driver cooperative platform
The Drivers Cooperative
Industry Mobility
A driver-owned ride-hailing platform selling trips in New York, structured to return platform economics and governance power to drivers. The Drivers Cooperative scores well because ownership is comparatively aligned and governance has stronger accountability than peers, and no current penalty outweighs that structure.
Why this matters: Platform cooperatives test whether worker ownership can alter app-mediated labor markets.
Letter grade A Good High confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1
* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.
Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.
Evaluation Overview
A - Good
The score turns mainly on Ownership, with the largest penalty coming from High-Carbon Products.
Strengths
- Ownership10/10
- Governance9/10
- Extraction8/10
Penalties
- High-Carbon Products-5
Evidence state
- ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)
- ThoroughnessPartial (AI)
- Linked claims10
- Direct axis claims10
- Coverage10/10
Scoring Axes
| Axis | Score | Why this score |
|---|---|---|
Ownership
?
Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control
at 10.
|
10 / 10 |
The linked record identifies The Drivers Cooperative as a driver-owned rideshare cooperative. Linked evidence
|
Governance
?
Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic
stakeholder control at 10.
|
9 / 10 |
The linked record identifies The Drivers Cooperative as a driver-owned rideshare cooperative. |
Extraction
?
Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured
extraction judgment.
|
8 / 10 |
The linked record identifies The Drivers Cooperative as a driver-owned rideshare cooperative. |
Labor Sovereignty
?
Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at
7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence
shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling,
retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of
worker voice, or extreme turnover.
|
7 / 7 |
The Drivers Cooperative's driver-owned model gives drivers a structural claim on platform value and governance that conventional rideshare platforms deny. |
Solidarity with the
Unemployed
?
Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment,
and non-competes.
|
6 / 7 |
The linked record identifies The Drivers Cooperative as a driver-owned rideshare cooperative. |
Loss-Bearing Fidelity
?
Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and
public obligations.
|
6 / 7 |
The linked record identifies The Drivers Cooperative as a driver-owned rideshare cooperative. |
Market Conduct
?
Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.
|
4 / 5 |
The Drivers Cooperative states that it returns more money to drivers than conventional rideshare platforms. Linked evidence
|
Product Integrity
?
Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.
|
4 / 5 |
The Drivers Cooperative states that it returns more money to drivers than conventional rideshare platforms. |
Scale Integrity
?
Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.
|
4 / 5 |
The Drivers Cooperative states that it returns more money to drivers than conventional rideshare platforms. |
Penalties
| Penalty | Applied | Why this penalty |
|---|---|---|
High-Carbon Products
?
Core products, services, financing, or supply chains that materially
depend on fossil-fuel combustion, high-emissions transport, industrial
animal agriculture, meat, dairy, or other unusually carbon-intensive
activity. This is scored separately from general ecological harm so
ordinary consumers can see carbon-intensive product exposure directly.
Range: -10 to 0.
|
-5 |
Combustion transport, vehicle fleets, fuel, rental trucks, or transport platforms create material high-carbon exposure. Linked evidence
|
Bonus Credits
No bonus credits applied in this version.
Confidence Basis
Confidence Basis
Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.
High 81/100
10 verified linked claims 10 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 10/10 components covered
This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.
Claim confidence 16/20
10 verified linked claims
Source quality 13/18
Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability
Direct axis-specific claims 14/18
10 direct claims across 10 active components
Dispute load 12/12
0 disputed claims on this entity
Recency 10/10
Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026
Reviewer status 7/12
Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding
Component coverage 10/10
10/10 evidence-bearing components have direct support
Evidence State
Evidence State
Claims and Sources
Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.
* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.1The Drivers Cooperative describes itself as a driver-owned rideshare cooperative.
- The Drivers Cooperative homepageGeneral web source · 58%
2The Drivers Cooperative describes itself as a driver-owned rideshare cooperative built around driver ownership of the platform.
- The Drivers CooperativeGeneral web source · 58%
- The Drivers Cooperative aboutOfficial self-description · 68%
4The Drivers Cooperative's driver-owned model gives drivers a structural claim on platform value and governance that conventional rideshare platforms deny.
- The Drivers Cooperative aboutOfficial self-description · 68%
5The Drivers Cooperative gives New York drivers an alternative platform model, but the reviewed record does not show broad access for people outside its operating market.
- The Drivers CooperativeGeneral web source · 58%
- The Drivers Cooperative aboutOfficial self-description · 68%
6The Drivers Cooperative's driver-owned structure ties platform economics more closely to drivers, while riders, cities, and traffic externalities remain outside direct governance.
- The Drivers Cooperative aboutOfficial self-description · 68%
7The Drivers Cooperative states that it returns more money to drivers than conventional rideshare platforms.
- The Drivers Cooperative aboutOfficial self-description · 68%
8The Drivers Cooperative provides ride-hailing trips through a driver-owned model rather than a conventional investor-controlled platform.
- The Drivers CooperativeGeneral web source · 58%
- The Drivers Cooperative aboutOfficial self-description · 68%
9The Drivers Cooperative operates as a local driver-owned platform rather than a globally scaled investor rideshare network.
- The Drivers CooperativeGeneral web source · 58%
- The Drivers Cooperative aboutOfficial self-description · 68%
10The Drivers Cooperative has combustion transport exposure high-carbon product exposure based on its listed business model and current profile description: A driver-owned ride-hailing platform selling trips in New York, structured to return platform economics and governance power to drivers. The Drivers Cooperative scores well because ownership is comparatively aligned and…
- The Drivers Cooperative public siteGeneral web source · 58%
- EPA: Transportation Sector EmissionsPrimary public record · 100%
Help Improve This Profile
Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.
How This Page Is Maintained
Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.
Civic Note
Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.
Submit evidence for The Drivers Cooperative Add one source-backed fact for review.
Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.
Audit Log
Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.
Added tentative AI-generated Toxic Products penalty 0 and directory value for current toxic, addictive, pesticide, livestock, chemical, or consumer-safety product exposure.
Added tentative AI-generated claim-backed score components for a previously listed under-review company or group.