public company

ExxonMobil

Industry Energy

A public oil and gas major whose core products drive climate and ecological harm, with a history of resisting shareholder climate pressure. ExxonMobil scores low because of ecological harm, documented human harm, and person-dependent governance, with poor loss-bearing fidelity reinforcing the negative evaluation.

Why this matters: Ecological harm can set the floor even when a company is legally ordinary.

Letter grade F Malignant High confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1 Last reviewed May 6, 2026

Final Score -35* F - Malignant

FMALIGNANT-35 pts

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material17

Bonus+0

Cap35Ownership <= 2 and Governance <= 2

After Cap17

Penalties-52

!Not Verified

Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Evaluation Overview

F - Malignant

The score turns mainly on Labor Sovereignty, with the largest penalty coming from Ecological Harm.

Strengths

Labor Sovereignty3/7
Ownership2/10
Governance2/10

Penalties

Ecological Harm-25
High-Carbon Products-10
Reversibility-5
Human Harm-5

Evidence state

ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Linked claims16
Direct axis claims16
Coverage16/16

Scoring Axes

Axis	Score	Why this score
Ownership ? Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.	2 / 10	ExxonMobil is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. ExxonMobil is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. That keeps ExxonMobil low on Ownership: decisive control remains with shareholders, private owners, executives, or state insiders rather than affected people. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 78 scored entries below, 21 tied, 127 above on Ownership. Linked evidence ExxonMobil is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. [1]
Governance ? Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.	2 / 10	ExxonMobil is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 71 scored entries below, 22 tied, 133 above on Governance. Linked evidence context ExxonMobil is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. [1] context ExxonMobil filed litigation over shareholder climate proposals, demonstrating adversarial handling of climate accountability pressure. [2] ExxonMobil investor materials show shareholder-facing governance, while climate and shareholder-proposal disputes are handled through corporate and legal channels rather than affected-public control. [3]
Extraction ? Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.	2 / 10	ExxonMobil is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. ExxonMobil is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. That keeps ExxonMobil low on Extraction: the business model makes extraction from workers, users, suppliers, customers, or the public central rather than incidental. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 20 scored entries below, 18 tied, 188 above on Extraction. Linked evidence context ExxonMobil is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. [1] context ExxonMobil filed litigation over shareholder climate proposals, demonstrating adversarial handling of climate accountability pressure. [2] ExxonMobil’s fossil-fuel production model extracts and sells oil and gas whose lifecycle emissions and pollution costs are borne by the public and future populations. [4]
Labor Sovereignty ? Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.	3 / 7	ExxonMobil is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. ExxonMobil is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. That places ExxonMobil in the middle of Labor Sovereignty: workers or participants have some protection or agency, but not enough binding power to control the relationship. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 45 scored entries below, 66 tied, 115 above on Labor Sovereignty. Linked evidence context ExxonMobil is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. [1] context ExxonMobil filed litigation over shareholder climate proposals, demonstrating adversarial handling of climate accountability pressure. [2] ExxonMobil’s public record shows investor and executive control over fossil-energy strategy, not worker or community control over extraction, safety, and transition decisions. [5]
Solidarity with the Unemployed ? Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.	2 / 7	ExxonMobil is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. ExxonMobil is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. That keeps ExxonMobil low on Solidarity with the Unemployed: the model provides little protection for people who leave, are excluded, or cannot bargain from employment. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 31 scored entries below, 49 tied, 146 above on Solidarity with the Unemployed. Linked evidence context ExxonMobil is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. [1] context ExxonMobil filed litigation over shareholder climate proposals, demonstrating adversarial handling of climate accountability pressure. [2] ExxonMobil provides energy-sector employment and products but does not show structural solidarity with people outside the fossil economy who bear climate and pollution costs. [6]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity ? Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.	1 / 7	ExxonMobil is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. ExxonMobil is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. That keeps ExxonMobil low on Loss-Bearing Fidelity: losses, hazards, or adjustment costs are routinely pushed onto workers, customers, suppliers, communities, or the public. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 12 scored entries below, 20 tied, 194 above on Loss-Bearing Fidelity. Linked evidence context ExxonMobil is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. [1] context ExxonMobil filed litigation over shareholder climate proposals, demonstrating adversarial handling of climate accountability pressure. [2] ExxonMobil’s climate-accountability disputes and shareholder-proposal litigation show resistance to bearing transition and disclosure burdens demanded by outside stakeholders. [7]
Market Conduct ? Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.	2 / 5	ExxonMobil is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. ExxonMobil is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. That places ExxonMobil in the middle of Market Conduct: the product has real value but still uses meaningful lock-in, gatekeeping, market power, or dependency. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 31 scored entries below, 22 tied, 173 above on Market Conduct. Linked evidence context ExxonMobil is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. [1] context ExxonMobil filed litigation over shareholder climate proposals, demonstrating adversarial handling of climate accountability pressure. [2] ExxonMobil sells essential fuel products while contesting climate accountability pressure, making its market conduct dependent on externalized public costs. [8]
Product Integrity ? Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.	2 / 5	ExxonMobil is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. ExxonMobil is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. That places ExxonMobil in the middle of Product Integrity: the product has real use value but is compromised by incentives, monetization, lock-in, quality degradation, or risk. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 23 scored entries below, 13 tied, 190 above on Product Integrity. Linked evidence context ExxonMobil is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. [1] context ExxonMobil filed litigation over shareholder climate proposals, demonstrating adversarial handling of climate accountability pressure. [2] ExxonMobil’s products have real energy utility but are fossil fuels with lifecycle emissions and pollution harms, sharply limiting product-integrity credit. [9]
Scale Integrity ? Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.	1 / 5	ExxonMobil is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 14 scored entries below, 16 tied, 196 above on Scale Integrity. Linked evidence context ExxonMobil is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. [1] context ExxonMobil filed litigation over shareholder climate proposals, demonstrating adversarial handling of climate accountability pressure. [2] ExxonMobil’s scale makes fossil-fuel emissions and climate-risk contribution systemic rather than an isolated product defect. [10]

Penalties

Penalty	Applied	Why this penalty
Reversibility ? Applied when positive conduct depends on current living leaders, founders, family owners, or other person-contingent governance rather than durable structure. Range: -5 to 0.	-5	ExxonMobil's favorable conduct depends partly on current leaders, founders, family owners, executive discretion, or other person-contingent control rather than a fully locked democratic stakeholder-control structure. ExxonMobil's favorable conduct depends partly on current leaders, founders, family owners, executive discretion, or other person-contingent control rather than a fully locked democratic stakeholder-control structure. That warrants a severe Reversibility penalty because favorable conduct depends on current people or discretionary leadership rather than locked stakeholder structure. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 0 scored entries below, 95 tied, 131 above on Reversibility. Linked evidence context ExxonMobil is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures. [1] ExxonMobil's favorable conduct depends partly on current leaders, founders, family owners, executive discretion, or other person-contingent control rather than a fully locked democratic stakeholder-control structure. [11]
Human Harm ? Severity, scale, culpability, vulnerable targets, willful reoffense, reputation laundering, pattern escalation, and time decay. Range: -20 to 0.	-5	ExxonMobil fossil-fuel production creates human-harm exposure through climate and air-pollution pathways; the penalty is below the worst-actor tier because this record is modeled contribution rather than a single adjudicated mass-injury event. ExxonMobil fossil-fuel production creates human-harm exposure through climate and air-pollution pathways; the penalty is below the worst-actor tier because this record is modeled contribution rather than a single adjudicated mass-injury event. That warrants a limited Human Harm penalty because ordinary operation, documented misconduct, or institutional power creates serious injury, deprivation, abuse, or foreseeable human damage. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 41 scored entries below, 6 tied, 179 above on Human Harm. Linked evidence ExxonMobil fossil-fuel production creates human-harm exposure through climate and air-pollution pathways; the penalty is below the worst-actor tier because this record is modeled contribution rather than a single adjudicated mass-injury event. [12]
Ecological Harm ? Footprint, trajectory, irreversibility, culpability, and scale, including whether ecological harm is central to the model and continued after credible notice. Range: -30 to 0.	-25	ExxonMobil sits in the worst-actor Ecological Harm tier because fossil extraction and downstream Scope 3 emissions are central to the business model at global scale. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 0 scored entries below, 4 tied, 222 above on Ecological Harm. Linked evidence ExxonMobil's business model includes fossil-fuel production whose Scope 3 emissions dominate lifecycle climate footprint. [13]
High-Carbon Products ? Core products, services, financing, or supply chains that materially depend on fossil-fuel combustion, high-emissions transport, industrial animal agriculture, meat, dairy, or other unusually carbon-intensive activity. This is scored separately from general ecological harm so ordinary consumers can see carbon-intensive product exposure directly. Range: -10 to 0.	-10	Worst-tier high-carbon exposure is warranted because fossil-fuel extraction, refining, marketing, or fossil-fuel industry advocacy depends directly on large-scale carbon combustion. Linked evidence ExxonMobil has fossil-fuel core high-carbon product exposure based on its listed business model and current profile description: A public oil and gas major whose core products drive climate and ecological harm, with a history of resisting shareholder climate pressure. ExxonMobil scores low because of ecological harm, documented human harm, and pe… [16]
Toxic Products ? Current sale of products whose ordinary use, exposure, ingredients, residues, packaging, or formulation creates toxic, addictive, or consumer-safety risk. Food products receive at least light scrutiny for artificial colors, artificial flavors, petro-derived additives, pesticide residues, contaminants, endocrine-disrupting packaging, and ultra-processed formulation. Ordinary adult nightlife or alcohol service is not penalized by itself without evidence of predatory marketing, youth targeting, addiction-extractive design, or unusual product-safety misconduct. Range: -5 to 0.	-4	ExxonMobil currently sells oil, gas, fuels, and related fossil-energy products as a core business; the product category creates ordinary toxic, addictive, or consumer-safety exposure under the directory's toxic-products screen. ExxonMobil currently sells oil, gas, fuels, and related fossil-energy products as a core business; the product category creates ordinary toxic, addictive, or consumer-safety exposure under the directory's toxic-products screen. That warrants a severe Toxic Products penalty because ordinary use, exposure, ingredients, residues, packaging, or formulation creates material toxic, addictive, or consumer-safety risk. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 2 scored entries below, 6 tied, 218 above on Toxic Products. Linked evidence ExxonMobil currently sells oil, gas, fuels, and related fossil-energy products as a core business; the product category creates ordinary toxic, addictive, or consumer-safety exposure under the directory's toxic-products screen. [14]
Accountability Opacity ? Material opacity, reputation laundering, or hidden accountability structures that prevent public accountability. Range: -2 to 0.	-2	ExxonMobil filed litigation over shareholder climate proposals, demonstrating adversarial handling of climate accountability pressure. ExxonMobil filed litigation over shareholder climate proposals, demonstrating adversarial handling of climate accountability pressure. That warrants a severe Accountability Opacity penalty because material facts, risks, conflicts, ownership, or accountability information are obscured from the public. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 0 scored entries below, 52 tied, 174 above on Accountability Opacity. Linked evidence ExxonMobil filed litigation over shareholder climate proposals, demonstrating adversarial handling of climate accountability pressure. [2]
Ideological Disavowal ? Concealed ideology presented as neutrality, expertise, professional necessity, public-service administration, market inevitability, or non-ideological common sense while exercising power. Range: -3 to 0.	-1	ExxonMobil's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because ExxonMobil shows bounded neutrality theater: some contested choices are softened through expertise,… ExxonMobil's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because ExxonMobil shows bounded neutrality theater: some contested choices are softened through expertise, public-interest, professional, market, safety, or institutional language, but the record does not show dominant concealment of standpoint. That warrants a limited Ideological Disavowal penalty because the institution presents situated, contested choices as neutrality, expertise, inevitability, safety, or common sense. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Ideological Disavowal 0 to -3 recalibration: 0 for explicit standpoint or no penalty-level neutrality theater; -1 for bounded softening of contested choices; -2 for strong neutrality theater by a powerful institution; -3 for major gatekeeping or coercive power presented as neutral, necessary, objective, or non-ideological. Uncertainty This recalibration uses public self-presentation and profile evidence; later review should add direct language-analysis evidence for high-impact institutions. Linked evidence ExxonMobil's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because ExxonMobil shows bounded neutrality theater: some contested choices are softened through expertise, public-interest, professional, market, safety, or institutional language, but the record does not show dominant concealment of standpoint. [15]

Bonus Credits

No bonus credits applied in this version.

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

High 80/100

16 verified linked claims 16 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 16/16 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 14/20

16 verified linked claims

Source quality 13/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 14/18

16 direct claims across 16 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 10/10

16/16 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending

VerificationUnverified

ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)

ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)

Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.

Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

1ExxonMobil is a publicly traded corporation governed through shareholder-facing investor and board structures.

Ownership Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 4, 2026

ExxonMobil investor relationsOfficial self-description · 68%

2ExxonMobil filed litigation over shareholder climate proposals, demonstrating adversarial handling of climate accountability pressure.

Accountability Opacity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 4, 2026

ExxonMobil 2024 shareholder proposal statementGeneral web source · 58%

3ExxonMobil investor materials show shareholder-facing governance, while climate and shareholder-proposal disputes are handled through corporate and legal channels rather than affected-public control.

Governance Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

ExxonMobil investor relationsOfficial self-description · 68%
ExxonMobil portfolio life-cycle emissionsGeneral web source · 58%
ExxonMobil shareholder proposal statementGeneral web source · 58%

4ExxonMobil’s fossil-fuel production model extracts and sells oil and gas whose lifecycle emissions and pollution costs are borne by the public and future populations.

Extraction Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

ExxonMobil investor relationsOfficial self-description · 68%
ExxonMobil portfolio life-cycle emissionsGeneral web source · 58%
ExxonMobil shareholder proposal statementGeneral web source · 58%

5ExxonMobil’s public record shows investor and executive control over fossil-energy strategy, not worker or community control over extraction, safety, and transition decisions.

Labor Sovereignty Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

ExxonMobil investor relationsOfficial self-description · 68%
ExxonMobil portfolio life-cycle emissionsGeneral web source · 58%
ExxonMobil shareholder proposal statementGeneral web source · 58%

6ExxonMobil provides energy-sector employment and products but does not show structural solidarity with people outside the fossil economy who bear climate and pollution costs.

Solidarity Unemployed Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

ExxonMobil investor relationsOfficial self-description · 68%
ExxonMobil portfolio life-cycle emissionsGeneral web source · 58%
ExxonMobil shareholder proposal statementGeneral web source · 58%

7ExxonMobil’s climate-accountability disputes and shareholder-proposal litigation show resistance to bearing transition and disclosure burdens demanded by outside stakeholders.

Loss Bearing Fidelity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

ExxonMobil investor relationsOfficial self-description · 68%
ExxonMobil portfolio life-cycle emissionsGeneral web source · 58%
ExxonMobil shareholder proposal statementGeneral web source · 58%

8ExxonMobil sells essential fuel products while contesting climate accountability pressure, making its market conduct dependent on externalized public costs.

Market Conduct Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

ExxonMobil investor relationsOfficial self-description · 68%
ExxonMobil portfolio life-cycle emissionsGeneral web source · 58%
ExxonMobil shareholder proposal statementGeneral web source · 58%

9ExxonMobil’s products have real energy utility but are fossil fuels with lifecycle emissions and pollution harms, sharply limiting product-integrity credit.

Product Integrity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

ExxonMobil investor relationsOfficial self-description · 68%
ExxonMobil portfolio life-cycle emissionsGeneral web source · 58%
ExxonMobil shareholder proposal statementGeneral web source · 58%

10ExxonMobil’s scale makes fossil-fuel emissions and climate-risk contribution systemic rather than an isolated product defect.

Scale Integrity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

ExxonMobil investor relationsOfficial self-description · 68%
ExxonMobil portfolio life-cycle emissionsGeneral web source · 58%
ExxonMobil shareholder proposal statementGeneral web source · 58%

11ExxonMobil's favorable conduct depends partly on current leaders, founders, family owners, executive discretion, or other person-contingent control rather than a fully locked democratic stakeholder-control structure.

Reversibility Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 5, 2026

ExxonMobil investor relationsOfficial self-description · 68%

12ExxonMobil fossil-fuel production creates human-harm exposure through climate and air-pollution pathways; the penalty is below the worst-actor tier because this record is modeled contribution rather than a single adjudicated mass-injury event.

Human Harm Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 5, 2026

ExxonMobil portfolio life-cycle emissionsGeneral web source · 58%
WHO air pollution and healthPrimary public record · 100%

13ExxonMobil's business model includes fossil-fuel production whose Scope 3 emissions dominate lifecycle climate footprint.

Ecological Harm Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 4, 2026

ExxonMobil portfolio life-cycle emissionsGeneral web source · 58%

14ExxonMobil currently sells oil, gas, fuels, and related fossil-energy products as a core business; the product category creates ordinary toxic, addictive, or consumer-safety exposure under the directory's toxic-products screen.

Toxic Products Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 6, 2026

AI scaffold

ExxonMobil investor relationsOfficial self-description · 68%
WHO ambient air pollution and healthPrimary public record · 100%

15ExxonMobil's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because ExxonMobil shows bounded neutrality theater: some contested choices are softened through expertise, public-interest, professional, market, safety, or institutional language, but the record does not show dominant concealment of standpoint.

Ideological Disavowal Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 9, 2026

AI scaffold

ExxonMobil official siteGeneral web source · 58%
ExxonMobil investor relationsOfficial self-description · 68%
ExxonMobil 2024 shareholder proposal statementGeneral web source · 58%

16ExxonMobil has fossil-fuel core high-carbon product exposure based on its listed business model and current profile description: A public oil and gas major whose core products drive climate and ecological harm, with a history of resisting shareholder climate pressure. ExxonMobil scores low because of ecological harm, documented human harm, and pe…

High Carbon Products Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 11, 2026

ExxonMobil public siteGeneral web source · 58%
EIA: Gasoline and the environmentPrimary public record · 100%
EPA: Transportation Sector EmissionsPrimary public record · 100%

Alternatives

AGOOD53 Namaste Solar employee-owned solar company · same market AGOOD52 South Mountain Company employee-owned design/build company · same market

Competitors

AGOOD53 Namaste Solar employee-owned solar company · same market AGOOD52 South Mountain Company employee-owned design/build company · same market FMALIGNANT-53 Chevron public company · same market FMALIGNANT-50 Shell public company · United Kingdom FMALIGNANT-57 BP public company · United Kingdom

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for ExxonMobil Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

May 6, 2026 at 12:00 AM UTC ai-scaffolding toxic-products-assessment

Added tentative AI-generated Toxic Products penalty -4 and directory value for current toxic, addictive, pesticide, livestock, chemical, or consumer-safety product exposure.

May 5, 2026 at 12:00 AM UTC ai_scaffolding score

Published tentative AI-generated scaffolding score -10 for initial human review under gcd-rubric-v1.

View Full Audit Log