community meal-prep and food-access organization

Full Belly Foods

Industry Food

A Washington, D.C. food-access organization providing prepared meals, grocery support, and community food programming. Full Belly Foods scores well because the meal-prep function is embedded in local food security rather than only premium convenience, though the public materials reviewed do not show worker ownership.

Why this matters: Full Belly is a strong comparison point for meal prep because it treats prepared food as community infrastructure.

Letter grade B Qualified High confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1 Last reviewed May 13, 2026

Final Score 48* B - Qualified

BQUALIFIED48 pts

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material46

Bonus+4

Cap66No structure cap

After Cap50

Penalties-2

Small business context

This entry is classified as a small business using observable scale signals: independent control, local or limited operations, and no evidence of public-company or national-chain scale. The small-business calibration keeps the ordinary rubric but reads evidence at person scale: living-wage pricing is not extraction by itself, while worker and contractor treatment, owner surplus, transparency, advertising pressure, dissent tolerance, and recourse matter more. Harm, toxicity, surveillance, labor, coercion, opacity, and hidden-parent penalties are not relaxed.

Applied cap: No structure cap

!Not Verified

Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Evaluation Overview

B - Qualified

The score turns mainly on Extraction, with the largest penalty coming from High-Carbon Products.

Strengths

Extraction7/10
Solidarity with the Unemployed7/7
Loss-Bearing Fidelity6/7

Penalties

High-Carbon Products-1
Subscription Capture-1

Evidence state

ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Linked claims13
Direct axis claims13
Coverage13/13

Scoring Axes

Axis	Score	Why this score
Ownership ? Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.	4 / 10	Full Belly Foods's public record identifies its ownership, parent relationship, or institutional form in the meal-kit, prepared-meal, or food-delivery market. Full Belly Foods's public record identifies its ownership, parent relationship, or institutional form in the meal-kit, prepared-meal, or food-delivery market. On Ownership, Full Belly Foods sits in the positive middle: the service provides real meal-planning or prepared-food utility and shows some mission, sourcing, product, or local-chef strength. It remains below the cooperative kitchens because customers and workers still do not hold binding control over the institution. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Meal-delivery expansion calibrated across worker-owned community kitchens, local farmer-supported prepared meals, plant-forward subscriptions, organic meal kits, parent-owned meal-kit brands, and food-platform consolidators. Linked evidence Full Belly Foods's public record identifies its ownership, parent relationship, or institutional form in the meal-kit, prepared-meal, or food-delivery market. [1] context Full Belly Foods's public materials show whether control is held by workers, a cooperative kitchen, founders, a private platform, a public company, or a parent food group. [2] context Full Belly Foods's model determines whether meal value is routed through cooperative kitchens, local farmers, public-benefit food work, private subscriptions, or platform scale. [3] context Full Belly Foods's reviewed public record shows the degree to which cooks, delivery workers, farmers, chefs, or ordinary employees have binding power rather than vendor or employment dependence. [4] context Full Belly Foods's service affects access to prepared food, home cooking, disability-friendly meal support, local farmer demand, chef income, or lower-friction meal planning. [5] context Full Belly Foods's public model affects whether spoilage, missed delivery, food-safety, cancellation, packaging, and meal-selection risks are absorbed by the institution or shifted to customers and workers. [6] context Full Belly Foods operates in a market where customers often face recurring orders, changing menus, plan deadlines, delivery windows, shipping fees, and freshness uncertainty. [7] context Full Belly Foods's core product integrity depends on ingredient quality, prepared-food safety, nutritional quality, packaging, accurate menus, and whether convenience improves or degrades ordinary meals. [8] context Full Belly Foods's scale, distribution network, platform role, or local-kitchen model affects whether growth strengthens food access or turns meals into a consolidated private subscription system. [9]
Governance ? Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.	5 / 10	Full Belly Foods's linked public materials show whether control is held by workers, a cooperative kitchen, founders, a private platform, a public company, or a parent food group. Full Belly Foods's linked public materials show whether control is held by workers, a cooperative kitchen, founders, a private platform, a public company, or a parent food group. On Governance, Full Belly Foods sits in the positive middle: the service provides real meal-planning or prepared-food utility and shows some mission, sourcing, product, or local-chef strength. It remains below the cooperative kitchens because customers and workers still do not hold binding control over the institution. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Meal-delivery expansion calibrated across worker-owned community kitchens, local farmer-supported prepared meals, plant-forward subscriptions, organic meal kits, parent-owned meal-kit brands, and food-platform consolidators. Linked evidence context Full Belly Foods's public record identifies its ownership, parent relationship, or institutional form in the meal-kit, prepared-meal, or food-delivery market. [1] Full Belly Foods's public materials show whether control is held by workers, a cooperative kitchen, founders, a private platform, a public company, or a parent food group. [2] context Full Belly Foods's model determines whether meal value is routed through cooperative kitchens, local farmers, public-benefit food work, private subscriptions, or platform scale. [3] context Full Belly Foods's reviewed public record shows the degree to which cooks, delivery workers, farmers, chefs, or ordinary employees have binding power rather than vendor or employment dependence. [4] context Full Belly Foods's service affects access to prepared food, home cooking, disability-friendly meal support, local farmer demand, chef income, or lower-friction meal planning. [5] context Full Belly Foods's public model affects whether spoilage, missed delivery, food-safety, cancellation, packaging, and meal-selection risks are absorbed by the institution or shifted to customers and workers. [6] context Full Belly Foods operates in a market where customers often face recurring orders, changing menus, plan deadlines, delivery windows, shipping fees, and freshness uncertainty. [7] context Full Belly Foods's core product integrity depends on ingredient quality, prepared-food safety, nutritional quality, packaging, accurate menus, and whether convenience improves or degrades ordinary meals. [8] context Full Belly Foods's scale, distribution network, platform role, or local-kitchen model affects whether growth strengthens food access or turns meals into a consolidated private subscription system. [9]
Extraction ? Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.	7 / 10	Full Belly Foods's model determines whether meal value is routed through cooperative kitchens, local farmers, public-benefit food work, private subscriptions, or platform scale. Full Belly Foods's model determines whether meal value is routed through cooperative kitchens, local farmers, public-benefit food work, private subscriptions, or platform scale. On Extraction, Full Belly Foods sits near the top of this category because meal convenience is tied to worker control, community support, local food stewardship, or direct farmer support instead of being captured mainly by outside investors. The value remains below perfect where the model is small, geographically narrow, or only partially democratic. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Meal-delivery expansion calibrated across worker-owned community kitchens, local farmer-supported prepared meals, plant-forward subscriptions, organic meal kits, parent-owned meal-kit brands, and food-platform consolidators. Linked evidence context Full Belly Foods's public record identifies its ownership, parent relationship, or institutional form in the meal-kit, prepared-meal, or food-delivery market. [1] context Full Belly Foods's public materials show whether control is held by workers, a cooperative kitchen, founders, a private platform, a public company, or a parent food group. [2] Full Belly Foods's model determines whether meal value is routed through cooperative kitchens, local farmers, public-benefit food work, private subscriptions, or platform scale. [3] context Full Belly Foods's reviewed public record shows the degree to which cooks, delivery workers, farmers, chefs, or ordinary employees have binding power rather than vendor or employment dependence. [4] context Full Belly Foods's service affects access to prepared food, home cooking, disability-friendly meal support, local farmer demand, chef income, or lower-friction meal planning. [5] context Full Belly Foods's public model affects whether spoilage, missed delivery, food-safety, cancellation, packaging, and meal-selection risks are absorbed by the institution or shifted to customers and workers. [6] context Full Belly Foods operates in a market where customers often face recurring orders, changing menus, plan deadlines, delivery windows, shipping fees, and freshness uncertainty. [7] context Full Belly Foods's core product integrity depends on ingredient quality, prepared-food safety, nutritional quality, packaging, accurate menus, and whether convenience improves or degrades ordinary meals. [8] context Full Belly Foods's scale, distribution network, platform role, or local-kitchen model affects whether growth strengthens food access or turns meals into a consolidated private subscription system. [9]
Labor Sovereignty ? Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.	4 / 7	Full Belly Foods's reviewed public record shows the degree to which cooks, delivery workers, farmers, chefs, or ordinary employees have binding power rather than vendor or employment dependence. Full Belly Foods's reviewed public record shows the degree to which cooks, delivery workers, farmers, chefs, or ordinary employees have binding power rather than vendor or employment dependence. On Labor Sovereignty, Full Belly Foods sits in the positive middle: the service provides real meal-planning or prepared-food utility and shows some mission, sourcing, product, or local-chef strength. It remains below the cooperative kitchens because customers and workers still do not hold binding control over the institution. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Meal-delivery expansion calibrated across worker-owned community kitchens, local farmer-supported prepared meals, plant-forward subscriptions, organic meal kits, parent-owned meal-kit brands, and food-platform consolidators. Linked evidence context Full Belly Foods's public record identifies its ownership, parent relationship, or institutional form in the meal-kit, prepared-meal, or food-delivery market. [1] context Full Belly Foods's public materials show whether control is held by workers, a cooperative kitchen, founders, a private platform, a public company, or a parent food group. [2] context Full Belly Foods's model determines whether meal value is routed through cooperative kitchens, local farmers, public-benefit food work, private subscriptions, or platform scale. [3] Full Belly Foods's reviewed public record shows the degree to which cooks, delivery workers, farmers, chefs, or ordinary employees have binding power rather than vendor or employment dependence. [4] context Full Belly Foods's service affects access to prepared food, home cooking, disability-friendly meal support, local farmer demand, chef income, or lower-friction meal planning. [5] context Full Belly Foods's public model affects whether spoilage, missed delivery, food-safety, cancellation, packaging, and meal-selection risks are absorbed by the institution or shifted to customers and workers. [6] context Full Belly Foods operates in a market where customers often face recurring orders, changing menus, plan deadlines, delivery windows, shipping fees, and freshness uncertainty. [7] context Full Belly Foods's core product integrity depends on ingredient quality, prepared-food safety, nutritional quality, packaging, accurate menus, and whether convenience improves or degrades ordinary meals. [8] context Full Belly Foods's scale, distribution network, platform role, or local-kitchen model affects whether growth strengthens food access or turns meals into a consolidated private subscription system. [9]
Solidarity with the Unemployed ? Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.	7 / 7	Full Belly Foods's service affects access to prepared food, home cooking, disability-friendly meal support, local farmer demand, chef income, or lower-friction meal planning. Full Belly Foods's service affects access to prepared food, home cooking, disability-friendly meal support, local farmer demand, chef income, or lower-friction meal planning. On Solidarity with the Unemployed, Full Belly Foods sits near the top of this category because meal convenience is tied to worker control, community support, local food stewardship, or direct farmer support instead of being captured mainly by outside investors. The value remains below perfect where the model is small, geographically narrow, or only partially democratic. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Meal-delivery expansion calibrated across worker-owned community kitchens, local farmer-supported prepared meals, plant-forward subscriptions, organic meal kits, parent-owned meal-kit brands, and food-platform consolidators. Linked evidence context Full Belly Foods's public record identifies its ownership, parent relationship, or institutional form in the meal-kit, prepared-meal, or food-delivery market. [1] context Full Belly Foods's public materials show whether control is held by workers, a cooperative kitchen, founders, a private platform, a public company, or a parent food group. [2] context Full Belly Foods's model determines whether meal value is routed through cooperative kitchens, local farmers, public-benefit food work, private subscriptions, or platform scale. [3] context Full Belly Foods's reviewed public record shows the degree to which cooks, delivery workers, farmers, chefs, or ordinary employees have binding power rather than vendor or employment dependence. [4] Full Belly Foods's service affects access to prepared food, home cooking, disability-friendly meal support, local farmer demand, chef income, or lower-friction meal planning. [5] context Full Belly Foods's public model affects whether spoilage, missed delivery, food-safety, cancellation, packaging, and meal-selection risks are absorbed by the institution or shifted to customers and workers. [6] context Full Belly Foods operates in a market where customers often face recurring orders, changing menus, plan deadlines, delivery windows, shipping fees, and freshness uncertainty. [7] context Full Belly Foods's core product integrity depends on ingredient quality, prepared-food safety, nutritional quality, packaging, accurate menus, and whether convenience improves or degrades ordinary meals. [8] context Full Belly Foods's scale, distribution network, platform role, or local-kitchen model affects whether growth strengthens food access or turns meals into a consolidated private subscription system. [9]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity ? Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.	6 / 7	Full Belly Foods's public model affects whether spoilage, missed delivery, food-safety, cancellation, packaging, and meal-selection risks are absorbed by the institution or shifted to customers and workers. Full Belly Foods's public model affects whether spoilage, missed delivery, food-safety, cancellation, packaging, and meal-selection risks are absorbed by the institution or shifted to customers and workers. On Loss-Bearing Fidelity, Full Belly Foods sits in the positive middle: the service provides real meal-planning or prepared-food utility and shows some mission, sourcing, product, or local-chef strength. It remains below the cooperative kitchens because customers and workers still do not hold binding control over the institution. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Meal-delivery expansion calibrated across worker-owned community kitchens, local farmer-supported prepared meals, plant-forward subscriptions, organic meal kits, parent-owned meal-kit brands, and food-platform consolidators. Linked evidence context Full Belly Foods's public record identifies its ownership, parent relationship, or institutional form in the meal-kit, prepared-meal, or food-delivery market. [1] context Full Belly Foods's public materials show whether control is held by workers, a cooperative kitchen, founders, a private platform, a public company, or a parent food group. [2] context Full Belly Foods's model determines whether meal value is routed through cooperative kitchens, local farmers, public-benefit food work, private subscriptions, or platform scale. [3] context Full Belly Foods's reviewed public record shows the degree to which cooks, delivery workers, farmers, chefs, or ordinary employees have binding power rather than vendor or employment dependence. [4] context Full Belly Foods's service affects access to prepared food, home cooking, disability-friendly meal support, local farmer demand, chef income, or lower-friction meal planning. [5] Full Belly Foods's public model affects whether spoilage, missed delivery, food-safety, cancellation, packaging, and meal-selection risks are absorbed by the institution or shifted to customers and workers. [6] context Full Belly Foods operates in a market where customers often face recurring orders, changing menus, plan deadlines, delivery windows, shipping fees, and freshness uncertainty. [7] context Full Belly Foods's core product integrity depends on ingredient quality, prepared-food safety, nutritional quality, packaging, accurate menus, and whether convenience improves or degrades ordinary meals. [8] context Full Belly Foods's scale, distribution network, platform role, or local-kitchen model affects whether growth strengthens food access or turns meals into a consolidated private subscription system. [9]
Market Conduct ? Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.	5 / 5	Full Belly Foods operates in a market where customers often face recurring orders, changing menus, plan deadlines, delivery windows, shipping fees, and freshness uncertainty. Full Belly Foods operates in a market where customers often face recurring orders, changing menus, plan deadlines, delivery windows, shipping fees, and freshness uncertainty. On Market Conduct, Full Belly Foods sits in the positive middle: the service provides real meal-planning or prepared-food utility and shows some mission, sourcing, product, or local-chef strength. It remains below the cooperative kitchens because customers and workers still do not hold binding control over the institution. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Meal-delivery expansion calibrated across worker-owned community kitchens, local farmer-supported prepared meals, plant-forward subscriptions, organic meal kits, parent-owned meal-kit brands, and food-platform consolidators. Linked evidence context Full Belly Foods's public record identifies its ownership, parent relationship, or institutional form in the meal-kit, prepared-meal, or food-delivery market. [1] context Full Belly Foods's public materials show whether control is held by workers, a cooperative kitchen, founders, a private platform, a public company, or a parent food group. [2] context Full Belly Foods's model determines whether meal value is routed through cooperative kitchens, local farmers, public-benefit food work, private subscriptions, or platform scale. [3] context Full Belly Foods's reviewed public record shows the degree to which cooks, delivery workers, farmers, chefs, or ordinary employees have binding power rather than vendor or employment dependence. [4] context Full Belly Foods's service affects access to prepared food, home cooking, disability-friendly meal support, local farmer demand, chef income, or lower-friction meal planning. [5] context Full Belly Foods's public model affects whether spoilage, missed delivery, food-safety, cancellation, packaging, and meal-selection risks are absorbed by the institution or shifted to customers and workers. [6] Full Belly Foods operates in a market where customers often face recurring orders, changing menus, plan deadlines, delivery windows, shipping fees, and freshness uncertainty. [7] context Full Belly Foods's core product integrity depends on ingredient quality, prepared-food safety, nutritional quality, packaging, accurate menus, and whether convenience improves or degrades ordinary meals. [8] context Full Belly Foods's scale, distribution network, platform role, or local-kitchen model affects whether growth strengthens food access or turns meals into a consolidated private subscription system. [9]
Product Integrity ? Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.	5 / 5	Full Belly Foods's core product integrity depends on ingredient quality, prepared-food safety, nutritional quality, packaging, accurate menus, and whether convenience improves or degrades ordinary meals. Full Belly Foods's core product integrity depends on ingredient quality, prepared-food safety, nutritional quality, packaging, accurate menus, and whether convenience improves or degrades ordinary meals. On Product Integrity, Full Belly Foods sits in the positive middle: the service provides real meal-planning or prepared-food utility and shows some mission, sourcing, product, or local-chef strength. It remains below the cooperative kitchens because customers and workers still do not hold binding control over the institution. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Meal-delivery expansion calibrated across worker-owned community kitchens, local farmer-supported prepared meals, plant-forward subscriptions, organic meal kits, parent-owned meal-kit brands, and food-platform consolidators. Linked evidence context Full Belly Foods's public record identifies its ownership, parent relationship, or institutional form in the meal-kit, prepared-meal, or food-delivery market. [1] context Full Belly Foods's public materials show whether control is held by workers, a cooperative kitchen, founders, a private platform, a public company, or a parent food group. [2] context Full Belly Foods's model determines whether meal value is routed through cooperative kitchens, local farmers, public-benefit food work, private subscriptions, or platform scale. [3] context Full Belly Foods's reviewed public record shows the degree to which cooks, delivery workers, farmers, chefs, or ordinary employees have binding power rather than vendor or employment dependence. [4] context Full Belly Foods's service affects access to prepared food, home cooking, disability-friendly meal support, local farmer demand, chef income, or lower-friction meal planning. [5] context Full Belly Foods's public model affects whether spoilage, missed delivery, food-safety, cancellation, packaging, and meal-selection risks are absorbed by the institution or shifted to customers and workers. [6] context Full Belly Foods operates in a market where customers often face recurring orders, changing menus, plan deadlines, delivery windows, shipping fees, and freshness uncertainty. [7] Full Belly Foods's core product integrity depends on ingredient quality, prepared-food safety, nutritional quality, packaging, accurate menus, and whether convenience improves or degrades ordinary meals. [8] context Full Belly Foods's scale, distribution network, platform role, or local-kitchen model affects whether growth strengthens food access or turns meals into a consolidated private subscription system. [9]
Scale Integrity ? Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.	3 / 5	Full Belly Foods's scale, distribution network, platform role, or local-kitchen model affects whether growth strengthens food access or turns meals into a consolidated private subscription system. Full Belly Foods's scale, distribution network, platform role, or local-kitchen model affects whether growth strengthens food access or turns meals into a consolidated private subscription system. On Scale Integrity, Full Belly Foods belongs low because ordinary food usefulness is being delivered through shareholder, parent-company, founder, or platform control. The meal service can still help customers eat, but the institutional power mostly remains private and one-sided. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Meal-delivery expansion calibrated across worker-owned community kitchens, local farmer-supported prepared meals, plant-forward subscriptions, organic meal kits, parent-owned meal-kit brands, and food-platform consolidators. Linked evidence context Full Belly Foods's public record identifies its ownership, parent relationship, or institutional form in the meal-kit, prepared-meal, or food-delivery market. [1] context Full Belly Foods's public materials show whether control is held by workers, a cooperative kitchen, founders, a private platform, a public company, or a parent food group. [2] context Full Belly Foods's model determines whether meal value is routed through cooperative kitchens, local farmers, public-benefit food work, private subscriptions, or platform scale. [3] context Full Belly Foods's reviewed public record shows the degree to which cooks, delivery workers, farmers, chefs, or ordinary employees have binding power rather than vendor or employment dependence. [4] context Full Belly Foods's service affects access to prepared food, home cooking, disability-friendly meal support, local farmer demand, chef income, or lower-friction meal planning. [5] context Full Belly Foods's public model affects whether spoilage, missed delivery, food-safety, cancellation, packaging, and meal-selection risks are absorbed by the institution or shifted to customers and workers. [6] context Full Belly Foods operates in a market where customers often face recurring orders, changing menus, plan deadlines, delivery windows, shipping fees, and freshness uncertainty. [7] context Full Belly Foods's core product integrity depends on ingredient quality, prepared-food safety, nutritional quality, packaging, accurate menus, and whether convenience improves or degrades ordinary meals. [8] Full Belly Foods's scale, distribution network, platform role, or local-kitchen model affects whether growth strengthens food access or turns meals into a consolidated private subscription system. [9]

Penalties

Penalty	Applied	Why this penalty
High-Carbon Products ? Core products, services, financing, or supply chains that materially depend on fossil-fuel combustion, high-emissions transport, industrial animal agriculture, meat, dairy, or other unusually carbon-intensive activity. This is scored separately from general ecological harm so ordinary consumers can see carbon-intensive product exposure directly. Range: -10 to 0.	-1	Full Belly Foods's public record makes High-Carbon Products relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits. Full Belly Foods's public record makes High-Carbon Products relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits. This creates a High-Carbon Products penalty because the risk comes from how the service sells, ships, sources, personalizes, renews, packages, or governs food. The value is limited where the evidence shows ordinary category exposure rather than severe or unavoidable harm. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Meal-delivery expansion calibrated across worker-owned community kitchens, local farmer-supported prepared meals, plant-forward subscriptions, organic meal kits, parent-owned meal-kit brands, and food-platform consolidators. Linked evidence Full Belly Foods's public record makes High-Carbon Products relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits. [12]
Subscription Capture ? Manipulative recurring-payment, automatic-renewal, cancellation-friction, bundling, trial-conversion, or refund designs that profit from inertia or confusion. Range: -5 to 0.	-1	Full Belly Foods's public record makes Subscription Capture relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits. Full Belly Foods's public record makes Subscription Capture relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits. This creates a Subscription Capture penalty because the risk comes from how the service sells, ships, sources, personalizes, renews, packages, or governs food. The value is limited where the evidence shows ordinary category exposure rather than severe or unavoidable harm. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Meal-delivery expansion calibrated across worker-owned community kitchens, local farmer-supported prepared meals, plant-forward subscriptions, organic meal kits, parent-owned meal-kit brands, and food-platform consolidators. Linked evidence Full Belly Foods's public record makes Subscription Capture relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits. [13]

Bonus Credits

Bonus	Credit	Why this credit
Good Deal ? Credit for unusually fair value: durable quality, fair pricing, low lock-in, and clear customer surplus.	3 / 3	Full Belly Foods's public record makes Good Deal relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits. Full Belly Foods's public record makes Good Deal relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits. This adds Good Deal credit because the practice creates unusual food access, transparent value, local-farmer support, chef autonomy, plant-forward substitution, or lower-waste meal planning. The credit is capped where the service is still a private subscription or narrow local option. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Meal-delivery expansion calibrated across worker-owned community kitchens, local farmer-supported prepared meals, plant-forward subscriptions, organic meal kits, parent-owned meal-kit brands, and food-platform consolidators. Linked evidence Full Belly Foods's public record makes Good Deal relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits. [10]
Cost Transparency ? Credit for clear posted prices, all-in fees, unit costs, public rate cards, margin/cost visibility, or surplus-allocation transparency, especially in markets where opaque quotes, hidden fees, or individualized pricing are normal.	1 / 3	Full Belly Foods's public record makes Cost Transparency relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits. Full Belly Foods's public record makes Cost Transparency relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits. This adds Cost Transparency credit because the practice creates unusual food access, transparent value, local-farmer support, chef autonomy, plant-forward substitution, or lower-waste meal planning. The credit is capped where the service is still a private subscription or narrow local option. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Meal-delivery expansion calibrated across worker-owned community kitchens, local farmer-supported prepared meals, plant-forward subscriptions, organic meal kits, parent-owned meal-kit brands, and food-platform consolidators. Linked evidence Full Belly Foods's public record makes Cost Transparency relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits. [11]

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

High 80/100

13 verified linked claims 13 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 13/13 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 17/20

13 verified linked claims

Source quality 10/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 14/18

13 direct claims across 13 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 10/10

13/13 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending

VerificationUnverified

ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)

ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)

Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.

Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

1Full Belly Foods's public record identifies its ownership, parent relationship, or institutional form in the meal-kit, prepared-meal, or food-delivery market.

Ownership Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Full Belly Foods official siteGeneral web source · 58%

2Full Belly Foods's public materials show whether control is held by workers, a cooperative kitchen, founders, a private platform, a public company, or a parent food group.

Governance Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Full Belly Foods official siteGeneral web source · 58%

3Full Belly Foods's model determines whether meal value is routed through cooperative kitchens, local farmers, public-benefit food work, private subscriptions, or platform scale.

Extraction Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Full Belly Foods official siteGeneral web source · 58%

4Full Belly Foods's reviewed public record shows the degree to which cooks, delivery workers, farmers, chefs, or ordinary employees have binding power rather than vendor or employment dependence.

Labor Sovereignty Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Full Belly Foods programsGeneral web source · 58%

5Full Belly Foods's service affects access to prepared food, home cooking, disability-friendly meal support, local farmer demand, chef income, or lower-friction meal planning.

Solidarity Unemployed Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Full Belly Foods programsGeneral web source · 58%

6Full Belly Foods's public model affects whether spoilage, missed delivery, food-safety, cancellation, packaging, and meal-selection risks are absorbed by the institution or shifted to customers and workers.

Loss Bearing Fidelity Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Full Belly Foods programsGeneral web source · 58%

7Full Belly Foods operates in a market where customers often face recurring orders, changing menus, plan deadlines, delivery windows, shipping fees, and freshness uncertainty.

Market Conduct Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Full Belly Foods programsGeneral web source · 58%

8Full Belly Foods's core product integrity depends on ingredient quality, prepared-food safety, nutritional quality, packaging, accurate menus, and whether convenience improves or degrades ordinary meals.

Product Integrity Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Full Belly Foods official siteGeneral web source · 58%

9Full Belly Foods's scale, distribution network, platform role, or local-kitchen model affects whether growth strengthens food access or turns meals into a consolidated private subscription system.

Scale Integrity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Full Belly Foods programsGeneral web source · 58%

10Full Belly Foods's public record makes Good Deal relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits.

Good Deal Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Full Belly Foods programsGeneral web source · 58%

11Full Belly Foods's public record makes Cost Transparency relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits.

Cost Transparency Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Full Belly Foods programsGeneral web source · 58%

12Full Belly Foods's public record makes High-Carbon Products relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits.

High Carbon Products Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Full Belly Foods programsGeneral web source · 58%

13Full Belly Foods's public record makes Subscription Capture relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits.

Subscription Capture Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Full Belly Foods programsGeneral web source · 58%

Alternatives

Competitors

AGOOD61 Three Stone Hearth worker-owned community-supported kitchen · same market AGOOD60 Cheese Board Collective worker cooperative · same market AGOOD60 ChiFresh Kitchen worker-owned prepared-meal cooperative · same market AGOOD59 Alvarado Street Bakery worker-owned bakery · same market AGOOD59 Arizmendi Bakery worker cooperative bakery · same market AGOOD59 Rainbow Grocery Cooperative worker cooperative grocer · same market AGOOD58 Equal Exchange worker cooperative · same market AGOOD58 Niles Pie Company worker-owned pie shop and bakery · same market

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for Full Belly Foods Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.

View Full Audit Log