public company

Ross Stores

Industry Retail

A public off-price retailer operating Ross Dress for Less and dd’s Discounts, selling apparel, footwear, home goods, and accessories. Ross gives price relief to shoppers, but apparel-supply opacity, low-price labor pressure, data collection, and shareholder governance keep it low.

Why this matters: Ross is a direct off-price comparison with TJX and Burlington and a practical alternative to department stores and fast fashion.

Letter grade D Extractive High confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1 Last reviewed May 11, 2026

Final Score 9* D - Extractive

DEXTRACTIVE9 pts

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material18

Bonus+1

Cap35Ownership <= 2 and Governance <= 2

After Cap19

Penalties-10

!Not Verified

Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Evaluation Overview

D - Extractive

The score turns mainly on Market Conduct, with the largest penalty coming from Ecological Harm.

Strengths

Market Conduct3/5
Product Integrity3/5
Ownership2/10

Penalties

Ecological Harm-4
Accountability Opacity-2
Toxic Products-1
Identity Capture-1

Evidence state

ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Linked claims21
Direct axis claims21
Coverage16/16

Scoring Axes

Axis	Score	Why this score
Ownership ? Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.	2 / 10	Ross is a public shareholder-governed retailer rather than a worker, supplier, customer, or community-controlled institution. Ross is a public shareholder-governed retailer rather than a worker, supplier, customer, or community-controlled institution. That keeps Ross Stores low on Ownership: decisive control remains with shareholders, private owners, executives, or state insiders rather than affected people. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Linked evidence Ross is a public shareholder-governed retailer rather than a worker, supplier, customer, or community-controlled institution. [1] Ross Stores is not governed by workers, customers, suppliers, or affected communities; formal control remains with shareholders, family owners, parent-company owners, creditors, or managers. [2]
Governance ? Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.	2 / 10	Ross Stores gives stakeholders ordinary market voice, employment voice, or customer-service channels, but not binding democratic control over major institutional decisions. Ross Stores gives stakeholders ordinary market voice, employment voice, or customer-service channels, but not binding democratic control over major institutional decisions. That keeps Ross Stores low on Governance: ordinary users, workers, customers, or affected communities cannot change the rules that govern them. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Linked evidence context Ross is a public shareholder-governed retailer rather than a worker, supplier, customer, or community-controlled institution. [1] context Ross Stores operates Ross Dress for Less and dd’s Discounts, selling off-price apparel, footwear, accessories, and home goods. [3] context Ross provides low-price access, but the bargain model depends on supplier opacity, low labor leverage, and scale purchasing rather than transparent surplus sharing. [4] Ross Stores gives stakeholders ordinary market voice, employment voice, or customer-service channels, but not binding democratic control over major institutional decisions. [5]
Extraction ? Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.	2 / 10	Ross Stores sells useful goods while retaining a conventional retail structure in which surplus, pricing power, supplier pressure, and labor control are primarily managerial or investor-facing. Ross Stores sells useful goods while retaining a conventional retail structure in which surplus, pricing power, supplier pressure, and labor control are primarily managerial or investor-facing. That keeps Ross Stores low on Extraction: the business model makes extraction from workers, users, suppliers, customers, or the public central rather than incidental. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Linked evidence context Ross Stores operates Ross Dress for Less and dd’s Discounts, selling off-price apparel, footwear, accessories, and home goods. [3] context Ross is a public shareholder-governed retailer rather than a worker, supplier, customer, or community-controlled institution. [1] context Ross provides low-price access, but the bargain model depends on supplier opacity, low labor leverage, and scale purchasing rather than transparent surplus sharing. [4] Ross Stores sells useful goods while retaining a conventional retail structure in which surplus, pricing power, supplier pressure, and labor control are primarily managerial or investor-facing. [6]
Labor Sovereignty ? Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.	1 / 7	Ross Stores workers remain in ordinary employer-managed retail jobs rather than worker-owned, codetermined, or union-secured control structures. Ross Stores workers remain in ordinary employer-managed retail jobs rather than worker-owned, codetermined, or union-secured control structures. That keeps Ross Stores low on Labor Sovereignty: labor remains managerially controlled, replaceable, or exposed to coercive employment and contracting conditions. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Linked evidence context Ross is a public shareholder-governed retailer rather than a worker, supplier, customer, or community-controlled institution. [1] Ross Stores workers remain in ordinary employer-managed retail jobs rather than worker-owned, codetermined, or union-secured control structures. [7]
Solidarity with the Unemployed ? Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.	1 / 7	Ross Stores does not show unusual source-backed protection for workers who exit, people outside paid work, or customers with weak bargaining power beyond ordinary retail access. Ross Stores does not show unusual source-backed protection for workers who exit, people outside paid work, or customers with weak bargaining power beyond ordinary retail access. That keeps Ross Stores low on Solidarity with the Unemployed: the model provides little protection for people who leave, are excluded, or cannot bargain from employment. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Linked evidence context Ross Stores operates Ross Dress for Less and dd’s Discounts, selling off-price apparel, footwear, accessories, and home goods. [3] context Ross provides low-price access, but the bargain model depends on supplier opacity, low labor leverage, and scale purchasing rather than transparent surplus sharing. [4] Ross Stores does not show unusual source-backed protection for workers who exit, people outside paid work, or customers with weak bargaining power beyond ordinary retail access. [8]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity ? Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.	2 / 7	Ross Stores still shifts important costs from data collection, product churn, sourcing, packaging, pharmacy, fashion, or local-market power onto customers, workers, suppliers, or the public. Ross Stores still shifts important costs from data collection, product churn, sourcing, packaging, pharmacy, fashion, or local-market power onto customers, workers, suppliers, or the public. That keeps Ross Stores low on Loss-Bearing Fidelity: losses, hazards, or adjustment costs are routinely pushed onto workers, customers, suppliers, communities, or the public. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Linked evidence context Ross Stores operates Ross Dress for Less and dd’s Discounts, selling off-price apparel, footwear, accessories, and home goods. [3] context Ross is a public shareholder-governed retailer rather than a worker, supplier, customer, or community-controlled institution. [1] context Ross participates in high-volume apparel and home-goods supply chains with textile waste, packaging, logistics, and sourcing externalities. [9] context Ross privacy materials describe collection through stores, websites, services, analytics, advertising, and business interactions. [10] context Ross provides low-price access, but the bargain model depends on supplier opacity, low labor leverage, and scale purchasing rather than transparent surplus sharing. [4] Ross Stores still shifts important costs from data collection, product churn, sourcing, packaging, pharmacy, fashion, or local-market power onto customers, workers, suppliers, or the public. [11]
Market Conduct ? Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.	3 / 5	Ross provides low-price access, but the bargain model depends on supplier opacity, low labor leverage, and scale purchasing rather than transparent surplus sharing. Ross provides low-price access, but the bargain model depends on supplier opacity, low labor leverage, and scale purchasing rather than transparent surplus sharing. That places Ross Stores in the middle of Market Conduct: the product has real value but still uses meaningful lock-in, gatekeeping, market power, or dependency. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Linked evidence Ross provides low-price access, but the bargain model depends on supplier opacity, low labor leverage, and scale purchasing rather than transparent surplus sharing. [4] Ross Stores shapes customer choice through scale, loyalty, credit, pharmacy, promotion, fashion, recommendation, or data systems rather than through simple transparent one-time transactions alone. [12]
Product Integrity ? Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.	3 / 5	Ross Stores operates Ross Dress for Less and dd’s Discounts, selling off-price apparel, footwear, accessories, and home goods. Ross Stores operates Ross Dress for Less and dd’s Discounts, selling off-price apparel, footwear, accessories, and home goods. That places Ross Stores in the middle of Product Integrity: the product has real use value but is compromised by incentives, monetization, lock-in, quality degradation, or risk. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Linked evidence Ross Stores operates Ross Dress for Less and dd’s Discounts, selling off-price apparel, footwear, accessories, and home goods. [3] Ross Stores sells products or services with practical value, but product integrity is limited where quality is mixed with churn, exposure risk, identity marketing, or opaque sourcing. [13]
Scale Integrity ? Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.	2 / 5	Ross Stores uses scale to improve access and convenience while also concentrating purchasing power, customer data, supplier leverage, and environmental burden. Ross Stores uses scale to improve access and convenience while also concentrating purchasing power, customer data, supplier leverage, and environmental burden. That places Ross Stores in the middle of Scale Integrity: scale brings useful reach but also weakens accountability, transparency, or local constraint. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Linked evidence context Ross Stores operates Ross Dress for Less and dd’s Discounts, selling off-price apparel, footwear, accessories, and home goods. [3] context Ross is a public shareholder-governed retailer rather than a worker, supplier, customer, or community-controlled institution. [1] context Ross participates in high-volume apparel and home-goods supply chains with textile waste, packaging, logistics, and sourcing externalities. [9] context Ross provides low-price access, but the bargain model depends on supplier opacity, low labor leverage, and scale purchasing rather than transparent surplus sharing. [4] Ross Stores uses scale to improve access and convenience while also concentrating purchasing power, customer data, supplier leverage, and environmental burden. [14]

Penalties

Penalty	Applied	Why this penalty
Ecological Harm ? Footprint, trajectory, irreversibility, culpability, and scale, including whether ecological harm is central to the model and continued after credible notice. Range: -30 to 0.	-4	Ross participates in high-volume apparel and home-goods supply chains with textile waste, packaging, logistics, and sourcing externalities. Ross participates in high-volume apparel and home-goods supply chains with textile waste, packaging, logistics, and sourcing externalities. That warrants a limited Ecological Harm penalty because the institution causes or defends ecological damage that is more than incidental to the model. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Linked evidence Ross participates in high-volume apparel and home-goods supply chains with textile waste, packaging, logistics, and sourcing externalities. [9] Ross Stores depends on retail operations, packaging, logistics, refrigeration, apparel, beauty, fuel, pharmacy, or product churn with material environmental costs. [16]
Toxic Products ? Current sale of products whose ordinary use, exposure, ingredients, residues, packaging, or formulation creates toxic, addictive, or consumer-safety risk. Food products receive at least light scrutiny for artificial colors, artificial flavors, petro-derived additives, pesticide residues, contaminants, endocrine-disrupting packaging, and ultra-processed formulation. Ordinary adult nightlife or alcohol service is not penalized by itself without evidence of predatory marketing, youth targeting, addiction-extractive design, or unusual product-safety misconduct. Range: -5 to 0.	-1	Ross Stores sells product categories such as pharmacy goods, supplements, cosmetics, fragrance, candles, cheap plastics, candy, or personal-care products where exposure or safety risk is material. Ross Stores sells product categories such as pharmacy goods, supplements, cosmetics, fragrance, candles, cheap plastics, candy, or personal-care products where exposure or safety risk is material. That warrants a limited Toxic Products penalty because ordinary use, exposure, ingredients, residues, packaging, or formulation creates material toxic, addictive, or consumer-safety risk. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Linked evidence Ross Stores sells product categories such as pharmacy goods, supplements, cosmetics, fragrance, candles, cheap plastics, candy, or personal-care products where exposure or safety risk is material. [17]
Accountability Opacity ? Material opacity, reputation laundering, or hidden accountability structures that prevent public accountability. Range: -2 to 0.	-2	Ross Stores leaves ordinary customers unable to easily compare the full data, sourcing, ingredient, pricing, supply-chain, or loyalty tradeoffs before buying. Ross Stores leaves ordinary customers unable to easily compare the full data, sourcing, ingredient, pricing, supply-chain, or loyalty tradeoffs before buying. That warrants a severe Accountability Opacity penalty because material facts, risks, conflicts, ownership, or accountability information are obscured from the public. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Linked evidence context Ross privacy materials describe collection through stores, websites, services, analytics, advertising, and business interactions. [10] context Ross participates in high-volume apparel and home-goods supply chains with textile waste, packaging, logistics, and sourcing externalities. [9] Ross Stores leaves ordinary customers unable to easily compare the full data, sourcing, ingredient, pricing, supply-chain, or loyalty tradeoffs before buying. [18]
Identity Capture ? Customer pressure, employee pressure, and pervasive identity saturation. Range: -3 to 0.	-1	Ross Stores turns consumption into beauty, fashion, wellness, status, fandom, sport, youth, scent, or lifestyle identity rather than simple product access. Ross Stores turns consumption into beauty, fashion, wellness, status, fandom, sport, youth, scent, or lifestyle identity rather than simple product access. That warrants a limited Identity Capture penalty because users, workers, customers, or publics are pressured into identity attachment that protects institutional power. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Linked evidence Ross Stores turns consumption into beauty, fashion, wellness, status, fandom, sport, youth, scent, or lifestyle identity rather than simple product access. [19]
Surveillance Capture ? Invasive surveillance, unreasonably non-optional tracking, facial recognition, biometric identification, or AI behavior scanning of customers, workers, bystanders, or the public. Range: -5 to 0.	-1	Ross privacy materials describe collection through stores, websites, services, analytics, advertising, and business interactions. Ross privacy materials describe collection through stores, websites, services, analytics, advertising, and business interactions. That warrants a limited Surveillance Capture penalty because customers, workers, users, bystanders, or the public are exposed to invasive tracking, biometrics, or behavior scanning. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Linked evidence Ross privacy materials describe collection through stores, websites, services, analytics, advertising, and business interactions. [10] Ross Stores privacy materials show collection through stores, apps, websites, accounts, loyalty, pharmacy, advertising, device, preference, or transaction data channels. [20]
Ideological Disavowal ? Concealed ideology presented as neutrality, expertise, professional necessity, public-service administration, market inevitability, or non-ideological common sense while exercising power. Range: -3 to 0.	-1	Ross Stores presents retail access as neutral consumer choice while underplaying institutional choices embedded in data collection, loyalty design, sourcing, identity marketing, supplier power, and pricing architecture. Ross Stores presents retail access as neutral consumer choice while underplaying institutional choices embedded in data collection, loyalty design, sourcing, identity marketing, supplier power, and pricing architecture. That warrants a limited Ideological Disavowal penalty because the institution presents situated, contested choices as neutrality, expertise, inevitability, safety, or common sense. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Linked evidence context Ross provides low-price access, but the bargain model depends on supplier opacity, low labor leverage, and scale purchasing rather than transparent surplus sharing. [4] context Ross privacy materials describe collection through stores, websites, services, analytics, advertising, and business interactions. [10] Ross Stores presents retail access as neutral consumer choice while underplaying institutional choices embedded in data collection, loyalty design, sourcing, identity marketing, supplier power, and pricing architecture. [21]

Bonus Credits

Bonus	Credit	Why this credit
Good Deal ? Credit for unusually fair value: durable quality, fair pricing, low lock-in, and clear customer surplus.	1 / 3	Ross Stores provides a limited customer-value advantage against adjacent competitors through price access, product utility, regional service, or durability, but not enough to overcome governance limits. Ross Stores provides a limited customer-value advantage against adjacent competitors through price access, product utility, regional service, or durability, but not enough to overcome governance limits. That supports partial Good Deal credit because ordinary users receive unusually fair value, durability, access, or surplus. The value remains partial because the linked record does not show the practice as comprehensive, durable, or central enough for full credit. Linked evidence context Ross provides low-price access, but the bargain model depends on supplier opacity, low labor leverage, and scale purchasing rather than transparent surplus sharing. [4] Ross Stores provides a limited customer-value advantage against adjacent competitors through price access, product utility, regional service, or durability, but not enough to overcome governance limits. [15]

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

High 82/100

21 verified linked claims 21 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 16/16 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 13/20

21 verified linked claims

Source quality 16/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 14/18

21 direct claims across 16 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 10/10

16/16 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending

VerificationUnverified

ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)

ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)

Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.

Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

1Ross is a public shareholder-governed retailer rather than a worker, supplier, customer, or community-controlled institution.

Ownership Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

Ross privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
Ross annual reportsPrimary institutional record · 90%
Ross responsibility governance and ethicsGeneral web source · 58%

2Ross Stores is not governed by workers, customers, suppliers, or affected communities; formal control remains with shareholders, family owners, parent-company owners, creditors, or managers.

Ownership Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

Ross privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
Ross annual reportsPrimary institutional record · 90%
Ross responsibility governance and ethicsGeneral web source · 58%

3Ross Stores operates Ross Dress for Less and dd’s Discounts, selling off-price apparel, footwear, accessories, and home goods.

Product Integrity Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

Ross privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
Ross annual reportsPrimary institutional record · 90%
Ross responsibility governance and ethicsGeneral web source · 58%

4Ross provides low-price access, but the bargain model depends on supplier opacity, low labor leverage, and scale purchasing rather than transparent surplus sharing.

Market Conduct Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

Ross privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
Ross annual reportsPrimary institutional record · 90%
Ross responsibility governance and ethicsGeneral web source · 58%

5Ross Stores gives stakeholders ordinary market voice, employment voice, or customer-service channels, but not binding democratic control over major institutional decisions.

Governance Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

Ross privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
Ross annual reportsPrimary institutional record · 90%
Ross responsibility governance and ethicsGeneral web source · 58%

6Ross Stores sells useful goods while retaining a conventional retail structure in which surplus, pricing power, supplier pressure, and labor control are primarily managerial or investor-facing.

Extraction Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

Ross privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
Ross annual reportsPrimary institutional record · 90%
Ross responsibility governance and ethicsGeneral web source · 58%

7Ross Stores workers remain in ordinary employer-managed retail jobs rather than worker-owned, codetermined, or union-secured control structures.

Labor Sovereignty Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

Ross privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
Ross annual reportsPrimary institutional record · 90%
Ross responsibility governance and ethicsGeneral web source · 58%

8Ross Stores does not show unusual source-backed protection for workers who exit, people outside paid work, or customers with weak bargaining power beyond ordinary retail access.

Solidarity Unemployed Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

Ross privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
Ross annual reportsPrimary institutional record · 90%
Ross responsibility governance and ethicsGeneral web source · 58%

9Ross participates in high-volume apparel and home-goods supply chains with textile waste, packaging, logistics, and sourcing externalities.

Ecological Harm Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

Ross privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
Ross annual reportsPrimary institutional record · 90%
Ross responsibility governance and ethicsGeneral web source · 58%

10Ross privacy materials describe collection through stores, websites, services, analytics, advertising, and business interactions.

Surveillance Capture Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

Ross privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
Ross annual reportsPrimary institutional record · 90%
Ross responsibility governance and ethicsGeneral web source · 58%

11Ross Stores still shifts important costs from data collection, product churn, sourcing, packaging, pharmacy, fashion, or local-market power onto customers, workers, suppliers, or the public.

Loss Bearing Fidelity Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

Ross privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
Ross annual reportsPrimary institutional record · 90%
Ross responsibility governance and ethicsGeneral web source · 58%

12Ross Stores shapes customer choice through scale, loyalty, credit, pharmacy, promotion, fashion, recommendation, or data systems rather than through simple transparent one-time transactions alone.

Market Conduct Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

Ross privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
Ross annual reportsPrimary institutional record · 90%
Ross responsibility governance and ethicsGeneral web source · 58%

13Ross Stores sells products or services with practical value, but product integrity is limited where quality is mixed with churn, exposure risk, identity marketing, or opaque sourcing.

Product Integrity Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

Ross privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
Ross annual reportsPrimary institutional record · 90%
Ross responsibility governance and ethicsGeneral web source · 58%

14Ross Stores uses scale to improve access and convenience while also concentrating purchasing power, customer data, supplier leverage, and environmental burden.

Scale Integrity Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

Ross privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
Ross annual reportsPrimary institutional record · 90%
Ross responsibility governance and ethicsGeneral web source · 58%

15Ross Stores provides a limited customer-value advantage against adjacent competitors through price access, product utility, regional service, or durability, but not enough to overcome governance limits.

Good Deal Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

Ross privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
Ross annual reportsPrimary institutional record · 90%
Ross responsibility governance and ethicsGeneral web source · 58%

16Ross Stores depends on retail operations, packaging, logistics, refrigeration, apparel, beauty, fuel, pharmacy, or product churn with material environmental costs.

Ecological Harm Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

Ross privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
Ross annual reportsPrimary institutional record · 90%
Ross responsibility governance and ethicsGeneral web source · 58%

17Ross Stores sells product categories such as pharmacy goods, supplements, cosmetics, fragrance, candles, cheap plastics, candy, or personal-care products where exposure or safety risk is material.

Toxic Products Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

Ross privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
Ross annual reportsPrimary institutional record · 90%
Ross responsibility governance and ethicsGeneral web source · 58%

18Ross Stores leaves ordinary customers unable to easily compare the full data, sourcing, ingredient, pricing, supply-chain, or loyalty tradeoffs before buying.

Accountability Opacity Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

Ross privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
Ross annual reportsPrimary institutional record · 90%
Ross responsibility governance and ethicsGeneral web source · 58%

19Ross Stores turns consumption into beauty, fashion, wellness, status, fandom, sport, youth, scent, or lifestyle identity rather than simple product access.

Identity Capture Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

Ross privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
Ross annual reportsPrimary institutional record · 90%
Ross responsibility governance and ethicsGeneral web source · 58%

20Ross Stores privacy materials show collection through stores, apps, websites, accounts, loyalty, pharmacy, advertising, device, preference, or transaction data channels.

Surveillance Capture Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

Ross privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
Ross annual reportsPrimary institutional record · 90%
Ross responsibility governance and ethicsGeneral web source · 58%

21Ross Stores presents retail access as neutral consumer choice while underplaying institutional choices embedded in data collection, loyalty design, sourcing, identity marketing, supplier power, and pricing architecture.

Ideological Disavowal Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

Ross privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
Ross annual reportsPrimary institutional record · 90%
Ross responsibility governance and ethicsGeneral web source · 58%

Alternatives

BQUALIFIED44 Ace Hardware retailer-owned hardware cooperative · same market BQUALIFIED43 Do it Best member-owned hardware cooperative · same market BQUALIFIED42 Dr. Bronner's private benefit corporation · same market BQUALIFIED47 John Lewis Partnership employee-owned retailer · United Kingdom BQUALIFIED45 Second Use Building Materials employee-owned building-material salvage business · Washington, Pacific Northwest

Competitors

BQUALIFIED44 Ace Hardware retailer-owned hardware cooperative · same market BQUALIFIED43 Do it Best member-owned hardware cooperative · same market BQUALIFIED42 Dr. Bronner's private benefit corporation · same market CPERFORMATIVE41 Patagonia private company · same market CPERFORMATIVE38 REI Co-op consumer cooperative · same market CPERFORMATIVE37 Taylor Guitars private instrument maker · same market DEXTRACTIVE34 Framework Computer private repairable-electronics company · same market DEXTRACTIVE34 Grove Collaborative public benefit household-products company · same market

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for Ross Stores Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.

View Full Audit Log