Buddhist humanitarian foundation

Tzu Chi Foundation

A Buddhist humanitarian foundation known for disaster relief, medical care, recycling, education, and volunteer service. It scores well because its service model is materially beneficial and comparatively low-extraction, though founder-linked culture and religious identity prevent a top structural score.

Why this matters: Tzu Chi is a major Buddhist positive anchor for disciplined humanitarian service.

Letter grade B Qualified High confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1 Last reviewed May 14, 2026

Final Score 49* B - Qualified

BQUALIFIED49 pts

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material50

Bonus+9

Cap66No structure cap

After Cap59

Penalties-10

!Not Verified

Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Evaluation Overview

B - Qualified

The score turns mainly on Extraction, with the largest penalty coming from Reversibility.

Strengths

Extraction8/10
Solidarity with the Unemployed7/7
Loss-Bearing Fidelity6/7

Penalties

Reversibility-5
Accountability Opacity-2
Identity Capture-2
Ideological Disavowal-1

Evidence state

ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Linked claims18
Direct axis claims18
Coverage18/18

Scoring Axes

Axis	Score	Why this score
Ownership ? Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.	5 / 10	Tzu Chi Foundation sits at 5 on Ownership because tzu Chi Foundation is governed as an institutional religious body rather than by worker, member-consumer, or affected-community ownership.. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Tzu Chi Foundation is governed as an institutional religious body rather than by worker, member-consumer, or affected-community ownership. [1]
Governance ? Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.	5 / 10	Tzu Chi Foundation sits at 5 on Governance because tzu Chi Foundation governance is nonprofit and volunteer-driven, but ultimate institutional culture is still founder-linked and not direct affected-community ownership.. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Tzu Chi Foundation governance is nonprofit and volunteer-driven, but ultimate institutional culture is still founder-linked and not direct affected-community ownership. [2]
Extraction ? Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.	8 / 10	Tzu Chi Foundation sits at 8 on Extraction because tzu Chi Foundation's resource flows depend on donations, institutional assets, dues, offerings, or affiliated service systems rather than democratic surplus return to affected people.. Tzu Chi Foundation sits at 8 on Extraction because tzu Chi Foundation's resource flows depend on donations, institutional assets, dues, offerings, or affiliated service systems rather than democratic surplus return to affected people.. That is above closed coercive movements when service or accountability is real, but below democratic, worker-controlled, or directly affected-stakeholder institutions. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Tzu Chi Foundation's resource flows depend on donations, institutional assets, dues, offerings, or affiliated service systems rather than democratic surplus return to affected people. [3]
Labor Sovereignty ? Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.	5 / 7	Tzu Chi Foundation sits at 5 on Labor Sovereignty because tzu Chi Foundation's clergy, staff, volunteers, or members operate inside religious authority structures with limited worker sovereignty compared with co-determined or worker-owned institutions.. Tzu Chi Foundation sits at 5 on Labor Sovereignty because tzu Chi Foundation's clergy, staff, volunteers, or members operate inside religious authority structures with limited worker sovereignty compared with co-determined or worker-owned institutions.. That is above closed coercive movements when service or accountability is real, but below democratic, worker-controlled, or directly affected-stakeholder institutions. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Tzu Chi Foundation's clergy, staff, volunteers, or members operate inside religious authority structures with limited worker sovereignty compared with co-determined or worker-owned institutions. [4]
Solidarity with the Unemployed ? Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.	7 / 7	Tzu Chi Foundation sits at 7 on Solidarity Unemployed because tzu Chi Foundation's public record shows some ministry, charity, or mutual-aid orientation, but not a universal structural guarantee for people outside paid work.. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Tzu Chi Foundation's public record shows some ministry, charity, or mutual-aid orientation, but not a universal structural guarantee for people outside paid work. [5]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity ? Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.	6 / 7	Tzu Chi Foundation sits at 6 on Loss Bearing Fidelity because tzu Chi Foundation's mission language and public-service work show some willingness to absorb cost for values, while accountability still depends on institutional discretion.. Tzu Chi Foundation sits at 6 on Loss Bearing Fidelity because tzu Chi Foundation's mission language and public-service work show some willingness to absorb cost for values, while accountability still depends on institutional discretion.. That is above closed coercive movements when service or accountability is real, but below democratic, worker-controlled, or directly affected-stakeholder institutions. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Tzu Chi Foundation's mission language and public-service work show some willingness to absorb cost for values, while accountability still depends on institutional discretion. [6]
Market Conduct ? Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.	4 / 5	Tzu Chi Foundation sits at 4 on Market Conduct because tzu Chi Foundation is not an ordinary seller, but it controls access to religious community, services, identity, donations, or institutional recognition.. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Tzu Chi Foundation is not an ordinary seller, but it controls access to religious community, services, identity, donations, or institutional recognition. [7]
Product Integrity ? Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.	5 / 5	Tzu Chi Foundation sits at 5 on Product Integrity because tzu Chi Foundation provides disaster relief, hospitals, education, recycling, and volunteer mobilization with strong practical value.. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Tzu Chi Foundation provides disaster relief, hospitals, education, recycling, and volunteer mobilization with strong practical value. [8]
Scale Integrity ? Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.	5 / 5	Tzu Chi Foundation sits at 5 on Scale Integrity because tzu Chi Foundation's scale gives it public importance and service capacity, while also magnifying hierarchy, opacity, and identity pressure.. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Tzu Chi Foundation's scale gives it public importance and service capacity, while also magnifying hierarchy, opacity, and identity pressure. [9]

Penalties

Penalty	Applied	Why this penalty
Reversibility ? Applied when positive conduct depends on current living leaders, founders, family owners, or other person-contingent governance rather than durable structure. Range: -5 to 0.	-5	Tzu Chi Foundation is penalized at -5 on Reversibility because tzu Chi Foundation's positive conduct depends on present leadership, doctrine, boards, religious culture, or discretionary institutional practice rather than locked affected-stakeholder control.. Tzu Chi Foundation is penalized at -5 on Reversibility because tzu Chi Foundation's positive conduct depends on present leadership, doctrine, boards, religious culture, or discretionary institutional practice rather than locked affected-stakeholder control.. The value is calibrated against nearby religious institutions rather than against unrelated commercial firms, so ordinary belief or worship is not treated as the offense. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Tzu Chi Foundation's positive conduct depends on present leadership, doctrine, boards, religious culture, or discretionary institutional practice rather than locked affected-stakeholder control. [15]
Accountability Opacity ? Material opacity, reputation laundering, or hidden accountability structures that prevent public accountability. Range: -2 to 0.	-2	Tzu Chi Foundation is penalized at -2 on Accountability Opacity because tzu Chi Foundation's public accountability is limited by religious hierarchy, internal processes, donor opacity, abuse-reporting gaps, or incomplete financial transparency.. Tzu Chi Foundation is penalized at -2 on Accountability Opacity because tzu Chi Foundation's public accountability is limited by religious hierarchy, internal processes, donor opacity, abuse-reporting gaps, or incomplete financial transparency.. The value is calibrated against nearby religious institutions rather than against unrelated commercial firms, so ordinary belief or worship is not treated as the offense. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Tzu Chi Foundation's public accountability is limited by religious hierarchy, internal processes, donor opacity, abuse-reporting gaps, or incomplete financial transparency. [16]
Identity Capture ? Customer pressure, employee pressure, and pervasive identity saturation. Range: -3 to 0.	-2	Tzu Chi Foundation is penalized at -2 on Identity Capture because tzu Chi carries moderate identity capture through disciplined Buddhist volunteer culture, but its outward humanitarian practice is less coercive than high-control religious membership systems.. Tzu Chi Foundation is penalized at -2 on Identity Capture because tzu Chi carries moderate identity capture through disciplined Buddhist volunteer culture, but its outward humanitarian practice is less coercive than high-control religious membership systems.. The value is calibrated against nearby religious institutions rather than against unrelated commercial firms, so ordinary belief or worship is not treated as the offense. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Tzu Chi carries moderate identity capture through disciplined Buddhist volunteer culture, but its outward humanitarian practice is less coercive than high-control religious membership systems. [17]
Ideological Disavowal ? Concealed ideology presented as neutrality, expertise, professional necessity, public-service administration, market inevitability, or non-ideological common sense while exercising power. Range: -3 to 0.	-1	Tzu Chi Foundation is penalized at -1 on Ideological Disavowal because tzu Chi Foundation presents religious or moral authority as truth, service, tradition, or neutrality in ways that can obscure its institutional standpoint and power.. Tzu Chi Foundation is penalized at -1 on Ideological Disavowal because tzu Chi Foundation presents religious or moral authority as truth, service, tradition, or neutrality in ways that can obscure its institutional standpoint and power.. The value is calibrated against nearby religious institutions rather than against unrelated commercial firms, so ordinary belief or worship is not treated as the offense. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Tzu Chi Foundation presents religious or moral authority as truth, service, tradition, or neutrality in ways that can obscure its institutional standpoint and power. [18]

Bonus Credits

Bonus	Credit	Why this credit
Openness to Dissent ? Credit for tolerating internal, user, customer, worker, and public dissent without retaliation, capture, or viewpoint laundering.	1 / 3	Tzu Chi Foundation gets limited positive credit on Openness To Dissent because tzu Chi Foundation's public structures provide some channels for criticism or reform, but dissent remains bounded by religious authority and institutional control.. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Tzu Chi Foundation's public structures provide some channels for criticism or reform, but dissent remains bounded by religious authority and institutional control. [10]
Constitutional Spirit ? Credit for respecting constitutional rights and civil-liberties norms even where private law does not strictly require it.	2 / 3	Tzu Chi Foundation gets limited positive credit on Constitutional Spirit because tzu Chi Foundation's public work includes some civil-society value, but internal religious governance is not equivalent to public constitutional accountability.. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Tzu Chi Foundation's public work includes some civil-society value, but internal religious governance is not equivalent to public constitutional accountability. [11]
Good Deal ? Credit for unusually fair value: durable quality, fair pricing, low lock-in, and clear customer surplus.	3 / 3	Tzu Chi Foundation gets limited positive credit on Good Deal because tzu Chi Foundation provides community, services, aid, education, advocacy, or spiritual goods that can have practical value outside ordinary market exchange.. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Tzu Chi Foundation provides community, services, aid, education, advocacy, or spiritual goods that can have practical value outside ordinary market exchange. [12]
Cost Transparency ? Credit for clear posted prices, all-in fees, unit costs, public rate cards, margin/cost visibility, or surplus-allocation transparency, especially in markets where opaque quotes, hidden fees, or individualized pricing are normal.	2 / 3	Tzu Chi Foundation gets limited positive credit on Cost Transparency because tzu Chi Foundation's public materials disclose some institutional information, but donations, assets, internal… Tzu Chi Foundation gets limited positive credit on Cost Transparency because tzu Chi Foundation's public materials disclose some institutional information, but donations, assets, internal costs, or affiliated finances are not fully transparent to affected people.. The value stays modest unless the practice is durable, externally legible, and stronger than ordinary nonprofit or religious self-presentation. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Tzu Chi Foundation's public materials disclose some institutional information, but donations, assets, internal costs, or affiliated finances are not fully transparent to affected people. [13]
Anti-Scapegoating Culture ? Credit for documented non-punitive practices that prevent scapegoating, mobbing, and isolate-and-expel dynamics. Ordinary civility, peer support, or anti-bullying branding is not enough; the practice must also avoid public shaming, punitive pile-ons, and scapegoating of alleged scapegoaters.	1 / 3	Tzu Chi Foundation gets limited positive credit on Anti Scapegoating Culture because tzu Chi Foundation's current record does not document a robust, non-punitive anti-scapegoating practice strong enough for credit on this axis.. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Major religious institutions pass calibrated across hierarchical churches, high-control movements, humanitarian religious nonprofits, religious nationalism, cultic violence, and historical religious-state coercion. Linked evidence Tzu Chi Foundation's current record does not document a robust, non-punitive anti-scapegoating practice strong enough for credit on this axis. [14]

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

High 83/100

18 verified linked claims 18 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 18/18 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 20/20

18 verified linked claims

Source quality 10/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 14/18

18 direct claims across 18 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 14, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 10/10

18/18 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending

VerificationUnverified

ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)

ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)

Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.

Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

1Tzu Chi Foundation is governed as an institutional religious body rather than by worker, member-consumer, or affected-community ownership.

Ownership Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Tzu Chi FoundationGeneral web source · 58%
Tzu Chi USAGeneral web source · 58%
Tzu Chi missionsGeneral web source · 58%

2Tzu Chi Foundation governance is nonprofit and volunteer-driven, but ultimate institutional culture is still founder-linked and not direct affected-community ownership.

Governance Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Tzu Chi FoundationGeneral web source · 58%
Tzu Chi USAGeneral web source · 58%
Tzu Chi missionsGeneral web source · 58%

3Tzu Chi Foundation's resource flows depend on donations, institutional assets, dues, offerings, or affiliated service systems rather than democratic surplus return to affected people.

Extraction Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Tzu Chi FoundationGeneral web source · 58%
Tzu Chi USAGeneral web source · 58%
Tzu Chi missionsGeneral web source · 58%

4Tzu Chi Foundation's clergy, staff, volunteers, or members operate inside religious authority structures with limited worker sovereignty compared with co-determined or worker-owned institutions.

Labor Sovereignty Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Tzu Chi FoundationGeneral web source · 58%
Tzu Chi USAGeneral web source · 58%
Tzu Chi missionsGeneral web source · 58%

5Tzu Chi Foundation's public record shows some ministry, charity, or mutual-aid orientation, but not a universal structural guarantee for people outside paid work.

Solidarity Unemployed Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Tzu Chi FoundationGeneral web source · 58%
Tzu Chi USAGeneral web source · 58%
Tzu Chi missionsGeneral web source · 58%

6Tzu Chi Foundation's mission language and public-service work show some willingness to absorb cost for values, while accountability still depends on institutional discretion.

Loss Bearing Fidelity Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Tzu Chi FoundationGeneral web source · 58%
Tzu Chi USAGeneral web source · 58%
Tzu Chi missionsGeneral web source · 58%

7Tzu Chi Foundation is not an ordinary seller, but it controls access to religious community, services, identity, donations, or institutional recognition.

Market Conduct Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Tzu Chi FoundationGeneral web source · 58%
Tzu Chi USAGeneral web source · 58%
Tzu Chi missionsGeneral web source · 58%

8Tzu Chi Foundation provides disaster relief, hospitals, education, recycling, and volunteer mobilization with strong practical value.

Product Integrity Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Tzu Chi FoundationGeneral web source · 58%
Tzu Chi USAGeneral web source · 58%
Tzu Chi missionsGeneral web source · 58%

9Tzu Chi Foundation's scale gives it public importance and service capacity, while also magnifying hierarchy, opacity, and identity pressure.

Scale Integrity Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Tzu Chi FoundationGeneral web source · 58%
Tzu Chi USAGeneral web source · 58%
Tzu Chi missionsGeneral web source · 58%

10Tzu Chi Foundation's public structures provide some channels for criticism or reform, but dissent remains bounded by religious authority and institutional control.

Openness To Dissent Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Tzu Chi FoundationGeneral web source · 58%
Tzu Chi USAGeneral web source · 58%
Tzu Chi missionsGeneral web source · 58%

11Tzu Chi Foundation's public work includes some civil-society value, but internal religious governance is not equivalent to public constitutional accountability.

Constitutional Spirit Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Tzu Chi FoundationGeneral web source · 58%
Tzu Chi USAGeneral web source · 58%
Tzu Chi missionsGeneral web source · 58%

12Tzu Chi Foundation provides community, services, aid, education, advocacy, or spiritual goods that can have practical value outside ordinary market exchange.

Good Deal Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Tzu Chi FoundationGeneral web source · 58%
Tzu Chi USAGeneral web source · 58%
Tzu Chi missionsGeneral web source · 58%

13Tzu Chi Foundation's public materials disclose some institutional information, but donations, assets, internal costs, or affiliated finances are not fully transparent to affected people.

Cost Transparency Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Tzu Chi FoundationGeneral web source · 58%
Tzu Chi USAGeneral web source · 58%
Tzu Chi missionsGeneral web source · 58%

14Tzu Chi Foundation's current record does not document a robust, non-punitive anti-scapegoating practice strong enough for credit on this axis.

Anti Scapegoating Culture Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Tzu Chi FoundationGeneral web source · 58%
Tzu Chi USAGeneral web source · 58%
Tzu Chi missionsGeneral web source · 58%

15Tzu Chi Foundation's positive conduct depends on present leadership, doctrine, boards, religious culture, or discretionary institutional practice rather than locked affected-stakeholder control.

Reversibility Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Tzu Chi FoundationGeneral web source · 58%
Tzu Chi USAGeneral web source · 58%
Tzu Chi missionsGeneral web source · 58%

16Tzu Chi Foundation's public accountability is limited by religious hierarchy, internal processes, donor opacity, abuse-reporting gaps, or incomplete financial transparency.

Accountability Opacity Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Tzu Chi FoundationGeneral web source · 58%
Tzu Chi USAGeneral web source · 58%
Tzu Chi missionsGeneral web source · 58%

17Tzu Chi carries moderate identity capture through disciplined Buddhist volunteer culture, but its outward humanitarian practice is less coercive than high-control religious membership systems.

Identity Capture Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Tzu Chi FoundationGeneral web source · 58%
Tzu Chi USAGeneral web source · 58%
Tzu Chi missionsGeneral web source · 58%

18Tzu Chi Foundation presents religious or moral authority as truth, service, tradition, or neutrality in ways that can obscure its institutional standpoint and power.

Ideological Disavowal Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 14, 2026

AI scaffold

Tzu Chi FoundationGeneral web source · 58%
Tzu Chi USAGeneral web source · 58%
Tzu Chi missionsGeneral web source · 58%

Alternatives

AGOOD57 Catholic Worker Movement decentralized hospitality movement · same market AGOOD57 Mennonite Central Committee peace church relief organization · same market AGOOD60 Friends General Conference Quaker religious nonprofit · United States AGOOD52 Sikh Coalition faith-based civil-rights nonprofit · United States

Competitors

AGOOD57 Catholic Worker Movement decentralized hospitality movement · same market AGOOD57 Mennonite Central Committee peace church relief organization · same market BQUALIFIED49 Aga Khan Development Network faith-linked development network · same market BQUALIFIED47 Islamic Relief Worldwide faith-based humanitarian NGO · same market BQUALIFIED44 World Council of Churches ecumenical church fellowship · same market DEXTRACTIVE13 Al-Azhar Islamic university and authority · same market DEXTRACTIVE12 The Salvation Army religious charity · same market FMALIGNANT-2 Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints global hierarchical church · same market

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for Tzu Chi Foundation Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.

View Full Audit Log