JBS

global meatpacking company

JBS

Industry Food

One of the world’s largest meat companies, with beef, poultry, pork, and prepared-food operations across multiple countries. JBS scores low because of documented human harm, ecological harm, and toxic or materially harmful products, with centralized governance and weak worker power reinforcing the negative evaluation.

Why this matters: JBS is among the worst food actors because meatpacking scale, Amazon-linked cattle risk, labor-abuse allegations, and animal-agriculture harms are all core to the business model.

Letter grade F Malignant Medium confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1

Final Score -25* F - Malignant

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material13
Bonus+0
Cap35Ownership <= 2 and Governance <= 2
After Cap13
Penalties-38
!Not Verified
Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Evaluation Overview

F - Malignant

The score turns mainly on Extraction, with the largest penalty coming from Ecological Harm.

Strengths

  • Extraction2/10
  • Market Conduct2/5
  • Product Integrity2/5

Penalties

  • Ecological Harm-14
  • Human Harm-10
  • High-Carbon Products-7
  • Toxic Products-4

Evidence state

  • ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)
  • ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
  • Linked claims8
  • Direct axis claims8
  • Coverage8/15

Scoring Axes

Axis Score Why this score
Ownership
?
Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.
1 / 10

JBS is a large meatpacking group with public-market and controlling-family features rather than stakeholder-democratic food governance.

Linked evidence
  • JBS is a large meatpacking group with public-market and controlling-family features rather than stakeholder-democratic food governance. [1]
Governance
?
Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.
1 / 10

JBS is a large meatpacking group with public-market and controlling-family features rather than stakeholder-democratic food governance.

Linked evidence
  • context JBS is a large meatpacking group with public-market and controlling-family features rather than stakeholder-democratic food governance. [1]
Extraction
?
Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.
2 / 10

JBS is a large meatpacking group with public-market and controlling-family features rather than stakeholder-democratic food governance.

Linked evidence
  • context JBS is a large meatpacking group with public-market and controlling-family features rather than stakeholder-democratic food governance. [1]
  • context AP reported that Brazilian labor prosecutors sued JBS over purchases of cattle from farms where workers were allegedly held in slavery-like conditions. [2]
  • context JBS sells beef, poultry, pork, and prepared foods at global scale, making industrial animal-protein production its core product category. [3]
Labor Sovereignty
?
Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.
1 / 7

JBS is a large meatpacking group with public-market and controlling-family features rather than stakeholder-democratic food governance.

Linked evidence
  • context JBS is a large meatpacking group with public-market and controlling-family features rather than stakeholder-democratic food governance. [1]
  • context AP reported that Brazilian labor prosecutors sued JBS over purchases of cattle from farms where workers were allegedly held in slavery-like conditions. [2]
  • context JBS sells beef, poultry, pork, and prepared foods at global scale, making industrial animal-protein production its core product category. [3]
Solidarity with the Unemployed
?
Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.
1 / 7

JBS is a large meatpacking group with public-market and controlling-family features rather than stakeholder-democratic food governance.

Linked evidence
  • context JBS is a large meatpacking group with public-market and controlling-family features rather than stakeholder-democratic food governance. [1]
  • context AP reported that Brazilian labor prosecutors sued JBS over purchases of cattle from farms where workers were allegedly held in slavery-like conditions. [2]
  • context JBS sells beef, poultry, pork, and prepared foods at global scale, making industrial animal-protein production its core product category. [3]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity
?
Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.
1 / 7

JBS is a large meatpacking group with public-market and controlling-family features rather than stakeholder-democratic food governance.

Linked evidence
  • context JBS is a large meatpacking group with public-market and controlling-family features rather than stakeholder-democratic food governance. [1]
  • context AP reported that Brazilian labor prosecutors sued JBS over purchases of cattle from farms where workers were allegedly held in slavery-like conditions. [2]
  • context JBS sells beef, poultry, pork, and prepared foods at global scale, making industrial animal-protein production its core product category. [3]
Market Conduct
?
Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.
2 / 5

JBS sells beef, poultry, pork, and prepared foods at global scale, making industrial animal-protein production its core product category.

Linked evidence
  • context JBS sells beef, poultry, pork, and prepared foods at global scale, making industrial animal-protein production its core product category. [3]
  • context JBS is a large meatpacking group with public-market and controlling-family features rather than stakeholder-democratic food governance. [1]
  • context JBS’s supply-chain complexity makes it difficult for ordinary consumers to know whether meat is tied to deforestation, labor abuse, or high-risk suppliers. [4]
Product Integrity
?
Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.
2 / 5

JBS sells beef, poultry, pork, and prepared foods at global scale, making industrial animal-protein production its core product category.

Linked evidence
  • JBS sells beef, poultry, pork, and prepared foods at global scale, making industrial animal-protein production its core product category. [3]
  • context JBS’s ordinary products are industrial meat and processed meat products, carrying animal-product, food-safety, zoonotic, and factory-farming exposure risks at very large scale. [5]
Scale Integrity
?
Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.
2 / 5

JBS is a large meatpacking group with public-market and controlling-family features rather than stakeholder-democratic food governance.

Linked evidence
  • context JBS is a large meatpacking group with public-market and controlling-family features rather than stakeholder-democratic food governance. [1]
  • context JBS sells beef, poultry, pork, and prepared foods at global scale, making industrial animal-protein production its core product category. [3]
  • context JBS has been repeatedly linked by watchdog and NGO reporting to cattle-supply deforestation risk, making ecological harm central rather than incidental. [6]

Penalties

Penalty Applied Why this penalty
Human Harm
?
Severity, scale, culpability, vulnerable targets, willful reoffense, reputation laundering, pattern escalation, and time decay. Range: -20 to 0.
-10

AP reported that Brazilian labor prosecutors sued JBS over purchases of cattle from farms where workers were allegedly held in slavery-like conditions.

Linked evidence
  • AP reported that Brazilian labor prosecutors sued JBS over purchases of cattle from farms where workers were allegedly held in slavery-like conditions. [2]
Ecological Harm
?
Footprint, trajectory, irreversibility, culpability, and scale, including whether ecological harm is central to the model and continued after credible notice. Range: -30 to 0.
-14

JBS moves into the severe Ecological Harm range because cattle supply-chain deforestation risk and meat-system emissions make ecological damage central rather than incidental.

Linked evidence
  • JBS has been repeatedly linked by watchdog and NGO reporting to cattle-supply deforestation risk, making ecological harm central rather than incidental. [6]
High-Carbon Products
?
Core products, services, financing, or supply chains that materially depend on fossil-fuel combustion, high-emissions transport, industrial animal agriculture, meat, dairy, or other unusually carbon-intensive activity. This is scored separately from general ecological harm so ordinary consumers can see carbon-intensive product exposure directly. Range: -10 to 0.
-7

Meat, dairy, and industrial animal-protein products have unusually high climate burden relative to plant-based alternatives; when they are central to the model, the penalty belongs in the core tier.

Linked evidence
  • JBS has animal-agriculture core high-carbon product exposure based on its listed business model and current profile description: One of the world’s largest meat companies, with beef, poultry, pork, and prepared-food operations across multiple countries. JBS scores low because of documented human harm, ecological harm, and toxic or materially harm… [8]
Toxic Products
?
Current sale of products whose ordinary use, exposure, ingredients, residues, packaging, or formulation creates toxic, addictive, or consumer-safety risk. Food products receive at least light scrutiny for artificial colors, artificial flavors, petro-derived additives, pesticide residues, contaminants, endocrine-disrupting packaging, and ultra-processed formulation. Ordinary adult nightlife or alcohol service is not penalized by itself without evidence of predatory marketing, youth targeting, addiction-extractive design, or unusual product-safety misconduct. Range: -5 to 0.
-4

JBS’s ordinary products are industrial meat and processed meat products, carrying animal-product, food-safety, zoonotic, and factory-farming exposure risks at very large scale.

Linked evidence
  • JBS’s ordinary products are industrial meat and processed meat products, carrying animal-product, food-safety, zoonotic, and factory-farming exposure risks at very large scale. [5]
Accountability Opacity
?
Material opacity, reputation laundering, or hidden accountability structures that prevent public accountability. Range: -2 to 0.
-2

JBS’s supply-chain complexity makes it difficult for ordinary consumers to know whether meat is tied to deforestation, labor abuse, or high-risk suppliers.

Linked evidence
  • JBS’s supply-chain complexity makes it difficult for ordinary consumers to know whether meat is tied to deforestation, labor abuse, or high-risk suppliers. [4]
Ideological Disavowal
?
Concealed ideology presented as neutrality, expertise, professional necessity, public-service administration, market inevitability, or non-ideological common sense while exercising power. Range: -3 to 0.
-1

JBS sustainability language sits beside a business model whose core scale depends on industrial animal agriculture and contested supply-chain externalities.

Linked evidence
  • JBS sustainability language sits beside a business model whose core scale depends on industrial animal agriculture and contested supply-chain externalities. [7]

Bonus Credits

No bonus credits applied in this version.

Confidence Basis

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

Medium 71/100

8 verified linked claims 8 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 8/15 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 16/20

8 verified linked claims

Source quality 11/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 9/18

8 direct claims across 15 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 5/10

8/15 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending
VerificationUnverified
ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.
Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.
1JBS is a large meatpacking group with public-market and controlling-family features rather than stakeholder-democratic food governance.

Ownership Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

2AP reported that Brazilian labor prosecutors sued JBS over purchases of cattle from farms where workers were allegedly held in slavery-like conditions.

Human Harm Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

3JBS sells beef, poultry, pork, and prepared foods at global scale, making industrial animal-protein production its core product category.

Product Integrity Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

4JBS’s supply-chain complexity makes it difficult for ordinary consumers to know whether meat is tied to deforestation, labor abuse, or high-risk suppliers.

Accountability Opacity Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

5JBS’s ordinary products are industrial meat and processed meat products, carrying animal-product, food-safety, zoonotic, and factory-farming exposure risks at very large scale.

Toxic Products Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

6JBS has been repeatedly linked by watchdog and NGO reporting to cattle-supply deforestation risk, making ecological harm central rather than incidental.

Ecological Harm Verified High confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

7JBS sustainability language sits beside a business model whose core scale depends on industrial animal agriculture and contested supply-chain externalities.

Ideological Disavowal Verified Medium confidence AI-generated / human-pending

AI scaffold

8JBS has animal-agriculture core high-carbon product exposure based on its listed business model and current profile description: One of the world’s largest meat companies, with beef, poultry, pork, and prepared-food operations across multiple countries. JBS scores low because of documented human harm, ecological harm, and toxic or materially harm…

High Carbon Products Verified High confidence Human-reviewed

Alternatives

Competitors

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for JBS Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.

View Full Audit Log