private agribusiness and food-ingredients company

Cargill

Industry Food

A giant privately held agribusiness and food-ingredients company operating across grain, meat, cocoa, oils, trading, and supply-chain services. Cargill scores low because of documented human harm, ecological harm, and person-dependent governance, with centralized governance and weak worker power reinforcing the negative evaluation.

Why this matters: Cargill is a bad food-system actor because private dynastic control sits over enormous commodity power, opaque supply chains, and repeated cocoa, deforestation, and labor-risk controversies.

Letter grade F Malignant Medium confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1 Last reviewed May 10, 2026

Final Score -19* F - Malignant

FMALIGNANT-19 pts

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material18

Bonus+0

Cap35Ownership <= 2 and Governance <= 2

After Cap18

Penalties-37

!Not Verified

Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Evaluation Overview

F - Malignant

The score turns mainly on Extraction, with the largest penalty coming from Ecological Harm.

Strengths

Extraction3/10
Market Conduct3/5
Product Integrity3/5

Penalties

Ecological Harm-12
Human Harm-8
Policy Capture-6
Reversibility-5

Evidence state

ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Linked claims9
Direct axis claims9
Coverage9/16

Scoring Axes

Axis	Score	Why this score
Ownership ? Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.	1 / 10	Cargill is a very large privately held agribusiness company, so public accountability and stakeholder control are structurally weaker than in cooperatives or public-interest food institutions. Cargill is a very large privately held agribusiness company, so public accountability and stakeholder control are structurally weaker than in cooperatives or public-interest food institutions. That keeps Cargill low on Ownership: decisive control remains with shareholders, private owners, executives, or state insiders rather than affected people. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Linked evidence Cargill is a very large privately held agribusiness company, so public accountability and stakeholder control are structurally weaker than in cooperatives or public-interest food institutions. [1]
Governance ? Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.	1 / 10	Cargill is a very large privately held agribusiness company, so public accountability and stakeholder control are structurally weaker than in cooperatives or public-interest food institutions. Cargill is a very large privately held agribusiness company, so public accountability and stakeholder control are structurally weaker than in cooperatives or public-interest food institutions. That keeps Cargill low on Governance: ordinary users, workers, customers, or affected communities cannot change the rules that govern them. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Linked evidence context Cargill is a very large privately held agribusiness company, so public accountability and stakeholder control are structurally weaker than in cooperatives or public-interest food institutions. [1]
Extraction ? Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.	3 / 10	Cargill is a very large privately held agribusiness company, so public accountability and stakeholder control are structurally weaker than in cooperatives or public-interest food institutions. Cargill is a very large privately held agribusiness company, so public accountability and stakeholder control are structurally weaker than in cooperatives or public-interest food institutions. That keeps Cargill low on Extraction: the business model makes extraction from workers, users, suppliers, customers, or the public central rather than incidental. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Linked evidence context Cargill is a very large privately held agribusiness company, so public accountability and stakeholder control are structurally weaker than in cooperatives or public-interest food institutions. [1] context AP reported litigation and advocacy efforts over child-labor cocoa imports involving companies including Cargill, with allegations that cocoa harvested by children can enter major chocolate supply chains. [2] context Cargill connects farmers, food workers, commodity markets, ingredients, animal protein, and customers across the food system, making it a core food-infrastructure intermediary rather than a simple consumer brand. [3]
Labor Sovereignty ? Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.	1 / 7	Cargill is a very large privately held agribusiness company, so public accountability and stakeholder control are structurally weaker than in cooperatives or public-interest food institutions. Cargill is a very large privately held agribusiness company, so public accountability and stakeholder control are structurally weaker than in cooperatives or public-interest food institutions. That keeps Cargill low on Labor Sovereignty: labor remains managerially controlled, replaceable, or exposed to coercive employment and contracting conditions. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Linked evidence context Cargill is a very large privately held agribusiness company, so public accountability and stakeholder control are structurally weaker than in cooperatives or public-interest food institutions. [1] context AP reported litigation and advocacy efforts over child-labor cocoa imports involving companies including Cargill, with allegations that cocoa harvested by children can enter major chocolate supply chains. [2] context Cargill connects farmers, food workers, commodity markets, ingredients, animal protein, and customers across the food system, making it a core food-infrastructure intermediary rather than a simple consumer brand. [3]
Solidarity with the Unemployed ? Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.	1 / 7	Cargill is a very large privately held agribusiness company, so public accountability and stakeholder control are structurally weaker than in cooperatives or public-interest food institutions. Cargill is a very large privately held agribusiness company, so public accountability and stakeholder control are structurally weaker than in cooperatives or public-interest food institutions. That keeps Cargill low on Solidarity with the Unemployed: the model provides little protection for people who leave, are excluded, or cannot bargain from employment. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Linked evidence context Cargill is a very large privately held agribusiness company, so public accountability and stakeholder control are structurally weaker than in cooperatives or public-interest food institutions. [1] context AP reported litigation and advocacy efforts over child-labor cocoa imports involving companies including Cargill, with allegations that cocoa harvested by children can enter major chocolate supply chains. [2] context Cargill connects farmers, food workers, commodity markets, ingredients, animal protein, and customers across the food system, making it a core food-infrastructure intermediary rather than a simple consumer brand. [3]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity ? Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.	2 / 7	Cargill is a very large privately held agribusiness company, so public accountability and stakeholder control are structurally weaker than in cooperatives or public-interest food institutions. Cargill is a very large privately held agribusiness company, so public accountability and stakeholder control are structurally weaker than in cooperatives or public-interest food institutions. That keeps Cargill low on Loss-Bearing Fidelity: losses, hazards, or adjustment costs are routinely pushed onto workers, customers, suppliers, communities, or the public. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Linked evidence context Cargill is a very large privately held agribusiness company, so public accountability and stakeholder control are structurally weaker than in cooperatives or public-interest food institutions. [1] context AP reported litigation and advocacy efforts over child-labor cocoa imports involving companies including Cargill, with allegations that cocoa harvested by children can enter major chocolate supply chains. [2] context Cargill connects farmers, food workers, commodity markets, ingredients, animal protein, and customers across the food system, making it a core food-infrastructure intermediary rather than a simple consumer brand. [3]
Market Conduct ? Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.	3 / 5	Cargill connects farmers, food workers, commodity markets, ingredients, animal protein, and customers across the food system, making it a core food-infrastructure intermediary rather than a simple consumer brand. Cargill connects farmers, food workers, commodity markets, ingredients, animal protein, and customers across the food system, making it a core food-infrastructure intermediary rather than a simple consumer brand. That places Cargill in the middle of Market Conduct: the product has real value but still uses meaningful lock-in, gatekeeping, market power, or dependency. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Linked evidence context Cargill connects farmers, food workers, commodity markets, ingredients, animal protein, and customers across the food system, making it a core food-infrastructure intermediary rather than a simple consumer brand. [3] context Cargill is a very large privately held agribusiness company, so public accountability and stakeholder control are structurally weaker than in cooperatives or public-interest food institutions. [1] context Cargill’s private-company status and upstream commodity role make consumer accountability unusually difficult because the company’s food-system power is mostly hidden behind other brands. [4]
Product Integrity ? Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.	3 / 5	Cargill connects farmers, food workers, commodity markets, ingredients, animal protein, and customers across the food system, making it a core food-infrastructure intermediary rather than a simple consumer brand. Cargill connects farmers, food workers, commodity markets, ingredients, animal protein, and customers across the food system, making it a core food-infrastructure intermediary rather than a simple consumer brand. That places Cargill in the middle of Product Integrity: the product has real use value but is compromised by incentives, monetization, lock-in, quality degradation, or risk. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Linked evidence Cargill connects farmers, food workers, commodity markets, ingredients, animal protein, and customers across the food system, making it a core food-infrastructure intermediary rather than a simple consumer brand. [3] context Cargill supplies animal protein, refined oils, cocoa, sweeteners, and processed-food ingredients, so Toxic Products exposure is material even though the company often sits upstream from consumer brands. [5]
Scale Integrity ? Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.	3 / 5	Cargill is a very large privately held agribusiness company, so public accountability and stakeholder control are structurally weaker than in cooperatives or public-interest food institutions. Cargill is a very large privately held agribusiness company, so public accountability and stakeholder control are structurally weaker than in cooperatives or public-interest food institutions. That places Cargill in the middle of Scale Integrity: scale brings useful reach but also weakens accountability, transparency, or local constraint. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Linked evidence context Cargill is a very large privately held agribusiness company, so public accountability and stakeholder control are structurally weaker than in cooperatives or public-interest food institutions. [1] context Cargill connects farmers, food workers, commodity markets, ingredients, animal protein, and customers across the food system, making it a core food-infrastructure intermediary rather than a simple consumer brand. [3] context Cargill’s commodity agriculture footprint spans crop, animal protein, and cocoa supply chains where deforestation, land-use, and emissions risks are structurally material. [6]

Penalties

Penalty	Applied	Why this penalty
Reversibility ? Applied when positive conduct depends on current living leaders, founders, family owners, or other person-contingent governance rather than durable structure. Range: -5 to 0.	-5	Cargill’s positive commitments are not locked by public or democratic governance; the private ownership model makes any stated improvements person- and family-contingent. Cargill’s positive commitments are not locked by public or democratic governance; the private ownership model makes any stated improvements person- and family-contingent. That warrants a severe Reversibility penalty because favorable conduct depends on current people or discretionary leadership rather than locked stakeholder structure. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Linked evidence Cargill’s positive commitments are not locked by public or democratic governance; the private ownership model makes any stated improvements person- and family-contingent. [7]
Human Harm ? Severity, scale, culpability, vulnerable targets, willful reoffense, reputation laundering, pattern escalation, and time decay. Range: -20 to 0.	-8	AP reported litigation and advocacy efforts over child-labor cocoa imports involving companies including Cargill, with allegations that cocoa harvested by children can enter major chocolate supply chains. AP reported litigation and advocacy efforts over child-labor cocoa imports involving companies including Cargill, with allegations that cocoa harvested by children can enter major chocolate supply chains. That warrants a substantial Human Harm penalty because ordinary operation, documented misconduct, or institutional power creates serious injury, deprivation, abuse, or foreseeable human damage. The value is substantial but not at the floor because the linked record shows serious conduct without the strongest aggravating factors on this axis. Linked evidence AP reported litigation and advocacy efforts over child-labor cocoa imports involving companies including Cargill, with allegations that cocoa harvested by children can enter major chocolate supply chains. [2]
Ecological Harm ? Footprint, trajectory, irreversibility, culpability, and scale, including whether ecological harm is central to the model and continued after credible notice. Range: -30 to 0.	-12	Cargill keeps a severe Ecological Harm penalty because commodity agriculture, animal protein, cocoa, land-use, and deforestation risks are structurally material to its business. Linked evidence Cargill’s commodity agriculture footprint spans crop, animal protein, and cocoa supply chains where deforestation, land-use, and emissions risks are structurally material. [6]
Policy Capture ? Private-interest attempts to bend law, regulation, subsidies, taxes, enforcement, trade, labor, safety, competition, environmental, healthcare, housing, surveillance, civil-liberties, or consumer policy against workers, customers, citizens, affected communities, or ecological life. Public-interest advocacy is not penalized merely because it is lobbying. Range: -15 to 0.	-6	OpenLobby records CARGILL, INCORPORATED lobbying on food, agriculture, tax, environment, transportation with about $1.4M in spending across 26 filings; the reviewed filings document private… OpenLobby records CARGILL, INCORPORATED lobbying on food, agriculture, tax, environment, transportation with about $1.4M in spending across 26 filings; the reviewed filings document private institutional lobbying over public rules rather than a public-interest advocacy role. That warrants a substantial Policy Capture penalty because private institutional pressure is being applied to public rules while affected people cannot democratically govern that agenda. The value is substantial but not at the floor because the linked record shows serious conduct without the strongest aggravating factors on this axis. Linked evidence OpenLobby records CARGILL, INCORPORATED lobbying on food, agriculture, tax, environment, transportation with about $1.4M in spending across 26 filings; the reviewed filings document private institutional lobbying over public rules rather than a public-interest advocacy role. [9]
Toxic Products ? Current sale of products whose ordinary use, exposure, ingredients, residues, packaging, or formulation creates toxic, addictive, or consumer-safety risk. Food products receive at least light scrutiny for artificial colors, artificial flavors, petro-derived additives, pesticide residues, contaminants, endocrine-disrupting packaging, and ultra-processed formulation. Ordinary adult nightlife or alcohol service is not penalized by itself without evidence of predatory marketing, youth targeting, addiction-extractive design, or unusual product-safety misconduct. Range: -5 to 0.	-3	Cargill supplies animal protein, refined oils, cocoa, sweeteners, and processed-food ingredients, so Toxic Products exposure is material even though the company often sits upstream from consumer brands. Cargill supplies animal protein, refined oils, cocoa, sweeteners, and processed-food ingredients, so Toxic Products exposure is material even though the company often sits upstream from consumer brands. That warrants a substantial Toxic Products penalty because ordinary use, exposure, ingredients, residues, packaging, or formulation creates material toxic, addictive, or consumer-safety risk. The value is substantial but not at the floor because the linked record shows serious conduct without the strongest aggravating factors on this axis. Linked evidence Cargill supplies animal protein, refined oils, cocoa, sweeteners, and processed-food ingredients, so Toxic Products exposure is material even though the company often sits upstream from consumer brands. [5]
Accountability Opacity ? Material opacity, reputation laundering, or hidden accountability structures that prevent public accountability. Range: -2 to 0.	-2	Cargill’s private-company status and upstream commodity role make consumer accountability unusually difficult because the company’s food-system power is mostly hidden behind other brands. Cargill’s private-company status and upstream commodity role make consumer accountability unusually difficult because the company’s food-system power is mostly hidden behind other brands. That warrants a severe Accountability Opacity penalty because material facts, risks, conflicts, ownership, or accountability information are obscured from the public. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Linked evidence Cargill’s private-company status and upstream commodity role make consumer accountability unusually difficult because the company’s food-system power is mostly hidden behind other brands. [4]
Ideological Disavowal ? Concealed ideology presented as neutrality, expertise, professional necessity, public-service administration, market inevitability, or non-ideological common sense while exercising power. Range: -3 to 0.	-1	Cargill presents itself as pragmatic food-system infrastructure while its commodity power embeds contested choices about land, labor, animal agriculture, and market concentration. Cargill presents itself as pragmatic food-system infrastructure while its commodity power embeds contested choices about land, labor, animal agriculture, and market concentration. That warrants a limited Ideological Disavowal penalty because the institution presents situated, contested choices as neutrality, expertise, inevitability, safety, or common sense. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Linked evidence Cargill presents itself as pragmatic food-system infrastructure while its commodity power embeds contested choices about land, labor, animal agriculture, and market concentration. [8]

Bonus Credits

No bonus credits applied in this version.

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

Medium 73/100

9 verified linked claims 9 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 9/16 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 14/20

9 verified linked claims

Source quality 15/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 9/18

9 direct claims across 16 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 6/10

9/16 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending

VerificationUnverified

ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)

ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)

Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.

Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

1Cargill is a very large privately held agribusiness company, so public accountability and stakeholder control are structurally weaker than in cooperatives or public-interest food institutions.

Ownership Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 10, 2026

AI scaffold

Cargill annual reportPrimary institutional record · 90%

2AP reported litigation and advocacy efforts over child-labor cocoa imports involving companies including Cargill, with allegations that cocoa harvested by children can enter major chocolate supply chains.

Human Harm Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 10, 2026

AI scaffold

AP: advocates sue over cocoa harvested by childrenIndependent reporting · 82%

3Cargill connects farmers, food workers, commodity markets, ingredients, animal protein, and customers across the food system, making it a core food-infrastructure intermediary rather than a simple consumer brand.

Product Integrity Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 10, 2026

AI scaffold

Cargill annual reportPrimary institutional record · 90%

4Cargill’s private-company status and upstream commodity role make consumer accountability unusually difficult because the company’s food-system power is mostly hidden behind other brands.

Accountability Opacity Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 10, 2026

AI scaffold

Cargill annual reportPrimary institutional record · 90%

5Cargill supplies animal protein, refined oils, cocoa, sweeteners, and processed-food ingredients, so Toxic Products exposure is material even though the company often sits upstream from consumer brands.

Toxic Products Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 10, 2026

AI scaffold

Cargill annual reportPrimary institutional record · 90%

6Cargill’s commodity agriculture footprint spans crop, animal protein, and cocoa supply chains where deforestation, land-use, and emissions risks are structurally material.

Ecological Harm Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 10, 2026

AI scaffold

Cargill annual reportPrimary institutional record · 90%

7Cargill’s positive commitments are not locked by public or democratic governance; the private ownership model makes any stated improvements person- and family-contingent.

Reversibility Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 10, 2026

AI scaffold

Cargill annual reportPrimary institutional record · 90%

8Cargill presents itself as pragmatic food-system infrastructure while its commodity power embeds contested choices about land, labor, animal agriculture, and market concentration.

Ideological Disavowal Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 10, 2026

AI scaffold

Cargill annual reportPrimary institutional record · 90%

9OpenLobby records CARGILL, INCORPORATED lobbying on food, agriculture, tax, environment, transportation with about $1.4M in spending across 26 filings; the reviewed filings document private institutional lobbying over public rules rather than a public-interest advocacy role.

Policy Capture Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

OpenLobby — CARGILL, INCORPORATED lobbying profileGeneral web source · 58%

Alternatives

Competitors

AGOOD61 Three Stone Hearth worker-owned community-supported kitchen · same market AGOOD60 Cheese Board Collective worker cooperative · same market AGOOD60 ChiFresh Kitchen worker-owned prepared-meal cooperative · same market AGOOD59 Alvarado Street Bakery worker-owned bakery · same market AGOOD59 Arizmendi Bakery worker cooperative bakery · same market AGOOD59 Rainbow Grocery Cooperative worker cooperative grocer · same market AGOOD58 Equal Exchange worker cooperative · same market AGOOD58 Niles Pie Company worker-owned pie shop and bakery · same market

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for Cargill Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.

View Full Audit Log