plant-based frozen meal and smoothie delivery company

Daily Harvest

Industry Food

A plant-based frozen food delivery company selling smoothies, bowls, soups, flatbreads, snacks, and other prepared foods. Daily Harvest earns product-direction credit for plant-based convenience, but the 2022 lentil-crumble illness recall sharply limits product-integrity trust and keeps the score below better plant-forward peers.

Why this matters: Daily Harvest shows why plant-based branding still needs hard food-safety accountability.

Letter grade D Extractive High confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1 Last reviewed May 13, 2026

Final Score 23* D - Extractive

DEXTRACTIVE23 pts

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material33

Bonus+3

Cap41Ownership <= 4 and Governance <= 4

After Cap36

Penalties-13

Vegan badge

The public materials reviewed for this pass present Daily Harvest as vegan or plant-based enough for the vegan badge. The badge is informational; carbon, toxicity, labor, price, and governance are scored separately.

Evidence: [18]

!Not Verified

Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Evaluation Overview

D - Extractive

The score turns mainly on Extraction, with the largest penalty coming from Human Harm.

Strengths

Extraction6/10
Solidarity with the Unemployed5/7
Market Conduct4/5

Penalties

Human Harm-4
Toxic Products-3
Subscription Capture-2
Accountability Opacity-2

Evidence state

ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Linked claims17
Direct axis claims17
Coverage17/17

Scoring Axes

Axis	Score	Why this score
Ownership ? Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.	3 / 10	Daily Harvest's public record identifies its ownership, parent relationship, or institutional form in the meal-kit, prepared-meal, or food-delivery market. Daily Harvest's public record identifies its ownership, parent relationship, or institutional form in the meal-kit, prepared-meal, or food-delivery market. On Ownership, Daily Harvest belongs low because ordinary food usefulness is being delivered through shareholder, parent-company, founder, or platform control. The meal service can still help customers eat, but the institutional power mostly remains private and one-sided. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Meal-delivery expansion calibrated across worker-owned community kitchens, local farmer-supported prepared meals, plant-forward subscriptions, organic meal kits, parent-owned meal-kit brands, and food-platform consolidators. Linked evidence Daily Harvest's public record identifies its ownership, parent relationship, or institutional form in the meal-kit, prepared-meal, or food-delivery market. [1] context Daily Harvest's public materials show whether control is held by workers, a cooperative kitchen, founders, a private platform, a public company, or a parent food group. [2] context Daily Harvest's model determines whether meal value is routed through cooperative kitchens, local farmers, public-benefit food work, private subscriptions, or platform scale. [3] context Daily Harvest's reviewed public record shows the degree to which cooks, delivery workers, farmers, chefs, or ordinary employees have binding power rather than vendor or employment dependence. [4] context Daily Harvest's service affects access to prepared food, home cooking, disability-friendly meal support, local farmer demand, chef income, or lower-friction meal planning. [5] context Daily Harvest's public model affects whether spoilage, missed delivery, food-safety, cancellation, packaging, and meal-selection risks are absorbed by the institution or shifted to customers and workers. [6] context Daily Harvest operates in a market where customers often face recurring orders, changing menus, plan deadlines, delivery windows, shipping fees, and freshness uncertainty. [7] context Daily Harvest's core product integrity depends on ingredient quality, prepared-food safety, nutritional quality, packaging, accurate menus, and whether convenience improves or degrades ordinary meals. [8] context Daily Harvest's scale, distribution network, platform role, or local-kitchen model affects whether growth strengthens food access or turns meals into a consolidated private subscription system. [9]
Governance ? Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.	3 / 10	Daily Harvest's linked public materials show whether control is held by workers, a cooperative kitchen, founders, a private platform, a public company, or a parent food group. Daily Harvest's linked public materials show whether control is held by workers, a cooperative kitchen, founders, a private platform, a public company, or a parent food group. On Governance, Daily Harvest belongs low because ordinary food usefulness is being delivered through shareholder, parent-company, founder, or platform control. The meal service can still help customers eat, but the institutional power mostly remains private and one-sided. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Meal-delivery expansion calibrated across worker-owned community kitchens, local farmer-supported prepared meals, plant-forward subscriptions, organic meal kits, parent-owned meal-kit brands, and food-platform consolidators. Linked evidence context Daily Harvest's public record identifies its ownership, parent relationship, or institutional form in the meal-kit, prepared-meal, or food-delivery market. [1] Daily Harvest's public materials show whether control is held by workers, a cooperative kitchen, founders, a private platform, a public company, or a parent food group. [2] context Daily Harvest's model determines whether meal value is routed through cooperative kitchens, local farmers, public-benefit food work, private subscriptions, or platform scale. [3] context Daily Harvest's reviewed public record shows the degree to which cooks, delivery workers, farmers, chefs, or ordinary employees have binding power rather than vendor or employment dependence. [4] context Daily Harvest's service affects access to prepared food, home cooking, disability-friendly meal support, local farmer demand, chef income, or lower-friction meal planning. [5] context Daily Harvest's public model affects whether spoilage, missed delivery, food-safety, cancellation, packaging, and meal-selection risks are absorbed by the institution or shifted to customers and workers. [6] context Daily Harvest operates in a market where customers often face recurring orders, changing menus, plan deadlines, delivery windows, shipping fees, and freshness uncertainty. [7] context Daily Harvest's core product integrity depends on ingredient quality, prepared-food safety, nutritional quality, packaging, accurate menus, and whether convenience improves or degrades ordinary meals. [8] context Daily Harvest's scale, distribution network, platform role, or local-kitchen model affects whether growth strengthens food access or turns meals into a consolidated private subscription system. [9]
Extraction ? Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.	6 / 10	Daily Harvest's model determines whether meal value is routed through cooperative kitchens, local farmers, public-benefit food work, private subscriptions, or platform scale. Daily Harvest's model determines whether meal value is routed through cooperative kitchens, local farmers, public-benefit food work, private subscriptions, or platform scale. On Extraction, Daily Harvest sits in the positive middle: the service provides real meal-planning or prepared-food utility and shows some mission, sourcing, product, or local-chef strength. It remains below the cooperative kitchens because customers and workers still do not hold binding control over the institution. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Meal-delivery expansion calibrated across worker-owned community kitchens, local farmer-supported prepared meals, plant-forward subscriptions, organic meal kits, parent-owned meal-kit brands, and food-platform consolidators. Linked evidence context Daily Harvest's public record identifies its ownership, parent relationship, or institutional form in the meal-kit, prepared-meal, or food-delivery market. [1] context Daily Harvest's public materials show whether control is held by workers, a cooperative kitchen, founders, a private platform, a public company, or a parent food group. [2] Daily Harvest's model determines whether meal value is routed through cooperative kitchens, local farmers, public-benefit food work, private subscriptions, or platform scale. [3] context Daily Harvest's reviewed public record shows the degree to which cooks, delivery workers, farmers, chefs, or ordinary employees have binding power rather than vendor or employment dependence. [4] context Daily Harvest's service affects access to prepared food, home cooking, disability-friendly meal support, local farmer demand, chef income, or lower-friction meal planning. [5] context Daily Harvest's public model affects whether spoilage, missed delivery, food-safety, cancellation, packaging, and meal-selection risks are absorbed by the institution or shifted to customers and workers. [6] context Daily Harvest operates in a market where customers often face recurring orders, changing menus, plan deadlines, delivery windows, shipping fees, and freshness uncertainty. [7] context Daily Harvest's core product integrity depends on ingredient quality, prepared-food safety, nutritional quality, packaging, accurate menus, and whether convenience improves or degrades ordinary meals. [8] context Daily Harvest's scale, distribution network, platform role, or local-kitchen model affects whether growth strengthens food access or turns meals into a consolidated private subscription system. [9]
Labor Sovereignty ? Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.	3 / 7	Daily Harvest's reviewed public record shows the degree to which cooks, delivery workers, farmers, chefs, or ordinary employees have binding power rather than vendor or employment dependence. Daily Harvest's reviewed public record shows the degree to which cooks, delivery workers, farmers, chefs, or ordinary employees have binding power rather than vendor or employment dependence. On Labor Sovereignty, Daily Harvest belongs low because ordinary food usefulness is being delivered through shareholder, parent-company, founder, or platform control. The meal service can still help customers eat, but the institutional power mostly remains private and one-sided. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Meal-delivery expansion calibrated across worker-owned community kitchens, local farmer-supported prepared meals, plant-forward subscriptions, organic meal kits, parent-owned meal-kit brands, and food-platform consolidators. Linked evidence context Daily Harvest's public record identifies its ownership, parent relationship, or institutional form in the meal-kit, prepared-meal, or food-delivery market. [1] context Daily Harvest's public materials show whether control is held by workers, a cooperative kitchen, founders, a private platform, a public company, or a parent food group. [2] context Daily Harvest's model determines whether meal value is routed through cooperative kitchens, local farmers, public-benefit food work, private subscriptions, or platform scale. [3] Daily Harvest's reviewed public record shows the degree to which cooks, delivery workers, farmers, chefs, or ordinary employees have binding power rather than vendor or employment dependence. [4] context Daily Harvest's service affects access to prepared food, home cooking, disability-friendly meal support, local farmer demand, chef income, or lower-friction meal planning. [5] context Daily Harvest's public model affects whether spoilage, missed delivery, food-safety, cancellation, packaging, and meal-selection risks are absorbed by the institution or shifted to customers and workers. [6] context Daily Harvest operates in a market where customers often face recurring orders, changing menus, plan deadlines, delivery windows, shipping fees, and freshness uncertainty. [7] context Daily Harvest's core product integrity depends on ingredient quality, prepared-food safety, nutritional quality, packaging, accurate menus, and whether convenience improves or degrades ordinary meals. [8] context Daily Harvest's scale, distribution network, platform role, or local-kitchen model affects whether growth strengthens food access or turns meals into a consolidated private subscription system. [9]
Solidarity with the Unemployed ? Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.	5 / 7	Daily Harvest's service affects access to prepared food, home cooking, disability-friendly meal support, local farmer demand, chef income, or lower-friction meal planning. Daily Harvest's service affects access to prepared food, home cooking, disability-friendly meal support, local farmer demand, chef income, or lower-friction meal planning. On Solidarity with the Unemployed, Daily Harvest sits in the positive middle: the service provides real meal-planning or prepared-food utility and shows some mission, sourcing, product, or local-chef strength. It remains below the cooperative kitchens because customers and workers still do not hold binding control over the institution. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Meal-delivery expansion calibrated across worker-owned community kitchens, local farmer-supported prepared meals, plant-forward subscriptions, organic meal kits, parent-owned meal-kit brands, and food-platform consolidators. Linked evidence context Daily Harvest's public record identifies its ownership, parent relationship, or institutional form in the meal-kit, prepared-meal, or food-delivery market. [1] context Daily Harvest's public materials show whether control is held by workers, a cooperative kitchen, founders, a private platform, a public company, or a parent food group. [2] context Daily Harvest's model determines whether meal value is routed through cooperative kitchens, local farmers, public-benefit food work, private subscriptions, or platform scale. [3] context Daily Harvest's reviewed public record shows the degree to which cooks, delivery workers, farmers, chefs, or ordinary employees have binding power rather than vendor or employment dependence. [4] Daily Harvest's service affects access to prepared food, home cooking, disability-friendly meal support, local farmer demand, chef income, or lower-friction meal planning. [5] context Daily Harvest's public model affects whether spoilage, missed delivery, food-safety, cancellation, packaging, and meal-selection risks are absorbed by the institution or shifted to customers and workers. [6] context Daily Harvest operates in a market where customers often face recurring orders, changing menus, plan deadlines, delivery windows, shipping fees, and freshness uncertainty. [7] context Daily Harvest's core product integrity depends on ingredient quality, prepared-food safety, nutritional quality, packaging, accurate menus, and whether convenience improves or degrades ordinary meals. [8] context Daily Harvest's scale, distribution network, platform role, or local-kitchen model affects whether growth strengthens food access or turns meals into a consolidated private subscription system. [9]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity ? Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.	3 / 7	Daily Harvest's public model affects whether spoilage, missed delivery, food-safety, cancellation, packaging, and meal-selection risks are absorbed by the institution or shifted to customers and workers. Daily Harvest's public model affects whether spoilage, missed delivery, food-safety, cancellation, packaging, and meal-selection risks are absorbed by the institution or shifted to customers and workers. On Loss-Bearing Fidelity, Daily Harvest belongs low because ordinary food usefulness is being delivered through shareholder, parent-company, founder, or platform control. The meal service can still help customers eat, but the institutional power mostly remains private and one-sided. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Meal-delivery expansion calibrated across worker-owned community kitchens, local farmer-supported prepared meals, plant-forward subscriptions, organic meal kits, parent-owned meal-kit brands, and food-platform consolidators. Linked evidence context Daily Harvest's public record identifies its ownership, parent relationship, or institutional form in the meal-kit, prepared-meal, or food-delivery market. [1] context Daily Harvest's public materials show whether control is held by workers, a cooperative kitchen, founders, a private platform, a public company, or a parent food group. [2] context Daily Harvest's model determines whether meal value is routed through cooperative kitchens, local farmers, public-benefit food work, private subscriptions, or platform scale. [3] context Daily Harvest's reviewed public record shows the degree to which cooks, delivery workers, farmers, chefs, or ordinary employees have binding power rather than vendor or employment dependence. [4] context Daily Harvest's service affects access to prepared food, home cooking, disability-friendly meal support, local farmer demand, chef income, or lower-friction meal planning. [5] Daily Harvest's public model affects whether spoilage, missed delivery, food-safety, cancellation, packaging, and meal-selection risks are absorbed by the institution or shifted to customers and workers. [6] context Daily Harvest operates in a market where customers often face recurring orders, changing menus, plan deadlines, delivery windows, shipping fees, and freshness uncertainty. [7] context Daily Harvest's core product integrity depends on ingredient quality, prepared-food safety, nutritional quality, packaging, accurate menus, and whether convenience improves or degrades ordinary meals. [8] context Daily Harvest's scale, distribution network, platform role, or local-kitchen model affects whether growth strengthens food access or turns meals into a consolidated private subscription system. [9]
Market Conduct ? Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.	4 / 5	Daily Harvest operates in a market where customers often face recurring orders, changing menus, plan deadlines, delivery windows, shipping fees, and freshness uncertainty. Daily Harvest operates in a market where customers often face recurring orders, changing menus, plan deadlines, delivery windows, shipping fees, and freshness uncertainty. On Market Conduct, Daily Harvest sits in the positive middle: the service provides real meal-planning or prepared-food utility and shows some mission, sourcing, product, or local-chef strength. It remains below the cooperative kitchens because customers and workers still do not hold binding control over the institution. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Meal-delivery expansion calibrated across worker-owned community kitchens, local farmer-supported prepared meals, plant-forward subscriptions, organic meal kits, parent-owned meal-kit brands, and food-platform consolidators. Linked evidence context Daily Harvest's public record identifies its ownership, parent relationship, or institutional form in the meal-kit, prepared-meal, or food-delivery market. [1] context Daily Harvest's public materials show whether control is held by workers, a cooperative kitchen, founders, a private platform, a public company, or a parent food group. [2] context Daily Harvest's model determines whether meal value is routed through cooperative kitchens, local farmers, public-benefit food work, private subscriptions, or platform scale. [3] context Daily Harvest's reviewed public record shows the degree to which cooks, delivery workers, farmers, chefs, or ordinary employees have binding power rather than vendor or employment dependence. [4] context Daily Harvest's service affects access to prepared food, home cooking, disability-friendly meal support, local farmer demand, chef income, or lower-friction meal planning. [5] context Daily Harvest's public model affects whether spoilage, missed delivery, food-safety, cancellation, packaging, and meal-selection risks are absorbed by the institution or shifted to customers and workers. [6] Daily Harvest operates in a market where customers often face recurring orders, changing menus, plan deadlines, delivery windows, shipping fees, and freshness uncertainty. [7] context Daily Harvest's core product integrity depends on ingredient quality, prepared-food safety, nutritional quality, packaging, accurate menus, and whether convenience improves or degrades ordinary meals. [8] context Daily Harvest's scale, distribution network, platform role, or local-kitchen model affects whether growth strengthens food access or turns meals into a consolidated private subscription system. [9]
Product Integrity ? Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.	2 / 5	Daily Harvest's core product integrity depends on ingredient quality, prepared-food safety, nutritional quality, packaging, accurate menus, and whether convenience improves or degrades ordinary meals. Daily Harvest's core product integrity depends on ingredient quality, prepared-food safety, nutritional quality, packaging, accurate menus, and whether convenience improves or degrades ordinary meals. On Product Integrity, Daily Harvest belongs low because ordinary food usefulness is being delivered through shareholder, parent-company, founder, or platform control. The meal service can still help customers eat, but the institutional power mostly remains private and one-sided. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Meal-delivery expansion calibrated across worker-owned community kitchens, local farmer-supported prepared meals, plant-forward subscriptions, organic meal kits, parent-owned meal-kit brands, and food-platform consolidators. Linked evidence context Daily Harvest's public record identifies its ownership, parent relationship, or institutional form in the meal-kit, prepared-meal, or food-delivery market. [1] context Daily Harvest's public materials show whether control is held by workers, a cooperative kitchen, founders, a private platform, a public company, or a parent food group. [2] context Daily Harvest's model determines whether meal value is routed through cooperative kitchens, local farmers, public-benefit food work, private subscriptions, or platform scale. [3] context Daily Harvest's reviewed public record shows the degree to which cooks, delivery workers, farmers, chefs, or ordinary employees have binding power rather than vendor or employment dependence. [4] context Daily Harvest's service affects access to prepared food, home cooking, disability-friendly meal support, local farmer demand, chef income, or lower-friction meal planning. [5] context Daily Harvest's public model affects whether spoilage, missed delivery, food-safety, cancellation, packaging, and meal-selection risks are absorbed by the institution or shifted to customers and workers. [6] context Daily Harvest operates in a market where customers often face recurring orders, changing menus, plan deadlines, delivery windows, shipping fees, and freshness uncertainty. [7] Daily Harvest's core product integrity depends on ingredient quality, prepared-food safety, nutritional quality, packaging, accurate menus, and whether convenience improves or degrades ordinary meals. [8] context Daily Harvest's scale, distribution network, platform role, or local-kitchen model affects whether growth strengthens food access or turns meals into a consolidated private subscription system. [9]
Scale Integrity ? Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.	4 / 5	Daily Harvest's scale, distribution network, platform role, or local-kitchen model affects whether growth strengthens food access or turns meals into a consolidated private subscription system. Daily Harvest's scale, distribution network, platform role, or local-kitchen model affects whether growth strengthens food access or turns meals into a consolidated private subscription system. On Scale Integrity, Daily Harvest sits in the positive middle: the service provides real meal-planning or prepared-food utility and shows some mission, sourcing, product, or local-chef strength. It remains below the cooperative kitchens because customers and workers still do not hold binding control over the institution. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Meal-delivery expansion calibrated across worker-owned community kitchens, local farmer-supported prepared meals, plant-forward subscriptions, organic meal kits, parent-owned meal-kit brands, and food-platform consolidators. Linked evidence context Daily Harvest's public record identifies its ownership, parent relationship, or institutional form in the meal-kit, prepared-meal, or food-delivery market. [1] context Daily Harvest's public materials show whether control is held by workers, a cooperative kitchen, founders, a private platform, a public company, or a parent food group. [2] context Daily Harvest's model determines whether meal value is routed through cooperative kitchens, local farmers, public-benefit food work, private subscriptions, or platform scale. [3] context Daily Harvest's reviewed public record shows the degree to which cooks, delivery workers, farmers, chefs, or ordinary employees have binding power rather than vendor or employment dependence. [4] context Daily Harvest's service affects access to prepared food, home cooking, disability-friendly meal support, local farmer demand, chef income, or lower-friction meal planning. [5] context Daily Harvest's public model affects whether spoilage, missed delivery, food-safety, cancellation, packaging, and meal-selection risks are absorbed by the institution or shifted to customers and workers. [6] context Daily Harvest operates in a market where customers often face recurring orders, changing menus, plan deadlines, delivery windows, shipping fees, and freshness uncertainty. [7] context Daily Harvest's core product integrity depends on ingredient quality, prepared-food safety, nutritional quality, packaging, accurate menus, and whether convenience improves or degrades ordinary meals. [8] Daily Harvest's scale, distribution network, platform role, or local-kitchen model affects whether growth strengthens food access or turns meals into a consolidated private subscription system. [9]

Penalties

Penalty	Applied	Why this penalty
Human Harm ? Severity, scale, culpability, vulnerable targets, willful reoffense, reputation laundering, pattern escalation, and time decay. Range: -20 to 0.	-4	Daily Harvest's public record makes Human Harm relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits. Daily Harvest's public record makes Human Harm relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits. This creates a Human Harm penalty because the risk comes from how the service sells, ships, sources, personalizes, renews, packages, or governs food. The value is limited where the evidence shows ordinary category exposure rather than severe or unavoidable harm. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Meal-delivery expansion calibrated across worker-owned community kitchens, local farmer-supported prepared meals, plant-forward subscriptions, organic meal kits, parent-owned meal-kit brands, and food-platform consolidators. Linked evidence Daily Harvest's public record makes Human Harm relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits. [12]
Toxic Products ? Current sale of products whose ordinary use, exposure, ingredients, residues, packaging, or formulation creates toxic, addictive, or consumer-safety risk. Food products receive at least light scrutiny for artificial colors, artificial flavors, petro-derived additives, pesticide residues, contaminants, endocrine-disrupting packaging, and ultra-processed formulation. Ordinary adult nightlife or alcohol service is not penalized by itself without evidence of predatory marketing, youth targeting, addiction-extractive design, or unusual product-safety misconduct. Range: -5 to 0.	-3	Daily Harvest's public record makes Toxic Products relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits. Daily Harvest's public record makes Toxic Products relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits. This creates a Toxic Products penalty because the risk comes from how the service sells, ships, sources, personalizes, renews, packages, or governs food. The value is limited where the evidence shows ordinary category exposure rather than severe or unavoidable harm. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Meal-delivery expansion calibrated across worker-owned community kitchens, local farmer-supported prepared meals, plant-forward subscriptions, organic meal kits, parent-owned meal-kit brands, and food-platform consolidators. Linked evidence Daily Harvest's public record makes Toxic Products relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits. [13]
Subscription Capture ? Manipulative recurring-payment, automatic-renewal, cancellation-friction, bundling, trial-conversion, or refund designs that profit from inertia or confusion. Range: -5 to 0.	-2	Daily Harvest's public record makes Subscription Capture relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits. Daily Harvest's public record makes Subscription Capture relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits. This creates a Subscription Capture penalty because the risk comes from how the service sells, ships, sources, personalizes, renews, packages, or governs food. The value is limited where the evidence shows ordinary category exposure rather than severe or unavoidable harm. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Meal-delivery expansion calibrated across worker-owned community kitchens, local farmer-supported prepared meals, plant-forward subscriptions, organic meal kits, parent-owned meal-kit brands, and food-platform consolidators. Linked evidence Daily Harvest's public record makes Subscription Capture relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits. [14]
Unilateral Terms ? Non-negotiable clickthrough or adhesion terms that turn ordinary customer, user, subscriber, patient, tenant, or public-facing access into a one-sided contract, especially forced arbitration, class-action or mass-action waivers, unilateral modification, venue restrictions, broad indemnity, account termination discretion, or essential-service access conditioned on unreadable terms. Range: -5 to 0.	-1	Daily Harvest's public record makes Unilateral Terms relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits. Daily Harvest's public record makes Unilateral Terms relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits. This creates a Unilateral Terms penalty because the risk comes from how the service sells, ships, sources, personalizes, renews, packages, or governs food. The value is limited where the evidence shows ordinary category exposure rather than severe or unavoidable harm. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Meal-delivery expansion calibrated across worker-owned community kitchens, local farmer-supported prepared meals, plant-forward subscriptions, organic meal kits, parent-owned meal-kit brands, and food-platform consolidators. Linked evidence Daily Harvest's public record makes Unilateral Terms relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits. [15]
Accountability Opacity ? Material opacity, reputation laundering, or hidden accountability structures that prevent public accountability. Range: -2 to 0.	-2	Daily Harvest's public record makes Accountability Opacity relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits. Daily Harvest's public record makes Accountability Opacity relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits. This creates a Accountability Opacity penalty because the risk comes from how the service sells, ships, sources, personalizes, renews, packages, or governs food. The value is limited where the evidence shows ordinary category exposure rather than severe or unavoidable harm. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Meal-delivery expansion calibrated across worker-owned community kitchens, local farmer-supported prepared meals, plant-forward subscriptions, organic meal kits, parent-owned meal-kit brands, and food-platform consolidators. Linked evidence Daily Harvest's public record makes Accountability Opacity relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits. [16]
Identity Capture ? Customer pressure, employee pressure, and pervasive identity saturation. Range: -3 to 0.	-1	Daily Harvest's public record makes Identity Capture relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits. Daily Harvest's public record makes Identity Capture relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits. This creates a Identity Capture penalty because the risk comes from how the service sells, ships, sources, personalizes, renews, packages, or governs food. The value is limited where the evidence shows ordinary category exposure rather than severe or unavoidable harm. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Meal-delivery expansion calibrated across worker-owned community kitchens, local farmer-supported prepared meals, plant-forward subscriptions, organic meal kits, parent-owned meal-kit brands, and food-platform consolidators. Linked evidence Daily Harvest's public record makes Identity Capture relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits. [17]

Bonus Credits

Bonus	Credit	Why this credit
Good Deal ? Credit for unusually fair value: durable quality, fair pricing, low lock-in, and clear customer surplus.	2 / 3	Daily Harvest's public record makes Good Deal relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits. Daily Harvest's public record makes Good Deal relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits. This adds Good Deal credit because the practice creates unusual food access, transparent value, local-farmer support, chef autonomy, plant-forward substitution, or lower-waste meal planning. The credit is capped where the service is still a private subscription or narrow local option. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Meal-delivery expansion calibrated across worker-owned community kitchens, local farmer-supported prepared meals, plant-forward subscriptions, organic meal kits, parent-owned meal-kit brands, and food-platform consolidators. Linked evidence Daily Harvest's public record makes Good Deal relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits. [10]
Cost Transparency ? Credit for clear posted prices, all-in fees, unit costs, public rate cards, margin/cost visibility, or surplus-allocation transparency, especially in markets where opaque quotes, hidden fees, or individualized pricing are normal.	1 / 3	Daily Harvest's public record makes Cost Transparency relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits. Daily Harvest's public record makes Cost Transparency relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits. This adds Cost Transparency credit because the practice creates unusual food access, transparent value, local-farmer support, chef autonomy, plant-forward substitution, or lower-waste meal planning. The credit is capped where the service is still a private subscription or narrow local option. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Meal-delivery expansion calibrated across worker-owned community kitchens, local farmer-supported prepared meals, plant-forward subscriptions, organic meal kits, parent-owned meal-kit brands, and food-platform consolidators. Linked evidence Daily Harvest's public record makes Cost Transparency relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits. [11]

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

High 85/100

17 verified linked claims 17 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 17/17 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 16/20

17 verified linked claims

Source quality 16/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 14/18

17 direct claims across 17 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 10/10

17/17 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending

VerificationUnverified

ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)

ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)

Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.

Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

1Daily Harvest's public record identifies its ownership, parent relationship, or institutional form in the meal-kit, prepared-meal, or food-delivery market.

Ownership Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Daily Harvest official siteGeneral web source · 58%

2Daily Harvest's public materials show whether control is held by workers, a cooperative kitchen, founders, a private platform, a public company, or a parent food group.

Governance Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Daily Harvest official siteGeneral web source · 58%

3Daily Harvest's model determines whether meal value is routed through cooperative kitchens, local farmers, public-benefit food work, private subscriptions, or platform scale.

Extraction Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Daily Harvest official siteGeneral web source · 58%

4Daily Harvest's reviewed public record shows the degree to which cooks, delivery workers, farmers, chefs, or ordinary employees have binding power rather than vendor or employment dependence.

Labor Sovereignty Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

FDA Daily Harvest recallPrimary public record · 100%

5Daily Harvest's service affects access to prepared food, home cooking, disability-friendly meal support, local farmer demand, chef income, or lower-friction meal planning.

Solidarity Unemployed Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

FDA Daily Harvest recallPrimary public record · 100%

6Daily Harvest's public model affects whether spoilage, missed delivery, food-safety, cancellation, packaging, and meal-selection risks are absorbed by the institution or shifted to customers and workers.

Loss Bearing Fidelity Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

FDA Daily Harvest recallPrimary public record · 100%

7Daily Harvest operates in a market where customers often face recurring orders, changing menus, plan deadlines, delivery windows, shipping fees, and freshness uncertainty.

Market Conduct Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

FDA Daily Harvest recallPrimary public record · 100%

8Daily Harvest's core product integrity depends on ingredient quality, prepared-food safety, nutritional quality, packaging, accurate menus, and whether convenience improves or degrades ordinary meals.

Product Integrity Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Daily Harvest official siteGeneral web source · 58%

9Daily Harvest's scale, distribution network, platform role, or local-kitchen model affects whether growth strengthens food access or turns meals into a consolidated private subscription system.

Scale Integrity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

FDA Daily Harvest recallPrimary public record · 100%

10Daily Harvest's public record makes Good Deal relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits.

Good Deal Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

FDA Daily Harvest recallPrimary public record · 100%

11Daily Harvest's public record makes Cost Transparency relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits.

Cost Transparency Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

FDA Daily Harvest recallPrimary public record · 100%

12Daily Harvest's public record makes Human Harm relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits.

Human Harm Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

FDA Daily Harvest recallPrimary public record · 100%

13Daily Harvest's public record makes Toxic Products relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits.

Toxic Products Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

FDA Daily Harvest recallPrimary public record · 100%

14Daily Harvest's public record makes Subscription Capture relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits.

Subscription Capture Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

FDA Daily Harvest recallPrimary public record · 100%

15Daily Harvest's public record makes Unilateral Terms relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits.

Unilateral Terms Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

FDA Daily Harvest recallPrimary public record · 100%

16Daily Harvest's public record makes Accountability Opacity relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits.

Accountability Opacity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

FDA Daily Harvest recallPrimary public record · 100%

17Daily Harvest's public record makes Identity Capture relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits.

Identity Capture Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

FDA Daily Harvest recallPrimary public record · 100%

18Daily Harvest's reviewed public materials present the service as vegan or plant-based in its ordinary public offering.

Dietary Status Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Daily Harvest official siteGeneral web source · 58%

Alternatives

Competitors

AGOOD61 Three Stone Hearth worker-owned community-supported kitchen · same market AGOOD60 Cheese Board Collective worker cooperative · same market AGOOD60 ChiFresh Kitchen worker-owned prepared-meal cooperative · same market AGOOD59 Alvarado Street Bakery worker-owned bakery · same market AGOOD59 Arizmendi Bakery worker cooperative bakery · same market AGOOD59 Rainbow Grocery Cooperative worker cooperative grocer · same market AGOOD58 Equal Exchange worker cooperative · same market AGOOD58 Niles Pie Company worker-owned pie shop and bakery · same market

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for Daily Harvest Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.

View Full Audit Log