. [2] context NAMI describes involuntary civil commitment as court-ordered inpatient or supervised outpatient psychiatric treatment without the individual’s consent, while acknowledging that involuntary commitment does not produce positive results for everyone. [3]

Penalties

Penalty	Applied	Why this penalty
Reversibility ? Applied when positive conduct depends on current living leaders, founders, family owners, or other person-contingent governance rather than durable structure. Range: -5 to 0.	-5	NAMI offers public support and advocacy value, but its policy stance is nonprofit-board governed and not structurally locked by the affected people most exposed to coercive treatment. NAMI offers public support and advocacy value, but its policy stance is nonprofit-board governed and not structurally locked by the affected people most exposed to coercive treatment. That warrants a severe Reversibility penalty because favorable conduct depends on current people or discretionary leadership rather than locked stakeholder structure. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 0 scored entries below, 95 tied, 131 above on Reversibility. Linked evidence NAMI offers public support and advocacy value, but its policy stance is nonprofit-board governed and not structurally locked by the affected people most exposed to coercive treatment. [7]
Human Harm ? Severity, scale, culpability, vulnerable targets, willful reoffense, reputation laundering, pattern escalation, and time decay. Range: -20 to 0.	-5	NAMI describes involuntary civil commitment as court-ordered inpatient or supervised outpatient psychiatric treatment without the individual’s consent, while acknowledging that involuntary commitment does not produce positive results for everyone. NAMI describes involuntary civil commitment as court-ordered inpatient or supervised outpatient psychiatric treatment without the individual’s consent, while acknowledging that involuntary commitment does not produce positive results for everyone. That warrants a limited Human Harm penalty because ordinary operation, documented misconduct, or institutional power creates serious injury, deprivation, abuse, or foreseeable human damage. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 41 scored entries below, 6 tied, 179 above on Human Harm. Linked evidence NAMI describes involuntary civil commitment as court-ordered inpatient or supervised outpatient psychiatric treatment without the individual’s consent, while acknowledging that involuntary commitment does not produce positive results for everyone. [3]
Coercive Violence ? Direct or institutionally enabled killing, torture, detention abuse, armed repression, forced displacement, violent domination, or nonconsensual crisis-line emergency escalation that exposes callers to confinement or force. Range: -30 to 0.	-4	NAMI says people should usually make their own treatment decisions but supports involuntary civil commitment as a last resort when voluntary engagement is not possible and the intervention is believed to be in the individual’s best interests. NAMI says people should usually make their own treatment decisions but supports involuntary civil commitment as a last resort when voluntary engagement is not possible and the intervention is believed to be in the individual’s best interests. That warrants a limited Coercive Violence penalty because the institution uses, enables, profits from, or materially supports violent domination, detention abuse, war, or armed coercion. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 15 scored entries below, 2 tied, 209 above on Coercive Violence. Linked evidence NAMI says people should usually make their own treatment decisions but supports involuntary civil commitment as a last resort when voluntary engagement is not possible and the intervention is believed to be in the individual’s best interests. [2]
Identity Capture ? Customer pressure, employee pressure, and pervasive identity saturation. Range: -3 to 0.	-1	NAMI’s involuntary-commitment policy turns on diagnostic categories such as serious mental illness and court-ordered treatment eligibility, creating a limited diagnostic identity-capture exposure. NAMI’s involuntary-commitment policy turns on diagnostic categories such as serious mental illness and court-ordered treatment eligibility, creating a limited diagnostic identity-capture exposure. That warrants a limited Identity Capture penalty because users, workers, customers, or publics are pressured into identity attachment that protects institutional power. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 24 scored entries below, 6 tied, 196 above on Identity Capture. Linked evidence NAMI’s involuntary-commitment policy turns on diagnostic categories such as serious mental illness and court-ordered treatment eligibility, creating a limited diagnostic identity-capture exposure. [8]
Ideological Disavowal ? Concealed ideology presented as neutrality, expertise, professional necessity, public-service administration, market inevitability, or non-ideological common sense while exercising power. Range: -3 to 0.	-1	National Alliance on Mental Illness's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because National Alliance on Mental Illness shows bounded neutrality theater: some… National Alliance on Mental Illness's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because National Alliance on Mental Illness shows bounded neutrality theater: some contested choices are softened through expertise, public-interest, professional, market, safety, or institutional language, but the record does not. That warrants a limited Ideological Disavowal penalty because the institution presents situated, contested choices as neutrality, expertise, inevitability, safety, or common sense. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Ideological Disavowal 0 to -3 recalibration: 0 for explicit standpoint or no penalty-level neutrality theater; -1 for bounded softening of contested choices; -2 for strong neutrality theater by a powerful institution; -3 for major gatekeeping or coercive power presented as neutral, necessary, objective, or non-ideological. Uncertainty This recalibration uses public self-presentation and profile evidence; later review should add direct language-analysis evidence for high-impact institutions. Linked evidence National Alliance on Mental Illness's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because National Alliance on Mental Illness shows bounded neutrality theater: some contested choices are softened through expertise, public-interest, professional, market, safety, or institutional language, but the record does not show dominant concealment of standpoint. [9]

Bonus Credits

Bonus	Credit	Why this credit
Openness to Dissent ? Credit for tolerating internal, user, customer, worker, and public dissent without retaliation, capture, or viewpoint laundering.	2 / 3	NAMI’s policy page publicly acknowledges controversy and emotional difficulty around involuntary civil commitment and states support in constrained last-resort terms rather than presenting commitment as unqualified. NAMI’s policy page publicly acknowledges controversy and emotional difficulty around involuntary civil commitment and states support in constrained last-resort terms rather than presenting commitment as unqualified. That supports partial Openness to Dissent credit because people can criticize, dissent, or challenge the institution without being managed into silence. The value remains partial because the linked record does not show the practice as comprehensive, durable, or central enough for full credit. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 200 scored entries below, 15 tied, 11 above on Openness to Dissent. Linked evidence NAMI’s policy page publicly acknowledges controversy and emotional difficulty around involuntary civil commitment and states support in constrained last-resort terms rather than presenting commitment as unqualified. [4]
Constitutional Spirit ? Credit for respecting constitutional rights and civil-liberties norms even where private law does not strictly require it.	1 / 3	NAMI’s policy expressly affirms that people should have the right to make their own mental-health treatment decisions whenever possible, while retaining a last-resort exception. NAMI’s policy expressly affirms that people should have the right to make their own mental-health treatment decisions whenever possible, while retaining a last-resort exception. That supports partial Constitutional Spirit credit because the institution respects speech, privacy, due process, conscience, or civil-liberties norms beyond bare legal compulsion. The value remains partial because the linked record does not show the practice as comprehensive, durable, or central enough for full credit. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 182 scored entries below, 5 tied, 39 above on Constitutional Spirit. Linked evidence NAMI’s policy expressly affirms that people should have the right to make their own mental-health treatment decisions whenever possible, while retaining a last-resort exception. [5]
Good Deal ? Credit for unusually fair value: durable quality, fair pricing, low lock-in, and clear customer surplus.	1 / 3	NAMI provides free public help, education, crisis-navigation information, and support-group infrastructure, creating noncommercial public value despite policy problems around commitment. NAMI provides free public help, education, crisis-navigation information, and support-group infrastructure, creating noncommercial public value despite policy problems around commitment. That supports partial Good Deal credit because ordinary users receive unusually fair value, durability, access, or surplus. The value remains partial because the linked record does not show the practice as comprehensive, durable, or central enough for full credit. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 163 scored entries below, 21 tied, 42 above on Good Deal. Linked evidence NAMI provides free public help, education, crisis-navigation information, and support-group infrastructure, creating noncommercial public value despite policy problems around commitment. [6]

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

Medium 69/100

9 verified linked claims 9 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 9/17 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 14/20

9 verified linked claims

Source quality 12/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 9/18

9 direct claims across 17 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 5/10

9/17 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending

VerificationUnverified

ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)

ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)

Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.

Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

1NAMI provides support, education, helplines, advocacy, and policy resources for people and families affected by mental illness.

Product Integrity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 7, 2026

NAMI Policy PlatformOfficial self-description · 68%

2NAMI says people should usually make their own treatment decisions but supports involuntary civil commitment as a last resort when voluntary engagement is not possible and the intervention is believed to be in the individual’s best interests.

Coercive Violence Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 7, 2026

NAMI policy position: Involuntary Civil CommitmentOfficial self-description · 68%

3NAMI describes involuntary civil commitment as court-ordered inpatient or supervised outpatient psychiatric treatment without the individual’s consent, while acknowledging that involuntary commitment does not produce positive results for everyone.

Human Harm Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 7, 2026

NAMI policy position: Involuntary Civil CommitmentOfficial self-description · 68%

4NAMI’s policy page publicly acknowledges controversy and emotional difficulty around involuntary civil commitment and states support in constrained last-resort terms rather than presenting commitment as unqualified.

Openness To Dissent Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 7, 2026

NAMI policy position: Involuntary Civil CommitmentOfficial self-description · 68%

5NAMI’s policy expressly affirms that people should have the right to make their own mental-health treatment decisions whenever possible, while retaining a last-resort exception.

Constitutional Spirit Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 7, 2026

NAMI policy position: Involuntary Civil CommitmentOfficial self-description · 68%

6NAMI provides free public help, education, crisis-navigation information, and support-group infrastructure, creating noncommercial public value despite policy problems around commitment.

Good Deal Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 7, 2026

NAMI Policy PlatformOfficial self-description · 68%

7NAMI offers public support and advocacy value, but its policy stance is nonprofit-board governed and not structurally locked by the affected people most exposed to coercive treatment.

Reversibility Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 7, 2026

NAMI Policy PlatformOfficial self-description · 68%
NAMI policy position: Involuntary Civil CommitmentOfficial self-description · 68%

8NAMI’s involuntary-commitment policy turns on diagnostic categories such as serious mental illness and court-ordered treatment eligibility, creating a limited diagnostic identity-capture exposure.

Identity Capture Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 7, 2026

NAMI policy position: Involuntary Civil CommitmentOfficial self-description · 68%

9National Alliance on Mental Illness's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because National Alliance on Mental Illness shows bounded neutrality theater: some contested choices are softened through expertise, public-interest, professional, market, safety, or institutional language, but the record does not show dominant concealment of standpoint.

Ideological Disavowal Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 9, 2026

AI scaffold

National Alliance on Mental Illness official siteGeneral web source · 58%
NAMI Policy PlatformOfficial self-description · 68%
NAMI policy position: Involuntary Civil CommitmentOfficial self-description · 68%

Alternatives

Competitors

AGOOD66 People USA Rose Houses peer respite network · same market AGOOD66 Promise Resource Network Retreat peer-run respite · same market AGOOD66 Wildflower Alliance Afiya Peer Respite peer-run respite · same market AGOOD63 Trans Lifeline trans peer-support hotline · same market AGOOD61 CSPNJ Wellness Respite Services peer-operated respite network · same market AGOOD61 Georgia Peer Support and Wellness Respite Centers peer respite network · same market AGOOD61 Juniper Peer-Run Respite peer-run respite · same market AGOOD61 Karaya Peer Respite peer-run respite · same market

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for National Alliance on Mental Illness Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

May 7, 2026 at 12:00 AM UTC ai-scaffolding seed-added

Added psychiatric, professional-ethics, coercive psychiatric-system, peer-respite, or psychiatric-survivor alternative institution with source-backed claims and full score components.

View Full Audit Log