private video-game and platform company

Epic Games

A private game and platform company behind Fortnite, Unreal Engine, Epic Games Store, Rocket League, and creator-economy tools. Epic Games remains weak because of youth capture, surveillance capture, and documented human harm, even where the product or service has practical value.

Why this matters: Epic Games is a severe youth-capture case because genuine technology and creator value are paired with the FTC’s Fortnite privacy, dark-pattern, and unwanted-charge settlement.

Letter grade F Malignant Medium confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1 Last reviewed May 7, 2026

Final Score -2* F - Malignant

FMALIGNANT-2 pts

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material21

Bonus+2

Cap35Ownership <= 2 and Governance <= 2

After Cap23

Penalties-25

Private Government badge

Epic Games receives the Private Government badge because it combines large-scale private rule-setting over customers, workers, users, members, or counterparties with OpenLobby-documented lobbying of about $3.9M on public policy issues.

Evidence: [13]

!Not Verified

Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Evaluation Overview

F - Malignant

The score turns mainly on Extraction, with the largest penalty coming from Policy Capture.

Strengths

Extraction3/10
Labor Sovereignty3/7
Solidarity with the Unemployed3/7

Penalties

Policy Capture-7
Youth Capture-5
Surveillance Capture-4
Human Harm-3

Evidence state

ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessExtensive (AI)
Linked claims13
Direct axis claims11
Coverage11/18

Scoring Axes

Axis	Score	Why this score
Ownership ? Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.	2 / 10	Epic Games is privately controlled rather than worker-, user-, or creator-owned. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Toy, video-game, tabletop, and game-retail expansion; compare against Nintendo, Valve, Sony, Microsoft, Disney, GameStop, Hasbro, LEGO, Roblox, itch.io, Green Toys, PlanToys, and The Game Crafter. Uncertainty Focused category expansion based on public sources; a later pass should add more jurisdiction-specific labor, supply-chain, privacy, and product-safety evidence. Linked evidence Epic Games is privately controlled rather than worker-, user-, or creator-owned. [1] context Epic makes Fortnite, Unreal Engine, Epic Games Store, Rocket League, and other game-platform products. [2] context The FTC alleged Fortnite violated children’s privacy law and used dark patterns and unwanted billing practices, resulting in settlements totaling more than $520 million. [3]
Governance ? Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.	2 / 10	Epic Games is privately controlled rather than worker-, user-, or creator-owned. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Toy, video-game, tabletop, and game-retail expansion; compare against Nintendo, Valve, Sony, Microsoft, Disney, GameStop, Hasbro, LEGO, Roblox, itch.io, Green Toys, PlanToys, and The Game Crafter. Uncertainty Focused category expansion based on public sources; a later pass should add more jurisdiction-specific labor, supply-chain, privacy, and product-safety evidence. Linked evidence context Epic Games is privately controlled rather than worker-, user-, or creator-owned. [1] context Epic makes Fortnite, Unreal Engine, Epic Games Store, Rocket League, and other game-platform products. [2] context The FTC alleged Fortnite violated children’s privacy law and used dark patterns and unwanted billing practices, resulting in settlements totaling more than $520 million. [3]
Extraction ? Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.	3 / 10	Epic Games is privately controlled rather than worker-, user-, or creator-owned. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Toy, video-game, tabletop, and game-retail expansion; compare against Nintendo, Valve, Sony, Microsoft, Disney, GameStop, Hasbro, LEGO, Roblox, itch.io, Green Toys, PlanToys, and The Game Crafter. Uncertainty Focused category expansion based on public sources; a later pass should add more jurisdiction-specific labor, supply-chain, privacy, and product-safety evidence. Linked evidence context Epic Games is privately controlled rather than worker-, user-, or creator-owned. [1] context Epic makes Fortnite, Unreal Engine, Epic Games Store, Rocket League, and other game-platform products. [2] context The FTC alleged Fortnite violated children’s privacy law and used dark patterns and unwanted billing practices, resulting in settlements totaling more than $520 million. [3]
Labor Sovereignty ? Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.	3 / 7	Epic Games is privately controlled rather than worker-, user-, or creator-owned. Epic Games is privately controlled rather than worker-, user-, or creator-owned. That places Epic Games in the middle of Labor Sovereignty: workers or participants have some protection or agency, but not enough binding power to control the relationship. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Toy, video-game, tabletop, and game-retail expansion; compare against Nintendo, Valve, Sony, Microsoft, Disney, GameStop, Hasbro, LEGO, Roblox, itch.io, Green Toys, PlanToys, and The Game Crafter. Uncertainty Focused category expansion based on public sources; a later pass should add more jurisdiction-specific labor, supply-chain, privacy, and product-safety evidence. Linked evidence context Epic Games is privately controlled rather than worker-, user-, or creator-owned. [1] context Epic makes Fortnite, Unreal Engine, Epic Games Store, Rocket League, and other game-platform products. [2] context The FTC alleged Fortnite violated children’s privacy law and used dark patterns and unwanted billing practices, resulting in settlements totaling more than $520 million. [3]
Solidarity with the Unemployed ? Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.	3 / 7	Epic Games is privately controlled rather than worker-, user-, or creator-owned. Epic Games is privately controlled rather than worker-, user-, or creator-owned. That places Epic Games in the middle of Solidarity with the Unemployed: some access, severance, retraining, openness, or mutual-aid value is present, but it is not central or durable. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Toy, video-game, tabletop, and game-retail expansion; compare against Nintendo, Valve, Sony, Microsoft, Disney, GameStop, Hasbro, LEGO, Roblox, itch.io, Green Toys, PlanToys, and The Game Crafter. Uncertainty Focused category expansion based on public sources; a later pass should add more jurisdiction-specific labor, supply-chain, privacy, and product-safety evidence. Linked evidence context Epic Games is privately controlled rather than worker-, user-, or creator-owned. [1] context Epic makes Fortnite, Unreal Engine, Epic Games Store, Rocket League, and other game-platform products. [2] context The FTC alleged Fortnite violated children’s privacy law and used dark patterns and unwanted billing practices, resulting in settlements totaling more than $520 million. [3]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity ? Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.	2 / 7	Epic Games is privately controlled rather than worker-, user-, or creator-owned. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Toy, video-game, tabletop, and game-retail expansion; compare against Nintendo, Valve, Sony, Microsoft, Disney, GameStop, Hasbro, LEGO, Roblox, itch.io, Green Toys, PlanToys, and The Game Crafter. Uncertainty Focused category expansion based on public sources; a later pass should add more jurisdiction-specific labor, supply-chain, privacy, and product-safety evidence. Linked evidence context Epic Games is privately controlled rather than worker-, user-, or creator-owned. [1] context Epic makes Fortnite, Unreal Engine, Epic Games Store, Rocket League, and other game-platform products. [2] context The FTC alleged Fortnite violated children’s privacy law and used dark patterns and unwanted billing practices, resulting in settlements totaling more than $520 million. [3]
Market Conduct ? Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.	1 / 5	Epic Games is privately controlled rather than worker-, user-, or creator-owned. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Toy, video-game, tabletop, and game-retail expansion; compare against Nintendo, Valve, Sony, Microsoft, Disney, GameStop, Hasbro, LEGO, Roblox, itch.io, Green Toys, PlanToys, and The Game Crafter. Uncertainty Focused category expansion based on public sources; a later pass should add more jurisdiction-specific labor, supply-chain, privacy, and product-safety evidence. Linked evidence context Epic Games is privately controlled rather than worker-, user-, or creator-owned. [1] context Epic makes Fortnite, Unreal Engine, Epic Games Store, Rocket League, and other game-platform products. [2] context The FTC alleged Fortnite violated children’s privacy law and used dark patterns and unwanted billing practices, resulting in settlements totaling more than $520 million. [3]
Product Integrity ? Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.	3 / 5	Epic makes Fortnite, Unreal Engine, Epic Games Store, Rocket League, and other game-platform products. Epic makes Fortnite, Unreal Engine, Epic Games Store, Rocket League, and other game-platform products. That places Epic Games in the middle of Product Integrity: the product has real use value but is compromised by incentives, monetization, lock-in, quality degradation, or risk. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Toy, video-game, tabletop, and game-retail expansion; compare against Nintendo, Valve, Sony, Microsoft, Disney, GameStop, Hasbro, LEGO, Roblox, itch.io, Green Toys, PlanToys, and The Game Crafter. Uncertainty Focused category expansion based on public sources; a later pass should add more jurisdiction-specific labor, supply-chain, privacy, and product-safety evidence. Linked evidence context Epic Games is privately controlled rather than worker-, user-, or creator-owned. [1] Epic makes Fortnite, Unreal Engine, Epic Games Store, Rocket League, and other game-platform products. [2] context The FTC alleged Fortnite violated children’s privacy law and used dark patterns and unwanted billing practices, resulting in settlements totaling more than $520 million. [3]
Scale Integrity ? Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.	2 / 5	Epic Games is privately controlled rather than worker-, user-, or creator-owned. Epic Games is privately controlled rather than worker-, user-, or creator-owned. That places Epic Games in the middle of Scale Integrity: scale brings useful reach but also weakens accountability, transparency, or local constraint. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Toy, video-game, tabletop, and game-retail expansion; compare against Nintendo, Valve, Sony, Microsoft, Disney, GameStop, Hasbro, LEGO, Roblox, itch.io, Green Toys, PlanToys, and The Game Crafter. Uncertainty Focused category expansion based on public sources; a later pass should add more jurisdiction-specific labor, supply-chain, privacy, and product-safety evidence. Linked evidence context Epic Games is privately controlled rather than worker-, user-, or creator-owned. [1] context Epic makes Fortnite, Unreal Engine, Epic Games Store, Rocket League, and other game-platform products. [2] context The FTC alleged Fortnite violated children’s privacy law and used dark patterns and unwanted billing practices, resulting in settlements totaling more than $520 million. [3]

Penalties

Penalty	Applied	Why this penalty
Human Harm ? Severity, scale, culpability, vulnerable targets, willful reoffense, reputation laundering, pattern escalation, and time decay. Range: -20 to 0.	-3	The FTC alleged Fortnite violated children’s privacy law and used dark patterns and unwanted billing practices, resulting in settlements totaling more than $520 million. The FTC alleged Fortnite violated children’s privacy law and used dark patterns and unwanted billing practices, resulting in settlements totaling more than $520 million. That warrants a limited Human Harm penalty because ordinary operation, documented misconduct, or institutional power creates serious injury, deprivation, abuse, or foreseeable human damage. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Toy, video-game, tabletop, and game-retail expansion; compare against Nintendo, Valve, Sony, Microsoft, Disney, GameStop, Hasbro, LEGO, Roblox, itch.io, Green Toys, PlanToys, and The Game Crafter. Uncertainty Focused category expansion based on public sources; a later pass should add more jurisdiction-specific labor, supply-chain, privacy, and product-safety evidence. Linked evidence The FTC alleged Fortnite violated children’s privacy law and used dark patterns and unwanted billing practices, resulting in settlements totaling more than $520 million. [6]
Policy Capture ? Private-interest attempts to bend law, regulation, subsidies, taxes, enforcement, trade, labor, safety, competition, environmental, healthcare, housing, surveillance, civil-liberties, or consumer policy against workers, customers, citizens, affected communities, or ecological life. Public-interest advocacy is not penalized merely because it is lobbying. Range: -15 to 0.	-7	OpenLobby records EPIC GAMES, INC. lobbying on consumer protection, labor, consumer product safety with about $3.9M in spending across 18 filings; the reviewed filings document private… OpenLobby records EPIC GAMES, INC. lobbying on consumer protection, labor, consumer product safety with about $3.9M in spending across 18 filings; the reviewed filings document private institutional lobbying over public rules rather than a public-interest advocacy role. That warrants a substantial Policy Capture penalty because private institutional pressure is being applied to public rules while affected people cannot democratically govern that agenda. The value is substantial but not at the floor because the linked record shows serious conduct without the strongest aggravating factors on this axis. Linked evidence OpenLobby records EPIC GAMES, INC. lobbying on consumer protection, labor, consumer product safety with about $3.9M in spending across 18 filings; the reviewed filings document private institutional lobbying over public rules rather than a public-interest advocacy role. [12]
Youth Capture ? Manipulative youth-directed marketing, youth-data or attention monetization, collectible/add-on traps, parasocial or identity capture, surprise mechanics, or treating young people as lower-disclosure consumers. Making useful toys or welcoming children is not itself penalized. Range: -5 to 0.	-5	The FTC alleged Fortnite violated children’s privacy law and used dark patterns and unwanted billing practices, resulting in settlements totaling more than $520 million. The FTC alleged Fortnite violated children’s privacy law and used dark patterns and unwanted billing practices, resulting in settlements totaling more than $520 million. That warrants a severe Youth Capture penalty because young people are treated as manipulable consumers, data sources, attention targets, or culture markets. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Toy, video-game, tabletop, and game-retail expansion; compare against Nintendo, Valve, Sony, Microsoft, Disney, GameStop, Hasbro, LEGO, Roblox, itch.io, Green Toys, PlanToys, and The Game Crafter. Uncertainty Focused category expansion based on public sources; a later pass should add more jurisdiction-specific labor, supply-chain, privacy, and product-safety evidence. Linked evidence The FTC alleged Fortnite violated children’s privacy law and used dark patterns and unwanted billing practices, resulting in settlements totaling more than $520 million. [7]
Accountability Opacity ? Material opacity, reputation laundering, or hidden accountability structures that prevent public accountability. Range: -2 to 0.	-2	The FTC alleged Fortnite violated children’s privacy law and used dark patterns and unwanted billing practices, resulting in settlements totaling more than $520 million. The FTC alleged Fortnite violated children’s privacy law and used dark patterns and unwanted billing practices, resulting in settlements totaling more than $520 million. That warrants a severe Accountability Opacity penalty because material facts, risks, conflicts, ownership, or accountability information are obscured from the public. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Toy, video-game, tabletop, and game-retail expansion; compare against Nintendo, Valve, Sony, Microsoft, Disney, GameStop, Hasbro, LEGO, Roblox, itch.io, Green Toys, PlanToys, and The Game Crafter. Uncertainty Focused category expansion based on public sources; a later pass should add more jurisdiction-specific labor, supply-chain, privacy, and product-safety evidence. Linked evidence The FTC alleged Fortnite violated children’s privacy law and used dark patterns and unwanted billing practices, resulting in settlements totaling more than $520 million. [8]
Identity Capture ? Customer pressure, employee pressure, and pervasive identity saturation. Range: -3 to 0.	-3	The FTC alleged Fortnite violated children’s privacy law and used dark patterns and unwanted billing practices, resulting in settlements totaling more than $520 million. The FTC alleged Fortnite violated children’s privacy law and used dark patterns and unwanted billing practices, resulting in settlements totaling more than $520 million. That warrants a severe Identity Capture penalty because users, workers, customers, or publics are pressured into identity attachment that protects institutional power. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Toy, video-game, tabletop, and game-retail expansion; compare against Nintendo, Valve, Sony, Microsoft, Disney, GameStop, Hasbro, LEGO, Roblox, itch.io, Green Toys, PlanToys, and The Game Crafter. Uncertainty Focused category expansion based on public sources; a later pass should add more jurisdiction-specific labor, supply-chain, privacy, and product-safety evidence. Linked evidence The FTC alleged Fortnite violated children’s privacy law and used dark patterns and unwanted billing practices, resulting in settlements totaling more than $520 million. [9]
Surveillance Capture ? Invasive surveillance, unreasonably non-optional tracking, facial recognition, biometric identification, or AI behavior scanning of customers, workers, bystanders, or the public. Range: -5 to 0.	-4	The FTC alleged Fortnite violated children’s privacy law and used dark patterns and unwanted billing practices, resulting in settlements totaling more than $520 million. The FTC alleged Fortnite violated children’s privacy law and used dark patterns and unwanted billing practices, resulting in settlements totaling more than $520 million. That warrants a severe Surveillance Capture penalty because customers, workers, users, bystanders, or the public are exposed to invasive tracking, biometrics, or behavior scanning. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Toy, video-game, tabletop, and game-retail expansion; compare against Nintendo, Valve, Sony, Microsoft, Disney, GameStop, Hasbro, LEGO, Roblox, itch.io, Green Toys, PlanToys, and The Game Crafter. Uncertainty Focused category expansion based on public sources; a later pass should add more jurisdiction-specific labor, supply-chain, privacy, and product-safety evidence. Linked evidence The FTC alleged Fortnite violated children’s privacy law and used dark patterns and unwanted billing practices, resulting in settlements totaling more than $520 million. [10]
Ideological Disavowal ? Concealed ideology presented as neutrality, expertise, professional necessity, public-service administration, market inevitability, or non-ideological common sense while exercising power. Range: -3 to 0.	-1	Epic Games's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Epic Games shows bounded neutrality theater: some contested choices are softened through expertise,… Epic Games's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Epic Games shows bounded neutrality theater: some contested choices are softened through expertise, public-interest, professional, market, safety, or institutional language, but the record does not show dominant concealment of standpoint. That warrants a limited Ideological Disavowal penalty because the institution presents situated, contested choices as neutrality, expertise, inevitability, safety, or common sense. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Ideological Disavowal 0 to -3 recalibration: 0 for explicit standpoint or no penalty-level neutrality theater; -1 for bounded softening of contested choices; -2 for strong neutrality theater by a powerful institution; -3 for major gatekeeping or coercive power presented as neutral, necessary, objective, or non-ideological. Uncertainty This recalibration uses public self-presentation and profile evidence; later review should add direct language-analysis evidence for high-impact institutions. Linked evidence Epic Games's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Epic Games shows bounded neutrality theater: some contested choices are softened through expertise, public-interest, professional, market, safety, or institutional language, but the record does not show dominant concealment of standpoint. [11]

Bonus Credits

Bonus	Credit	Why this credit
Openness to Dissent ? Credit for tolerating internal, user, customer, worker, and public dissent without retaliation, capture, or viewpoint laundering.	1 / 3	The FTC alleged Fortnite violated children’s privacy law and used dark patterns and unwanted billing practices, resulting in settlements totaling more than $520 million. The FTC alleged Fortnite violated children’s privacy law and used dark patterns and unwanted billing practices, resulting in settlements totaling more than $520 million. That supports partial Openness to Dissent credit because people can criticize, dissent, or challenge the institution without being managed into silence. The value remains partial because the linked record does not show the practice as comprehensive, durable, or central enough for full credit. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Toy, video-game, tabletop, and game-retail expansion; compare against Nintendo, Valve, Sony, Microsoft, Disney, GameStop, Hasbro, LEGO, Roblox, itch.io, Green Toys, PlanToys, and The Game Crafter. Uncertainty Focused category expansion based on public sources; a later pass should add more jurisdiction-specific labor, supply-chain, privacy, and product-safety evidence. Linked evidence The FTC alleged Fortnite violated children’s privacy law and used dark patterns and unwanted billing practices, resulting in settlements totaling more than $520 million. [4]
Cost Transparency ? Credit for clear posted prices, all-in fees, unit costs, public rate cards, margin/cost visibility, or surplus-allocation transparency, especially in markets where opaque quotes, hidden fees, or individualized pricing are normal.	1 / 3	Epic Games is privately controlled rather than worker-, user-, or creator-owned. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Toy, video-game, tabletop, and game-retail expansion; compare against Nintendo, Valve, Sony, Microsoft, Disney, GameStop, Hasbro, LEGO, Roblox, itch.io, Green Toys, PlanToys, and The Game Crafter. Uncertainty Focused category expansion based on public sources; a later pass should add more jurisdiction-specific labor, supply-chain, privacy, and product-safety evidence. Linked evidence Epic Games is privately controlled rather than worker-, user-, or creator-owned. [5]

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

Medium 73/100

12 verified linked claims 11 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 11/18 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 14/20

12 verified linked claims

Source quality 15/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 9/18

11 direct claims across 18 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 6/10

11/18 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending

VerificationUnverified

ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)

ThoroughnessExtensive (AI)

Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.

Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

1Epic Games is privately controlled rather than worker-, user-, or creator-owned.

Ownership Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 7, 2026

AI scaffold

Epic Games aboutOfficial self-description · 68%
Epic Games StoreGeneral web source · 58%

2Epic makes Fortnite, Unreal Engine, Epic Games Store, Rocket League, and other game-platform products.

Product Integrity Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 7, 2026

AI scaffold

Epic Games aboutOfficial self-description · 68%
Epic Games StoreGeneral web source · 58%

3The FTC alleged Fortnite violated children’s privacy law and used dark patterns and unwanted billing practices, resulting in settlements totaling more than $520 million.

Calculation Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 7, 2026

AI scaffold

FTC: Epic Games to pay over $520 million over Fortnite allegationsPrimary public record · 100%

4The FTC alleged Fortnite violated children’s privacy law and used dark patterns and unwanted billing practices, resulting in settlements totaling more than $520 million.

Openness To Dissent Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 7, 2026

AI scaffold

Epic Games aboutOfficial self-description · 68%
Epic Games StoreGeneral web source · 58%

5Epic Games is privately controlled rather than worker-, user-, or creator-owned.

Cost Transparency Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 7, 2026

AI scaffold

Epic Games aboutOfficial self-description · 68%
Epic Games StoreGeneral web source · 58%

6The FTC alleged Fortnite violated children’s privacy law and used dark patterns and unwanted billing practices, resulting in settlements totaling more than $520 million.

Human Harm Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 7, 2026

AI scaffold

FTC: Epic Games to pay over $520 million over Fortnite allegationsPrimary public record · 100%

7The FTC alleged Fortnite violated children’s privacy law and used dark patterns and unwanted billing practices, resulting in settlements totaling more than $520 million.

Youth Capture Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 7, 2026

AI scaffold

FTC: Epic Games to pay over $520 million over Fortnite allegationsPrimary public record · 100%

8The FTC alleged Fortnite violated children’s privacy law and used dark patterns and unwanted billing practices, resulting in settlements totaling more than $520 million.

Accountability Opacity Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 7, 2026

AI scaffold

FTC: Epic Games to pay over $520 million over Fortnite allegationsPrimary public record · 100%

9The FTC alleged Fortnite violated children’s privacy law and used dark patterns and unwanted billing practices, resulting in settlements totaling more than $520 million.

Identity Capture Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 7, 2026

AI scaffold

FTC: Epic Games to pay over $520 million over Fortnite allegationsPrimary public record · 100%

10The FTC alleged Fortnite violated children’s privacy law and used dark patterns and unwanted billing practices, resulting in settlements totaling more than $520 million.

Surveillance Capture Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 7, 2026

AI scaffold

FTC: Epic Games to pay over $520 million over Fortnite allegationsPrimary public record · 100%

11Epic Games's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Epic Games shows bounded neutrality theater: some contested choices are softened through expertise, public-interest, professional, market, safety, or institutional language, but the record does not show dominant concealment of standpoint.

Ideological Disavowal Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 9, 2026

AI scaffold

Epic Games official siteGeneral web source · 58%
Epic Games aboutOfficial self-description · 68%
Epic Games StoreGeneral web source · 58%

12OpenLobby records EPIC GAMES, INC. lobbying on consumer protection, labor, consumer product safety with about $3.9M in spending across 18 filings; the reviewed filings document private institutional lobbying over public rules rather than a public-interest advocacy role.

Policy Capture Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

OpenLobby — EPIC GAMES, INC. lobbying profileGeneral web source · 58%

13Epic Games receives the Private Government badge because it combines large-scale private rule-setting over customers, workers, users, members, or counterparties with OpenLobby-documented lobbying of about $3.9M on public policy issues.

Private Government Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

OpenLobby — EPIC GAMES, INC. lobbying profileGeneral web source · 58%

Alternatives

Competitors

AGOOD63 Future Club employee-owned cooperative game studio · same market AGOOD61 Means Interactive cooperative game publisher · same market AGOOD56 Stocksy United artist cooperative platform · same market AGOOD50 The Game Crafter independent tabletop game manufacturing marketplace · same market BQUALIFIED48 ConcernedApe independent game developer and publisher · same market BQUALIFIED48 Green Toys sustainable toy company · same market BQUALIFIED48 Resonate platform cooperative · same market BQUALIFIED48 Supergiant Games independent video-game studio · same market

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for Epic Games Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.

View Full Audit Log