public company

Shell

Industry Energy

A public oil and gas major whose core fossil-fuel business creates severe climate and ecological harm despite transition messaging. Shell scores low because of ecological harm, person-dependent governance, and documented human harm, with extractive economics and centralized governance reinforcing the negative evaluation.

Why this matters: When ecological harm is core to the business model, harm sets the floor below ordinary material scoring.

Letter grade F Malignant Medium confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1 Last reviewed May 6, 2026

Final Score -50* F - Malignant

FMALIGNANT-50 pts

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material14

Bonus+0

Cap35Ownership <= 2 and Governance <= 2

After Cap14

Penalties-64

Private Government badge

Shell receives the Private Government badge because it combines large-scale private rule-setting over customers, workers, users, members, or counterparties with OpenLobby-documented lobbying of about $58.7M on public policy issues.

Evidence: [18]

Policy Capture: L for Lobbying

The L badge appears when the Policy Capture penalty is severe. Here, L stands for Lobbying: the policy-capture value is -14, meaning the evidence indicates major private-interest lobbying or policy pressure against workers, customers, citizens, affected communities, democratic accountability, or ecological life.

Evidence: [16]

!Not Verified

Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Evaluation Overview

F - Malignant

The score turns mainly on Labor Sovereignty, with the largest penalty coming from Ecological Harm.

Strengths

Labor Sovereignty3/7
Solidarity with the Unemployed2/7
Market Conduct2/5

Penalties

Ecological Harm-24
Policy Capture-14
High-Carbon Products-10
Reversibility-5

Evidence state

ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Linked claims18
Direct axis claims17
Coverage17/17

Scoring Axes

Axis	Score	Why this score
Ownership ? Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.	1 / 10	Shell publishes investor-relations materials for a shareholder-governed public company. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 12 scored entries below, 65 tied, 149 above on Ownership. Linked evidence Shell publishes investor-relations materials for a shareholder-governed public company. [1]
Governance ? Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.	1 / 10	Shell publishes investor-relations materials for a shareholder-governed public company. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 2 scored entries below, 68 tied, 156 above on Governance. Linked evidence context Shell publishes investor-relations materials for a shareholder-governed public company. [1] context Shell public materials describe the Milieudefensie climate case and the 2024 Court of Appeal decision concerning Shell emissions obligations. [2] Shell investor materials show shareholder-facing governance, while climate-accountability disputes are addressed through litigation and executive strategy rather than affected-community control. [3]
Extraction ? Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.	1 / 10	Shell publishes investor-relations materials for a shareholder-governed public company. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 2 scored entries below, 17 tied, 207 above on Extraction. Linked evidence context Shell publishes investor-relations materials for a shareholder-governed public company. [1] context Shell public materials describe the Milieudefensie climate case and the 2024 Court of Appeal decision concerning Shell emissions obligations. [2] Shell’s core oil and gas business extracts fossil resources and sells high-carbon products, creating private revenue from products whose climate and pollution costs are borne broadly. [4]
Labor Sovereignty ? Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.	3 / 7	Shell publishes investor-relations materials for a shareholder-governed public company. Shell publishes investor-relations materials for a shareholder-governed public company. That places Shell in the middle of Labor Sovereignty: workers or participants have some protection or agency, but not enough binding power to control the relationship. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 45 scored entries below, 66 tied, 115 above on Labor Sovereignty. Linked evidence context Shell publishes investor-relations materials for a shareholder-governed public company. [1] context Shell public materials describe the Milieudefensie climate case and the 2024 Court of Appeal decision concerning Shell emissions obligations. [2] Shell’s public record centers investor governance and fossil-energy operations, without evidence that workers or affected communities can control the company’s core extraction and transition decisions. [5]
Solidarity with the Unemployed ? Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.	2 / 7	Shell publishes investor-relations materials for a shareholder-governed public company. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 31 scored entries below, 49 tied, 146 above on Solidarity with the Unemployed. Linked evidence context Shell publishes investor-relations materials for a shareholder-governed public company. [1] context Shell public materials describe the Milieudefensie climate case and the 2024 Court of Appeal decision concerning Shell emissions obligations. [2] Shell provides energy products and employment, but fossil-fuel dependence and climate litigation do not show structural solidarity with people harmed by energy transition, pollution, or climate risk. [6]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity ? Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.	1 / 7	Shell publishes investor-relations materials for a shareholder-governed public company. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 12 scored entries below, 20 tied, 194 above on Loss-Bearing Fidelity. Linked evidence context Shell publishes investor-relations materials for a shareholder-governed public company. [1] context Shell public materials describe the Milieudefensie climate case and the 2024 Court of Appeal decision concerning Shell emissions obligations. [2] Shell climate litigation and emissions disputes show that major social and ecological costs are contested externally rather than reliably absorbed by the company as obligations. [7]
Market Conduct ? Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.	2 / 5	Shell publishes investor-relations materials for a shareholder-governed public company. Shell publishes investor-relations materials for a shareholder-governed public company. That places Shell in the middle of Market Conduct: the product has real value but still uses meaningful lock-in, gatekeeping, market power, or dependency. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 31 scored entries below, 22 tied, 173 above on Market Conduct. Linked evidence context Shell publishes investor-relations materials for a shareholder-governed public company. [1] context Shell public materials describe the Milieudefensie climate case and the 2024 Court of Appeal decision concerning Shell emissions obligations. [2] Shell sells essential energy in fuel markets while lobbying and litigating over climate obligations, making market conduct inseparable from private control over public climate costs. [8]
Product Integrity ? Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.	2 / 5	Shell publishes investor-relations materials for a shareholder-governed public company. Shell publishes investor-relations materials for a shareholder-governed public company. That places Shell in the middle of Product Integrity: the product has real use value but is compromised by incentives, monetization, lock-in, quality degradation, or risk. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 23 scored entries below, 13 tied, 190 above on Product Integrity. Linked evidence context Shell publishes investor-relations materials for a shareholder-governed public company. [1] context Shell public materials describe the Milieudefensie climate case and the 2024 Court of Appeal decision concerning Shell emissions obligations. [2] Shell’s core products move vehicles and industry but are fossil fuels with direct toxic, air-pollution, and climate consequences, so utility is bound to severe product harm. [9]
Scale Integrity ? Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.	1 / 5	Shell publishes investor-relations materials for a shareholder-governed public company. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 14 scored entries below, 16 tied, 196 above on Scale Integrity. Linked evidence context Shell publishes investor-relations materials for a shareholder-governed public company. [1] context Shell public materials describe the Milieudefensie climate case and the 2024 Court of Appeal decision concerning Shell emissions obligations. [2] Shell’s multinational fossil-fuel scale magnifies climate, pollution, lobbying, and transition risks beyond what ordinary consumer choice can discipline. [10]

Penalties

Penalty	Applied	Why this penalty
Reversibility ? Applied when positive conduct depends on current living leaders, founders, family owners, or other person-contingent governance rather than durable structure. Range: -5 to 0.	-5	Shell's favorable conduct depends partly on current leaders, founders, family owners, executive discretion, or other person-contingent control rather than a fully locked democratic stakeholder-control structure. Shell's favorable conduct depends partly on current leaders, founders, family owners, executive discretion, or other person-contingent control rather than a fully locked democratic stakeholder-control structure. That warrants a severe Reversibility penalty because favorable conduct depends on current people or discretionary leadership rather than locked stakeholder structure. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 0 scored entries below, 95 tied, 131 above on Reversibility. Linked evidence context Shell publishes investor-relations materials for a shareholder-governed public company. [1] Shell's favorable conduct depends partly on current leaders, founders, family owners, executive discretion, or other person-contingent control rather than a fully locked democratic stakeholder-control structure. [11]
Human Harm ? Severity, scale, culpability, vulnerable targets, willful reoffense, reputation laundering, pattern escalation, and time decay. Range: -20 to 0.	-4	Shell's climate-case materials make human-harm scoring inseparable from climate-risk contribution, even when litigation outcomes address emissions obligations rather than a single direct injury event. Shell's climate-case materials make human-harm scoring inseparable from climate-risk contribution, even when litigation outcomes address emissions obligations rather than a single direct injury event. That warrants a limited Human Harm penalty because ordinary operation, documented misconduct, or institutional power creates serious injury, deprivation, abuse, or foreseeable human damage. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 48 scored entries below, 3 tied, 175 above on Human Harm. Linked evidence context Shell public materials describe the Milieudefensie climate case and the 2024 Court of Appeal decision concerning Shell emissions obligations. [2] Shell's climate-case materials make human-harm scoring inseparable from climate-risk contribution, even when litigation outcomes address emissions obligations rather than a single direct injury event. [12]
Ecological Harm ? Footprint, trajectory, irreversibility, culpability, and scale, including whether ecological harm is central to the model and continued after credible notice. Range: -30 to 0.	-24	Shell sits in the worst-actor Ecological Harm tier because fossil extraction, refining, and marketing keep climate-forcing harm central to the business model despite years of public notice and litigation. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 0 scored entries below, 4 tied, 222 above on Ecological Harm. Linked evidence Shell public materials describe the Milieudefensie climate case and the 2024 Court of Appeal decision concerning Shell emissions obligations. [2]
Policy Capture ? Private-interest attempts to bend law, regulation, subsidies, taxes, enforcement, trade, labor, safety, competition, environmental, healthcare, housing, surveillance, civil-liberties, or consumer policy against workers, customers, citizens, affected communities, or ecological life. Public-interest advocacy is not penalized merely because it is lobbying. Range: -15 to 0.	-14	OpenLobby records SHELL USA, INC. (FKA SHELL OIL COMPANY) lobbying on natural resources, chemicals, fuels, trade, marine, transportation, and other issues with about $58.7M in spending… OpenLobby records SHELL USA, INC. (FKA SHELL OIL COMPANY) lobbying on natural resources, chemicals, fuels, trade, marine, transportation, and other issues with about $58.7M in spending across 33 filings; the reviewed filings document private institutional lobbying over public rules rather than a public-interest advocacy role. That warrants a severe Policy Capture penalty because private institutional pressure is being applied to public rules while affected people cannot democratically govern that agenda. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Linked evidence OpenLobby records SHELL USA, INC. (FKA SHELL OIL COMPANY) lobbying on natural resources, chemicals, fuels, trade, marine, transportation, and other issues with about $58.7M in spending across 33 filings; the reviewed filings document private institutional lobbying over public rules rather than a public-interest advocacy role. [16]
High-Carbon Products ? Core products, services, financing, or supply chains that materially depend on fossil-fuel combustion, high-emissions transport, industrial animal agriculture, meat, dairy, or other unusually carbon-intensive activity. This is scored separately from general ecological harm so ordinary consumers can see carbon-intensive product exposure directly. Range: -10 to 0.	-10	Worst-tier high-carbon exposure is warranted because fossil-fuel extraction, refining, marketing, or fossil-fuel industry advocacy depends directly on large-scale carbon combustion. Linked evidence Shell has fossil-fuel core high-carbon product exposure based on its listed business model and current profile description: A public oil and gas major whose core fossil-fuel business creates severe climate and ecological harm despite transition messaging. Shell scores low because of ecological harm, person-dependent governance, and documente… [17]
Toxic Products ? Current sale of products whose ordinary use, exposure, ingredients, residues, packaging, or formulation creates toxic, addictive, or consumer-safety risk. Food products receive at least light scrutiny for artificial colors, artificial flavors, petro-derived additives, pesticide residues, contaminants, endocrine-disrupting packaging, and ultra-processed formulation. Ordinary adult nightlife or alcohol service is not penalized by itself without evidence of predatory marketing, youth targeting, addiction-extractive design, or unusual product-safety misconduct. Range: -5 to 0.	-4	Shell currently sells oil, gas, fuels, and related fossil-energy products as a core business; the product category creates ordinary toxic, addictive, or consumer-safety exposure under the directory's toxic-products screen. Shell currently sells oil, gas, fuels, and related fossil-energy products as a core business; the product category creates ordinary toxic, addictive, or consumer-safety exposure under the directory's toxic-products screen. That warrants a severe Toxic Products penalty because ordinary use, exposure, ingredients, residues, packaging, or formulation creates material toxic, addictive, or consumer-safety risk. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 2 scored entries below, 6 tied, 218 above on Toxic Products. Linked evidence Shell currently sells oil, gas, fuels, and related fossil-energy products as a core business; the product category creates ordinary toxic, addictive, or consumer-safety exposure under the directory's toxic-products screen. [14]
Accountability Opacity ? Material opacity, reputation laundering, or hidden accountability structures that prevent public accountability. Range: -2 to 0.	-2	Shell's climate-accountability litigation creates a accountability-opacity penalty because public assessment of emissions obligations depends on adversarial legal proceedings and contested company climate representations. Shell's climate-accountability litigation creates a accountability-opacity penalty because public assessment of emissions obligations depends on adversarial legal proceedings and contested company climate representations. That warrants a severe Accountability Opacity penalty because material facts, risks, conflicts, ownership, or accountability information are obscured from the public. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Column-spectrum position: 0 scored entries below, 52 tied, 174 above on Accountability Opacity. Linked evidence Shell's climate-accountability litigation creates a accountability-opacity penalty because public assessment of emissions obligations depends on adversarial legal proceedings and contested company climate representations. [13]
Ideological Disavowal ? Concealed ideology presented as neutrality, expertise, professional necessity, public-service administration, market inevitability, or non-ideological common sense while exercising power. Range: -3 to 0.	-1	Shell's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Shell shows bounded neutrality theater: some contested choices are softened through expertise, public-interest,… Shell's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Shell shows bounded neutrality theater: some contested choices are softened through expertise, public-interest, professional, market, safety, or institutional language, but the record does not show dominant concealment of standpoint. That warrants a limited Ideological Disavowal penalty because the institution presents situated, contested choices as neutrality, expertise, inevitability, safety, or common sense. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Ideological Disavowal 0 to -3 recalibration: 0 for explicit standpoint or no penalty-level neutrality theater; -1 for bounded softening of contested choices; -2 for strong neutrality theater by a powerful institution; -3 for major gatekeeping or coercive power presented as neutral, necessary, objective, or non-ideological. Uncertainty This recalibration uses public self-presentation and profile evidence; later review should add direct language-analysis evidence for high-impact institutions. Linked evidence Shell's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Shell shows bounded neutrality theater: some contested choices are softened through expertise, public-interest, professional, market, safety, or institutional language, but the record does not show dominant concealment of standpoint. [15]

Bonus Credits

No bonus credits applied in this version.

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

Medium 79/100

17 verified linked claims 17 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 17/17 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 14/20

17 verified linked claims

Source quality 12/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 14/18

17 direct claims across 17 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 10/10

17/17 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending

VerificationUnverified

ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)

ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)

Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.

Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

1Shell publishes investor-relations materials for a shareholder-governed public company.

Ownership Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 5, 2026

AI scaffold

Shell investorsOfficial self-description · 68%

2Shell public materials describe the Milieudefensie climate case and the 2024 Court of Appeal decision concerning Shell emissions obligations.

Ecological Harm Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 5, 2026

AI scaffold

Shell climate caseGeneral web source · 58%

3Shell investor materials show shareholder-facing governance, while climate-accountability disputes are addressed through litigation and executive strategy rather than affected-community control.

Governance Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Shell investorsOfficial self-description · 68%
Shell climate caseGeneral web source · 58%
Shell public siteGeneral web source · 58%

4Shell’s core oil and gas business extracts fossil resources and sells high-carbon products, creating private revenue from products whose climate and pollution costs are borne broadly.

Extraction Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Shell investorsOfficial self-description · 68%
Shell climate caseGeneral web source · 58%
Shell public siteGeneral web source · 58%

5Shell’s public record centers investor governance and fossil-energy operations, without evidence that workers or affected communities can control the company’s core extraction and transition decisions.

Labor Sovereignty Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Shell investorsOfficial self-description · 68%
Shell climate caseGeneral web source · 58%
Shell public siteGeneral web source · 58%

6Shell provides energy products and employment, but fossil-fuel dependence and climate litigation do not show structural solidarity with people harmed by energy transition, pollution, or climate risk.

Solidarity Unemployed Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Shell investorsOfficial self-description · 68%
Shell climate caseGeneral web source · 58%
Shell public siteGeneral web source · 58%

7Shell climate litigation and emissions disputes show that major social and ecological costs are contested externally rather than reliably absorbed by the company as obligations.

Loss Bearing Fidelity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Shell investorsOfficial self-description · 68%
Shell climate caseGeneral web source · 58%
Shell public siteGeneral web source · 58%

8Shell sells essential energy in fuel markets while lobbying and litigating over climate obligations, making market conduct inseparable from private control over public climate costs.

Market Conduct Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Shell investorsOfficial self-description · 68%
Shell climate caseGeneral web source · 58%
Shell public siteGeneral web source · 58%

9Shell’s core products move vehicles and industry but are fossil fuels with direct toxic, air-pollution, and climate consequences, so utility is bound to severe product harm.

Product Integrity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Shell investorsOfficial self-description · 68%
Shell climate caseGeneral web source · 58%
Shell public siteGeneral web source · 58%

10Shell’s multinational fossil-fuel scale magnifies climate, pollution, lobbying, and transition risks beyond what ordinary consumer choice can discipline.

Scale Integrity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Shell investorsOfficial self-description · 68%
Shell climate caseGeneral web source · 58%
Shell public siteGeneral web source · 58%

11Shell's favorable conduct depends partly on current leaders, founders, family owners, executive discretion, or other person-contingent control rather than a fully locked democratic stakeholder-control structure.

Reversibility Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 5, 2026

Shell investorsOfficial self-description · 68%

12Shell's climate-case materials make human-harm scoring inseparable from climate-risk contribution, even when litigation outcomes address emissions obligations rather than a single direct injury event.

Human Harm Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 5, 2026

Shell climate case materialsGeneral web source · 58%

13Shell's climate-accountability litigation creates a accountability-opacity penalty because public assessment of emissions obligations depends on adversarial legal proceedings and contested company climate representations.

Accountability Opacity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 5, 2026

Shell climate caseGeneral web source · 58%

14Shell currently sells oil, gas, fuels, and related fossil-energy products as a core business; the product category creates ordinary toxic, addictive, or consumer-safety exposure under the directory's toxic-products screen.

Toxic Products Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 6, 2026

AI scaffold

Shell investorsOfficial self-description · 68%
WHO ambient air pollution and healthPrimary public record · 100%

15Shell's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Shell shows bounded neutrality theater: some contested choices are softened through expertise, public-interest, professional, market, safety, or institutional language, but the record does not show dominant concealment of standpoint.

Ideological Disavowal Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 9, 2026

AI scaffold

Shell official siteGeneral web source · 58%
Shell investorsOfficial self-description · 68%
Shell climate caseGeneral web source · 58%

16OpenLobby records SHELL USA, INC. (FKA SHELL OIL COMPANY) lobbying on natural resources, chemicals, fuels, trade, marine, transportation, and other issues with about $58.7M in spending across 33 filings; the reviewed filings document private institutional lobbying over public rules rather than a public-interest advocacy role.

Policy Capture Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

OpenLobby — SHELL USA, INC. (FKA SHELL OIL COMPANY) lobbying profileGeneral web source · 58%

17Shell has fossil-fuel core high-carbon product exposure based on its listed business model and current profile description: A public oil and gas major whose core fossil-fuel business creates severe climate and ecological harm despite transition messaging. Shell scores low because of ecological harm, person-dependent governance, and documente…

High Carbon Products Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 11, 2026

Shell public siteGeneral web source · 58%
EIA: Gasoline and the environmentPrimary public record · 100%
EPA: Transportation Sector EmissionsPrimary public record · 100%

18Shell receives the Private Government badge because it combines large-scale private rule-setting over customers, workers, users, members, or counterparties with OpenLobby-documented lobbying of about $58.7M on public policy issues.

Private Government Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

OpenLobby — SHELL USA, INC. (FKA SHELL OIL COMPANY) lobbying profileGeneral web source · 58%

Alternatives

AGOOD53 Namaste Solar employee-owned solar company · United States AGOOD52 South Mountain Company employee-owned design/build company · United States

Competitors

FMALIGNANT-57 BP public company · same market AGOOD53 Namaste Solar employee-owned solar company · United States AGOOD52 South Mountain Company employee-owned design/build company · United States FMALIGNANT-35 ExxonMobil public company · United States FMALIGNANT-53 Chevron public company · United States

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for Shell Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

May 6, 2026 at 12:00 AM UTC ai-scaffolding toxic-products-assessment

Added tentative AI-generated Toxic Products penalty -4 and directory value for current toxic, addictive, pesticide, livestock, chemical, or consumer-safety product exposure.

May 5, 2026 at 12:00 AM UTC ai_scaffolding score

Published tentative AI-generated scaffolding score -12 for initial human review under gcd-rubric-v1.

View Full Audit Log