public company

Alphabet / Google

A public search, ads, cloud, Android, and AI company built around attention infrastructure, found liable for maintaining search monopoly power. Alphabet / Google remains weak because of youth capture, surveillance capture, and identity capture, even where the product or service has practical value.

Why this matters: Search and advertising infrastructure can shape markets, knowledge access, and identity capture at scale.

Letter grade D Extractive High confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1 Last reviewed May 6, 2026

Final Score 2* D - Extractive

DEXTRACTIVE2 pts

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material27

Bonus+0

Cap35Ownership <= 2 and Governance <= 2

After Cap27

Penalties-25

Private Government badge

Alphabet / Google receives the Private Government badge because it combines large-scale private rule-setting over customers, workers, users, members, or counterparties with OpenLobby-documented lobbying of about $1.6M on public policy issues.

Evidence: [16]

Policy Capture: L for Lobbying

The L badge appears when the Policy Capture penalty is severe. Here, L stands for Lobbying: the policy-capture value is -8, meaning the evidence indicates major private-interest lobbying or policy pressure against workers, customers, citizens, affected communities, democratic accountability, or ecological life.

Evidence: [15]

!Not Verified

Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Evaluation Overview

D - Extractive

The score turns mainly on Extraction, with the largest penalty coming from Policy Capture.

Strengths

Extraction6/10
Labor Sovereignty4/7
Loss-Bearing Fidelity4/7

Penalties

Policy Capture-8
Youth Capture-5
Surveillance Capture-4
Identity Capture-3

Evidence state

ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Linked claims16
Direct axis claims15
Coverage15/15

Scoring Axes

Axis	Score	Why this score
Ownership ? Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.	2 / 10	Alphabet is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. Alphabet is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. That keeps Alphabet / Google low on Ownership: decisive control remains with shareholders, private owners, executives, or state insiders rather than affected people. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 78 scored entries below, 21 tied, 127 above on Ownership. Linked evidence Alphabet is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. [1]
Governance ? Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.	2 / 10	Alphabet is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 71 scored entries below, 22 tied, 133 above on Governance. Linked evidence context Alphabet is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. [1] context A federal court found Google liable for maintaining monopoly power in general search and text advertising markets. [2] Alphabet’s annual report and investor structure show a public corporation controlled through board and shareholder channels, not by search users, creators, advertisers, workers, or affected communities. [3]
Extraction ? Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.	6 / 10	Alphabet is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. Alphabet is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. That places Alphabet / Google in the middle of Extraction: the institution creates real value but still leaves room for rent extraction, unequal bargaining, or surplus capture. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 115 scored entries below, 24 tied, 87 above on Extraction. Linked evidence context Alphabet is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. [1] context A federal court found Google liable for maintaining monopoly power in general search and text advertising markets. [2] Alphabet’s annual report identifies Google Services, including advertising-driven products, as a core business segment, so user attention and data-mediated advertising remain central to surplus extraction. [4]
Labor Sovereignty ? Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.	4 / 7	Alphabet is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. Alphabet is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. That places Alphabet / Google in the middle of Labor Sovereignty: workers or participants have some protection or agency, but not enough binding power to control the relationship. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 112 scored entries below, 39 tied, 75 above on Labor Sovereignty. Linked evidence context Alphabet is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. [1] context A federal court found Google liable for maintaining monopoly power in general search and text advertising markets. [2] Alphabet’s public-company and platform structure gives employees benefits and resources but not binding control over search, ad, AI, or platform governance decisions. [5]
Solidarity with the Unemployed ? Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.	3 / 7	Alphabet is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. Alphabet is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. That places Alphabet / Google in the middle of Solidarity with the Unemployed: some access, severance, retraining, openness, or mutual-aid value is present, but it is not central or durable. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 81 scored entries below, 45 tied, 100 above on Solidarity with the Unemployed. Linked evidence context Alphabet is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. [1] context A federal court found Google liable for maintaining monopoly power in general search and text advertising markets. [2] Google provides many no-price services with real access value, but the advertising and account ecosystem does not create durable solidarity for people outside employment or purchasing power. [6]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity ? Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.	4 / 7	Alphabet is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. Alphabet is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. That places Alphabet / Google in the middle of Loss-Bearing Fidelity: there is some willingness to preserve obligations, but the record still leaves meaningful risk-shifting concerns. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 88 scored entries below, 30 tied, 108 above on Loss-Bearing Fidelity. Linked evidence context Alphabet is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. [1] context A federal court found Google liable for maintaining monopoly power in general search and text advertising markets. [2] Alphabet’s ad-funded infrastructure offers many services without direct fees, but the model shifts costs into data extraction, publisher dependence, advertiser dependence, and affected market power. [7]
Market Conduct ? Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.	1 / 5	A federal court found Google liable for maintaining monopoly power in general search and text advertising markets. A federal court found Google liable for maintaining monopoly power in general search and text advertising markets. That keeps Alphabet / Google low on Market Conduct: market power, lock-in, coercive pricing, or exclusionary conduct is a major part of the institution's position. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 15 scored entries below, 15 tied, 196 above on Market Conduct. Linked evidence A federal court found Google liable for maintaining monopoly power in general search and text advertising markets. [2]
Product Integrity ? Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.	3 / 5	Alphabet is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. Alphabet is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. That places Alphabet / Google in the middle of Product Integrity: the product has real use value but is compromised by incentives, monetization, lock-in, quality degradation, or risk. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 37 scored entries below, 23 tied, 166 above on Product Integrity. Linked evidence context Alphabet is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. [1] context A federal court found Google liable for maintaining monopoly power in general search and text advertising markets. [2] Alphabet’s products include search, Android, Chrome, Gmail, Maps, YouTube, Cloud, and AI systems with real utility, while DOJ search and ad-tech cases show product value is compromised by gatekeeping power. [8]
Scale Integrity ? Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.	2 / 5	Alphabet is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. Alphabet is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. That places Alphabet / Google in the middle of Scale Integrity: scale brings useful reach but also weakens accountability, transparency, or local constraint. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 31 scored entries below, 18 tied, 177 above on Scale Integrity. Linked evidence context Alphabet is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. [1] context A federal court found Google liable for maintaining monopoly power in general search and text advertising markets. [2] Alphabet reports products serving billions of users and major global advertising infrastructure, so scale magnifies gatekeeping, opacity, and dependency even where products remain useful. [9]

Penalties

Penalty	Applied	Why this penalty
Policy Capture ? Private-interest attempts to bend law, regulation, subsidies, taxes, enforcement, trade, labor, safety, competition, environmental, healthcare, housing, surveillance, civil-liberties, or consumer policy against workers, customers, citizens, affected communities, or ecological life. Public-interest advocacy is not penalized merely because it is lobbying. Range: -15 to 0.	-8	OpenLobby records GOOGLE CLIENT SERVICES lobbying on copyright / patents / trademarks, technology, law enforcement, labor, science / technology, consumer product safety with about $1.6M in… OpenLobby records GOOGLE CLIENT SERVICES lobbying on copyright / patents / trademarks, technology, law enforcement, labor, science / technology, consumer product safety with about $1.6M in spending across 36 filings; the reviewed filings document private institutional lobbying over public rules rather than a. That warrants a substantial Policy Capture penalty because private institutional pressure is being applied to public rules while affected people cannot democratically govern that agenda. The value is substantial but not at the floor because the linked record shows serious conduct without the strongest aggravating factors on this axis. Linked evidence OpenLobby records GOOGLE CLIENT SERVICES lobbying on copyright / patents / trademarks, technology, law enforcement, labor, science / technology, consumer product safety with about $1.6M in spending across 36 filings; the reviewed filings document private institutional lobbying over public rules rather than a public-interest advocacy role. [15]
Youth Capture ? Manipulative youth-directed marketing, youth-data or attention monetization, collectible/add-on traps, parasocial or identity capture, surprise mechanics, or treating young people as lower-disclosure consumers. Making useful toys or welcoming children is not itself penalized. Range: -5 to 0.	-5	The FTC and New York Attorney General alleged that Google and YouTube illegally collected personal information from viewers of child-directed YouTube channels without parental notice or consent, resulting in a $170 million settlement under COPPA. The FTC and New York Attorney General alleged that Google and YouTube illegally collected personal information from viewers of child-directed YouTube channels without parental notice or consent, resulting in a $170 million settlement under COPPA. That warrants a severe Youth Capture penalty because young people are treated as manipulable consumers, data sources, attention targets, or culture markets. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 0 scored entries below, 2 tied, 224 above on Youth Capture. Linked evidence The FTC and New York Attorney General alleged that Google and YouTube illegally collected personal information from viewers of child-directed YouTube channels without parental notice or consent, resulting in a $170 million settlement under COPPA. [13]
Accountability Opacity ? Material opacity, reputation laundering, or hidden accountability structures that prevent public accountability. Range: -2 to 0.	-2	Google's ad and ranking systems create material opacity for users, advertisers, publishers, and affected markets. Google's ad and ranking systems create material opacity for users, advertisers, publishers, and affected markets. That warrants a severe Accountability Opacity penalty because material facts, risks, conflicts, ownership, or accountability information are obscured from the public. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 0 scored entries below, 52 tied, 174 above on Accountability Opacity. Linked evidence Google's ad and ranking systems create material opacity for users, advertisers, publishers, and affected markets. [10]
Identity Capture ? Customer pressure, employee pressure, and pervasive identity saturation. Range: -3 to 0.	-3	Google account, search, browser, advertising, maps, mail, and video services create pervasive customer identity pressure across public and private activity. Google account, search, browser, advertising, maps, mail, and video services create pervasive customer identity pressure across public and private activity. That warrants a severe Identity Capture penalty because users, workers, customers, or publics are pressured into identity attachment that protects institutional power. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 0 scored entries below, 12 tied, 214 above on Identity Capture. Linked evidence Google account, search, browser, advertising, maps, mail, and video services create pervasive customer identity pressure across public and private activity. [11]
Surveillance Capture ? Invasive surveillance, unreasonably non-optional tracking, facial recognition, biometric identification, or AI behavior scanning of customers, workers, bystanders, or the public. Range: -5 to 0.	-4	Google account, search, browser, maps, mail, video, advertising, and ad-tech systems create pervasive cross-context tracking and behavioral advertising infrastructure, describes conduct considered under Surveillance Capture. Google account, search, browser, maps, mail, video, advertising, and ad-tech systems create pervasive cross-context tracking and behavioral advertising infrastructure, describes conduct considered under Surveillance Capture. That warrants a severe Surveillance Capture penalty because customers, workers, users, bystanders, or the public are exposed to invasive tracking, biometrics, or behavior scanning. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 13 scored entries below, 11 tied, 202 above on Surveillance Capture. Linked evidence Google account, search, browser, maps, mail, video, advertising, and ad-tech systems create pervasive cross-context tracking and behavioral advertising infrastructure, describes conduct considered under Surveillance Capture. [12]
Ideological Disavowal ? Concealed ideology presented as neutrality, expertise, professional necessity, public-service administration, market inevitability, or non-ideological common sense while exercising power. Range: -3 to 0.	-3	Alphabet / Google's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Alphabet / Google combines major gatekeeping, coercive, or infrastructural power with pronounced… Alphabet / Google's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Alphabet / Google combines major gatekeeping, coercive, or infrastructural power with pronounced claims of neutrality, administrative necessity, national legitimacy, safety, objectivity, or professional expertise. That warrants a severe Ideological Disavowal penalty because the institution presents situated, contested choices as neutrality, expertise, inevitability, safety, or common sense. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Ideological Disavowal 0 to -3 recalibration: 0 for explicit standpoint or no penalty-level neutrality theater; -1 for bounded softening of contested choices; -2 for strong neutrality theater by a powerful institution; -3 for major gatekeeping or coercive power presented as neutral, necessary, objective, or non-ideological. Uncertainty This recalibration uses public self-presentation and profile evidence; later review should add direct language-analysis evidence for high-impact institutions. Linked evidence Alphabet / Google's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Alphabet / Google combines major gatekeeping, coercive, or infrastructural power with pronounced claims of neutrality, administrative necessity, national legitimacy, safety, objectivity, or professional expertise. [14]

Bonus Credits

No bonus credits applied in this version.

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

High 83/100

15 verified linked claims 15 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 15/15 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 14/20

15 verified linked claims

Source quality 17/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 14/18

15 direct claims across 15 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 10/10

15/15 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending

VerificationUnverified

ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)

ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)

Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.

Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

1Alphabet is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures.

Ownership Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 4, 2026

Alphabet investor relationsOfficial self-description · 68%

2A federal court found Google liable for maintaining monopoly power in general search and text advertising markets.

Market Conduct Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 4, 2026

DOJ Google search antitrust casePrimary public record · 100%

3Alphabet’s annual report and investor structure show a public corporation controlled through board and shareholder channels, not by search users, creators, advertisers, workers, or affected communities.

Governance Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Alphabet 2024 annual reportPrimary institutional record · 90%
Google productsOfficial self-description · 68%
DOJ Google search antitrust casePrimary public record · 100%
DOJ Google ad tech antitrust casePrimary public record · 100%

4Alphabet’s annual report identifies Google Services, including advertising-driven products, as a core business segment, so user attention and data-mediated advertising remain central to surplus extraction.

Extraction Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Alphabet 2024 annual reportPrimary institutional record · 90%
Google productsOfficial self-description · 68%
DOJ Google search antitrust casePrimary public record · 100%
DOJ Google ad tech antitrust casePrimary public record · 100%

5Alphabet’s public-company and platform structure gives employees benefits and resources but not binding control over search, ad, AI, or platform governance decisions.

Labor Sovereignty Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Alphabet 2024 annual reportPrimary institutional record · 90%
Google productsOfficial self-description · 68%
DOJ Google search antitrust casePrimary public record · 100%
DOJ Google ad tech antitrust casePrimary public record · 100%

6Google provides many no-price services with real access value, but the advertising and account ecosystem does not create durable solidarity for people outside employment or purchasing power.

Solidarity Unemployed Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Alphabet 2024 annual reportPrimary institutional record · 90%
Google productsOfficial self-description · 68%
DOJ Google search antitrust casePrimary public record · 100%
DOJ Google ad tech antitrust casePrimary public record · 100%

7Alphabet’s ad-funded infrastructure offers many services without direct fees, but the model shifts costs into data extraction, publisher dependence, advertiser dependence, and affected market power.

Loss Bearing Fidelity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Alphabet 2024 annual reportPrimary institutional record · 90%
Google productsOfficial self-description · 68%
DOJ Google search antitrust casePrimary public record · 100%
DOJ Google ad tech antitrust casePrimary public record · 100%

8Alphabet’s products include search, Android, Chrome, Gmail, Maps, YouTube, Cloud, and AI systems with real utility, while DOJ search and ad-tech cases show product value is compromised by gatekeeping power.

Product Integrity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Alphabet 2024 annual reportPrimary institutional record · 90%
Google productsOfficial self-description · 68%
DOJ Google search antitrust casePrimary public record · 100%
DOJ Google ad tech antitrust casePrimary public record · 100%

9Alphabet reports products serving billions of users and major global advertising infrastructure, so scale magnifies gatekeeping, opacity, and dependency even where products remain useful.

Scale Integrity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Alphabet 2024 annual reportPrimary institutional record · 90%
Google productsOfficial self-description · 68%
DOJ Google search antitrust casePrimary public record · 100%
DOJ Google ad tech antitrust casePrimary public record · 100%

10Google's ad and ranking systems create material opacity for users, advertisers, publishers, and affected markets.

Accountability Opacity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 4, 2026

DOJ Google ad tech antitrust casePrimary public record · 100%

11Google account, search, browser, advertising, maps, mail, and video services create pervasive customer identity pressure across public and private activity.

Identity Capture Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 4, 2026

Google Account overviewGeneral web source · 58%
Google productsOfficial self-description · 68%

12Google account, search, browser, maps, mail, video, advertising, and ad-tech systems create pervasive cross-context tracking and behavioral advertising infrastructure, describes conduct considered under Surveillance Capture.

Surveillance Capture Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 6, 2026

AI scaffold

Google Account overviewGeneral web source · 58%
Google productsOfficial self-description · 68%
DOJ Google ad tech antitrust casePrimary public record · 100%

13The FTC and New York Attorney General alleged that Google and YouTube illegally collected personal information from viewers of child-directed YouTube channels without parental notice or consent, resulting in a $170 million settlement under COPPA.

Youth Capture Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 7, 2026

FTC: Google and YouTube COPPA settlementPrimary public record · 100%
FTC: Google Play children in-app purchase settlementPrimary public record · 100%

14Alphabet / Google's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Alphabet / Google combines major gatekeeping, coercive, or infrastructural power with pronounced claims of neutrality, administrative necessity, national legitimacy, safety, objectivity, or professional expertise.

Ideological Disavowal Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 9, 2026

AI scaffold

Alphabet / Google official siteGeneral web source · 58%
DOJ Google search antitrust casePrimary public record · 100%
DOJ Google ad tech antitrust casePrimary public record · 100%

15OpenLobby records GOOGLE CLIENT SERVICES lobbying on copyright / patents / trademarks, technology, law enforcement, labor, science / technology, consumer product safety with about $1.6M in spending across 36 filings; the reviewed filings document private institutional lobbying over public rules rather than a public-interest advocacy role.

Policy Capture Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

OpenLobby — GOOGLE CLIENT SERVICES lobbying profileGeneral web source · 58%

16Alphabet / Google receives the Private Government badge because it combines large-scale private rule-setting over customers, workers, users, members, or counterparties with OpenLobby-documented lobbying of about $1.6M on public policy issues.

Private Government Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

OpenLobby — GOOGLE CLIENT SERVICES lobbying profileGeneral web source · 58%

Alternatives

AGOOD55 Signal Foundation nonprofit · same market BQUALIFIED44 Bluesky public-benefit social network company · same market AGOOD59 Matrix.org Foundation open communications foundation · United Kingdom AGOOD50 Ecosia private search company / steward-owned structure · Germany

Competitors

AGOOD55 Signal Foundation nonprofit · same market BQUALIFIED44 Bluesky public-benefit social network company · same market DEXTRACTIVE18 Tumblr Automattic-owned social blogging platform · same market DEXTRACTIVE11 Pinterest public visual discovery and advertising platform · same market DEXTRACTIVE8 Reddit public social-link and discussion platform · same market DEXTRACTIVE2 Discord private chat and community platform · same market FMALIGNANT-9 Snap / Snapchat public camera and messaging platform · same market FMALIGNANT-12 InMarket location advertising data aggregator · same market

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for Alphabet / Google Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

May 7, 2026 at 12:00 AM UTC ai-scaffolding youth-capture-assessment

Added source-backed Youth Capture penalty -5 based on evidence specific to youth data, child-directed marketing, loot-box/gambling-like monetization, or youth-culture manipulation.

May 6, 2026 at 12:00 AM UTC ai-scaffolding toxic-products-assessment

Added tentative AI-generated Toxic Products penalty 0 and directory value for current toxic, addictive, pesticide, livestock, chemical, or consumer-safety product exposure.

May 5, 2026 at 12:00 AM UTC ai_scaffolding score

Published tentative AI-generated scaffolding score 17 for initial human review under gcd-rubric-v1.

View Full Audit Log