climate-denial think tank

Heartland Institute

A free-market policy nonprofit known for climate-change denial and anti-regulatory environmental advocacy, alongside work on taxes, education, health, and energy. Heartland Institute scores low because of ecological harm, documented human harm, and youth capture, with poor loss-bearing fidelity and weak worker power reinforcing the negative evaluation.

Why this matters: Heartland is a severe calibration case for harmful advocacy: the product is not pollution itself, but organized climate-denial and anti-regulatory influence.

Letter grade F Malignant High confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1 Last reviewed May 7, 2026

Final Score -24* F - Malignant

FMALIGNANT-24 pts

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material8

Bonus+1

Cap35Ownership <= 2 and Governance <= 2

After Cap9

Penalties-33

Private Government badge

Heartland Institute receives PG because it functions as a private policy engine: donor and staff priorities are converted into public-rule pressure without accountability to the people and ecosystems affected.

Evidence: [17]

Policy Capture: L for Lobbying

The L badge appears when the Policy Capture penalty is severe. Here, L stands for Lobbying: the policy-capture value is -10, meaning the evidence indicates major private-interest lobbying or policy pressure against workers, customers, citizens, affected communities, democratic accountability, or ecological life.

Evidence: [16]

!Not Verified

Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Evaluation Overview

F - Malignant

The score turns mainly on Ownership, with the largest penalty coming from Ecological Harm.

Strengths

Ownership2/10
Governance2/10
Extraction2/10

Penalties

Ecological Harm-12
Policy Capture-10
Human Harm-5
Youth Capture-3

Evidence state

ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessExhaustive (AI)
Linked claims17
Direct axis claims16
Coverage16/16

Scoring Axes

Axis	Score	Why this score
Ownership ? Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.	2 / 10	Heartland Institute is a nonprofit think tank rather than a shareholder-owned company, but control remains board, donor, and staff driven. Heartland Institute is a nonprofit think tank rather than a shareholder-owned company, but control remains board, donor, and staff driven. That keeps Heartland Institute low on Ownership: decisive control remains with shareholders, private owners, executives, or state insiders rather than affected people. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Environmental advocacy and stewardship expansion; comparative column calibration should be revisited in the next full-axis pass. Uncertainty This is a tentative public-evidence judgment; a full review should examine donor influence, lobbying records, and counterevidence in more depth. Linked evidence Heartland Institute is a nonprofit think tank rather than a shareholder-owned company, but control remains board, donor, and staff driven. [1]
Governance ? Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.	2 / 10	Heartland publishes a free-market policy mission without affected-community governance over its climate and environmental agenda. Heartland publishes a free-market policy mission without affected-community governance over its climate and environmental agenda. That keeps Heartland Institute low on Governance: ordinary users, workers, customers, or affected communities cannot change the rules that govern them. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Environmental advocacy and stewardship expansion; comparative column calibration should be revisited in the next full-axis pass. Uncertainty This is a tentative public-evidence judgment; a full review should examine donor influence, lobbying records, and counterevidence in more depth. Linked evidence Heartland publishes a free-market policy mission without affected-community governance over its climate and environmental agenda. [2]
Extraction ? Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.	2 / 10	Heartland advocacy tends to shield industry and donors from public environmental constraint rather than reduce extraction. Heartland advocacy tends to shield industry and donors from public environmental constraint rather than reduce extraction. That keeps Heartland Institute low on Extraction: the business model makes extraction from workers, users, suppliers, customers, or the public central rather than incidental. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Environmental advocacy and stewardship expansion; comparative column calibration should be revisited in the next full-axis pass. Uncertainty This is a tentative public-evidence judgment; a full review should examine donor influence, lobbying records, and counterevidence in more depth. Linked evidence Heartland advocacy tends to shield industry and donors from public environmental constraint rather than reduce extraction. [3] context Heartland Institute is a nonprofit think tank rather than a shareholder-owned company, but control remains board, donor, and staff driven. [1] context Heartland publishes a free-market policy mission without affected-community governance over its climate and environmental agenda. [2]
Labor Sovereignty ? Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.	1 / 7	Heartland is a professional policy nonprofit with no evidence of worker governance. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Environmental advocacy and stewardship expansion; comparative column calibration should be revisited in the next full-axis pass. Uncertainty This is a tentative public-evidence judgment; a full review should examine donor influence, lobbying records, and counterevidence in more depth. Linked evidence Heartland is a professional policy nonprofit with no evidence of worker governance. [4] context Heartland Institute is a nonprofit think tank rather than a shareholder-owned company, but control remains board, donor, and staff driven. [1] context Heartland publishes a free-market policy mission without affected-community governance over its climate and environmental agenda. [2]
Solidarity with the Unemployed ? Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.	0 / 7	Heartland climate and regulatory positions do not expand security for people outside stable employment and can weaken public protections. Heartland climate and regulatory positions do not expand security for people outside stable employment and can weaken public protections. That keeps Heartland Institute low on Solidarity with the Unemployed: the model provides little protection for people who leave, are excluded, or cannot bargain from employment. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Environmental advocacy and stewardship expansion; comparative column calibration should be revisited in the next full-axis pass. Uncertainty This is a tentative public-evidence judgment; a full review should examine donor influence, lobbying records, and counterevidence in more depth. Linked evidence Heartland climate and regulatory positions do not expand security for people outside stable employment and can weaken public protections. [5] context Heartland Institute is a nonprofit think tank rather than a shareholder-owned company, but control remains board, donor, and staff driven. [1] context Heartland publishes a free-market policy mission without affected-community governance over its climate and environmental agenda. [2]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity ? Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.	0 / 7	Heartland climate advocacy shifts environmental risk toward the public rather than making emitters bear costs. Heartland climate advocacy shifts environmental risk toward the public rather than making emitters bear costs. That keeps Heartland Institute low on Loss-Bearing Fidelity: losses, hazards, or adjustment costs are routinely pushed onto workers, customers, suppliers, communities, or the public. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Environmental advocacy and stewardship expansion; comparative column calibration should be revisited in the next full-axis pass. Uncertainty This is a tentative public-evidence judgment; a full review should examine donor influence, lobbying records, and counterevidence in more depth. Linked evidence Heartland climate advocacy shifts environmental risk toward the public rather than making emitters bear costs. [6] context Heartland Institute is a nonprofit think tank rather than a shareholder-owned company, but control remains board, donor, and staff driven. [1] context Heartland publishes a free-market policy mission without affected-community governance over its climate and environmental agenda. [2]
Market Conduct ? Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.	1 / 5	Heartland generally favors deregulation and market freedom over binding public constraints on polluters. Heartland generally favors deregulation and market freedom over binding public constraints on polluters. That keeps Heartland Institute low on Market Conduct: market power, lock-in, coercive pricing, or exclusionary conduct is a major part of the institution's position. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Environmental advocacy and stewardship expansion; comparative column calibration should be revisited in the next full-axis pass. Uncertainty This is a tentative public-evidence judgment; a full review should examine donor influence, lobbying records, and counterevidence in more depth. Linked evidence Heartland generally favors deregulation and market freedom over binding public constraints on polluters. [7] context Heartland Institute is a nonprofit think tank rather than a shareholder-owned company, but control remains board, donor, and staff driven. [1] context Heartland publishes a free-market policy mission without affected-community governance over its climate and environmental agenda. [2]
Product Integrity ? Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.	0 / 5	Heartland policy output is severely weakened by climate-denial evidence and anti-regulatory environmental advocacy. Heartland policy output is severely weakened by climate-denial evidence and anti-regulatory environmental advocacy. That keeps Heartland Institute low on Product Integrity: the core offering is closely tied to harmful, addictive, deceptive, degrading, or low-integrity product design. The value is above zero only where the linked record still shows some real function, constraint, or public value on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Environmental advocacy and stewardship expansion; comparative column calibration should be revisited in the next full-axis pass. Uncertainty This is a tentative public-evidence judgment; a full review should examine donor influence, lobbying records, and counterevidence in more depth. Linked evidence Heartland policy output is severely weakened by climate-denial evidence and anti-regulatory environmental advocacy. [8] context Heartland Institute is a nonprofit think tank rather than a shareholder-owned company, but control remains board, donor, and staff driven. [1] context Heartland publishes a free-market policy mission without affected-community governance over its climate and environmental agenda. [2]
Scale Integrity ? Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.	0 / 5	Scaling Heartland influence would amplify climate-delay and deregulatory harm. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Environmental advocacy and stewardship expansion; comparative column calibration should be revisited in the next full-axis pass. Uncertainty This is a tentative public-evidence judgment; a full review should examine donor influence, lobbying records, and counterevidence in more depth. Linked evidence Scaling Heartland influence would amplify climate-delay and deregulatory harm. [9] context Heartland Institute is a nonprofit think tank rather than a shareholder-owned company, but control remains board, donor, and staff driven. [1] context Heartland publishes a free-market policy mission without affected-community governance over its climate and environmental agenda. [2]

Penalties

Penalty	Applied	Why this penalty
Human Harm ? Severity, scale, culpability, vulnerable targets, willful reoffense, reputation laundering, pattern escalation, and time decay. Range: -20 to 0.	-5	Heartland Institute has conduct relevant to Human Harm: ecological and regulatory obstruction can foreseeably increase public health, climate, or community harm. Heartland Institute has conduct relevant to Human Harm: ecological and regulatory obstruction can foreseeably increase public health, climate, or community harm. That warrants a limited Human Harm penalty because ordinary operation, documented misconduct, or institutional power creates serious injury, deprivation, abuse, or foreseeable human damage. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Environmental advocacy and stewardship expansion; comparative column calibration should be revisited in the next full-axis pass. Linked evidence Heartland Institute has conduct relevant to Human Harm: ecological and regulatory obstruction can foreseeably increase public health, climate, or community harm. [11]
Ecological Harm ? Footprint, trajectory, irreversibility, culpability, and scale, including whether ecological harm is central to the model and continued after credible notice. Range: -30 to 0.	-12	DeSmog and Greenpeace identify Heartland as a major climate-denial and anti-climate-policy organization. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Environmental advocacy and stewardship expansion; comparative column calibration should be revisited in the next full-axis pass. Linked evidence DeSmog and Greenpeace identify Heartland as a major climate-denial and anti-climate-policy organization. [12]
Policy Capture ? Private-interest attempts to bend law, regulation, subsidies, taxes, enforcement, trade, labor, safety, competition, environmental, healthcare, housing, surveillance, civil-liberties, or consumer policy against workers, customers, citizens, affected communities, or ecological life. Public-interest advocacy is not penalized merely because it is lobbying. Range: -15 to 0.	-10	Heartland Institute retains conduct relevant to the Policy Capture penalty: existing verified evidence links its policy work to climate-denial and anti-climate-regulation advocacy that would shift ecological and public-health costs outward. Heartland Institute retains conduct relevant to the Policy Capture penalty: existing verified evidence links its policy work to climate-denial and anti-climate-regulation advocacy that would shift ecological and public-health costs outward. That warrants a substantial Policy Capture penalty because private institutional pressure is being applied to public rules while affected people cannot democratically govern that agenda. The value is substantial but not at the floor because the linked record shows serious conduct without the strongest aggravating factors on this axis. Linked evidence Heartland Institute retains conduct relevant to the Policy Capture penalty: existing verified evidence links its policy work to climate-denial and anti-climate-regulation advocacy that would shift ecological and public-health costs outward. [16]
Youth Capture ? Manipulative youth-directed marketing, youth-data or attention monetization, collectible/add-on traps, parasocial or identity capture, surprise mechanics, or treating young people as lower-disclosure consumers. Making useful toys or welcoming children is not itself penalized. Range: -5 to 0.	-3	Greenpeace describes Heartland-linked climate materials aimed at school curricula, describes conduct considered under Youth Capture climate-denial education outreach. Greenpeace describes Heartland-linked climate materials aimed at school curricula, describes conduct considered under Youth Capture climate-denial education outreach. That warrants a substantial Youth Capture penalty because young people are treated as manipulable consumers, data sources, attention targets, or culture markets. The value is substantial but not at the floor because the linked record shows serious conduct without the strongest aggravating factors on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Environmental advocacy and stewardship expansion; comparative column calibration should be revisited in the next full-axis pass. Linked evidence Greenpeace describes Heartland-linked climate materials aimed at school curricula, describes conduct considered under Youth Capture climate-denial education outreach. [13]
Accountability Opacity ? Material opacity, reputation laundering, or hidden accountability structures that prevent public accountability. Range: -2 to 0.	-2	Heartland Institute has conduct relevant to Accountability Opacity: the public-facing position materially obscures climate or ecological accountability. Heartland Institute has conduct relevant to Accountability Opacity: the public-facing position materially obscures climate or ecological accountability. That warrants a severe Accountability Opacity penalty because material facts, risks, conflicts, ownership, or accountability information are obscured from the public. The value is near the floor because the conduct appears central, large-scale, repeated, or institutionally powerful rather than incidental. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Environmental advocacy and stewardship expansion; comparative column calibration should be revisited in the next full-axis pass. Linked evidence Heartland Institute has conduct relevant to Accountability Opacity: the public-facing position materially obscures climate or ecological accountability. [14]
Ideological Disavowal ? Concealed ideology presented as neutrality, expertise, professional necessity, public-service administration, market inevitability, or non-ideological common sense while exercising power. Range: -3 to 0.	-1	Heartland Institute's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Heartland Institute shows bounded neutrality theater: some contested choices are softened through… Heartland Institute's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Heartland Institute shows bounded neutrality theater: some contested choices are softened through expertise, public-interest, professional, market, safety, or institutional language, but the record does not show dominant concealment of. That warrants a limited Ideological Disavowal penalty because the institution presents situated, contested choices as neutrality, expertise, inevitability, safety, or common sense. The value is limited because the linked record shows a real problem but not one that dominates the profile on this axis. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Ideological Disavowal 0 to -3 recalibration: 0 for explicit standpoint or no penalty-level neutrality theater; -1 for bounded softening of contested choices; -2 for strong neutrality theater by a powerful institution; -3 for major gatekeeping or coercive power presented as neutral, necessary, objective, or non-ideological. Uncertainty This recalibration uses public self-presentation and profile evidence; later review should add direct language-analysis evidence for high-impact institutions. Linked evidence Heartland Institute's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Heartland Institute shows bounded neutrality theater: some contested choices are softened through expertise, public-interest, professional, market, safety, or institutional language, but the record does not show dominant concealment of standpoint. [15]

Bonus Credits

Bonus	Credit	Why this credit
Openness to Dissent ? Credit for tolerating internal, user, customer, worker, and public dissent without retaliation, capture, or viewpoint laundering.	1 / 3	Heartland Institute the organization creates or protects dissent against concentrated institutional or industrial power. Heartland Institute the organization creates or protects dissent against concentrated institutional or industrial power. That supports partial Openness to Dissent credit because people can criticize, dissent, or challenge the institution without being managed into silence. The value remains partial because the linked record does not show the practice as comprehensive, durable, or central enough for full credit. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Environmental advocacy and stewardship expansion; comparative column calibration should be revisited in the next full-axis pass. Linked evidence Heartland Institute the organization creates or protects dissent against concentrated institutional or industrial power. [10]

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

High 80/100

16 verified linked claims 16 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 16/16 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 15/20

16 verified linked claims

Source quality 12/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 14/18

16 direct claims across 16 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 10/10

16/16 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending

VerificationUnverified

ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)

ThoroughnessExhaustive (AI)

Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.

Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

1Heartland Institute is a nonprofit think tank rather than a shareholder-owned company, but control remains board, donor, and staff driven.

Ownership Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 7, 2026

AI scaffold

Heartland Institute aboutOfficial self-description · 68%
Heartland environment and energyGeneral web source · 58%
Heartland Institute - DeSmogGeneral web source · 58%
Greenpeace Heartland Institute profileGeneral web source · 58%

2Heartland publishes a free-market policy mission without affected-community governance over its climate and environmental agenda.

Governance Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 7, 2026

AI scaffold

Heartland Institute aboutOfficial self-description · 68%
Heartland environment and energyGeneral web source · 58%
Heartland Institute - DeSmogGeneral web source · 58%
Greenpeace Heartland Institute profileGeneral web source · 58%

3Heartland advocacy tends to shield industry and donors from public environmental constraint rather than reduce extraction.

Extraction Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 7, 2026

AI scaffold

Heartland Institute aboutOfficial self-description · 68%
Heartland environment and energyGeneral web source · 58%
Heartland Institute - DeSmogGeneral web source · 58%
Greenpeace Heartland Institute profileGeneral web source · 58%

4Heartland is a professional policy nonprofit with no evidence of worker governance.

Labor Sovereignty Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 7, 2026

AI scaffold

Heartland Institute aboutOfficial self-description · 68%
Heartland environment and energyGeneral web source · 58%
Heartland Institute - DeSmogGeneral web source · 58%
Greenpeace Heartland Institute profileGeneral web source · 58%

5Heartland climate and regulatory positions do not expand security for people outside stable employment and can weaken public protections.

Solidarity Unemployed Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 7, 2026

AI scaffold

Heartland Institute aboutOfficial self-description · 68%
Heartland environment and energyGeneral web source · 58%
Heartland Institute - DeSmogGeneral web source · 58%
Greenpeace Heartland Institute profileGeneral web source · 58%

6Heartland climate advocacy shifts environmental risk toward the public rather than making emitters bear costs.

Loss Bearing Fidelity Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 7, 2026

AI scaffold

Heartland Institute aboutOfficial self-description · 68%
Heartland environment and energyGeneral web source · 58%
Heartland Institute - DeSmogGeneral web source · 58%
Greenpeace Heartland Institute profileGeneral web source · 58%

7Heartland generally favors deregulation and market freedom over binding public constraints on polluters.

Market Conduct Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 7, 2026

AI scaffold

Heartland Institute aboutOfficial self-description · 68%
Heartland environment and energyGeneral web source · 58%
Heartland Institute - DeSmogGeneral web source · 58%
Greenpeace Heartland Institute profileGeneral web source · 58%

8Heartland policy output is severely weakened by climate-denial evidence and anti-regulatory environmental advocacy.

Product Integrity Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 7, 2026

AI scaffold

Heartland Institute aboutOfficial self-description · 68%
Heartland environment and energyGeneral web source · 58%
Heartland Institute - DeSmogGeneral web source · 58%
Greenpeace Heartland Institute profileGeneral web source · 58%

9Scaling Heartland influence would amplify climate-delay and deregulatory harm.

Scale Integrity Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 7, 2026

AI scaffold

Heartland Institute aboutOfficial self-description · 68%
Heartland environment and energyGeneral web source · 58%
Heartland Institute - DeSmogGeneral web source · 58%
Greenpeace Heartland Institute profileGeneral web source · 58%

10Heartland Institute the organization creates or protects dissent against concentrated institutional or industrial power.

Openness To Dissent Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 7, 2026

AI scaffold

Heartland Institute aboutOfficial self-description · 68%
Heartland environment and energyGeneral web source · 58%
Heartland Institute - DeSmogGeneral web source · 58%
Greenpeace Heartland Institute profileGeneral web source · 58%

11Heartland Institute has conduct relevant to Human Harm: ecological and regulatory obstruction can foreseeably increase public health, climate, or community harm.

Human Harm Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 7, 2026

AI scaffold

Heartland Institute aboutOfficial self-description · 68%
Heartland environment and energyGeneral web source · 58%
Heartland Institute - DeSmogGeneral web source · 58%
Greenpeace Heartland Institute profileGeneral web source · 58%

12DeSmog and Greenpeace identify Heartland as a major climate-denial and anti-climate-policy organization.

Ecological Harm Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 7, 2026

AI scaffold

Heartland Institute aboutOfficial self-description · 68%
Heartland environment and energyGeneral web source · 58%
Heartland Institute - DeSmogGeneral web source · 58%
Greenpeace Heartland Institute profileGeneral web source · 58%

13Greenpeace describes Heartland-linked climate materials aimed at school curricula, describes conduct considered under Youth Capture climate-denial education outreach.

Youth Capture Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 7, 2026

AI scaffold

Heartland Institute aboutOfficial self-description · 68%
Heartland environment and energyGeneral web source · 58%
Heartland Institute - DeSmogGeneral web source · 58%
Greenpeace Heartland Institute profileGeneral web source · 58%

14Heartland Institute has conduct relevant to Accountability Opacity: the public-facing position materially obscures climate or ecological accountability.

Accountability Opacity Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 7, 2026

AI scaffold

Heartland Institute aboutOfficial self-description · 68%
Heartland environment and energyGeneral web source · 58%
Heartland Institute - DeSmogGeneral web source · 58%
Greenpeace Heartland Institute profileGeneral web source · 58%

15Heartland Institute's public framing is assessed as ideological-disavowal evidence because Heartland Institute shows bounded neutrality theater: some contested choices are softened through expertise, public-interest, professional, market, safety, or institutional language, but the record does not show dominant concealment of standpoint.

Ideological Disavowal Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 9, 2026

AI scaffold

Heartland Institute official siteGeneral web source · 58%
Heartland Institute aboutOfficial self-description · 68%
Heartland environment and energyGeneral web source · 58%

16Heartland Institute retains conduct relevant to the Policy Capture penalty: existing verified evidence links its policy work to climate-denial and anti-climate-regulation advocacy that would shift ecological and public-health costs outward.

Policy Capture Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

Heartland Institute aboutOfficial self-description · 68%
Heartland environment and energyGeneral web source · 58%
Heartland Institute - DeSmogGeneral web source · 58%
Greenpeace Heartland Institute profileGeneral web source · 58%

17Heartland Institute receives PG because it functions as a private policy engine: donor and staff priorities are converted into public-rule pressure without accountability to the people and ecosystems affected.

Private Government Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending May 11, 2026

AI scaffold

Heartland Institute aboutOfficial self-description · 68%
Heartland environment and energyGeneral web source · 58%
Heartland Institute - DeSmogGeneral web source · 58%
Greenpeace Heartland Institute profileGeneral web source · 58%

Alternatives

Competitors

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for Heartland Institute Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

May 7, 2026 at 12:00 AM UTC ai-scaffolding environmental-advocacy-expansion

Added tentative claim-backed evaluation during environmental advocacy, land-stewardship, and anti-environment comparison expansion pass.

View Full Audit Log