public packaged-food company

Conagra Brands

Industry Food

A public packaged-food company selling frozen meals, snacks, cooking products, meat snacks, and shelf-stable foods through brands including Healthy Choice, Banquet, Slim Jim, and Duncan Hines. Conagra Brands remains weak because of toxic or materially harmful products, youth capture, and ecological harm, even where it still has some practical value.

Why this matters: Conagra is a weak food producer because its portfolio is heavily packaged and processed, with health concerns built into ordinary products rather than isolated failures.

Letter grade F Malignant Medium confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1 Last reviewed May 10, 2026

Final Score -2* F - Malignant

FMALIGNANT-2 pts

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material19

Bonus+0

Cap35Ownership <= 2 and Governance <= 2

After Cap19

Penalties-21

Private Government badge

Conagra Brands receives the Private Government badge because it combines large-scale private rule-setting over customers, workers, users, members, or counterparties with OpenLobby-documented lobbying of about $2.8M on public policy issues.

Evidence: [10]

!Not Verified

Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Evaluation Overview

F - Malignant

The score turns mainly on Extraction, with the largest penalty coming from Policy Capture.

Strengths

Extraction4/10
Market Conduct3/5
Scale Integrity3/5

Penalties

Policy Capture-7
Toxic Products-4
Youth Capture-3
Ecological Harm-2

Evidence state

ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Linked claims10
Direct axis claims9
Coverage9/16

Scoring Axes

Axis	Score	Why this score
Ownership ? Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.	1 / 10	Conagra Brands is a public shareholder-governed packaged-food company. Linked evidence Conagra Brands is a public shareholder-governed packaged-food company. [1]
Governance ? Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.	1 / 10	Conagra Brands is a public shareholder-governed packaged-food company. Linked evidence context Conagra Brands is a public shareholder-governed packaged-food company. [1]
Extraction ? Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.	4 / 10	Conagra Brands is a public shareholder-governed packaged-food company. Conagra Brands is a public shareholder-governed packaged-food company. That places Conagra Brands in the middle of Extraction: the institution creates real value but still leaves room for rent extraction, unequal bargaining, or surplus capture. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Linked evidence context Conagra Brands is a public shareholder-governed packaged-food company. [1] context Conagra sells frozen meals, snacks, meat snacks, desserts, and packaged cooking products through major consumer brands. [2]
Labor Sovereignty ? Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.	2 / 7	Conagra Brands is a public shareholder-governed packaged-food company. Linked evidence context Conagra Brands is a public shareholder-governed packaged-food company. [1] context Conagra sells frozen meals, snacks, meat snacks, desserts, and packaged cooking products through major consumer brands. [2]
Solidarity with the Unemployed ? Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.	1 / 7	Conagra Brands is a public shareholder-governed packaged-food company. Linked evidence context Conagra Brands is a public shareholder-governed packaged-food company. [1] context Conagra sells frozen meals, snacks, meat snacks, desserts, and packaged cooking products through major consumer brands. [2]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity ? Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.	2 / 7	Conagra Brands is a public shareholder-governed packaged-food company. Linked evidence context Conagra Brands is a public shareholder-governed packaged-food company. [1] context Conagra sells frozen meals, snacks, meat snacks, desserts, and packaged cooking products through major consumer brands. [2]
Market Conduct ? Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.	3 / 5	Conagra sells frozen meals, snacks, meat snacks, desserts, and packaged cooking products through major consumer brands. Conagra sells frozen meals, snacks, meat snacks, desserts, and packaged cooking products through major consumer brands. That places Conagra Brands in the middle of Market Conduct: the product has real value but still uses meaningful lock-in, gatekeeping, market power, or dependency. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Linked evidence context Conagra sells frozen meals, snacks, meat snacks, desserts, and packaged cooking products through major consumer brands. [2] context Conagra Brands is a public shareholder-governed packaged-food company. [1] context The brand portfolio’s convenience and comfort-food presentation does not make the processed-food health burden transparent to consumers. [3]
Product Integrity ? Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.	2 / 5	Conagra sells frozen meals, snacks, meat snacks, desserts, and packaged cooking products through major consumer brands. Conagra sells frozen meals, snacks, meat snacks, desserts, and packaged cooking products through major consumer brands. That places Conagra Brands in the middle of Product Integrity: the product has real use value but is compromised by incentives, monetization, lock-in, quality degradation, or risk. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Linked evidence Conagra sells frozen meals, snacks, meat snacks, desserts, and packaged cooking products through major consumer brands. [2] context Conagra was named in ultra-processed-food litigation, and its ordinary product mix includes frozen meals, meat snacks, desserts, and processed packaged foods. [4]
Scale Integrity ? Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.	3 / 5	Conagra Brands is a public shareholder-governed packaged-food company. Conagra Brands is a public shareholder-governed packaged-food company. That places Conagra Brands in the middle of Scale Integrity: scale brings useful reach but also weakens accountability, transparency, or local constraint. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Linked evidence context Conagra Brands is a public shareholder-governed packaged-food company. [1] context Conagra sells frozen meals, snacks, meat snacks, desserts, and packaged cooking products through major consumer brands. [2] context Conagra’s packaged-food model depends on commodity agriculture, animal products, frozen-food energy use, and packaging, describes conduct considered under Ecological Harm. [5]

Penalties

Penalty	Applied	Why this penalty
Ecological Harm ? Footprint, trajectory, irreversibility, culpability, and scale, including whether ecological harm is central to the model and continued after credible notice. Range: -30 to 0.	-2	Conagra’s packaged-food model depends on commodity agriculture, animal products, frozen-food energy use, and packaging, describes conduct considered under Ecological Harm. Conagra’s packaged-food model depends on commodity agriculture, animal products, frozen-food energy use, and packaging, describes conduct considered under Ecological Harm. That warrants a limited Ecological Harm penalty because the institution causes or defends ecological damage that is more than incidental to the model. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Linked evidence Conagra’s packaged-food model depends on commodity agriculture, animal products, frozen-food energy use, and packaging, describes conduct considered under Ecological Harm. [5]
Policy Capture ? Private-interest attempts to bend law, regulation, subsidies, taxes, enforcement, trade, labor, safety, competition, environmental, healthcare, housing, surveillance, civil-liberties, or consumer policy against workers, customers, citizens, affected communities, or ecological life. Public-interest advocacy is not penalized merely because it is lobbying. Range: -15 to 0.	-7	OpenLobby records CONAGRA BRANDS INC lobbying on trade, budget, food, agriculture, energy, tax with about $2.8M in spending across 32 filings; the reviewed filings document private… OpenLobby records CONAGRA BRANDS INC lobbying on trade, budget, food, agriculture, energy, tax with about $2.8M in spending across 32 filings; the reviewed filings document private institutional lobbying over public rules rather than a public-interest advocacy role. That warrants a substantial Policy Capture penalty because private institutional pressure is being applied to public rules while affected people cannot democratically govern that agenda. The value is substantial but not at the floor because the linked record shows serious conduct without the strongest aggravating factors on this axis. Linked evidence OpenLobby records CONAGRA BRANDS INC lobbying on trade, budget, food, agriculture, energy, tax with about $2.8M in spending across 32 filings; the reviewed filings document private institutional lobbying over public rules rather than a public-interest advocacy role. [8]
High-Carbon Products ? Core products, services, financing, or supply chains that materially depend on fossil-fuel combustion, high-emissions transport, industrial animal agriculture, meat, dairy, or other unusually carbon-intensive activity. This is scored separately from general ecological harm so ordinary consumers can see carbon-intensive product exposure directly. Range: -10 to 0.	-2	The company sells mixed grocery, restaurant, or packaged-food products where meat, dairy, refrigerated logistics, or high-carbon ingredients are material but not necessarily the entire business model. Linked evidence Conagra Brands has mixed food exposure high-carbon product exposure based on its listed business model and current profile description: A public packaged-food company selling frozen meals, snacks, cooking products, meat snacks, and shelf-stable foods through brands including Healthy Choice, Banquet, Slim Jim, and Duncan Hines. Conagra Brands remains wea… [9]
Toxic Products ? Current sale of products whose ordinary use, exposure, ingredients, residues, packaging, or formulation creates toxic, addictive, or consumer-safety risk. Food products receive at least light scrutiny for artificial colors, artificial flavors, petro-derived additives, pesticide residues, contaminants, endocrine-disrupting packaging, and ultra-processed formulation. Ordinary adult nightlife or alcohol service is not penalized by itself without evidence of predatory marketing, youth targeting, addiction-extractive design, or unusual product-safety misconduct. Range: -5 to 0.	-4	Conagra was named in ultra-processed-food litigation, and its ordinary product mix includes frozen meals, meat snacks, desserts, and processed packaged foods. Conagra was named in ultra-processed-food litigation, and its ordinary product mix includes frozen meals, meat snacks, desserts, and processed packaged foods. That warrants a severe Toxic Products penalty because ordinary use, exposure, ingredients, residues, packaging, or formulation creates material toxic, addictive, or consumer-safety risk. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Linked evidence Conagra was named in ultra-processed-food litigation, and its ordinary product mix includes frozen meals, meat snacks, desserts, and processed packaged foods. [4]
Youth Capture ? Manipulative youth-directed marketing, youth-data or attention monetization, collectible/add-on traps, parasocial or identity capture, surprise mechanics, or treating young people as lower-disclosure consumers. Making useful toys or welcoming children is not itself penalized. Range: -5 to 0.	-3	Conagra’s snack and packaged-dessert brands include products marketed in family and youth-adjacent contexts, describes conduct considered under Youth Capture below the most child-focused cereal and lunch-kit companies. Conagra’s snack and packaged-dessert brands include products marketed in family and youth-adjacent contexts, describes conduct considered under Youth Capture below the most child-focused cereal and lunch-kit companies. That warrants a substantial Youth Capture penalty because young people are treated as manipulable consumers, data sources, attention targets, or culture markets. The value is substantial but not at the floor because the linked record shows serious conduct without the strongest aggravating factors on this axis. Linked evidence Conagra’s snack and packaged-dessert brands include products marketed in family and youth-adjacent contexts, describes conduct considered under Youth Capture below the most child-focused cereal and lunch-kit companies. [6]
Accountability Opacity ? Material opacity, reputation laundering, or hidden accountability structures that prevent public accountability. Range: -2 to 0.	-2	The brand portfolio’s convenience and comfort-food presentation does not make the processed-food health burden transparent to consumers. The brand portfolio’s convenience and comfort-food presentation does not make the processed-food health burden transparent to consumers. That warrants a severe Accountability Opacity penalty because material facts, risks, conflicts, ownership, or accountability information are obscured from the public. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Linked evidence The brand portfolio’s convenience and comfort-food presentation does not make the processed-food health burden transparent to consumers. [3]
Ideological Disavowal ? Concealed ideology presented as neutrality, expertise, professional necessity, public-service administration, market inevitability, or non-ideological common sense while exercising power. Range: -3 to 0.	-1	Conagra frames processed convenience as ordinary food choice while the portfolio embeds health, packaging, and commodity-agriculture externalities. Conagra frames processed convenience as ordinary food choice while the portfolio embeds health, packaging, and commodity-agriculture externalities. That warrants a limited Ideological Disavowal penalty because the institution presents situated, contested choices as neutrality, expertise, inevitability, safety, or common sense. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Linked evidence Conagra frames processed convenience as ordinary food choice while the portfolio embeds health, packaging, and commodity-agriculture externalities. [7]

Bonus Credits

No bonus credits applied in this version.

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

Medium 71/100

9 verified linked claims 9 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 9/16 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 16/20

9 verified linked claims

Source quality 12/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 9/18

9 direct claims across 16 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 6/10

9/16 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending

VerificationUnverified

ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)

ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)

Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.

Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

1Conagra Brands is a public shareholder-governed packaged-food company.

Ownership Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 10, 2026

AI scaffold

Conagra investor relationsOfficial self-description · 68%

2Conagra sells frozen meals, snacks, meat snacks, desserts, and packaged cooking products through major consumer brands.

Product Integrity Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 10, 2026

AI scaffold

Conagra brandsGeneral web source · 58%

3The brand portfolio’s convenience and comfort-food presentation does not make the processed-food health burden transparent to consumers.

Accountability Opacity Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 10, 2026

AI scaffold

AP: San Francisco sues top food manufacturers over ultraprocessed foodsIndependent reporting · 82%

4Conagra was named in ultra-processed-food litigation, and its ordinary product mix includes frozen meals, meat snacks, desserts, and processed packaged foods.

Toxic Products Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 10, 2026

AI scaffold

AP: San Francisco sues top food manufacturers over ultraprocessed foodsIndependent reporting · 82%
Conagra brandsGeneral web source · 58%

5Conagra’s packaged-food model depends on commodity agriculture, animal products, frozen-food energy use, and packaging, describes conduct considered under Ecological Harm.

Ecological Harm Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 10, 2026

AI scaffold

Conagra brandsGeneral web source · 58%

6Conagra’s snack and packaged-dessert brands include products marketed in family and youth-adjacent contexts, describes conduct considered under Youth Capture below the most child-focused cereal and lunch-kit companies.

Youth Capture Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 10, 2026

AI scaffold

Conagra brandsGeneral web source · 58%

7Conagra frames processed convenience as ordinary food choice while the portfolio embeds health, packaging, and commodity-agriculture externalities.

Ideological Disavowal Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 10, 2026

AI scaffold

Conagra brandsGeneral web source · 58%

8OpenLobby records CONAGRA BRANDS INC lobbying on trade, budget, food, agriculture, energy, tax with about $2.8M in spending across 32 filings; the reviewed filings document private institutional lobbying over public rules rather than a public-interest advocacy role.

Policy Capture Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

OpenLobby — CONAGRA BRANDS INC lobbying profileGeneral web source · 58%

9Conagra Brands has mixed food exposure high-carbon product exposure based on its listed business model and current profile description: A public packaged-food company selling frozen meals, snacks, cooking products, meat snacks, and shelf-stable foods through brands including Healthy Choice, Banquet, Slim Jim, and Duncan Hines. Conagra Brands remains wea…

High Carbon Products Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 11, 2026

Conagra Brands public siteGeneral web source · 58%
Our World in Data: Environmental Impacts of Food ProductionGeneral web source · 58%

10Conagra Brands receives the Private Government badge because it combines large-scale private rule-setting over customers, workers, users, members, or counterparties with OpenLobby-documented lobbying of about $2.8M on public policy issues.

Private Government Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

OpenLobby — CONAGRA BRANDS INC lobbying profileGeneral web source · 58%

Alternatives

Competitors

AGOOD61 Three Stone Hearth worker-owned community-supported kitchen · same market AGOOD60 Cheese Board Collective worker cooperative · same market AGOOD60 ChiFresh Kitchen worker-owned prepared-meal cooperative · same market AGOOD59 Alvarado Street Bakery worker-owned bakery · same market AGOOD59 Arizmendi Bakery worker cooperative bakery · same market AGOOD59 Rainbow Grocery Cooperative worker cooperative grocer · same market AGOOD58 Equal Exchange worker cooperative · same market AGOOD58 Niles Pie Company worker-owned pie shop and bakery · same market

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for Conagra Brands Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.

View Full Audit Log