global meatpacking company
JBS
Industry Food
One of the world’s largest meat companies, with beef, poultry, pork, and prepared-food operations across multiple countries. JBS scores low because of documented human harm, ecological harm, and toxic or materially harmful products, with centralized governance and weak worker power reinforcing the negative evaluation.
Why this matters: JBS is among the worst food actors because meatpacking scale, Amazon-linked cattle risk, labor-abuse allegations, and animal-agriculture harms are all core to the business model.
Letter grade F Malignant Medium confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1
* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.
Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.
Evaluation Overview
F - Malignant
The score turns mainly on Extraction, with the largest penalty coming from Ecological Harm.
Strengths
- Extraction2/10
- Market Conduct2/5
- Product Integrity2/5
Penalties
- Ecological Harm-14
- Human Harm-10
- High-Carbon Products-7
- Toxic Products-4
Evidence state
- ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)
- ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
- Linked claims8
- Direct axis claims8
- Coverage8/15
Scoring Axes
| Axis | Score | Why this score |
|---|---|---|
Ownership
?
Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control
at 10.
|
1 / 10 |
JBS is a large meatpacking group with public-market and controlling-family features rather than stakeholder-democratic food governance. Linked evidence
|
Governance
?
Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic
stakeholder control at 10.
|
1 / 10 |
JBS is a large meatpacking group with public-market and controlling-family features rather than stakeholder-democratic food governance. Linked evidence
|
Extraction
?
Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured
extraction judgment.
|
2 / 10 |
JBS is a large meatpacking group with public-market and controlling-family features rather than stakeholder-democratic food governance. Linked evidence
|
Labor Sovereignty
?
Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at
7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence
shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling,
retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of
worker voice, or extreme turnover.
|
1 / 7 |
JBS is a large meatpacking group with public-market and controlling-family features rather than stakeholder-democratic food governance. Linked evidence
|
Solidarity with the
Unemployed
?
Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment,
and non-competes.
|
1 / 7 |
JBS is a large meatpacking group with public-market and controlling-family features rather than stakeholder-democratic food governance. Linked evidence
|
Loss-Bearing Fidelity
?
Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and
public obligations.
|
1 / 7 |
JBS is a large meatpacking group with public-market and controlling-family features rather than stakeholder-democratic food governance. Linked evidence
|
Market Conduct
?
Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.
|
2 / 5 |
JBS sells beef, poultry, pork, and prepared foods at global scale, making industrial animal-protein production its core product category. Linked evidence
|
Product Integrity
?
Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.
|
2 / 5 |
JBS sells beef, poultry, pork, and prepared foods at global scale, making industrial animal-protein production its core product category. Linked evidence
|
Scale Integrity
?
Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.
|
2 / 5 |
JBS is a large meatpacking group with public-market and controlling-family features rather than stakeholder-democratic food governance. Linked evidence
|
Penalties
| Penalty | Applied | Why this penalty |
|---|---|---|
Human Harm
?
Severity, scale, culpability, vulnerable targets, willful reoffense,
reputation laundering, pattern escalation, and time decay. Range: -20 to
0.
|
-10 |
AP reported that Brazilian labor prosecutors sued JBS over purchases of cattle from farms where workers were allegedly held in slavery-like conditions. Linked evidence
|
Ecological Harm
?
Footprint, trajectory, irreversibility, culpability, and scale,
including whether ecological harm is central to the model and continued
after credible notice. Range: -30 to 0.
|
-14 |
JBS moves into the severe Ecological Harm range because cattle supply-chain deforestation risk and meat-system emissions make ecological damage central rather than incidental. Linked evidence
|
High-Carbon Products
?
Core products, services, financing, or supply chains that materially
depend on fossil-fuel combustion, high-emissions transport, industrial
animal agriculture, meat, dairy, or other unusually carbon-intensive
activity. This is scored separately from general ecological harm so
ordinary consumers can see carbon-intensive product exposure directly.
Range: -10 to 0.
|
-7 |
Meat, dairy, and industrial animal-protein products have unusually high climate burden relative to plant-based alternatives; when they are central to the model, the penalty belongs in the core tier. Linked evidence
|
Toxic Products
?
Current sale of products whose ordinary use, exposure, ingredients,
residues, packaging, or formulation creates toxic, addictive, or
consumer-safety risk. Food products receive at least light scrutiny for
artificial colors, artificial flavors, petro-derived additives,
pesticide residues, contaminants, endocrine-disrupting packaging, and
ultra-processed formulation. Ordinary adult nightlife or alcohol service
is not penalized by itself without evidence of predatory marketing,
youth targeting, addiction-extractive design, or unusual product-safety
misconduct. Range: -5 to 0.
|
-4 |
JBS’s ordinary products are industrial meat and processed meat products, carrying animal-product, food-safety, zoonotic, and factory-farming exposure risks at very large scale. Linked evidence
|
Accountability Opacity
?
Material opacity, reputation laundering, or hidden accountability
structures that prevent public accountability. Range: -2 to 0.
|
-2 |
JBS’s supply-chain complexity makes it difficult for ordinary consumers to know whether meat is tied to deforestation, labor abuse, or high-risk suppliers. Linked evidence
|
Ideological Disavowal
?
Concealed ideology presented as neutrality, expertise, professional
necessity, public-service administration, market inevitability, or
non-ideological common sense while exercising power. Range: -3 to 0.
|
-1 |
JBS sustainability language sits beside a business model whose core scale depends on industrial animal agriculture and contested supply-chain externalities. Linked evidence
|
Bonus Credits
No bonus credits applied in this version.
Confidence Basis
Confidence Basis
Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.
Medium 71/100
8 verified linked claims 8 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 8/15 components covered
This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.
Claim confidence 16/20
8 verified linked claims
Source quality 11/18
Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability
Direct axis-specific claims 9/18
8 direct claims across 15 active components
Dispute load 12/12
0 disputed claims on this entity
Recency 10/10
Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026
Reviewer status 7/12
Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding
Component coverage 5/10
8/15 evidence-bearing components have direct support
Evidence State
Evidence State
Claims and Sources
Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.
* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.1JBS is a large meatpacking group with public-market and controlling-family features rather than stakeholder-democratic food governance.
- JBS investor relationsOfficial self-description · 68%
2AP reported that Brazilian labor prosecutors sued JBS over purchases of cattle from farms where workers were allegedly held in slavery-like conditions.
- AP: Brazil prosecutors sue JBS over beef tied to slavery-like laborIndependent reporting · 82%
3JBS sells beef, poultry, pork, and prepared foods at global scale, making industrial animal-protein production its core product category.
- JBS global brandsGeneral web source · 58%
4JBS’s supply-chain complexity makes it difficult for ordinary consumers to know whether meat is tied to deforestation, labor abuse, or high-risk suppliers.
- CorpWatch: JBS S.A.General web source · 58%
5JBS’s ordinary products are industrial meat and processed meat products, carrying animal-product, food-safety, zoonotic, and factory-farming exposure risks at very large scale.
- JBS global brandsGeneral web source · 58%
6JBS has been repeatedly linked by watchdog and NGO reporting to cattle-supply deforestation risk, making ecological harm central rather than incidental.
- CorpWatch: JBS S.A.General web source · 58%
- World Animal Protection: JBS factory farming empireGeneral web source · 58%
7JBS sustainability language sits beside a business model whose core scale depends on industrial animal agriculture and contested supply-chain externalities.
- JBS sustainability reportOfficial self-description · 68%
8JBS has animal-agriculture core high-carbon product exposure based on its listed business model and current profile description: One of the world’s largest meat companies, with beef, poultry, pork, and prepared-food operations across multiple countries. JBS scores low because of documented human harm, ecological harm, and toxic or materially harm…
- JBS public siteGeneral web source · 58%
- Our World in Data: Environmental Impacts of Food ProductionGeneral web source · 58%
Help Improve This Profile
Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.
How This Page Is Maintained
Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.
Civic Note
Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.
Submit evidence for JBS Add one source-backed fact for review.
Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.
Audit Log
Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.
No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.
View Full Audit Log