private media, magazine, newspaper, and data company

Hearst

Industry News

A private diversified media company owning newspapers, magazines, television interests, and business information services. It has real publishing assets, but private conglomerate control limits public accountability across many cultural channels.

Why this matters: Hearst combines useful journalism and magazines with private dynastic ownership, lifestyle identity capture, and limited transparency.

Letter grade D Extractive Medium confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1 Last reviewed May 8, 2026

Final Score 10* D - Extractive

DEXTRACTIVE10 pts

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material30

Bonus+1

Cap41Ownership <= 4 and Governance <= 4

After Cap31

Penalties-21

Private Government badge

Hearst receives the Private Government badge because it combines large-scale private rule-setting over customers, workers, users, members, or counterparties with OpenLobby-documented lobbying of about $2.7M on public policy issues.

Evidence: [13]

!Not Verified

Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Evaluation Overview

D - Extractive

The score turns mainly on Extraction, with the largest penalty coming from Policy Capture.

Strengths

Extraction4/10
Loss-Bearing Fidelity4/7
Product Integrity4/5

Penalties

Policy Capture-6
Reversibility-5
Ecological Harm-2
Accountability Opacity-2

Evidence state

ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Linked claims13
Direct axis claims11
Coverage11/18

Scoring Axes

Axis	Score	Why this score
Ownership ? Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.	2 / 10	Hearst is a private media company rather than a worker-, reader-, or public-interest trust. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Publishing, journalism, newspaper-chain, and author-platform expansion; calibrated against nonprofit, trust-owned, author-service, platform, and conglomerate models. Uncertainty Focused category expansion; later review should add more labor, author-contract, pricing, audience-data, and governance evidence. Linked evidence Hearst is a private media company rather than a worker-, reader-, or public-interest trust. [1] context Hearst operates newspapers, magazines, television interests, and business information products with real media value. [2] context Private dynastic ownership and lifestyle/media advertising incentives limit structural accountability. [3]
Governance ? Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.	3 / 10	Hearst is a private media company rather than a worker-, reader-, or public-interest trust. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Publishing, journalism, newspaper-chain, and author-platform expansion; calibrated against nonprofit, trust-owned, author-service, platform, and conglomerate models. Uncertainty Focused category expansion; later review should add more labor, author-contract, pricing, audience-data, and governance evidence. Linked evidence context Hearst is a private media company rather than a worker-, reader-, or public-interest trust. [1] context Hearst operates newspapers, magazines, television interests, and business information products with real media value. [2] context Private dynastic ownership and lifestyle/media advertising incentives limit structural accountability. [3]
Extraction ? Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.	4 / 10	Hearst is a private media company rather than a worker-, reader-, or public-interest trust. Hearst is a private media company rather than a worker-, reader-, or public-interest trust. That places Hearst in the middle of Extraction: the institution creates real value but still leaves room for rent extraction, unequal bargaining, or surplus capture. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Publishing, journalism, newspaper-chain, and author-platform expansion; calibrated against nonprofit, trust-owned, author-service, platform, and conglomerate models. Uncertainty Focused category expansion; later review should add more labor, author-contract, pricing, audience-data, and governance evidence. Linked evidence context Hearst is a private media company rather than a worker-, reader-, or public-interest trust. [1] context Hearst operates newspapers, magazines, television interests, and business information products with real media value. [2] context Private dynastic ownership and lifestyle/media advertising incentives limit structural accountability. [3]
Labor Sovereignty ? Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.	3 / 7	Hearst is a private media company rather than a worker-, reader-, or public-interest trust. Hearst is a private media company rather than a worker-, reader-, or public-interest trust. That places Hearst in the middle of Labor Sovereignty: workers or participants have some protection or agency, but not enough binding power to control the relationship. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Publishing, journalism, newspaper-chain, and author-platform expansion; calibrated against nonprofit, trust-owned, author-service, platform, and conglomerate models. Uncertainty Focused category expansion; later review should add more labor, author-contract, pricing, audience-data, and governance evidence. Linked evidence context Hearst is a private media company rather than a worker-, reader-, or public-interest trust. [1] context Hearst operates newspapers, magazines, television interests, and business information products with real media value. [2] context Private dynastic ownership and lifestyle/media advertising incentives limit structural accountability. [3]
Solidarity with the Unemployed ? Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.	3 / 7	Hearst is a private media company rather than a worker-, reader-, or public-interest trust. Hearst is a private media company rather than a worker-, reader-, or public-interest trust. That places Hearst in the middle of Solidarity with the Unemployed: some access, severance, retraining, openness, or mutual-aid value is present, but it is not central or durable. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Publishing, journalism, newspaper-chain, and author-platform expansion; calibrated against nonprofit, trust-owned, author-service, platform, and conglomerate models. Uncertainty Focused category expansion; later review should add more labor, author-contract, pricing, audience-data, and governance evidence. Linked evidence context Hearst is a private media company rather than a worker-, reader-, or public-interest trust. [1] context Hearst operates newspapers, magazines, television interests, and business information products with real media value. [2] context Private dynastic ownership and lifestyle/media advertising incentives limit structural accountability. [3]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity ? Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.	4 / 7	Hearst is a private media company rather than a worker-, reader-, or public-interest trust. Hearst is a private media company rather than a worker-, reader-, or public-interest trust. That places Hearst in the middle of Loss-Bearing Fidelity: there is some willingness to preserve obligations, but the record still leaves meaningful risk-shifting concerns. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Publishing, journalism, newspaper-chain, and author-platform expansion; calibrated against nonprofit, trust-owned, author-service, platform, and conglomerate models. Uncertainty Focused category expansion; later review should add more labor, author-contract, pricing, audience-data, and governance evidence. Linked evidence context Hearst is a private media company rather than a worker-, reader-, or public-interest trust. [1] context Hearst operates newspapers, magazines, television interests, and business information products with real media value. [2] context Private dynastic ownership and lifestyle/media advertising incentives limit structural accountability. [3]
Market Conduct ? Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.	3 / 5	Hearst is a private media company rather than a worker-, reader-, or public-interest trust. Hearst is a private media company rather than a worker-, reader-, or public-interest trust. That places Hearst in the middle of Market Conduct: the product has real value but still uses meaningful lock-in, gatekeeping, market power, or dependency. The value stays below the top tier because the linked record does not show full democratic control, non-extractive lock-in, or complete stakeholder protection on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Publishing, journalism, newspaper-chain, and author-platform expansion; calibrated against nonprofit, trust-owned, author-service, platform, and conglomerate models. Uncertainty Focused category expansion; later review should add more labor, author-contract, pricing, audience-data, and governance evidence. Linked evidence context Hearst is a private media company rather than a worker-, reader-, or public-interest trust. [1] context Hearst operates newspapers, magazines, television interests, and business information products with real media value. [2] context Private dynastic ownership and lifestyle/media advertising incentives limit structural accountability. [3]
Product Integrity ? Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.	4 / 5	Hearst operates newspapers, magazines, television interests, and business information products with real media value. Hearst operates newspapers, magazines, television interests, and business information products with real media value. That places Hearst high on Product Integrity: the core offering is genuinely useful and comparatively less dependent on traps, degradation, or harmful dependencies. A still-higher or maximum value requires stronger proof that this structure is durable, broad, and not merely discretionary. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Publishing, journalism, newspaper-chain, and author-platform expansion; calibrated against nonprofit, trust-owned, author-service, platform, and conglomerate models. Uncertainty Focused category expansion; later review should add more labor, author-contract, pricing, audience-data, and governance evidence. Linked evidence context Hearst is a private media company rather than a worker-, reader-, or public-interest trust. [1] Hearst operates newspapers, magazines, television interests, and business information products with real media value. [2] context Private dynastic ownership and lifestyle/media advertising incentives limit structural accountability. [3]
Scale Integrity ? Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.	4 / 5	Hearst is a private media company rather than a worker-, reader-, or public-interest trust. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Publishing, journalism, newspaper-chain, and author-platform expansion; calibrated against nonprofit, trust-owned, author-service, platform, and conglomerate models. Uncertainty Focused category expansion; later review should add more labor, author-contract, pricing, audience-data, and governance evidence. Linked evidence context Hearst is a private media company rather than a worker-, reader-, or public-interest trust. [1] context Hearst operates newspapers, magazines, television interests, and business information products with real media value. [2] context Private dynastic ownership and lifestyle/media advertising incentives limit structural accountability. [3]

Penalties

Penalty	Applied	Why this penalty
Reversibility ? Applied when positive conduct depends on current living leaders, founders, family owners, or other person-contingent governance rather than durable structure. Range: -5 to 0.	-5	Goodness depends on private ownership and executive decisions. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Publishing, journalism, newspaper-chain, and author-platform expansion; calibrated against nonprofit, trust-owned, author-service, platform, and conglomerate models. Uncertainty Focused category expansion; later review should add more labor, author-contract, pricing, audience-data, and governance evidence. Linked evidence Goodness depends on private ownership and executive decisions. [5]
Human Harm ? Severity, scale, culpability, vulnerable targets, willful reoffense, reputation laundering, pattern escalation, and time decay. Range: -20 to 0.	-1	News and lifestyle media can shape public understanding and status pressure. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Publishing, journalism, newspaper-chain, and author-platform expansion; calibrated against nonprofit, trust-owned, author-service, platform, and conglomerate models. Uncertainty Focused category expansion; later review should add more labor, author-contract, pricing, audience-data, and governance evidence. Linked evidence News and lifestyle media can shape public understanding and status pressure. [6]
Ecological Harm ? Footprint, trajectory, irreversibility, culpability, and scale, including whether ecological harm is central to the model and continued after credible notice. Range: -30 to 0.	-2	Print magazines, newspapers, and digital operations create paper and infrastructure impacts. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Publishing, journalism, newspaper-chain, and author-platform expansion; calibrated against nonprofit, trust-owned, author-service, platform, and conglomerate models. Uncertainty Focused category expansion; later review should add more labor, author-contract, pricing, audience-data, and governance evidence. Linked evidence Print magazines, newspapers, and digital operations create paper and infrastructure impacts. [7]
Policy Capture ? Private-interest attempts to bend law, regulation, subsidies, taxes, enforcement, trade, labor, safety, competition, environmental, healthcare, housing, surveillance, civil-liberties, or consumer policy against workers, customers, citizens, affected communities, or ecological life. Public-interest advocacy is not penalized merely because it is lobbying. Range: -15 to 0.	-6	OpenLobby records HEARST CORPORATION lobbying on consumer product safety, PHA, healthcare, MIA, communications, law enforcement, and other issues with about $2.7M in spending across 32… OpenLobby records HEARST CORPORATION lobbying on consumer product safety, PHA, healthcare, MIA, communications, law enforcement, and other issues with about $2.7M in spending across 32 filings; the reviewed filings document private institutional lobbying over public rules rather than a public-interest advocacy role. That warrants a substantial Policy Capture penalty because private institutional pressure is being applied to public rules while affected people cannot democratically govern that agenda. The value is substantial but not at the floor because the linked record shows serious conduct without the strongest aggravating factors on this axis. Linked evidence OpenLobby records HEARST CORPORATION lobbying on consumer product safety, PHA, healthcare, MIA, communications, law enforcement, and other issues with about $2.7M in spending across 32 filings; the reviewed filings document private institutional lobbying over public rules rather than a public-interest advocacy role. [12]
Accountability Opacity ? Material opacity, reputation laundering, or hidden accountability structures that prevent public accountability. Range: -2 to 0.	-2	Private ownership makes economics and governance opaque. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Publishing, journalism, newspaper-chain, and author-platform expansion; calibrated against nonprofit, trust-owned, author-service, platform, and conglomerate models. Uncertainty Focused category expansion; later review should add more labor, author-contract, pricing, audience-data, and governance evidence. Linked evidence Private ownership makes economics and governance opaque. [8]
Identity Capture ? Customer pressure, employee pressure, and pervasive identity saturation. Range: -3 to 0.	-2	Lifestyle magazines and media brands strongly monetize identity and aspiration. Lifestyle magazines and media brands strongly monetize identity and aspiration. That warrants a substantial Identity Capture penalty because users, workers, customers, or publics are pressured into identity attachment that protects institutional power. The value is substantial but not at the floor because the linked record shows serious conduct without the strongest aggravating factors on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Publishing, journalism, newspaper-chain, and author-platform expansion; calibrated against nonprofit, trust-owned, author-service, platform, and conglomerate models. Uncertainty Focused category expansion; later review should add more labor, author-contract, pricing, audience-data, and governance evidence. Linked evidence Lifestyle magazines and media brands strongly monetize identity and aspiration. [9]
Surveillance Capture ? Invasive surveillance, unreasonably non-optional tracking, facial recognition, biometric identification, or AI behavior scanning of customers, workers, bystanders, or the public. Range: -5 to 0.	-1	Digital media advertising involves reader tracking. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Publishing, journalism, newspaper-chain, and author-platform expansion; calibrated against nonprofit, trust-owned, author-service, platform, and conglomerate models. Uncertainty Focused category expansion; later review should add more labor, author-contract, pricing, audience-data, and governance evidence. Linked evidence Digital media advertising involves reader tracking. [10]
Ideological Disavowal ? Concealed ideology presented as neutrality, expertise, professional necessity, public-service administration, market inevitability, or non-ideological common sense while exercising power. Range: -3 to 0.	-2	Hearst's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Hearst exercises meaningful institutional or cultural power while strongly presenting contested choices as… Hearst's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Hearst exercises meaningful institutional or cultural power while strongly presenting contested choices as neutral expertise, safety, objectivity, professionalism, administrative necessity, or public service. That warrants a substantial Ideological Disavowal penalty because the institution presents situated, contested choices as neutrality, expertise, inevitability, safety, or common sense. The value is substantial but not at the floor because the linked record shows serious conduct without the strongest aggravating factors on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Ideological Disavowal 0 to -3 recalibration: 0 for explicit standpoint or no penalty-level neutrality theater; -1 for bounded softening of contested choices; -2 for strong neutrality theater by a powerful institution; -3 for major gatekeeping or coercive power presented as neutral, necessary, objective, or non-ideological. Uncertainty This recalibration uses public self-presentation and profile evidence; later review should add direct language-analysis evidence for high-impact institutions. Linked evidence Hearst's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Hearst exercises meaningful institutional or cultural power while strongly presenting contested choices as neutral expertise, safety, objectivity, professionalism, administrative necessity, or public service. [11]

Bonus Credits

Bonus	Credit	Why this credit
Good Deal ? Credit for unusually fair value: durable quality, fair pricing, low lock-in, and clear customer surplus.	1 / 3	Some Hearst journalism and service publishing provides durable reader value. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Publishing, journalism, newspaper-chain, and author-platform expansion; calibrated against nonprofit, trust-owned, author-service, platform, and conglomerate models. Uncertainty Focused category expansion; later review should add more labor, author-contract, pricing, audience-data, and governance evidence. Linked evidence Some Hearst journalism and service publishing provides durable reader value. [4]

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

Medium 68/100

12 verified linked claims 11 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 11/18 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 14/20

12 verified linked claims

Source quality 10/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 9/18

11 direct claims across 18 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 6/10

11/18 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending

VerificationUnverified

ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)

ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)

Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.

Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

1Hearst is a private media company rather than a worker-, reader-, or public-interest trust.

Ownership Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 8, 2026

AI scaffold

HearstGeneral web source · 58%
Hearst businessesGeneral web source · 58%

2Hearst operates newspapers, magazines, television interests, and business information products with real media value.

Product Integrity Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 8, 2026

AI scaffold

HearstGeneral web source · 58%
Hearst businessesGeneral web source · 58%

3Private dynastic ownership and lifestyle/media advertising incentives limit structural accountability.

Calculation Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 8, 2026

AI scaffold

HearstGeneral web source · 58%
Hearst businessesGeneral web source · 58%

4Some Hearst journalism and service publishing provides durable reader value.

Good Deal Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 8, 2026

AI scaffold

HearstGeneral web source · 58%
Hearst businessesGeneral web source · 58%

5Goodness depends on private ownership and executive decisions.

Reversibility Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 8, 2026

AI scaffold

HearstGeneral web source · 58%
Hearst businessesGeneral web source · 58%

6News and lifestyle media can shape public understanding and status pressure.

Human Harm Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 8, 2026

AI scaffold

HearstGeneral web source · 58%
Hearst businessesGeneral web source · 58%

7Print magazines, newspapers, and digital operations create paper and infrastructure impacts.

Ecological Harm Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 8, 2026

AI scaffold

HearstGeneral web source · 58%
Hearst businessesGeneral web source · 58%

8Private ownership makes economics and governance opaque.

Accountability Opacity Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 8, 2026

AI scaffold

HearstGeneral web source · 58%
Hearst businessesGeneral web source · 58%

9Lifestyle magazines and media brands strongly monetize identity and aspiration.

Identity Capture Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 8, 2026

AI scaffold

HearstGeneral web source · 58%
Hearst businessesGeneral web source · 58%

10Digital media advertising involves reader tracking.

Surveillance Capture Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 8, 2026

AI scaffold

HearstGeneral web source · 58%
Hearst businessesGeneral web source · 58%

11Hearst's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Hearst exercises meaningful institutional or cultural power while strongly presenting contested choices as neutral expertise, safety, objectivity, professionalism, administrative necessity, or public service.

Ideological Disavowal Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 9, 2026

AI scaffold

Hearst official siteGeneral web source · 58%
Hearst businessesGeneral web source · 58%

12OpenLobby records HEARST CORPORATION lobbying on consumer product safety, PHA, healthcare, MIA, communications, law enforcement, and other issues with about $2.7M in spending across 32 filings; the reviewed filings document private institutional lobbying over public rules rather than a public-interest advocacy role.

Policy Capture Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

OpenLobby — HEARST CORPORATION lobbying profileGeneral web source · 58%

13Hearst receives the Private Government badge because it combines large-scale private rule-setting over customers, workers, users, members, or counterparties with OpenLobby-documented lobbying of about $2.7M on public policy issues.

Private Government Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

OpenLobby — HEARST CORPORATION lobbying profileGeneral web source · 58%

Alternatives

Competitors

AGOOD55 ProPublica nonprofit investigative newsroom · same market BQUALIFIED45 The Guardian trust-owned news organization · same market BQUALIFIED43 Associated Press nonprofit news cooperative · same market BQUALIFIED43 NPR nonprofit public-radio news network · same market CPERFORMATIVE40 BBC public-service broadcaster · same market DEXTRACTIVE34 Reuters global news agency · same market DEXTRACTIVE33 Financial Times business newspaper and digital news organization · same market DEXTRACTIVE28 The Economist Group magazine and business-intelligence publisher · same market

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for Hearst Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.

View Full Audit Log