public company
T-Mobile US
Industry Internet
A public wireless and home-internet carrier competing with AT&T and Verizon. T-Mobile provides useful price competition, but recurring-plan capture, concentrated telecom power, location-data enforcement history, and repeated data-security problems make it a weak institutional actor.
Why this matters: T-Mobile is often the cheaper telecom competitor, but lower price does not erase privacy and infrastructure-power concerns.
Letter grade F Malignant Medium confidence (AI) Rubric gcd-rubric-v1
* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.
T-Mobile US receives the Private Government badge because it combines large-scale private rule-setting over customers, workers, users, members, or counterparties with OpenLobby-documented lobbying of about $1.5M on public policy issues.
Evidence: [10]
Request verification to have the evidence record checked against primary materials and organization-supplied documents. Verification does not buy a higher score; scores change only when review finds factual errors, omissions, or miscalibration.
Evaluation Overview
F - Malignant
The score turns mainly on Product Integrity, with the largest penalty coming from Policy Capture.
Strengths
- Product Integrity3/5
- Market Conduct2/5
- Ownership1/10
Penalties
- Policy Capture-5
- Surveillance Capture-5
- Human Harm-4
- Subscription Capture-3
Evidence state
- ConfidenceMedium confidence (AI)
- ThoroughnessDeveloped (AI)
- Linked claims10
- Direct axis claims9
- Coverage9/16
Scoring Axes
| Axis | Score | Why this score |
|---|---|---|
Ownership
?
Control rights: shareholder-dominated at 0, worker cooperative control
at 10.
|
1 / 10 |
T-Mobile US is a shareholder-governed public company, so control over network and plan design is investor-centered rather than customer-controlled. Linked evidence
|
Governance
?
Binding decision authority: centralized control at 0, democratic
stakeholder control at 10.
|
1 / 10 |
T-Mobile US sells wireless service, home internet, devices, and business connectivity as a major U.S. carrier. Linked evidence
|
Extraction
?
Surplus allocation, wage share, CEO pay ratio, margins, and structured
extraction judgment.
|
1 / 10 |
T-Mobile US sells wireless service, home internet, devices, and business connectivity as a major U.S. carrier. Linked evidence
|
Labor Sovereignty
?
Worker power: coercive conditions at 0, co-determination or ownership at
7. Employee dissatisfaction matters only when source-backed evidence
shows concrete limits on worker agency, such as coercive scheduling,
retaliation, wage theft, harassment, unsafe conditions, suppression of
worker voice, or extreme turnover.
|
1 / 7 |
T-Mobile US sells wireless service, home internet, devices, and business connectivity as a major U.S. carrier. Linked evidence
|
Solidarity with the
Unemployed
?
Treatment of exits and nonworkers, including severance, redeployment,
and non-competes.
|
1 / 7 |
T-Mobile US sells wireless service, home internet, devices, and business connectivity as a major U.S. carrier. Linked evidence
|
Loss-Bearing Fidelity
?
Willingness to absorb costs to preserve values, workers, users, and
public obligations.
|
1 / 7 |
T-Mobile US sells wireless service, home internet, devices, and business connectivity as a major U.S. carrier. Linked evidence
|
Market Conduct
?
Pricing fairness, switching costs, lock-in, and rent extraction.
|
2 / 5 |
T-Mobile US sells wireless service, home internet, devices, and business connectivity as a major U.S. carrier. Linked evidence
|
Product Integrity
?
Preservation of quality rather than degradation for monetization.
|
3 / 5 |
T-Mobile US sells wireless service, home internet, devices, and business connectivity as a major U.S. carrier. Linked evidence
|
Scale Integrity
?
Whether growth improves or degrades fairness and accountability.
|
1 / 5 |
T-Mobile US sells wireless service, home internet, devices, and business connectivity as a major U.S. carrier. Linked evidence
|
Penalties
| Penalty | Applied | Why this penalty |
|---|---|---|
Human Harm
?
Severity, scale, culpability, vulnerable targets, willful reoffense,
reputation laundering, pattern escalation, and time decay. Range: -20 to
0.
|
-4 |
T-Mobile has faced major data-security incidents, including a large 2021 breach settlement and later FCC data-security settlement, creating material consumer harm risk. Linked evidence
|
Policy Capture
?
Private-interest attempts to bend law, regulation, subsidies, taxes,
enforcement, trade, labor, safety, competition, environmental,
healthcare, housing, surveillance, civil-liberties, or consumer policy
against workers, customers, citizens, affected communities, or
ecological life. Public-interest advocacy is not penalized merely
because it is lobbying. Range: -15 to 0.
|
-5 |
OpenLobby records T-MOBILE US INC. lobbying on tax and technology with about $1.5M in spending across 21 filings; the reviewed filings document private institutional lobbying over public rules rather than a public-interest advocacy role. Linked evidence
|
Subscription Capture
?
Manipulative recurring-payment, automatic-renewal,
cancellation-friction, bundling, trial-conversion, or refund designs
that profit from inertia or confusion. Range: -5 to 0.
|
-3 |
T-Mobile depends on recurring wireless, device-financing, upgrade, and home-internet relationships with switching friction. Linked evidence
|
Accountability Opacity
?
Material opacity, reputation laundering, or hidden accountability
structures that prevent public accountability. Range: -2 to 0.
|
-2 |
T-Mobile plan terms, device financing, data security, and location-data practices are difficult for ordinary customers to evaluate comparatively. Linked evidence
|
Surveillance Capture
?
Invasive surveillance, unreasonably non-optional tracking, facial
recognition, biometric identification, or AI behavior scanning of
customers, workers, bystanders, or the public. Range: -5 to 0.
|
-5 |
The FCC fined T-Mobile and other major carriers over selling access to customer location information without reasonable safeguards. Linked evidence
|
Ideological Disavowal
?
Concealed ideology presented as neutrality, expertise, professional
necessity, public-service administration, market inevitability, or
non-ideological common sense while exercising power. Range: -3 to 0.
|
-1 |
T-Mobile retains conduct relevant to the Ideological Disavowal penalty: it presents telecom pricing, location-data handling, and data-security tradeoffs as ordinary customer service while exercising concentrated network power. Linked evidence
|
Bonus Credits
| Bonus | Credit | Why this credit |
|---|---|---|
Good Deal
?
Credit for unusually fair value: durable quality, fair pricing, low
lock-in, and clear customer surplus.
|
1 / 3 |
It has historically competed aggressively on wireless pricing and plan access compared with AT&T and Verizon, even while preserving telecom lock-in and privacy risks. Linked evidence
|
Confidence Basis
Confidence Basis
Confidence is computed from the evidence trail and review state, not typed into the profile by hand.
Medium 77/100
9 verified linked claims 9 direct axis claims 0 disputed claims 9/16 components covered
This confidence label measures the source-backed evidence trail. AI-scaffolded scores remain tentative until human review.
Claim confidence 18/20
9 verified linked claims
Source quality 16/18
Best source per verified claim, weighted by institutional reliability
Direct axis-specific claims 9/18
9 direct claims across 16 active components
Dispute load 12/12
0 disputed claims on this entity
Recency 10/10
Newest accepted timestamp: May 13, 2026
Reviewer status 7/12
Human-reviewed components score higher than AI scaffolding
Component coverage 6/10
9/16 evidence-bearing components have direct support
Evidence State
Evidence State
Claims and Sources
Claims are the evidence record. Each claim needs a source link, axis category, status, confidence level, and timestamp before it can support a score.
* Tentative scaffolding score. Not human-checked or final.1T-Mobile US is a shareholder-governed public company, so control over network and plan design is investor-centered rather than customer-controlled.
- T-Mobile annual reportsPrimary institutional record · 90%
2T-Mobile US sells wireless service, home internet, devices, and business connectivity as a major U.S. carrier.
- T-Mobile annual reportsPrimary institutional record · 90%
3The FCC fined T-Mobile and other major carriers over selling access to customer location information without reasonable safeguards.
- FCC carrier location-data finesPrimary public record · 100%
4T-Mobile has faced major data-security incidents, including a large 2021 breach settlement and later FCC data-security settlement, creating material consumer harm risk.
- FCC T-Mobile data breach settlementPrimary public record · 100%
- FTC T-Mobile data breach settlement noticePrimary public record · 100%
5T-Mobile depends on recurring wireless, device-financing, upgrade, and home-internet relationships with switching friction.
- T-Mobile annual reportsPrimary institutional record · 90%
6T-Mobile plan terms, device financing, data security, and location-data practices are difficult for ordinary customers to evaluate comparatively.
- T-Mobile privacy noticeGeneral web source · 58%
- FCC carrier location-data finesPrimary public record · 100%
7T-Mobile receives limited Good Deal credit because it has historically competed aggressively on wireless pricing and plan access compared with AT&T and Verizon, even while preserving telecom lock-in and privacy risks.
- T-Mobile annual reportsPrimary institutional record · 90%
8T-Mobile retains conduct relevant to the Ideological Disavowal penalty: it presents telecom pricing, location-data handling, and data-security tradeoffs as ordinary customer service while exercising concentrated network power.
- T-Mobile annual reportsPrimary institutional record · 90%
9OpenLobby records T-MOBILE US INC. lobbying on tax and technology with about $1.5M in spending across 21 filings; the reviewed filings document private institutional lobbying over public rules rather than a public-interest advocacy role.
- OpenLobby — T-MOBILE US INC. lobbying profileGeneral web source · 58%
10T-Mobile US receives the Private Government badge because it combines large-scale private rule-setting over customers, workers, users, members, or counterparties with OpenLobby-documented lobbying of about $1.5M on public policy issues.
- OpenLobby — T-MOBILE US INC. lobbying profileGeneral web source · 58%
Help Improve This Profile
Submit source-backed evidence or challenge a specific claim, source, axis value, or calculation below.
How This Page Is Maintained
Evidence comes in through contributors, is checked by verifiers, and is synthesized by reviewers. Founder authority remains narrow and visible; scores recalculate when verified claims or the rubric change.
Civic Note
Incorporation, limited liability, market access, and other institutional privileges are public grants. Good Companies Directory treats those privileges as conditional on accountability to workers, users, communities, and the public.
Submit evidence for T-Mobile US Add one source-backed fact for review.
Challenge this rating Point to a specific score, claim, source, or calculation problem.
Audit Log
Recent public changes for this company or group. The full audit log is part of the Transparency record.
No company-specific audit entries have been published yet.
View Full Audit Log