faith-linked development network

Aga Khan Development Network

A large Ismaili-linked development network working across health, education, culture, rural development, civil society, and economic development. It scores well because public-benefit service quality and institutional capacity are strong, while hereditary leadership and limited affected-stakeholder control keep it below democratic alternatives.

Why this matters: AKDN is a positive religiously linked development anchor with unusually broad service capacity.

Letter grade B Qualified High confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1 Last reviewed May 14, 2026

Final Score 49* B - Qualified

BQUALIFIED49 pts

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material50

Bonus+8

Cap66No structure cap

After Cap58

Penalties-9

!Not Verified

Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Evaluation Overview

B - Qualified

The score turns mainly on Extraction, with the largest penalty coming from Reversibility.

Strengths

Extraction8/10
Solidarity with the Unemployed7/7
Loss-Bearing Fidelity6/7

Penalties

Reversibility-5
Accountability Opacity-2
Identity Capture-1
Ideological Disavowal-1

Evidence state

ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Linked claims17
Direct axis claims17
Coverage17/17

Scoring Axes

Axis	Score	Why this score
Ownership ? Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.	5 / 10	Aga Khan Development Network sits at 5 on Ownership because AKDN is a mission-governed development network rather than an investor-owned firm, while ultimate authority still remains… Aga Khan Development Network sits at 5 on Ownership because AKDN is a mission-governed development network rather than an investor-owned firm, while ultimate authority still remains philanthropic and faith-linked rather than directly owned by affected communities. That is above closed hierarchies and commercial religious bodies, but below worker-controlled or democratically governed public-interest institutions. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Aga Khan Development Network is governed as an institutional religious body rather than by worker, member-consumer, or affected-community ownership. [1]
Governance ? Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.	5 / 10	Aga Khan Development Network sits at 5 on Governance because its agencies publish public development missions and operate through institutional nonprofit structures with substantial professional capacity. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence AKDN governance is philanthropic and faith-linked, with strategic authority tied to the Aga Khan and network institutions rather than direct affected-community ownership. [2]
Extraction ? Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.	8 / 10	Aga Khan Development Network sits at 8 on Extraction because aga Khan Development Network's resource flows depend on donations, institutional assets, dues, offerings, or affiliated service systems rather than democratic surplus return to affected people.. Aga Khan Development Network sits at 8 on Extraction because aga Khan Development Network's resource flows depend on donations, institutional assets, dues, offerings, or affiliated service systems rather than democratic surplus return to affected people.. That is above closed coercive movements when service or accountability is real, but below democratic, worker-controlled, or directly affected-stakeholder institutions. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Aga Khan Development Network's resource flows depend on donations, institutional assets, dues, offerings, or affiliated service systems rather than democratic surplus return to affected people. [3]
Labor Sovereignty ? Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.	5 / 7	Aga Khan Development Network sits at 5 on Labor Sovereignty because aga Khan Development Network's clergy, staff, volunteers, or members operate inside religious authority structures with… Aga Khan Development Network sits at 5 on Labor Sovereignty because aga Khan Development Network's clergy, staff, volunteers, or members operate inside religious authority structures with limited worker sovereignty compared with co-determined or worker-owned institutions.. That is above closed coercive movements when service or accountability is real, but below democratic, worker-controlled, or directly affected-stakeholder institutions. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Aga Khan Development Network's clergy, staff, volunteers, or members operate inside religious authority structures with limited worker sovereignty compared with co-determined or worker-owned institutions. [4]
Solidarity with the Unemployed ? Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.	7 / 7	Aga Khan Development Network sits at 7 on Solidarity Unemployed because aga Khan Development Network's public record shows some ministry, charity, or mutual-aid orientation, but not a universal structural guarantee for people outside paid work.. Aga Khan Development Network sits at 7 on Solidarity Unemployed because aga Khan Development Network's public record shows some ministry, charity, or mutual-aid orientation, but not a universal structural guarantee for people outside paid work.. That is above closed coercive movements when service or accountability is real, but below democratic, worker-controlled, or directly affected-stakeholder institutions. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Aga Khan Development Network's public record shows some ministry, charity, or mutual-aid orientation, but not a universal structural guarantee for people outside paid work. [5]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity ? Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.	6 / 7	Aga Khan Development Network sits at 6 on Loss Bearing Fidelity because aga Khan Development Network's mission language and public-service work show some willingness to absorb cost for values, while accountability still depends on institutional discretion.. Aga Khan Development Network sits at 6 on Loss Bearing Fidelity because aga Khan Development Network's mission language and public-service work show some willingness to absorb cost for values, while accountability still depends on institutional discretion.. That is above closed coercive movements when service or accountability is real, but below democratic, worker-controlled, or directly affected-stakeholder institutions. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Aga Khan Development Network's mission language and public-service work show some willingness to absorb cost for values, while accountability still depends on institutional discretion. [6]
Market Conduct ? Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.	4 / 5	Aga Khan Development Network sits at 4 on Market Conduct because aga Khan Development Network is not an ordinary seller, but it controls access to religious community, services, identity, donations, or institutional recognition.. Aga Khan Development Network sits at 4 on Market Conduct because aga Khan Development Network is not an ordinary seller, but it controls access to religious community, services, identity, donations, or institutional recognition.. That is above closed coercive movements when service or accountability is real, but below democratic, worker-controlled, or directly affected-stakeholder institutions. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Aga Khan Development Network is not an ordinary seller, but it controls access to religious community, services, identity, donations, or institutional recognition. [7]
Product Integrity ? Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.	5 / 5	Aga Khan Development Network sits at 5 on Product Integrity because aKDN provides health, education, culture, rural development, civil-society, and economic-development services with… Aga Khan Development Network sits at 5 on Product Integrity because aKDN provides health, education, culture, rural development, civil-society, and economic-development services with unusually high practical product integrity for a religiously linked institution.. That is above closed coercive movements when service or accountability is real, but below democratic, worker-controlled, or directly affected-stakeholder institutions. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence AKDN provides health, education, culture, rural development, civil-society, and economic-development services with unusually high practical product integrity for a religiously linked institution. [8]
Scale Integrity ? Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.	5 / 5	Aga Khan Development Network sits at 5 on Scale Integrity because aga Khan Development Network's scale gives it public importance and service capacity, while also magnifying hierarchy, opacity, and identity pressure.. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Aga Khan Development Network's scale gives it public importance and service capacity, while also magnifying hierarchy, opacity, and identity pressure. [9]

Penalties

Penalty	Applied	Why this penalty
Reversibility ? Applied when positive conduct depends on current living leaders, founders, family owners, or other person-contingent governance rather than durable structure. Range: -5 to 0.	-5	Aga Khan Development Network is penalized at -5 on Reversibility because aga Khan Development Network's positive conduct depends on present leadership, doctrine, boards, religious culture,… Aga Khan Development Network is penalized at -5 on Reversibility because aga Khan Development Network's positive conduct depends on present leadership, doctrine, boards, religious culture, or discretionary institutional practice rather than locked affected-stakeholder control.. The value is calibrated against nearby religious institutions rather than against unrelated commercial firms, so ordinary belief or worship is not treated as the offense. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Aga Khan Development Network's positive conduct depends on present leadership, doctrine, boards, religious culture, or discretionary institutional practice rather than locked affected-stakeholder control. [14]
Accountability Opacity ? Material opacity, reputation laundering, or hidden accountability structures that prevent public accountability. Range: -2 to 0.	-2	Aga Khan Development Network is penalized at -2 on Accountability Opacity because aga Khan Development Network's public accountability is limited by religious hierarchy, internal processes,… Aga Khan Development Network is penalized at -2 on Accountability Opacity because aga Khan Development Network's public accountability is limited by religious hierarchy, internal processes, donor opacity, abuse-reporting gaps, or incomplete financial transparency.. The value is calibrated against nearby religious institutions rather than against unrelated commercial firms, so ordinary belief or worship is not treated as the offense. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Aga Khan Development Network's public accountability is limited by religious hierarchy, internal processes, donor opacity, abuse-reporting gaps, or incomplete financial transparency. [15]
Identity Capture ? Customer pressure, employee pressure, and pervasive identity saturation. Range: -3 to 0.	-1	Aga Khan Development Network is penalized at -1 on Identity Capture because aKDN has a faith-linked identity, but its service delivery is comparatively outward-facing and less coercive than membership-centered religious systems.. Aga Khan Development Network is penalized at -1 on Identity Capture because aKDN has a faith-linked identity, but its service delivery is comparatively outward-facing and less coercive than membership-centered religious systems.. The value is calibrated against nearby religious institutions rather than against unrelated commercial firms, so ordinary belief or worship is not treated as the offense. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence AKDN has a faith-linked identity, but its service delivery is comparatively outward-facing and less coercive than membership-centered religious systems. [16]
Ideological Disavowal ? Concealed ideology presented as neutrality, expertise, professional necessity, public-service administration, market inevitability, or non-ideological common sense while exercising power. Range: -3 to 0.	-1	Aga Khan Development Network is penalized at -1 on Ideological Disavowal because aga Khan Development Network presents religious or moral authority as truth, service, tradition, or neutrality in ways that can obscure its institutional standpoint and power.. Aga Khan Development Network is penalized at -1 on Ideological Disavowal because aga Khan Development Network presents religious or moral authority as truth, service, tradition, or neutrality in ways that can obscure its institutional standpoint and power.. The value is calibrated against nearby religious institutions rather than against unrelated commercial firms, so ordinary belief or worship is not treated as the offense. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Aga Khan Development Network presents religious or moral authority as truth, service, tradition, or neutrality in ways that can obscure its institutional standpoint and power. [17]

Bonus Credits

Bonus	Credit	Why this credit
Openness to Dissent ? Credit for tolerating internal, user, customer, worker, and public dissent without retaliation, capture, or viewpoint laundering.	1 / 3	Aga Khan Development Network gets limited positive credit on Openness To Dissent because aga Khan Development Network's public structures provide some channels for criticism or reform, but… Aga Khan Development Network gets limited positive credit on Openness To Dissent because aga Khan Development Network's public structures provide some channels for criticism or reform, but dissent remains bounded by religious authority and institutional control.. The value stays modest unless the practice is durable, externally legible, and stronger than ordinary nonprofit or religious self-presentation. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Aga Khan Development Network's public structures provide some channels for criticism or reform, but dissent remains bounded by religious authority and institutional control. [10]
Constitutional Spirit ? Credit for respecting constitutional rights and civil-liberties norms even where private law does not strictly require it.	2 / 3	Aga Khan Development Network gets limited positive credit on Constitutional Spirit because aga Khan Development Network's public work includes some civil-society value, but internal… Aga Khan Development Network gets limited positive credit on Constitutional Spirit because aga Khan Development Network's public work includes some civil-society value, but internal religious governance is not equivalent to public constitutional accountability.. The value stays modest unless the practice is durable, externally legible, and stronger than ordinary nonprofit or religious self-presentation. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Aga Khan Development Network's public work includes some civil-society value, but internal religious governance is not equivalent to public constitutional accountability. [11]
Good Deal ? Credit for unusually fair value: durable quality, fair pricing, low lock-in, and clear customer surplus.	3 / 3	Aga Khan Development Network gets limited positive credit on Good Deal because aga Khan Development Network provides community, services, aid, education, advocacy, or spiritual goods that can have practical value outside ordinary market exchange.. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Aga Khan Development Network provides community, services, aid, education, advocacy, or spiritual goods that can have practical value outside ordinary market exchange. [12]
Cost Transparency ? Credit for clear posted prices, all-in fees, unit costs, public rate cards, margin/cost visibility, or surplus-allocation transparency, especially in markets where opaque quotes, hidden fees, or individualized pricing are normal.	2 / 3	Aga Khan Development Network gets limited positive credit on Cost Transparency because aga Khan Development Network's public materials disclose some institutional information, but… Aga Khan Development Network gets limited positive credit on Cost Transparency because aga Khan Development Network's public materials disclose some institutional information, but donations, assets, internal costs, or affiliated finances are not fully transparent to affected people.. The value stays modest unless the practice is durable, externally legible, and stronger than ordinary nonprofit or religious self-presentation. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Aga Khan Development Network's public materials disclose some institutional information, but donations, assets, internal costs, or affiliated finances are not fully transparent to affected people. [13]

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

High 83/100

17 verified linked claims 17 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 17/17 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 20/20

17 verified linked claims

Source quality 10/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 14/18

17 direct claims across 17 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 14, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 10/10

17/17 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending

VerificationUnverified

ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)

ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)

Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.

Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

1Aga Khan Development Network is governed as an institutional religious body rather than by worker, member-consumer, or affected-community ownership.

Ownership Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Aga Khan Development NetworkGeneral web source · 58%
AKDN agenciesGeneral web source · 58%
AKDN annual reviewGeneral web source · 58%

2AKDN governance is philanthropic and faith-linked, with strategic authority tied to the Aga Khan and network institutions rather than direct affected-community ownership.

Governance Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Aga Khan Development NetworkGeneral web source · 58%
AKDN agenciesGeneral web source · 58%
AKDN annual reviewGeneral web source · 58%

3Aga Khan Development Network's resource flows depend on donations, institutional assets, dues, offerings, or affiliated service systems rather than democratic surplus return to affected people.

Extraction Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Aga Khan Development NetworkGeneral web source · 58%
AKDN agenciesGeneral web source · 58%
AKDN annual reviewGeneral web source · 58%

4Aga Khan Development Network's clergy, staff, volunteers, or members operate inside religious authority structures with limited worker sovereignty compared with co-determined or worker-owned institutions.

Labor Sovereignty Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Aga Khan Development NetworkGeneral web source · 58%
AKDN agenciesGeneral web source · 58%
AKDN annual reviewGeneral web source · 58%

5Aga Khan Development Network's public record shows some ministry, charity, or mutual-aid orientation, but not a universal structural guarantee for people outside paid work.

Solidarity Unemployed Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Aga Khan Development NetworkGeneral web source · 58%
AKDN agenciesGeneral web source · 58%
AKDN annual reviewGeneral web source · 58%

6Aga Khan Development Network's mission language and public-service work show some willingness to absorb cost for values, while accountability still depends on institutional discretion.

Loss Bearing Fidelity Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Aga Khan Development NetworkGeneral web source · 58%
AKDN agenciesGeneral web source · 58%
AKDN annual reviewGeneral web source · 58%

7Aga Khan Development Network is not an ordinary seller, but it controls access to religious community, services, identity, donations, or institutional recognition.

Market Conduct Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Aga Khan Development NetworkGeneral web source · 58%
AKDN agenciesGeneral web source · 58%
AKDN annual reviewGeneral web source · 58%

8AKDN provides health, education, culture, rural development, civil-society, and economic-development services with unusually high practical product integrity for a religiously linked institution.

Product Integrity Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Aga Khan Development NetworkGeneral web source · 58%
AKDN agenciesGeneral web source · 58%
AKDN annual reviewGeneral web source · 58%

9Aga Khan Development Network's scale gives it public importance and service capacity, while also magnifying hierarchy, opacity, and identity pressure.

Scale Integrity Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Aga Khan Development NetworkGeneral web source · 58%
AKDN agenciesGeneral web source · 58%
AKDN annual reviewGeneral web source · 58%

10Aga Khan Development Network's public structures provide some channels for criticism or reform, but dissent remains bounded by religious authority and institutional control.

Openness To Dissent Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Aga Khan Development NetworkGeneral web source · 58%
AKDN agenciesGeneral web source · 58%
AKDN annual reviewGeneral web source · 58%

11Aga Khan Development Network's public work includes some civil-society value, but internal religious governance is not equivalent to public constitutional accountability.

Constitutional Spirit Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Aga Khan Development NetworkGeneral web source · 58%
AKDN agenciesGeneral web source · 58%
AKDN annual reviewGeneral web source · 58%

12Aga Khan Development Network provides community, services, aid, education, advocacy, or spiritual goods that can have practical value outside ordinary market exchange.

Good Deal Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Aga Khan Development NetworkGeneral web source · 58%
AKDN agenciesGeneral web source · 58%
AKDN annual reviewGeneral web source · 58%

13Aga Khan Development Network's public materials disclose some institutional information, but donations, assets, internal costs, or affiliated finances are not fully transparent to affected people.

Cost Transparency Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Aga Khan Development NetworkGeneral web source · 58%
AKDN agenciesGeneral web source · 58%
AKDN annual reviewGeneral web source · 58%

14Aga Khan Development Network's positive conduct depends on present leadership, doctrine, boards, religious culture, or discretionary institutional practice rather than locked affected-stakeholder control.

Reversibility Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Aga Khan Development NetworkGeneral web source · 58%
AKDN agenciesGeneral web source · 58%
AKDN annual reviewGeneral web source · 58%

15Aga Khan Development Network's public accountability is limited by religious hierarchy, internal processes, donor opacity, abuse-reporting gaps, or incomplete financial transparency.

Accountability Opacity Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Aga Khan Development NetworkGeneral web source · 58%
AKDN agenciesGeneral web source · 58%
AKDN annual reviewGeneral web source · 58%

16AKDN has a faith-linked identity, but its service delivery is comparatively outward-facing and less coercive than membership-centered religious systems.

Identity Capture Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Aga Khan Development NetworkGeneral web source · 58%
AKDN agenciesGeneral web source · 58%
AKDN annual reviewGeneral web source · 58%

17Aga Khan Development Network presents religious or moral authority as truth, service, tradition, or neutrality in ways that can obscure its institutional standpoint and power.

Ideological Disavowal Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Aga Khan Development NetworkGeneral web source · 58%
AKDN agenciesGeneral web source · 58%
AKDN annual reviewGeneral web source · 58%

Alternatives

AGOOD57 Catholic Worker Movement decentralized hospitality movement · same market AGOOD57 Mennonite Central Committee peace church relief organization · same market AGOOD60 Friends General Conference Quaker religious nonprofit · United States AGOOD52 Sikh Coalition faith-based civil-rights nonprofit · United States

Competitors

AGOOD57 Catholic Worker Movement decentralized hospitality movement · same market AGOOD57 Mennonite Central Committee peace church relief organization · same market BQUALIFIED49 Tzu Chi Foundation Buddhist humanitarian foundation · same market BQUALIFIED47 Islamic Relief Worldwide faith-based humanitarian NGO · same market BQUALIFIED44 World Council of Churches ecumenical church fellowship · same market DEXTRACTIVE13 Al-Azhar Islamic university and authority · same market DEXTRACTIVE12 The Salvation Army religious charity · same market FMALIGNANT-2 Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints global hierarchical church · same market

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for Aga Khan Development Network Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.

View Full Audit Log