professional association for authors
Authors Guild
Industry Publishing
A nonprofit professional association advocating for writers’ rights, contracts, copyright, free expression, and author income. Authors Guild scores positively because it increases writer bargaining power against publishers, platforms, and AI/data extraction.
Why this matters: The Authors Guild is a strong author institution because it shifts some power toward writers, though it remains a professional association rather than democratic publishing infrastructure.
Letter grade B Qualified Medium confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1
* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.
Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.
Evaluation Overview
B - Qualified
The score turns mainly on Extraction, with the largest penalty coming from Reversibility.
Strengths
- Extraction7/10
- Ownership6/10
- Governance6/10
Penalties
- Reversibility-5
- Accountability Opacity-2
Evidence state
- ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)
- ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
- Linked claims10
- Direct axis claims8
- Coverage8/15
Scoring Axes
| Axis | Score | Why this score |
|---|---|---|
Ownership
?
Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control
at 10.
|
6 / 10 |
The Authors Guild is a nonprofit professional association for writers rather than a publisher or retail platform. Linked evidence
|
Governance
?
Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic
stakeholder control at 10.
|
6 / 10 |
The Authors Guild is a nonprofit professional association for writers rather than a publisher or retail platform. Linked evidence
|
Extraction
?
Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured
extraction judgment.
|
7 / 10 |
The Authors Guild is a nonprofit professional association for writers rather than a publisher or retail platform. Linked evidence
|
Labor Sovereignty
?
Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at
7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence
shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling,
retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of
worker voice, or extreme turnover.
|
5 / 7 |
The Authors Guild is a nonprofit professional association for writers rather than a publisher or retail platform. Linked evidence
|
Solidarity with the
Unemployed
?
Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment,
and non-competes.
|
5 / 7 |
The Authors Guild is a nonprofit professional association for writers rather than a publisher or retail platform. Linked evidence
|
Loss-Bearing Fidelity
?
Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and
public obligations.
|
6 / 7 |
The Authors Guild is a nonprofit professional association for writers rather than a publisher or retail platform. Linked evidence
|
Market Conduct
?
Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.
|
4 / 5 |
The Authors Guild is a nonprofit professional association for writers rather than a publisher or retail platform. Linked evidence
|
Product Integrity
?
Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.
|
5 / 5 |
The Authors Guild provides advocacy, contract guidance, legal resources, model clauses, and public-policy work for authors. Linked evidence
|
Scale Integrity
?
Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.
|
4 / 5 |
The Authors Guild is a nonprofit professional association for writers rather than a publisher or retail platform. Linked evidence
|
Penalties
| Penalty | Applied | Why this penalty |
|---|---|---|
Reversibility
?
Applied when positive conduct depends on current living leaders,
founders, family owners, or other person-contingent governance rather
than durable structure. Range: -5 to 0.
|
-5 |
Association effectiveness depends on leadership, member priorities, and funding. Linked evidence
|
Accountability Opacity
?
Material opacity, reputation laundering, or hidden accountability
structures that prevent public accountability. Range: -2 to 0.
|
-2 |
Internal governance and policy tradeoffs are only partly transparent to nonmembers. Linked evidence
|
Bonus Credits
| Bonus | Credit | Why this credit |
|---|---|---|
Openness to Dissent
?
Credit for tolerating internal, user, customer, worker, and public
dissent without retaliation, capture, or viewpoint laundering.
|
1 / 3 |
Author-rights advocacy supports dissent against platform, publisher, and contractual overreach. Linked evidence
|
Constitutional Spirit
?
Credit for respecting constitutional rights and civil-liberties norms
even where private law does not strictly require it.
|
2 / 3 |
The Authors Guild’s free-expression and copyright advocacy supports public-sphere and civil-liberties norms. Linked evidence
|
Good Deal
?
Credit for unusually fair value: durable quality, fair pricing, low
lock-in, and clear customer surplus.
|
1 / 3 |
Membership resources and public advocacy create real value for working writers. Linked evidence
|
Cost Transparency
?
Credit for clear posted prices, all-in fees, unit costs, public rate
cards, margin/cost visibility, or surplus-allocation transparency,
especially in markets where opaque quotes, hidden fees, or
individualized pricing are normal.
|
1 / 3 |
Contract and author-income resources improve visibility into publishing economics. Linked evidence
|
Confidence Basis
Confidence Basis
Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.
Medium 67/100
10 verified linked claims 8 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 8/15 components covered
This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.
Claim confidence 13/20
10 verified linked claims
Source quality 10/18
Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability
Direct axis-specific claims 9/18
8 direct claims across 15 active components
Dispute load 12/12
0 disputed claims on this entity
Recency 10/10
Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026
Reviewer status 7/12
Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding
Component coverage 5/10
8/15 evidence-bearing components have direct support
Evidence State
Evidence State
Claims and Sources
Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.
* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.1The Authors Guild is a nonprofit professional association for writers rather than a publisher or retail platform.
- Authors GuildGeneral web source · 58%
- Authors Guild advocacyGeneral web source · 58%
2The Authors Guild provides advocacy, contract guidance, legal resources, model clauses, and public-policy work for authors.
- Authors GuildGeneral web source · 58%
- Authors Guild advocacyGeneral web source · 58%
3The organization improves author bargaining power but does not itself solve publishing ownership or distribution concentration.
- Authors GuildGeneral web source · 58%
- Authors Guild advocacyGeneral web source · 58%
4Author-rights advocacy supports dissent against platform, publisher, and contractual overreach.
- Authors GuildGeneral web source · 58%
- Authors Guild advocacyGeneral web source · 58%
5The Authors Guild’s free-expression and copyright advocacy supports public-sphere and civil-liberties norms.
- Authors GuildGeneral web source · 58%
- Authors Guild advocacyGeneral web source · 58%
6Membership resources and public advocacy create real value for working writers.
- Authors GuildGeneral web source · 58%
- Authors Guild advocacyGeneral web source · 58%
7Contract and author-income resources improve visibility into publishing economics.
- Authors GuildGeneral web source · 58%
- Authors Guild advocacyGeneral web source · 58%
8Association effectiveness depends on leadership, member priorities, and funding.
- Authors GuildGeneral web source · 58%
- Authors Guild advocacyGeneral web source · 58%
9Internal governance and policy tradeoffs are only partly transparent to nonmembers.
- Authors GuildGeneral web source · 58%
- Authors Guild advocacyGeneral web source · 58%
10Authors Guild's public materials state a mission, values, ownership model, advocacy role, or institutional standpoint plainly enough that this record does not identify penalty-level neutrality theater.
- Authors Guild official siteGeneral web source · 58%
- Authors Guild advocacyGeneral web source · 58%
Help Improve This Profile
Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.
How This Page Is Maintained
Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.
Civic Note
Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.
Submit evidence for Authors Guild Add one source-backed fact for review.
Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.
Audit Log
Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.
No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.
View Full Audit Log