The Ohio State University

public land-grant research university

The Ohio State University

Industry Universities

A large public land-grant research university with statewide teaching, research, medical, athletic, and extension roles. Ohio State scores in the public-university middle: broader public mission and governor-appointed trustees beat private elite control, while animal research, tuition exposure, athletics scale, and political governance limit it.

Why this matters: Ohio State is a major state-university competitor and a strong calibration point for land-grant public institutions.

Letter grade C Performative High confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1

Final Score 35* C - Performative
CPERFORMATIVE35 tentative score pts

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material47
Bonus+0
Cap66No structure cap
After Cap47
Penalties-12
!Not Verified
Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Evaluation Overview

C - Performative

The score turns mainly on Ownership, with the largest penalty coming from Animal Testing.

Strengths

  • Ownership6/10
  • Extraction6/10
  • Solidarity with the Unemployed6/7

Penalties

  • Animal Testing-5
  • Ecological Harm-2
  • Accountability Opacity-2
  • Ideological Disavowal-2

Evidence state

  • ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)
  • ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
  • Linked claims14
  • Direct axis claims14
  • Coverage14/14

Scoring Axes
Axis Score Why this score
Ownership
?
Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.
6 / 10

The Ohio State University's public record identifies it as a public, private nonprofit, for-profit, community-college, land-grant, or online higher-education institution.

Calibration notes

Comparative anchor: Higher-education expansion batch calibrated across public research universities, private elite universities, online universities, community colleges, work colleges, and for-profit colleges.

Linked evidence
  • The Ohio State University's public record identifies it as a public, private nonprofit, for-profit, community-college, land-grant, or online higher-education institution. [1]
  • context The Ohio State University's public record shows whether binding authority sits with regents, trustees, elected/public bodies, governors, executives, or private owners rather than with students and ordinary workers. [2]
  • context The Ohio State University's tuition, fee, aid, no-tuition, or online-pricing model determines how much education cost is shifted to students and families versus absorbed by public subsidy, endowment, donors, or the institution. [3]
  • context The Ohio State University's public governance materials do not show ordinary faculty, staff, or student workers holding full binding democratic control over the institution. [4]
  • context The Ohio State University's access model affects people seeking credentials, retraining, transfer pathways, career mobility, or adult education during economically vulnerable periods. [5]
  • context The Ohio State University's public model shows whether the institution absorbs education cost through public subsidy, endowment, philanthropy, or low tuition, or instead passes risk to students through tuition bills and debt exposure. [6]
  • context The Ohio State University operates in credential markets where students face asymmetric information, switching costs, sunk credits, admissions pressure, and debt-financed purchasing decisions. [7]
  • context The Ohio State University's core service has real education, research, transfer, workforce, medical, or public-service value, but integrity depends on access, quality, cost, academic freedom, and student outcomes. [8]
  • context The Ohio State University's scale makes its decisions consequential for students, workers, public budgets, local communities, patients, research subjects, or credential markets. [9]
Governance
?
Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.
5 / 10

The Ohio State University's public record gives limited direct evidence about whether binding authority sits with regents, trustees, elected/public bodies, governors, executives, or private owners rather than with students and ordinary workers.

Calibration notes

Comparative anchor: Higher-education expansion batch calibrated across public research universities, private elite universities, online universities, community colleges, work colleges, and for-profit colleges.

Linked evidence
  • context The Ohio State University's public record identifies it as a public, private nonprofit, for-profit, community-college, land-grant, or online higher-education institution. [1]
  • The Ohio State University's public record shows whether binding authority sits with regents, trustees, elected/public bodies, governors, executives, or private owners rather than with students and ordinary workers. [2]
  • context The Ohio State University's tuition, fee, aid, no-tuition, or online-pricing model determines how much education cost is shifted to students and families versus absorbed by public subsidy, endowment, donors, or the institution. [3]
  • context The Ohio State University's public governance materials do not show ordinary faculty, staff, or student workers holding full binding democratic control over the institution. [4]
  • context The Ohio State University's access model affects people seeking credentials, retraining, transfer pathways, career mobility, or adult education during economically vulnerable periods. [5]
  • context The Ohio State University's public model shows whether the institution absorbs education cost through public subsidy, endowment, philanthropy, or low tuition, or instead passes risk to students through tuition bills and debt exposure. [6]
  • context The Ohio State University operates in credential markets where students face asymmetric information, switching costs, sunk credits, admissions pressure, and debt-financed purchasing decisions. [7]
  • context The Ohio State University's core service has real education, research, transfer, workforce, medical, or public-service value, but integrity depends on access, quality, cost, academic freedom, and student outcomes. [8]
  • context The Ohio State University's scale makes its decisions consequential for students, workers, public budgets, local communities, patients, research subjects, or credential markets. [9]
Extraction
?
Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.
6 / 10

The Ohio State University's tuition, fee, aid, no-tuition, or online-pricing model determines how much education cost is shifted to students and families versus absorbed by public subsidy, endowment, donors, or the institution.

Calibration notes

Comparative anchor: Higher-education expansion batch calibrated across public research universities, private elite universities, online universities, community colleges, work colleges, and for-profit colleges.

Linked evidence
  • context The Ohio State University's public record identifies it as a public, private nonprofit, for-profit, community-college, land-grant, or online higher-education institution. [1]
  • context The Ohio State University's public record shows whether binding authority sits with regents, trustees, elected/public bodies, governors, executives, or private owners rather than with students and ordinary workers. [2]
  • The Ohio State University's tuition, fee, aid, no-tuition, or online-pricing model determines how much education cost is shifted to students and families versus absorbed by public subsidy, endowment, donors, or the institution. [3]
  • context The Ohio State University's public governance materials do not show ordinary faculty, staff, or student workers holding full binding democratic control over the institution. [4]
  • context The Ohio State University's access model affects people seeking credentials, retraining, transfer pathways, career mobility, or adult education during economically vulnerable periods. [5]
  • context The Ohio State University's public model shows whether the institution absorbs education cost through public subsidy, endowment, philanthropy, or low tuition, or instead passes risk to students through tuition bills and debt exposure. [6]
  • context The Ohio State University operates in credential markets where students face asymmetric information, switching costs, sunk credits, admissions pressure, and debt-financed purchasing decisions. [7]
  • context The Ohio State University's core service has real education, research, transfer, workforce, medical, or public-service value, but integrity depends on access, quality, cost, academic freedom, and student outcomes. [8]
  • context The Ohio State University's scale makes its decisions consequential for students, workers, public budgets, local communities, patients, research subjects, or credential markets. [9]
Labor Sovereignty
?
Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.
5 / 7

The Ohio State University's public governance materials do not show ordinary faculty, staff, or student workers holding full binding democratic control over the institution.

Calibration notes

Comparative anchor: Higher-education expansion batch calibrated across public research universities, private elite universities, online universities, community colleges, work colleges, and for-profit colleges.

Linked evidence
  • context The Ohio State University's public record identifies it as a public, private nonprofit, for-profit, community-college, land-grant, or online higher-education institution. [1]
  • context The Ohio State University's public record shows whether binding authority sits with regents, trustees, elected/public bodies, governors, executives, or private owners rather than with students and ordinary workers. [2]
  • context The Ohio State University's tuition, fee, aid, no-tuition, or online-pricing model determines how much education cost is shifted to students and families versus absorbed by public subsidy, endowment, donors, or the institution. [3]
  • The Ohio State University's public governance materials do not show ordinary faculty, staff, or student workers holding full binding democratic control over the institution. [4]
  • context The Ohio State University's access model affects people seeking credentials, retraining, transfer pathways, career mobility, or adult education during economically vulnerable periods. [5]
  • context The Ohio State University's public model shows whether the institution absorbs education cost through public subsidy, endowment, philanthropy, or low tuition, or instead passes risk to students through tuition bills and debt exposure. [6]
  • context The Ohio State University operates in credential markets where students face asymmetric information, switching costs, sunk credits, admissions pressure, and debt-financed purchasing decisions. [7]
  • context The Ohio State University's core service has real education, research, transfer, workforce, medical, or public-service value, but integrity depends on access, quality, cost, academic freedom, and student outcomes. [8]
  • context The Ohio State University's scale makes its decisions consequential for students, workers, public budgets, local communities, patients, research subjects, or credential markets. [9]
Solidarity with the Unemployed
?
Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.
6 / 7

The Ohio State University's access model affects people seeking credentials, retraining, transfer pathways, career mobility, or adult education during economically vulnerable periods.

Calibration notes

Comparative anchor: Higher-education expansion batch calibrated across public research universities, private elite universities, online universities, community colleges, work colleges, and for-profit colleges.

Linked evidence
  • context The Ohio State University's public record identifies it as a public, private nonprofit, for-profit, community-college, land-grant, or online higher-education institution. [1]
  • context The Ohio State University's public record shows whether binding authority sits with regents, trustees, elected/public bodies, governors, executives, or private owners rather than with students and ordinary workers. [2]
  • context The Ohio State University's tuition, fee, aid, no-tuition, or online-pricing model determines how much education cost is shifted to students and families versus absorbed by public subsidy, endowment, donors, or the institution. [3]
  • context The Ohio State University's public governance materials do not show ordinary faculty, staff, or student workers holding full binding democratic control over the institution. [4]
  • The Ohio State University's access model affects people seeking credentials, retraining, transfer pathways, career mobility, or adult education during economically vulnerable periods. [5]
  • context The Ohio State University's public model shows whether the institution absorbs education cost through public subsidy, endowment, philanthropy, or low tuition, or instead passes risk to students through tuition bills and debt exposure. [6]
  • context The Ohio State University operates in credential markets where students face asymmetric information, switching costs, sunk credits, admissions pressure, and debt-financed purchasing decisions. [7]
  • context The Ohio State University's core service has real education, research, transfer, workforce, medical, or public-service value, but integrity depends on access, quality, cost, academic freedom, and student outcomes. [8]
  • context The Ohio State University's scale makes its decisions consequential for students, workers, public budgets, local communities, patients, research subjects, or credential markets. [9]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity
?
Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.
5 / 7

The Ohio State University's public model shows whether the institution absorbs education cost through public subsidy, endowment, philanthropy, or low tuition, or instead passes risk to students through tuition bills and debt exposure.

Calibration notes

Comparative anchor: Higher-education expansion batch calibrated across public research universities, private elite universities, online universities, community colleges, work colleges, and for-profit colleges.

Linked evidence
  • context The Ohio State University's public record identifies it as a public, private nonprofit, for-profit, community-college, land-grant, or online higher-education institution. [1]
  • context The Ohio State University's public record shows whether binding authority sits with regents, trustees, elected/public bodies, governors, executives, or private owners rather than with students and ordinary workers. [2]
  • context The Ohio State University's tuition, fee, aid, no-tuition, or online-pricing model determines how much education cost is shifted to students and families versus absorbed by public subsidy, endowment, donors, or the institution. [3]
  • context The Ohio State University's public governance materials do not show ordinary faculty, staff, or student workers holding full binding democratic control over the institution. [4]
  • context The Ohio State University's access model affects people seeking credentials, retraining, transfer pathways, career mobility, or adult education during economically vulnerable periods. [5]
  • The Ohio State University's public model shows whether the institution absorbs education cost through public subsidy, endowment, philanthropy, or low tuition, or instead passes risk to students through tuition bills and debt exposure. [6]
  • context The Ohio State University operates in credential markets where students face asymmetric information, switching costs, sunk credits, admissions pressure, and debt-financed purchasing decisions. [7]
  • context The Ohio State University's core service has real education, research, transfer, workforce, medical, or public-service value, but integrity depends on access, quality, cost, academic freedom, and student outcomes. [8]
  • context The Ohio State University's scale makes its decisions consequential for students, workers, public budgets, local communities, patients, research subjects, or credential markets. [9]
Market Conduct
?
Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.
4 / 5

The Ohio State University operates in credential markets where students face asymmetric information, switching costs, sunk credits, admissions pressure, and debt-financed purchasing decisions.

Calibration notes

Comparative anchor: Higher-education expansion batch calibrated across public research universities, private elite universities, online universities, community colleges, work colleges, and for-profit colleges.

Linked evidence
  • context The Ohio State University's public record identifies it as a public, private nonprofit, for-profit, community-college, land-grant, or online higher-education institution. [1]
  • context The Ohio State University's public record shows whether binding authority sits with regents, trustees, elected/public bodies, governors, executives, or private owners rather than with students and ordinary workers. [2]
  • context The Ohio State University's tuition, fee, aid, no-tuition, or online-pricing model determines how much education cost is shifted to students and families versus absorbed by public subsidy, endowment, donors, or the institution. [3]
  • context The Ohio State University's public governance materials do not show ordinary faculty, staff, or student workers holding full binding democratic control over the institution. [4]
  • context The Ohio State University's access model affects people seeking credentials, retraining, transfer pathways, career mobility, or adult education during economically vulnerable periods. [5]
  • context The Ohio State University's public model shows whether the institution absorbs education cost through public subsidy, endowment, philanthropy, or low tuition, or instead passes risk to students through tuition bills and debt exposure. [6]
  • The Ohio State University operates in credential markets where students face asymmetric information, switching costs, sunk credits, admissions pressure, and debt-financed purchasing decisions. [7]
  • context The Ohio State University's core service has real education, research, transfer, workforce, medical, or public-service value, but integrity depends on access, quality, cost, academic freedom, and student outcomes. [8]
  • context The Ohio State University's scale makes its decisions consequential for students, workers, public budgets, local communities, patients, research subjects, or credential markets. [9]
Product Integrity
?
Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.
5 / 5

The Ohio State University's core service has real education, research, transfer, workforce, medical, or public-service value, but integrity depends on access, quality, cost, academic freedom, and student outcomes.

Calibration notes

Comparative anchor: Higher-education expansion batch calibrated across public research universities, private elite universities, online universities, community colleges, work colleges, and for-profit colleges.

Linked evidence
  • context The Ohio State University's public record identifies it as a public, private nonprofit, for-profit, community-college, land-grant, or online higher-education institution. [1]
  • context The Ohio State University's public record shows whether binding authority sits with regents, trustees, elected/public bodies, governors, executives, or private owners rather than with students and ordinary workers. [2]
  • context The Ohio State University's tuition, fee, aid, no-tuition, or online-pricing model determines how much education cost is shifted to students and families versus absorbed by public subsidy, endowment, donors, or the institution. [3]
  • context The Ohio State University's public governance materials do not show ordinary faculty, staff, or student workers holding full binding democratic control over the institution. [4]
  • context The Ohio State University's access model affects people seeking credentials, retraining, transfer pathways, career mobility, or adult education during economically vulnerable periods. [5]
  • context The Ohio State University's public model shows whether the institution absorbs education cost through public subsidy, endowment, philanthropy, or low tuition, or instead passes risk to students through tuition bills and debt exposure. [6]
  • context The Ohio State University operates in credential markets where students face asymmetric information, switching costs, sunk credits, admissions pressure, and debt-financed purchasing decisions. [7]
  • The Ohio State University's core service has real education, research, transfer, workforce, medical, or public-service value, but integrity depends on access, quality, cost, academic freedom, and student outcomes. [8]
  • context The Ohio State University's scale makes its decisions consequential for students, workers, public budgets, local communities, patients, research subjects, or credential markets. [9]
Scale Integrity
?
Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.
5 / 5

The Ohio State University's scale makes its decisions consequential for students, workers, public budgets, local communities, patients, research subjects, or credential markets.

Calibration notes

Comparative anchor: Higher-education expansion batch calibrated across public research universities, private elite universities, online universities, community colleges, work colleges, and for-profit colleges.

Linked evidence
  • context The Ohio State University's public record identifies it as a public, private nonprofit, for-profit, community-college, land-grant, or online higher-education institution. [1]
  • context The Ohio State University's public record shows whether binding authority sits with regents, trustees, elected/public bodies, governors, executives, or private owners rather than with students and ordinary workers. [2]
  • context The Ohio State University's tuition, fee, aid, no-tuition, or online-pricing model determines how much education cost is shifted to students and families versus absorbed by public subsidy, endowment, donors, or the institution. [3]
  • context The Ohio State University's public governance materials do not show ordinary faculty, staff, or student workers holding full binding democratic control over the institution. [4]
  • context The Ohio State University's access model affects people seeking credentials, retraining, transfer pathways, career mobility, or adult education during economically vulnerable periods. [5]
  • context The Ohio State University's public model shows whether the institution absorbs education cost through public subsidy, endowment, philanthropy, or low tuition, or instead passes risk to students through tuition bills and debt exposure. [6]
  • context The Ohio State University operates in credential markets where students face asymmetric information, switching costs, sunk credits, admissions pressure, and debt-financed purchasing decisions. [7]
  • context The Ohio State University's core service has real education, research, transfer, workforce, medical, or public-service value, but integrity depends on access, quality, cost, academic freedom, and student outcomes. [8]
  • The Ohio State University's scale makes its decisions consequential for students, workers, public budgets, local communities, patients, research subjects, or credential markets. [9]

Penalties
Penalty Applied Why this penalty
Ecological Harm
?
Footprint, trajectory, irreversibility, culpability, and scale, including whether ecological harm is central to the model and continued after credible notice. Range: -30 to 0.
-2

The Ohio State University's public record makes Ecological Harm relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research, campus…

Calibration notes

Comparative anchor: Higher-education expansion batch calibrated across public research universities, private elite universities, online universities, community colleges, work colleges, and for-profit colleges.

Linked evidence
  • The Ohio State University's public record makes Ecological Harm relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research, campus footprint, lobbying, online monitoring, identity formation, or institutional neutrality claims. [10]
Animal Testing
?
Direct animal testing, contract animal testing, animal-testing-dependent product development, or business lines where current safety/regulatory approval normally relies on animal experiments. Stronger penalties apply where animal testing is core, repeated, non-optional, or avoidable; documented cruelty-free or non-animal methods reduce or eliminate the penalty. Range: -8 to 0.
-5

The Ohio State University's public record makes Animal Testing relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research, campus…

Calibration notes

Comparative anchor: Higher-education expansion batch calibrated across public research universities, private elite universities, online universities, community colleges, work colleges, and for-profit colleges.

Linked evidence
  • The Ohio State University's public record makes Animal Testing relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research, campus footprint, lobbying, online monitoring, identity formation, or institutional neutrality claims. [11]
Accountability Opacity
?
Material opacity, reputation laundering, or hidden accountability structures that prevent public accountability. Range: -2 to 0.
-2

The Ohio State University's public record makes Accountability Opacity relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research,…

Calibration notes

Comparative anchor: Higher-education expansion batch calibrated across public research universities, private elite universities, online universities, community colleges, work colleges, and for-profit colleges.

Linked evidence
  • The Ohio State University's public record makes Accountability Opacity relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research, campus footprint, lobbying, online monitoring, identity formation, or institutional neutrality claims. [12]
Surveillance Capture
?
Invasive surveillance, unreasonably non-optional tracking, facial recognition, biometric identification, or AI behavior scanning of customers, workers, bystanders, or the public. Range: -5 to 0.
-1

The Ohio State University's public record makes Surveillance Capture relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research, campus…

Calibration notes

Comparative anchor: Higher-education expansion batch calibrated across public research universities, private elite universities, online universities, community colleges, work colleges, and for-profit colleges.

Linked evidence
  • The Ohio State University's public record makes Surveillance Capture relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research, campus footprint, lobbying, online monitoring, identity formation, or institutional neutrality claims. [13]
Ideological Disavowal
?
Concealed ideology presented as neutrality, expertise, professional necessity, public-service administration, market inevitability, or non-ideological common sense while exercising power. Range: -3 to 0.
-2

The Ohio State University's public record makes Ideological Disavowal relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research, campus…

Calibration notes

Comparative anchor: Higher-education expansion batch calibrated across public research universities, private elite universities, online universities, community colleges, work colleges, and for-profit colleges.

Linked evidence
  • The Ohio State University's public record makes Ideological Disavowal relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research, campus footprint, lobbying, online monitoring, identity formation, or institutional neutrality claims. [14]

Bonus Credits

No bonus credits applied in this version.

Confidence Basis

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

High 85/100

14 verified linked claims 14 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 14/14 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 16/20

14 verified linked claims

Source quality 16/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 14/18

14 direct claims across 14 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 10/10

14/14 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending
VerificationUnverified
ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.
Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.
1The Ohio State University's public record identifies it as a public, private nonprofit, for-profit, community-college, land-grant, or online higher-education institution.

Ownership Verified High confidence Human-reviewed

2The Ohio State University's public record shows whether binding authority sits with regents, trustees, elected/public bodies, governors, executives, or private owners rather than with students and ordinary workers.

Governance Verified High confidence Human-reviewed

3The Ohio State University's tuition, fee, aid, no-tuition, or online-pricing model determines how much education cost is shifted to students and families versus absorbed by public subsidy, endowment, donors, or the institution.

Extraction Verified High confidence Human-reviewed

4The Ohio State University's public governance materials do not show ordinary faculty, staff, or student workers holding full binding democratic control over the institution.

Labor Sovereignty Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed

5The Ohio State University's access model affects people seeking credentials, retraining, transfer pathways, career mobility, or adult education during economically vulnerable periods.

Solidarity Unemployed Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed

6The Ohio State University's public model shows whether the institution absorbs education cost through public subsidy, endowment, philanthropy, or low tuition, or instead passes risk to students through tuition bills and debt exposure.

Loss Bearing Fidelity Verified High confidence Human-reviewed

7The Ohio State University operates in credential markets where students face asymmetric information, switching costs, sunk credits, admissions pressure, and debt-financed purchasing decisions.

Market Conduct Verified High confidence Human-reviewed

8The Ohio State University's core service has real education, research, transfer, workforce, medical, or public-service value, but integrity depends on access, quality, cost, academic freedom, and student outcomes.

Product Integrity Verified High confidence Human-reviewed

9The Ohio State University's scale makes its decisions consequential for students, workers, public budgets, local communities, patients, research subjects, or credential markets.

Scale Integrity Verified High confidence Human-reviewed

10The Ohio State University's public record makes Ecological Harm relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research, campus footprint, lobbying, online monitoring, identity formation, or institutional neutrality claims.

Ecological Harm Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed

11The Ohio State University's public record makes Animal Testing relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research, campus footprint, lobbying, online monitoring, identity formation, or institutional neutrality claims.

Animal Testing Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed

12The Ohio State University's public record makes Accountability Opacity relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research, campus footprint, lobbying, online monitoring, identity formation, or institutional neutrality claims.

Accountability Opacity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed

13The Ohio State University's public record makes Surveillance Capture relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research, campus footprint, lobbying, online monitoring, identity formation, or institutional neutrality claims.

Surveillance Capture Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed

14The Ohio State University's public record makes Ideological Disavowal relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research, campus footprint, lobbying, online monitoring, identity formation, or institutional neutrality claims.

Ideological Disavowal Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed

Alternatives

AGOOD54 tentative score Berea College private nonprofit work college · same market AGOOD52 tentative score Maricopa Community Colleges public community-college system · same market AGOOD51 tentative score Miami Dade College public college · same market AGOOD51 tentative score Seattle Colleges public community-college district · same market AGOOD50 tentative score Bellevue College public college · same market

Competitors

AGOOD54 tentative score Berea College private nonprofit work college · same market AGOOD52 tentative score Maricopa Community Colleges public community-college system · same market AGOOD51 tentative score Miami Dade College public college · same market AGOOD51 tentative score Seattle Colleges public community-college district · same market AGOOD50 tentative score Bellevue College public college · same market BQUALIFIED49 tentative score Dallas College public community-college system · same market BQUALIFIED46 tentative score Western Governors University nonprofit online university · same market CPERFORMATIVE36 tentative score State University of New York public university system · same market

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for The Ohio State University Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.

View Full Audit Log