public fresh produce company

Dole plc

Industry Food

A public fresh produce company selling bananas, pineapples, fresh vegetables, salads, berries, and other fruit and vegetable products worldwide. Dole scores in the lower middle because whole produce has real product value, but public ownership, plantation-scale agriculture, pesticide exposure, transport emissions, and supplier-labor opacity prevent a positive rating.

Why this matters: Dole belongs in the directory because fruit is an ordinary staple category where shoppers need better and worse options.

Letter grade D Extractive High confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1 Last reviewed May 12, 2026

Final Score 13* D - Extractive

DEXTRACTIVE13 pts

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material26

Bonus+0

Cap35Ownership <= 2 and Governance <= 2

After Cap26

Penalties-13

!Not Verified

Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Evaluation Overview

D - Extractive

The score turns mainly on Product Integrity, with the largest penalty coming from Ecological Harm.

Strengths

Product Integrity5/5
Scale Integrity5/5
Extraction3/10

Penalties

Ecological Harm-4
Toxic Products-3
Policy Capture-2
Accountability Opacity-2

Evidence state

ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Linked claims15
Direct axis claims15
Coverage15/15

Scoring Axes

Axis	Score	Why this score
Ownership ? Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.	1 / 10	Dole plc's public record identifies its ownership form, parent-company control, public listing, private control, or grower-owned structure. Dole plc's public record identifies its ownership form, parent-company control, public listing, private control, or grower-owned structure. On Ownership, Dole plc belongs low because decision power rests with public shareholders, private owners, parent companies, or executives while workers, consumers, and farm communities mostly remain rule-takers. Any credit reflects useful food or product quality rather than democratic institutional power. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Candy and produce expansion calibrated across Berkshire-owned candy, public candy giants, premium chocolate brands, mission chocolate, public produce firms, and grower-owned produce alternatives. Linked evidence Dole plc's public record identifies its ownership form, parent-company control, public listing, private control, or grower-owned structure. [1] context Dole plc's public materials do not show binding democratic control by ordinary workers, consumers, farm laborers, or affected communities except where grower ownership is expressly identified. [2] context Dole plc's business model sells branded candy, chocolate, fruit, produce, or prepared produce through company-controlled supply chains and retail or wholesale channels. [3] context Dole plc's public record gives limited evidence of ordinary worker power over pricing, sourcing, product rules, or strategic control; producer-owner evidence is counted separately where present. [4] context Dole plc's products are grocery or food items, but access and benefit depend mainly on ordinary purchasing power rather than need-based, public, or worker-controlled allocation. [5] context Dole plc's public record shows whether quality, sourcing, certifications, producer ownership, or sustainability programs shift burdens away from consumers, farmworkers, growers, and affected communities. [6] context Dole plc's public materials show how the company uses brands, certifications, supply-chain claims, retail channels, or mission claims to compete in food markets. [7] context Dole plc's core products are evaluated as food products: whole fruit and produce get more integrity credit than sugar-heavy candy, while chocolate quality does not erase nutritional and supply-chain harms. [8] context Dole plc's scale and distribution determine whether the company is a grocery staple, a premium confectioner, a global supply-chain actor, or a grower-owned alternative. [9]
Governance ? Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.	1 / 10	Dole plc's linked public materials do not show binding democratic control by ordinary workers, consumers, farm laborers, or affected communities except where grower ownership is expressly identified. Dole plc's linked public materials do not show binding democratic control by ordinary workers, consumers, farm laborers, or affected communities except where grower ownership is expressly identified. On Governance, Dole plc belongs low because decision power rests with public shareholders, private owners, parent companies, or executives while workers, consumers, and farm communities mostly remain rule-takers. Any credit reflects useful food or product quality rather than democratic institutional power. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Candy and produce expansion calibrated across Berkshire-owned candy, public candy giants, premium chocolate brands, mission chocolate, public produce firms, and grower-owned produce alternatives. Linked evidence context Dole plc's public record identifies its ownership form, parent-company control, public listing, private control, or grower-owned structure. [1] Dole plc's public materials do not show binding democratic control by ordinary workers, consumers, farm laborers, or affected communities except where grower ownership is expressly identified. [2] context Dole plc's business model sells branded candy, chocolate, fruit, produce, or prepared produce through company-controlled supply chains and retail or wholesale channels. [3] context Dole plc's public record gives limited evidence of ordinary worker power over pricing, sourcing, product rules, or strategic control; producer-owner evidence is counted separately where present. [4] context Dole plc's products are grocery or food items, but access and benefit depend mainly on ordinary purchasing power rather than need-based, public, or worker-controlled allocation. [5] context Dole plc's public record shows whether quality, sourcing, certifications, producer ownership, or sustainability programs shift burdens away from consumers, farmworkers, growers, and affected communities. [6] context Dole plc's public materials show how the company uses brands, certifications, supply-chain claims, retail channels, or mission claims to compete in food markets. [7] context Dole plc's core products are evaluated as food products: whole fruit and produce get more integrity credit than sugar-heavy candy, while chocolate quality does not erase nutritional and supply-chain harms. [8] context Dole plc's scale and distribution determine whether the company is a grocery staple, a premium confectioner, a global supply-chain actor, or a grower-owned alternative. [9]
Extraction ? Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.	3 / 10	Dole plc's business model sells branded candy, chocolate, fruit, produce, or prepared produce through company-controlled supply chains and retail or wholesale channels. Dole plc's business model sells branded candy, chocolate, fruit, produce, or prepared produce through company-controlled supply chains and retail or wholesale channels. On Extraction, Dole plc belongs low because decision power rests with public shareholders, private owners, parent companies, or executives while workers, consumers, and farm communities mostly remain rule-takers. Any credit reflects useful food or product quality rather than democratic institutional power. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Candy and produce expansion calibrated across Berkshire-owned candy, public candy giants, premium chocolate brands, mission chocolate, public produce firms, and grower-owned produce alternatives. Linked evidence context Dole plc's public record identifies its ownership form, parent-company control, public listing, private control, or grower-owned structure. [1] context Dole plc's public materials do not show binding democratic control by ordinary workers, consumers, farm laborers, or affected communities except where grower ownership is expressly identified. [2] Dole plc's business model sells branded candy, chocolate, fruit, produce, or prepared produce through company-controlled supply chains and retail or wholesale channels. [3] context Dole plc's public record gives limited evidence of ordinary worker power over pricing, sourcing, product rules, or strategic control; producer-owner evidence is counted separately where present. [4] context Dole plc's products are grocery or food items, but access and benefit depend mainly on ordinary purchasing power rather than need-based, public, or worker-controlled allocation. [5] context Dole plc's public record shows whether quality, sourcing, certifications, producer ownership, or sustainability programs shift burdens away from consumers, farmworkers, growers, and affected communities. [6] context Dole plc's public materials show how the company uses brands, certifications, supply-chain claims, retail channels, or mission claims to compete in food markets. [7] context Dole plc's core products are evaluated as food products: whole fruit and produce get more integrity credit than sugar-heavy candy, while chocolate quality does not erase nutritional and supply-chain harms. [8] context Dole plc's scale and distribution determine whether the company is a grocery staple, a premium confectioner, a global supply-chain actor, or a grower-owned alternative. [9]
Labor Sovereignty ? Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.	2 / 7	Dole plc's public record gives limited evidence of ordinary worker power over pricing, sourcing, product rules, or strategic control; producer-owner evidence is counted separately where present. Dole plc's public record gives limited evidence of ordinary worker power over pricing, sourcing, product rules, or strategic control; producer-owner evidence is counted separately where present. On Labor Sovereignty, Dole plc belongs low because decision power rests with public shareholders, private owners, parent companies, or executives while workers, consumers, and farm communities mostly remain rule-takers. Any credit reflects useful food or product quality rather than democratic institutional power. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Candy and produce expansion calibrated across Berkshire-owned candy, public candy giants, premium chocolate brands, mission chocolate, public produce firms, and grower-owned produce alternatives. Linked evidence context Dole plc's public record identifies its ownership form, parent-company control, public listing, private control, or grower-owned structure. [1] context Dole plc's public materials do not show binding democratic control by ordinary workers, consumers, farm laborers, or affected communities except where grower ownership is expressly identified. [2] context Dole plc's business model sells branded candy, chocolate, fruit, produce, or prepared produce through company-controlled supply chains and retail or wholesale channels. [3] Dole plc's public record gives limited evidence of ordinary worker power over pricing, sourcing, product rules, or strategic control; producer-owner evidence is counted separately where present. [4] context Dole plc's products are grocery or food items, but access and benefit depend mainly on ordinary purchasing power rather than need-based, public, or worker-controlled allocation. [5] context Dole plc's public record shows whether quality, sourcing, certifications, producer ownership, or sustainability programs shift burdens away from consumers, farmworkers, growers, and affected communities. [6] context Dole plc's public materials show how the company uses brands, certifications, supply-chain claims, retail channels, or mission claims to compete in food markets. [7] context Dole plc's core products are evaluated as food products: whole fruit and produce get more integrity credit than sugar-heavy candy, while chocolate quality does not erase nutritional and supply-chain harms. [8] context Dole plc's scale and distribution determine whether the company is a grocery staple, a premium confectioner, a global supply-chain actor, or a grower-owned alternative. [9]
Solidarity with the Unemployed ? Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.	3 / 7	Dole plc's products are grocery or food items, but access and benefit depend mainly on ordinary purchasing power rather than need-based, public, or worker-controlled allocation. Dole plc's products are grocery or food items, but access and benefit depend mainly on ordinary purchasing power rather than need-based, public, or worker-controlled allocation. On Solidarity with the Unemployed, Dole plc belongs low because decision power rests with public shareholders, private owners, parent companies, or executives while workers, consumers, and farm communities mostly remain rule-takers. Any credit reflects useful food or product quality rather than democratic institutional power. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Candy and produce expansion calibrated across Berkshire-owned candy, public candy giants, premium chocolate brands, mission chocolate, public produce firms, and grower-owned produce alternatives. Linked evidence context Dole plc's public record identifies its ownership form, parent-company control, public listing, private control, or grower-owned structure. [1] context Dole plc's public materials do not show binding democratic control by ordinary workers, consumers, farm laborers, or affected communities except where grower ownership is expressly identified. [2] context Dole plc's business model sells branded candy, chocolate, fruit, produce, or prepared produce through company-controlled supply chains and retail or wholesale channels. [3] context Dole plc's public record gives limited evidence of ordinary worker power over pricing, sourcing, product rules, or strategic control; producer-owner evidence is counted separately where present. [4] Dole plc's products are grocery or food items, but access and benefit depend mainly on ordinary purchasing power rather than need-based, public, or worker-controlled allocation. [5] context Dole plc's public record shows whether quality, sourcing, certifications, producer ownership, or sustainability programs shift burdens away from consumers, farmworkers, growers, and affected communities. [6] context Dole plc's public materials show how the company uses brands, certifications, supply-chain claims, retail channels, or mission claims to compete in food markets. [7] context Dole plc's core products are evaluated as food products: whole fruit and produce get more integrity credit than sugar-heavy candy, while chocolate quality does not erase nutritional and supply-chain harms. [8] context Dole plc's scale and distribution determine whether the company is a grocery staple, a premium confectioner, a global supply-chain actor, or a grower-owned alternative. [9]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity ? Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.	3 / 7	Dole plc's public record gives limited direct evidence about whether quality, sourcing, certifications, producer ownership, or sustainability programs shift burdens away from consumers, farmworkers, growers, and affected communities. Dole plc's public record gives limited direct evidence about whether quality, sourcing, certifications, producer ownership, or sustainability programs shift burdens away from consumers, farmworkers, growers, and affected communities. On Loss-Bearing Fidelity, Dole plc belongs low because decision power rests with public shareholders, private owners, parent companies, or executives while workers, consumers, and farm communities mostly remain rule-takers. Any credit reflects useful food or product quality rather than democratic institutional power. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Candy and produce expansion calibrated across Berkshire-owned candy, public candy giants, premium chocolate brands, mission chocolate, public produce firms, and grower-owned produce alternatives. Linked evidence context Dole plc's public record identifies its ownership form, parent-company control, public listing, private control, or grower-owned structure. [1] context Dole plc's public materials do not show binding democratic control by ordinary workers, consumers, farm laborers, or affected communities except where grower ownership is expressly identified. [2] context Dole plc's business model sells branded candy, chocolate, fruit, produce, or prepared produce through company-controlled supply chains and retail or wholesale channels. [3] context Dole plc's public record gives limited evidence of ordinary worker power over pricing, sourcing, product rules, or strategic control; producer-owner evidence is counted separately where present. [4] context Dole plc's products are grocery or food items, but access and benefit depend mainly on ordinary purchasing power rather than need-based, public, or worker-controlled allocation. [5] Dole plc's public record shows whether quality, sourcing, certifications, producer ownership, or sustainability programs shift burdens away from consumers, farmworkers, growers, and affected communities. [6] context Dole plc's public materials show how the company uses brands, certifications, supply-chain claims, retail channels, or mission claims to compete in food markets. [7] context Dole plc's core products are evaluated as food products: whole fruit and produce get more integrity credit than sugar-heavy candy, while chocolate quality does not erase nutritional and supply-chain harms. [8] context Dole plc's scale and distribution determine whether the company is a grocery staple, a premium confectioner, a global supply-chain actor, or a grower-owned alternative. [9]
Market Conduct ? Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.	3 / 5	Dole plc's linked public materials show how the company uses brands, certifications, supply-chain claims, retail channels, or mission claims to compete in food markets. Dole plc's linked public materials show how the company uses brands, certifications, supply-chain claims, retail channels, or mission claims to compete in food markets. On Market Conduct, Dole plc belongs low because decision power rests with public shareholders, private owners, parent companies, or executives while workers, consumers, and farm communities mostly remain rule-takers. Any credit reflects useful food or product quality rather than democratic institutional power. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Candy and produce expansion calibrated across Berkshire-owned candy, public candy giants, premium chocolate brands, mission chocolate, public produce firms, and grower-owned produce alternatives. Linked evidence context Dole plc's public record identifies its ownership form, parent-company control, public listing, private control, or grower-owned structure. [1] context Dole plc's public materials do not show binding democratic control by ordinary workers, consumers, farm laborers, or affected communities except where grower ownership is expressly identified. [2] context Dole plc's business model sells branded candy, chocolate, fruit, produce, or prepared produce through company-controlled supply chains and retail or wholesale channels. [3] context Dole plc's public record gives limited evidence of ordinary worker power over pricing, sourcing, product rules, or strategic control; producer-owner evidence is counted separately where present. [4] context Dole plc's products are grocery or food items, but access and benefit depend mainly on ordinary purchasing power rather than need-based, public, or worker-controlled allocation. [5] context Dole plc's public record shows whether quality, sourcing, certifications, producer ownership, or sustainability programs shift burdens away from consumers, farmworkers, growers, and affected communities. [6] Dole plc's public materials show how the company uses brands, certifications, supply-chain claims, retail channels, or mission claims to compete in food markets. [7] context Dole plc's core products are evaluated as food products: whole fruit and produce get more integrity credit than sugar-heavy candy, while chocolate quality does not erase nutritional and supply-chain harms. [8] context Dole plc's scale and distribution determine whether the company is a grocery staple, a premium confectioner, a global supply-chain actor, or a grower-owned alternative. [9]
Product Integrity ? Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.	5 / 5	Dole plc's core products are evaluated as food products: whole fruit and produce get more integrity credit than sugar-heavy candy, while chocolate quality does not erase nutritional and supply-chain harms. Dole plc's core products are evaluated as food products: whole fruit and produce get more integrity credit than sugar-heavy candy, while chocolate quality does not erase nutritional and supply-chain harms. On Product Integrity, Dole plc sits in the middle: the food has real use, quality, sourcing, or mission value, but private or public owner control still limits accountability. This places it above extractive candy giants and below democratic, worker-owned, or fully mission-locked food alternatives. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Candy and produce expansion calibrated across Berkshire-owned candy, public candy giants, premium chocolate brands, mission chocolate, public produce firms, and grower-owned produce alternatives. Linked evidence context Dole plc's public record identifies its ownership form, parent-company control, public listing, private control, or grower-owned structure. [1] context Dole plc's public materials do not show binding democratic control by ordinary workers, consumers, farm laborers, or affected communities except where grower ownership is expressly identified. [2] context Dole plc's business model sells branded candy, chocolate, fruit, produce, or prepared produce through company-controlled supply chains and retail or wholesale channels. [3] context Dole plc's public record gives limited evidence of ordinary worker power over pricing, sourcing, product rules, or strategic control; producer-owner evidence is counted separately where present. [4] context Dole plc's products are grocery or food items, but access and benefit depend mainly on ordinary purchasing power rather than need-based, public, or worker-controlled allocation. [5] context Dole plc's public record shows whether quality, sourcing, certifications, producer ownership, or sustainability programs shift burdens away from consumers, farmworkers, growers, and affected communities. [6] context Dole plc's public materials show how the company uses brands, certifications, supply-chain claims, retail channels, or mission claims to compete in food markets. [7] Dole plc's core products are evaluated as food products: whole fruit and produce get more integrity credit than sugar-heavy candy, while chocolate quality does not erase nutritional and supply-chain harms. [8] context Dole plc's scale and distribution determine whether the company is a grocery staple, a premium confectioner, a global supply-chain actor, or a grower-owned alternative. [9]
Scale Integrity ? Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.	5 / 5	Dole plc's scale and distribution determine whether the company is a grocery staple, a premium confectioner, a global supply-chain actor, or a grower-owned alternative. Dole plc's scale and distribution determine whether the company is a grocery staple, a premium confectioner, a global supply-chain actor, or a grower-owned alternative. On Scale Integrity, Dole plc sits in the middle: the food has real use, quality, sourcing, or mission value, but private or public owner control still limits accountability. This places it above extractive candy giants and below democratic, worker-owned, or fully mission-locked food alternatives. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Candy and produce expansion calibrated across Berkshire-owned candy, public candy giants, premium chocolate brands, mission chocolate, public produce firms, and grower-owned produce alternatives. Linked evidence context Dole plc's public record identifies its ownership form, parent-company control, public listing, private control, or grower-owned structure. [1] context Dole plc's public materials do not show binding democratic control by ordinary workers, consumers, farm laborers, or affected communities except where grower ownership is expressly identified. [2] context Dole plc's business model sells branded candy, chocolate, fruit, produce, or prepared produce through company-controlled supply chains and retail or wholesale channels. [3] context Dole plc's public record gives limited evidence of ordinary worker power over pricing, sourcing, product rules, or strategic control; producer-owner evidence is counted separately where present. [4] context Dole plc's products are grocery or food items, but access and benefit depend mainly on ordinary purchasing power rather than need-based, public, or worker-controlled allocation. [5] context Dole plc's public record shows whether quality, sourcing, certifications, producer ownership, or sustainability programs shift burdens away from consumers, farmworkers, growers, and affected communities. [6] context Dole plc's public materials show how the company uses brands, certifications, supply-chain claims, retail channels, or mission claims to compete in food markets. [7] context Dole plc's core products are evaluated as food products: whole fruit and produce get more integrity credit than sugar-heavy candy, while chocolate quality does not erase nutritional and supply-chain harms. [8] Dole plc's scale and distribution determine whether the company is a grocery staple, a premium confectioner, a global supply-chain actor, or a grower-owned alternative. [9]

Penalties

Penalty	Applied	Why this penalty
Ecological Harm ? Footprint, trajectory, irreversibility, culpability, and scale, including whether ecological harm is central to the model and continued after credible notice. Range: -30 to 0.	-4	Dole plc's product model depends on agricultural land use, packaging, shipping, cocoa, palm oil, dairy, plantation-scale fruit, or conventional produce practices that create ecological exposure. Dole plc's product model depends on agricultural land use, packaging, shipping, cocoa, palm oil, dairy, plantation-scale fruit, or conventional produce practices that create ecological exposure. This creates an Ecological Harm penalty because agriculture, cocoa, palm oil, dairy, packaging, shipping, or conventional produce methods externalize environmental costs. The value is calibrated below fossil-fuel producers but above clean-service businesses with little material footprint. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Candy and produce expansion calibrated across Berkshire-owned candy, public candy giants, premium chocolate brands, mission chocolate, public produce firms, and grower-owned produce alternatives. Linked evidence Dole plc's product model depends on agricultural land use, packaging, shipping, cocoa, palm oil, dairy, plantation-scale fruit, or conventional produce practices that create ecological exposure. [10]
Policy Capture ? Private-interest attempts to bend law, regulation, subsidies, taxes, enforcement, trade, labor, safety, competition, environmental, healthcare, housing, surveillance, civil-liberties, or consumer policy against workers, customers, citizens, affected communities, or ecological life. Public-interest advocacy is not penalized merely because it is lobbying. Range: -15 to 0.	-2	Dole plc's size, trade position, public-company status, or large branded food market presence makes policy and regulatory influence relevant to the evaluation. Dole plc's size, trade position, public-company status, or large branded food market presence makes policy and regulatory influence relevant to the evaluation. This creates a Policy Capture penalty because the evidence connects this food company to the specific harm measured by the axis. The value is calibrated against nearby candy, produce, and cooperative food entries rather than assumed for the whole sector. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Candy and produce expansion calibrated across Berkshire-owned candy, public candy giants, premium chocolate brands, mission chocolate, public produce firms, and grower-owned produce alternatives. Linked evidence Dole plc's size, trade position, public-company status, or large branded food market presence makes policy and regulatory influence relevant to the evaluation. [11]
High-Carbon Products ? Core products, services, financing, or supply chains that materially depend on fossil-fuel combustion, high-emissions transport, industrial animal agriculture, meat, dairy, or other unusually carbon-intensive activity. This is scored separately from general ecological harm so ordinary consumers can see carbon-intensive product exposure directly. Range: -10 to 0.	-1	Dole plc's product mix includes cocoa, dairy chocolate, global refrigerated produce, long-distance shipping, or other carbon-relevant food-system activity. Dole plc's product mix includes cocoa, dairy chocolate, global refrigerated produce, long-distance shipping, or other carbon-relevant food-system activity. This creates a High-Carbon Products penalty because chocolate, dairy inputs, refrigerated logistics, and long-distance produce distribution carry carbon exposure. The value is lighter for whole fruit than for meat, fossil fuel, or dairy-centered companies. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Candy and produce expansion calibrated across Berkshire-owned candy, public candy giants, premium chocolate brands, mission chocolate, public produce firms, and grower-owned produce alternatives. Linked evidence Dole plc's product mix includes cocoa, dairy chocolate, global refrigerated produce, long-distance shipping, or other carbon-relevant food-system activity. [12]
Toxic Products ? Current sale of products whose ordinary use, exposure, ingredients, residues, packaging, or formulation creates toxic, addictive, or consumer-safety risk. Food products receive at least light scrutiny for artificial colors, artificial flavors, petro-derived additives, pesticide residues, contaminants, endocrine-disrupting packaging, and ultra-processed formulation. Ordinary adult nightlife or alcohol service is not penalized by itself without evidence of predatory marketing, youth targeting, addiction-extractive design, or unusual product-safety misconduct. Range: -5 to 0.	-3	Dole plc's products create toxic-product scrutiny through high sugar, ultra-processed candy ingredients, pesticide-dependent conventional agriculture, or food-additive exposure. Dole plc's products create toxic-product scrutiny through high sugar, ultra-processed candy ingredients, pesticide-dependent conventional agriculture, or food-additive exposure. This creates a Toxic Products penalty because consumers should not have to treat candy sugar loads, ultra-processed confectionery, pesticide exposure, or opaque food additives as harmless by default. Whole produce belongs at a lighter penalty tier than candy because the core product is nutritionally useful. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Candy and produce expansion calibrated across Berkshire-owned candy, public candy giants, premium chocolate brands, mission chocolate, public produce firms, and grower-owned produce alternatives. Linked evidence Dole plc's products create toxic-product scrutiny through high sugar, ultra-processed candy ingredients, pesticide-dependent conventional agriculture, or food-additive exposure. [13]
Accountability Opacity ? Material opacity, reputation laundering, or hidden accountability structures that prevent public accountability. Range: -2 to 0.	-2	Dole plc's public materials do not give consumers a complete, plain account of ownership control, farm labor, ingredients, pesticides, supply-chain costs, margins, and externalized harms. Dole plc's public materials do not give consumers a complete, plain account of ownership control, farm labor, ingredients, pesticides, supply-chain costs, margins, and externalized harms. This creates a Accountability Opacity penalty because shoppers cannot easily verify enough about ownership, farms, labor, pesticides, ingredients, margins, and externalities to audit the product at point of purchase. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Candy and produce expansion calibrated across Berkshire-owned candy, public candy giants, premium chocolate brands, mission chocolate, public produce firms, and grower-owned produce alternatives. Linked evidence Dole plc's public materials do not give consumers a complete, plain account of ownership control, farm labor, ingredients, pesticides, supply-chain costs, margins, and externalized harms. [14]
Ideological Disavowal ? Concealed ideology presented as neutrality, expertise, professional necessity, public-service administration, market inevitability, or non-ideological common sense while exercising power. Range: -3 to 0.	-1	Dole plc's public framing presents candy, fruit, sustainability, craft, or ethical sourcing in ways that can soften contested supply-chain and product-health tradeoffs. Dole plc's public framing presents candy, fruit, sustainability, craft, or ethical sourcing in ways that can soften contested supply-chain and product-health tradeoffs. This creates a limited Ideological Disavowal penalty where wholesome fruit, craft chocolate, sustainability, nostalgia, or ethical-brand language can conceal harder choices about labor, health, ownership, and externalized harm. The penalty is modest unless the company claims broad moral neutrality. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Candy and produce expansion calibrated across Berkshire-owned candy, public candy giants, premium chocolate brands, mission chocolate, public produce firms, and grower-owned produce alternatives. Linked evidence Dole plc's public framing presents candy, fruit, sustainability, craft, or ethical sourcing in ways that can soften contested supply-chain and product-health tradeoffs. [15]

Bonus Credits

No bonus credits applied in this version.

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

High 81/100

15 verified linked claims 15 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 15/15 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 16/20

15 verified linked claims

Source quality 12/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 14/18

15 direct claims across 15 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 10/10

15/15 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending

VerificationUnverified

ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)

ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)

Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.

Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

1Dole plc's public record identifies its ownership form, parent-company control, public listing, private control, or grower-owned structure.

Ownership Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Dole plc investor overviewOfficial self-description · 68%

2Dole plc's public materials do not show binding democratic control by ordinary workers, consumers, farm laborers, or affected communities except where grower ownership is expressly identified.

Governance Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Dole plc investor overviewOfficial self-description · 68%

3Dole plc's business model sells branded candy, chocolate, fruit, produce, or prepared produce through company-controlled supply chains and retail or wholesale channels.

Extraction Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Dole plc investor overviewOfficial self-description · 68%

4Dole plc's public record gives limited evidence of ordinary worker power over pricing, sourcing, product rules, or strategic control; producer-owner evidence is counted separately where present.

Labor Sovereignty Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Dole plc sustainability reportsOfficial self-description · 68%

5Dole plc's products are grocery or food items, but access and benefit depend mainly on ordinary purchasing power rather than need-based, public, or worker-controlled allocation.

Solidarity Unemployed Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Dole plc investor overviewOfficial self-description · 68%

6Dole plc's public record shows whether quality, sourcing, certifications, producer ownership, or sustainability programs shift burdens away from consumers, farmworkers, growers, and affected communities.

Loss Bearing Fidelity Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Dole plc sustainability reportsOfficial self-description · 68%

7Dole plc's public materials show how the company uses brands, certifications, supply-chain claims, retail channels, or mission claims to compete in food markets.

Market Conduct Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Dole plc investor overviewOfficial self-description · 68%

8Dole plc's core products are evaluated as food products: whole fruit and produce get more integrity credit than sugar-heavy candy, while chocolate quality does not erase nutritional and supply-chain harms.

Product Integrity Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Dole plc investor overviewOfficial self-description · 68%

9Dole plc's scale and distribution determine whether the company is a grocery staple, a premium confectioner, a global supply-chain actor, or a grower-owned alternative.

Scale Integrity Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Dole plc investor overviewOfficial self-description · 68%

10Dole plc's product model depends on agricultural land use, packaging, shipping, cocoa, palm oil, dairy, plantation-scale fruit, or conventional produce practices that create ecological exposure.

Ecological Harm Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Dole plc sustainability reportsOfficial self-description · 68%

11Dole plc's size, trade position, public-company status, or large branded food market presence makes policy and regulatory influence relevant to the evaluation.

Policy Capture Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Dole plc investor overviewOfficial self-description · 68%

12Dole plc's product mix includes cocoa, dairy chocolate, global refrigerated produce, long-distance shipping, or other carbon-relevant food-system activity.

High Carbon Products Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Dole plc sustainability reportsOfficial self-description · 68%

13Dole plc's products create toxic-product scrutiny through high sugar, ultra-processed candy ingredients, pesticide-dependent conventional agriculture, or food-additive exposure.

Toxic Products Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Dole plc sustainability reportsOfficial self-description · 68%

14Dole plc's public materials do not give consumers a complete, plain account of ownership control, farm labor, ingredients, pesticides, supply-chain costs, margins, and externalized harms.

Accountability Opacity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Dole plc investor overviewOfficial self-description · 68%

15Dole plc's public framing presents candy, fruit, sustainability, craft, or ethical sourcing in ways that can soften contested supply-chain and product-health tradeoffs.

Ideological Disavowal Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Dole plc investor overviewOfficial self-description · 68%

Alternatives

Competitors

AGOOD61 Three Stone Hearth worker-owned community-supported kitchen · same market AGOOD60 Cheese Board Collective worker cooperative · same market AGOOD60 ChiFresh Kitchen worker-owned prepared-meal cooperative · same market AGOOD59 Alvarado Street Bakery worker-owned bakery · same market AGOOD59 Arizmendi Bakery worker cooperative bakery · same market AGOOD59 Rainbow Grocery Cooperative worker cooperative grocer · same market AGOOD58 Equal Exchange worker cooperative · same market AGOOD58 Niles Pie Company worker-owned pie shop and bakery · same market

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for Dole plc Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.

View Full Audit Log