public fiber and broadband company

Frontier Communications

A public broadband company selling fiber internet, phone, Wi-Fi, security, and related home services. Frontier earns more product credit where fiber improves household connectivity, but shareholder control, Verizon-acquisition dependence, customer-data collection, legacy service issues, and plan inertia keep it below public or cooperative alternatives.

Why this matters: Frontier is a direct competitor to Verizon Fios, Spectrum, Comcast, AT&T Fiber, and municipal fiber in many local markets.

Letter grade F Malignant Medium confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1 Last reviewed May 11, 2026

Final Score -1* F - Malignant

FMALIGNANT-1 pts

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material15

Bonus+0

Cap35Ownership <= 2 and Governance <= 2

After Cap15

Penalties-16

Private Government badge

Frontier Communications receives the Private Government badge because it combines large-scale private rule-setting over customers, workers, users, members, or counterparties with OpenLobby-documented lobbying of about $2.7M on public policy issues.

Evidence: [11]

!Not Verified

Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Evaluation Overview

F - Malignant

The score turns mainly on Product Integrity, with the largest penalty coming from Policy Capture.

Strengths

Product Integrity4/5
Extraction2/10
Market Conduct2/5

Penalties

Policy Capture-7
Subscription Capture-2
Accountability Opacity-2
Surveillance Capture-2

Evidence state

ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Linked claims11
Direct axis claims10
Coverage10/16

Scoring Axes

Axis	Score	Why this score
Ownership ? Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.	1 / 10	Frontier Communications is controlled by shareholders, private owners, family ownership, or private equity rather than by customers, workers, subscribers, municipalities, or affected communities. Frontier Communications is controlled by shareholders, private owners, family ownership, or private equity rather than by customers, workers, subscribers, municipalities, or affected communities. That keeps Frontier Communications low on Ownership: decisive control remains with shareholders, private owners, executives, or state insiders rather than affected people. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Linked evidence Frontier Communications is controlled by shareholders, private owners, family ownership, or private equity rather than by customers, workers, subscribers, municipalities, or affected communities. [1]
Governance ? Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.	1 / 10	Frontier Communications sells household connectivity, mobile, broadband, TV, satellite, device, or business-network services; the product has high practical utility, but users depend on… Frontier Communications sells household connectivity, mobile, broadband, TV, satellite, device, or business-network services; the product has high practical utility, but users depend on concentrated networks, plans, equipment, and account systems rather than a simple competitive purchase. That keeps Frontier Communications low on Governance: ordinary users, workers, customers, or affected communities cannot change the rules that govern them. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Linked evidence context Frontier Communications sells household connectivity, mobile, broadband, TV, satellite, device, or business-network services; the product has high practical utility, but users depend on concentrated networks, plans, equipment, and account systems rather than a simple competitive purchase. [2] context Frontier Communications is controlled by shareholders, private owners, family ownership, or private equity rather than by customers, workers, subscribers, municipalities, or affected communities. [1] context Frontier Communications operates in telecom, broadband, satellite, TV, or mobile markets where local scarcity, switching costs, bundles, equipment, spectrum, franchises, and network effects give providers unusual power over customers. [3]
Extraction ? Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.	2 / 10	Frontier Communications sells household connectivity, mobile, broadband, TV, satellite, device, or business-network services; the product has high practical utility, but users depend on… Frontier Communications sells household connectivity, mobile, broadband, TV, satellite, device, or business-network services; the product has high practical utility, but users depend on concentrated networks, plans, equipment, and account systems rather than a simple competitive purchase. That keeps Frontier Communications low on Extraction: the business model makes extraction from workers, users, suppliers, customers, or the public central rather than incidental. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Linked evidence context Frontier Communications sells household connectivity, mobile, broadband, TV, satellite, device, or business-network services; the product has high practical utility, but users depend on concentrated networks, plans, equipment, and account systems rather than a simple competitive purchase. [2] context Frontier Communications is controlled by shareholders, private owners, family ownership, or private equity rather than by customers, workers, subscribers, municipalities, or affected communities. [1] context Frontier Communications operates in telecom, broadband, satellite, TV, or mobile markets where local scarcity, switching costs, bundles, equipment, spectrum, franchises, and network effects give providers unusual power over customers. [3]
Labor Sovereignty ? Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.	1 / 7	Frontier Communications sells household connectivity, mobile, broadband, TV, satellite, device, or business-network services; the product has high practical utility, but users depend on… Frontier Communications sells household connectivity, mobile, broadband, TV, satellite, device, or business-network services; the product has high practical utility, but users depend on concentrated networks, plans, equipment, and account systems rather than a simple competitive purchase. That keeps Frontier Communications low on Labor Sovereignty: labor remains managerially controlled, replaceable, or exposed to coercive employment and contracting conditions. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Linked evidence context Frontier Communications sells household connectivity, mobile, broadband, TV, satellite, device, or business-network services; the product has high practical utility, but users depend on concentrated networks, plans, equipment, and account systems rather than a simple competitive purchase. [2] context Frontier Communications is controlled by shareholders, private owners, family ownership, or private equity rather than by customers, workers, subscribers, municipalities, or affected communities. [1] context Frontier Communications operates in telecom, broadband, satellite, TV, or mobile markets where local scarcity, switching costs, bundles, equipment, spectrum, franchises, and network effects give providers unusual power over customers. [3]
Solidarity with the Unemployed ? Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.	1 / 7	Frontier Communications sells household connectivity, mobile, broadband, TV, satellite, device, or business-network services; the product has high practical utility, but users depend on… Frontier Communications sells household connectivity, mobile, broadband, TV, satellite, device, or business-network services; the product has high practical utility, but users depend on concentrated networks, plans, equipment, and account systems rather than a simple competitive purchase. That keeps Frontier Communications low on Solidarity with the Unemployed: the model provides little protection for people who leave, are excluded, or cannot bargain from employment. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Linked evidence context Frontier Communications sells household connectivity, mobile, broadband, TV, satellite, device, or business-network services; the product has high practical utility, but users depend on concentrated networks, plans, equipment, and account systems rather than a simple competitive purchase. [2] context Frontier Communications is controlled by shareholders, private owners, family ownership, or private equity rather than by customers, workers, subscribers, municipalities, or affected communities. [1] context Frontier Communications operates in telecom, broadband, satellite, TV, or mobile markets where local scarcity, switching costs, bundles, equipment, spectrum, franchises, and network effects give providers unusual power over customers. [3]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity ? Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.	1 / 7	Frontier Communications sells household connectivity, mobile, broadband, TV, satellite, device, or business-network services; the product has high practical utility, but users depend on… Frontier Communications sells household connectivity, mobile, broadband, TV, satellite, device, or business-network services; the product has high practical utility, but users depend on concentrated networks, plans, equipment, and account systems rather than a simple competitive purchase. That keeps Frontier Communications low on Loss-Bearing Fidelity: losses, hazards, or adjustment costs are routinely pushed onto workers, customers, suppliers, communities, or the public. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Linked evidence context Frontier Communications sells household connectivity, mobile, broadband, TV, satellite, device, or business-network services; the product has high practical utility, but users depend on concentrated networks, plans, equipment, and account systems rather than a simple competitive purchase. [2] context Frontier Communications is controlled by shareholders, private owners, family ownership, or private equity rather than by customers, workers, subscribers, municipalities, or affected communities. [1] context Frontier Communications operates in telecom, broadband, satellite, TV, or mobile markets where local scarcity, switching costs, bundles, equipment, spectrum, franchises, and network effects give providers unusual power over customers. [3]
Market Conduct ? Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.	2 / 5	Frontier Communications operates in telecom, broadband, satellite, TV, or mobile markets where local scarcity, switching costs, bundles, equipment, spectrum, franchises, and network effects give providers unusual power over customers. Frontier Communications operates in telecom, broadband, satellite, TV, or mobile markets where local scarcity, switching costs, bundles, equipment, spectrum, franchises, and network effects give providers unusual power over customers. That places Frontier Communications in the middle of Market Conduct: the product has real value but still uses meaningful lock-in, gatekeeping, market power, or dependency. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Linked evidence Frontier Communications operates in telecom, broadband, satellite, TV, or mobile markets where local scarcity, switching costs, bundles, equipment, spectrum, franchises, and network effects give providers unusual power over customers. [3]
Product Integrity ? Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.	4 / 5	Frontier Communications sells household connectivity, mobile, broadband, TV, satellite, device, or business-network services; the product has high practical utility, but users depend on… Frontier Communications sells household connectivity, mobile, broadband, TV, satellite, device, or business-network services; the product has high practical utility, but users depend on concentrated networks, plans, equipment, and account systems rather than a simple competitive purchase. That places Frontier Communications high on Product Integrity: the core offering is genuinely useful and comparatively less dependent on traps, degradation, or harmful dependencies. A still-higher or maximum value requires stronger proof that this structure is durable, broad, and not merely discretionary. Linked evidence Frontier Communications sells household connectivity, mobile, broadband, TV, satellite, device, or business-network services; the product has high practical utility, but users depend on concentrated networks, plans, equipment, and account systems rather than a simple competitive purchase. [2]
Scale Integrity ? Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.	2 / 5	Frontier Communications sells household connectivity, mobile, broadband, TV, satellite, device, or business-network services; the product has high practical utility, but users depend on… Frontier Communications sells household connectivity, mobile, broadband, TV, satellite, device, or business-network services; the product has high practical utility, but users depend on concentrated networks, plans, equipment, and account systems rather than a simple competitive purchase. That places Frontier Communications in the middle of Scale Integrity: scale brings useful reach but also weakens accountability, transparency, or local constraint. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Linked evidence context Frontier Communications sells household connectivity, mobile, broadband, TV, satellite, device, or business-network services; the product has high practical utility, but users depend on concentrated networks, plans, equipment, and account systems rather than a simple competitive purchase. [2] context Frontier Communications is controlled by shareholders, private owners, family ownership, or private equity rather than by customers, workers, subscribers, municipalities, or affected communities. [1] context Frontier Communications operates in telecom, broadband, satellite, TV, or mobile markets where local scarcity, switching costs, bundles, equipment, spectrum, franchises, and network effects give providers unusual power over customers. [3]

Penalties

Penalty	Applied	Why this penalty
Ecological Harm ? Footprint, trajectory, irreversibility, culpability, and scale, including whether ecological harm is central to the model and continued after credible notice. Range: -30 to 0.	-1	Frontier Communications has environmental burden from network infrastructure, data centers, devices, equipment replacement, trucks, energy use, satellites, spectrum infrastructure, packaging, and e-waste. Frontier Communications has environmental burden from network infrastructure, data centers, devices, equipment replacement, trucks, energy use, satellites, spectrum infrastructure, packaging, and e-waste. That warrants a limited Ecological Harm penalty because the institution causes or defends ecological damage that is more than incidental to the model. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Linked evidence Frontier Communications has environmental burden from network infrastructure, data centers, devices, equipment replacement, trucks, energy use, satellites, spectrum infrastructure, packaging, and e-waste. [4]
Policy Capture ? Private-interest attempts to bend law, regulation, subsidies, taxes, enforcement, trade, labor, safety, competition, environmental, healthcare, housing, surveillance, civil-liberties, or consumer policy against workers, customers, citizens, affected communities, or ecological life. Public-interest advocacy is not penalized merely because it is lobbying. Range: -15 to 0.	-7	OpenLobby records FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS lobbying on communications and technology with about $2.7M in spending across 31 filings; the reviewed filings document private institutional lobbying over public rules rather than a public-interest advocacy role. OpenLobby records FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS lobbying on communications and technology with about $2.7M in spending across 31 filings; the reviewed filings document private institutional lobbying over public rules rather than a public-interest advocacy role. That warrants a substantial Policy Capture penalty because private institutional pressure is being applied to public rules while affected people cannot democratically govern that agenda. The value is substantial but not at the floor because the linked record shows serious conduct without the strongest aggravating factors on this axis. Linked evidence OpenLobby records FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS lobbying on communications and technology with about $2.7M in spending across 31 filings; the reviewed filings document private institutional lobbying over public rules rather than a public-interest advocacy role. [10]
Subscription Capture ? Manipulative recurring-payment, automatic-renewal, cancellation-friction, bundling, trial-conversion, or refund designs that profit from inertia or confusion. Range: -5 to 0.	-2	Frontier Communications depends on recurring monthly bills, promotional pricing, bundles, equipment fees, device financing, contracts, loyalty inertia, and cancellation friction rather than one-time purchases. Frontier Communications depends on recurring monthly bills, promotional pricing, bundles, equipment fees, device financing, contracts, loyalty inertia, and cancellation friction rather than one-time purchases. That warrants a substantial Subscription Capture penalty because recurring-payment design profits from inertia, confusion, bundling, renewal friction, or cancellation difficulty. The value is substantial but not at the floor because the linked record shows serious conduct without the strongest aggravating factors on this axis. Linked evidence Frontier Communications depends on recurring monthly bills, promotional pricing, bundles, equipment fees, device financing, contracts, loyalty inertia, and cancellation friction rather than one-time purchases. [5]
Accountability Opacity ? Material opacity, reputation laundering, or hidden accountability structures that prevent public accountability. Range: -2 to 0.	-2	Frontier Communications publishes service terms and notices, but ordinary customers often cannot easily compare total price, data practices, throttling, equipment fees, bundle terms, renewal pricing, arbitration, and cancellation effects at purchase time. Frontier Communications publishes service terms and notices, but ordinary customers often cannot easily compare total price, data practices, throttling, equipment fees, bundle terms, renewal pricing, arbitration, and cancellation effects at purchase time. That warrants a severe Accountability Opacity penalty because material facts, risks, conflicts, ownership, or accountability information are obscured from the public. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Linked evidence Frontier Communications publishes service terms and notices, but ordinary customers often cannot easily compare total price, data practices, throttling, equipment fees, bundle terms, renewal pricing, arbitration, and cancellation effects at purchase time. [6]
Identity Capture ? Customer pressure, employee pressure, and pervasive identity saturation. Range: -3 to 0.	-1	Frontier Communications turns connectivity, devices, sports packages, entertainment bundles, or network allegiance into brand identity beyond basic utility service. Frontier Communications turns connectivity, devices, sports packages, entertainment bundles, or network allegiance into brand identity beyond basic utility service. That warrants a limited Identity Capture penalty because users, workers, customers, or publics are pressured into identity attachment that protects institutional power. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Linked evidence Frontier Communications turns connectivity, devices, sports packages, entertainment bundles, or network allegiance into brand identity beyond basic utility service. [7]
Surveillance Capture ? Invasive surveillance, unreasonably non-optional tracking, facial recognition, biometric identification, or AI behavior scanning of customers, workers, bystanders, or the public. Range: -5 to 0.	-2	Frontier Communications privacy materials, transparency reports, or enforcement history show collection, processing, disclosure, or legal-demand handling of sensitive communications, location, browsing, viewing, device, account, or network-use data. Frontier Communications privacy materials, transparency reports, or enforcement history show collection, processing, disclosure, or legal-demand handling of sensitive communications, location, browsing, viewing, device, account, or network-use data. That warrants a substantial Surveillance Capture penalty because customers, workers, users, bystanders, or the public are exposed to invasive tracking, biometrics, or behavior scanning. The value is substantial but not at the floor because the linked record shows serious conduct without the strongest aggravating factors on this axis. Linked evidence Frontier Communications privacy materials, transparency reports, or enforcement history show collection, processing, disclosure, or legal-demand handling of sensitive communications, location, browsing, viewing, device, account, or network-use data. [8]
Ideological Disavowal ? Concealed ideology presented as neutrality, expertise, professional necessity, public-service administration, market inevitability, or non-ideological common sense while exercising power. Range: -3 to 0.	-1	Frontier Communications presents network access as neutral innovation or customer choice while underplaying the institutional power created by concentrated infrastructure, recurring billing, data access, and weak customer exit. Frontier Communications presents network access as neutral innovation or customer choice while underplaying the institutional power created by concentrated infrastructure, recurring billing, data access, and weak customer exit. That warrants a limited Ideological Disavowal penalty because the institution presents situated, contested choices as neutrality, expertise, inevitability, safety, or common sense. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Linked evidence Frontier Communications presents network access as neutral innovation or customer choice while underplaying the institutional power created by concentrated infrastructure, recurring billing, data access, and weak customer exit. [9]

Bonus Credits

No bonus credits applied in this version.

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

Medium 70/100

10 verified linked claims 10 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 10/16 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 14/20

10 verified linked claims

Source quality 12/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 9/18

10 direct claims across 16 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 6/10

10/16 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending

VerificationUnverified

ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)

ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)

Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.

Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

1Frontier Communications is controlled by shareholders, private owners, family ownership, or private equity rather than by customers, workers, subscribers, municipalities, or affected communities.

Ownership Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

Frontier privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
Frontier policies pageGeneral web source · 58%
Frontier annual customer noticeGeneral web source · 58%
Frontier 2025 investor summary via SEC filing trackerSocial or commentary source · 40%

2Frontier Communications sells household connectivity, mobile, broadband, TV, satellite, device, or business-network services; the product has high practical utility, but users depend on concentrated networks, plans, equipment, and account systems rather than a simple competitive purchase.

Product Integrity Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

Frontier privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
Frontier policies pageGeneral web source · 58%
Frontier annual customer noticeGeneral web source · 58%
Frontier 2025 investor summary via SEC filing trackerSocial or commentary source · 40%

3Frontier Communications operates in telecom, broadband, satellite, TV, or mobile markets where local scarcity, switching costs, bundles, equipment, spectrum, franchises, and network effects give providers unusual power over customers.

Market Conduct Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

Frontier privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
Frontier policies pageGeneral web source · 58%
Frontier annual customer noticeGeneral web source · 58%
Frontier 2025 investor summary via SEC filing trackerSocial or commentary source · 40%

4Frontier Communications has environmental burden from network infrastructure, data centers, devices, equipment replacement, trucks, energy use, satellites, spectrum infrastructure, packaging, and e-waste.

Ecological Harm Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

Frontier privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
Frontier policies pageGeneral web source · 58%
Frontier annual customer noticeGeneral web source · 58%
Frontier 2025 investor summary via SEC filing trackerSocial or commentary source · 40%

5Frontier Communications depends on recurring monthly bills, promotional pricing, bundles, equipment fees, device financing, contracts, loyalty inertia, and cancellation friction rather than one-time purchases.

Subscription Capture Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

Frontier privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
Frontier policies pageGeneral web source · 58%
Frontier annual customer noticeGeneral web source · 58%
Frontier 2025 investor summary via SEC filing trackerSocial or commentary source · 40%

6Frontier Communications publishes service terms and notices, but ordinary customers often cannot easily compare total price, data practices, throttling, equipment fees, bundle terms, renewal pricing, arbitration, and cancellation effects at purchase time.

Accountability Opacity Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

Frontier privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
Frontier policies pageGeneral web source · 58%
Frontier annual customer noticeGeneral web source · 58%
Frontier 2025 investor summary via SEC filing trackerSocial or commentary source · 40%

7Frontier Communications turns connectivity, devices, sports packages, entertainment bundles, or network allegiance into brand identity beyond basic utility service.

Identity Capture Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

Frontier privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
Frontier policies pageGeneral web source · 58%
Frontier annual customer noticeGeneral web source · 58%
Frontier 2025 investor summary via SEC filing trackerSocial or commentary source · 40%

8Frontier Communications privacy materials, transparency reports, or enforcement history show collection, processing, disclosure, or legal-demand handling of sensitive communications, location, browsing, viewing, device, account, or network-use data.

Surveillance Capture Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

Frontier privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
Frontier policies pageGeneral web source · 58%
Frontier annual customer noticeGeneral web source · 58%
Frontier 2025 investor summary via SEC filing trackerSocial or commentary source · 40%

9Frontier Communications presents network access as neutral innovation or customer choice while underplaying the institutional power created by concentrated infrastructure, recurring billing, data access, and weak customer exit.

Ideological Disavowal Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

Frontier privacy policyOfficial self-description · 68%
Frontier policies pageGeneral web source · 58%
Frontier annual customer noticeGeneral web source · 58%
Frontier 2025 investor summary via SEC filing trackerSocial or commentary source · 40%

10OpenLobby records FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS lobbying on communications and technology with about $2.7M in spending across 31 filings; the reviewed filings document private institutional lobbying over public rules rather than a public-interest advocacy role.

Policy Capture Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

OpenLobby — FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS lobbying profileGeneral web source · 58%

11Frontier Communications receives the Private Government badge because it combines large-scale private rule-setting over customers, workers, users, members, or counterparties with OpenLobby-documented lobbying of about $2.7M on public policy issues.

Private Government Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

OpenLobby — FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS lobbying profileGeneral web source · 58%

Alternatives

Competitors

AGOOD65 EveryoneOn digital inclusion nonprofit for affordable internet and devices · same market AGOOD58 Human-I-T nonprofit digital-inclusion and electronics-reuse organization · same market AGOOD58 PCs for People nonprofit low-cost computer and internet provider · same market AGOOD53 EPB Fiber municipal fiber internet utility · same market AGOOD53 Longmont NextLight municipal fiber internet utility · same market DEXTRACTIVE5 Lumen Technologies / CenturyLink / Quantum Fiber public telecom and fiber company · same market DEXTRACTIVE3 Cox Communications private broadband and cable company · same market FMALIGNANT-1 Altice USA / Optimum public broadband and cable company · same market

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for Frontier Communications Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.

View Full Audit Log