public company

Philip Morris International

Industry Health

A public tobacco and nicotine company selling cigarettes and smoke-free nicotine products, with addictive lethal products at population scale. Philip Morris International scores low because of documented human harm, ecological harm, and person-dependent governance, with poor loss-bearing fidelity and weak stakeholder ownership reinforcing the negative evaluation.

Why this matters: A product that foreseeably kills users when used as intended sets the upper anchor for consumer-facing human harm.

Letter grade F Malignant Medium confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1 Last reviewed May 6, 2026

Final Score -39* F - Malignant

FMALIGNANT-39 pts

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material5

Bonus+0

Cap35Ownership <= 2 and Governance <= 2

After Cap5

Penalties-44

!Not Verified

Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Evaluation Overview

F - Malignant

The score turns mainly on Labor Sovereignty, with the largest penalty coming from Human Harm.

Strengths

Labor Sovereignty2/7
Governance1/10
Extraction1/10

Penalties

Human Harm-20
Ecological Harm-6
Reversibility-5
Toxic Products-5

Evidence state

ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Linked claims9
Direct axis claims9
Coverage9/16

Scoring Axes

Axis	Score	Why this score
Ownership ? Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.	0 / 10	Philip Morris International is a shareholder-governed tobacco and nicotine company presenting a public corporate transformation strategy rather than worker or stakeholder control rights. Philip Morris International is a shareholder-governed tobacco and nicotine company presenting a public corporate transformation strategy rather than worker or stakeholder control rights. That keeps Philip Morris International low on Ownership: decisive control remains with shareholders, private owners, executives, or state insiders rather than affected people. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 0 scored entries below, 11 tied, 215 above on Ownership. Uncertainty Priority page: add more axis-specific research over time to make the comparative placement harder to dispute. Linked evidence Philip Morris International is a shareholder-governed tobacco and nicotine company presenting a public corporate transformation strategy rather than worker or stakeholder control rights. [1]
Governance ? Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.	1 / 10	Philip Morris International is a shareholder-governed tobacco and nicotine company presenting a public corporate transformation strategy rather than worker or stakeholder control rights. Philip Morris International is a shareholder-governed tobacco and nicotine company presenting a public corporate transformation strategy rather than worker or stakeholder control rights. That keeps Philip Morris International low on Governance: ordinary users, workers, customers, or affected communities cannot change the rules that govern them. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 2 scored entries below, 68 tied, 156 above on Governance. Linked evidence context Philip Morris International is a shareholder-governed tobacco and nicotine company presenting a public corporate transformation strategy rather than worker or stakeholder control rights. [1]
Extraction ? Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.	1 / 10	Philip Morris International is calibrated at the extraction floor because profit depends on addictive tobacco products with severe health harms, making surplus extraction inseparable from product harm. Philip Morris International is calibrated at the extraction floor because profit depends on addictive tobacco products with severe health harms, making surplus extraction inseparable from product harm. That keeps Philip Morris International low on Extraction: the business model makes extraction from workers, users, suppliers, customers, or the public central rather than incidental. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 2 scored entries below, 17 tied, 207 above on Extraction. Uncertainty Priority page: add more axis-specific research over time to make the comparative placement harder to dispute. Linked evidence context Philip Morris International is a shareholder-governed tobacco and nicotine company presenting a public corporate transformation strategy rather than worker or stakeholder control rights. [1] Philip Morris International is calibrated at the extraction floor because profit depends on addictive tobacco products with severe health harms, making surplus extraction inseparable from product harm. [2]
Labor Sovereignty ? Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.	2 / 7	Philip Morris International is a shareholder-governed tobacco and nicotine company presenting a public corporate transformation strategy rather than worker or stakeholder control rights. Philip Morris International is a shareholder-governed tobacco and nicotine company presenting a public corporate transformation strategy rather than worker or stakeholder control rights. That keeps Philip Morris International low on Labor Sovereignty: labor remains managerially controlled, replaceable, or exposed to coercive employment and contracting conditions. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 8 scored entries below, 36 tied, 182 above on Labor Sovereignty. Linked evidence context Philip Morris International is a shareholder-governed tobacco and nicotine company presenting a public corporate transformation strategy rather than worker or stakeholder control rights. [1]
Solidarity with the Unemployed ? Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.	1 / 7	Philip Morris International is a shareholder-governed tobacco and nicotine company presenting a public corporate transformation strategy rather than worker or stakeholder control rights. Philip Morris International is a shareholder-governed tobacco and nicotine company presenting a public corporate transformation strategy rather than worker or stakeholder control rights. That keeps Philip Morris International low on Solidarity with the Unemployed: the model provides little protection for people who leave, are excluded, or cannot bargain from employment. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 3 scored entries below, 27 tied, 196 above on Solidarity with the Unemployed. Linked evidence context Philip Morris International is a shareholder-governed tobacco and nicotine company presenting a public corporate transformation strategy rather than worker or stakeholder control rights. [1]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity ? Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.	0 / 7	Philip Morris International is a shareholder-governed tobacco and nicotine company presenting a public corporate transformation strategy rather than worker or stakeholder control rights. Philip Morris International is a shareholder-governed tobacco and nicotine company presenting a public corporate transformation strategy rather than worker or stakeholder control rights. That keeps Philip Morris International low on Loss-Bearing Fidelity: losses, hazards, or adjustment costs are routinely pushed onto workers, customers, suppliers, communities, or the public. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 0 scored entries below, 11 tied, 215 above on Loss-Bearing Fidelity. Linked evidence context Philip Morris International is a shareholder-governed tobacco and nicotine company presenting a public corporate transformation strategy rather than worker or stakeholder control rights. [1]
Market Conduct ? Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.	0 / 5	Philip Morris International is a shareholder-governed tobacco and nicotine company presenting a public corporate transformation strategy rather than worker or stakeholder control rights. Philip Morris International is a shareholder-governed tobacco and nicotine company presenting a public corporate transformation strategy rather than worker or stakeholder control rights. That keeps Philip Morris International low on Market Conduct: market power, lock-in, coercive pricing, or exclusionary conduct is a major part of the institution's position. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 0 scored entries below, 14 tied, 212 above on Market Conduct. Linked evidence context Philip Morris International is a shareholder-governed tobacco and nicotine company presenting a public corporate transformation strategy rather than worker or stakeholder control rights. [1]
Product Integrity ? Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.	0 / 5	Philip Morris International is a shareholder-governed tobacco and nicotine company presenting a public corporate transformation strategy rather than worker or stakeholder control rights. Philip Morris International is a shareholder-governed tobacco and nicotine company presenting a public corporate transformation strategy rather than worker or stakeholder control rights. That keeps Philip Morris International low on Product Integrity: the core offering is closely tied to harmful, addictive, deceptive, degrading, or low-integrity product design. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 0 scored entries below, 4 tied, 222 above on Product Integrity. Linked evidence context Philip Morris International is a shareholder-governed tobacco and nicotine company presenting a public corporate transformation strategy rather than worker or stakeholder control rights. [1]
Scale Integrity ? Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.	0 / 5	Philip Morris International is a shareholder-governed tobacco and nicotine company presenting a public corporate transformation strategy rather than worker or stakeholder control rights. Philip Morris International is a shareholder-governed tobacco and nicotine company presenting a public corporate transformation strategy rather than worker or stakeholder control rights. That keeps Philip Morris International low on Scale Integrity: scale magnifies harm, gatekeeping, opacity, or extraction rather than disciplining it. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 0 scored entries below, 13 tied, 213 above on Scale Integrity. Linked evidence context Philip Morris International is a shareholder-governed tobacco and nicotine company presenting a public corporate transformation strategy rather than worker or stakeholder control rights. [1]

Penalties

Penalty	Applied	Why this penalty
Reversibility ? Applied when positive conduct depends on current living leaders, founders, family owners, or other person-contingent governance rather than durable structure. Range: -5 to 0.	-5	Philip Morris International's favorable conduct depends partly on current leaders, founders, family owners, executive discretion, or other person-contingent control rather than a fully locked democratic stakeholder-control structure. Philip Morris International's favorable conduct depends partly on current leaders, founders, family owners, executive discretion, or other person-contingent control rather than a fully locked democratic stakeholder-control structure. That warrants a severe Reversibility penalty because favorable conduct depends on current people or discretionary leadership rather than locked stakeholder structure. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 0 scored entries below, 95 tied, 131 above on Reversibility. Linked evidence context Philip Morris International is a shareholder-governed tobacco and nicotine company presenting a public corporate transformation strategy rather than worker or stakeholder control rights. [1] Philip Morris International's favorable conduct depends partly on current leaders, founders, family owners, executive discretion, or other person-contingent control rather than a fully locked democratic stakeholder-control structure. [3]
Human Harm ? Severity, scale, culpability, vulnerable targets, willful reoffense, reputation laundering, pattern escalation, and time decay. Range: -20 to 0.	-20	WHO identifies tobacco as one of the largest public-health threats and states that tobacco kills more than 7 million people each year, while Philip Morris International remains materially tied to tobacco and nicotine revenues. WHO identifies tobacco as one of the largest public-health threats and states that tobacco kills more than 7 million people each year, while Philip Morris International remains materially tied to tobacco and nicotine revenues. That warrants a severe Human Harm penalty because ordinary operation, documented misconduct, or institutional power creates serious injury, deprivation, abuse, or foreseeable human damage. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 0 scored entries below, 9 tied, 217 above on Human Harm. Linked evidence WHO identifies tobacco as one of the largest public-health threats and states that tobacco kills more than 7 million people each year, while Philip Morris International remains materially tied to tobacco and nicotine revenues. [4]
Ecological Harm ? Footprint, trajectory, irreversibility, culpability, and scale, including whether ecological harm is central to the model and continued after credible notice. Range: -30 to 0.	-6	WHO identifies tobacco production and use as environmentally damaging, including waste, chemicals, land, water, and emissions burdens; PMI reports anti-littering programs while remaining materially tied to tobacco products. WHO identifies tobacco production and use as environmentally damaging, including waste, chemicals, land, water, and emissions burdens; PMI reports anti-littering programs while remaining materially tied to tobacco products. That warrants a substantial Ecological Harm penalty because the institution causes or defends ecological damage that is more than incidental to the model. The value is substantial but not at the floor because the linked record shows serious conduct without the strongest aggravating factors on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 18 scored entries below, 2 tied, 206 above on Ecological Harm. Linked evidence WHO identifies tobacco production and use as environmentally damaging, including waste, chemicals, land, water, and emissions burdens; PMI reports anti-littering programs while remaining materially tied to tobacco products. [5]
Toxic Products ? Current sale of products whose ordinary use, exposure, ingredients, residues, packaging, or formulation creates toxic, addictive, or consumer-safety risk. Food products receive at least light scrutiny for artificial colors, artificial flavors, petro-derived additives, pesticide residues, contaminants, endocrine-disrupting packaging, and ultra-processed formulation. Ordinary adult nightlife or alcohol service is not penalized by itself without evidence of predatory marketing, youth targeting, addiction-extractive design, or unusual product-safety misconduct. Range: -5 to 0.	-5	Philip Morris International currently sells tobacco and nicotine products as a core business; this describes conduct considered under Toxic Products the Toxic Products axis. Philip Morris International currently sells tobacco and nicotine products as a core business; this describes conduct considered under Toxic Products the Toxic Products axis. That warrants a severe Toxic Products penalty because ordinary use, exposure, ingredients, residues, packaging, or formulation creates material toxic, addictive, or consumer-safety risk. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 0 scored entries below, 1 tied, 225 above on Toxic Products. Linked evidence Philip Morris International currently sells tobacco and nicotine products as a core business; this describes conduct considered under Toxic Products the Toxic Products axis. [7]
Youth Capture ? Manipulative youth-directed marketing, youth-data or attention monetization, collectible/add-on traps, parasocial or identity capture, surprise mechanics, or treating young people as lower-disclosure consumers. Making useful toys or welcoming children is not itself penalized. Range: -5 to 0.	-5	Public health groups have documented Philip Morris International youth-marketing concerns, including allegations about IQOS social-media campaigns and a Marlboro campaign found by a German… Public health groups have documented Philip Morris International youth-marketing concerns, including allegations about IQOS social-media campaigns and a Marlboro campaign found by a German court to target youth, while tobacco settlement restrictions explicitly prohibit youth targeting. That warrants a severe Youth Capture penalty because young people are treated as manipulable consumers, data sources, attention targets, or culture markets. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 0 scored entries below, 2 tied, 224 above on Youth Capture. Linked evidence Public health groups have documented Philip Morris International youth-marketing concerns, including allegations about IQOS social-media campaigns and a Marlboro campaign found by a German court to target youth, while tobacco settlement restrictions explicitly prohibit youth targeting. [8]
Accountability Opacity ? Material opacity, reputation laundering, or hidden accountability structures that prevent public accountability. Range: -2 to 0.	-2	Philip Morris International's transformation narrative creates a accountability-opacity penalty because its public repositioning must be weighed against continued tobacco and nicotine harm. Philip Morris International's transformation narrative creates a accountability-opacity penalty because its public repositioning must be weighed against continued tobacco and nicotine harm. That warrants a severe Accountability Opacity penalty because material facts, risks, conflicts, ownership, or accountability information are obscured from the public. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 0 scored entries below, 52 tied, 174 above on Accountability Opacity. Linked evidence Philip Morris International's transformation narrative creates a accountability-opacity penalty because its public repositioning must be weighed against continued tobacco and nicotine harm. [6]
Ideological Disavowal ? Concealed ideology presented as neutrality, expertise, professional necessity, public-service administration, market inevitability, or non-ideological common sense while exercising power. Range: -3 to 0.	-1	Philip Morris International's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Philip Morris International shows bounded neutrality theater: some contested choices are… Philip Morris International's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Philip Morris International shows bounded neutrality theater: some contested choices are softened through expertise, public-interest, professional, market, safety, or institutional language, but the record does not show dominant. That warrants a limited Ideological Disavowal penalty because the institution presents situated, contested choices as neutrality, expertise, inevitability, safety, or common sense. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Ideological Disavowal 0 to -3 recalibration: 0 for explicit standpoint or no penalty-level neutrality theater; -1 for bounded softening of contested choices; -2 for strong neutrality theater by a powerful institution; -3 for major gatekeeping or coercive power presented as neutral, necessary, objective, or non-ideological. Uncertainty This recalibration uses public self-presentation and profile evidence; later review should add direct language-analysis evidence for high-impact institutions. Linked evidence Philip Morris International's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Philip Morris International shows bounded neutrality theater: some contested choices are softened through expertise, public-interest, professional, market, safety, or institutional language, but the record does not show dominant concealment of standpoint. [9]

Bonus Credits

No bonus credits applied in this version.

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

Medium 77/100

9 verified linked claims 9 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 9/16 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 17/20

9 verified linked claims

Source quality 16/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 9/18

9 direct claims across 16 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 6/10

9/16 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending

VerificationUnverified

ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)

ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)

Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.

Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

1Philip Morris International is a shareholder-governed tobacco and nicotine company presenting a public corporate transformation strategy rather than worker or stakeholder control rights.

Ownership Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 5, 2026

Philip Morris International Value Report 2025 announcementGeneral web source · 58%

2Philip Morris International is calibrated at the extraction floor because profit depends on addictive tobacco products with severe health harms, making surplus extraction inseparable from product harm.

Extraction Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 5, 2026

WHO tobacco fact sheetPrimary public record · 100%
Philip Morris International annual reportsPrimary institutional record · 90%

3Philip Morris International's favorable conduct depends partly on current leaders, founders, family owners, executive discretion, or other person-contingent control rather than a fully locked democratic stakeholder-control structure.

Reversibility Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 5, 2026

Philip Morris International Value Report 2025 announcementGeneral web source · 58%

4WHO identifies tobacco as one of the largest public-health threats and states that tobacco kills more than 7 million people each year, while Philip Morris International remains materially tied to tobacco and nicotine revenues.

Human Harm Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 5, 2026

WHO tobacco fact sheetPrimary public record · 100%
Philip Morris International Value Report 2025 announcementGeneral web source · 58%

5WHO identifies tobacco production and use as environmentally damaging, including waste, chemicals, land, water, and emissions burdens; PMI reports anti-littering programs while remaining materially tied to tobacco products.

Ecological Harm Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 5, 2026

WHO tobacco fact sheetPrimary public record · 100%
Philip Morris International Value Report 2025 announcementGeneral web source · 58%

6Philip Morris International's transformation narrative creates a accountability-opacity penalty because its public repositioning must be weighed against continued tobacco and nicotine harm.

Accountability Opacity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 5, 2026

WHO tobacco fact sheetPrimary public record · 100%
Philip Morris International Value Report 2025 announcementGeneral web source · 58%

7Philip Morris International currently sells tobacco and nicotine products as a core business; this describes conduct considered under Toxic Products the Toxic Products axis.

Toxic Products Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 6, 2026

AI scaffold

Philip Morris International Value Report 2025 announcementGeneral web source · 58%
WHO tobacco fact sheetPrimary public record · 100%

8Public health groups have documented Philip Morris International youth-marketing concerns, including allegations about IQOS social-media campaigns and a Marlboro campaign found by a German court to target youth, while tobacco settlement restrictions explicitly prohibit youth targeting.

Youth Capture Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 7, 2026

Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids: PMI social media youth marketing reportGeneral web source · 58%
Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids: IQOS youth concernsGeneral web source · 58%
Pennsylvania AG: Master Settlement Agreement youth advertising restrictionsPrimary public record · 100%

9Philip Morris International's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Philip Morris International shows bounded neutrality theater: some contested choices are softened through expertise, public-interest, professional, market, safety, or institutional language, but the record does not show dominant concealment of standpoint.

Ideological Disavowal Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 9, 2026

AI scaffold

Philip Morris International official siteGeneral web source · 58%
Philip Morris International Value Report 2025 announcementGeneral web source · 58%
WHO tobacco fact sheetPrimary public record · 100%

Alternatives

Competitors

AGOOD66 Patient Advocate Foundation nonprofit patient case-management and financial-aid resource · United States AGOOD57 Outside In youth, health, housing, and harm-reduction nonprofit · Oregon, Pacific Northwest AGOOD54 Federally Qualified Health Centers publicly supported community health-center system · United States AGOOD53 OpenNotes academic healthcare-transparency initiative · United States AGOOD50 CPESN USA network of independent community pharmacies · United States BQUALIFIED49 Civica Rx nonprofit generic medicine company · United States BQUALIFIED43 Planned Parenthood nonprofit reproductive and sexual healthcare federation · United States CPERFORMATIVE41 En-Vision America / ScriptAbility accessible prescription-labeling company · United States

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for Philip Morris International Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

May 7, 2026 at 12:00 AM UTC ai-scaffolding youth-capture-assessment

Added source-backed Youth Capture penalty -5 based on evidence specific to youth data, child-directed marketing, loot-box/gambling-like monetization, or youth-culture manipulation.

May 6, 2026 at 12:00 AM UTC ai-scaffolding toxic-products-assessment

Added tentative AI-generated Toxic Products penalty -5 and directory value for current toxic, addictive, pesticide, livestock, chemical, or consumer-safety product exposure.

May 5, 2026 at 12:00 AM UTC ai-scaffolding ai-scaffolding-score

Added tentative claim-backed worst-offender calibration score for human-harm scale comparison.

View Full Audit Log