Wikimedia Foundation

nonprofit

Wikimedia Foundation

Industry Publishing

A nonprofit steward of Wikipedia and related public-knowledge projects, with donor funding, volunteer production, and movement governance tensions. Wikimedia scores as one of the strongest knowledge-infrastructure entries because its usefulness is broad, nonproprietary, and only lightly mediated by market power.

Why this matters: Public knowledge infrastructure should be accountable to users, contributors, and donors.

Letter grade A Good High confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1

Final Score 53* A - Good
AGOOD53 tentative score pts

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material48
Bonus+5
Cap66No structure cap
After Cap53
Penalties0
!Not Verified
Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Evaluation Overview

A - Good

The score turns mainly on Extraction; no penalty currently dominates the evaluation.

Strengths

  • Extraction8/10
  • Governance6/10
  • Ownership5/10

Penalties

  • No penalties applied in this version.

Evidence state

  • ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)
  • ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
  • Linked claims14
  • Direct axis claims11
  • Coverage11/11

Scoring Axes
Axis Score Why this score
Ownership
?
Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.
5 / 10

Wikimedia Foundation states that it is a donor-funded U.S. 501(c)(3) nonprofit and publishes financial reports, audit reports, annual plans, and Form 990s.

Calibration notes

Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 118 scored entries below, 6 tied, 102 above on Ownership.

Linked evidence
  • context Wikimedia Foundation is a nonprofit that publishes financial reports for its public knowledge projects. [1]
  • context Wikimedia Foundation describes its mission as supporting free knowledge projects for the public. [2]
  • Wikimedia Foundation states that it is a donor-funded U.S. 501(c)(3) nonprofit and publishes financial reports, audit reports, annual plans, and Form 990s. [3]
Governance
?
Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.
6 / 10

Wikimedia Foundation is a nonprofit that publishes financial reports for its public knowledge projects.

Calibration notes

Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 148 scored entries below, 14 tied, 64 above on Governance.

Linked evidence
  • context Wikimedia Foundation is a nonprofit that publishes financial reports for its public knowledge projects. [1]
  • context Wikimedia Foundation describes its mission as supporting free knowledge projects for the public. [2]
  • Wikimedia Foundation publishes reports, plans, and financial materials for public knowledge projects, but its nonprofit governance is not direct democracy by all users or article subjects. [4]
Extraction
?
Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.
8 / 10

Wikimedia Foundation is a nonprofit that publishes financial reports for its public knowledge projects.

Calibration notes

Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 173 scored entries below, 34 tied, 19 above on Extraction.

Linked evidence
  • context Wikimedia Foundation is a nonprofit that publishes financial reports for its public knowledge projects. [1]
  • context Wikimedia Foundation describes its mission as supporting free knowledge projects for the public. [2]
  • Wikimedia Foundation is a donor-funded 501(c)(3) nonprofit supporting free knowledge projects, so surplus is structurally routed to public knowledge infrastructure rather than owner profit. [5]
Labor Sovereignty
?
Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.
5 / 7

Wikimedia Foundation is a nonprofit that publishes financial reports for its public knowledge projects.

Calibration notes

Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 152 scored entries below, 40 tied, 34 above on Labor Sovereignty.

Linked evidence
  • context Wikimedia Foundation is a nonprofit that publishes financial reports for its public knowledge projects. [1]
  • context Wikimedia Foundation describes its mission as supporting free knowledge projects for the public. [2]
  • Wikimedia Foundation’s public reports show a nonprofit staff and volunteer ecosystem around free knowledge projects, but they do not establish worker control over the institution. [6]
Solidarity with the Unemployed
?
Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.
4 / 7

Wikimedia Foundation is a nonprofit that publishes financial reports for its public knowledge projects.

Calibration notes

Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 127 scored entries below, 30 tied, 69 above on Solidarity with the Unemployed.

Linked evidence
  • context Wikimedia Foundation is a nonprofit that publishes financial reports for its public knowledge projects. [1]
  • context Wikimedia Foundation describes its mission as supporting free knowledge projects for the public. [2]
  • Wikimedia Foundation supports free knowledge projects available to the public, making the core benefit accessible without employment status, subscription purchase, or school affiliation. [7]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity
?
Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.
5 / 7

Wikimedia Foundation is a nonprofit that publishes financial reports for its public knowledge projects.

Calibration notes

Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 119 scored entries below, 43 tied, 64 above on Loss-Bearing Fidelity.

Linked evidence
  • context Wikimedia Foundation is a nonprofit that publishes financial reports for its public knowledge projects. [1]
  • context Wikimedia Foundation describes its mission as supporting free knowledge projects for the public. [2]
  • Wikimedia Foundation uses donor-funded nonprofit finance and public reporting to maintain free knowledge infrastructure, absorbing operating costs without direct user fees. [8]
Market Conduct
?
Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.
5 / 5

Wikimedia Foundation describes its work as supporting free knowledge projects available to the public, which materially limits direct price and access extraction.

Calibration notes

Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 180 scored entries below, 46 tied, 0 above on Market Conduct.

Linked evidence
  • context Wikimedia Foundation is a nonprofit that publishes financial reports for its public knowledge projects. [1]
  • context Wikimedia Foundation describes its mission as supporting free knowledge projects for the public. [2]
  • Wikimedia Foundation describes its work as supporting free knowledge projects available to the public, which materially limits direct price and access extraction. [9]
Product Integrity
?
Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.
5 / 5

Wikimedia Foundation describes its mission as supporting free knowledge projects for the public.

Calibration notes

Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 134 scored entries below, 92 tied, 0 above on Product Integrity.

Linked evidence
  • Wikimedia Foundation describes its mission as supporting free knowledge projects for the public. [2]
Scale Integrity
?
Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.
5 / 5

Wikimedia Foundation is a nonprofit that publishes financial reports for its public knowledge projects.

Calibration notes

Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 191 scored entries below, 35 tied, 0 above on Scale Integrity.

Linked evidence
  • context Wikimedia Foundation is a nonprofit that publishes financial reports for its public knowledge projects. [1]
  • context Wikimedia Foundation describes its mission as supporting free knowledge projects for the public. [2]
  • Wikimedia Foundation supports globally used free knowledge projects and publishes key reports, making scale partly compatible with public access and accountability even though governance remains institutionally concentrated. [10]

Penalties

No penalties applied in this version.

Bonus Credits
Bonus Credit Why this credit
Good Deal
?
Credit for unusually fair value: durable quality, fair pricing, low lock-in, and clear customer surplus.
3 / 3

Wikimedia Foundation supports free knowledge projects available to the public, creating unusually high public user surplus at no direct price.

Calibration notes

Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 200 scored entries below, 26 tied, 0 above on Good Deal.

Linked evidence
  • Wikimedia Foundation supports free knowledge projects available to the public, creating unusually high public user surplus at no direct price. [12]
Cost Transparency
?
Credit for clear posted prices, all-in fees, unit costs, public rate cards, margin/cost visibility, or surplus-allocation transparency, especially in markets where opaque quotes, hidden fees, or individualized pricing are normal.
2 / 3

Wikimedia Foundation publishes financial reports, annual reports, audit reports, annual plans, and Form 990s for public review.

Calibration notes

Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 201 scored entries below, 12 tied, 13 above on Cost Transparency.

Linked evidence
  • Wikimedia Foundation publishes financial reports, annual reports, audit reports, annual plans, and Form 990s for public review. [13]

Confidence Basis

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

High 83/100

14 verified linked claims 11 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 11/11 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 16/20

14 verified linked claims

Source quality 15/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 14/18

11 direct claims across 11 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 10/10

11/11 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending
VerificationUnverified
ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.
Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.
1Wikimedia Foundation is a nonprofit that publishes financial reports for its public knowledge projects.

Accountability Opacity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed

2Wikimedia Foundation describes its mission as supporting free knowledge projects for the public.

Product Integrity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed

3Wikimedia Foundation states that it is a donor-funded U.S. 501(c)(3) nonprofit and publishes financial reports, audit reports, annual plans, and Form 990s.

Ownership Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

4Wikimedia Foundation publishes reports, plans, and financial materials for public knowledge projects, but its nonprofit governance is not direct democracy by all users or article subjects.

Governance Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed

5Wikimedia Foundation is a donor-funded 501(c)(3) nonprofit supporting free knowledge projects, so surplus is structurally routed to public knowledge infrastructure rather than owner profit.

Extraction Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed

6Wikimedia Foundation’s public reports show a nonprofit staff and volunteer ecosystem around free knowledge projects, but they do not establish worker control over the institution.

Labor Sovereignty Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed

7Wikimedia Foundation supports free knowledge projects available to the public, making the core benefit accessible without employment status, subscription purchase, or school affiliation.

Solidarity Unemployed Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed

8Wikimedia Foundation uses donor-funded nonprofit finance and public reporting to maintain free knowledge infrastructure, absorbing operating costs without direct user fees.

Loss Bearing Fidelity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed

9Wikimedia Foundation describes its work as supporting free knowledge projects available to the public, which materially limits direct price and access extraction.

Market Conduct Verified High confidence Human-reviewed

10Wikimedia Foundation supports globally used free knowledge projects and publishes key reports, making scale partly compatible with public access and accountability even though governance remains institutionally concentrated.

Scale Integrity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed

11Wikimedia Foundation publishes current annual-report and audit materials, strengthening accountability-opacity evidence for the public-knowledge evaluation.

Accountability Opacity Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

12Wikimedia Foundation supports free knowledge projects available to the public, creating unusually high public user surplus at no direct price.

Good Deal Verified High confidence Human-reviewed

13Wikimedia Foundation publishes financial reports, annual reports, audit reports, annual plans, and Form 990s for public review.

Cost Transparency Verified High confidence Human-reviewed

14Wikimedia Foundation's public materials state a mission, values, ownership model, advocacy role, or institutional standpoint plainly enough that this record does not identify penalty-level neutrality theater.

Ideological Disavowal Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

Alternatives

AGOOD60 tentative score Bookshare / Benetech nonprofit accessible-ebook library · same market AGOOD59 tentative score Creative Commons international nonprofit commons steward · same market AGOOD57 tentative score Internet Archive nonprofit digital library · same market AGOOD56 tentative score AK Press worker-owned independent book publisher and distributor · same market AGOOD55 tentative score Little Free Library nonprofit neighborhood book-sharing network · same market

Competitors

AGOOD60 tentative score Bookshare / Benetech nonprofit accessible-ebook library · same market AGOOD59 tentative score Creative Commons international nonprofit commons steward · same market AGOOD57 tentative score Internet Archive nonprofit digital library · same market AGOOD56 tentative score AK Press worker-owned independent book publisher and distributor · same market AGOOD55 tentative score Little Free Library nonprofit neighborhood book-sharing network · same market AGOOD54 tentative score Consumer Reports independent nonprofit member organization · same market BQUALIFIED48 tentative score Autonomous Press worker-owned independent book publisher · same market BQUALIFIED48 tentative score Bitterroot Books author- and worker-owned cooperative publisher · same market

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for Wikimedia Foundation Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

ai-scaffolding toxic-products-assessment

Added tentative AI-generated Toxic Products penalty 0 and directory value for current toxic, addictive, pesticide, livestock, chemical, or consumer-safety product exposure.

ai-scaffolding

Added stronger direct source-backed claims for public-interest evaluation quality. Score values were not changed in this pass.

View Full Audit Log