LGBTQ youth crisis support and suicide-prevention nonprofit

The Trevor Project

A nonprofit providing 24/7 phone, text, and chat crisis support for LGBTQ young people, plus education and advocacy. The Trevor Project remains a high-value specialized resource, but it is capped below A because its crisis-service terms reserve authority to alert law enforcement, state authorities, or emergency services when communications indicate imminent risk of death or serious injury.

Why this matters: This is a high-value resource because generic crisis systems often miss the specific family, identity, safety, and institutional risks facing LGBTQ youth, but it should not be represented as a no-active-rescue line.

Letter grade B Qualified High confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1 Last reviewed May 13, 2026

Final Score 45* B - Qualified

BQUALIFIED45 pts

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material55

Bonus+9

Cap49Crisis-line active-rescue cap: nonconsensual emergency-services, law-enforcement, or involuntary psychiatric escalation risk keeps crisis hotlines below A unless consent-based safeguards are documented

After Cap49

Penalties-4

!Not Verified

Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Evaluation Overview

B - Qualified

The score turns mainly on Extraction, with the largest penalty coming from Coercive Violence.

Strengths

Extraction8/10
Ownership7/10
Governance7/10

Penalties

Coercive Violence-2
Identity Capture-1
Surveillance Capture-1

Evidence state

ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Linked claims16
Direct axis claims16
Coverage16/16

Scoring Axes

Axis	Score	Why this score
Ownership ? Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.	7 / 10	The Trevor Project's public record identifies whether the resource is nonprofit, federal, peer-run, culturally specific, or otherwise structured outside ordinary commercial lead generation. The Trevor Project's public record identifies whether the resource is nonprofit, federal, peer-run, culturally specific, or otherwise structured outside ordinary commercial lead generation. On Ownership, The Trevor Project sits near the top of this resource category because the public-facing service directly reduces dependency, crisis exposure, legal confusion, medical bureaucracy, or access barriers without turning the user into a monetized lead. The value stops short of perfect where the resource depends on outside funding, partners, or uneven local implementation. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Public resources expansion calibrated across helplines, legal-aid portals, federal benefit and disaster systems, treatment locators, digital inclusion nonprofits, and direct aid navigation resources. Linked evidence The Trevor Project's public record identifies whether the resource is nonprofit, federal, peer-run, culturally specific, or otherwise structured outside ordinary commercial lead generation. [1] context The Trevor Project's public materials show the decision structure and accountability context behind the public-facing help resource. [2] context The Trevor Project's reviewed model determines whether help is delivered as free public infrastructure, nonprofit service, federal portal, paid referral, or commercial capture of vulnerable users. [3] context The Trevor Project's public record shows whether advocates, volunteers, peers, or staff provide help through a mission-oriented service rather than a purely extractive labor model. [4] context The Trevor Project's resource helps people with crisis, abuse, legal, treatment, benefits, food, disaster, digital access, health-cost, or other practical needs that often fall outside normal paid consumer markets. [5] context The Trevor Project's service absorbs navigation, search, information, referral, advocacy, emotional-support, or application burdens that would otherwise be pushed onto people in distress. [6] context The Trevor Project operates in an area where commercial substitutes often monetize desperation, confusion, lead generation, recurring fees, or informational asymmetry. [7] context The Trevor Project's core usefulness depends on accessible information, trained support, current referrals, confidentiality, eligibility clarity, and avoiding exploitative handoffs. [8] context The Trevor Project's scale affects whether the resource remains accessible, noncommercial, culturally competent, and accountable as public need increases. [9]
Governance ? Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.	7 / 10	The Trevor Project's linked public materials show the decision structure and accountability context behind the public-facing help resource. The Trevor Project's linked public materials show the decision structure and accountability context behind the public-facing help resource. On Governance, The Trevor Project sits near the top of this resource category because the public-facing service directly reduces dependency, crisis exposure, legal confusion, medical bureaucracy, or access barriers without turning the user into a monetized lead. The value stops short of perfect where the resource depends on outside funding, partners, or uneven local implementation. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Public resources expansion calibrated across helplines, legal-aid portals, federal benefit and disaster systems, treatment locators, digital inclusion nonprofits, and direct aid navigation resources. Linked evidence context The Trevor Project's public record identifies whether the resource is nonprofit, federal, peer-run, culturally specific, or otherwise structured outside ordinary commercial lead generation. [1] The Trevor Project's public materials show the decision structure and accountability context behind the public-facing help resource. [2] context The Trevor Project's reviewed model determines whether help is delivered as free public infrastructure, nonprofit service, federal portal, paid referral, or commercial capture of vulnerable users. [3] context The Trevor Project's public record shows whether advocates, volunteers, peers, or staff provide help through a mission-oriented service rather than a purely extractive labor model. [4] context The Trevor Project's resource helps people with crisis, abuse, legal, treatment, benefits, food, disaster, digital access, health-cost, or other practical needs that often fall outside normal paid consumer markets. [5] context The Trevor Project's service absorbs navigation, search, information, referral, advocacy, emotional-support, or application burdens that would otherwise be pushed onto people in distress. [6] context The Trevor Project operates in an area where commercial substitutes often monetize desperation, confusion, lead generation, recurring fees, or informational asymmetry. [7] context The Trevor Project's core usefulness depends on accessible information, trained support, current referrals, confidentiality, eligibility clarity, and avoiding exploitative handoffs. [8] context The Trevor Project's scale affects whether the resource remains accessible, noncommercial, culturally competent, and accountable as public need increases. [9]
Extraction ? Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.	8 / 10	The Trevor Project's reviewed model determines whether help is delivered as free public infrastructure, nonprofit service, federal portal, paid referral, or commercial capture of vulnerable users. The Trevor Project's reviewed model determines whether help is delivered as free public infrastructure, nonprofit service, federal portal, paid referral, or commercial capture of vulnerable users. On Extraction, The Trevor Project sits near the top of this resource category because the public-facing service directly reduces dependency, crisis exposure, legal confusion, medical bureaucracy, or access barriers without turning the user into a monetized lead. The value stops short of perfect where the resource depends on outside funding, partners, or uneven local implementation. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Public resources expansion calibrated across helplines, legal-aid portals, federal benefit and disaster systems, treatment locators, digital inclusion nonprofits, and direct aid navigation resources. Linked evidence context The Trevor Project's public record identifies whether the resource is nonprofit, federal, peer-run, culturally specific, or otherwise structured outside ordinary commercial lead generation. [1] context The Trevor Project's public materials show the decision structure and accountability context behind the public-facing help resource. [2] The Trevor Project's reviewed model determines whether help is delivered as free public infrastructure, nonprofit service, federal portal, paid referral, or commercial capture of vulnerable users. [3] context The Trevor Project's public record shows whether advocates, volunteers, peers, or staff provide help through a mission-oriented service rather than a purely extractive labor model. [4] context The Trevor Project's resource helps people with crisis, abuse, legal, treatment, benefits, food, disaster, digital access, health-cost, or other practical needs that often fall outside normal paid consumer markets. [5] context The Trevor Project's service absorbs navigation, search, information, referral, advocacy, emotional-support, or application burdens that would otherwise be pushed onto people in distress. [6] context The Trevor Project operates in an area where commercial substitutes often monetize desperation, confusion, lead generation, recurring fees, or informational asymmetry. [7] context The Trevor Project's core usefulness depends on accessible information, trained support, current referrals, confidentiality, eligibility clarity, and avoiding exploitative handoffs. [8] context The Trevor Project's scale affects whether the resource remains accessible, noncommercial, culturally competent, and accountable as public need increases. [9]
Labor Sovereignty ? Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.	5 / 7	The Trevor Project's public record gives limited direct evidence about whether advocates, volunteers, peers, or staff provide help through a mission-oriented service rather than a purely extractive labor model. The Trevor Project's public record gives limited direct evidence about whether advocates, volunteers, peers, or staff provide help through a mission-oriented service rather than a purely extractive labor model. On Labor Sovereignty, The Trevor Project belongs in the positive middle because it provides real public utility and reduces a practical power imbalance. It remains below the strongest entries where federal bureaucracy, partner variation, limited hours, data sensitivity, or less direct governance weakens user control. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Public resources expansion calibrated across helplines, legal-aid portals, federal benefit and disaster systems, treatment locators, digital inclusion nonprofits, and direct aid navigation resources. Linked evidence context The Trevor Project's public record identifies whether the resource is nonprofit, federal, peer-run, culturally specific, or otherwise structured outside ordinary commercial lead generation. [1] context The Trevor Project's public materials show the decision structure and accountability context behind the public-facing help resource. [2] context The Trevor Project's reviewed model determines whether help is delivered as free public infrastructure, nonprofit service, federal portal, paid referral, or commercial capture of vulnerable users. [3] The Trevor Project's public record shows whether advocates, volunteers, peers, or staff provide help through a mission-oriented service rather than a purely extractive labor model. [4] context The Trevor Project's resource helps people with crisis, abuse, legal, treatment, benefits, food, disaster, digital access, health-cost, or other practical needs that often fall outside normal paid consumer markets. [5] context The Trevor Project's service absorbs navigation, search, information, referral, advocacy, emotional-support, or application burdens that would otherwise be pushed onto people in distress. [6] context The Trevor Project operates in an area where commercial substitutes often monetize desperation, confusion, lead generation, recurring fees, or informational asymmetry. [7] context The Trevor Project's core usefulness depends on accessible information, trained support, current referrals, confidentiality, eligibility clarity, and avoiding exploitative handoffs. [8] context The Trevor Project's scale affects whether the resource remains accessible, noncommercial, culturally competent, and accountable as public need increases. [9]
Solidarity with the Unemployed ? Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.	7 / 7	The Trevor Project's resource helps people with crisis, abuse, legal, treatment, benefits, food, disaster, digital access, health-cost, or other practical needs that often fall outside normal paid consumer markets. The Trevor Project's resource helps people with crisis, abuse, legal, treatment, benefits, food, disaster, digital access, health-cost, or other practical needs that often fall outside normal paid consumer markets. On Solidarity with the Unemployed, The Trevor Project sits near the top of this resource category because the public-facing service directly reduces dependency, crisis exposure, legal confusion, medical bureaucracy, or access barriers without turning the user into a monetized lead. The value stops short of perfect where the resource depends on outside funding, partners, or uneven local implementation. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Public resources expansion calibrated across helplines, legal-aid portals, federal benefit and disaster systems, treatment locators, digital inclusion nonprofits, and direct aid navigation resources. Linked evidence context The Trevor Project's public record identifies whether the resource is nonprofit, federal, peer-run, culturally specific, or otherwise structured outside ordinary commercial lead generation. [1] context The Trevor Project's public materials show the decision structure and accountability context behind the public-facing help resource. [2] context The Trevor Project's reviewed model determines whether help is delivered as free public infrastructure, nonprofit service, federal portal, paid referral, or commercial capture of vulnerable users. [3] context The Trevor Project's public record shows whether advocates, volunteers, peers, or staff provide help through a mission-oriented service rather than a purely extractive labor model. [4] The Trevor Project's resource helps people with crisis, abuse, legal, treatment, benefits, food, disaster, digital access, health-cost, or other practical needs that often fall outside normal paid consumer markets. [5] context The Trevor Project's service absorbs navigation, search, information, referral, advocacy, emotional-support, or application burdens that would otherwise be pushed onto people in distress. [6] context The Trevor Project operates in an area where commercial substitutes often monetize desperation, confusion, lead generation, recurring fees, or informational asymmetry. [7] context The Trevor Project's core usefulness depends on accessible information, trained support, current referrals, confidentiality, eligibility clarity, and avoiding exploitative handoffs. [8] context The Trevor Project's scale affects whether the resource remains accessible, noncommercial, culturally competent, and accountable as public need increases. [9]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity ? Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.	7 / 7	The Trevor Project's service absorbs navigation, search, information, referral, advocacy, emotional-support, or application burdens that would otherwise be pushed onto people in distress. The Trevor Project's service absorbs navigation, search, information, referral, advocacy, emotional-support, or application burdens that would otherwise be pushed onto people in distress. On Loss-Bearing Fidelity, The Trevor Project sits near the top of this resource category because the public-facing service directly reduces dependency, crisis exposure, legal confusion, medical bureaucracy, or access barriers without turning the user into a monetized lead. The value stops short of perfect where the resource depends on outside funding, partners, or uneven local implementation. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Public resources expansion calibrated across helplines, legal-aid portals, federal benefit and disaster systems, treatment locators, digital inclusion nonprofits, and direct aid navigation resources. Linked evidence context The Trevor Project's public record identifies whether the resource is nonprofit, federal, peer-run, culturally specific, or otherwise structured outside ordinary commercial lead generation. [1] context The Trevor Project's public materials show the decision structure and accountability context behind the public-facing help resource. [2] context The Trevor Project's reviewed model determines whether help is delivered as free public infrastructure, nonprofit service, federal portal, paid referral, or commercial capture of vulnerable users. [3] context The Trevor Project's public record shows whether advocates, volunteers, peers, or staff provide help through a mission-oriented service rather than a purely extractive labor model. [4] context The Trevor Project's resource helps people with crisis, abuse, legal, treatment, benefits, food, disaster, digital access, health-cost, or other practical needs that often fall outside normal paid consumer markets. [5] The Trevor Project's service absorbs navigation, search, information, referral, advocacy, emotional-support, or application burdens that would otherwise be pushed onto people in distress. [6] context The Trevor Project operates in an area where commercial substitutes often monetize desperation, confusion, lead generation, recurring fees, or informational asymmetry. [7] context The Trevor Project's core usefulness depends on accessible information, trained support, current referrals, confidentiality, eligibility clarity, and avoiding exploitative handoffs. [8] context The Trevor Project's scale affects whether the resource remains accessible, noncommercial, culturally competent, and accountable as public need increases. [9]
Market Conduct ? Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.	5 / 5	The Trevor Project operates in an area where commercial substitutes often monetize desperation, confusion, lead generation, recurring fees, or informational asymmetry. The Trevor Project operates in an area where commercial substitutes often monetize desperation, confusion, lead generation, recurring fees, or informational asymmetry. On Market Conduct, The Trevor Project belongs in the positive middle because it provides real public utility and reduces a practical power imbalance. It remains below the strongest entries where federal bureaucracy, partner variation, limited hours, data sensitivity, or less direct governance weakens user control. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Public resources expansion calibrated across helplines, legal-aid portals, federal benefit and disaster systems, treatment locators, digital inclusion nonprofits, and direct aid navigation resources. Linked evidence context The Trevor Project's public record identifies whether the resource is nonprofit, federal, peer-run, culturally specific, or otherwise structured outside ordinary commercial lead generation. [1] context The Trevor Project's public materials show the decision structure and accountability context behind the public-facing help resource. [2] context The Trevor Project's reviewed model determines whether help is delivered as free public infrastructure, nonprofit service, federal portal, paid referral, or commercial capture of vulnerable users. [3] context The Trevor Project's public record shows whether advocates, volunteers, peers, or staff provide help through a mission-oriented service rather than a purely extractive labor model. [4] context The Trevor Project's resource helps people with crisis, abuse, legal, treatment, benefits, food, disaster, digital access, health-cost, or other practical needs that often fall outside normal paid consumer markets. [5] context The Trevor Project's service absorbs navigation, search, information, referral, advocacy, emotional-support, or application burdens that would otherwise be pushed onto people in distress. [6] The Trevor Project operates in an area where commercial substitutes often monetize desperation, confusion, lead generation, recurring fees, or informational asymmetry. [7] context The Trevor Project's core usefulness depends on accessible information, trained support, current referrals, confidentiality, eligibility clarity, and avoiding exploitative handoffs. [8] context The Trevor Project's scale affects whether the resource remains accessible, noncommercial, culturally competent, and accountable as public need increases. [9]
Product Integrity ? Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.	5 / 5	The Trevor Project's core usefulness depends on accessible information, trained support, current referrals, confidentiality, eligibility clarity, and avoiding exploitative handoffs. The Trevor Project's core usefulness depends on accessible information, trained support, current referrals, confidentiality, eligibility clarity, and avoiding exploitative handoffs. On Product Integrity, The Trevor Project belongs in the positive middle because it provides real public utility and reduces a practical power imbalance. It remains below the strongest entries where federal bureaucracy, partner variation, limited hours, data sensitivity, or less direct governance weakens user control. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Public resources expansion calibrated across helplines, legal-aid portals, federal benefit and disaster systems, treatment locators, digital inclusion nonprofits, and direct aid navigation resources. Linked evidence context The Trevor Project's public record identifies whether the resource is nonprofit, federal, peer-run, culturally specific, or otherwise structured outside ordinary commercial lead generation. [1] context The Trevor Project's public materials show the decision structure and accountability context behind the public-facing help resource. [2] context The Trevor Project's reviewed model determines whether help is delivered as free public infrastructure, nonprofit service, federal portal, paid referral, or commercial capture of vulnerable users. [3] context The Trevor Project's public record shows whether advocates, volunteers, peers, or staff provide help through a mission-oriented service rather than a purely extractive labor model. [4] context The Trevor Project's resource helps people with crisis, abuse, legal, treatment, benefits, food, disaster, digital access, health-cost, or other practical needs that often fall outside normal paid consumer markets. [5] context The Trevor Project's service absorbs navigation, search, information, referral, advocacy, emotional-support, or application burdens that would otherwise be pushed onto people in distress. [6] context The Trevor Project operates in an area where commercial substitutes often monetize desperation, confusion, lead generation, recurring fees, or informational asymmetry. [7] The Trevor Project's core usefulness depends on accessible information, trained support, current referrals, confidentiality, eligibility clarity, and avoiding exploitative handoffs. [8] context The Trevor Project's scale affects whether the resource remains accessible, noncommercial, culturally competent, and accountable as public need increases. [9]
Scale Integrity ? Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.	4 / 5	The Trevor Project's scale affects whether the resource remains accessible, noncommercial, culturally competent, and accountable as public need increases. The Trevor Project's scale affects whether the resource remains accessible, noncommercial, culturally competent, and accountable as public need increases. On Scale Integrity, The Trevor Project belongs in the positive middle because it provides real public utility and reduces a practical power imbalance. It remains below the strongest entries where federal bureaucracy, partner variation, limited hours, data sensitivity, or less direct governance weakens user control. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Public resources expansion calibrated across helplines, legal-aid portals, federal benefit and disaster systems, treatment locators, digital inclusion nonprofits, and direct aid navigation resources. Linked evidence context The Trevor Project's public record identifies whether the resource is nonprofit, federal, peer-run, culturally specific, or otherwise structured outside ordinary commercial lead generation. [1] context The Trevor Project's public materials show the decision structure and accountability context behind the public-facing help resource. [2] context The Trevor Project's reviewed model determines whether help is delivered as free public infrastructure, nonprofit service, federal portal, paid referral, or commercial capture of vulnerable users. [3] context The Trevor Project's public record shows whether advocates, volunteers, peers, or staff provide help through a mission-oriented service rather than a purely extractive labor model. [4] context The Trevor Project's resource helps people with crisis, abuse, legal, treatment, benefits, food, disaster, digital access, health-cost, or other practical needs that often fall outside normal paid consumer markets. [5] context The Trevor Project's service absorbs navigation, search, information, referral, advocacy, emotional-support, or application burdens that would otherwise be pushed onto people in distress. [6] context The Trevor Project operates in an area where commercial substitutes often monetize desperation, confusion, lead generation, recurring fees, or informational asymmetry. [7] context The Trevor Project's core usefulness depends on accessible information, trained support, current referrals, confidentiality, eligibility clarity, and avoiding exploitative handoffs. [8] The Trevor Project's scale affects whether the resource remains accessible, noncommercial, culturally competent, and accountable as public need increases. [9]

Penalties

Penalty	Applied	Why this penalty
Coercive Violence ? Direct or institutionally enabled killing, torture, detention abuse, armed repression, forced displacement, violent domination, or nonconsensual crisis-line emergency escalation that exposes callers to confinement or force. Range: -30 to 0.	-2	The Trevor Project warrants a light Coercive Violence penalty because its crisis-service terms reserve authority to alert law enforcement, state authorities, or emergency services when communications indicate imminent risk of death or serious injury. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Crisis-line active-rescue calibration: lines that reserve nonconsensual police, 911, emergency-service, or involuntary psychiatric escalation cannot score like consent-based peer support; deceptive or frequent escalation should be capped more severely. Linked evidence The Trevor Project terms reserve authority to alert law enforcement, state authorities, or emergency services when communications indicate imminent risk of death or serious physical injury. [14]
Identity Capture ? Customer pressure, employee pressure, and pervasive identity saturation. Range: -3 to 0.	-1	The Trevor Project's public record makes Identity Capture relevant through its crisis practices, privacy posture, public-service claims, free access, legal-rights work, or referral architecture. The Trevor Project's public record makes Identity Capture relevant through its crisis practices, privacy posture, public-service claims, free access, legal-rights work, or referral architecture. This creates a Identity Capture penalty because the resource touches sensitive personal need, crisis information, government eligibility, or emergency response, where privacy, coercion, disclosure, and institutional framing matter. The penalty is limited where the evidence shows managed risk rather than a business model built around exploitation. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Public resources expansion calibrated across helplines, legal-aid portals, federal benefit and disaster systems, treatment locators, digital inclusion nonprofits, and direct aid navigation resources. Linked evidence The Trevor Project's public record makes Identity Capture relevant through its crisis practices, privacy posture, public-service claims, free access, legal-rights work, or referral architecture. [15]
Surveillance Capture ? Invasive surveillance, unreasonably non-optional tracking, facial recognition, biometric identification, or AI behavior scanning of customers, workers, bystanders, or the public. Range: -5 to 0.	-1	The Trevor Project's public record makes Surveillance Capture relevant through its crisis practices, privacy posture, public-service claims, free access, legal-rights work, or referral architecture. The Trevor Project's public record makes Surveillance Capture relevant through its crisis practices, privacy posture, public-service claims, free access, legal-rights work, or referral architecture. This creates a Surveillance Capture penalty because the resource touches sensitive personal need, crisis information, government eligibility, or emergency response, where privacy, coercion, disclosure, and institutional framing matter. The penalty is limited where the evidence shows managed risk rather than a business model built around exploitation. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Public resources expansion calibrated across helplines, legal-aid portals, federal benefit and disaster systems, treatment locators, digital inclusion nonprofits, and direct aid navigation resources. Linked evidence The Trevor Project's public record makes Surveillance Capture relevant through its crisis practices, privacy posture, public-service claims, free access, legal-rights work, or referral architecture. [16]

Bonus Credits

Bonus	Credit	Why this credit
Openness to Dissent ? Credit for tolerating internal, user, customer, worker, and public dissent without retaliation, capture, or viewpoint laundering.	2 / 3	The Trevor Project's public record makes Openness to Dissent relevant through its crisis practices, privacy posture, public-service claims, free access, legal-rights work, or referral architecture. The Trevor Project's public record makes Openness to Dissent relevant through its crisis practices, privacy posture, public-service claims, free access, legal-rights work, or referral architecture. This adds Openness to Dissent credit because the resource gives people unusually clear, free, rights-respecting, or dependency-reducing help in a domain where paid markets and bureaucracies often fail. The credit is limited where the practice is not fully peer-run, not universally available, or still depends on outside systems. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Public resources expansion calibrated across helplines, legal-aid portals, federal benefit and disaster systems, treatment locators, digital inclusion nonprofits, and direct aid navigation resources. Linked evidence The Trevor Project's public record makes Openness to Dissent relevant through its crisis practices, privacy posture, public-service claims, free access, legal-rights work, or referral architecture. [10]
Constitutional Spirit ? Credit for respecting constitutional rights and civil-liberties norms even where private law does not strictly require it.	2 / 3	The Trevor Project's public record makes Constitutional Spirit relevant through its crisis practices, privacy posture, public-service claims, free access, legal-rights work, or referral architecture. The Trevor Project's public record makes Constitutional Spirit relevant through its crisis practices, privacy posture, public-service claims, free access, legal-rights work, or referral architecture. This adds Constitutional Spirit credit because the resource gives people unusually clear, free, rights-respecting, or dependency-reducing help in a domain where paid markets and bureaucracies often fail. The credit is limited where the practice is not fully peer-run, not universally available, or still depends on outside systems. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Public resources expansion calibrated across helplines, legal-aid portals, federal benefit and disaster systems, treatment locators, digital inclusion nonprofits, and direct aid navigation resources. Linked evidence The Trevor Project's public record makes Constitutional Spirit relevant through its crisis practices, privacy posture, public-service claims, free access, legal-rights work, or referral architecture. [11]
Good Deal ? Credit for unusually fair value: durable quality, fair pricing, low lock-in, and clear customer surplus.	3 / 3	The Trevor Project's public record makes Good Deal relevant through its crisis practices, privacy posture, public-service claims, free access, legal-rights work, or referral architecture. The Trevor Project's public record makes Good Deal relevant through its crisis practices, privacy posture, public-service claims, free access, legal-rights work, or referral architecture. This adds Good Deal credit because the resource gives people unusually clear, free, rights-respecting, or dependency-reducing help in a domain where paid markets and bureaucracies often fail. The credit is limited where the practice is not fully peer-run, not universally available, or still depends on outside systems. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Public resources expansion calibrated across helplines, legal-aid portals, federal benefit and disaster systems, treatment locators, digital inclusion nonprofits, and direct aid navigation resources. Linked evidence The Trevor Project's public record makes Good Deal relevant through its crisis practices, privacy posture, public-service claims, free access, legal-rights work, or referral architecture. [12]
Cost Transparency ? Credit for clear posted prices, all-in fees, unit costs, public rate cards, margin/cost visibility, or surplus-allocation transparency, especially in markets where opaque quotes, hidden fees, or individualized pricing are normal.	2 / 3	The Trevor Project's public record makes Cost Transparency relevant through its crisis practices, privacy posture, public-service claims, free access, legal-rights work, or referral architecture. The Trevor Project's public record makes Cost Transparency relevant through its crisis practices, privacy posture, public-service claims, free access, legal-rights work, or referral architecture. This adds Cost Transparency credit because the resource gives people unusually clear, free, rights-respecting, or dependency-reducing help in a domain where paid markets and bureaucracies often fail. The credit is limited where the practice is not fully peer-run, not universally available, or still depends on outside systems. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Public resources expansion calibrated across helplines, legal-aid portals, federal benefit and disaster systems, treatment locators, digital inclusion nonprofits, and direct aid navigation resources. Linked evidence The Trevor Project's public record makes Cost Transparency relevant through its crisis practices, privacy posture, public-service claims, free access, legal-rights work, or referral architecture. [13]

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

High 80/100

16 verified linked claims 16 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 16/16 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 16/20

16 verified linked claims

Source quality 10/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 14/18

16 direct claims across 16 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 15, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 10/10

16/16 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending

VerificationUnverified

ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)

ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)

Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.

Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

1The Trevor Project's public record identifies whether the resource is nonprofit, federal, peer-run, culturally specific, or otherwise structured outside ordinary commercial lead generation.

Ownership Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

The Trevor ProjectGeneral web source · 58%

2The Trevor Project's public materials show the decision structure and accountability context behind the public-facing help resource.

Governance Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

The Trevor ProjectGeneral web source · 58%

3The Trevor Project's reviewed model determines whether help is delivered as free public infrastructure, nonprofit service, federal portal, paid referral, or commercial capture of vulnerable users.

Extraction Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

The Trevor ProjectGeneral web source · 58%

4The Trevor Project's public record shows whether advocates, volunteers, peers, or staff provide help through a mission-oriented service rather than a purely extractive labor model.

Labor Sovereignty Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Trevor crisis servicesGeneral web source · 58%

5The Trevor Project's resource helps people with crisis, abuse, legal, treatment, benefits, food, disaster, digital access, health-cost, or other practical needs that often fall outside normal paid consumer markets.

Solidarity Unemployed Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Trevor crisis servicesGeneral web source · 58%

6The Trevor Project's service absorbs navigation, search, information, referral, advocacy, emotional-support, or application burdens that would otherwise be pushed onto people in distress.

Loss Bearing Fidelity Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Trevor crisis servicesGeneral web source · 58%

7The Trevor Project operates in an area where commercial substitutes often monetize desperation, confusion, lead generation, recurring fees, or informational asymmetry.

Market Conduct Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Trevor crisis servicesGeneral web source · 58%

8The Trevor Project's core usefulness depends on accessible information, trained support, current referrals, confidentiality, eligibility clarity, and avoiding exploitative handoffs.

Product Integrity Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

The Trevor ProjectGeneral web source · 58%

9The Trevor Project's scale affects whether the resource remains accessible, noncommercial, culturally competent, and accountable as public need increases.

Scale Integrity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Trevor crisis servicesGeneral web source · 58%

10The Trevor Project's public record makes Openness to Dissent relevant through its crisis practices, privacy posture, public-service claims, free access, legal-rights work, or referral architecture.

Openness To Dissent Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Trevor crisis servicesGeneral web source · 58%

11The Trevor Project's public record makes Constitutional Spirit relevant through its crisis practices, privacy posture, public-service claims, free access, legal-rights work, or referral architecture.

Constitutional Spirit Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Trevor crisis servicesGeneral web source · 58%

12The Trevor Project's public record makes Good Deal relevant through its crisis practices, privacy posture, public-service claims, free access, legal-rights work, or referral architecture.

Good Deal Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Trevor crisis servicesGeneral web source · 58%

13The Trevor Project's public record makes Cost Transparency relevant through its crisis practices, privacy posture, public-service claims, free access, legal-rights work, or referral architecture.

Cost Transparency Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Trevor crisis servicesGeneral web source · 58%

14The Trevor Project terms reserve authority to alert law enforcement, state authorities, or emergency services when communications indicate imminent risk of death or serious physical injury.

Coercive Violence Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 15, 2026

AI scaffold

The Trevor Project Terms of ServiceGeneral web source · 58%

15The Trevor Project's public record makes Identity Capture relevant through its crisis practices, privacy posture, public-service claims, free access, legal-rights work, or referral architecture.

Identity Capture Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Trevor crisis servicesGeneral web source · 58%

16The Trevor Project's public record makes Surveillance Capture relevant through its crisis practices, privacy posture, public-service claims, free access, legal-rights work, or referral architecture.

Surveillance Capture Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Trevor crisis servicesGeneral web source · 58%

Alternatives

Competitors

AGOOD66 People USA Rose Houses peer respite network · same market AGOOD66 Promise Resource Network Retreat peer-run respite · same market AGOOD66 Wildflower Alliance Afiya Peer Respite peer-run respite · same market AGOOD63 Trans Lifeline trans peer-support hotline · same market AGOOD61 CSPNJ Wellness Respite Services peer-operated respite network · same market AGOOD61 Georgia Peer Support and Wellness Respite Centers peer respite network · same market AGOOD61 Juniper Peer-Run Respite peer-run respite · same market AGOOD61 Karaya Peer Respite peer-run respite · same market

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for The Trevor Project Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.

View Full Audit Log