humanitarian and disaster-relief nonprofit

American Red Cross

Industry Aid

A congressionally chartered humanitarian nonprofit with major disaster-relief, blood, training, and international services, but also high-profile failures and opacity concerns in major relief efforts. American Red Cross remains weak because of documented human harm, person-dependent governance, and material opacity, even where the product or service has practical value.

Why this matters: The Red Cross is a necessary calibration point because enormous humanitarian trust can coexist with repeated accountability failures.

Letter grade D Extractive Medium confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1 Last reviewed May 7, 2026

Final Score 31* D - Extractive

DEXTRACTIVE31 pts

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material38

Bonus+6

Cap66No structure cap

After Cap44

Penalties-13

!Not Verified

Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Evaluation Overview

D - Extractive

The score turns mainly on Ownership, with the largest penalty coming from Reversibility.

Strengths

Ownership5/10
Governance5/10
Extraction5/10

Penalties

Reversibility-5
Human Harm-5
Accountability Opacity-2
Ecological Harm-1

Evidence state

ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Linked claims11
Direct axis claims10
Coverage10/17

Scoring Axes

Axis	Score	Why this score
Ownership ? Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.	5 / 10	The American Red Cross describes a mission to prevent and alleviate human suffering through disaster relief, blood services, training, service to armed forces, and international services. The American Red Cross describes a mission to prevent and alleviate human suffering through disaster relief, blood services, training, service to armed forces, and international services. That places American Red Cross in the middle of Ownership: there is some mission, member, producer, or public-interest constraint, but decisive control is not fully democratic. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 118 scored entries below, 6 tied, 102 above on Ownership. Linked evidence context The American Red Cross describes a mission to prevent and alleviate human suffering through disaster relief, blood services, training, service to armed forces, and international services. [1] context The American Red Cross publishes annual reports and financial statements for its humanitarian and blood-service operations. [2]
Governance ? Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.	5 / 10	The American Red Cross describes a mission to prevent and alleviate human suffering through disaster relief, blood services, training, service to armed forces, and international services. The American Red Cross describes a mission to prevent and alleviate human suffering through disaster relief, blood services, training, service to armed forces, and international services. That places American Red Cross in the middle of Governance: there are accountability mechanisms, but they stop short of broad democratic control. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 127 scored entries below, 20 tied, 79 above on Governance. Linked evidence The American Red Cross describes a mission to prevent and alleviate human suffering through disaster relief, blood services, training, service to armed forces, and international services. [1] context The American Red Cross publishes annual reports and financial statements for its humanitarian and blood-service operations. [2]
Extraction ? Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.	5 / 10	The American Red Cross describes a mission to prevent and alleviate human suffering through disaster relief, blood services, training, service to armed forces, and international services. The American Red Cross describes a mission to prevent and alleviate human suffering through disaster relief, blood services, training, service to armed forces, and international services. That places American Red Cross in the middle of Extraction: the institution creates real value but still leaves room for rent extraction, unequal bargaining, or surplus capture. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 95 scored entries below, 19 tied, 112 above on Extraction. Linked evidence context The American Red Cross describes a mission to prevent and alleviate human suffering through disaster relief, blood services, training, service to armed forces, and international services. [1] context The American Red Cross publishes annual reports and financial statements for its humanitarian and blood-service operations. [2]
Labor Sovereignty ? Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.	3 / 7	The American Red Cross describes a mission to prevent and alleviate human suffering through disaster relief, blood services, training, service to armed forces, and international services. The American Red Cross describes a mission to prevent and alleviate human suffering through disaster relief, blood services, training, service to armed forces, and international services. That places American Red Cross in the middle of Labor Sovereignty: workers or participants have some protection or agency, but not enough binding power to control the relationship. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 45 scored entries below, 66 tied, 115 above on Labor Sovereignty. Linked evidence context The American Red Cross describes a mission to prevent and alleviate human suffering through disaster relief, blood services, training, service to armed forces, and international services. [1] context The American Red Cross publishes annual reports and financial statements for its humanitarian and blood-service operations. [2]
Solidarity with the Unemployed ? Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.	5 / 7	The American Red Cross describes a mission to prevent and alleviate human suffering through disaster relief, blood services, training, service to armed forces, and international services. The American Red Cross describes a mission to prevent and alleviate human suffering through disaster relief, blood services, training, service to armed forces, and international services. That places American Red Cross in the middle of Solidarity with the Unemployed: some access, severance, retraining, openness, or mutual-aid value is present, but it is not central or durable. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 158 scored entries below, 38 tied, 30 above on Solidarity with the Unemployed. Linked evidence context The American Red Cross describes a mission to prevent and alleviate human suffering through disaster relief, blood services, training, service to armed forces, and international services. [1] context The American Red Cross publishes annual reports and financial statements for its humanitarian and blood-service operations. [2]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity ? Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.	4 / 7	The American Red Cross describes a mission to prevent and alleviate human suffering through disaster relief, blood services, training, service to armed forces, and international services. The American Red Cross describes a mission to prevent and alleviate human suffering through disaster relief, blood services, training, service to armed forces, and international services. That places American Red Cross in the middle of Loss-Bearing Fidelity: there is some willingness to preserve obligations, but the record still leaves meaningful risk-shifting concerns. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 88 scored entries below, 30 tied, 108 above on Loss-Bearing Fidelity. Linked evidence context The American Red Cross describes a mission to prevent and alleviate human suffering through disaster relief, blood services, training, service to armed forces, and international services. [1] context The American Red Cross publishes annual reports and financial statements for its humanitarian and blood-service operations. [2]
Market Conduct ? Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.	4 / 5	The American Red Cross describes a mission to prevent and alleviate human suffering through disaster relief, blood services, training, service to armed forces, and international services. The American Red Cross describes a mission to prevent and alleviate human suffering through disaster relief, blood services, training, service to armed forces, and international services. That places American Red Cross high on Market Conduct: pricing, access, switching, and bargaining practices show restraint compared with ordinary rent-seeking competitors. A still-higher or maximum value requires stronger proof that this structure is durable, broad, and not merely discretionary. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 106 scored entries below, 73 tied, 47 above on Market Conduct. Linked evidence context The American Red Cross describes a mission to prevent and alleviate human suffering through disaster relief, blood services, training, service to armed forces, and international services. [1] context The American Red Cross publishes annual reports and financial statements for its humanitarian and blood-service operations. [2]
Product Integrity ? Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.	4 / 5	The American Red Cross publishes annual reports and financial statements for its humanitarian and blood-service operations. The American Red Cross publishes annual reports and financial statements for its humanitarian and blood-service operations. That places American Red Cross high on Product Integrity: the core offering is genuinely useful and comparatively less dependent on traps, degradation, or harmful dependencies. A still-higher or maximum value requires stronger proof that this structure is durable, broad, and not merely discretionary. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 61 scored entries below, 72 tied, 93 above on Product Integrity. Linked evidence context The American Red Cross describes a mission to prevent and alleviate human suffering through disaster relief, blood services, training, service to armed forces, and international services. [1] The American Red Cross publishes annual reports and financial statements for its humanitarian and blood-service operations. [2]
Scale Integrity ? Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.	3 / 5	The American Red Cross describes a mission to prevent and alleviate human suffering through disaster relief, blood services, training, service to armed forces, and international services. The American Red Cross describes a mission to prevent and alleviate human suffering through disaster relief, blood services, training, service to armed forces, and international services. That places American Red Cross in the middle of Scale Integrity: scale brings useful reach but also weakens accountability, transparency, or local constraint. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 50 scored entries below, 58 tied, 118 above on Scale Integrity. Linked evidence context The American Red Cross describes a mission to prevent and alleviate human suffering through disaster relief, blood services, training, service to armed forces, and international services. [1] context The American Red Cross publishes annual reports and financial statements for its humanitarian and blood-service operations. [2]

Penalties

Penalty	Applied	Why this penalty
Reversibility ? Applied when positive conduct depends on current living leaders, founders, family owners, or other person-contingent governance rather than durable structure. Range: -5 to 0.	-5	The organization’s positive conduct depends materially on current leadership, nonprofit or platform policy, accreditation rules, religious culture, or discretionary operating practice rather than on locked worker or affected-stakeholder control. The organization’s positive conduct depends materially on current leadership, nonprofit or platform policy, accreditation rules, religious culture, or discretionary operating practice rather than on locked worker or affected-stakeholder control. That warrants a severe Reversibility penalty because favorable conduct depends on current people or discretionary leadership rather than locked stakeholder structure. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 0 scored entries below, 95 tied, 131 above on Reversibility. Linked evidence The organization’s positive conduct depends materially on current leadership, nonprofit or platform policy, accreditation rules, religious culture, or discretionary operating practice rather than on locked worker or affected-stakeholder control. [7]
Human Harm ? Severity, scale, culpability, vulnerable targets, willful reoffense, reputation laundering, pattern escalation, and time decay. Range: -20 to 0.	-5	A ProPublica/NPR investigation reported severe shortfalls in the Red Cross Haiti earthquake response, including raising about half a billion dollars while building only a small number of permanent homes. A ProPublica/NPR investigation reported severe shortfalls in the Red Cross Haiti earthquake response, including raising about half a billion dollars while building only a small number of permanent homes. That warrants a limited Human Harm penalty because ordinary operation, documented misconduct, or institutional power creates serious injury, deprivation, abuse, or foreseeable human damage. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 41 scored entries below, 6 tied, 179 above on Human Harm. Linked evidence A ProPublica/NPR investigation reported severe shortfalls in the Red Cross Haiti earthquake response, including raising about half a billion dollars while building only a small number of permanent homes. [8]
Ecological Harm ? Footprint, trajectory, irreversibility, culpability, and scale, including whether ecological harm is central to the model and continued after credible notice. Range: -30 to 0.	-1	Large disaster, blood, and logistics operations create ecological impact, though ecological extraction is not the core purpose. Large disaster, blood, and logistics operations create ecological impact, though ecological extraction is not the core purpose. That warrants a limited Ecological Harm penalty because the institution causes or defends ecological damage that is more than incidental to the model. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 57 scored entries below, 7 tied, 162 above on Ecological Harm. Linked evidence Large disaster, blood, and logistics operations create ecological impact, though ecological extraction is not the core purpose. [9]
Accountability Opacity ? Material opacity, reputation laundering, or hidden accountability structures that prevent public accountability. Range: -2 to 0.	-2	The Haiti investigation documented public claims and donor-facing messaging that were difficult to reconcile with concrete project outcomes. The Haiti investigation documented public claims and donor-facing messaging that were difficult to reconcile with concrete project outcomes. That warrants a severe Accountability Opacity penalty because material facts, risks, conflicts, ownership, or accountability information are obscured from the public. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 0 scored entries below, 52 tied, 174 above on Accountability Opacity. Linked evidence The Haiti investigation documented public claims and donor-facing messaging that were difficult to reconcile with concrete project outcomes. [10]

Bonus Credits

Bonus	Credit	Why this credit
Openness to Dissent ? Credit for tolerating internal, user, customer, worker, and public dissent without retaliation, capture, or viewpoint laundering.	1 / 3	Red Cross accountability is publicly visible through reporting and investigations, but donor and affected-community dissent does not directly govern the organization. Red Cross accountability is publicly visible through reporting and investigations, but donor and affected-community dissent does not directly govern the organization. That supports partial Openness to Dissent credit because people can criticize, dissent, or challenge the institution without being managed into silence. The value remains partial because the linked record does not show the practice as comprehensive, durable, or central enough for full credit. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 188 scored entries below, 11 tied, 27 above on Openness to Dissent. Linked evidence Red Cross accountability is publicly visible through reporting and investigations, but donor and affected-community dissent does not directly govern the organization. [3]
Constitutional Spirit ? Credit for respecting constitutional rights and civil-liberties norms even where private law does not strictly require it.	2 / 3	The Red Cross has a humanitarian mission and public charter obligations, but not democratic affected-community control. The Red Cross has a humanitarian mission and public charter obligations, but not democratic affected-community control. That supports partial Constitutional Spirit credit because the institution respects speech, privacy, due process, conscience, or civil-liberties norms beyond bare legal compulsion. The value remains partial because the linked record does not show the practice as comprehensive, durable, or central enough for full credit. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 188 scored entries below, 23 tied, 15 above on Constitutional Spirit. Linked evidence The Red Cross has a humanitarian mission and public charter obligations, but not democratic affected-community control. [4]
Good Deal ? Credit for unusually fair value: durable quality, fair pricing, low lock-in, and clear customer surplus.	2 / 3	The Red Cross provides disaster, blood, training, and emergency services with large public utility, despite accountability concerns. The Red Cross provides disaster, blood, training, and emergency services with large public utility, despite accountability concerns. That supports partial Good Deal credit because ordinary users receive unusually fair value, durability, access, or surplus. The value remains partial because the linked record does not show the practice as comprehensive, durable, or central enough for full credit. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 185 scored entries below, 14 tied, 27 above on Good Deal. Linked evidence The Red Cross provides disaster, blood, training, and emergency services with large public utility, despite accountability concerns. [5]
Cost Transparency ? Credit for clear posted prices, all-in fees, unit costs, public rate cards, margin/cost visibility, or surplus-allocation transparency, especially in markets where opaque quotes, hidden fees, or individualized pricing are normal.	1 / 3	The Red Cross publishes annual reports, but major project-level disaster-relief accountability has been criticized as insufficient. The Red Cross publishes annual reports, but major project-level disaster-relief accountability has been criticized as insufficient. That supports partial Cost Transparency credit because pricing, margins, fees, funding, or surplus allocation are made meaningfully legible. The value remains partial because the linked record does not show the practice as comprehensive, durable, or central enough for full credit. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 189 scored entries below, 11 tied, 26 above on Cost Transparency. Linked evidence The Red Cross publishes annual reports, but major project-level disaster-relief accountability has been criticized as insufficient. [6]

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

Medium 70/100

11 verified linked claims 10 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 10/17 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 13/20

11 verified linked claims

Source quality 13/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 9/18

10 direct claims across 17 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 6/10

10/17 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending

VerificationUnverified

ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)

ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)

Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.

Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

1The American Red Cross describes a mission to prevent and alleviate human suffering through disaster relief, blood services, training, service to armed forces, and international services.

Governance Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 7, 2026

American Red Cross Mission and ValuesGeneral web source · 58%

2The American Red Cross publishes annual reports and financial statements for its humanitarian and blood-service operations.

Product Integrity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 7, 2026

American Red Cross Annual ReportPrimary institutional record · 90%

3Red Cross accountability is publicly visible through reporting and investigations, but donor and affected-community dissent does not directly govern the organization.

Openness To Dissent Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 7, 2026

American Red Cross Annual ReportPrimary institutional record · 90%

4The Red Cross has a humanitarian mission and public charter obligations, but not democratic affected-community control.

Constitutional Spirit Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 7, 2026

American Red Cross Mission and ValuesGeneral web source · 58%

5The Red Cross provides disaster, blood, training, and emergency services with large public utility, despite accountability concerns.

Good Deal Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 7, 2026

American Red Cross Mission and ValuesGeneral web source · 58%

6The Red Cross publishes annual reports, but major project-level disaster-relief accountability has been criticized as insufficient.

Cost Transparency Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 7, 2026

American Red Cross Annual ReportPrimary institutional record · 90%
ProPublica/NPR Haiti Red Cross investigationIndependent reporting · 82%

7The organization’s positive conduct depends materially on current leadership, nonprofit or platform policy, accreditation rules, religious culture, or discretionary operating practice rather than on locked worker or affected-stakeholder control.

Reversibility Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 7, 2026

American Red Cross Mission and ValuesGeneral web source · 58%

8A ProPublica/NPR investigation reported severe shortfalls in the Red Cross Haiti earthquake response, including raising about half a billion dollars while building only a small number of permanent homes.

Human Harm Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 7, 2026

ProPublica/NPR Haiti Red Cross investigationIndependent reporting · 82%

9Large disaster, blood, and logistics operations create ecological impact, though ecological extraction is not the core purpose.

Ecological Harm Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 7, 2026

American Red Cross Mission and ValuesGeneral web source · 58%

10The Haiti investigation documented public claims and donor-facing messaging that were difficult to reconcile with concrete project outcomes.

Accountability Opacity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 7, 2026

ProPublica/NPR Haiti Red Cross investigationIndependent reporting · 82%

11American Red Cross's public materials state a mission, values, ownership model, advocacy role, or institutional standpoint plainly enough that this record does not identify penalty-level neutrality theater.

Ideological Disavowal Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 9, 2026

AI scaffold

American Red Cross official siteGeneral web source · 58%
American Red Cross Mission and ValuesGeneral web source · 58%
American Red Cross Annual ReportPrimary institutional record · 90%

Alternatives

Competitors

AGOOD65 FoodFinder national food pantry locator nonprofit · same market AGOOD65 National Runaway Safeline 24/7 youth crisis and runaway support line · same market AGOOD65 RAINN national sexual assault hotline and survivor-support nonprofit · same market AGOOD64 StrongHearts Native Helpline Native domestic and sexual violence helpline · same market AGOOD62 National Domestic Violence Hotline 24/7 domestic violence support hotline and resource directory · same market AGOOD61 GiveDirectly humanitarian cash-transfer nonprofit · same market AGOOD60 DonorsChoose education fundraising nonprofit · same market AGOOD59 Undue Medical Debt nonprofit medical-debt relief organization · same market

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for American Red Cross Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

May 7, 2026 at 12:00 AM UTC ai-scaffolding directory-expansion

Added source-backed evaluation during accreditation/watchdog, charity/humanitarian, fundraising-platform, and religious-institution expansion pass.

View Full Audit Log