public university system

State University of New York

A large public university system spanning research universities, comprehensive colleges, technology colleges, and community colleges. SUNY scores above private universities because public governance and broad access are central, but indirect trustee control, tuition and fee authority, animal research at research campuses, and system bureaucracy limit it.

Why this matters: SUNY is a major public-system comparator to UC and CUNY, with both flagship research and community-college functions.

Letter grade C Performative High confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1 Last reviewed May 12, 2026

Final Score 36* C - Performative

CPERFORMATIVE36 pts

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material49

Bonus+0

Cap66No structure cap

After Cap49

Penalties-13

!Not Verified

Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Evaluation Overview

C - Performative

The score turns mainly on Extraction, with the largest penalty coming from Animal Testing.

Strengths

Extraction7/10
Solidarity with the Unemployed7/7
Ownership6/10

Penalties

Animal Testing-5
Ecological Harm-3
Accountability Opacity-2
Ideological Disavowal-2

Evidence state

ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Linked claims14
Direct axis claims14
Coverage14/14

Scoring Axes

Axis	Score	Why this score
Ownership ? Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.	6 / 10	State University of New York's public record identifies it as a public, private nonprofit, for-profit, community-college, land-grant, or online higher-education institution. State University of New York's public record identifies it as a public, private nonprofit, for-profit, community-college, land-grant, or online higher-education institution. On Ownership, State University of New York sits in the middle: the institution has real education or research value and some public or nonprofit constraint, but students and ordinary workers still do not control price, admissions, curriculum, discipline, labor policy, or institutional priorities. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Higher-education expansion batch calibrated across public research universities, private elite universities, online universities, community colleges, work colleges, and for-profit colleges. Linked evidence State University of New York's public record identifies it as a public, private nonprofit, for-profit, community-college, land-grant, or online higher-education institution. [1] context State University of New York's public record shows whether binding authority sits with regents, trustees, elected/public bodies, governors, executives, or private owners rather than with students and ordinary workers. [2] context State University of New York's tuition, fee, aid, no-tuition, or online-pricing model determines how much education cost is shifted to students and families versus absorbed by public subsidy, endowment, donors, or the institution. [3] context State University of New York's public governance materials do not show ordinary faculty, staff, or student workers holding full binding democratic control over the institution. [4] context State University of New York's access model affects people seeking credentials, retraining, transfer pathways, career mobility, or adult education during economically vulnerable periods. [5] context State University of New York's public model shows whether the institution absorbs education cost through public subsidy, endowment, philanthropy, or low tuition, or instead passes risk to students through tuition bills and debt exposure. [6] context State University of New York operates in credential markets where students face asymmetric information, switching costs, sunk credits, admissions pressure, and debt-financed purchasing decisions. [7] context State University of New York's core service has real education, research, transfer, workforce, medical, or public-service value, but integrity depends on access, quality, cost, academic freedom, and student outcomes. [8] context State University of New York's scale makes its decisions consequential for students, workers, public budgets, local communities, patients, research subjects, or credential markets. [9]
Governance ? Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.	5 / 10	State University of New York's public record gives limited direct evidence about whether binding authority sits with regents, trustees, elected/public bodies, governors, executives, or private owners rather than with students and ordinary workers. State University of New York's public record gives limited direct evidence about whether binding authority sits with regents, trustees, elected/public bodies, governors, executives, or private owners rather than with students and ordinary workers. On Governance, State University of New York sits in the middle: the institution has real education or research value and some public or nonprofit constraint, but students and ordinary workers still do not control price, admissions, curriculum, discipline, labor policy, or institutional priorities. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Higher-education expansion batch calibrated across public research universities, private elite universities, online universities, community colleges, work colleges, and for-profit colleges. Linked evidence context State University of New York's public record identifies it as a public, private nonprofit, for-profit, community-college, land-grant, or online higher-education institution. [1] State University of New York's public record shows whether binding authority sits with regents, trustees, elected/public bodies, governors, executives, or private owners rather than with students and ordinary workers. [2] context State University of New York's tuition, fee, aid, no-tuition, or online-pricing model determines how much education cost is shifted to students and families versus absorbed by public subsidy, endowment, donors, or the institution. [3] context State University of New York's public governance materials do not show ordinary faculty, staff, or student workers holding full binding democratic control over the institution. [4] context State University of New York's access model affects people seeking credentials, retraining, transfer pathways, career mobility, or adult education during economically vulnerable periods. [5] context State University of New York's public model shows whether the institution absorbs education cost through public subsidy, endowment, philanthropy, or low tuition, or instead passes risk to students through tuition bills and debt exposure. [6] context State University of New York operates in credential markets where students face asymmetric information, switching costs, sunk credits, admissions pressure, and debt-financed purchasing decisions. [7] context State University of New York's core service has real education, research, transfer, workforce, medical, or public-service value, but integrity depends on access, quality, cost, academic freedom, and student outcomes. [8] context State University of New York's scale makes its decisions consequential for students, workers, public budgets, local communities, patients, research subjects, or credential markets. [9]
Extraction ? Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.	7 / 10	State University of New York's tuition, fee, aid, no-tuition, or online-pricing model determines how much education cost is shifted to students and families versus absorbed by public subsidy, endowment, donors, or the institution. State University of New York's tuition, fee, aid, no-tuition, or online-pricing model determines how much education cost is shifted to students and families versus absorbed by public subsidy, endowment, donors, or the institution. On Extraction, State University of New York belongs high for higher education because public, low-cost, no-tuition, or community-college design moves more value toward students and communities. It remains below democratic worker/member institutions where students and workers would hold direct binding control. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Higher-education expansion batch calibrated across public research universities, private elite universities, online universities, community colleges, work colleges, and for-profit colleges. Linked evidence context State University of New York's public record identifies it as a public, private nonprofit, for-profit, community-college, land-grant, or online higher-education institution. [1] context State University of New York's public record shows whether binding authority sits with regents, trustees, elected/public bodies, governors, executives, or private owners rather than with students and ordinary workers. [2] State University of New York's tuition, fee, aid, no-tuition, or online-pricing model determines how much education cost is shifted to students and families versus absorbed by public subsidy, endowment, donors, or the institution. [3] context State University of New York's public governance materials do not show ordinary faculty, staff, or student workers holding full binding democratic control over the institution. [4] context State University of New York's access model affects people seeking credentials, retraining, transfer pathways, career mobility, or adult education during economically vulnerable periods. [5] context State University of New York's public model shows whether the institution absorbs education cost through public subsidy, endowment, philanthropy, or low tuition, or instead passes risk to students through tuition bills and debt exposure. [6] context State University of New York operates in credential markets where students face asymmetric information, switching costs, sunk credits, admissions pressure, and debt-financed purchasing decisions. [7] context State University of New York's core service has real education, research, transfer, workforce, medical, or public-service value, but integrity depends on access, quality, cost, academic freedom, and student outcomes. [8] context State University of New York's scale makes its decisions consequential for students, workers, public budgets, local communities, patients, research subjects, or credential markets. [9]
Labor Sovereignty ? Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.	5 / 7	State University of New York's public governance materials do not show ordinary faculty, staff, or student workers holding full binding democratic control over the institution. State University of New York's public governance materials do not show ordinary faculty, staff, or student workers holding full binding democratic control over the institution. On Labor Sovereignty, State University of New York sits in the middle: the institution has real education or research value and some public or nonprofit constraint, but students and ordinary workers still do not control price, admissions, curriculum, discipline, labor policy, or institutional priorities. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Higher-education expansion batch calibrated across public research universities, private elite universities, online universities, community colleges, work colleges, and for-profit colleges. Linked evidence context State University of New York's public record identifies it as a public, private nonprofit, for-profit, community-college, land-grant, or online higher-education institution. [1] context State University of New York's public record shows whether binding authority sits with regents, trustees, elected/public bodies, governors, executives, or private owners rather than with students and ordinary workers. [2] context State University of New York's tuition, fee, aid, no-tuition, or online-pricing model determines how much education cost is shifted to students and families versus absorbed by public subsidy, endowment, donors, or the institution. [3] State University of New York's public governance materials do not show ordinary faculty, staff, or student workers holding full binding democratic control over the institution. [4] context State University of New York's access model affects people seeking credentials, retraining, transfer pathways, career mobility, or adult education during economically vulnerable periods. [5] context State University of New York's public model shows whether the institution absorbs education cost through public subsidy, endowment, philanthropy, or low tuition, or instead passes risk to students through tuition bills and debt exposure. [6] context State University of New York operates in credential markets where students face asymmetric information, switching costs, sunk credits, admissions pressure, and debt-financed purchasing decisions. [7] context State University of New York's core service has real education, research, transfer, workforce, medical, or public-service value, but integrity depends on access, quality, cost, academic freedom, and student outcomes. [8] context State University of New York's scale makes its decisions consequential for students, workers, public budgets, local communities, patients, research subjects, or credential markets. [9]
Solidarity with the Unemployed ? Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.	7 / 7	State University of New York's access model affects people seeking credentials, retraining, transfer pathways, career mobility, or adult education during economically vulnerable periods. State University of New York's access model affects people seeking credentials, retraining, transfer pathways, career mobility, or adult education during economically vulnerable periods. On Solidarity with the Unemployed, State University of New York belongs high for higher education because public, low-cost, no-tuition, or community-college design moves more value toward students and communities. It remains below democratic worker/member institutions where students and workers would hold direct binding control. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Higher-education expansion batch calibrated across public research universities, private elite universities, online universities, community colleges, work colleges, and for-profit colleges. Linked evidence context State University of New York's public record identifies it as a public, private nonprofit, for-profit, community-college, land-grant, or online higher-education institution. [1] context State University of New York's public record shows whether binding authority sits with regents, trustees, elected/public bodies, governors, executives, or private owners rather than with students and ordinary workers. [2] context State University of New York's tuition, fee, aid, no-tuition, or online-pricing model determines how much education cost is shifted to students and families versus absorbed by public subsidy, endowment, donors, or the institution. [3] context State University of New York's public governance materials do not show ordinary faculty, staff, or student workers holding full binding democratic control over the institution. [4] State University of New York's access model affects people seeking credentials, retraining, transfer pathways, career mobility, or adult education during economically vulnerable periods. [5] context State University of New York's public model shows whether the institution absorbs education cost through public subsidy, endowment, philanthropy, or low tuition, or instead passes risk to students through tuition bills and debt exposure. [6] context State University of New York operates in credential markets where students face asymmetric information, switching costs, sunk credits, admissions pressure, and debt-financed purchasing decisions. [7] context State University of New York's core service has real education, research, transfer, workforce, medical, or public-service value, but integrity depends on access, quality, cost, academic freedom, and student outcomes. [8] context State University of New York's scale makes its decisions consequential for students, workers, public budgets, local communities, patients, research subjects, or credential markets. [9]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity ? Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.	5 / 7	State University of New York's public model shows whether the institution absorbs education cost through public subsidy, endowment, philanthropy, or low tuition, or instead passes risk to students through tuition bills and debt exposure. State University of New York's public model shows whether the institution absorbs education cost through public subsidy, endowment, philanthropy, or low tuition, or instead passes risk to students through tuition bills and debt exposure. On Loss-Bearing Fidelity, State University of New York sits in the middle: the institution has real education or research value and some public or nonprofit constraint, but students and ordinary workers still do not control price, admissions, curriculum, discipline, labor policy, or institutional priorities. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Higher-education expansion batch calibrated across public research universities, private elite universities, online universities, community colleges, work colleges, and for-profit colleges. Linked evidence context State University of New York's public record identifies it as a public, private nonprofit, for-profit, community-college, land-grant, or online higher-education institution. [1] context State University of New York's public record shows whether binding authority sits with regents, trustees, elected/public bodies, governors, executives, or private owners rather than with students and ordinary workers. [2] context State University of New York's tuition, fee, aid, no-tuition, or online-pricing model determines how much education cost is shifted to students and families versus absorbed by public subsidy, endowment, donors, or the institution. [3] context State University of New York's public governance materials do not show ordinary faculty, staff, or student workers holding full binding democratic control over the institution. [4] context State University of New York's access model affects people seeking credentials, retraining, transfer pathways, career mobility, or adult education during economically vulnerable periods. [5] State University of New York's public model shows whether the institution absorbs education cost through public subsidy, endowment, philanthropy, or low tuition, or instead passes risk to students through tuition bills and debt exposure. [6] context State University of New York operates in credential markets where students face asymmetric information, switching costs, sunk credits, admissions pressure, and debt-financed purchasing decisions. [7] context State University of New York's core service has real education, research, transfer, workforce, medical, or public-service value, but integrity depends on access, quality, cost, academic freedom, and student outcomes. [8] context State University of New York's scale makes its decisions consequential for students, workers, public budgets, local communities, patients, research subjects, or credential markets. [9]
Market Conduct ? Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.	4 / 5	State University of New York operates in credential markets where students face asymmetric information, switching costs, sunk credits, admissions pressure, and debt-financed purchasing decisions. State University of New York operates in credential markets where students face asymmetric information, switching costs, sunk credits, admissions pressure, and debt-financed purchasing decisions. On Market Conduct, State University of New York sits in the middle: the institution has real education or research value and some public or nonprofit constraint, but students and ordinary workers still do not control price, admissions, curriculum, discipline, labor policy, or institutional priorities. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Higher-education expansion batch calibrated across public research universities, private elite universities, online universities, community colleges, work colleges, and for-profit colleges. Linked evidence context State University of New York's public record identifies it as a public, private nonprofit, for-profit, community-college, land-grant, or online higher-education institution. [1] context State University of New York's public record shows whether binding authority sits with regents, trustees, elected/public bodies, governors, executives, or private owners rather than with students and ordinary workers. [2] context State University of New York's tuition, fee, aid, no-tuition, or online-pricing model determines how much education cost is shifted to students and families versus absorbed by public subsidy, endowment, donors, or the institution. [3] context State University of New York's public governance materials do not show ordinary faculty, staff, or student workers holding full binding democratic control over the institution. [4] context State University of New York's access model affects people seeking credentials, retraining, transfer pathways, career mobility, or adult education during economically vulnerable periods. [5] context State University of New York's public model shows whether the institution absorbs education cost through public subsidy, endowment, philanthropy, or low tuition, or instead passes risk to students through tuition bills and debt exposure. [6] State University of New York operates in credential markets where students face asymmetric information, switching costs, sunk credits, admissions pressure, and debt-financed purchasing decisions. [7] context State University of New York's core service has real education, research, transfer, workforce, medical, or public-service value, but integrity depends on access, quality, cost, academic freedom, and student outcomes. [8] context State University of New York's scale makes its decisions consequential for students, workers, public budgets, local communities, patients, research subjects, or credential markets. [9]
Product Integrity ? Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.	5 / 5	State University of New York's core service has real education, research, transfer, workforce, medical, or public-service value, but integrity depends on access, quality, cost, academic freedom, and student outcomes. State University of New York's core service has real education, research, transfer, workforce, medical, or public-service value, but integrity depends on access, quality, cost, academic freedom, and student outcomes. On Product Integrity, State University of New York sits in the middle: the institution has real education or research value and some public or nonprofit constraint, but students and ordinary workers still do not control price, admissions, curriculum, discipline, labor policy, or institutional priorities. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Higher-education expansion batch calibrated across public research universities, private elite universities, online universities, community colleges, work colleges, and for-profit colleges. Linked evidence context State University of New York's public record identifies it as a public, private nonprofit, for-profit, community-college, land-grant, or online higher-education institution. [1] context State University of New York's public record shows whether binding authority sits with regents, trustees, elected/public bodies, governors, executives, or private owners rather than with students and ordinary workers. [2] context State University of New York's tuition, fee, aid, no-tuition, or online-pricing model determines how much education cost is shifted to students and families versus absorbed by public subsidy, endowment, donors, or the institution. [3] context State University of New York's public governance materials do not show ordinary faculty, staff, or student workers holding full binding democratic control over the institution. [4] context State University of New York's access model affects people seeking credentials, retraining, transfer pathways, career mobility, or adult education during economically vulnerable periods. [5] context State University of New York's public model shows whether the institution absorbs education cost through public subsidy, endowment, philanthropy, or low tuition, or instead passes risk to students through tuition bills and debt exposure. [6] context State University of New York operates in credential markets where students face asymmetric information, switching costs, sunk credits, admissions pressure, and debt-financed purchasing decisions. [7] State University of New York's core service has real education, research, transfer, workforce, medical, or public-service value, but integrity depends on access, quality, cost, academic freedom, and student outcomes. [8] context State University of New York's scale makes its decisions consequential for students, workers, public budgets, local communities, patients, research subjects, or credential markets. [9]
Scale Integrity ? Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.	5 / 5	State University of New York's scale makes its decisions consequential for students, workers, public budgets, local communities, patients, research subjects, or credential markets. State University of New York's scale makes its decisions consequential for students, workers, public budgets, local communities, patients, research subjects, or credential markets. On Scale Integrity, State University of New York sits in the middle: the institution has real education or research value and some public or nonprofit constraint, but students and ordinary workers still do not control price, admissions, curriculum, discipline, labor policy, or institutional priorities. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Higher-education expansion batch calibrated across public research universities, private elite universities, online universities, community colleges, work colleges, and for-profit colleges. Linked evidence context State University of New York's public record identifies it as a public, private nonprofit, for-profit, community-college, land-grant, or online higher-education institution. [1] context State University of New York's public record shows whether binding authority sits with regents, trustees, elected/public bodies, governors, executives, or private owners rather than with students and ordinary workers. [2] context State University of New York's tuition, fee, aid, no-tuition, or online-pricing model determines how much education cost is shifted to students and families versus absorbed by public subsidy, endowment, donors, or the institution. [3] context State University of New York's public governance materials do not show ordinary faculty, staff, or student workers holding full binding democratic control over the institution. [4] context State University of New York's access model affects people seeking credentials, retraining, transfer pathways, career mobility, or adult education during economically vulnerable periods. [5] context State University of New York's public model shows whether the institution absorbs education cost through public subsidy, endowment, philanthropy, or low tuition, or instead passes risk to students through tuition bills and debt exposure. [6] context State University of New York operates in credential markets where students face asymmetric information, switching costs, sunk credits, admissions pressure, and debt-financed purchasing decisions. [7] context State University of New York's core service has real education, research, transfer, workforce, medical, or public-service value, but integrity depends on access, quality, cost, academic freedom, and student outcomes. [8] State University of New York's scale makes its decisions consequential for students, workers, public budgets, local communities, patients, research subjects, or credential markets. [9]

Penalties

Penalty	Applied	Why this penalty
Ecological Harm ? Footprint, trajectory, irreversibility, culpability, and scale, including whether ecological harm is central to the model and continued after credible notice. Range: -30 to 0.	-3	State University of New York's public record makes Ecological Harm relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research, campus… State University of New York's public record makes Ecological Harm relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research, campus footprint, lobbying, online monitoring, identity formation, or institutional neutrality claims. This warrants a Ecological Harm penalty because the evidence connects the institution's actual model to cost shifting, debt exposure, animal research, ecological footprint, policy influence, surveillance, identity pressure, or neutrality theater. The value is calibrated against other higher-education entries rather than assigned automatically to the whole sector. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Higher-education expansion batch calibrated across public research universities, private elite universities, online universities, community colleges, work colleges, and for-profit colleges. Linked evidence State University of New York's public record makes Ecological Harm relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research, campus footprint, lobbying, online monitoring, identity formation, or institutional neutrality claims. [10]
Animal Testing ? Direct animal testing, contract animal testing, animal-testing-dependent product development, or business lines where current safety/regulatory approval normally relies on animal experiments. Stronger penalties apply where animal testing is core, repeated, non-optional, or avoidable; documented cruelty-free or non-animal methods reduce or eliminate the penalty. Range: -8 to 0.	-5	State University of New York's public record makes Animal Testing relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research, campus… State University of New York's public record makes Animal Testing relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research, campus footprint, lobbying, online monitoring, identity formation, or institutional neutrality claims. This warrants a Animal Testing penalty because the evidence connects the institution's actual model to cost shifting, debt exposure, animal research, ecological footprint, policy influence, surveillance, identity pressure, or neutrality theater. The value is calibrated against other higher-education entries rather than assigned automatically to the whole sector. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Higher-education expansion batch calibrated across public research universities, private elite universities, online universities, community colleges, work colleges, and for-profit colleges. Linked evidence State University of New York's public record makes Animal Testing relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research, campus footprint, lobbying, online monitoring, identity formation, or institutional neutrality claims. [11]
Accountability Opacity ? Material opacity, reputation laundering, or hidden accountability structures that prevent public accountability. Range: -2 to 0.	-2	State University of New York's public record makes Accountability Opacity relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research,… State University of New York's public record makes Accountability Opacity relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research, campus footprint, lobbying, online monitoring, identity formation, or institutional neutrality claims. This warrants a Accountability Opacity penalty because the evidence connects the institution's actual model to cost shifting, debt exposure, animal research, ecological footprint, policy influence, surveillance, identity pressure, or neutrality theater. The value is calibrated against other higher-education entries rather than assigned automatically to the whole sector. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Higher-education expansion batch calibrated across public research universities, private elite universities, online universities, community colleges, work colleges, and for-profit colleges. Linked evidence State University of New York's public record makes Accountability Opacity relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research, campus footprint, lobbying, online monitoring, identity formation, or institutional neutrality claims. [12]
Surveillance Capture ? Invasive surveillance, unreasonably non-optional tracking, facial recognition, biometric identification, or AI behavior scanning of customers, workers, bystanders, or the public. Range: -5 to 0.	-1	State University of New York's public record makes Surveillance Capture relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research,… State University of New York's public record makes Surveillance Capture relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research, campus footprint, lobbying, online monitoring, identity formation, or institutional neutrality claims. This warrants a Surveillance Capture penalty because the evidence connects the institution's actual model to cost shifting, debt exposure, animal research, ecological footprint, policy influence, surveillance, identity pressure, or neutrality theater. The value is calibrated against other higher-education entries rather than assigned automatically to the whole sector. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Higher-education expansion batch calibrated across public research universities, private elite universities, online universities, community colleges, work colleges, and for-profit colleges. Linked evidence State University of New York's public record makes Surveillance Capture relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research, campus footprint, lobbying, online monitoring, identity formation, or institutional neutrality claims. [13]
Ideological Disavowal ? Concealed ideology presented as neutrality, expertise, professional necessity, public-service administration, market inevitability, or non-ideological common sense while exercising power. Range: -3 to 0.	-2	State University of New York's public record makes Ideological Disavowal relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research,… State University of New York's public record makes Ideological Disavowal relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research, campus footprint, lobbying, online monitoring, identity formation, or institutional neutrality claims. This warrants a Ideological Disavowal penalty because the evidence connects the institution's actual model to cost shifting, debt exposure, animal research, ecological footprint, policy influence, surveillance, identity pressure, or neutrality theater. The value is calibrated against other higher-education entries rather than assigned automatically to the whole sector. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Higher-education expansion batch calibrated across public research universities, private elite universities, online universities, community colleges, work colleges, and for-profit colleges. Linked evidence State University of New York's public record makes Ideological Disavowal relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research, campus footprint, lobbying, online monitoring, identity formation, or institutional neutrality claims. [14]

Bonus Credits

No bonus credits applied in this version.

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

High 85/100

14 verified linked claims 14 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 14/14 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 16/20

14 verified linked claims

Source quality 16/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 14/18

14 direct claims across 14 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 10/10

14/14 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending

VerificationUnverified

ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)

ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)

Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.

Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

1State University of New York's public record identifies it as a public, private nonprofit, for-profit, community-college, land-grant, or online higher-education institution.

Ownership Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

SUNY Board of TrusteesPrimary institutional record · 90%

2State University of New York's public record shows whether binding authority sits with regents, trustees, elected/public bodies, governors, executives, or private owners rather than with students and ordinary workers.

Governance Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

SUNY Board of TrusteesPrimary institutional record · 90%

3State University of New York's tuition, fee, aid, no-tuition, or online-pricing model determines how much education cost is shifted to students and families versus absorbed by public subsidy, endowment, donors, or the institution.

Extraction Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

SUNY 101Primary institutional record · 90%

4State University of New York's public governance materials do not show ordinary faculty, staff, or student workers holding full binding democratic control over the institution.

Labor Sovereignty Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

SUNY Board of TrusteesPrimary institutional record · 90%

5State University of New York's access model affects people seeking credentials, retraining, transfer pathways, career mobility, or adult education during economically vulnerable periods.

Solidarity Unemployed Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

SUNY 101Primary institutional record · 90%

6State University of New York's public model shows whether the institution absorbs education cost through public subsidy, endowment, philanthropy, or low tuition, or instead passes risk to students through tuition bills and debt exposure.

Loss Bearing Fidelity Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

SUNY 101Primary institutional record · 90%

7State University of New York operates in credential markets where students face asymmetric information, switching costs, sunk credits, admissions pressure, and debt-financed purchasing decisions.

Market Conduct Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

SUNY tuition and feesPrimary institutional record · 90%

8State University of New York's core service has real education, research, transfer, workforce, medical, or public-service value, but integrity depends on access, quality, cost, academic freedom, and student outcomes.

Product Integrity Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

SUNY Board of TrusteesPrimary institutional record · 90%

9State University of New York's scale makes its decisions consequential for students, workers, public budgets, local communities, patients, research subjects, or credential markets.

Scale Integrity Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

SUNY Board of TrusteesPrimary institutional record · 90%

10State University of New York's public record makes Ecological Harm relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research, campus footprint, lobbying, online monitoring, identity formation, or institutional neutrality claims.

Ecological Harm Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

SUNY tuition and feesPrimary institutional record · 90%

11State University of New York's public record makes Animal Testing relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research, campus footprint, lobbying, online monitoring, identity formation, or institutional neutrality claims.

Animal Testing Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

SUNY tuition and feesPrimary institutional record · 90%

12State University of New York's public record makes Accountability Opacity relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research, campus footprint, lobbying, online monitoring, identity formation, or institutional neutrality claims.

Accountability Opacity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

SUNY tuition and feesPrimary institutional record · 90%

13State University of New York's public record makes Surveillance Capture relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research, campus footprint, lobbying, online monitoring, identity formation, or institutional neutrality claims.

Surveillance Capture Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

SUNY tuition and feesPrimary institutional record · 90%

14State University of New York's public record makes Ideological Disavowal relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research, campus footprint, lobbying, online monitoring, identity formation, or institutional neutrality claims.

Ideological Disavowal Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

SUNY tuition and feesPrimary institutional record · 90%

Alternatives

Competitors

AGOOD54 Berea College private nonprofit work college · same market AGOOD52 Maricopa Community Colleges public community-college system · same market AGOOD51 Miami Dade College public college · same market AGOOD51 Seattle Colleges public community-college district · same market AGOOD50 Bellevue College public college · same market BQUALIFIED49 Dallas College public community-college system · same market BQUALIFIED46 Western Governors University nonprofit online university · same market CPERFORMATIVE35 The Ohio State University public land-grant research university · same market

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for State University of New York Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.

View Full Audit Log