nonprofit medically tailored meal organization

Revive & Thrive Project

Industry Food

A nonprofit prepared-meal organization delivering medically tailored and culturally responsive meals for people facing serious illness or food insecurity. Revive & Thrive Project scores high because it uses prepared-meal capacity to absorb vulnerability and support care rather than sell convenience subscriptions.

Why this matters: Revive & Thrive is a high-scoring meal-delivery reference point because the meal is a care intervention, not a consumer trap.

Letter grade A Good High confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1 Last reviewed May 13, 2026

Final Score 51* A - Good

AGOOD51 pts

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material49

Bonus+4

Cap66No structure cap

After Cap53

Penalties-2

Small business context

This entry is classified as a small business using observable scale signals: independent control, local or limited operations, and no evidence of public-company or national-chain scale. The small-business calibration keeps the ordinary rubric but reads evidence at person scale: living-wage pricing is not extraction by itself, while worker and contractor treatment, owner surplus, transparency, advertising pressure, dissent tolerance, and recourse matter more. Harm, toxicity, surveillance, labor, coercion, opacity, and hidden-parent penalties are not relaxed.

Applied cap: No structure cap

!Not Verified

Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Evaluation Overview

A - Good

The score turns mainly on Extraction, with the largest penalty coming from High-Carbon Products.

Strengths

Extraction7/10
Solidarity with the Unemployed7/7
Loss-Bearing Fidelity7/7

Penalties

High-Carbon Products-1
Subscription Capture-1

Evidence state

ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Linked claims13
Direct axis claims13
Coverage13/13

Scoring Axes

Axis	Score	Why this score
Ownership ? Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.	5 / 10	Revive & Thrive Project's public record identifies its ownership, parent relationship, or institutional form in the meal-kit, prepared-meal, or food-delivery market. Revive & Thrive Project's public record identifies its ownership, parent relationship, or institutional form in the meal-kit, prepared-meal, or food-delivery market. On Ownership, Revive & Thrive Project sits in the positive middle: the service provides real meal-planning or prepared-food utility and shows some mission, sourcing, product, or local-chef strength. It remains below the cooperative kitchens because customers and workers still do not hold binding control over the institution. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Meal-delivery expansion calibrated across worker-owned community kitchens, local farmer-supported prepared meals, plant-forward subscriptions, organic meal kits, parent-owned meal-kit brands, and food-platform consolidators. Linked evidence Revive & Thrive Project's public record identifies its ownership, parent relationship, or institutional form in the meal-kit, prepared-meal, or food-delivery market. [1] context Revive & Thrive Project's public materials show whether control is held by workers, a cooperative kitchen, founders, a private platform, a public company, or a parent food group. [2] context Revive & Thrive Project's model determines whether meal value is routed through cooperative kitchens, local farmers, public-benefit food work, private subscriptions, or platform scale. [3] context Revive & Thrive Project's reviewed public record shows the degree to which cooks, delivery workers, farmers, chefs, or ordinary employees have binding power rather than vendor or employment dependence. [4] context Revive & Thrive Project's service affects access to prepared food, home cooking, disability-friendly meal support, local farmer demand, chef income, or lower-friction meal planning. [5] context Revive & Thrive Project's public model affects whether spoilage, missed delivery, food-safety, cancellation, packaging, and meal-selection risks are absorbed by the institution or shifted to customers and workers. [6] context Revive & Thrive Project operates in a market where customers often face recurring orders, changing menus, plan deadlines, delivery windows, shipping fees, and freshness uncertainty. [7] context Revive & Thrive Project's core product integrity depends on ingredient quality, prepared-food safety, nutritional quality, packaging, accurate menus, and whether convenience improves or degrades ordinary meals. [8] context Revive & Thrive Project's scale, distribution network, platform role, or local-kitchen model affects whether growth strengthens food access or turns meals into a consolidated private subscription system. [9]
Governance ? Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.	6 / 10	Revive & Thrive Project's linked public materials show whether control is held by workers, a cooperative kitchen, founders, a private platform, a public company, or a parent food group. Revive & Thrive Project's linked public materials show whether control is held by workers, a cooperative kitchen, founders, a private platform, a public company, or a parent food group. On Governance, Revive & Thrive Project sits in the positive middle: the service provides real meal-planning or prepared-food utility and shows some mission, sourcing, product, or local-chef strength. It remains below the cooperative kitchens because customers and workers still do not hold binding control over the institution. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Meal-delivery expansion calibrated across worker-owned community kitchens, local farmer-supported prepared meals, plant-forward subscriptions, organic meal kits, parent-owned meal-kit brands, and food-platform consolidators. Linked evidence context Revive & Thrive Project's public record identifies its ownership, parent relationship, or institutional form in the meal-kit, prepared-meal, or food-delivery market. [1] Revive & Thrive Project's public materials show whether control is held by workers, a cooperative kitchen, founders, a private platform, a public company, or a parent food group. [2] context Revive & Thrive Project's model determines whether meal value is routed through cooperative kitchens, local farmers, public-benefit food work, private subscriptions, or platform scale. [3] context Revive & Thrive Project's reviewed public record shows the degree to which cooks, delivery workers, farmers, chefs, or ordinary employees have binding power rather than vendor or employment dependence. [4] context Revive & Thrive Project's service affects access to prepared food, home cooking, disability-friendly meal support, local farmer demand, chef income, or lower-friction meal planning. [5] context Revive & Thrive Project's public model affects whether spoilage, missed delivery, food-safety, cancellation, packaging, and meal-selection risks are absorbed by the institution or shifted to customers and workers. [6] context Revive & Thrive Project operates in a market where customers often face recurring orders, changing menus, plan deadlines, delivery windows, shipping fees, and freshness uncertainty. [7] context Revive & Thrive Project's core product integrity depends on ingredient quality, prepared-food safety, nutritional quality, packaging, accurate menus, and whether convenience improves or degrades ordinary meals. [8] context Revive & Thrive Project's scale, distribution network, platform role, or local-kitchen model affects whether growth strengthens food access or turns meals into a consolidated private subscription system. [9]
Extraction ? Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.	7 / 10	Revive & Thrive Project's model determines whether meal value is routed through cooperative kitchens, local farmers, public-benefit food work, private subscriptions, or platform scale. Revive & Thrive Project's model determines whether meal value is routed through cooperative kitchens, local farmers, public-benefit food work, private subscriptions, or platform scale. On Extraction, Revive & Thrive Project sits near the top of this category because meal convenience is tied to worker control, community support, local food stewardship, or direct farmer support instead of being captured mainly by outside investors. The value remains below perfect where the model is small, geographically narrow, or only partially democratic. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Meal-delivery expansion calibrated across worker-owned community kitchens, local farmer-supported prepared meals, plant-forward subscriptions, organic meal kits, parent-owned meal-kit brands, and food-platform consolidators. Linked evidence context Revive & Thrive Project's public record identifies its ownership, parent relationship, or institutional form in the meal-kit, prepared-meal, or food-delivery market. [1] context Revive & Thrive Project's public materials show whether control is held by workers, a cooperative kitchen, founders, a private platform, a public company, or a parent food group. [2] Revive & Thrive Project's model determines whether meal value is routed through cooperative kitchens, local farmers, public-benefit food work, private subscriptions, or platform scale. [3] context Revive & Thrive Project's reviewed public record shows the degree to which cooks, delivery workers, farmers, chefs, or ordinary employees have binding power rather than vendor or employment dependence. [4] context Revive & Thrive Project's service affects access to prepared food, home cooking, disability-friendly meal support, local farmer demand, chef income, or lower-friction meal planning. [5] context Revive & Thrive Project's public model affects whether spoilage, missed delivery, food-safety, cancellation, packaging, and meal-selection risks are absorbed by the institution or shifted to customers and workers. [6] context Revive & Thrive Project operates in a market where customers often face recurring orders, changing menus, plan deadlines, delivery windows, shipping fees, and freshness uncertainty. [7] context Revive & Thrive Project's core product integrity depends on ingredient quality, prepared-food safety, nutritional quality, packaging, accurate menus, and whether convenience improves or degrades ordinary meals. [8] context Revive & Thrive Project's scale, distribution network, platform role, or local-kitchen model affects whether growth strengthens food access or turns meals into a consolidated private subscription system. [9]
Labor Sovereignty ? Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.	4 / 7	Revive & Thrive Project's reviewed public record shows the degree to which cooks, delivery workers, farmers, chefs, or ordinary employees have binding power rather than vendor or employment dependence. Revive & Thrive Project's reviewed public record shows the degree to which cooks, delivery workers, farmers, chefs, or ordinary employees have binding power rather than vendor or employment dependence. On Labor Sovereignty, Revive & Thrive Project sits in the positive middle: the service provides real meal-planning or prepared-food utility and shows some mission, sourcing, product, or local-chef strength. It remains below the cooperative kitchens because customers and workers still do not hold binding control over the institution. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Meal-delivery expansion calibrated across worker-owned community kitchens, local farmer-supported prepared meals, plant-forward subscriptions, organic meal kits, parent-owned meal-kit brands, and food-platform consolidators. Linked evidence context Revive & Thrive Project's public record identifies its ownership, parent relationship, or institutional form in the meal-kit, prepared-meal, or food-delivery market. [1] context Revive & Thrive Project's public materials show whether control is held by workers, a cooperative kitchen, founders, a private platform, a public company, or a parent food group. [2] context Revive & Thrive Project's model determines whether meal value is routed through cooperative kitchens, local farmers, public-benefit food work, private subscriptions, or platform scale. [3] Revive & Thrive Project's reviewed public record shows the degree to which cooks, delivery workers, farmers, chefs, or ordinary employees have binding power rather than vendor or employment dependence. [4] context Revive & Thrive Project's service affects access to prepared food, home cooking, disability-friendly meal support, local farmer demand, chef income, or lower-friction meal planning. [5] context Revive & Thrive Project's public model affects whether spoilage, missed delivery, food-safety, cancellation, packaging, and meal-selection risks are absorbed by the institution or shifted to customers and workers. [6] context Revive & Thrive Project operates in a market where customers often face recurring orders, changing menus, plan deadlines, delivery windows, shipping fees, and freshness uncertainty. [7] context Revive & Thrive Project's core product integrity depends on ingredient quality, prepared-food safety, nutritional quality, packaging, accurate menus, and whether convenience improves or degrades ordinary meals. [8] context Revive & Thrive Project's scale, distribution network, platform role, or local-kitchen model affects whether growth strengthens food access or turns meals into a consolidated private subscription system. [9]
Solidarity with the Unemployed ? Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.	7 / 7	Revive & Thrive Project's service affects access to prepared food, home cooking, disability-friendly meal support, local farmer demand, chef income, or lower-friction meal planning. Revive & Thrive Project's service affects access to prepared food, home cooking, disability-friendly meal support, local farmer demand, chef income, or lower-friction meal planning. On Solidarity with the Unemployed, Revive & Thrive Project sits near the top of this category because meal convenience is tied to worker control, community support, local food stewardship, or direct farmer support instead of being captured mainly by outside investors. The value remains below perfect where the model is small, geographically narrow, or only partially democratic. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Meal-delivery expansion calibrated across worker-owned community kitchens, local farmer-supported prepared meals, plant-forward subscriptions, organic meal kits, parent-owned meal-kit brands, and food-platform consolidators. Linked evidence context Revive & Thrive Project's public record identifies its ownership, parent relationship, or institutional form in the meal-kit, prepared-meal, or food-delivery market. [1] context Revive & Thrive Project's public materials show whether control is held by workers, a cooperative kitchen, founders, a private platform, a public company, or a parent food group. [2] context Revive & Thrive Project's model determines whether meal value is routed through cooperative kitchens, local farmers, public-benefit food work, private subscriptions, or platform scale. [3] context Revive & Thrive Project's reviewed public record shows the degree to which cooks, delivery workers, farmers, chefs, or ordinary employees have binding power rather than vendor or employment dependence. [4] Revive & Thrive Project's service affects access to prepared food, home cooking, disability-friendly meal support, local farmer demand, chef income, or lower-friction meal planning. [5] context Revive & Thrive Project's public model affects whether spoilage, missed delivery, food-safety, cancellation, packaging, and meal-selection risks are absorbed by the institution or shifted to customers and workers. [6] context Revive & Thrive Project operates in a market where customers often face recurring orders, changing menus, plan deadlines, delivery windows, shipping fees, and freshness uncertainty. [7] context Revive & Thrive Project's core product integrity depends on ingredient quality, prepared-food safety, nutritional quality, packaging, accurate menus, and whether convenience improves or degrades ordinary meals. [8] context Revive & Thrive Project's scale, distribution network, platform role, or local-kitchen model affects whether growth strengthens food access or turns meals into a consolidated private subscription system. [9]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity ? Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.	7 / 7	Revive & Thrive Project's public model affects whether spoilage, missed delivery, food-safety, cancellation, packaging, and meal-selection risks are absorbed by the institution or shifted to customers and workers. Revive & Thrive Project's public model affects whether spoilage, missed delivery, food-safety, cancellation, packaging, and meal-selection risks are absorbed by the institution or shifted to customers and workers. On Loss-Bearing Fidelity, Revive & Thrive Project sits near the top of this category because meal convenience is tied to worker control, community support, local food stewardship, or direct farmer support instead of being captured mainly by outside investors. The value remains below perfect where the model is small, geographically narrow, or only partially democratic. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Meal-delivery expansion calibrated across worker-owned community kitchens, local farmer-supported prepared meals, plant-forward subscriptions, organic meal kits, parent-owned meal-kit brands, and food-platform consolidators. Linked evidence context Revive & Thrive Project's public record identifies its ownership, parent relationship, or institutional form in the meal-kit, prepared-meal, or food-delivery market. [1] context Revive & Thrive Project's public materials show whether control is held by workers, a cooperative kitchen, founders, a private platform, a public company, or a parent food group. [2] context Revive & Thrive Project's model determines whether meal value is routed through cooperative kitchens, local farmers, public-benefit food work, private subscriptions, or platform scale. [3] context Revive & Thrive Project's reviewed public record shows the degree to which cooks, delivery workers, farmers, chefs, or ordinary employees have binding power rather than vendor or employment dependence. [4] context Revive & Thrive Project's service affects access to prepared food, home cooking, disability-friendly meal support, local farmer demand, chef income, or lower-friction meal planning. [5] Revive & Thrive Project's public model affects whether spoilage, missed delivery, food-safety, cancellation, packaging, and meal-selection risks are absorbed by the institution or shifted to customers and workers. [6] context Revive & Thrive Project operates in a market where customers often face recurring orders, changing menus, plan deadlines, delivery windows, shipping fees, and freshness uncertainty. [7] context Revive & Thrive Project's core product integrity depends on ingredient quality, prepared-food safety, nutritional quality, packaging, accurate menus, and whether convenience improves or degrades ordinary meals. [8] context Revive & Thrive Project's scale, distribution network, platform role, or local-kitchen model affects whether growth strengthens food access or turns meals into a consolidated private subscription system. [9]
Market Conduct ? Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.	5 / 5	Revive & Thrive Project operates in a market where customers often face recurring orders, changing menus, plan deadlines, delivery windows, shipping fees, and freshness uncertainty. Revive & Thrive Project operates in a market where customers often face recurring orders, changing menus, plan deadlines, delivery windows, shipping fees, and freshness uncertainty. On Market Conduct, Revive & Thrive Project sits in the positive middle: the service provides real meal-planning or prepared-food utility and shows some mission, sourcing, product, or local-chef strength. It remains below the cooperative kitchens because customers and workers still do not hold binding control over the institution. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Meal-delivery expansion calibrated across worker-owned community kitchens, local farmer-supported prepared meals, plant-forward subscriptions, organic meal kits, parent-owned meal-kit brands, and food-platform consolidators. Linked evidence context Revive & Thrive Project's public record identifies its ownership, parent relationship, or institutional form in the meal-kit, prepared-meal, or food-delivery market. [1] context Revive & Thrive Project's public materials show whether control is held by workers, a cooperative kitchen, founders, a private platform, a public company, or a parent food group. [2] context Revive & Thrive Project's model determines whether meal value is routed through cooperative kitchens, local farmers, public-benefit food work, private subscriptions, or platform scale. [3] context Revive & Thrive Project's reviewed public record shows the degree to which cooks, delivery workers, farmers, chefs, or ordinary employees have binding power rather than vendor or employment dependence. [4] context Revive & Thrive Project's service affects access to prepared food, home cooking, disability-friendly meal support, local farmer demand, chef income, or lower-friction meal planning. [5] context Revive & Thrive Project's public model affects whether spoilage, missed delivery, food-safety, cancellation, packaging, and meal-selection risks are absorbed by the institution or shifted to customers and workers. [6] Revive & Thrive Project operates in a market where customers often face recurring orders, changing menus, plan deadlines, delivery windows, shipping fees, and freshness uncertainty. [7] context Revive & Thrive Project's core product integrity depends on ingredient quality, prepared-food safety, nutritional quality, packaging, accurate menus, and whether convenience improves or degrades ordinary meals. [8] context Revive & Thrive Project's scale, distribution network, platform role, or local-kitchen model affects whether growth strengthens food access or turns meals into a consolidated private subscription system. [9]
Product Integrity ? Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.	5 / 5	Revive & Thrive Project's core product integrity depends on ingredient quality, prepared-food safety, nutritional quality, packaging, accurate menus, and whether convenience improves or degrades ordinary meals. Revive & Thrive Project's core product integrity depends on ingredient quality, prepared-food safety, nutritional quality, packaging, accurate menus, and whether convenience improves or degrades ordinary meals. On Product Integrity, Revive & Thrive Project sits in the positive middle: the service provides real meal-planning or prepared-food utility and shows some mission, sourcing, product, or local-chef strength. It remains below the cooperative kitchens because customers and workers still do not hold binding control over the institution. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Meal-delivery expansion calibrated across worker-owned community kitchens, local farmer-supported prepared meals, plant-forward subscriptions, organic meal kits, parent-owned meal-kit brands, and food-platform consolidators. Linked evidence context Revive & Thrive Project's public record identifies its ownership, parent relationship, or institutional form in the meal-kit, prepared-meal, or food-delivery market. [1] context Revive & Thrive Project's public materials show whether control is held by workers, a cooperative kitchen, founders, a private platform, a public company, or a parent food group. [2] context Revive & Thrive Project's model determines whether meal value is routed through cooperative kitchens, local farmers, public-benefit food work, private subscriptions, or platform scale. [3] context Revive & Thrive Project's reviewed public record shows the degree to which cooks, delivery workers, farmers, chefs, or ordinary employees have binding power rather than vendor or employment dependence. [4] context Revive & Thrive Project's service affects access to prepared food, home cooking, disability-friendly meal support, local farmer demand, chef income, or lower-friction meal planning. [5] context Revive & Thrive Project's public model affects whether spoilage, missed delivery, food-safety, cancellation, packaging, and meal-selection risks are absorbed by the institution or shifted to customers and workers. [6] context Revive & Thrive Project operates in a market where customers often face recurring orders, changing menus, plan deadlines, delivery windows, shipping fees, and freshness uncertainty. [7] Revive & Thrive Project's core product integrity depends on ingredient quality, prepared-food safety, nutritional quality, packaging, accurate menus, and whether convenience improves or degrades ordinary meals. [8] context Revive & Thrive Project's scale, distribution network, platform role, or local-kitchen model affects whether growth strengthens food access or turns meals into a consolidated private subscription system. [9]
Scale Integrity ? Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.	3 / 5	Revive & Thrive Project's scale, distribution network, platform role, or local-kitchen model affects whether growth strengthens food access or turns meals into a consolidated private subscription system. Revive & Thrive Project's scale, distribution network, platform role, or local-kitchen model affects whether growth strengthens food access or turns meals into a consolidated private subscription system. On Scale Integrity, Revive & Thrive Project belongs low because ordinary food usefulness is being delivered through shareholder, parent-company, founder, or platform control. The meal service can still help customers eat, but the institutional power mostly remains private and one-sided. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Meal-delivery expansion calibrated across worker-owned community kitchens, local farmer-supported prepared meals, plant-forward subscriptions, organic meal kits, parent-owned meal-kit brands, and food-platform consolidators. Linked evidence context Revive & Thrive Project's public record identifies its ownership, parent relationship, or institutional form in the meal-kit, prepared-meal, or food-delivery market. [1] context Revive & Thrive Project's public materials show whether control is held by workers, a cooperative kitchen, founders, a private platform, a public company, or a parent food group. [2] context Revive & Thrive Project's model determines whether meal value is routed through cooperative kitchens, local farmers, public-benefit food work, private subscriptions, or platform scale. [3] context Revive & Thrive Project's reviewed public record shows the degree to which cooks, delivery workers, farmers, chefs, or ordinary employees have binding power rather than vendor or employment dependence. [4] context Revive & Thrive Project's service affects access to prepared food, home cooking, disability-friendly meal support, local farmer demand, chef income, or lower-friction meal planning. [5] context Revive & Thrive Project's public model affects whether spoilage, missed delivery, food-safety, cancellation, packaging, and meal-selection risks are absorbed by the institution or shifted to customers and workers. [6] context Revive & Thrive Project operates in a market where customers often face recurring orders, changing menus, plan deadlines, delivery windows, shipping fees, and freshness uncertainty. [7] context Revive & Thrive Project's core product integrity depends on ingredient quality, prepared-food safety, nutritional quality, packaging, accurate menus, and whether convenience improves or degrades ordinary meals. [8] Revive & Thrive Project's scale, distribution network, platform role, or local-kitchen model affects whether growth strengthens food access or turns meals into a consolidated private subscription system. [9]

Penalties

Penalty	Applied	Why this penalty
High-Carbon Products ? Core products, services, financing, or supply chains that materially depend on fossil-fuel combustion, high-emissions transport, industrial animal agriculture, meat, dairy, or other unusually carbon-intensive activity. This is scored separately from general ecological harm so ordinary consumers can see carbon-intensive product exposure directly. Range: -10 to 0.	-1	Revive & Thrive Project's public record makes High-Carbon Products relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits. Revive & Thrive Project's public record makes High-Carbon Products relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits. This creates a High-Carbon Products penalty because the risk comes from how the service sells, ships, sources, personalizes, renews, packages, or governs food. The value is limited where the evidence shows ordinary category exposure rather than severe or unavoidable harm. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Meal-delivery expansion calibrated across worker-owned community kitchens, local farmer-supported prepared meals, plant-forward subscriptions, organic meal kits, parent-owned meal-kit brands, and food-platform consolidators. Linked evidence Revive & Thrive Project's public record makes High-Carbon Products relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits. [12]
Subscription Capture ? Manipulative recurring-payment, automatic-renewal, cancellation-friction, bundling, trial-conversion, or refund designs that profit from inertia or confusion. Range: -5 to 0.	-1	Revive & Thrive Project's public record makes Subscription Capture relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits. Revive & Thrive Project's public record makes Subscription Capture relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits. This creates a Subscription Capture penalty because the risk comes from how the service sells, ships, sources, personalizes, renews, packages, or governs food. The value is limited where the evidence shows ordinary category exposure rather than severe or unavoidable harm. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Meal-delivery expansion calibrated across worker-owned community kitchens, local farmer-supported prepared meals, plant-forward subscriptions, organic meal kits, parent-owned meal-kit brands, and food-platform consolidators. Linked evidence Revive & Thrive Project's public record makes Subscription Capture relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits. [13]

Bonus Credits

Bonus	Credit	Why this credit
Good Deal ? Credit for unusually fair value: durable quality, fair pricing, low lock-in, and clear customer surplus.	3 / 3	Revive & Thrive Project's public record makes Good Deal relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits. Revive & Thrive Project's public record makes Good Deal relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits. This adds Good Deal credit because the practice creates unusual food access, transparent value, local-farmer support, chef autonomy, plant-forward substitution, or lower-waste meal planning. The credit is capped where the service is still a private subscription or narrow local option. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Meal-delivery expansion calibrated across worker-owned community kitchens, local farmer-supported prepared meals, plant-forward subscriptions, organic meal kits, parent-owned meal-kit brands, and food-platform consolidators. Linked evidence Revive & Thrive Project's public record makes Good Deal relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits. [10]
Cost Transparency ? Credit for clear posted prices, all-in fees, unit costs, public rate cards, margin/cost visibility, or surplus-allocation transparency, especially in markets where opaque quotes, hidden fees, or individualized pricing are normal.	1 / 3	Revive & Thrive Project's public record makes Cost Transparency relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits. Revive & Thrive Project's public record makes Cost Transparency relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits. This adds Cost Transparency credit because the practice creates unusual food access, transparent value, local-farmer support, chef autonomy, plant-forward substitution, or lower-waste meal planning. The credit is capped where the service is still a private subscription or narrow local option. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Meal-delivery expansion calibrated across worker-owned community kitchens, local farmer-supported prepared meals, plant-forward subscriptions, organic meal kits, parent-owned meal-kit brands, and food-platform consolidators. Linked evidence Revive & Thrive Project's public record makes Cost Transparency relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits. [11]

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

High 80/100

13 verified linked claims 13 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 13/13 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 17/20

13 verified linked claims

Source quality 10/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 14/18

13 direct claims across 13 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 10/10

13/13 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending

VerificationUnverified

ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)

ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)

Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.

Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

1Revive & Thrive Project's public record identifies its ownership, parent relationship, or institutional form in the meal-kit, prepared-meal, or food-delivery market.

Ownership Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Revive & Thrive Project official siteGeneral web source · 58%

2Revive & Thrive Project's public materials show whether control is held by workers, a cooperative kitchen, founders, a private platform, a public company, or a parent food group.

Governance Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Revive & Thrive Project official siteGeneral web source · 58%

3Revive & Thrive Project's model determines whether meal value is routed through cooperative kitchens, local farmers, public-benefit food work, private subscriptions, or platform scale.

Extraction Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Revive & Thrive Project official siteGeneral web source · 58%

4Revive & Thrive Project's reviewed public record shows the degree to which cooks, delivery workers, farmers, chefs, or ordinary employees have binding power rather than vendor or employment dependence.

Labor Sovereignty Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Revive & Thrive meals pageGeneral web source · 58%

5Revive & Thrive Project's service affects access to prepared food, home cooking, disability-friendly meal support, local farmer demand, chef income, or lower-friction meal planning.

Solidarity Unemployed Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Revive & Thrive meals pageGeneral web source · 58%

6Revive & Thrive Project's public model affects whether spoilage, missed delivery, food-safety, cancellation, packaging, and meal-selection risks are absorbed by the institution or shifted to customers and workers.

Loss Bearing Fidelity Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Revive & Thrive meals pageGeneral web source · 58%

7Revive & Thrive Project operates in a market where customers often face recurring orders, changing menus, plan deadlines, delivery windows, shipping fees, and freshness uncertainty.

Market Conduct Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Revive & Thrive meals pageGeneral web source · 58%

8Revive & Thrive Project's core product integrity depends on ingredient quality, prepared-food safety, nutritional quality, packaging, accurate menus, and whether convenience improves or degrades ordinary meals.

Product Integrity Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Revive & Thrive Project official siteGeneral web source · 58%

9Revive & Thrive Project's scale, distribution network, platform role, or local-kitchen model affects whether growth strengthens food access or turns meals into a consolidated private subscription system.

Scale Integrity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Revive & Thrive meals pageGeneral web source · 58%

10Revive & Thrive Project's public record makes Good Deal relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits.

Good Deal Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Revive & Thrive meals pageGeneral web source · 58%

11Revive & Thrive Project's public record makes Cost Transparency relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits.

Cost Transparency Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Revive & Thrive meals pageGeneral web source · 58%

12Revive & Thrive Project's public record makes High-Carbon Products relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits.

High Carbon Products Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Revive & Thrive meals pageGeneral web source · 58%

13Revive & Thrive Project's public record makes Subscription Capture relevant through its ownership, sourcing, food-safety record, recurring-payment design, meat or dairy exposure, local-farmer support, platform data use, or public accountability limits.

Subscription Capture Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 13, 2026

Revive & Thrive meals pageGeneral web source · 58%

Alternatives

Competitors

AGOOD61 Three Stone Hearth worker-owned community-supported kitchen · same market AGOOD60 Cheese Board Collective worker cooperative · same market AGOOD60 ChiFresh Kitchen worker-owned prepared-meal cooperative · same market AGOOD59 Alvarado Street Bakery worker-owned bakery · same market AGOOD59 Arizmendi Bakery worker cooperative bakery · same market AGOOD59 Rainbow Grocery Cooperative worker cooperative grocer · same market AGOOD58 Equal Exchange worker cooperative · same market AGOOD58 Niles Pie Company worker-owned pie shop and bakery · same market

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for Revive & Thrive Project Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.

View Full Audit Log