public-benefit social network company

Bluesky

A public-benefit social network company building Bluesky and the AT Protocol for portable identity, public conversation, feeds, and stackable moderation. Bluesky scores higher than legacy social platforms because protocol design gives users more exit and moderation choice, but it remains a venture-backed company with centralized defaults and public-data exposure.

Why this matters: Bluesky is an important test of whether a social app can move power from one platform owner toward protocol-level user agency.

Letter grade B Qualified Medium confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1 Last reviewed May 12, 2026

Final Score 44* B - Qualified

BQUALIFIED44 pts

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material39

Bonus+8

Cap66No structure cap

After Cap47

Penalties-3

!Not Verified

Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Evaluation Overview

B - Qualified

The score turns mainly on Governance, with the largest penalty coming from Identity Capture.

Strengths

Governance6/10
Extraction5/10
Loss-Bearing Fidelity5/7

Penalties

Identity Capture-1
Surveillance Capture-1
Ideological Disavowal-1

Evidence state

ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Linked claims16
Direct axis claims16
Coverage16/16

Scoring Axes

Axis	Score	Why this score
Ownership ? Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.	4 / 10	Bluesky is a public-benefit social network company building the AT Protocol around portable identity, public conversation, feed generators, and stackable moderation. Bluesky is a public-benefit social network company building the AT Protocol around portable identity, public conversation, feed generators, and stackable moderation. Ownership remains outside direct user, worker, or community control unless the organization is explicitly open-source, nonprofit, or federated. This supports meaningful Ownership credit for Bluesky because the evidence changes who controls the platform relationship, who bears the risk, and how easy exit is for users or communities. Compared with Mastodon and Lemmy, Bluesky remains more company-centered; compared with Reddit and Twitter (X), protocol portability and stackable moderation place it higher. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Social-platform comparative pass for Ownership. Linked evidence Bluesky is a public-benefit social network company building the AT Protocol around portable identity, public conversation, feed generators, and stackable moderation. Ownership remains outside direct user, worker, or community control unless the organization is explicitly open-source, nonprofit, or federated. [1]
Governance ? Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.	6 / 10	Bluesky is a public-benefit social network company building the AT Protocol around portable identity, public conversation, feed generators, and stackable moderation. Bluesky is a public-benefit social network company building the AT Protocol around portable identity, public conversation, feed generators, and stackable moderation. Governance evidence centers on who controls policies, moderation, ranking, protocols, and enforcement. This supports meaningful Governance credit for Bluesky because the evidence changes who controls the platform relationship, who bears the risk, and how easy exit is for users or communities. Compared with Mastodon and Lemmy, Bluesky remains more company-centered; compared with Reddit and Twitter (X), protocol portability and stackable moderation place it higher. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Social-platform comparative pass for Governance. Linked evidence Bluesky is a public-benefit social network company building the AT Protocol around portable identity, public conversation, feed generators, and stackable moderation. Governance evidence centers on who controls policies, moderation, ranking, protocols, and enforcement. [2]
Extraction ? Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.	5 / 10	Bluesky is a public-benefit social network company building the AT Protocol around portable identity, public conversation, feed generators, and stackable moderation. Bluesky is a public-benefit social network company building the AT Protocol around portable identity, public conversation, feed generators, and stackable moderation. Extraction turns on whether platform value is captured by owners or structurally returned to users, workers, communities, or the public. This supports meaningful Extraction credit for Bluesky because the evidence changes who controls the platform relationship, who bears the risk, and how easy exit is for users or communities. Compared with Mastodon and Lemmy, Bluesky remains more company-centered; compared with Reddit and Twitter (X), protocol portability and stackable moderation place it higher. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Social-platform comparative pass for Extraction. Linked evidence Bluesky is a public-benefit social network company building the AT Protocol around portable identity, public conversation, feed generators, and stackable moderation. Extraction turns on whether platform value is captured by owners or structurally returned to users, workers, communities, or the public. [3]
Labor Sovereignty ? Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.	4 / 7	Bluesky is a public-benefit social network company building the AT Protocol around portable identity, public conversation, feed generators, and stackable moderation. Bluesky is a public-benefit social network company building the AT Protocol around portable identity, public conversation, feed generators, and stackable moderation. Labor-sovereignty evidence includes paid employees, creators, volunteer moderators, developers, and community operators affected by platform control. This supports meaningful Labor Sovereignty credit for Bluesky because the evidence changes who controls the platform relationship, who bears the risk, and how easy exit is for users or communities. Compared with Mastodon and Lemmy, Bluesky remains more company-centered; compared with Reddit and Twitter (X), protocol portability and stackable moderation place it higher. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Social-platform comparative pass for Labor Sovereignty. Linked evidence Bluesky is a public-benefit social network company building the AT Protocol around portable identity, public conversation, feed generators, and stackable moderation. Labor-sovereignty evidence includes paid employees, creators, volunteer moderators, developers, and community operators affected by platform control. [4]
Solidarity with the Unemployed ? Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.	3 / 7	Bluesky is a public-benefit social network company building the AT Protocol around portable identity, public conversation, feed generators, and stackable moderation. Bluesky is a public-benefit social network company building the AT Protocol around portable identity, public conversation, feed generators, and stackable moderation. Solidarity evidence asks whether people outside paid employment receive durable access, exit, or support rather than mere platform access. This supports limited Solidarity with the Unemployed credit for Bluesky because the evidence changes who controls the platform relationship, who bears the risk, and how easy exit is for users or communities. Compared with Mastodon and Lemmy, Bluesky remains more company-centered; compared with Reddit and Twitter (X), protocol portability and stackable moderation place it higher. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Social-platform comparative pass for Solidarity with the Unemployed. Linked evidence Bluesky is a public-benefit social network company building the AT Protocol around portable identity, public conversation, feed generators, and stackable moderation. Solidarity evidence asks whether people outside paid employment receive durable access, exit, or support rather than mere platform access. [5]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity ? Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.	5 / 7	Bluesky is a public-benefit social network company building the AT Protocol around portable identity, public conversation, feed generators, and stackable moderation. Bluesky is a public-benefit social network company building the AT Protocol around portable identity, public conversation, feed generators, and stackable moderation. Loss-bearing fidelity depends on whether the platform absorbs costs to preserve user rights, safety, privacy, and public obligations. This supports meaningful Loss-Bearing Fidelity credit for Bluesky because the evidence changes who controls the platform relationship, who bears the risk, and how easy exit is for users or communities. Compared with Mastodon and Lemmy, Bluesky remains more company-centered; compared with Reddit and Twitter (X), protocol portability and stackable moderation place it higher. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Social-platform comparative pass for Loss-Bearing Fidelity. Linked evidence Bluesky is a public-benefit social network company building the AT Protocol around portable identity, public conversation, feed generators, and stackable moderation. Loss-bearing fidelity depends on whether the platform absorbs costs to preserve user rights, safety, privacy, and public obligations. [6]
Market Conduct ? Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.	4 / 5	Bluesky is a public-benefit social network company building the AT Protocol around portable identity, public conversation, feed generators, and stackable moderation. Bluesky is a public-benefit social network company building the AT Protocol around portable identity, public conversation, feed generators, and stackable moderation. Market conduct depends on lock-in, switching costs, monetization, subscription pressure, advertising, and interoperability. This supports meaningful Market Conduct credit for Bluesky because the evidence changes who controls the platform relationship, who bears the risk, and how easy exit is for users or communities. Compared with Mastodon and Lemmy, Bluesky remains more company-centered; compared with Reddit and Twitter (X), protocol portability and stackable moderation place it higher. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Social-platform comparative pass for Market Conduct. Linked evidence Bluesky is a public-benefit social network company building the AT Protocol around portable identity, public conversation, feed generators, and stackable moderation. Market conduct depends on lock-in, switching costs, monetization, subscription pressure, advertising, and interoperability. [7]
Product Integrity ? Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.	4 / 5	Bluesky is a public-benefit social network company building the AT Protocol around portable identity, public conversation, feed generators, and stackable moderation. Bluesky is a public-benefit social network company building the AT Protocol around portable identity, public conversation, feed generators, and stackable moderation. Product integrity turns on whether useful communication is preserved or degraded by ranking, advertising, surveillance, or engagement incentives. This supports meaningful Product Integrity credit for Bluesky because the evidence changes who controls the platform relationship, who bears the risk, and how easy exit is for users or communities. Compared with Mastodon and Lemmy, Bluesky remains more company-centered; compared with Reddit and Twitter (X), protocol portability and stackable moderation place it higher. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Social-platform comparative pass for Product Integrity. Linked evidence Bluesky is a public-benefit social network company building the AT Protocol around portable identity, public conversation, feed generators, and stackable moderation. Product integrity turns on whether useful communication is preserved or degraded by ranking, advertising, surveillance, or engagement incentives. [8]
Scale Integrity ? Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.	4 / 5	Bluesky is a public-benefit social network company building the AT Protocol around portable identity, public conversation, feed generators, and stackable moderation. Bluesky is a public-benefit social network company building the AT Protocol around portable identity, public conversation, feed generators, and stackable moderation. Scale integrity depends on whether growth distributes power or concentrates private control over public conversation. This supports meaningful Scale Integrity credit for Bluesky because the evidence changes who controls the platform relationship, who bears the risk, and how easy exit is for users or communities. Compared with Mastodon and Lemmy, Bluesky remains more company-centered; compared with Reddit and Twitter (X), protocol portability and stackable moderation place it higher. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Social-platform comparative pass for Scale Integrity. Linked evidence Bluesky is a public-benefit social network company building the AT Protocol around portable identity, public conversation, feed generators, and stackable moderation. Scale integrity depends on whether growth distributes power or concentrates private control over public conversation. [9]

Penalties

Penalty	Applied	Why this penalty
Identity Capture ? Customer pressure, employee pressure, and pervasive identity saturation. Range: -3 to 0.	-1	Bluesky still hosts public identity, reputation, and follower networks inside a social app, even with better portability. Bluesky still hosts public identity, reputation, and follower networks inside a social app, even with better portability. This supports limited Identity Capture penalty for Bluesky because the evidence changes who controls the platform relationship, who bears the risk, and how easy exit is for users or communities. Compared with Mastodon and Lemmy, Bluesky remains more company-centered; compared with Reddit and Twitter (X), protocol portability and stackable moderation place it higher. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Social-platform comparative pass for Identity Capture. Linked evidence Bluesky still hosts public identity, reputation, and follower networks inside a social app, even with better portability. [14]
Surveillance Capture ? Invasive surveillance, unreasonably non-optional tracking, facial recognition, biometric identification, or AI behavior scanning of customers, workers, bystanders, or the public. Range: -5 to 0.	-1	Bluesky’s AT Protocol makes public conversation data broadly accessible by design, even though this is partly a transparency and portability tradeoff. Bluesky’s AT Protocol makes public conversation data broadly accessible by design, even though this is partly a transparency and portability tradeoff. This supports limited Surveillance Capture penalty for Bluesky because the evidence changes who controls the platform relationship, who bears the risk, and how easy exit is for users or communities. Compared with Mastodon and Lemmy, Bluesky remains more company-centered; compared with Reddit and Twitter (X), protocol portability and stackable moderation place it higher. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Social-platform comparative pass for Surveillance Capture. Linked evidence Bluesky’s AT Protocol makes public conversation data broadly accessible by design, even though this is partly a transparency and portability tradeoff. [15]
Ideological Disavowal ? Concealed ideology presented as neutrality, expertise, professional necessity, public-service administration, market inevitability, or non-ideological common sense while exercising power. Range: -3 to 0.	-1	Bluesky is relatively explicit about protocol values and public-data tradeoffs, but still presents complex governance choices as technical architecture. Bluesky is relatively explicit about protocol values and public-data tradeoffs, but still presents complex governance choices as technical architecture. This supports limited Ideological Disavowal penalty for Bluesky because the evidence changes who controls the platform relationship, who bears the risk, and how easy exit is for users or communities. Compared with Mastodon and Lemmy, Bluesky remains more company-centered; compared with Reddit and Twitter (X), protocol portability and stackable moderation place it higher. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Social-platform comparative pass for Ideological Disavowal. Linked evidence Bluesky is relatively explicit about protocol values and public-data tradeoffs, but still presents complex governance choices as technical architecture. [16]

Bonus Credits

Bonus	Credit	Why this credit
Openness to Dissent ? Credit for tolerating internal, user, customer, worker, and public dissent without retaliation, capture, or viewpoint laundering.	2 / 3	Bluesky supports alternative feed generators and moderation labelers, creating more room for plural moderation and dissent than a single default feed. Bluesky supports alternative feed generators and moderation labelers, creating more room for plural moderation and dissent than a single default feed. This supports Openness to Dissent credit for Bluesky because the evidence changes who controls the platform relationship, who bears the risk, and how easy exit is for users or communities. Compared with Mastodon and Lemmy, Bluesky remains more company-centered; compared with Reddit and Twitter (X), protocol portability and stackable moderation place it higher. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Social-platform comparative pass for Openness to Dissent. Linked evidence Bluesky supports alternative feed generators and moderation labelers, creating more room for plural moderation and dissent than a single default feed. [10]
Constitutional Spirit ? Credit for respecting constitutional rights and civil-liberties norms even where private law does not strictly require it.	2 / 3	Bluesky’s design gives users more agency over moderation and curation, which better approximates civil-liberties norms than centralized feed control. Bluesky’s design gives users more agency over moderation and curation, which better approximates civil-liberties norms than centralized feed control. This supports Constitutional Spirit credit for Bluesky because the evidence changes who controls the platform relationship, who bears the risk, and how easy exit is for users or communities. Compared with Mastodon and Lemmy, Bluesky remains more company-centered; compared with Reddit and Twitter (X), protocol portability and stackable moderation place it higher. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Social-platform comparative pass for Constitutional Spirit. Linked evidence Bluesky’s design gives users more agency over moderation and curation, which better approximates civil-liberties norms than centralized feed control. [11]
Good Deal ? Credit for unusually fair value: durable quality, fair pricing, low lock-in, and clear customer surplus.	2 / 3	Bluesky gives users free access to a social network with portable identity and more open protocol affordances than most peers. Bluesky gives users free access to a social network with portable identity and more open protocol affordances than most peers. This supports Good Deal credit for Bluesky because the evidence changes who controls the platform relationship, who bears the risk, and how easy exit is for users or communities. Compared with Mastodon and Lemmy, Bluesky remains more company-centered; compared with Reddit and Twitter (X), protocol portability and stackable moderation place it higher. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Social-platform comparative pass for Good Deal. Linked evidence Bluesky gives users free access to a social network with portable identity and more open protocol affordances than most peers. [12]
Cost Transparency ? Credit for clear posted prices, all-in fees, unit costs, public rate cards, margin/cost visibility, or surplus-allocation transparency, especially in markets where opaque quotes, hidden fees, or individualized pricing are normal.	2 / 3	Bluesky’s protocol documents explain architectural tradeoffs around identity, data, feeds, and moderation. Bluesky’s protocol documents explain architectural tradeoffs around identity, data, feeds, and moderation. This supports Cost Transparency credit for Bluesky because the evidence changes who controls the platform relationship, who bears the risk, and how easy exit is for users or communities. Compared with Mastodon and Lemmy, Bluesky remains more company-centered; compared with Reddit and Twitter (X), protocol portability and stackable moderation place it higher. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Social-platform comparative pass for Cost Transparency. Linked evidence Bluesky’s protocol documents explain architectural tradeoffs around identity, data, feeds, and moderation. [13]

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

Medium 76/100

16 verified linked claims 16 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 16/16 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 13/20

16 verified linked claims

Source quality 10/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 14/18

16 direct claims across 16 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 10/10

16/16 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending

VerificationUnverified

ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)

ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)

Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.

Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

1Bluesky is a public-benefit social network company building the AT Protocol around portable identity, public conversation, feed generators, and stackable moderation. Ownership remains outside direct user, worker, or community control unless the organization is explicitly open-source, nonprofit, or federated.

Ownership Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Bluesky data privacyGeneral web source · 58%
Bluesky 2024 protocol roadmapGeneral web source · 58%

2Bluesky is a public-benefit social network company building the AT Protocol around portable identity, public conversation, feed generators, and stackable moderation. Governance evidence centers on who controls policies, moderation, ranking, protocols, and enforcement.

Governance Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Bluesky data privacyGeneral web source · 58%
Bluesky 2024 protocol roadmapGeneral web source · 58%

3Bluesky is a public-benefit social network company building the AT Protocol around portable identity, public conversation, feed generators, and stackable moderation. Extraction turns on whether platform value is captured by owners or structurally returned to users, workers, communities, or the public.

Extraction Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Bluesky data privacyGeneral web source · 58%
Bluesky 2024 protocol roadmapGeneral web source · 58%

4Bluesky is a public-benefit social network company building the AT Protocol around portable identity, public conversation, feed generators, and stackable moderation. Labor-sovereignty evidence includes paid employees, creators, volunteer moderators, developers, and community operators affected by platform control.

Labor Sovereignty Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Bluesky data privacyGeneral web source · 58%
Bluesky 2024 protocol roadmapGeneral web source · 58%

5Bluesky is a public-benefit social network company building the AT Protocol around portable identity, public conversation, feed generators, and stackable moderation. Solidarity evidence asks whether people outside paid employment receive durable access, exit, or support rather than mere platform access.

Solidarity Unemployed Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Bluesky data privacyGeneral web source · 58%
Bluesky 2024 protocol roadmapGeneral web source · 58%

6Bluesky is a public-benefit social network company building the AT Protocol around portable identity, public conversation, feed generators, and stackable moderation. Loss-bearing fidelity depends on whether the platform absorbs costs to preserve user rights, safety, privacy, and public obligations.

Loss Bearing Fidelity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Bluesky data privacyGeneral web source · 58%
Bluesky 2024 protocol roadmapGeneral web source · 58%

7Bluesky is a public-benefit social network company building the AT Protocol around portable identity, public conversation, feed generators, and stackable moderation. Market conduct depends on lock-in, switching costs, monetization, subscription pressure, advertising, and interoperability.

Market Conduct Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Bluesky data privacyGeneral web source · 58%
Bluesky 2024 protocol roadmapGeneral web source · 58%

8Bluesky is a public-benefit social network company building the AT Protocol around portable identity, public conversation, feed generators, and stackable moderation. Product integrity turns on whether useful communication is preserved or degraded by ranking, advertising, surveillance, or engagement incentives.

Product Integrity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Bluesky data privacyGeneral web source · 58%
Bluesky 2024 protocol roadmapGeneral web source · 58%

9Bluesky is a public-benefit social network company building the AT Protocol around portable identity, public conversation, feed generators, and stackable moderation. Scale integrity depends on whether growth distributes power or concentrates private control over public conversation.

Scale Integrity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Bluesky data privacyGeneral web source · 58%
Bluesky 2024 protocol roadmapGeneral web source · 58%

10Bluesky supports alternative feed generators and moderation labelers, creating more room for plural moderation and dissent than a single default feed.

Openness To Dissent Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Bluesky data privacyGeneral web source · 58%
Bluesky 2024 protocol roadmapGeneral web source · 58%

11Bluesky’s design gives users more agency over moderation and curation, which better approximates civil-liberties norms than centralized feed control.

Constitutional Spirit Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Bluesky data privacyGeneral web source · 58%
Bluesky 2024 protocol roadmapGeneral web source · 58%

12Bluesky gives users free access to a social network with portable identity and more open protocol affordances than most peers.

Good Deal Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Bluesky data privacyGeneral web source · 58%
Bluesky 2024 protocol roadmapGeneral web source · 58%

13Bluesky’s protocol documents explain architectural tradeoffs around identity, data, feeds, and moderation.

Cost Transparency Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Bluesky data privacyGeneral web source · 58%
Bluesky 2024 protocol roadmapGeneral web source · 58%

14Bluesky still hosts public identity, reputation, and follower networks inside a social app, even with better portability.

Identity Capture Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Bluesky data privacyGeneral web source · 58%
Bluesky 2024 protocol roadmapGeneral web source · 58%

15Bluesky’s AT Protocol makes public conversation data broadly accessible by design, even though this is partly a transparency and portability tradeoff.

Surveillance Capture Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Bluesky data privacyGeneral web source · 58%
Bluesky 2024 protocol roadmapGeneral web source · 58%

16Bluesky is relatively explicit about protocol values and public-data tradeoffs, but still presents complex governance choices as technical architecture.

Ideological Disavowal Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Bluesky data privacyGeneral web source · 58%
Bluesky 2024 protocol roadmapGeneral web source · 58%

Alternatives

AGOOD55 Signal Foundation nonprofit · same market AGOOD59 Matrix.org Foundation open communications foundation · United Kingdom AGOOD50 Ecosia private search company / steward-owned structure · Germany

Competitors

AGOOD55 Signal Foundation nonprofit · same market DEXTRACTIVE18 Tumblr Automattic-owned social blogging platform · same market DEXTRACTIVE11 Pinterest public visual discovery and advertising platform · same market DEXTRACTIVE8 Reddit public social-link and discussion platform · same market DEXTRACTIVE2 Alphabet / Google public company · same market DEXTRACTIVE2 Discord private chat and community platform · same market FMALIGNANT-9 Snap / Snapchat public camera and messaging platform · same market FMALIGNANT-12 InMarket location advertising data aggregator · same market

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for Bluesky Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.

View Full Audit Log