democratic open-data foundation
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Industry Open Source
A democratic open-data foundation supporting OpenStreetMap, free geographic data, and community-governed mapping infrastructure. OpenStreetMap Foundation scores well because ownership is comparatively aligned and the model leaves more value with stakeholders, and no current penalty outweighs that structure.
Why this matters: Open maps are a practical alternative to proprietary location infrastructure controlled by platform companies.
Letter grade A Good Medium confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1
* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.
Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.
Evaluation Overview
A - Good
The score turns mainly on Ownership; no penalty currently dominates the evaluation.
Strengths
- Ownership9/10
- Extraction9/10
- Governance8/10
Penalties
- No penalties applied in this version.
Evidence state
- ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)
- ThoroughnessPartial (AI)
- Linked claims6
- Direct axis claims6
- Coverage6/13
Scoring Axes
| Axis | Score | Why this score |
|---|---|---|
Ownership
?
Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control
at 10.
|
9 / 10 |
The linked record identifies OpenStreetMap Foundation as an international, not-for-profit, democratic organization supporting OSM and protecting the OSM database. |
Governance
?
Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic
stakeholder control at 10.
|
8 / 10 |
The linked record identifies OpenStreetMap Foundation as an international, not-for-profit, democratic organization supporting OSM and protecting the OSM database. Linked evidence
|
Extraction
?
Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured
extraction judgment.
|
9 / 10 |
The linked record identifies OpenStreetMap Foundation as an international, not-for-profit, democratic organization supporting OSM and protecting the OSM database. |
Labor Sovereignty
?
Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at
7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence
shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling,
retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of
worker voice, or extreme turnover.
|
5 / 7 |
The linked record identifies OpenStreetMap Foundation as an international, not-for-profit, democratic organization supporting OSM and protecting the OSM database. |
Solidarity with the
Unemployed
?
Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment,
and non-competes.
|
5 / 7 |
The linked record identifies OpenStreetMap Foundation as an international, not-for-profit, democratic organization supporting OSM and protecting the OSM database. |
Loss-Bearing Fidelity
?
Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and
public obligations.
|
6 / 7 |
The linked record identifies OpenStreetMap Foundation as an international, not-for-profit, democratic organization supporting OSM and protecting the OSM database. |
Market Conduct
?
Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.
|
5 / 5 |
The linked record identifies OpenStreetMap Foundation as an international, not-for-profit, democratic organization supporting OSM and protecting the OSM database. |
Product Integrity
?
Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.
|
5 / 5 |
The OSMF mission is to make the OpenStreetMap database available to all as free and open data. Linked evidence
|
Scale Integrity
?
Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.
|
4 / 5 |
The linked record identifies OpenStreetMap Foundation as an international, not-for-profit, democratic organization supporting OSM and protecting the OSM database. |
Penalties
No penalties applied in this version.
Bonus Credits
| Bonus | Credit | Why this credit |
|---|---|---|
Openness to Dissent
?
Credit for tolerating internal, user, customer, worker, and public
dissent without retaliation, capture, or viewpoint laundering.
|
2 / 3 |
OSMF states that membership is open to people who want to support the project and participate in its democratic process. Linked evidence
|
Constitutional Spirit
?
Credit for respecting constitutional rights and civil-liberties norms
even where private law does not strictly require it.
|
2 / 3 |
OSMF’s mission is to make the OpenStreetMap database available to all as free and open data. Linked evidence
|
Good Deal
?
Credit for unusually fair value: durable quality, fair pricing, low
lock-in, and clear customer surplus.
|
3 / 3 |
OpenStreetMap Foundation supports free and open map data available to everyone, creating unusually high user and developer value. Linked evidence
|
Cost Transparency
?
Credit for clear posted prices, all-in fees, unit costs, public rate
cards, margin/cost visibility, or surplus-allocation transparency,
especially in markets where opaque quotes, hidden fees, or
individualized pricing are normal.
|
1 / 3 |
OSMF publishes public finance materials and financial information for the project foundation. Linked evidence
|
Confidence Basis
Confidence Basis
Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.
Medium 69/100
6 verified linked claims 6 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 6/13 components covered
This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.
Claim confidence 19/20
6 verified linked claims
Source quality 10/18
Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability
Direct axis-specific claims 6/18
6 direct claims across 13 active components
Dispute load 12/12
0 disputed claims on this entity
Recency 10/10
Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026
Reviewer status 7/12
Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding
Component coverage 5/10
6/13 evidence-bearing components have direct support
Evidence State
Evidence State
Claims and Sources
Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.
* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.1OpenStreetMap Foundation describes itself as an international, not-for-profit, democratic organization supporting OSM and protecting the OSM database.
- OSMF mission statementGeneral web source · 58%
2The OSMF mission is to make the OpenStreetMap database available to all as free and open data.
- OSMF mission statementGeneral web source · 58%
3OSMF states that membership is open to people who want to support the project and participate in its democratic process.
- OSMF mission statementGeneral web source · 58%
4OSMF’s mission is to make the OpenStreetMap database available to all as free and open data.
- OSMF mission statementGeneral web source · 58%
5OpenStreetMap Foundation supports free and open map data available to everyone, creating unusually high user and developer value.
- OSMF mission statementGeneral web source · 58%
6OSMF publishes public finance materials and financial information for the project foundation.
- OSMF financesGeneral web source · 58%
Help Improve This Profile
Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.
How This Page Is Maintained
Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.
Civic Note
Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.
Submit evidence for OpenStreetMap Foundation Add one source-backed fact for review.
Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.
Audit Log
Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.
Added source-backed tentative evaluation during the A-grade/public-interest and nonobvious extraction expansion pass.