citrus grower cooperative
Florida's Natural Growers
Industry Food
A Florida citrus grower cooperative selling orange juice, grapefruit juice, lemonade, and related refrigerated grocery beverages. Florida's Natural Growers scores well because ownership is comparatively aligned and governance has stronger accountability than peers, though toxic or materially harmful products and ecological harm still limits the evaluation.
Why this matters: Florida’s Natural is structurally better than investor-owned juice brands because growers own the cooperative, but juice sugar and monocrop agriculture keep it only qualified-good.
Letter grade C Performative Medium confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1
* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.
Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.
Evaluation Overview
C - Performative
The score turns mainly on Ownership, with the largest penalty coming from Toxic Products.
Strengths
- Ownership7/10
- Governance6/10
- Extraction6/10
Penalties
- Toxic Products-2
- Ecological Harm-1
- High-Carbon Products-1
Evidence state
- ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)
- ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
- Linked claims5
- Direct axis claims5
- Coverage5/12
Scoring Axes
| Axis | Score | Why this score |
|---|---|---|
Ownership
?
Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control
at 10.
|
7 / 10 |
The linked record identifies Florida's Natural as a cooperative of Florida citrus growers rather than a shareholder-owned juice company. Linked evidence
|
Governance
?
Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic
stakeholder control at 10.
|
6 / 10 |
The linked record identifies Florida's Natural as a cooperative of Florida citrus growers rather than a shareholder-owned juice company. Linked evidence
|
Extraction
?
Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured
extraction judgment.
|
6 / 10 |
The linked record identifies Florida's Natural as a cooperative of Florida citrus growers rather than a shareholder-owned juice company. Linked evidence
|
Labor Sovereignty
?
Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at
7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence
shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling,
retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of
worker voice, or extreme turnover.
|
4 / 7 |
The linked record identifies Florida's Natural as a cooperative of Florida citrus growers rather than a shareholder-owned juice company. Linked evidence
|
Solidarity with the
Unemployed
?
Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment,
and non-competes.
|
4 / 7 |
The linked record identifies Florida's Natural as a cooperative of Florida citrus growers rather than a shareholder-owned juice company. Linked evidence
|
Loss-Bearing Fidelity
?
Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and
public obligations.
|
5 / 7 |
The linked record identifies Florida's Natural as a cooperative of Florida citrus growers rather than a shareholder-owned juice company. Linked evidence
|
Market Conduct
?
Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.
|
4 / 5 |
Florida's Natural sells refrigerated orange juice and related citrus beverages through grocery channels, preserving some fruit value while converting whole fruit into drinkable sugar exposure. Linked evidence
|
Product Integrity
?
Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.
|
4 / 5 |
Florida's Natural sells refrigerated orange juice and related citrus beverages through grocery channels, preserving some fruit value while converting whole fruit into drinkable sugar exposure. Linked evidence
|
Scale Integrity
?
Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.
|
5 / 5 |
The linked record identifies Florida's Natural as a cooperative of Florida citrus growers rather than a shareholder-owned juice company. Linked evidence
|
Penalties
| Penalty | Applied | Why this penalty |
|---|---|---|
Ecological Harm
?
Footprint, trajectory, irreversibility, culpability, and scale,
including whether ecological harm is central to the model and continued
after credible notice. Range: -30 to 0.
|
-1 |
Florida citrus production and juice processing carry land, water, disease-management, and agricultural-input burdens, describes conduct considered under Ecological Harm. Linked evidence
|
High-Carbon Products
?
Core products, services, financing, or supply chains that materially
depend on fossil-fuel combustion, high-emissions transport, industrial
animal agriculture, meat, dairy, or other unusually carbon-intensive
activity. This is scored separately from general ecological harm so
ordinary consumers can see carbon-intensive product exposure directly.
Range: -10 to 0.
|
-1 |
The product category is food and agriculture, but the profile centers staples, produce, grains, beverages, or baked goods rather than meat or dairy. Linked evidence
|
Toxic Products
?
Current sale of products whose ordinary use, exposure, ingredients,
residues, packaging, or formulation creates toxic, addictive, or
consumer-safety risk. Food products receive at least light scrutiny for
artificial colors, artificial flavors, petro-derived additives,
pesticide residues, contaminants, endocrine-disrupting packaging, and
ultra-processed formulation. Ordinary adult nightlife or alcohol service
is not penalized by itself without evidence of predatory marketing,
youth targeting, addiction-extractive design, or unusual product-safety
misconduct. Range: -5 to 0.
|
-2 |
Florida’s Natural sells fruit juice and lemonade; ordinary juice consumption has sugar-exposure concerns, describes conduct considered under Toxic Products even though the producer structure is cooperative. Linked evidence
|
Bonus Credits
No bonus credits applied in this version.
Confidence Basis
Confidence Basis
Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.
Medium 64/100
5 verified linked claims 5 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 5/12 components covered
This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.
Claim confidence 14/20
5 verified linked claims
Source quality 10/18
Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability
Direct axis-specific claims 6/18
5 direct claims across 12 active components
Dispute load 12/12
0 disputed claims on this entity
Recency 10/10
Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026
Reviewer status 7/12
Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding
Component coverage 4/10
5/12 evidence-bearing components have direct support
Evidence State
Evidence State
Claims and Sources
Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.
* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.1Florida's Natural describes itself as a cooperative of Florida citrus growers rather than a shareholder-owned juice company.
- Florida’s Natural growersGeneral web source · 58%
2Florida's Natural sells refrigerated orange juice and related citrus beverages through grocery channels, preserving some fruit value while converting whole fruit into drinkable sugar exposure.
- Florida’s Natural productsGeneral web source · 58%
3Florida citrus production and juice processing carry land, water, disease-management, and agricultural-input burdens, describes conduct considered under Ecological Harm.
- Florida’s Natural sustainabilityGeneral web source · 58%
4Florida’s Natural sells fruit juice and lemonade; ordinary juice consumption has sugar-exposure concerns, describes conduct considered under Toxic Products even though the producer structure is cooperative.
- Florida’s Natural productsGeneral web source · 58%
5Florida's Natural Growers has lower-carbon food with residual exposure high-carbon product exposure based on its listed business model and current profile description: A Florida citrus grower cooperative selling orange juice, grapefruit juice, lemonade, and related refrigerated grocery beverages. Florida's Natural Growers scores well because ownership is comparatively aligned and gove…
- Florida's Natural Growers public siteGeneral web source · 58%
- Our World in Data: Environmental Impacts of Food ProductionGeneral web source · 58%
Help Improve This Profile
Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.
How This Page Is Maintained
Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.
Civic Note
Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.
Submit evidence for Florida's Natural Growers Add one source-backed fact for review.
Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.
Audit Log
Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.
No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.
View Full Audit Log