old-guard seed and plant catalog company

Burpee

An old-guard seed, plant, and gardening-supply retailer selling vegetable, herb, fruit, flower, perennial, and garden products online, in catalogs, and through retail channels. Burpee has genuine horticultural history and useful products, but it scores low because private control, opaque sourcing, catalog marketing, and retail scale do not create accountable power for workers, growers, or customers.

Why this matters: Burpee is a familiar default; the directory needs to show why default availability is not the same as goodness.

Letter grade D Extractive High confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1 Last reviewed May 13, 2026

Final Score 19* D - Extractive

DEXTRACTIVE19 pts

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material26

Bonus+0

Cap35Ownership <= 2 and Governance <= 2

After Cap26

Penalties-7

!Not Verified

Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Evaluation Overview

D - Extractive

The score turns mainly on Scale Integrity, with the largest penalty coming from Accountability Opacity.

Strengths

Scale Integrity5/5
Extraction3/10
Solidarity with the Unemployed3/7

Penalties

Accountability Opacity-2
Toxic Products-1
Shrinkflation-1
Price Manipulation-1

Evidence state

ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Linked claims15
Direct axis claims15
Coverage15/15

Scoring Axes

Axis	Score	Why this score
Ownership ? Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.	2 / 10	Burpee's public record identifies its ownership form or parent relationship in the online gardening, seed, nursery, or greenhouse market. Burpee's public record identifies its ownership form or parent relationship in the online gardening, seed, nursery, or greenhouse market. On Ownership, Burpee belongs low because useful garden products are being delivered through private, founder-led, acquired, catalog-rollup, or large supplier structures. The garden value prevents a floor score, but it does not by itself create accountable institutional power. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Online gardening pass calibrated across cooperative seed companies, nonprofit seed preservation, old catalog retailers, creator-commerce gardening stores, nurseries, and greenhouse suppliers. Linked evidence Burpee's public record identifies its ownership form or parent relationship in the online gardening, seed, nursery, or greenhouse market. [1] context Burpee's public materials indicate whether control sits with workers, consumers, a nonprofit board, a family owner, a founder, a private acquirer, or a parent company. [2] context Burpee's model determines whether gardening value is routed through cooperative, nonprofit, employee-owned, small-farm, creator-commerce, catalog-rollup, or private supplier structures. [3] context Burpee's reviewed public record shows the degree to which workers have binding ownership or governance power rather than ordinary employment status. [4] context Burpee's products or services can support home food growing, seed saving, small farms, school gardens, community gardens, or lower-cost self-provisioning. [5] context Burpee's public model and product promises affect whether customers carry the risk of crop failure, poor germination, weak plants, shipping damage, bad advice, or expensive equipment mistakes. [6] context Burpee operates in a market where gardeners often rely on trust, variety descriptions, seed counts, guarantees, regional adaptation claims, and replacement policies before they can verify quality. [7] context Burpee's core product integrity depends on seed viability, plant health, accurate variety representation, durable supplies, transparent sourcing, and useful growing information. [8] context Burpee's scale, distribution, catalog reach, content audience, or installation capacity affects whether its gardening work remains educative and accountable or becomes extractive retail infrastructure. [9]
Governance ? Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.	2 / 10	Burpee's public materials indicate whether control sits with workers, consumers, a nonprofit board, a family owner, a founder, a private acquirer, or a parent company. Burpee's public materials indicate whether control sits with workers, consumers, a nonprofit board, a family owner, a founder, a private acquirer, or a parent company. On Governance, Burpee belongs low because useful garden products are being delivered through private, founder-led, acquired, catalog-rollup, or large supplier structures. The garden value prevents a floor score, but it does not by itself create accountable institutional power. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Online gardening pass calibrated across cooperative seed companies, nonprofit seed preservation, old catalog retailers, creator-commerce gardening stores, nurseries, and greenhouse suppliers. Linked evidence context Burpee's public record identifies its ownership form or parent relationship in the online gardening, seed, nursery, or greenhouse market. [1] Burpee's public materials indicate whether control sits with workers, consumers, a nonprofit board, a family owner, a founder, a private acquirer, or a parent company. [2] context Burpee's model determines whether gardening value is routed through cooperative, nonprofit, employee-owned, small-farm, creator-commerce, catalog-rollup, or private supplier structures. [3] context Burpee's reviewed public record shows the degree to which workers have binding ownership or governance power rather than ordinary employment status. [4] context Burpee's products or services can support home food growing, seed saving, small farms, school gardens, community gardens, or lower-cost self-provisioning. [5] context Burpee's public model and product promises affect whether customers carry the risk of crop failure, poor germination, weak plants, shipping damage, bad advice, or expensive equipment mistakes. [6] context Burpee operates in a market where gardeners often rely on trust, variety descriptions, seed counts, guarantees, regional adaptation claims, and replacement policies before they can verify quality. [7] context Burpee's core product integrity depends on seed viability, plant health, accurate variety representation, durable supplies, transparent sourcing, and useful growing information. [8] context Burpee's scale, distribution, catalog reach, content audience, or installation capacity affects whether its gardening work remains educative and accountable or becomes extractive retail infrastructure. [9]
Extraction ? Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.	3 / 10	Burpee's model determines whether gardening value is routed through cooperative, nonprofit, employee-owned, small-farm, creator-commerce, catalog-rollup, or private supplier structures. Burpee's model determines whether gardening value is routed through cooperative, nonprofit, employee-owned, small-farm, creator-commerce, catalog-rollup, or private supplier structures. On Extraction, Burpee belongs low because useful garden products are being delivered through private, founder-led, acquired, catalog-rollup, or large supplier structures. The garden value prevents a floor score, but it does not by itself create accountable institutional power. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Online gardening pass calibrated across cooperative seed companies, nonprofit seed preservation, old catalog retailers, creator-commerce gardening stores, nurseries, and greenhouse suppliers. Linked evidence context Burpee's public record identifies its ownership form or parent relationship in the online gardening, seed, nursery, or greenhouse market. [1] context Burpee's public materials indicate whether control sits with workers, consumers, a nonprofit board, a family owner, a founder, a private acquirer, or a parent company. [2] Burpee's model determines whether gardening value is routed through cooperative, nonprofit, employee-owned, small-farm, creator-commerce, catalog-rollup, or private supplier structures. [3] context Burpee's reviewed public record shows the degree to which workers have binding ownership or governance power rather than ordinary employment status. [4] context Burpee's products or services can support home food growing, seed saving, small farms, school gardens, community gardens, or lower-cost self-provisioning. [5] context Burpee's public model and product promises affect whether customers carry the risk of crop failure, poor germination, weak plants, shipping damage, bad advice, or expensive equipment mistakes. [6] context Burpee operates in a market where gardeners often rely on trust, variety descriptions, seed counts, guarantees, regional adaptation claims, and replacement policies before they can verify quality. [7] context Burpee's core product integrity depends on seed viability, plant health, accurate variety representation, durable supplies, transparent sourcing, and useful growing information. [8] context Burpee's scale, distribution, catalog reach, content audience, or installation capacity affects whether its gardening work remains educative and accountable or becomes extractive retail infrastructure. [9]
Labor Sovereignty ? Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.	2 / 7	Burpee's reviewed public record shows the degree to which workers have binding ownership or governance power rather than ordinary employment status. Burpee's reviewed public record shows the degree to which workers have binding ownership or governance power rather than ordinary employment status. On Labor Sovereignty, Burpee belongs low because useful garden products are being delivered through private, founder-led, acquired, catalog-rollup, or large supplier structures. The garden value prevents a floor score, but it does not by itself create accountable institutional power. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Online gardening pass calibrated across cooperative seed companies, nonprofit seed preservation, old catalog retailers, creator-commerce gardening stores, nurseries, and greenhouse suppliers. Linked evidence context Burpee's public record identifies its ownership form or parent relationship in the online gardening, seed, nursery, or greenhouse market. [1] context Burpee's public materials indicate whether control sits with workers, consumers, a nonprofit board, a family owner, a founder, a private acquirer, or a parent company. [2] context Burpee's model determines whether gardening value is routed through cooperative, nonprofit, employee-owned, small-farm, creator-commerce, catalog-rollup, or private supplier structures. [3] Burpee's reviewed public record shows the degree to which workers have binding ownership or governance power rather than ordinary employment status. [4] context Burpee's products or services can support home food growing, seed saving, small farms, school gardens, community gardens, or lower-cost self-provisioning. [5] context Burpee's public model and product promises affect whether customers carry the risk of crop failure, poor germination, weak plants, shipping damage, bad advice, or expensive equipment mistakes. [6] context Burpee operates in a market where gardeners often rely on trust, variety descriptions, seed counts, guarantees, regional adaptation claims, and replacement policies before they can verify quality. [7] context Burpee's core product integrity depends on seed viability, plant health, accurate variety representation, durable supplies, transparent sourcing, and useful growing information. [8] context Burpee's scale, distribution, catalog reach, content audience, or installation capacity affects whether its gardening work remains educative and accountable or becomes extractive retail infrastructure. [9]
Solidarity with the Unemployed ? Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.	3 / 7	Burpee's products or services can support home food growing, seed saving, small farms, school gardens, community gardens, or lower-cost self-provisioning. Burpee's products or services can support home food growing, seed saving, small farms, school gardens, community gardens, or lower-cost self-provisioning. On Solidarity with the Unemployed, Burpee belongs low because useful garden products are being delivered through private, founder-led, acquired, catalog-rollup, or large supplier structures. The garden value prevents a floor score, but it does not by itself create accountable institutional power. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Online gardening pass calibrated across cooperative seed companies, nonprofit seed preservation, old catalog retailers, creator-commerce gardening stores, nurseries, and greenhouse suppliers. Linked evidence context Burpee's public record identifies its ownership form or parent relationship in the online gardening, seed, nursery, or greenhouse market. [1] context Burpee's public materials indicate whether control sits with workers, consumers, a nonprofit board, a family owner, a founder, a private acquirer, or a parent company. [2] context Burpee's model determines whether gardening value is routed through cooperative, nonprofit, employee-owned, small-farm, creator-commerce, catalog-rollup, or private supplier structures. [3] context Burpee's reviewed public record shows the degree to which workers have binding ownership or governance power rather than ordinary employment status. [4] Burpee's products or services can support home food growing, seed saving, small farms, school gardens, community gardens, or lower-cost self-provisioning. [5] context Burpee's public model and product promises affect whether customers carry the risk of crop failure, poor germination, weak plants, shipping damage, bad advice, or expensive equipment mistakes. [6] context Burpee operates in a market where gardeners often rely on trust, variety descriptions, seed counts, guarantees, regional adaptation claims, and replacement policies before they can verify quality. [7] context Burpee's core product integrity depends on seed viability, plant health, accurate variety representation, durable supplies, transparent sourcing, and useful growing information. [8] context Burpee's scale, distribution, catalog reach, content audience, or installation capacity affects whether its gardening work remains educative and accountable or becomes extractive retail infrastructure. [9]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity ? Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.	3 / 7	Burpee's public model and product promises affect whether customers carry the risk of crop failure, poor germination, weak plants, shipping damage, bad advice, or expensive equipment mistakes. Burpee's public model and product promises affect whether customers carry the risk of crop failure, poor germination, weak plants, shipping damage, bad advice, or expensive equipment mistakes. On Loss-Bearing Fidelity, Burpee belongs low because useful garden products are being delivered through private, founder-led, acquired, catalog-rollup, or large supplier structures. The garden value prevents a floor score, but it does not by itself create accountable institutional power. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Online gardening pass calibrated across cooperative seed companies, nonprofit seed preservation, old catalog retailers, creator-commerce gardening stores, nurseries, and greenhouse suppliers. Linked evidence context Burpee's public record identifies its ownership form or parent relationship in the online gardening, seed, nursery, or greenhouse market. [1] context Burpee's public materials indicate whether control sits with workers, consumers, a nonprofit board, a family owner, a founder, a private acquirer, or a parent company. [2] context Burpee's model determines whether gardening value is routed through cooperative, nonprofit, employee-owned, small-farm, creator-commerce, catalog-rollup, or private supplier structures. [3] context Burpee's reviewed public record shows the degree to which workers have binding ownership or governance power rather than ordinary employment status. [4] context Burpee's products or services can support home food growing, seed saving, small farms, school gardens, community gardens, or lower-cost self-provisioning. [5] Burpee's public model and product promises affect whether customers carry the risk of crop failure, poor germination, weak plants, shipping damage, bad advice, or expensive equipment mistakes. [6] context Burpee operates in a market where gardeners often rely on trust, variety descriptions, seed counts, guarantees, regional adaptation claims, and replacement policies before they can verify quality. [7] context Burpee's core product integrity depends on seed viability, plant health, accurate variety representation, durable supplies, transparent sourcing, and useful growing information. [8] context Burpee's scale, distribution, catalog reach, content audience, or installation capacity affects whether its gardening work remains educative and accountable or becomes extractive retail infrastructure. [9]
Market Conduct ? Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.	3 / 5	Burpee operates in a market where gardeners often rely on trust, variety descriptions, seed counts, guarantees, regional adaptation claims, and replacement policies before they can verify quality. Burpee operates in a market where gardeners often rely on trust, variety descriptions, seed counts, guarantees, regional adaptation claims, and replacement policies before they can verify quality. On Market Conduct, Burpee belongs low because useful garden products are being delivered through private, founder-led, acquired, catalog-rollup, or large supplier structures. The garden value prevents a floor score, but it does not by itself create accountable institutional power. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Online gardening pass calibrated across cooperative seed companies, nonprofit seed preservation, old catalog retailers, creator-commerce gardening stores, nurseries, and greenhouse suppliers. Linked evidence context Burpee's public record identifies its ownership form or parent relationship in the online gardening, seed, nursery, or greenhouse market. [1] context Burpee's public materials indicate whether control sits with workers, consumers, a nonprofit board, a family owner, a founder, a private acquirer, or a parent company. [2] context Burpee's model determines whether gardening value is routed through cooperative, nonprofit, employee-owned, small-farm, creator-commerce, catalog-rollup, or private supplier structures. [3] context Burpee's reviewed public record shows the degree to which workers have binding ownership or governance power rather than ordinary employment status. [4] context Burpee's products or services can support home food growing, seed saving, small farms, school gardens, community gardens, or lower-cost self-provisioning. [5] context Burpee's public model and product promises affect whether customers carry the risk of crop failure, poor germination, weak plants, shipping damage, bad advice, or expensive equipment mistakes. [6] Burpee operates in a market where gardeners often rely on trust, variety descriptions, seed counts, guarantees, regional adaptation claims, and replacement policies before they can verify quality. [7] context Burpee's core product integrity depends on seed viability, plant health, accurate variety representation, durable supplies, transparent sourcing, and useful growing information. [8] context Burpee's scale, distribution, catalog reach, content audience, or installation capacity affects whether its gardening work remains educative and accountable or becomes extractive retail infrastructure. [9]
Product Integrity ? Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.	3 / 5	Burpee's core product integrity depends on seed viability, plant health, accurate variety representation, durable supplies, transparent sourcing, and useful growing information. Burpee's core product integrity depends on seed viability, plant health, accurate variety representation, durable supplies, transparent sourcing, and useful growing information. On Product Integrity, Burpee belongs low because useful garden products are being delivered through private, founder-led, acquired, catalog-rollup, or large supplier structures. The garden value prevents a floor score, but it does not by itself create accountable institutional power. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Online gardening pass calibrated across cooperative seed companies, nonprofit seed preservation, old catalog retailers, creator-commerce gardening stores, nurseries, and greenhouse suppliers. Linked evidence context Burpee's public record identifies its ownership form or parent relationship in the online gardening, seed, nursery, or greenhouse market. [1] context Burpee's public materials indicate whether control sits with workers, consumers, a nonprofit board, a family owner, a founder, a private acquirer, or a parent company. [2] context Burpee's model determines whether gardening value is routed through cooperative, nonprofit, employee-owned, small-farm, creator-commerce, catalog-rollup, or private supplier structures. [3] context Burpee's reviewed public record shows the degree to which workers have binding ownership or governance power rather than ordinary employment status. [4] context Burpee's products or services can support home food growing, seed saving, small farms, school gardens, community gardens, or lower-cost self-provisioning. [5] context Burpee's public model and product promises affect whether customers carry the risk of crop failure, poor germination, weak plants, shipping damage, bad advice, or expensive equipment mistakes. [6] context Burpee operates in a market where gardeners often rely on trust, variety descriptions, seed counts, guarantees, regional adaptation claims, and replacement policies before they can verify quality. [7] Burpee's core product integrity depends on seed viability, plant health, accurate variety representation, durable supplies, transparent sourcing, and useful growing information. [8] context Burpee's scale, distribution, catalog reach, content audience, or installation capacity affects whether its gardening work remains educative and accountable or becomes extractive retail infrastructure. [9]
Scale Integrity ? Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.	5 / 5	Burpee's scale, distribution, catalog reach, content audience, or installation capacity affects whether its gardening work remains educative and accountable or becomes extractive retail infrastructure. Burpee's scale, distribution, catalog reach, content audience, or installation capacity affects whether its gardening work remains educative and accountable or becomes extractive retail infrastructure. On Scale Integrity, Burpee sits in the positive middle: the products or services are materially useful for growing food or plants, and the institution shows some stewardship, durability, affordability, or mission discipline. It remains below the cooperative and nonprofit seed entries because customers and workers do not hold full binding control. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Online gardening pass calibrated across cooperative seed companies, nonprofit seed preservation, old catalog retailers, creator-commerce gardening stores, nurseries, and greenhouse suppliers. Linked evidence context Burpee's public record identifies its ownership form or parent relationship in the online gardening, seed, nursery, or greenhouse market. [1] context Burpee's public materials indicate whether control sits with workers, consumers, a nonprofit board, a family owner, a founder, a private acquirer, or a parent company. [2] context Burpee's model determines whether gardening value is routed through cooperative, nonprofit, employee-owned, small-farm, creator-commerce, catalog-rollup, or private supplier structures. [3] context Burpee's reviewed public record shows the degree to which workers have binding ownership or governance power rather than ordinary employment status. [4] context Burpee's products or services can support home food growing, seed saving, small farms, school gardens, community gardens, or lower-cost self-provisioning. [5] context Burpee's public model and product promises affect whether customers carry the risk of crop failure, poor germination, weak plants, shipping damage, bad advice, or expensive equipment mistakes. [6] context Burpee operates in a market where gardeners often rely on trust, variety descriptions, seed counts, guarantees, regional adaptation claims, and replacement policies before they can verify quality. [7] context Burpee's core product integrity depends on seed viability, plant health, accurate variety representation, durable supplies, transparent sourcing, and useful growing information. [8] Burpee's scale, distribution, catalog reach, content audience, or installation capacity affects whether its gardening work remains educative and accountable or becomes extractive retail infrastructure. [9]

Penalties

Penalty	Applied	Why this penalty
Toxic Products ? Current sale of products whose ordinary use, exposure, ingredients, residues, packaging, or formulation creates toxic, addictive, or consumer-safety risk. Food products receive at least light scrutiny for artificial colors, artificial flavors, petro-derived additives, pesticide residues, contaminants, endocrine-disrupting packaging, and ultra-processed formulation. Ordinary adult nightlife or alcohol service is not penalized by itself without evidence of predatory marketing, youth targeting, addiction-extractive design, or unusual product-safety misconduct. Range: -5 to 0.	-1	Burpee's public record makes Toxic Products relevant through its ownership structure, pricing, sourcing, subscriptions, content-to-commerce design, product-risk profile, pesticide/plastic exposure, or public controversy. Burpee's public record makes Toxic Products relevant through its ownership structure, pricing, sourcing, subscriptions, content-to-commerce design, product-risk profile, pesticide/plastic exposure, or public controversy. This warrants a Toxic Products penalty because the risk is tied to how the institution sells, sources, prices, markets, or governs gardening products, not merely to the existence of gardening commerce. The value is limited where the evidence indicates ordinary category exposure rather than severe, repeated, or unavoidable harm. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Online gardening pass calibrated across cooperative seed companies, nonprofit seed preservation, old catalog retailers, creator-commerce gardening stores, nurseries, and greenhouse suppliers. Linked evidence Burpee's public record makes Toxic Products relevant through its ownership structure, pricing, sourcing, subscriptions, content-to-commerce design, product-risk profile, pesticide/plastic exposure, or public controversy. [10]
Shrinkflation ? Reducing product quantity, count, usable volume, or package contents without a proportionate price reduction, especially when the change is not clearly announced at the shelf, package front, or purchase interface. Openly labeled size changes are less severe than quiet downsizing. Range: -5 to 0.	-1	Burpee's public record makes Shrinkflation relevant through its ownership structure, pricing, sourcing, subscriptions, content-to-commerce design, product-risk profile, pesticide/plastic exposure, or public controversy. Burpee's public record makes Shrinkflation relevant through its ownership structure, pricing, sourcing, subscriptions, content-to-commerce design, product-risk profile, pesticide/plastic exposure, or public controversy. This warrants a Shrinkflation penalty because the risk is tied to how the institution sells, sources, prices, markets, or governs gardening products, not merely to the existence of gardening commerce. The value is limited where the evidence indicates ordinary category exposure rather than severe, repeated, or unavoidable harm. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Online gardening pass calibrated across cooperative seed companies, nonprofit seed preservation, old catalog retailers, creator-commerce gardening stores, nurseries, and greenhouse suppliers. Linked evidence Burpee's public record makes Shrinkflation relevant through its ownership structure, pricing, sourcing, subscriptions, content-to-commerce design, product-risk profile, pesticide/plastic exposure, or public controversy. [11]
Price Manipulation ? Opaque, personalized, dynamic, urgency-based, algorithmic, hidden-fee, or market-power pricing that prevents customers from knowing the real price or exploits dependency, scarcity, or information asymmetry. Transparent posted pricing and genuinely public rate cards are not penalized here. Range: -5 to 0.	-1	Burpee's public record makes Price Manipulation relevant through its ownership structure, pricing, sourcing, subscriptions, content-to-commerce design, product-risk profile, pesticide/plastic exposure, or public controversy. Burpee's public record makes Price Manipulation relevant through its ownership structure, pricing, sourcing, subscriptions, content-to-commerce design, product-risk profile, pesticide/plastic exposure, or public controversy. This warrants a Price Manipulation penalty because the risk is tied to how the institution sells, sources, prices, markets, or governs gardening products, not merely to the existence of gardening commerce. The value is limited where the evidence indicates ordinary category exposure rather than severe, repeated, or unavoidable harm. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Online gardening pass calibrated across cooperative seed companies, nonprofit seed preservation, old catalog retailers, creator-commerce gardening stores, nurseries, and greenhouse suppliers. Linked evidence Burpee's public record makes Price Manipulation relevant through its ownership structure, pricing, sourcing, subscriptions, content-to-commerce design, product-risk profile, pesticide/plastic exposure, or public controversy. [12]
Unilateral Terms ? Non-negotiable clickthrough or adhesion terms that turn ordinary customer, user, subscriber, patient, tenant, or public-facing access into a one-sided contract, especially forced arbitration, class-action or mass-action waivers, unilateral modification, venue restrictions, broad indemnity, account termination discretion, or essential-service access conditioned on unreadable terms. Range: -5 to 0.	-1	Burpee's public record makes Unilateral Terms relevant through its ownership structure, pricing, sourcing, subscriptions, content-to-commerce design, product-risk profile, pesticide/plastic exposure, or public controversy. Burpee's public record makes Unilateral Terms relevant through its ownership structure, pricing, sourcing, subscriptions, content-to-commerce design, product-risk profile, pesticide/plastic exposure, or public controversy. This warrants a Unilateral Terms penalty because the risk is tied to how the institution sells, sources, prices, markets, or governs gardening products, not merely to the existence of gardening commerce. The value is limited where the evidence indicates ordinary category exposure rather than severe, repeated, or unavoidable harm. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Online gardening pass calibrated across cooperative seed companies, nonprofit seed preservation, old catalog retailers, creator-commerce gardening stores, nurseries, and greenhouse suppliers. Linked evidence Burpee's public record makes Unilateral Terms relevant through its ownership structure, pricing, sourcing, subscriptions, content-to-commerce design, product-risk profile, pesticide/plastic exposure, or public controversy. [13]
Accountability Opacity ? Material opacity, reputation laundering, or hidden accountability structures that prevent public accountability. Range: -2 to 0.	-2	Burpee's public record makes Accountability Opacity relevant through its ownership structure, pricing, sourcing, subscriptions, content-to-commerce design, product-risk profile, pesticide/plastic exposure, or public controversy. Burpee's public record makes Accountability Opacity relevant through its ownership structure, pricing, sourcing, subscriptions, content-to-commerce design, product-risk profile, pesticide/plastic exposure, or public controversy. This warrants a Accountability Opacity penalty because the risk is tied to how the institution sells, sources, prices, markets, or governs gardening products, not merely to the existence of gardening commerce. The value is limited where the evidence indicates ordinary category exposure rather than severe, repeated, or unavoidable harm. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Online gardening pass calibrated across cooperative seed companies, nonprofit seed preservation, old catalog retailers, creator-commerce gardening stores, nurseries, and greenhouse suppliers. Linked evidence Burpee's public record makes Accountability Opacity relevant through its ownership structure, pricing, sourcing, subscriptions, content-to-commerce design, product-risk profile, pesticide/plastic exposure, or public controversy. [14]
Identity Capture ? Customer pressure, employee pressure, and pervasive identity saturation. Range: -3 to 0.	-1	Burpee's public record makes Identity Capture relevant through its ownership structure, pricing, sourcing, subscriptions, content-to-commerce design, product-risk profile, pesticide/plastic exposure, or public controversy. Burpee's public record makes Identity Capture relevant through its ownership structure, pricing, sourcing, subscriptions, content-to-commerce design, product-risk profile, pesticide/plastic exposure, or public controversy. This warrants a Identity Capture penalty because the risk is tied to how the institution sells, sources, prices, markets, or governs gardening products, not merely to the existence of gardening commerce. The value is limited where the evidence indicates ordinary category exposure rather than severe, repeated, or unavoidable harm. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Online gardening pass calibrated across cooperative seed companies, nonprofit seed preservation, old catalog retailers, creator-commerce gardening stores, nurseries, and greenhouse suppliers. Linked evidence Burpee's public record makes Identity Capture relevant through its ownership structure, pricing, sourcing, subscriptions, content-to-commerce design, product-risk profile, pesticide/plastic exposure, or public controversy. [15]

Bonus Credits

No bonus credits applied in this version.

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

High 80/100

15 verified linked claims 15 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 15/15 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 16/20

15 verified linked claims

Source quality 11/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 14/18

15 direct claims across 15 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 10/10

15/15 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending

VerificationUnverified

ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)

ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)

Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.

Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

1Burpee's public record identifies its ownership form or parent relationship in the online gardening, seed, nursery, or greenhouse market.

Ownership Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Burpee aboutOfficial self-description · 68%

2Burpee's public materials indicate whether control sits with workers, consumers, a nonprofit board, a family owner, a founder, a private acquirer, or a parent company.

Governance Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Burpee aboutOfficial self-description · 68%

3Burpee's model determines whether gardening value is routed through cooperative, nonprofit, employee-owned, small-farm, creator-commerce, catalog-rollup, or private supplier structures.

Extraction Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Burpee aboutOfficial self-description · 68%

4Burpee's reviewed public record shows the degree to which workers have binding ownership or governance power rather than ordinary employment status.

Labor Sovereignty Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Burpee aboutOfficial self-description · 68%

5Burpee's products or services can support home food growing, seed saving, small farms, school gardens, community gardens, or lower-cost self-provisioning.

Solidarity Unemployed Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Burpee company historyGeneral web source · 58%

6Burpee's public model and product promises affect whether customers carry the risk of crop failure, poor germination, weak plants, shipping damage, bad advice, or expensive equipment mistakes.

Loss Bearing Fidelity Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Burpee company historyGeneral web source · 58%

7Burpee operates in a market where gardeners often rely on trust, variety descriptions, seed counts, guarantees, regional adaptation claims, and replacement policies before they can verify quality.

Market Conduct Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Burpee company historyGeneral web source · 58%

8Burpee's core product integrity depends on seed viability, plant health, accurate variety representation, durable supplies, transparent sourcing, and useful growing information.

Product Integrity Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Burpee aboutOfficial self-description · 68%

9Burpee's scale, distribution, catalog reach, content audience, or installation capacity affects whether its gardening work remains educative and accountable or becomes extractive retail infrastructure.

Scale Integrity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Burpee company historyGeneral web source · 58%

10Burpee's public record makes Toxic Products relevant through its ownership structure, pricing, sourcing, subscriptions, content-to-commerce design, product-risk profile, pesticide/plastic exposure, or public controversy.

Toxic Products Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Burpee company historyGeneral web source · 58%

11Burpee's public record makes Shrinkflation relevant through its ownership structure, pricing, sourcing, subscriptions, content-to-commerce design, product-risk profile, pesticide/plastic exposure, or public controversy.

Shrinkflation Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Burpee company historyGeneral web source · 58%

12Burpee's public record makes Price Manipulation relevant through its ownership structure, pricing, sourcing, subscriptions, content-to-commerce design, product-risk profile, pesticide/plastic exposure, or public controversy.

Price Manipulation Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Burpee company historyGeneral web source · 58%

13Burpee's public record makes Unilateral Terms relevant through its ownership structure, pricing, sourcing, subscriptions, content-to-commerce design, product-risk profile, pesticide/plastic exposure, or public controversy.

Unilateral Terms Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Burpee company historyGeneral web source · 58%

14Burpee's public record makes Accountability Opacity relevant through its ownership structure, pricing, sourcing, subscriptions, content-to-commerce design, product-risk profile, pesticide/plastic exposure, or public controversy.

Accountability Opacity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Burpee company historyGeneral web source · 58%

15Burpee's public record makes Identity Capture relevant through its ownership structure, pricing, sourcing, subscriptions, content-to-commerce design, product-risk profile, pesticide/plastic exposure, or public controversy.

Identity Capture Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Burpee company historyGeneral web source · 58%

Alternatives

Competitors

AGOOD61 Fedco Seeds worker- and consumer-owned seed cooperative · same market AGOOD60 Seed Savers Exchange nonprofit heirloom seed-preservation organization · same market AGOOD59 Southern Exposure Seed Exchange worker-owned heirloom and organic seed company · same market AGOOD57 Experimental Farm Network nonprofit cooperative seed network and seed store · same market AGOOD52 Johnny's Selected Seeds employee-owned seed and garden-supply company · same market BQUALIFIED47 High Mowing Organic Seeds organic seed company · same market BQUALIFIED46 Growing Spaces passive-solar greenhouse manufacturer · same market BQUALIFIED45 Adaptive Seeds farm-based organic seed company · same market

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for Burpee Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.

View Full Audit Log