nonprofit fundraising platform
Every.org
Industry Aid
A nonprofit giving platform that lets donors give to U.S. nonprofits and emphasizes no platform fees, transparent payment costs, and broad nonprofit access. Every.org scores well because the model leaves more value with stakeholders and ownership is comparatively aligned, though person-dependent governance still limits the evaluation.
Why this matters: A no-platform-fee nonprofit fundraising layer is a strong positive reference point for donor infrastructure.
Letter grade A Good Medium confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1
Final Score
58* A - Good
A* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.
Represent this organization?
Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.
Evaluation Overview
A - Good
The score turns mainly on Extraction, with the largest penalty coming from Reversibility.
Strengths
- Extraction9/10
- Ownership8/10
- Governance7/10
Penalties
- Reversibility-5
Evidence state
- ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)
- ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
- Linked claims8
- Direct axis claims7
- Coverage7/14
Scoring Axes
| Axis | Score | Why this score |
|---|---|---|
Ownership
?
Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control
at 10.
|
8 / 10 | |
Governance
?
Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic
stakeholder control at 10.
|
7 / 10 | |
Extraction
?
Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured
extraction judgment.
|
9 / 10 | |
Labor Sovereignty
?
Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at
7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence
shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling,
retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of
worker voice, or extreme turnover.
|
3 / 7 | |
Solidarity with the
Unemployed
?
Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment,
and non-competes.
|
5 / 7 | |
Loss-Bearing Fidelity
?
Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and
public obligations.
|
7 / 7 | |
Market Conduct
?
Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.
|
5 / 5 | |
Product Integrity
?
Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.
|
5 / 5 |
Every.org states that it charges no platform fees and discloses payment-processing and optional tip economics. |
Scale Integrity
?
Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.
|
5 / 5 |
Penalties
| Penalty | Applied | Why this penalty |
|---|---|---|
Reversibility
?
Applied when positive conduct depends on current living leaders,
founders, family owners, or other person-contingent governance rather
than durable structure. Range: -5 to 0.
|
-5 |
The organization’s positive conduct depends materially on current leadership, nonprofit or platform policy, accreditation rules, religious culture, or discretionary operating practice rather than on locked worker or affected-stakeholder control. Linked evidence
|
Bonus Credits
| Bonus | Credit | Why this credit |
|---|---|---|
Openness to Dissent
?
Credit for tolerating internal, user, customer, worker, and public
dissent without retaliation, capture, or viewpoint laundering.
|
1 / 3 |
Every.org gives many nonprofits access to fundraising pages, but the platform itself remains centrally governed. Linked evidence
|
Constitutional Spirit
?
Credit for respecting constitutional rights and civil-liberties norms
even where private law does not strictly require it.
|
2 / 3 |
Every.org supports broad nonprofit giving infrastructure rather than cause capture by a single institution. Linked evidence
|
Good Deal
?
Credit for unusually fair value: durable quality, fair pricing, low
lock-in, and clear customer surplus.
|
3 / 3 |
A no-platform-fee giving interface creates strong donor and recipient value relative to extractive fundraising layers. Linked evidence
|
Cost Transparency
?
Credit for clear posted prices, all-in fees, unit costs, public rate
cards, margin/cost visibility, or surplus-allocation transparency,
especially in markets where opaque quotes, hidden fees, or
individualized pricing are normal.
|
3 / 3 |
Every.org publishes fee information, including no platform fee and payment-processing cost handling. Linked evidence
|
Confidence Basis
Confidence Basis
Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.
Medium 68/100
8 verified linked claims 7 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 7/14 components covered
This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.
Claim confidence 13/20
8 verified linked claims
Source quality 12/18
Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability
Direct axis-specific claims 9/18
7 direct claims across 14 active components
Dispute load 12/12
0 disputed claims on this entity
Recency 10/10
Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026
Reviewer status 7/12
Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding
Component coverage 5/10
7/14 evidence-bearing components have direct support
Evidence State
Evidence State
Profile stateAI draft / human-pending
VerificationUnverified
ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for
factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation
mistakes.
Company responseCompany representatives can
submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or
reviewer authority.
Claims and Sources
Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.
* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.1Every.org is a nonprofit fundraising platform for giving to nonprofits.
- Every.org AboutOfficial self-description · 68%
2Every.org states that it charges no platform fees and discloses payment-processing and optional tip economics.
- Every.org FeesGeneral web source · 58%
3Every.org gives many nonprofits access to fundraising pages, but the platform itself remains centrally governed.
- Every.org AboutOfficial self-description · 68%
4Every.org supports broad nonprofit giving infrastructure rather than cause capture by a single institution.
- Every.org AboutOfficial self-description · 68%
5A no-platform-fee giving interface creates strong donor and recipient value relative to extractive fundraising layers.
- Every.org FeesGeneral web source · 58%
6Every.org publishes fee information, including no platform fee and payment-processing cost handling.
- Every.org FeesGeneral web source · 58%
7The organization’s positive conduct depends materially on current leadership, nonprofit or platform policy, accreditation rules, religious culture, or discretionary operating practice rather than on locked worker or affected-stakeholder control.
- Every.org AboutOfficial self-description · 68%
8Every.org's public materials state a mission, values, ownership model, advocacy role, or institutional standpoint plainly enough that this record does not identify penalty-level neutrality theater.
- Every.org official siteGeneral web source · 58%
- Every.org AboutOfficial self-description · 68%
- Every.org FeesGeneral web source · 58%
Help Improve This Profile
Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.
How This Page Is Maintained
Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.
Civic Note
Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.
Submit evidence for Every.org Add one source-backed fact for review.
Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.
Audit Log
Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.
Added source-backed evaluation during accreditation/watchdog, charity/humanitarian, fundraising-platform, and religious-institution expansion pass.