A Michigan-based creator-led seed shop and gardening education company
selling low-cost vegetable, herb, and flower seeds around a YouTube and
social-media audience. MIgardener now scores above Epic Gardening
because direct affordability, a large seed catalog, free seed-only
shipping thresholds, and practical growing education outweigh ordinary
creator-store concerns, while founder dependence still keeps it below
cooperative seed institutions.
Why this matters: Low-cost seeds matter, but a creator
storefront still needs to be calibrated against true ownership
alternatives.
Letter grade BQualifiedHigh
confidence (AI)Rubric gcd-rubric-v1
* Tentative scaffolding score. Not
human-checked or final.
Base Material44Bonus+3Cap49Small-business calibration
cap: medium formal ownership/governance can reach B when person-scale
evidence supports the ordinary axes
After Cap47Penalties-5b
Small business context
This entry is classified as a small business using observable scale
signals: independent control, local or limited operations, and no
evidence of public-company or national-chain scale. The small-business
calibration keeps the ordinary rubric but reads evidence at person
scale: living-wage pricing is not extraction by itself, while worker and
contractor treatment, owner surplus, transparency, advertising pressure,
dissent tolerance, and recourse matter more. Harm, toxicity,
surveillance, labor, coercion, opacity, and hidden-parent penalties are
not relaxed.
Applied cap: Small-business calibration cap: medium formal
ownership/governance can reach B when person-scale evidence supports the
ordinary axes
!Not Verified
Represent this organization?
Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary
materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy
a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors,
omissions, or miscalibration.
The score turns mainly on Extraction, with the largest penalty coming
from Reversibility.
Strengths
Extraction6/10
Solidarity with the
Unemployed6/7
Loss-Bearing
Fidelity5/7
Penalties
Reversibility-5
Evidence state
ConfidenceHigh
confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped
(AI)
Linked claims11
Direct axis claims11
Coverage11/11
Scoring Axes
Axis
Score
Why this score
Ownership
?
Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control
at 10.
4 / 10
MIgardener's public record identifies its ownership form or parent
relationship in the online gardening, seed, nursery, or greenhouse
market.
MIgardener's public record identifies its ownership form or parent
relationship in the online gardening, seed, nursery, or greenhouse
market. On Ownership, MIgardener sits in the positive middle: the
products or services are materially useful for growing food or plants,
and the institution shows some stewardship, durability, affordability,
or mission discipline. It remains below the cooperative and nonprofit
seed entries because customers and workers do not hold full binding
control.
Calibration notes
Comparative anchor: Online gardening pass calibrated
across cooperative seed companies, nonprofit seed preservation, old
catalog retailers, creator-commerce gardening stores, nurseries, and
greenhouse suppliers.
Linked evidence
MIgardener's public record identifies its ownership form or parent
relationship in the online gardening, seed, nursery, or greenhouse
market.[1]
contextMIgardener's public
materials indicate whether control sits with workers, consumers, a
nonprofit board, a family owner, a founder, a private acquirer, or a
parent company.[2]
contextMIgardener's model
determines whether gardening value is routed through cooperative,
nonprofit, employee-owned, small-farm, creator-commerce, catalog-rollup,
or private supplier structures.[3]
contextMIgardener's reviewed
public record shows the degree to which workers have binding ownership
or governance power rather than ordinary employment status.[4]
contextMIgardener's products
or services can support home food growing, seed saving, small farms,
school gardens, community gardens, or lower-cost
self-provisioning.[5]
contextMIgardener's public
model and product promises affect whether customers carry the risk of
crop failure, poor germination, weak plants, shipping damage, bad
advice, or expensive equipment mistakes.[6]
contextMIgardener operates in
a market where gardeners often rely on trust, variety descriptions, seed
counts, guarantees, regional adaptation claims, and replacement policies
before they can verify quality.[7]
contextMIgardener's core
product integrity depends on seed viability, plant health, accurate
variety representation, durable supplies, transparent sourcing, and
useful growing information.[8]
contextMIgardener's scale,
distribution, catalog reach, content audience, or installation capacity
affects whether its gardening work remains educative and accountable or
becomes extractive retail infrastructure.[9]
Governance
?
Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic
stakeholder control at 10.
4 / 10
MIgardener's public materials indicate whether control sits with
workers, consumers, a nonprofit board, a family owner, a founder, a
private acquirer, or a parent company.
MIgardener's public materials indicate whether control sits with
workers, consumers, a nonprofit board, a family owner, a founder, a
private acquirer, or a parent company. On Governance, MIgardener sits in
the positive middle: the products or services are materially useful for
growing food or plants, and the institution shows some stewardship,
durability, affordability, or mission discipline. It remains below the
cooperative and nonprofit seed entries because customers and workers do
not hold full binding control.
Calibration notes
Comparative anchor: Online gardening pass calibrated
across cooperative seed companies, nonprofit seed preservation, old
catalog retailers, creator-commerce gardening stores, nurseries, and
greenhouse suppliers.
Linked evidence
contextMIgardener's public
record identifies its ownership form or parent relationship in the
online gardening, seed, nursery, or greenhouse market.[1]
MIgardener's public materials indicate whether control sits with
workers, consumers, a nonprofit board, a family owner, a founder, a
private acquirer, or a parent company.[2]
contextMIgardener's model
determines whether gardening value is routed through cooperative,
nonprofit, employee-owned, small-farm, creator-commerce, catalog-rollup,
or private supplier structures.[3]
contextMIgardener's reviewed
public record shows the degree to which workers have binding ownership
or governance power rather than ordinary employment status.[4]
contextMIgardener's products
or services can support home food growing, seed saving, small farms,
school gardens, community gardens, or lower-cost
self-provisioning.[5]
contextMIgardener's public
model and product promises affect whether customers carry the risk of
crop failure, poor germination, weak plants, shipping damage, bad
advice, or expensive equipment mistakes.[6]
contextMIgardener operates in
a market where gardeners often rely on trust, variety descriptions, seed
counts, guarantees, regional adaptation claims, and replacement policies
before they can verify quality.[7]
contextMIgardener's core
product integrity depends on seed viability, plant health, accurate
variety representation, durable supplies, transparent sourcing, and
useful growing information.[8]
contextMIgardener's scale,
distribution, catalog reach, content audience, or installation capacity
affects whether its gardening work remains educative and accountable or
becomes extractive retail infrastructure.[9]
Extraction
?
Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured
extraction judgment.
6 / 10
MIgardener remains privately founder-led rather than cooperative, but
direct low-cost seed access and a savings-oriented catalog model route
more value to home growers than ordinary creator commerce.
MIgardener remains privately founder-led rather than cooperative, but
direct low-cost seed access and a savings-oriented catalog model route
more value to home growers than ordinary creator commerce. It belongs
below worker/member seed institutions such as Fedco and Southern
Exposure, but above Epic Gardening because Epic is venture-backed and
acquisition-oriented while MIgardener is still a smaller direct seed
seller.
Calibration notes
Comparative anchor: Small-business gardening
recalibration against Epic Gardening, Botanical Interests, cooperative
seed companies, nonprofit seed preservation, and small independent seed
sellers.
Linked evidence
contextMIgardener's public
record identifies its ownership form or parent relationship in the
online gardening, seed, nursery, or greenhouse market.[1]
contextMIgardener's public
materials indicate whether control sits with workers, consumers, a
nonprofit board, a family owner, a founder, a private acquirer, or a
parent company.[2]
MIgardener's model determines whether gardening value is routed
through cooperative, nonprofit, employee-owned, small-farm,
creator-commerce, catalog-rollup, or private supplier structures.[3]
contextMIgardener's reviewed
public record shows the degree to which workers have binding ownership
or governance power rather than ordinary employment status.[4]
contextMIgardener's products
or services can support home food growing, seed saving, small farms,
school gardens, community gardens, or lower-cost
self-provisioning.[5]
contextMIgardener's public
model and product promises affect whether customers carry the risk of
crop failure, poor germination, weak plants, shipping damage, bad
advice, or expensive equipment mistakes.[6]
contextMIgardener operates in
a market where gardeners often rely on trust, variety descriptions, seed
counts, guarantees, regional adaptation claims, and replacement policies
before they can verify quality.[7]
contextMIgardener's core
product integrity depends on seed viability, plant health, accurate
variety representation, durable supplies, transparent sourcing, and
useful growing information.[8]
contextMIgardener's scale,
distribution, catalog reach, content audience, or installation capacity
affects whether its gardening work remains educative and accountable or
becomes extractive retail infrastructure.[9]
Labor Sovereignty
?
Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at
7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence
shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling,
retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of
worker voice, or extreme turnover.
4 / 7
MIgardener does not show worker ownership or binding employee
governance, so it stays well below cooperative seed companies.
MIgardener does not show worker ownership or binding employee
governance, so it stays well below cooperative seed companies. The
small-business prototype avoids treating that absence as equivalent to a
scaled public company or private-equity platform, so the score rises
modestly while remaining limited.
Calibration notes
Comparative anchor: Small-business gardening
recalibration against Epic Gardening, Botanical Interests, cooperative
seed companies, nonprofit seed preservation, and small independent seed
sellers.
Linked evidence
contextMIgardener's public
record identifies its ownership form or parent relationship in the
online gardening, seed, nursery, or greenhouse market.[1]
contextMIgardener's public
materials indicate whether control sits with workers, consumers, a
nonprofit board, a family owner, a founder, a private acquirer, or a
parent company.[2]
contextMIgardener's model
determines whether gardening value is routed through cooperative,
nonprofit, employee-owned, small-farm, creator-commerce, catalog-rollup,
or private supplier structures.[3]
MIgardener's reviewed public record shows the degree to which
workers have binding ownership or governance power rather than ordinary
employment status.[4]
contextMIgardener's products
or services can support home food growing, seed saving, small farms,
school gardens, community gardens, or lower-cost
self-provisioning.[5]
contextMIgardener's public
model and product promises affect whether customers carry the risk of
crop failure, poor germination, weak plants, shipping damage, bad
advice, or expensive equipment mistakes.[6]
contextMIgardener operates in
a market where gardeners often rely on trust, variety descriptions, seed
counts, guarantees, regional adaptation claims, and replacement policies
before they can verify quality.[7]
contextMIgardener's core
product integrity depends on seed viability, plant health, accurate
variety representation, durable supplies, transparent sourcing, and
useful growing information.[8]
contextMIgardener's scale,
distribution, catalog reach, content audience, or installation capacity
affects whether its gardening work remains educative and accountable or
becomes extractive retail infrastructure.[9]
Solidarity with the
Unemployed
?
Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment,
and non-competes.
6 / 7
Low-cost seeds, a broad public catalog, free seed-only shipping
thresholds, and practical education make MIgardener unusually useful for
home food growing and low-cost self-provisioning.
Low-cost seeds, a broad public catalog, free seed-only shipping
thresholds, and practical education make MIgardener unusually useful for
home food growing and low-cost self-provisioning. It still ranks below
cooperative and nonprofit seed institutions because access depends on a
private storefront and current leadership.
Calibration notes
Comparative anchor: Small-business gardening
recalibration against Epic Gardening, Botanical Interests, cooperative
seed companies, nonprofit seed preservation, and small independent seed
sellers.
Linked evidence
contextMIgardener's public
record identifies its ownership form or parent relationship in the
online gardening, seed, nursery, or greenhouse market.[1]
contextMIgardener's public
materials indicate whether control sits with workers, consumers, a
nonprofit board, a family owner, a founder, a private acquirer, or a
parent company.[2]
contextMIgardener's model
determines whether gardening value is routed through cooperative,
nonprofit, employee-owned, small-farm, creator-commerce, catalog-rollup,
or private supplier structures.[3]
contextMIgardener's reviewed
public record shows the degree to which workers have binding ownership
or governance power rather than ordinary employment status.[4]
MIgardener's products or services can support home food growing,
seed saving, small farms, school gardens, community gardens, or
lower-cost self-provisioning.[5]
contextMIgardener's public
model and product promises affect whether customers carry the risk of
crop failure, poor germination, weak plants, shipping damage, bad
advice, or expensive equipment mistakes.[6]
contextMIgardener operates in
a market where gardeners often rely on trust, variety descriptions, seed
counts, guarantees, regional adaptation claims, and replacement policies
before they can verify quality.[7]
contextMIgardener's core
product integrity depends on seed viability, plant health, accurate
variety representation, durable supplies, transparent sourcing, and
useful growing information.[8]
contextMIgardener's scale,
distribution, catalog reach, content audience, or installation capacity
affects whether its gardening work remains educative and accountable or
becomes extractive retail infrastructure.[9]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity
?
Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and
public obligations.
5 / 7
The downloadable-catalog savings rationale and seed-only free-shipping
threshold show some willingness to lower customer costs rather than
maximize catalog and shipping extraction.
The downloadable-catalog savings rationale and seed-only free-shipping
threshold show some willingness to lower customer costs rather than
maximize catalog and shipping extraction. The credit remains below
cooperative seed institutions because the record does not show binding
customer or worker control over those choices.
Calibration notes
Comparative anchor: Small-business gardening
recalibration against Epic Gardening, Botanical Interests, cooperative
seed companies, nonprofit seed preservation, and small independent seed
sellers.
Linked evidence
contextMIgardener's public
record identifies its ownership form or parent relationship in the
online gardening, seed, nursery, or greenhouse market.[1]
contextMIgardener's public
materials indicate whether control sits with workers, consumers, a
nonprofit board, a family owner, a founder, a private acquirer, or a
parent company.[2]
contextMIgardener's model
determines whether gardening value is routed through cooperative,
nonprofit, employee-owned, small-farm, creator-commerce, catalog-rollup,
or private supplier structures.[3]
contextMIgardener's reviewed
public record shows the degree to which workers have binding ownership
or governance power rather than ordinary employment status.[4]
contextMIgardener's products
or services can support home food growing, seed saving, small farms,
school gardens, community gardens, or lower-cost
self-provisioning.[5]
MIgardener's public model and product promises affect whether
customers carry the risk of crop failure, poor germination, weak plants,
shipping damage, bad advice, or expensive equipment mistakes.[6]
contextMIgardener operates in
a market where gardeners often rely on trust, variety descriptions, seed
counts, guarantees, regional adaptation claims, and replacement policies
before they can verify quality.[7]
contextMIgardener's core
product integrity depends on seed viability, plant health, accurate
variety representation, durable supplies, transparent sourcing, and
useful growing information.[8]
contextMIgardener's scale,
distribution, catalog reach, content audience, or installation capacity
affects whether its gardening work remains educative and accountable or
becomes extractive retail infrastructure.[9]
Market Conduct
?
Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.
5 / 5
MIgardener deserves stronger market-conduct credit because its public
seed catalog, broad seed assortment, free seed-only shipping threshold,
and savings-oriented catalog choice make gardening inputs unusually
accessible.
MIgardener deserves stronger market-conduct credit because its public
seed catalog, broad seed assortment, free seed-only shipping threshold,
and savings-oriented catalog choice make gardening inputs unusually
accessible. It belongs above Epic Gardening on this axis because Epic
combines education with venture-backed content-to-commerce growth and
acquisition scale.
Calibration notes
Comparative anchor: Small-business gardening
recalibration against Epic Gardening, Botanical Interests, cooperative
seed companies, nonprofit seed preservation, and small independent seed
sellers.
Linked evidence
contextMIgardener's public
record identifies its ownership form or parent relationship in the
online gardening, seed, nursery, or greenhouse market.[1]
contextMIgardener's public
materials indicate whether control sits with workers, consumers, a
nonprofit board, a family owner, a founder, a private acquirer, or a
parent company.[2]
contextMIgardener's model
determines whether gardening value is routed through cooperative,
nonprofit, employee-owned, small-farm, creator-commerce, catalog-rollup,
or private supplier structures.[3]
contextMIgardener's reviewed
public record shows the degree to which workers have binding ownership
or governance power rather than ordinary employment status.[4]
contextMIgardener's products
or services can support home food growing, seed saving, small farms,
school gardens, community gardens, or lower-cost
self-provisioning.[5]
contextMIgardener's public
model and product promises affect whether customers carry the risk of
crop failure, poor germination, weak plants, shipping damage, bad
advice, or expensive equipment mistakes.[6]
MIgardener operates in a market where gardeners often rely on
trust, variety descriptions, seed counts, guarantees, regional
adaptation claims, and replacement policies before they can verify
quality.[7]
contextMIgardener's core
product integrity depends on seed viability, plant health, accurate
variety representation, durable supplies, transparent sourcing, and
useful growing information.[8]
contextMIgardener's scale,
distribution, catalog reach, content audience, or installation capacity
affects whether its gardening work remains educative and accountable or
becomes extractive retail infrastructure.[9]
Product Integrity
?
Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.
5 / 5
MIgardener sells a broad seed catalog and practical growing education
that directly support home gardening.
MIgardener sells a broad seed catalog and practical growing education
that directly support home gardening. The profile stays below
cooperative seed institutions because sourcing and governance
transparency are thinner, but it no longer belongs at the same level as
venture-backed creator-commerce gardening stores.
Calibration notes
Comparative anchor: Small-business gardening
recalibration against Epic Gardening, Botanical Interests, cooperative
seed companies, nonprofit seed preservation, and small independent seed
sellers.
Linked evidence
contextMIgardener's public
record identifies its ownership form or parent relationship in the
online gardening, seed, nursery, or greenhouse market.[1]
contextMIgardener's public
materials indicate whether control sits with workers, consumers, a
nonprofit board, a family owner, a founder, a private acquirer, or a
parent company.[2]
contextMIgardener's model
determines whether gardening value is routed through cooperative,
nonprofit, employee-owned, small-farm, creator-commerce, catalog-rollup,
or private supplier structures.[3]
contextMIgardener's reviewed
public record shows the degree to which workers have binding ownership
or governance power rather than ordinary employment status.[4]
contextMIgardener's products
or services can support home food growing, seed saving, small farms,
school gardens, community gardens, or lower-cost
self-provisioning.[5]
contextMIgardener's public
model and product promises affect whether customers carry the risk of
crop failure, poor germination, weak plants, shipping damage, bad
advice, or expensive equipment mistakes.[6]
contextMIgardener operates in
a market where gardeners often rely on trust, variety descriptions, seed
counts, guarantees, regional adaptation claims, and replacement policies
before they can verify quality.[7]
MIgardener's core product integrity depends on seed viability,
plant health, accurate variety representation, durable supplies,
transparent sourcing, and useful growing information.[8]
contextMIgardener's scale,
distribution, catalog reach, content audience, or installation capacity
affects whether its gardening work remains educative and accountable or
becomes extractive retail infrastructure.[9]
Scale Integrity
?
Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.
5 / 5
MIgardener's scale, distribution, catalog reach, content audience, or
installation capacity affects whether its gardening work remains
educative and accountable or becomes extractive retail infrastructure.
MIgardener's scale, distribution, catalog reach, content audience, or
installation capacity affects whether its gardening work remains
educative and accountable or becomes extractive retail infrastructure.
On Scale Integrity, MIgardener sits in the positive middle: the products
or services are materially useful for growing food or plants, and the
institution shows some stewardship, durability, affordability, or
mission discipline. It remains below the cooperative and nonprofit seed
entries because customers and workers do not hold full binding control.
Calibration notes
Comparative anchor: Online gardening pass calibrated
across cooperative seed companies, nonprofit seed preservation, old
catalog retailers, creator-commerce gardening stores, nurseries, and
greenhouse suppliers.
Linked evidence
contextMIgardener's public
record identifies its ownership form or parent relationship in the
online gardening, seed, nursery, or greenhouse market.[1]
contextMIgardener's public
materials indicate whether control sits with workers, consumers, a
nonprofit board, a family owner, a founder, a private acquirer, or a
parent company.[2]
contextMIgardener's model
determines whether gardening value is routed through cooperative,
nonprofit, employee-owned, small-farm, creator-commerce, catalog-rollup,
or private supplier structures.[3]
contextMIgardener's reviewed
public record shows the degree to which workers have binding ownership
or governance power rather than ordinary employment status.[4]
contextMIgardener's products
or services can support home food growing, seed saving, small farms,
school gardens, community gardens, or lower-cost
self-provisioning.[5]
contextMIgardener's public
model and product promises affect whether customers carry the risk of
crop failure, poor germination, weak plants, shipping damage, bad
advice, or expensive equipment mistakes.[6]
contextMIgardener operates in
a market where gardeners often rely on trust, variety descriptions, seed
counts, guarantees, regional adaptation claims, and replacement policies
before they can verify quality.[7]
contextMIgardener's core
product integrity depends on seed viability, plant health, accurate
variety representation, durable supplies, transparent sourcing, and
useful growing information.[8]
MIgardener's scale, distribution, catalog reach, content audience,
or installation capacity affects whether its gardening work remains
educative and accountable or becomes extractive retail
infrastructure.[9]
Penalties
Penalty
Applied
Why this penalty
Reversibility
?
Applied when positive conduct depends on current living leaders,
founders, family owners, or other person-contingent governance rather
than durable structure. Range: -5 to 0.
-5
MIgardener still carries the standard Reversibility penalty because its
affordability, education, and catalog posture depend on current
founder-led private control rather than cooperative, nonprofit, or
otherwise durable governance.
MIgardener still carries the standard Reversibility penalty because its
affordability, education, and catalog posture depend on current
founder-led private control rather than cooperative, nonprofit, or
otherwise durable governance. The improved score comes from direct
small-business value and deal quality, not from treating founder
dependence as solved.
Calibration notes
Comparative anchor: Small-business gardening
recalibration against Epic Gardening, Botanical Interests, cooperative
seed companies, nonprofit seed preservation, and small independent seed
sellers.
Linked evidence
MIgardener's public record makes Reversibility relevant through
its ownership structure, pricing, sourcing, subscriptions,
content-to-commerce design, product-risk profile, pesticide/plastic
exposure, or public controversy.[11]
Bonus Credits
Bonus
Credit
Why this credit
Good Deal
?
Credit for unusually fair value: durable quality, fair pricing, low
lock-in, and clear customer surplus.
3 / 3
Current public evidence shows a broad seed catalog, a seed-only
free-shipping threshold for U.S. and Canadian orders, and an explicit
downloadable-catalog savings rationale.
Current public evidence shows a broad seed catalog, a seed-only
free-shipping threshold for U.S. and Canadian orders, and an explicit
downloadable-catalog savings rationale. It belongs above Epic Gardening
and Botanical Interests on affordability even though cooperative
ownership alternatives still score higher structurally.
Calibration notes
Comparative anchor: Small-business gardening
recalibration against Epic Gardening, Botanical Interests, cooperative
seed companies, nonprofit seed preservation, and small independent seed
sellers.
Linked evidence
MIgardener lists a seed-only free-shipping threshold for U.S. and
Canadian orders, publishes hundreds of seed varieties, and says it uses
a downloadable catalog rather than a printed catalog to pass savings to
customers.[10]
Confidence Basis
Confidence Basis
Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not
typed into the profile by hand.
2MIgardener's public materials
indicate whether control sits with workers, consumers, a nonprofit
board, a family owner, a founder, a private acquirer, or a parent
company.
3MIgardener's model determines whether
gardening value is routed through cooperative, nonprofit,
employee-owned, small-farm, creator-commerce, catalog-rollup, or private
supplier structures.
4MIgardener's reviewed public record
shows the degree to which workers have binding ownership or governance
power rather than ordinary employment status.
5MIgardener's products or services can
support home food growing, seed saving, small farms, school gardens,
community gardens, or lower-cost self-provisioning.
6MIgardener's public model and product
promises affect whether customers carry the risk of crop failure, poor
germination, weak plants, shipping damage, bad advice, or expensive
equipment mistakes.
Loss Bearing FidelityVerifiedHigh
confidenceHuman-reviewed
7MIgardener operates in a market where
gardeners often rely on trust, variety descriptions, seed counts,
guarantees, regional adaptation claims, and replacement policies before
they can verify quality.
9MIgardener's scale, distribution,
catalog reach, content audience, or installation capacity affects
whether its gardening work remains educative and accountable or becomes
extractive retail infrastructure.
10MIgardener lists a seed-only
free-shipping threshold for U.S. and Canadian orders, publishes hundreds
of seed varieties, and says it uses a downloadable catalog rather than a
printed catalog to pass savings to customers.
11MIgardener's public record makes
Reversibility relevant through its ownership structure, pricing,
sourcing, subscriptions, content-to-commerce design, product-risk
profile, pesticide/plastic exposure, or public controversy.
Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source,
axis value, or calculation below.
How This Page Is Maintained
Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is
synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible;
scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.
Civic Note
Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional
privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those
privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users,
communities, and the public.
Submit evidence for MIgardener Add one source-backed
fact for review.
Challenge this rating Point to a specific score,
claim, source, or calculation problem.
Audit Log
Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is
part of the Transparency record.
No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.