environmental advocacy network

Environment America

A national network of state environmental groups working on clean air, clean water, clean energy, wildlife, public lands, and climate policy. Environment America scores in the qualified middle because the mission is useful and public-facing, but its professionalized network structure and policy-pressure model keep ordinary members, workers, and affected communities at a distance from control.

Why this matters: This entry separates legitimate environmental public value from the centralized activist infrastructure that produces it.

Letter grade D Extractive High confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1 Parent / owner: The Public Interest Network Last reviewed May 12, 2026

Environment America says it is part of The Public Interest Network.

Final Score 32* D - Extractive

DEXTRACTIVE32 pts

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material36

Bonus+5

Cap41Ownership <= 4 and Governance <= 4

After Cap41

Penalties-9

!Not Verified

Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Owned by The Public Interest Network

The parent profile is currently rated D (Extractive, 28*). This subsidiary is not mechanically capped at the parent score, but parent control is part of the ownership, governance, policy, accountability opacity, reversibility, and harm analysis.

Evaluation Overview

D - Extractive

The score turns mainly on Solidarity with the Unemployed, with the largest penalty coming from Policy Capture.

Strengths

Solidarity with the Unemployed5/7
Product Integrity5/5
Scale Integrity5/5

Penalties

Policy Capture-3
Accountability Opacity-2
Identity Capture-2
Youth Capture-1

Evidence state

ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Linked claims18
Direct axis claims18
Coverage18/18

Scoring Axes

Axis	Score	Why this score
Ownership ? Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.	4 / 10	Environment America's public record identifies it as a nonprofit, advocacy network, recruiting organization, student group, research center, or electoral advocacy organization rather than a worker-owned or user-owned cooperative. Environment America's public record identifies it as a nonprofit, advocacy network, recruiting organization, student group, research center, or electoral advocacy organization rather than a worker-owned or user-owned cooperative. On Ownership, Environment America sits in the middle: the mission can be genuinely useful, but control still runs through professional nonprofit, network, or campaign leadership. That places it above pure fundraising machinery and below organizations where workers, members, or affected communities govern the institution. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Public Interest Network and adjacent liberal activist infrastructure calibrated across network parent, canvassing arm, policy advocacy, research, student, recruiting, community-support, and electoral organizations. Linked evidence Environment America's public record identifies it as a nonprofit, advocacy network, recruiting organization, student group, research center, or electoral advocacy organization rather than a worker-owned or user-owned cooperative. [1] context Environment America's public materials do not show binding democratic control by ordinary workers, donors, canvassers, students, constituents, or affected communities. [2] context Environment America's operating model converts donations, dues, student fees, volunteer labor, campaign work, public attention, or research into advocacy capacity. [3] context Environment America's worker-power record is evaluated against public descriptions of staff roles, recruiting pipelines, canvassing work, union activity, or NLRB/labor records where available. [4] context Environment America's mission or services address public goods such as consumer protection, environmental health, democracy, education affordability, or pollution cleanup rather than ordinary private consumption. [5] context Environment America's advocacy, research, organizing, or community-support work can shift some problem-solving costs away from isolated individuals and toward organized public action. [6] context Environment America's conduct is evaluated as advocacy-market conduct: recruitment, canvassing, donor acquisition, student-fee funding, policy pressure, research publication, and public campaign framing. [7] context Environment America's core output is advocacy, research, organizing, recruiting, electoral support, or community training rather than a physical consumer product. [8] context Environment America's scale and network position determine whether its campaigns create broad public benefit, concentrated institutional control, or both. [9]
Governance ? Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.	3 / 10	Environment America's linked public materials do not show binding democratic control by ordinary workers, donors, canvassers, students, constituents, or affected communities. Environment America's linked public materials do not show binding democratic control by ordinary workers, donors, canvassers, students, constituents, or affected communities. On Governance, Environment America sits in the middle: the mission can be genuinely useful, but control still runs through professional nonprofit, network, or campaign leadership. That places it above pure fundraising machinery and below organizations where workers, members, or affected communities govern the institution. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Public Interest Network and adjacent liberal activist infrastructure calibrated across network parent, canvassing arm, policy advocacy, research, student, recruiting, community-support, and electoral organizations. Linked evidence context Environment America's public record identifies it as a nonprofit, advocacy network, recruiting organization, student group, research center, or electoral advocacy organization rather than a worker-owned or user-owned cooperative. [1] Environment America's public materials do not show binding democratic control by ordinary workers, donors, canvassers, students, constituents, or affected communities. [2] context Environment America's operating model converts donations, dues, student fees, volunteer labor, campaign work, public attention, or research into advocacy capacity. [3] context Environment America's worker-power record is evaluated against public descriptions of staff roles, recruiting pipelines, canvassing work, union activity, or NLRB/labor records where available. [4] context Environment America's mission or services address public goods such as consumer protection, environmental health, democracy, education affordability, or pollution cleanup rather than ordinary private consumption. [5] context Environment America's advocacy, research, organizing, or community-support work can shift some problem-solving costs away from isolated individuals and toward organized public action. [6] context Environment America's conduct is evaluated as advocacy-market conduct: recruitment, canvassing, donor acquisition, student-fee funding, policy pressure, research publication, and public campaign framing. [7] context Environment America's core output is advocacy, research, organizing, recruiting, electoral support, or community training rather than a physical consumer product. [8] context Environment America's scale and network position determine whether its campaigns create broad public benefit, concentrated institutional control, or both. [9]
Extraction ? Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.	4 / 10	Environment America's operating model converts donations, dues, student fees, volunteer labor, campaign work, public attention, or research into advocacy capacity. Environment America's operating model converts donations, dues, student fees, volunteer labor, campaign work, public attention, or research into advocacy capacity. On Extraction, Environment America sits in the middle: the mission can be genuinely useful, but control still runs through professional nonprofit, network, or campaign leadership. That places it above pure fundraising machinery and below organizations where workers, members, or affected communities govern the institution. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Public Interest Network and adjacent liberal activist infrastructure calibrated across network parent, canvassing arm, policy advocacy, research, student, recruiting, community-support, and electoral organizations. Linked evidence context Environment America's public record identifies it as a nonprofit, advocacy network, recruiting organization, student group, research center, or electoral advocacy organization rather than a worker-owned or user-owned cooperative. [1] context Environment America's public materials do not show binding democratic control by ordinary workers, donors, canvassers, students, constituents, or affected communities. [2] Environment America's operating model converts donations, dues, student fees, volunteer labor, campaign work, public attention, or research into advocacy capacity. [3] context Environment America's worker-power record is evaluated against public descriptions of staff roles, recruiting pipelines, canvassing work, union activity, or NLRB/labor records where available. [4] context Environment America's mission or services address public goods such as consumer protection, environmental health, democracy, education affordability, or pollution cleanup rather than ordinary private consumption. [5] context Environment America's advocacy, research, organizing, or community-support work can shift some problem-solving costs away from isolated individuals and toward organized public action. [6] context Environment America's conduct is evaluated as advocacy-market conduct: recruitment, canvassing, donor acquisition, student-fee funding, policy pressure, research publication, and public campaign framing. [7] context Environment America's core output is advocacy, research, organizing, recruiting, electoral support, or community training rather than a physical consumer product. [8] context Environment America's scale and network position determine whether its campaigns create broad public benefit, concentrated institutional control, or both. [9]
Labor Sovereignty ? Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.	3 / 7	Environment America's worker-power record is evaluated against public descriptions of staff roles, recruiting pipelines, canvassing work, union activity, or NLRB/labor records where available. Environment America's worker-power record is evaluated against public descriptions of staff roles, recruiting pipelines, canvassing work, union activity, or NLRB/labor records where available. On Labor Sovereignty, Environment America sits in the middle: the mission can be genuinely useful, but control still runs through professional nonprofit, network, or campaign leadership. That places it above pure fundraising machinery and below organizations where workers, members, or affected communities govern the institution. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Public Interest Network and adjacent liberal activist infrastructure calibrated across network parent, canvassing arm, policy advocacy, research, student, recruiting, community-support, and electoral organizations. Linked evidence context Environment America's public record identifies it as a nonprofit, advocacy network, recruiting organization, student group, research center, or electoral advocacy organization rather than a worker-owned or user-owned cooperative. [1] context Environment America's public materials do not show binding democratic control by ordinary workers, donors, canvassers, students, constituents, or affected communities. [2] context Environment America's operating model converts donations, dues, student fees, volunteer labor, campaign work, public attention, or research into advocacy capacity. [3] Environment America's worker-power record is evaluated against public descriptions of staff roles, recruiting pipelines, canvassing work, union activity, or NLRB/labor records where available. [4] context Environment America's mission or services address public goods such as consumer protection, environmental health, democracy, education affordability, or pollution cleanup rather than ordinary private consumption. [5] context Environment America's advocacy, research, organizing, or community-support work can shift some problem-solving costs away from isolated individuals and toward organized public action. [6] context Environment America's conduct is evaluated as advocacy-market conduct: recruitment, canvassing, donor acquisition, student-fee funding, policy pressure, research publication, and public campaign framing. [7] context Environment America's core output is advocacy, research, organizing, recruiting, electoral support, or community training rather than a physical consumer product. [8] context Environment America's scale and network position determine whether its campaigns create broad public benefit, concentrated institutional control, or both. [9]
Solidarity with the Unemployed ? Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.	5 / 7	Environment America's mission or services address public goods such as consumer protection, environmental health, democracy, education affordability, or pollution cleanup rather than ordinary private consumption. Environment America's mission or services address public goods such as consumer protection, environmental health, democracy, education affordability, or pollution cleanup rather than ordinary private consumption. On Solidarity with the Unemployed, Environment America belongs above ordinary private activist contractors because the work can produce public goods and sometimes equips people to oppose stronger institutions. It remains below democratic cooperatives or community-governed public infrastructure because ordinary constituents do not hold binding control. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Public Interest Network and adjacent liberal activist infrastructure calibrated across network parent, canvassing arm, policy advocacy, research, student, recruiting, community-support, and electoral organizations. Linked evidence context Environment America's public record identifies it as a nonprofit, advocacy network, recruiting organization, student group, research center, or electoral advocacy organization rather than a worker-owned or user-owned cooperative. [1] context Environment America's public materials do not show binding democratic control by ordinary workers, donors, canvassers, students, constituents, or affected communities. [2] context Environment America's operating model converts donations, dues, student fees, volunteer labor, campaign work, public attention, or research into advocacy capacity. [3] context Environment America's worker-power record is evaluated against public descriptions of staff roles, recruiting pipelines, canvassing work, union activity, or NLRB/labor records where available. [4] Environment America's mission or services address public goods such as consumer protection, environmental health, democracy, education affordability, or pollution cleanup rather than ordinary private consumption. [5] context Environment America's advocacy, research, organizing, or community-support work can shift some problem-solving costs away from isolated individuals and toward organized public action. [6] context Environment America's conduct is evaluated as advocacy-market conduct: recruitment, canvassing, donor acquisition, student-fee funding, policy pressure, research publication, and public campaign framing. [7] context Environment America's core output is advocacy, research, organizing, recruiting, electoral support, or community training rather than a physical consumer product. [8] context Environment America's scale and network position determine whether its campaigns create broad public benefit, concentrated institutional control, or both. [9]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity ? Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.	4 / 7	Environment America's advocacy, research, organizing, or community-support work can shift some problem-solving costs away from isolated individuals and toward organized public action. Environment America's advocacy, research, organizing, or community-support work can shift some problem-solving costs away from isolated individuals and toward organized public action. On Loss-Bearing Fidelity, Environment America sits in the middle: the mission can be genuinely useful, but control still runs through professional nonprofit, network, or campaign leadership. That places it above pure fundraising machinery and below organizations where workers, members, or affected communities govern the institution. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Public Interest Network and adjacent liberal activist infrastructure calibrated across network parent, canvassing arm, policy advocacy, research, student, recruiting, community-support, and electoral organizations. Linked evidence context Environment America's public record identifies it as a nonprofit, advocacy network, recruiting organization, student group, research center, or electoral advocacy organization rather than a worker-owned or user-owned cooperative. [1] context Environment America's public materials do not show binding democratic control by ordinary workers, donors, canvassers, students, constituents, or affected communities. [2] context Environment America's operating model converts donations, dues, student fees, volunteer labor, campaign work, public attention, or research into advocacy capacity. [3] context Environment America's worker-power record is evaluated against public descriptions of staff roles, recruiting pipelines, canvassing work, union activity, or NLRB/labor records where available. [4] context Environment America's mission or services address public goods such as consumer protection, environmental health, democracy, education affordability, or pollution cleanup rather than ordinary private consumption. [5] Environment America's advocacy, research, organizing, or community-support work can shift some problem-solving costs away from isolated individuals and toward organized public action. [6] context Environment America's conduct is evaluated as advocacy-market conduct: recruitment, canvassing, donor acquisition, student-fee funding, policy pressure, research publication, and public campaign framing. [7] context Environment America's core output is advocacy, research, organizing, recruiting, electoral support, or community training rather than a physical consumer product. [8] context Environment America's scale and network position determine whether its campaigns create broad public benefit, concentrated institutional control, or both. [9]
Market Conduct ? Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.	3 / 5	Environment America's conduct is evaluated as advocacy-market conduct: recruitment, canvassing, donor acquisition, student-fee funding, policy pressure, research publication, and public campaign framing. Environment America's conduct is evaluated as advocacy-market conduct: recruitment, canvassing, donor acquisition, student-fee funding, policy pressure, research publication, and public campaign framing. On Market Conduct, Environment America sits in the middle: the mission can be genuinely useful, but control still runs through professional nonprofit, network, or campaign leadership. That places it above pure fundraising machinery and below organizations where workers, members, or affected communities govern the institution. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Public Interest Network and adjacent liberal activist infrastructure calibrated across network parent, canvassing arm, policy advocacy, research, student, recruiting, community-support, and electoral organizations. Linked evidence context Environment America's public record identifies it as a nonprofit, advocacy network, recruiting organization, student group, research center, or electoral advocacy organization rather than a worker-owned or user-owned cooperative. [1] context Environment America's public materials do not show binding democratic control by ordinary workers, donors, canvassers, students, constituents, or affected communities. [2] context Environment America's operating model converts donations, dues, student fees, volunteer labor, campaign work, public attention, or research into advocacy capacity. [3] context Environment America's worker-power record is evaluated against public descriptions of staff roles, recruiting pipelines, canvassing work, union activity, or NLRB/labor records where available. [4] context Environment America's mission or services address public goods such as consumer protection, environmental health, democracy, education affordability, or pollution cleanup rather than ordinary private consumption. [5] context Environment America's advocacy, research, organizing, or community-support work can shift some problem-solving costs away from isolated individuals and toward organized public action. [6] Environment America's conduct is evaluated as advocacy-market conduct: recruitment, canvassing, donor acquisition, student-fee funding, policy pressure, research publication, and public campaign framing. [7] context Environment America's core output is advocacy, research, organizing, recruiting, electoral support, or community training rather than a physical consumer product. [8] context Environment America's scale and network position determine whether its campaigns create broad public benefit, concentrated institutional control, or both. [9]
Product Integrity ? Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.	5 / 5	Environment America's core output is advocacy, research, organizing, recruiting, electoral support, or community training rather than a physical consumer product. Environment America's core output is advocacy, research, organizing, recruiting, electoral support, or community training rather than a physical consumer product. On Product Integrity, Environment America belongs above ordinary private activist contractors because the work can produce public goods and sometimes equips people to oppose stronger institutions. It remains below democratic cooperatives or community-governed public infrastructure because ordinary constituents do not hold binding control. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Public Interest Network and adjacent liberal activist infrastructure calibrated across network parent, canvassing arm, policy advocacy, research, student, recruiting, community-support, and electoral organizations. Linked evidence context Environment America's public record identifies it as a nonprofit, advocacy network, recruiting organization, student group, research center, or electoral advocacy organization rather than a worker-owned or user-owned cooperative. [1] context Environment America's public materials do not show binding democratic control by ordinary workers, donors, canvassers, students, constituents, or affected communities. [2] context Environment America's operating model converts donations, dues, student fees, volunteer labor, campaign work, public attention, or research into advocacy capacity. [3] context Environment America's worker-power record is evaluated against public descriptions of staff roles, recruiting pipelines, canvassing work, union activity, or NLRB/labor records where available. [4] context Environment America's mission or services address public goods such as consumer protection, environmental health, democracy, education affordability, or pollution cleanup rather than ordinary private consumption. [5] context Environment America's advocacy, research, organizing, or community-support work can shift some problem-solving costs away from isolated individuals and toward organized public action. [6] context Environment America's conduct is evaluated as advocacy-market conduct: recruitment, canvassing, donor acquisition, student-fee funding, policy pressure, research publication, and public campaign framing. [7] Environment America's core output is advocacy, research, organizing, recruiting, electoral support, or community training rather than a physical consumer product. [8] context Environment America's scale and network position determine whether its campaigns create broad public benefit, concentrated institutional control, or both. [9]
Scale Integrity ? Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.	5 / 5	Environment America's scale and network position determine whether its campaigns create broad public benefit, concentrated institutional control, or both. Environment America's scale and network position determine whether its campaigns create broad public benefit, concentrated institutional control, or both. On Scale Integrity, Environment America belongs above ordinary private activist contractors because the work can produce public goods and sometimes equips people to oppose stronger institutions. It remains below democratic cooperatives or community-governed public infrastructure because ordinary constituents do not hold binding control. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Public Interest Network and adjacent liberal activist infrastructure calibrated across network parent, canvassing arm, policy advocacy, research, student, recruiting, community-support, and electoral organizations. Linked evidence context Environment America's public record identifies it as a nonprofit, advocacy network, recruiting organization, student group, research center, or electoral advocacy organization rather than a worker-owned or user-owned cooperative. [1] context Environment America's public materials do not show binding democratic control by ordinary workers, donors, canvassers, students, constituents, or affected communities. [2] context Environment America's operating model converts donations, dues, student fees, volunteer labor, campaign work, public attention, or research into advocacy capacity. [3] context Environment America's worker-power record is evaluated against public descriptions of staff roles, recruiting pipelines, canvassing work, union activity, or NLRB/labor records where available. [4] context Environment America's mission or services address public goods such as consumer protection, environmental health, democracy, education affordability, or pollution cleanup rather than ordinary private consumption. [5] context Environment America's advocacy, research, organizing, or community-support work can shift some problem-solving costs away from isolated individuals and toward organized public action. [6] context Environment America's conduct is evaluated as advocacy-market conduct: recruitment, canvassing, donor acquisition, student-fee funding, policy pressure, research publication, and public campaign framing. [7] context Environment America's core output is advocacy, research, organizing, recruiting, electoral support, or community training rather than a physical consumer product. [8] Environment America's scale and network position determine whether its campaigns create broad public benefit, concentrated institutional control, or both. [9]

Penalties

Penalty	Applied	Why this penalty
Policy Capture ? Private-interest attempts to bend law, regulation, subsidies, taxes, enforcement, trade, labor, safety, competition, environmental, healthcare, housing, surveillance, civil-liberties, or consumer policy against workers, customers, citizens, affected communities, or ecological life. Public-interest advocacy is not penalized merely because it is lobbying. Range: -15 to 0.	-3	Environment America's own materials describe policy advocacy, lobbying, candidate support, public-pressure campaigns, or citizen mobilization aimed at changing public rules. Environment America's own materials describe policy advocacy, lobbying, candidate support, public-pressure campaigns, or citizen mobilization aimed at changing public rules. This creates a Policy Capture penalty because even public-interest lobbying is an attempt by a private institution to bend public rules. The penalty is heaviest for electoral and campaign machinery, lighter where the work mainly checks stronger private power. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Public Interest Network and adjacent liberal activist infrastructure calibrated across network parent, canvassing arm, policy advocacy, research, student, recruiting, community-support, and electoral organizations. Linked evidence Environment America's own materials describe policy advocacy, lobbying, candidate support, public-pressure campaigns, or citizen mobilization aimed at changing public rules. [14]
Youth Capture ? Manipulative youth-directed marketing, youth-data or attention monetization, collectible/add-on traps, parasocial or identity capture, surprise mechanics, or treating young people as lower-disclosure consumers. Making useful toys or welcoming children is not itself penalized. Range: -5 to 0.	-1	Environment America's model recruits, trains, bills, or mobilizes students and young organizers, making youth-culture and early-career capture a direct axis-specific concern. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Public Interest Network and adjacent liberal activist infrastructure calibrated across network parent, canvassing arm, policy advocacy, research, student, recruiting, community-support, and electoral organizations. Linked evidence Environment America's model recruits, trains, bills, or mobilizes students and young organizers, making youth-culture and early-career capture a direct axis-specific concern. [15]
Accountability Opacity ? Material opacity, reputation laundering, or hidden accountability structures that prevent public accountability. Range: -2 to 0.	-2	Environment America's public materials do not give a complete plain-language map of governance control, related entities, fund flows, staff power, and constituent consent. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Public Interest Network and adjacent liberal activist infrastructure calibrated across network parent, canvassing arm, policy advocacy, research, student, recruiting, community-support, and electoral organizations. Linked evidence Environment America's public materials do not give a complete plain-language map of governance control, related entities, fund flows, staff power, and constituent consent. [16]
Identity Capture ? Customer pressure, employee pressure, and pervasive identity saturation. Range: -3 to 0.	-2	Environment America's mission framing can bind staff, students, donors, and volunteers to a moralized activist identity as well as to specific practical public goals. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Public Interest Network and adjacent liberal activist infrastructure calibrated across network parent, canvassing arm, policy advocacy, research, student, recruiting, community-support, and electoral organizations. Linked evidence Environment America's mission framing can bind staff, students, donors, and volunteers to a moralized activist identity as well as to specific practical public goals. [17]
Ideological Disavowal ? Concealed ideology presented as neutrality, expertise, professional necessity, public-service administration, market inevitability, or non-ideological common sense while exercising power. Range: -3 to 0.	-1	Environment America's public language often presents a contested political program as public interest, fairness, science, democracy, or nonpartisan necessity rather than as an explicit ideological standpoint. Environment America's public language often presents a contested political program as public interest, fairness, science, democracy, or nonpartisan necessity rather than as an explicit ideological standpoint. This creates a Ideological Disavowal penalty because the problem is not having progressive politics; the problem is presenting contested ideology as neutral public interest or simple decency while exercising institutional power. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Public Interest Network and adjacent liberal activist infrastructure calibrated across network parent, canvassing arm, policy advocacy, research, student, recruiting, community-support, and electoral organizations. Linked evidence Environment America's public language often presents a contested political program as public interest, fairness, science, democracy, or nonpartisan necessity rather than as an explicit ideological standpoint. [18]

Bonus Credits

Bonus	Credit	Why this credit
Openness to Dissent ? Credit for tolerating internal, user, customer, worker, and public dissent without retaliation, capture, or viewpoint laundering.	1 / 3	Environment America's advocacy challenges corporate, governmental, or institutional power in public policy disputes, which can create some civic space for dissent. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Public Interest Network and adjacent liberal activist infrastructure calibrated across network parent, canvassing arm, policy advocacy, research, student, recruiting, community-support, and electoral organizations. Linked evidence Environment America's advocacy challenges corporate, governmental, or institutional power in public policy disputes, which can create some civic space for dissent. [10]
Constitutional Spirit ? Credit for respecting constitutional rights and civil-liberties norms even where private law does not strictly require it.	2 / 3	Environment America's work uses research, litigation, public education, policy advocacy, or electoral engagement to contest stronger institutions through civic channels. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Public Interest Network and adjacent liberal activist infrastructure calibrated across network parent, canvassing arm, policy advocacy, research, student, recruiting, community-support, and electoral organizations. Linked evidence Environment America's work uses research, litigation, public education, policy advocacy, or electoral engagement to contest stronger institutions through civic channels. [11]
Good Deal ? Credit for unusually fair value: durable quality, fair pricing, low lock-in, and clear customer surplus.	1 / 3	Environment America's public-facing work can give people research, organizing help, consumer protection, environmental benefit, or civic capacity without ordinary purchase lock-in. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Public Interest Network and adjacent liberal activist infrastructure calibrated across network parent, canvassing arm, policy advocacy, research, student, recruiting, community-support, and electoral organizations. Linked evidence Environment America's public-facing work can give people research, organizing help, consumer protection, environmental benefit, or civic capacity without ordinary purchase lock-in. [12]
Cost Transparency ? Credit for clear posted prices, all-in fees, unit costs, public rate cards, margin/cost visibility, or surplus-allocation transparency, especially in markets where opaque quotes, hidden fees, or individualized pricing are normal.	1 / 3	Environment America's nonprofit status, public web materials, annual-report materials, or fee disclosures give some but incomplete transparency into the cost of its work. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Public Interest Network and adjacent liberal activist infrastructure calibrated across network parent, canvassing arm, policy advocacy, research, student, recruiting, community-support, and electoral organizations. Linked evidence Environment America's nonprofit status, public web materials, annual-report materials, or fee disclosures give some but incomplete transparency into the cost of its work. [13]

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

High 81/100

18 verified linked claims 18 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 18/18 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 16/20

18 verified linked claims

Source quality 12/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 14/18

18 direct claims across 18 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 10/10

18/18 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending

VerificationUnverified

ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)

ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)

Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.

Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

1Environment America's public record identifies it as a nonprofit, advocacy network, recruiting organization, student group, research center, or electoral advocacy organization rather than a worker-owned or user-owned cooperative.

Ownership Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Environment America aboutOfficial self-description · 68%

2Environment America's public materials do not show binding democratic control by ordinary workers, donors, canvassers, students, constituents, or affected communities.

Governance Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Environment America aboutOfficial self-description · 68%

3Environment America's operating model converts donations, dues, student fees, volunteer labor, campaign work, public attention, or research into advocacy capacity.

Extraction Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Environment America aboutOfficial self-description · 68%

4Environment America's worker-power record is evaluated against public descriptions of staff roles, recruiting pipelines, canvassing work, union activity, or NLRB/labor records where available.

Labor Sovereignty Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

The Public Interest Network aboutOfficial self-description · 68%

5Environment America's mission or services address public goods such as consumer protection, environmental health, democracy, education affordability, or pollution cleanup rather than ordinary private consumption.

Solidarity Unemployed Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Environment America aboutOfficial self-description · 68%

6Environment America's advocacy, research, organizing, or community-support work can shift some problem-solving costs away from isolated individuals and toward organized public action.

Loss Bearing Fidelity Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Environment America aboutOfficial self-description · 68%

7Environment America's conduct is evaluated as advocacy-market conduct: recruitment, canvassing, donor acquisition, student-fee funding, policy pressure, research publication, and public campaign framing.

Market Conduct Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

The Public Interest Network aboutOfficial self-description · 68%

8Environment America's core output is advocacy, research, organizing, recruiting, electoral support, or community training rather than a physical consumer product.

Product Integrity Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Environment America aboutOfficial self-description · 68%

9Environment America's scale and network position determine whether its campaigns create broad public benefit, concentrated institutional control, or both.

Scale Integrity Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

The Public Interest Network aboutOfficial self-description · 68%

10Environment America's advocacy challenges corporate, governmental, or institutional power in public policy disputes, which can create some civic space for dissent.

Openness To Dissent Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Environment America aboutOfficial self-description · 68%

11Environment America's work uses research, litigation, public education, policy advocacy, or electoral engagement to contest stronger institutions through civic channels.

Constitutional Spirit Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Environment America aboutOfficial self-description · 68%

12Environment America's public-facing work can give people research, organizing help, consumer protection, environmental benefit, or civic capacity without ordinary purchase lock-in.

Good Deal Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Environment America aboutOfficial self-description · 68%

13Environment America's nonprofit status, public web materials, annual-report materials, or fee disclosures give some but incomplete transparency into the cost of its work.

Cost Transparency Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Environment America aboutOfficial self-description · 68%

14Environment America's own materials describe policy advocacy, lobbying, candidate support, public-pressure campaigns, or citizen mobilization aimed at changing public rules.

Policy Capture Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Environment America aboutOfficial self-description · 68%

15Environment America's model recruits, trains, bills, or mobilizes students and young organizers, making youth-culture and early-career capture a direct axis-specific concern.

Youth Capture Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Environment America aboutOfficial self-description · 68%

16Environment America's public materials do not give a complete plain-language map of governance control, related entities, fund flows, staff power, and constituent consent.

Accountability Opacity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

The Public Interest Network aboutOfficial self-description · 68%

17Environment America's mission framing can bind staff, students, donors, and volunteers to a moralized activist identity as well as to specific practical public goals.

Identity Capture Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Environment America aboutOfficial self-description · 68%

18Environment America's public language often presents a contested political program as public interest, fairness, science, democracy, or nonpartisan necessity rather than as an explicit ideological standpoint.

Ideological Disavowal Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Environment America aboutOfficial self-description · 68%

Alternatives

Competitors

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for Environment America Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.

View Full Audit Log