private Jesuit nonprofit university

Seattle University

A private Jesuit nonprofit university in Seattle offering undergraduate, graduate, law, and professional programs. Seattle University is more mission-bound and smaller than elite research universities, but high private tuition, trustee control, and explicit treatment of unpaid balances as educational loans keep it below public alternatives.

Why this matters: Seattle University is an important local private competitor to UW and Seattle-area public colleges.

Letter grade D Extractive High confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1 Last reviewed May 12, 2026

Final Score 27* D - Extractive

DEXTRACTIVE27 pts

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

Base Material33

Bonus+1

Cap41Ownership <= 4 and Governance <= 4

After Cap34

Penalties-7

!Not Verified

Represent this organization?

Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.

Request verification

Evaluation Overview

D - Extractive

The score turns mainly on Ownership, with the largest penalty coming from Debt Peonage.

Strengths

Ownership4/10
Governance4/10
Extraction4/10

Penalties

Debt Peonage-2
Accountability Opacity-2
Ecological Harm-1
Identity Capture-1

Evidence state

ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)
ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
Linked claims15
Direct axis claims15
Coverage15/15

Scoring Axes

Axis	Score	Why this score
Ownership ? Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control at 10.	4 / 10	Seattle University's public record identifies it as a public, private nonprofit, for-profit, community-college, land-grant, or online higher-education institution. Seattle University's public record identifies it as a public, private nonprofit, for-profit, community-college, land-grant, or online higher-education institution. On Ownership, Seattle University sits in the middle: the institution has real education or research value and some public or nonprofit constraint, but students and ordinary workers still do not control price, admissions, curriculum, discipline, labor policy, or institutional priorities. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Higher-education expansion batch calibrated across public research universities, private elite universities, online universities, community colleges, work colleges, and for-profit colleges. Linked evidence Seattle University's public record identifies it as a public, private nonprofit, for-profit, community-college, land-grant, or online higher-education institution. [1] context Seattle University's public record shows whether binding authority sits with regents, trustees, elected/public bodies, governors, executives, or private owners rather than with students and ordinary workers. [2] context Seattle University's tuition, fee, aid, no-tuition, or online-pricing model determines how much education cost is shifted to students and families versus absorbed by public subsidy, endowment, donors, or the institution. [3] context Seattle University's public governance materials do not show ordinary faculty, staff, or student workers holding full binding democratic control over the institution. [4] context Seattle University's access model affects people seeking credentials, retraining, transfer pathways, career mobility, or adult education during economically vulnerable periods. [5] context Seattle University's public model shows whether the institution absorbs education cost through public subsidy, endowment, philanthropy, or low tuition, or instead passes risk to students through tuition bills and debt exposure. [6] context Seattle University operates in credential markets where students face asymmetric information, switching costs, sunk credits, admissions pressure, and debt-financed purchasing decisions. [7] context Seattle University's core service has real education, research, transfer, workforce, medical, or public-service value, but integrity depends on access, quality, cost, academic freedom, and student outcomes. [8] context Seattle University's scale makes its decisions consequential for students, workers, public budgets, local communities, patients, research subjects, or credential markets. [9]
Governance ? Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic stakeholder control at 10.	4 / 10	Seattle University's public record gives limited direct evidence about whether binding authority sits with regents, trustees, elected/public bodies, governors, executives, or private owners rather than with students and ordinary workers. Seattle University's public record gives limited direct evidence about whether binding authority sits with regents, trustees, elected/public bodies, governors, executives, or private owners rather than with students and ordinary workers. On Governance, Seattle University sits in the middle: the institution has real education or research value and some public or nonprofit constraint, but students and ordinary workers still do not control price, admissions, curriculum, discipline, labor policy, or institutional priorities. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Higher-education expansion batch calibrated across public research universities, private elite universities, online universities, community colleges, work colleges, and for-profit colleges. Linked evidence context Seattle University's public record identifies it as a public, private nonprofit, for-profit, community-college, land-grant, or online higher-education institution. [1] Seattle University's public record shows whether binding authority sits with regents, trustees, elected/public bodies, governors, executives, or private owners rather than with students and ordinary workers. [2] context Seattle University's tuition, fee, aid, no-tuition, or online-pricing model determines how much education cost is shifted to students and families versus absorbed by public subsidy, endowment, donors, or the institution. [3] context Seattle University's public governance materials do not show ordinary faculty, staff, or student workers holding full binding democratic control over the institution. [4] context Seattle University's access model affects people seeking credentials, retraining, transfer pathways, career mobility, or adult education during economically vulnerable periods. [5] context Seattle University's public model shows whether the institution absorbs education cost through public subsidy, endowment, philanthropy, or low tuition, or instead passes risk to students through tuition bills and debt exposure. [6] context Seattle University operates in credential markets where students face asymmetric information, switching costs, sunk credits, admissions pressure, and debt-financed purchasing decisions. [7] context Seattle University's core service has real education, research, transfer, workforce, medical, or public-service value, but integrity depends on access, quality, cost, academic freedom, and student outcomes. [8] context Seattle University's scale makes its decisions consequential for students, workers, public budgets, local communities, patients, research subjects, or credential markets. [9]
Extraction ? Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured extraction judgment.	4 / 10	Seattle University's tuition, fee, aid, no-tuition, or online-pricing model determines how much education cost is shifted to students and families versus absorbed by public subsidy, endowment, donors, or the institution. Seattle University's tuition, fee, aid, no-tuition, or online-pricing model determines how much education cost is shifted to students and families versus absorbed by public subsidy, endowment, donors, or the institution. On Extraction, Seattle University sits in the middle: the institution has real education or research value and some public or nonprofit constraint, but students and ordinary workers still do not control price, admissions, curriculum, discipline, labor policy, or institutional priorities. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Higher-education expansion batch calibrated across public research universities, private elite universities, online universities, community colleges, work colleges, and for-profit colleges. Linked evidence context Seattle University's public record identifies it as a public, private nonprofit, for-profit, community-college, land-grant, or online higher-education institution. [1] context Seattle University's public record shows whether binding authority sits with regents, trustees, elected/public bodies, governors, executives, or private owners rather than with students and ordinary workers. [2] Seattle University's tuition, fee, aid, no-tuition, or online-pricing model determines how much education cost is shifted to students and families versus absorbed by public subsidy, endowment, donors, or the institution. [3] context Seattle University's public governance materials do not show ordinary faculty, staff, or student workers holding full binding democratic control over the institution. [4] context Seattle University's access model affects people seeking credentials, retraining, transfer pathways, career mobility, or adult education during economically vulnerable periods. [5] context Seattle University's public model shows whether the institution absorbs education cost through public subsidy, endowment, philanthropy, or low tuition, or instead passes risk to students through tuition bills and debt exposure. [6] context Seattle University operates in credential markets where students face asymmetric information, switching costs, sunk credits, admissions pressure, and debt-financed purchasing decisions. [7] context Seattle University's core service has real education, research, transfer, workforce, medical, or public-service value, but integrity depends on access, quality, cost, academic freedom, and student outcomes. [8] context Seattle University's scale makes its decisions consequential for students, workers, public budgets, local communities, patients, research subjects, or credential markets. [9]
Labor Sovereignty ? Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at 7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling, retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of worker voice, or extreme turnover.	4 / 7	Seattle University's public governance materials do not show ordinary faculty, staff, or student workers holding full binding democratic control over the institution. Seattle University's public governance materials do not show ordinary faculty, staff, or student workers holding full binding democratic control over the institution. On Labor Sovereignty, Seattle University sits in the middle: the institution has real education or research value and some public or nonprofit constraint, but students and ordinary workers still do not control price, admissions, curriculum, discipline, labor policy, or institutional priorities. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Higher-education expansion batch calibrated across public research universities, private elite universities, online universities, community colleges, work colleges, and for-profit colleges. Linked evidence context Seattle University's public record identifies it as a public, private nonprofit, for-profit, community-college, land-grant, or online higher-education institution. [1] context Seattle University's public record shows whether binding authority sits with regents, trustees, elected/public bodies, governors, executives, or private owners rather than with students and ordinary workers. [2] context Seattle University's tuition, fee, aid, no-tuition, or online-pricing model determines how much education cost is shifted to students and families versus absorbed by public subsidy, endowment, donors, or the institution. [3] Seattle University's public governance materials do not show ordinary faculty, staff, or student workers holding full binding democratic control over the institution. [4] context Seattle University's access model affects people seeking credentials, retraining, transfer pathways, career mobility, or adult education during economically vulnerable periods. [5] context Seattle University's public model shows whether the institution absorbs education cost through public subsidy, endowment, philanthropy, or low tuition, or instead passes risk to students through tuition bills and debt exposure. [6] context Seattle University operates in credential markets where students face asymmetric information, switching costs, sunk credits, admissions pressure, and debt-financed purchasing decisions. [7] context Seattle University's core service has real education, research, transfer, workforce, medical, or public-service value, but integrity depends on access, quality, cost, academic freedom, and student outcomes. [8] context Seattle University's scale makes its decisions consequential for students, workers, public budgets, local communities, patients, research subjects, or credential markets. [9]
Solidarity with the Unemployed ? Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment, and non-competes.	4 / 7	Seattle University's access model affects people seeking credentials, retraining, transfer pathways, career mobility, or adult education during economically vulnerable periods. Seattle University's access model affects people seeking credentials, retraining, transfer pathways, career mobility, or adult education during economically vulnerable periods. On Solidarity with the Unemployed, Seattle University sits in the middle: the institution has real education or research value and some public or nonprofit constraint, but students and ordinary workers still do not control price, admissions, curriculum, discipline, labor policy, or institutional priorities. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Higher-education expansion batch calibrated across public research universities, private elite universities, online universities, community colleges, work colleges, and for-profit colleges. Linked evidence context Seattle University's public record identifies it as a public, private nonprofit, for-profit, community-college, land-grant, or online higher-education institution. [1] context Seattle University's public record shows whether binding authority sits with regents, trustees, elected/public bodies, governors, executives, or private owners rather than with students and ordinary workers. [2] context Seattle University's tuition, fee, aid, no-tuition, or online-pricing model determines how much education cost is shifted to students and families versus absorbed by public subsidy, endowment, donors, or the institution. [3] context Seattle University's public governance materials do not show ordinary faculty, staff, or student workers holding full binding democratic control over the institution. [4] Seattle University's access model affects people seeking credentials, retraining, transfer pathways, career mobility, or adult education during economically vulnerable periods. [5] context Seattle University's public model shows whether the institution absorbs education cost through public subsidy, endowment, philanthropy, or low tuition, or instead passes risk to students through tuition bills and debt exposure. [6] context Seattle University operates in credential markets where students face asymmetric information, switching costs, sunk credits, admissions pressure, and debt-financed purchasing decisions. [7] context Seattle University's core service has real education, research, transfer, workforce, medical, or public-service value, but integrity depends on access, quality, cost, academic freedom, and student outcomes. [8] context Seattle University's scale makes its decisions consequential for students, workers, public budgets, local communities, patients, research subjects, or credential markets. [9]
Loss-Bearing Fidelity ? Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and public obligations.	4 / 7	Seattle University's public model shows whether the institution absorbs education cost through public subsidy, endowment, philanthropy, or low tuition, or instead passes risk to students through tuition bills and debt exposure. Seattle University's public model shows whether the institution absorbs education cost through public subsidy, endowment, philanthropy, or low tuition, or instead passes risk to students through tuition bills and debt exposure. On Loss-Bearing Fidelity, Seattle University sits in the middle: the institution has real education or research value and some public or nonprofit constraint, but students and ordinary workers still do not control price, admissions, curriculum, discipline, labor policy, or institutional priorities. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Higher-education expansion batch calibrated across public research universities, private elite universities, online universities, community colleges, work colleges, and for-profit colleges. Linked evidence context Seattle University's public record identifies it as a public, private nonprofit, for-profit, community-college, land-grant, or online higher-education institution. [1] context Seattle University's public record shows whether binding authority sits with regents, trustees, elected/public bodies, governors, executives, or private owners rather than with students and ordinary workers. [2] context Seattle University's tuition, fee, aid, no-tuition, or online-pricing model determines how much education cost is shifted to students and families versus absorbed by public subsidy, endowment, donors, or the institution. [3] context Seattle University's public governance materials do not show ordinary faculty, staff, or student workers holding full binding democratic control over the institution. [4] context Seattle University's access model affects people seeking credentials, retraining, transfer pathways, career mobility, or adult education during economically vulnerable periods. [5] Seattle University's public model shows whether the institution absorbs education cost through public subsidy, endowment, philanthropy, or low tuition, or instead passes risk to students through tuition bills and debt exposure. [6] context Seattle University operates in credential markets where students face asymmetric information, switching costs, sunk credits, admissions pressure, and debt-financed purchasing decisions. [7] context Seattle University's core service has real education, research, transfer, workforce, medical, or public-service value, but integrity depends on access, quality, cost, academic freedom, and student outcomes. [8] context Seattle University's scale makes its decisions consequential for students, workers, public budgets, local communities, patients, research subjects, or credential markets. [9]
Market Conduct ? Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.	2 / 5	Seattle University operates in credential markets where students face asymmetric information, switching costs, sunk credits, admissions pressure, and debt-financed purchasing decisions. Seattle University operates in credential markets where students face asymmetric information, switching costs, sunk credits, admissions pressure, and debt-financed purchasing decisions. On Market Conduct, Seattle University belongs low because institutional control, tuition economics, and credential-market power are mainly held by trustees, executives, private owners, or elite boards while students carry weak bargaining power. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Higher-education expansion batch calibrated across public research universities, private elite universities, online universities, community colleges, work colleges, and for-profit colleges. Linked evidence context Seattle University's public record identifies it as a public, private nonprofit, for-profit, community-college, land-grant, or online higher-education institution. [1] context Seattle University's public record shows whether binding authority sits with regents, trustees, elected/public bodies, governors, executives, or private owners rather than with students and ordinary workers. [2] context Seattle University's tuition, fee, aid, no-tuition, or online-pricing model determines how much education cost is shifted to students and families versus absorbed by public subsidy, endowment, donors, or the institution. [3] context Seattle University's public governance materials do not show ordinary faculty, staff, or student workers holding full binding democratic control over the institution. [4] context Seattle University's access model affects people seeking credentials, retraining, transfer pathways, career mobility, or adult education during economically vulnerable periods. [5] context Seattle University's public model shows whether the institution absorbs education cost through public subsidy, endowment, philanthropy, or low tuition, or instead passes risk to students through tuition bills and debt exposure. [6] Seattle University operates in credential markets where students face asymmetric information, switching costs, sunk credits, admissions pressure, and debt-financed purchasing decisions. [7] context Seattle University's core service has real education, research, transfer, workforce, medical, or public-service value, but integrity depends on access, quality, cost, academic freedom, and student outcomes. [8] context Seattle University's scale makes its decisions consequential for students, workers, public budgets, local communities, patients, research subjects, or credential markets. [9]
Product Integrity ? Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.	4 / 5	Seattle University's core service has real education, research, transfer, workforce, medical, or public-service value, but integrity depends on access, quality, cost, academic freedom, and student outcomes. Seattle University's core service has real education, research, transfer, workforce, medical, or public-service value, but integrity depends on access, quality, cost, academic freedom, and student outcomes. On Product Integrity, Seattle University sits in the middle: the institution has real education or research value and some public or nonprofit constraint, but students and ordinary workers still do not control price, admissions, curriculum, discipline, labor policy, or institutional priorities. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Higher-education expansion batch calibrated across public research universities, private elite universities, online universities, community colleges, work colleges, and for-profit colleges. Linked evidence context Seattle University's public record identifies it as a public, private nonprofit, for-profit, community-college, land-grant, or online higher-education institution. [1] context Seattle University's public record shows whether binding authority sits with regents, trustees, elected/public bodies, governors, executives, or private owners rather than with students and ordinary workers. [2] context Seattle University's tuition, fee, aid, no-tuition, or online-pricing model determines how much education cost is shifted to students and families versus absorbed by public subsidy, endowment, donors, or the institution. [3] context Seattle University's public governance materials do not show ordinary faculty, staff, or student workers holding full binding democratic control over the institution. [4] context Seattle University's access model affects people seeking credentials, retraining, transfer pathways, career mobility, or adult education during economically vulnerable periods. [5] context Seattle University's public model shows whether the institution absorbs education cost through public subsidy, endowment, philanthropy, or low tuition, or instead passes risk to students through tuition bills and debt exposure. [6] context Seattle University operates in credential markets where students face asymmetric information, switching costs, sunk credits, admissions pressure, and debt-financed purchasing decisions. [7] Seattle University's core service has real education, research, transfer, workforce, medical, or public-service value, but integrity depends on access, quality, cost, academic freedom, and student outcomes. [8] context Seattle University's scale makes its decisions consequential for students, workers, public budgets, local communities, patients, research subjects, or credential markets. [9]
Scale Integrity ? Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.	3 / 5	Seattle University's scale makes its decisions consequential for students, workers, public budgets, local communities, patients, research subjects, or credential markets. Seattle University's scale makes its decisions consequential for students, workers, public budgets, local communities, patients, research subjects, or credential markets. On Scale Integrity, Seattle University belongs low because institutional control, tuition economics, and credential-market power are mainly held by trustees, executives, private owners, or elite boards while students carry weak bargaining power. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Higher-education expansion batch calibrated across public research universities, private elite universities, online universities, community colleges, work colleges, and for-profit colleges. Linked evidence context Seattle University's public record identifies it as a public, private nonprofit, for-profit, community-college, land-grant, or online higher-education institution. [1] context Seattle University's public record shows whether binding authority sits with regents, trustees, elected/public bodies, governors, executives, or private owners rather than with students and ordinary workers. [2] context Seattle University's tuition, fee, aid, no-tuition, or online-pricing model determines how much education cost is shifted to students and families versus absorbed by public subsidy, endowment, donors, or the institution. [3] context Seattle University's public governance materials do not show ordinary faculty, staff, or student workers holding full binding democratic control over the institution. [4] context Seattle University's access model affects people seeking credentials, retraining, transfer pathways, career mobility, or adult education during economically vulnerable periods. [5] context Seattle University's public model shows whether the institution absorbs education cost through public subsidy, endowment, philanthropy, or low tuition, or instead passes risk to students through tuition bills and debt exposure. [6] context Seattle University operates in credential markets where students face asymmetric information, switching costs, sunk credits, admissions pressure, and debt-financed purchasing decisions. [7] context Seattle University's core service has real education, research, transfer, workforce, medical, or public-service value, but integrity depends on access, quality, cost, academic freedom, and student outcomes. [8] Seattle University's scale makes its decisions consequential for students, workers, public budgets, local communities, patients, research subjects, or credential markets. [9]

Penalties

Penalty	Applied	Why this penalty
Ecological Harm ? Footprint, trajectory, irreversibility, culpability, and scale, including whether ecological harm is central to the model and continued after credible notice. Range: -30 to 0.	-1	Seattle University's public record makes Ecological Harm relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research, campus footprint,… Seattle University's public record makes Ecological Harm relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research, campus footprint, lobbying, online monitoring, identity formation, or institutional neutrality claims. This warrants a Ecological Harm penalty because the evidence connects the institution's actual model to cost shifting, debt exposure, animal research, ecological footprint, policy influence, surveillance, identity pressure, or neutrality theater. The value is calibrated against other higher-education entries rather than assigned automatically to the whole sector. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Higher-education expansion batch calibrated across public research universities, private elite universities, online universities, community colleges, work colleges, and for-profit colleges. Linked evidence Seattle University's public record makes Ecological Harm relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research, campus footprint, lobbying, online monitoring, identity formation, or institutional neutrality claims. [11]
Debt Peonage ? Coercive or structurally inescapable debt systems, including bankruptcy-resistant student debt, compelled servicing relationships, wage or benefit garnishment leverage, distressed-debt buying, debt collection, or refinancing practices that turn education, medical care, housing, household necessity, or public obligation into long-term debtor control. Ordinary transparent lending is not penalized by itself. Range: -12 to 0.	-2	Seattle University's public record makes Debt Peonage relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research, campus footprint,… Seattle University's public record makes Debt Peonage relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research, campus footprint, lobbying, online monitoring, identity formation, or institutional neutrality claims. This warrants a Debt Peonage penalty because the evidence connects the institution's actual model to cost shifting, debt exposure, animal research, ecological footprint, policy influence, surveillance, identity pressure, or neutrality theater. The value is calibrated against other higher-education entries rather than assigned automatically to the whole sector. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Higher-education expansion batch calibrated across public research universities, private elite universities, online universities, community colleges, work colleges, and for-profit colleges. Linked evidence Seattle University's public record makes Debt Peonage relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research, campus footprint, lobbying, online monitoring, identity formation, or institutional neutrality claims. [12]
Accountability Opacity ? Material opacity, reputation laundering, or hidden accountability structures that prevent public accountability. Range: -2 to 0.	-2	Seattle University's public record makes Accountability Opacity relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research, campus… Seattle University's public record makes Accountability Opacity relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research, campus footprint, lobbying, online monitoring, identity formation, or institutional neutrality claims. This warrants a Accountability Opacity penalty because the evidence connects the institution's actual model to cost shifting, debt exposure, animal research, ecological footprint, policy influence, surveillance, identity pressure, or neutrality theater. The value is calibrated against other higher-education entries rather than assigned automatically to the whole sector. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Higher-education expansion batch calibrated across public research universities, private elite universities, online universities, community colleges, work colleges, and for-profit colleges. Linked evidence Seattle University's public record makes Accountability Opacity relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research, campus footprint, lobbying, online monitoring, identity formation, or institutional neutrality claims. [13]
Identity Capture ? Customer pressure, employee pressure, and pervasive identity saturation. Range: -3 to 0.	-1	Seattle University's public record makes Identity Capture relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research, campus footprint,… Seattle University's public record makes Identity Capture relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research, campus footprint, lobbying, online monitoring, identity formation, or institutional neutrality claims. This warrants a Identity Capture penalty because the evidence connects the institution's actual model to cost shifting, debt exposure, animal research, ecological footprint, policy influence, surveillance, identity pressure, or neutrality theater. The value is calibrated against other higher-education entries rather than assigned automatically to the whole sector. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Higher-education expansion batch calibrated across public research universities, private elite universities, online universities, community colleges, work colleges, and for-profit colleges. Linked evidence Seattle University's public record makes Identity Capture relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research, campus footprint, lobbying, online monitoring, identity formation, or institutional neutrality claims. [14]
Ideological Disavowal ? Concealed ideology presented as neutrality, expertise, professional necessity, public-service administration, market inevitability, or non-ideological common sense while exercising power. Range: -3 to 0.	-1	Seattle University's public record makes Ideological Disavowal relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research, campus… Seattle University's public record makes Ideological Disavowal relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research, campus footprint, lobbying, online monitoring, identity formation, or institutional neutrality claims. This warrants a Ideological Disavowal penalty because the evidence connects the institution's actual model to cost shifting, debt exposure, animal research, ecological footprint, policy influence, surveillance, identity pressure, or neutrality theater. The value is calibrated against other higher-education entries rather than assigned automatically to the whole sector. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Higher-education expansion batch calibrated across public research universities, private elite universities, online universities, community colleges, work colleges, and for-profit colleges. Linked evidence Seattle University's public record makes Ideological Disavowal relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research, campus footprint, lobbying, online monitoring, identity formation, or institutional neutrality claims. [15]

Bonus Credits

Bonus	Credit	Why this credit
Constitutional Spirit ? Credit for respecting constitutional rights and civil-liberties norms even where private law does not strictly require it.	1 / 3	Seattle University's public record makes Constitutional Spirit relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research, campus… Seattle University's public record makes Constitutional Spirit relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research, campus footprint, lobbying, online monitoring, identity formation, or institutional neutrality claims. This supports limited Constitutional Spirit credit because the record shows concrete affordability, public-access, no-tuition, constitutional, or transparency practice beyond ordinary college branding. The credit is limited unless the practice is durable and backed by user power rather than discretionary administration. Calibration notes Comparative anchor: Higher-education expansion batch calibrated across public research universities, private elite universities, online universities, community colleges, work colleges, and for-profit colleges. Linked evidence Seattle University's public record makes Constitutional Spirit relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research, campus footprint, lobbying, online monitoring, identity formation, or institutional neutrality claims. [10]

Confidence Basis

Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.

High 85/100

15 verified linked claims 15 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 15/15 components covered

This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.

Claim confidence 16/20

15 verified linked claims

Source quality 16/18

Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability

Direct axis-specific claims 14/18

15 direct claims across 15 active components

Dispute load 12/12

0 disputed claims on this entity

Recency 10/10

Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026

Reviewer status 7/12

Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding

Component coverage 10/10

15/15 evidence-bearing components have direct support

Evidence State

Profile stateAI draft / human-pending

VerificationUnverified

ConfidenceHigh confidence (AI)

ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)

Correction routeUse “Challenge this rating” for factual errors, missing counterevidence, source problems, or calculation mistakes.

Company responseCompany representatives can submit source-backed corrections; payment never changes scores or reviewer authority.

Claims and Sources

Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.

* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.

1Seattle University's public record identifies it as a public, private nonprofit, for-profit, community-college, land-grant, or online higher-education institution.

Ownership Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Seattle University Board of TrusteesPrimary institutional record · 90%

2Seattle University's public record shows whether binding authority sits with regents, trustees, elected/public bodies, governors, executives, or private owners rather than with students and ordinary workers.

Governance Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Seattle University Board of TrusteesPrimary institutional record · 90%

3Seattle University's tuition, fee, aid, no-tuition, or online-pricing model determines how much education cost is shifted to students and families versus absorbed by public subsidy, endowment, donors, or the institution.

Extraction Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Seattle University paying my billPrimary institutional record · 90%

4Seattle University's public governance materials do not show ordinary faculty, staff, or student workers holding full binding democratic control over the institution.

Labor Sovereignty Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Seattle University Board of TrusteesPrimary institutional record · 90%

5Seattle University's access model affects people seeking credentials, retraining, transfer pathways, career mobility, or adult education during economically vulnerable periods.

Solidarity Unemployed Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Seattle University paying my billPrimary institutional record · 90%

6Seattle University's public model shows whether the institution absorbs education cost through public subsidy, endowment, philanthropy, or low tuition, or instead passes risk to students through tuition bills and debt exposure.

Loss Bearing Fidelity Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Seattle University paying my billPrimary institutional record · 90%

7Seattle University operates in credential markets where students face asymmetric information, switching costs, sunk credits, admissions pressure, and debt-financed purchasing decisions.

Market Conduct Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Seattle University tuition and feesPrimary institutional record · 90%

8Seattle University's core service has real education, research, transfer, workforce, medical, or public-service value, but integrity depends on access, quality, cost, academic freedom, and student outcomes.

Product Integrity Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Seattle University Board of TrusteesPrimary institutional record · 90%

9Seattle University's scale makes its decisions consequential for students, workers, public budgets, local communities, patients, research subjects, or credential markets.

Scale Integrity Verified High confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Seattle University Board of TrusteesPrimary institutional record · 90%

10Seattle University's public record makes Constitutional Spirit relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research, campus footprint, lobbying, online monitoring, identity formation, or institutional neutrality claims.

Constitutional Spirit Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Seattle University tuition and feesPrimary institutional record · 90%

11Seattle University's public record makes Ecological Harm relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research, campus footprint, lobbying, online monitoring, identity formation, or institutional neutrality claims.

Ecological Harm Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Seattle University tuition and feesPrimary institutional record · 90%

12Seattle University's public record makes Debt Peonage relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research, campus footprint, lobbying, online monitoring, identity formation, or institutional neutrality claims.

Debt Peonage Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Seattle University tuition and feesPrimary institutional record · 90%

13Seattle University's public record makes Accountability Opacity relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research, campus footprint, lobbying, online monitoring, identity formation, or institutional neutrality claims.

Accountability Opacity Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Seattle University tuition and feesPrimary institutional record · 90%

14Seattle University's public record makes Identity Capture relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research, campus footprint, lobbying, online monitoring, identity formation, or institutional neutrality claims.

Identity Capture Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Seattle University tuition and feesPrimary institutional record · 90%

15Seattle University's public record makes Ideological Disavowal relevant through affordability, public governance, no-tuition structure, student debt exposure, animal research, campus footprint, lobbying, online monitoring, identity formation, or institutional neutrality claims.

Ideological Disavowal Verified Medium confidence Human-reviewed May 12, 2026

Seattle University tuition and feesPrimary institutional record · 90%

Alternatives

Competitors

AGOOD54 Berea College private nonprofit work college · same market AGOOD52 Maricopa Community Colleges public community-college system · same market AGOOD51 Miami Dade College public college · same market AGOOD51 Seattle Colleges public community-college district · same market AGOOD50 Bellevue College public college · same market BQUALIFIED49 Dallas College public community-college system · same market BQUALIFIED46 Western Governors University nonprofit online university · same market CPERFORMATIVE36 State University of New York public university system · same market

Help Improve This Profile

Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.

How This Page Is Maintained

Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.

Civic Note

Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.

Submit evidence for Seattle University Add one source-backed fact for review.

Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.

Audit Log

Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.

No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.

View Full Audit Log